GuildWiki:Community portal/Archive

Server performance
To handle some of the load issues, we're going to be turning off page editing for peak hours (roughly, morning > evening, EST). It'll be on either side of that. This is a temporary measure while we sort out how best to upgrade the server, so we can get back to the Good Old Days as far as server speed goes. --Nunix 01:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, turning off the edits didn't really help as much as had been hoped; as mentioned previously over at Talk:Main Page if people are interested in better server performance (which simply equates to a need for better hardware) then there are one of two options: more and larger adverts, or more donations. Just about everything that can be done on the code end has been done. Purely a money thing now, unfortunately. The current donations and ad revenue can support GuildWiki at its current level, and no more. If you've got fundraiser ideas, a large amount of money you don't know what to do with, or maybe some beefy server hardware just laying around.. add to the Guildwiki talk:Community Portal or leave a note over at User talk:Gravewit. --Nunix 21:25, 21 January 2006 (UTC)


 * News update! We're going to be giving Steadfast Networks a shot come February 1st. The machine will be twice as fast as the one we're on now, for pretty much the same price. EV1Servers has done alright in the post-Segpub pinch, and kept us running, but the slowdowns have been pretty significant. So: February 1st! Will probably be some downtime that day, and maybe a few days after depending on DNS propagation. We'll keep ya'll updated if anything else pops up in the interim. --Nunix 22:19, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah steadfast is a good one, many sims websites i've used and worked with have used http://simgames.net/ - their free sims hosting service :) 11:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Holds breath...* :) --Karlos 15:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Hold it a little longer. Steadfast now says the machine won't be ready until the 3rd. I'm kinda miffed I wasn't given more notice (they just changed it today). Gravewit 10:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Exhales!! :) --Karlos 20:28, 10 February 2006 (CST)

Wow it's so smooth now it's inhumane! (-: -PanSola 20:06, 10 February 2006 (CST)
 * To elaborate, the speed is so fast now it's like I have extra time! I have so much time now I don't know what to do with them o_O""" This is freaky! d-: -PanSola 22:31, 10 February 2006 (CST)
 * It's... like... a real website again! :) &mdash;Tanaric 18:12, 11 February 2006 (CST)
 * So wait, is that.. bad? Do we need to go back to the other thing? ;p *eyes the 486 he's been mucking with all day.. stupid sixth-party sound cards and DMA channels...* --Nunix 10:52, 12 February 2006 (CST)

Growing pains!
GuildWiki's in a unique place right now. There really hasn't been another wiki of its type that has been so huge, so successful, and so beloved by its community. Everyone really cares about it, and that has caused quite a bit of tension in the last few months.

Recently, Phil (Gravewit) and Michael (Nunix) added a little splash page to suggest that IE users switch to Firefox. They had their reasons for this, but that's not really the issue; the problem, as it turns out, was that they were still thinking the wiki was just this fansite, you know? It was huge and awesome and had so much content from so many users, but.. still just a site like any other. So modifying the server code to do this splash is no big deal, within their rights, and how could anyone possibly have a problem with this?

Wow!

The thing is, this isn't just a fansite, it's a wiki. It's open to everyone to add, subtract, and modify. That is its function! And suddenly adding this new thing, which only two people could change.. well, that, as it turns out, really is a big deal.

So!

There's still two guys, two server administrators, who've got access to all that code, to the hard drive. That's not going to change, and they maintain the right to do something like this in the future. However!


 * Phil and Michael realise that they have the ability to do anything they wish to the GuildWiki, but they choose to do only those things either:
 * 1) necessary for the maintenance of the GuildWiki, including its server and database, or
 * 2) put through some sort of community process before implementation.

We love this thing. It's huge. It's new. And there's no way it could have ever gotten here, to this place, without each and every reader and contributor. There are bound to be more growing pains as time goes on, but we hope everyone can stick with us - and each other! - to make it bigger and better. If you guys ever have any questions or issues you'd like to take up with us, please continue to do so. It's what keeps the GuildWiki the awesome resource it is. --Nunix 23:18, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

New Contributors
With the recent influx of contributors, there has been an issue with 3 or more sequential edits (see Signet of Capture history) changing only a few characters. At the very least, it would be nice for a "This is a minor edit" to be checked, and even better, "Show preview" (which even I forget a bit). Is there any obvious way to notify the newcomers to do this? - Lunarbunny 02:43, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Probably not =D. --William Blackstaff 02:51, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

As of 10/30 There has been a few changes to the Article "How to form a Guild" as of recent updates have restricted this action within Pre-Searing Ascalon City-Guest Edit: Guild Capes are no longer made in Pre-Ascalon

Issues for Debate
How categories are handled, at Category_talk:Categories, as well as proposals for new skill categorisations at GuildWiki_talk:Style_and_formatting/Skills.

The "New" skill template: Looks the same, but changes the way it's coded at Template_Talk:Skill_New.

Last but not least, right here is the debate over whether this new page makes any sense. I'm going for a mostly informal style: This is, after all, a "Community" page for a relatively small community. Personal pronouns are the norm, first person is the view to take.

I was hoping somone would post an article on the various slang used in guild wars such as "LFG", "KD/AS", "Battery" etc


 * See Category:Glossary. ;) --Eightyfour-onesevenfive 23:16, 12 Sep 2005 (EST)

Quick page &amp; category links
On Wikipedia's main page there are some small links, linking to new pages and categories (see Wikipedia:Template:Newpagelinksmain), I find this useful; could we have a similar thing here? I converted it to GuildWiki flavour URLs here User:Skuld/new-links-testtpl --Skuld &Dagger; 19:00, 17 Sep 2005 (EST)


 * I would like to see an overhaul of the Main Page completely. The page as it is at the moment does not really look very appealing, and overall seems a bit cluttered. If you look at wikipedia the main page is very clear and concise. 06:20, 18 Sep 2005 (EST)


 * I've made the change, but since this topic relates to the Main Page directly it should be discussed on Talk:Main Page :) 06:39, 18 Sep 2005 (EST)


 * great =D ok. thanks for the tip --Skuld &Dagger; 06:53, 18 Sep 2005 (EST)