GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/I am 161.88


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

I am 161.88 (talk &bull; contribs)

 * User:I am 161.88 refused the nomination.

I am 161.88 doesn't need any introduction. I am surprised he hasn't been made an admin already. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 15:48, 3 June 2006 (CDT)

Further explanation on the request of Karlos: I am 161.88 has been on the wiki for at least as long as I've been here, which would be from October 2005. It is really hard to quantify the contributions of someone who has been active for that long, and in 161.88's case it is even harder because he has contributed under various usernames. He is an avid Special:Recentchanges watcher, not only keeping an eye out for vandals, but helping new users with their tasks and correcting pages to fit with the various stated and unstated policies in the wiki. He is one of the few non-admins here who has his finger squarely on the pulse of the community. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 16:54, 3 June 2006 (CDT)

Other usernames: User:161.88.255.140 (contribs), User:161.88.x.x (contribs, discontinued because of a login bug)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I decline. I am starting to play some other games, and will be spending less time in GW until the next campaign is released. --I am 161.88 12:39, 5 June 2006 (CDT)

Support

 * 1) I wasn't sure who you were! Username changes and numbers are a formidable combo &mdash; Skuld   17:39, 3 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 2) I would guess he already is. sure is acting like one. Foo.

Oppose

 * 1) I am User:I am 161.88, and I strongly opppose this highly opinionated and stubborn person ever becoming an admin.  --I am 161.88 12:39, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 2) (your vote here)

Neutral

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.