GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Xasxas256

Xasxas256 (talk &bull; contribs)
Xas is an active contributor, always in a good mood. He has shown great interest in the wiki and the wiki community and is doing a great job in many ways. He also lives in Australia, which means he is usually online on times when other admins might not be. -- (talk) 20:43, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I am incredibly honoured to be nominated, I've always thought of myself as a toiler here and if I am successful it may take some time to adjust to the thought of me being a sysop! I accept the nomination and would be thankful for any chance to increase my ability to help the community and hope that given the chance, I can do us proud. --Xasxas256 20:57, 8 August 2006 (CDT)

Support

 * 1) Strong Support Xasxas256 has an excellent record with GuildWiki. Add into that the benefit of an admin from a timezone that differs from most of the rest of us (better around the clock wiki coverage), and I feel that he would make an ideal admin candidate. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:11, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 2) Conditional Support. I believe Xasxas would make an incredible day-to-day administrative task force member, including deletes and vandalhunting. That said, I'm not fully convinced he possesses the character to mediate user disputes, and I hope he leaves that job to admins more suited to the task if he is appointed to the team. As always, this vote of support does not necessarily mean I think we need more admins. &mdash;Tanaric 22:45, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 3) -- [[Image:Bishop_icon2.png]] Bishop [ rap|con ] 23:39, 8 August 2006 (CDT) Xasxas256 has been a longtime contributor and has made tons and tons of solid edits. It certainly cannot hurt to have more worker bees in the admin staff.
 * 4) Strong Support &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 18:38, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 5) So long as he continues making valuable edits and keeps his pants on. --Ryard 20:45, 9 August 2006 (CDT)

Oppose

 * 1) (your vote here)