Talk:Alliance Faction

The phrase "their faction's territory" is possesive. The apostrophe belongs there. --Crasher 01:45, 1 May 2006 (CDT)

Faction transfer..
I have ben in more FF runs than I'd like to admit, yet, I have not seen a single alliance member (Komalis Protectors, HzH owners) stop at 5K to go deposit. We always go for the big 10 and if you lose a few faction points here or there, big deal. An FF run takes 2-3 minutes. This is not to say that no one deposits at 5k, this is to say, it's not worth putting as a directive in the article. Let people deposit at 5 or 10 or 7.3. --Karlos 04:31, 28 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Well when you're in an alliance battle and you're at 9.5k faction, the people I usually do it with will save 750 faction by making a quick stop at the guild hall and putting in 5k. Perhaps I should have worded it better or something, oh well. :) Also I am not quite sure what you mean by one-to-one? Do you mean any faction transferred gets put straight into the alliance's pool, or something else? --Talonz 04:42, 28 June 2006 (CDT)


 * It didn't used to be one to one. It used to be that 5000 faction would transfer to a smaller number for you alliance (back when it was called Alliance Standing). So, this is why this note is relevant. It means if you put in 5000 faction, you will raise the alliance faction by 5000.
 * For AB it would make sense, but there is a whole world of faction farmers out there who do not go through AB. The notes on transferin faction before hitting the 10k limit should go into Kurzick Faction and Luxon Faction anyway. --Karlos 04:52, 28 June 2006 (CDT)
 * So that explains it. For someone who isn't familiar with the history of it, it sounds irrelevant. Thanks for clearing that up! The phrase "one-to-one" still doesn't seem to fit based on what it means though but not a big deal. Off to sleep, goodnight. ^^ --Talonz 12:57, 28 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Use any wording you find more suitable. --Karlos 18:31, 28 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Okay I did, hope that isn't too bad. --Talonz 02:45, 29 June 2006 (CDT)

Kurziks in Cavalon?
This article implies that it is possible for the Kurziks to take Cavalon or vice-versa. I thought that the battle lines and therefore the outposts could only swing 5 deep either way? --Crasher 16:21, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * there was a time when the battle lines were pushed so far back that Unwaking Waters was the only luxon controlled outpost in the southern sea. it was really interesting to see that one circle of red surrounded by blue as far back as Gyala. as for kurzicks in cavalon. it would seem posible, since Anet went to the trouble to put kurzick soldiers outside cavalon. hold Ctrl and look for them while scraping the edge of the outpost. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 17:42, 11 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Does anyone know how deep control has been confirmed to go on each side? -- Gordon Ecker 00:24, 12 July 2006 (CDT)
 * if we go by the presense of kurzick/luxon soldiers, then Saint Anjeka's Shrine at the far edge of the kurzick territory, and Eredon Terrace at the far edge of luxon territory. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 10:24, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * from Talk:Kurzick-Luxon_border: In theory it is possible, but do to the fact that the deeper into a territory, say the Kurzick territory, the battlefield maps change, giving the Kurzicks a greater advantage to win in this example. -Gares 10:36, 12 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I think we should keep track of how far faction control has been confirmed to extend. -- Gordon Ecker 02:01, 14 July 2006 (CDT)