GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Randomtime

Randomtime (talk &bull; contribs)
I never thought I'd do this but, someone's comment about too few admins realy hit home. I'm on the wiki every day, improving and reverting and policy abiding/understanding. If you belive I'm up to the job, i'm offering my time and the ability to use it more effectivly RT | Talk 21:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
 * As I was the one who nominated myself, I accept! RT | Talk 21:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Very friendly, incredibly fast, and very helpful. Strong support. X Deity X  [[Image:xdeityx.png]] 21:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) RT | Talk - RFA 21:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Behind you all the way, bro. X Deity X [[Image:xdeityx.png]] 21:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Cress Arvein 21:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Plenty of good contributions--[[Image:Chris1645.JPG]] 21:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Ya.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 21:43, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Changed my mind, contributions list is pretty good. --[[Image:MrExVandalSig.png|Mr Ex Vandal]] Mr Ex Vandal 21:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you all! RT | Talk - RFA 21:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Go for it, RT--- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]] -- (s)talkpage 21:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks viper RT | Talk - RFA 21:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Well, I can definitely say he knows the policies. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 21:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I lolled RT | Talk - RFA 21:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Lots of contribution, prwns vandals, good attitude... and he has a derv named Omg Bananas with a Banana Scythe! How could he be bad with that?? ;) -- Shadow crest   21:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The Banana Scythe does it --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]] -- (s)talkpage 21:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It certanly does. I did Unwaking Waters not relising I was still weiding it. RT </B>| Talk 07:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Can't find any problems with this user that would warrant opposing. Certainly very active/vigilant, good knowledge of policy, knows his way around the wiki. Lord of all tyria 21:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I keep seeing you around, and can't say a bad word of you even if I think really hard. As I see it you're always honest, you'd do a good job. --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] -- talkpage 21:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Haven't seen to much of him, but that's because he has an unobtrusive signature. Besides, MP and Entropy can't both be wrong![[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png]]<font color="#4682b4">Entrea Sumatae  <font color="#4682b4"> [Talk]  23:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I'm not doing this for the lulz.[[Image:Ereanorsign.jpg]]<strong style="color: black;">reanor 04:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) (your vote here)

Neutral

 * 1) Dunno. --[[Image:MrExVandalSig.png|Mr Ex Vandal]] Mr Ex Vandal 21:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Helpful! RT </B>| Talk - RFA 21:27, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Let me check your contribs, vote can change. --[[Image:MrExVandalSig.png|Mr Ex Vandal]] Mr Ex Vandal 21:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, if you vote for someone, you have to know what they do, or you can't say wheither you support or not. RT </B>| Talk - RFA 21:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * That's not necessarily true. The whole neutral section is to show that there are users who don't know this person. My impression is that it is preferred to have admins whose contributions are significant enough that people can express support. Voting neutral seems to mean that you don't think they should be an admin but you don't really think that they shouldn't for a particular reason because you don't know them. Still, one has to consider how new the voters are and what their recent contributions and activity on wiki are. &mdash;<font color=#ff44aa>♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 21:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * That is more than a good point! RT </B>| Talk - RFA 21:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm, <500 edits in main, talk, GW, and GW talk name spaces (that's <500 for each separately), but most of them from the last 2-3 months, so activity currently seems to be ok. No participation on policy pages and policy talk pages is what I'm concerned about. Seems like a decent guy from what I've seen on talk pages- -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 23:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)