User talk:Honorable Sarah/4

Nightfall Builds
Moved to GuildWiki talk:Style and formatting/Builds

Headache
Sorry bout gettin so worked up over the past few days. Glad at least the 2 of us came to somre sort of resolution, now just hope the majority agrees. Then we can get this mess finished lol... Well hope i wasnt too bitter and angry.... i am very passionate about builds in general, and would have probably fought this war even if i didnt have a build in question. I have agreed in the past with other deletions, but the deletion of possibly vable builds which just needed the campaign opened was a bit much, especially since 2 months really isnt that far away (assuming that the game is released on the current expected schedule) Oh well its late, i mean LATE... i need ta crash. Goodnoght... after all this i need to make a Rantful was Midnight section lol... --Midnight08 01:15, 24 August 2006 (CDT)

User talk:213.17.64.49
Who are you?? A nursery teacher? &mdash; Skuld 10:11, 25 August 2006 (CDT)
 * i feel like one a lot. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 10:13, 25 August 2006 (CDT)
 * they reverted themselves, and didn't make any work for any other editors, if it keeps up you can ban them for however long you want. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 10:36, 25 August 2006 (CDT)

User's page
I may have missed something, cause I didn't know we could edit other user's pages just because. Ask Silk Weaker to place something on his page and explain why it will help, if he refuses, that is his decision, such as the anon, 68.142.-.- not registering. For now, I am placing a delete tag on his user page. -Gares 12:32, 25 August 2006 (CDT)
 * i created a blank page because it was showing up in Special:Wantedpages. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 12:34, 25 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I understand, I saw the comment and the red links are irritating. There have always been, and probably still are user pages in the Wantedpages. This does not mean other users can edit other users pages because they do not like to see a red link. There are plenty other red links in the Wantedpages that could use some attention, than worrying about a user page. This should have came sooner, but working for a living gets in the way :P -Gares 13:04, 25 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Was his showing in the Wanted Pages? I hadn't seen a user page showing in the wanted pages since the Mediawiki engine was updated to v1.7.1, so that surprises me if his page was in it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:17, 25 August 2006 (CDT)

Pia Medici
I wanted to drop you a thanks on your discussion. You're comments around the wiki have been helpful as I'm getting started on here. As a side note, I've ganked your toolbox section and used it to start one on my own user page. You're credited at the bottom. Thanks again. &mdash; Pia Medici 17:03, 25 August 2006 (CDT)
 * um, ok, i don't know what i did, but i'm glad i could help. leave a note here if there's anything else i can help with. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 17:29, 25 August 2006 (CDT)

Request for Review
Hi there, since you're the one who initially pressured me in doing this, I thought I might return the favor and ask you to review the Effective Mesmer Guide I've been writing. So, what'd you think? --Theeth (talk)   22:06, 27 August 2006 (CDT)

What is CCoBS?
I'm just curious as to what this means. I saw it in an edit summary. Thanks. Not a huge deal, since I just noticed you are on wikibreak. Ah, just have fun. =) --Vortexsam 01:27, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Going back through Sarah's contributions, it seems to mean "Comment Categories On Build Stubs". I think that Sarah doesn't like builds being in the untested category if they're still stubby. --Xasxas256 04:04, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Thanks Xasxas! Sorry Sarah for all this talking on your talk page. I figured it would be something Sarah-related; reminds me of gcc (Gares' Category Crusade). Thanks again. --Vortexsam 11:47, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 * No worries, I wonder if backtracking through Sarah's edits makes me a creepy stalker guy! --Xasxas256 17:34, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 * nope Xas.... its being a creepy stalker guy that makes you a creepy stalker guy--Midnight08 22:07, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Ha ha well thanks for sticking up for me but I was thinking about this and this and wondering if I was about to get a cop one of those userboxes too! The camera pic has been deleted so maybe it's been retired and I'm in the clear! --Xasxas256 22:22, 31 August 2006 (CDT)
 * i come back after a break and find all you people conversing on my patio. i can replace the picture if you boys would like the offical stamp. ;p --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 14:41, 5 September 2006 (CDT)

Commenting out of categories in untested builds
I stopped half-way through the builds when I commented out. There has been no new posts on the talk page for 4 days. So I will finish the commenting out soon. If you still have serious problems with that please say so now, but I want to get rid of the inconsistent half/half split of builds. --Xeeron 08:45, 2 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Just saw you are taking a wiki break, which is unfortunate. I will try to contact you ingame. --Xeeron 08:48, 2 September 2006 (CDT)
 * i'll comment on the page shortly --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 14:41, 5 September 2006 (CDT)

Ebon nightfall
It appears it was there bcos of ebon scythes if you were wondering &mdash; Skuld 10:38, 7 September 2006 (CDT)
 * then we should put C3 tags on all the professions, because they'll have expanded capabilities in nightfall. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 10:41, 7 September 2006 (CDT)
 * I'm not agreeing with the reason it was there, you didn't seem to understand why bcos of the edit comment &mdash; Skuld 10:49, 7 September 2006 (CDT)
 * i understand the reason, i just think it is insufficient for such an intrusive tag. the c3 content was two lines (actually, one and a half, since the second line was shared with the statement about staffs), and the tag was half a page. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 10:52, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

Currently Testing the Viability of…
Hey, could you just take a glance at the above named section on my page and just give me a quick review on my discussion page for each one? Basically this is my personal solution to the lack of comments in the untested section (I agree there should be more, but I'm getting tired of all the arguing about it, people just keep repeating the same things and nothing really gets done/decided). My hope is that by doing this and then asking people for feedback, not votes, I can get the builds perfected before the untested section and save the testers a lot of grief. So far it seems to be working, and I look forward to your help. Thanks in advance.--Azroth 22:41, 8 September 2006 (CDT) PS-Please read the previous discussions for each one as they may answer any questions that you have about the related build.

Build Vote
Dear Sarah, you have striked out your own vote on the Assassin Promise Nuker, and I was unsure if you wanted to keep it there or not. I wouldn't dare remove it myself. Take another look please, and if you think it is viable vote for favored :) This ad was paid by the Assassin Promise Election Committee. NightAngel 07:19, 26 December 2006 (CST)
 * Sarah is a pretty infrequent contributor these days I'm afraid (not that I'm a creepy stalker guy...), it may have been someone else who struck it out, there's been a bit of that lately or something she did a while ago. --Xasxas256 07:35, 26 December 2006 (CST)
 * From the looks of it it seemed like it was she who did it herself. At any rate, one of my sworn enemies (Rapta) decided to make it a "valid" unfavored vote (it wasn't part of the numbering scheme), hence my request here. It's not crucial. The build is very solid, is in tested already, and has plenty of favored votes to support it. NightAngel 11:03, 28 December 2006 (CST)

Eve Pendragon
Hello Sarah, who is/was Eve? Why do you miss her? What happened to her? Any ideas? Maybe one could help...? At least try to... --tapps75 21:04, 25 February 2007 (CST)