GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Jink

Jink (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count &bull; RFA page)
See Forum:Bureaucrats. Because bureaucrat includes sysop tools, I'm opening an RfA prior to appointing Jink as a bureaucrat. This does not guarantee the RfA will pass. 05:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
 * Jink accepted the nomination on the forum page.

Instructions
''Please summarize the candidate's qualifications below. Add your summary as a brief bullet-point. Then go to the talkpage and explain your points in more detail.''

''To add a rebuttal to another's point, indent and add another brief bullet. Then discuss on the talkpage.''

Discussions, more elaboration on a point, lengthy counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the talkpage.

Supporting qualities

 * Nurturing and motherly
 * Married to a highly prolific editor, providing convenient contact
 * Is a dinosaur or something
 * actively plays Guild Wars
 * long-time loyal GuildWiki editor
 * long-time Guild Leader
 * lurks on IRC

Opposing qualities

 * Familial duties may prohibit availability

Neutral/Double-edged qualities

 * Tends to support Dr. ishmael in conflicts (but given that we don't see what happens behind the scenes, this may be a skewed perception)

Community Support
''Please place your signature to indicate your support or non-support. Do not argue. Also realize that this is in no way influential towards the other merits of the candidate, just a gauge of public support.''

I support this candidacy.

 * 1) ◄mendel► 11:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Yes, I'm biased, but in this situation it seems that refraining from comment would be unacceptable.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael Diablo_the_chicken.gif 14:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) See talk. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 20:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Jinkzilla will smash anyone's bases who threaten the wiki. &mdash;  Scythe   20:49, 14 Feb 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) I think I've seen several conflicts by now where she was a voice of reason, including ones with Ish iirc. --[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]]El_Nazgir  22:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) From what little I've seen, she seems reasonable, levelheaded, and likely to take the responsibility seriously. &mdash;Wizardboy777 (talk) 06:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) Of course --  Random Time  18:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) Kaede 23:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) From what I've seen in my lurking, I feel safe in supporting this RfA.  Nwash  [[Image:User-Nwash-Eyes.png|link=User talk:Nwash]] 11:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) I'm no longer an actual contributor here(having mostly moved from GW to WoW), but I do still follow GW and the site, and I have no objections here. DKS01 10:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) Cress Arvein [[Image:Cress sig.JPG]] 23:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

I oppose this candidacy.

 * 1) your sig here

I am neutral/undecided.

 * 1) Neutral The Neutral message is the only thing that has me concerned with her being a b-crat. I'd gone support, but that could be an issue - if she sides with Ishmael and not the community one day. So, I am concerned as I don't know her views on how she might handle things like that. Ariyen 17:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) See talk. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 19:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)