User talk:Marcopolo47/archive12

first post. having a good night? --Shadowcrest 02:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * VERRRY!! >:)--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 02:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Just a thought, but would it help to block all ip edits for an hour or so during these attacks? Lord Belar 02:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * We'd potentially be blocking good IPs too, which is half of our useful contributions. No.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 02:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't mean for any long period of time, but just during periods of heavy anon vandalizing. Lord Belar 02:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I'll deal with them individually. It would be easier to pick them out if you could put ban tags on their page so I know who the sockpuppets are.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 02:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Which, unfortunately, seems to be almost every night recently. --Shadowcrest 02:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm heading out, night all. Glad tonight's BS is over and done with. --Shadowcrest 03:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Gigathrash
Gigathrash was not unbanned properly. Could you fix that when you get a chance?--Carmine 03:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * What do you mean?--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 03:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * He PMed me in-game saying that he was banned for a short time for NPA, and someone had unbanned him, but it was glitched. He's under the impression that the ban should be removed...  You yourself posted on his talk page saying "you did your time".  Either way, you should let him know the duration of his ban if you're not unbanning him, neh?--Carmine 03:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * WTF? Not my fault, I unbanned him perfectly fine, look here!--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 03:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, nobody said it's your fault. Just sayin' he still can't edit pages...--Carmine 03:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Crap? I don't know how to handle this, I've never been in this situation before!--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 03:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Too much pressure! /suicide --Gimmethegepgun 04:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * /slitwrist--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 04:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The time stamp in the log for the ban and the ban removal are identical - and I can see in the IP block list where his IP was also banned. It may be some sort of odd glitch caused by the same timestamp on both - or it may be the auto-block on the IP (which will expire on its own after a day or two).  Try reinstating a temporary ban, wait a minute or two, then try to remove it again - that may resolve it.  If not, it should fix on its own eventually. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 06:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait - I lost my mind for a moment. If it is the auto-IP ban ... then an active admin should be able to look in the IP Block list (linked in my above post), and remove that block as well.  More than likely, that's the cause. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 06:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Hai2u
Hai! :] --Mr Ex Vandal 18:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow. You really don't know when to quit. --Shadowcrest 19:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * In case you haven't noticed, Mr. Ex Vandal, your attempt to defame my reputation has failed, as most, if not all, members here will still back me against a vandal that doesn't like me.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 20:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, Marco, I managed to scam my way into getting a reason to ban him. Check near the bottom of his talk page. Have fun with that! --Gimmethegepgun 22:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Nope, no banning. Atleast not yet. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 22:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Pfft. It's very obvious that when he asked me that it was so he could use it against me if I said yes. He even says afterwards that it's cause he hates them --Gimmethegepgun 22:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

aw man..
I missed all the fun.. -- Warwick (Talk ) (Contr. ) 22:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * What fun? --Gimmethegepgun 22:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * That vandal guy.. or is he still unbanned? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk ) (Contr. ) 22:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * He's still unbanned, Gem just refused the ban on that guy's talk page (for reasons unknown) --Gimmethegepgun 22:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * And I screwed up trying to get that too, should've answered "yes" when he asked me and gotten a clear break of policy --Gimmethegepgun 22:34, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Its cause gem knows him IRL, which is technically making her vote bias, and void.. So the ban should stand. I know politics almost as well as i know the policies of Gwiki (well) --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk ) (Contr. ) 22:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I dunno if I know him irl. I want to know before you guys do anything stupid. :P And I still stand behind my lsat nights unbanning which was done before he put the comment on his user page. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 22:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, but may i ask.. what reasoning did you have for the unban? though as far as i can see, he was provoking marco, but he had done nothing to directly break the GW:NPA --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk ) (Contr. ) 22:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * He didn't break a policy so htat's one reason. The improtant reason was that he was far less disturbing when he was unsing the account instead of the millions of IPs, which he started to use again once he was blocked. Unblocking him helped the wiki more. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 22:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thats true, but we cant let him think he can get away un punished.. or other people will start breaking the rules and use ip accounts.. One inspires many. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Talk ) (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Contr. ) 22:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ifit gets to that we can block AOL etc. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 22:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You block aol you block me =/ --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Talk ) (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Contr. ) 22:56, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you have to use it? -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 22:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * They're my internet service provider.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Talk ) (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Contr. ) 22:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * lol, AOL is the IE of internet providers --Gimmethegepgun 23:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * And btw leave Gem out of this, I don't know him IRL. --Mr Ex Vandal 23:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, we've figured. You're quite clever by the looks of you, as you've managed to insult people and patronise them without breaking the GW:NPA. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Talk ) (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Contr. ) 23:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm flattered. I wasn0t insulting people btw :( --Mr Ex Vandal 23:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, now that everyone is reading this page, I'll say this. If Mr Ex behaves according to policy then he'll stay unbanned (I'll keep eye on the block list :) ) but any personal attacks etc will warrant a ban. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 23:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)