User talk:Auron of Neon/Archive effort

Build:E/A Gloom Farmer <-- this one. Someone grab it, or i'll lose it &mdash; Skuld 05:31, 18 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Krowman has it. Nab. -Auron [[Image:Elit Druin.jpg|19px||My Talk]] 05:32, 18 March 2007 (CDT)

DE, if you could not add builds to the list, remove them ,re-add them, it would be much appreciated. It'll save time for everyone in the long run, as I went back and backed up some of the ones you pulled from your list, only to have you reinsert them. Thanks in advance m8. - Krowman (talk • contribs)  16:14, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

We should add at least one WoH Monk and one Orders Necro, unless I missed them. --   16:42, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Also a Vermin Farmer --[[image:rollerzerris.jpg|50x19px]]   16:48, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
 * I don't think we have a very good Orders necro, but I'll double check. You could grab a WoH build if you wanted, but they're not all that great anymore, and may not make the cut to the new policy. I know I grabbed at least one Vermin farmer though; see my list. - [[Image:Candle.jpg|12px]] Krowman (talk • contribs) 16:56, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Build:Me/N Fast Casting Orders. I nabbed it, we can use it for historical reference. We should have an N/Mo and a D/N around here somewhere though... - [[Image:Candle.jpg|12px]] Krowman (talk • contribs) 16:59, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
 * My favorites were Build:N/Mo New Orders Necromancer and Build:Mo/Me PvE WoH Monk. --[[image:rollerzerris.jpg|50x19px]]   17:25, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

Build:R/E Tainted Flames should be here. Was favored for a very long time, but fell out of the metagame due to certain skills. I think it should be archived.--Nog64Talk 17:02, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

Attribution
Doesn't the history have to be preserved? &mdash; Skuld 17:11, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Wouldn't that inheirently require moving the page itself? --[[image:rollerzerris.jpg|50x19px]]   17:12, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Is there any way to move a page, without losing the original? Sort of just "clone" it. I'm not sure how it works, but possibly moving the page, then reverting the original location might work (providing moving the page doesn't clear the original's history). --[[image:GEO-logo.png]] Jioruji Derako.> 17:45, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * History, eh? Possibly. I'm fine with the build and maybe the talk page, but mostly the build itself. If the build is/was FotM, no history really needs to be preserved, as the current version is usually the best one. However, if you're concerned about preserving authorship/history of who edited it, then yeah, we'd need to Move pages at some point. But meh. Builds have that silly RAB stuff, too reminiscent of old policy. -Auron [[Image:Elit Druin.jpg|19px||My Talk]] 17:57, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * I don't care, but doesn't it violate the copyright licence not to? &mdash; Skuld 18:03, 24 March 2007 (CDT)