Talk:Blazing Finale

The guy on the skill picture looks scary reccomend a change.

I know him! - Trivia
That's Tony Montana! I guess he didn't really die at the end of Scarface. I knew I saw his chest moving!
 * You know, Scarface really DID end with a "blazing finale", as it were...

Does this stack with skills like Anthem of Flame to produce potential 6 seconds of burning? 217.32.166.34 23:52, 22 November 2006 (CST)
 * Unfortunately, they would both trigger at the same time, and as such AoF+BF would be redundant. --Son of Urza 16:05, 29 November 2006 (CST)

ow, add in "they're on fire!" and this will bash melee  :: S oqed Hozi ::  11:02, 8 January 2007 (CST)

Reworded the trivia section and removed the note about Watch Yourself at 0 tactics, which is not as effective after its nerf. Added note about synergy with Go for the Eyes! in its place. Hyperion`  (talk) 16:56, 31 January 2007 (CST)

This "Al Pacino" trivia note is completely contrived and subjective. I think it needs to go.--Ninjatek 12:23, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
 * I think not. Come on.  Have you seen the film?  Have you heard the discussions about it?  Here's an image link to when the "Blazing Finale" happened here.  It's very obvious actually and I'm surprised others don't see it.  Remember ANets humor as well. --[[Image:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG]]  Vallen Frostweaver  15:41, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
 * It's not "very obvious." It's way too far fetched.  Now, perhaps if Al Pacino were in a movie called "Blazing Finale," then maybe would could infer a trivia reference.  But he wasn't, and you're connecting dots that just aren't apparent enough.  Until better evidence of a link can be proven, I'm removing the note.  The Wiki requires a good and solid relationship to be apparent in order for a trivia note to be made.  You need to be able to separate subjective coincidence from something more objective. This just does not cut it.--Ninjatek 18:38, 14 September 2007 (CDT)

Pets
So what if I use a pet attack shout like Predator's Pounce? Will this trigger once the pet initiates it? If so this could be useful for B/P groups.--  Vallen Frostweaver  13:17, 2 February 2007 (CST)
 * Pet Attacks are Pet Attacks, they're not Shouts. --Xiu Kuro 14:30, 15 February 2007 (CST)

Reapplication?
Does the re-application of chants/shouts cause the burning as well?
 * No. It has to end.  --Fyren 21:39, 27 February 2007 (CST)

That guy looks like George Lopez O_o P A R A S I T I C 22:23, 23 April 2007 (CDT)

Morghan is stupid
He will only use this on himself unless you tell him otherwise, no matter what the party consists of. --Ckal Ktak 12:07, 11 July 2007 (CDT)

How does this react with Instant effect shouts?
Such as "The Power Is Yours!" or "Never Give Up!"?