Talk:Weapon details

This isn't the same as item details and should be a seperate article.
 * I agree. I propose a detailed list broken down into two catagories: ranged and melee weapons. The ranged would include bows, truncheons, wands, staves, anything that damages at a distance. Melee would consist of the main 3 types: swords, axes, and hammers. Each type should include a brief definition (no more that 1 paragraph) explaining a bit about each type. I.E, swords and axes attack fast, but do much less damage than hammers; certain weapons require two hands (prohibiting use of a shield, etc. followed by a list of weapons from that type (I.E, butterfly sword, short sword, tribal blade, etc)--Jackel 09:59, 13 Jul 2005 (EST)
 * Also, does anyone agree that "weapons" and "weapon details" should be the same article? I am starting with most needed article, and don't see why these should be separate..--Jackel 11:46, 13 Jul 2005 (EST)

In my opinion (judging from the way the wiki has grown so far) Weapon should describe what a weapon is, Weapons should list weapons (perhaps in the way you suggested), Category:Weapons should categorize weapons (as indeed it does already) and Weapon details should describe what information you'd expect to find in a weapon article's taxobox. In other words, I don't think that this page should attempt to list weapons in the way suggested Jackel, take a look at Skill details for an example of how a details page should look :) 22:29, 15 Jul 2005 (EST)