GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Isk8

Isk8 (talk &bull; contribs &bull; Edit Count)
I would like to nominate Isk8 for adminship, we always need more admins, and I think Isk8 is ready for this task. RT | Talk  10:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
 * I am actually quite shocked that I was nominated. Ever since I joined this online community mid last year, I tried my best to abide by all the communities rules, help out as much as possible, and help revert vandalism.  I've also been trying to improve my wiki skills as much as possible, and in the time I've been here, I think I've accomplished all this.  It has always been one of my aspirations since I've been here, to become an admin, and not by nominating myself.  Now that I find myself nominated, I'm not quite sure what to make of it.  I will reluctantly accept the nomination.  I am not sure if I am ready for the responsibility, if I were accepted, but I am surely willing to give it everything I have. And though my time on the wiki has been shorter than usual the past couple weeks due to work, I will be back to my normal activity next week. I'll leave it at this, to avoid an excessively long paragraph. (And thanks to RT for the nomination, I appreciate it.)

Support

 * 1) He's reliable and a good editor, he'd be a good addition to the admin team. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 11:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) ^ ^ what he said--[[Image:Cobalt6.jpg|50x19px]] - (Talk /Contribs ) 14:41, 13 April 2008 (EDT)

Oppose

 * 1) At one point I would've jumped all over this guy in support, he was once a fantastic contributor, but as of late he's been comparatively quiet. Over the course of the last few months I feel like I never ever see any contributions from him that benefit the mainspace. This isn't an insult, by any means. If his activity picks up to what it once was he'd totally be worth the adminship. --Powersurge360 18:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * As was already stated, I have been really busy with work lately, as well as being sent out for support help to another store. That is the reason for my recent absence.  I can assure you that my activity on the wiki is going to be back.  -- [[Image:Isk8.png]] Sk8  (T / C)  15:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm voting on what is available to me in the present, and with present contributions and such, it's still an oppose. As I understand, Entropy only looks at these as opinions, not as democratic votes and will take that into consideration, as such, this will either stay an "Oppose" vote until the contributions go up, or it'll be archived as such and won't matter. Best of luck with adminship though, and again, I don't mean any disrespect. --Powersurge360 03:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Neutraling for now.. I'll be watching him.. >_>. And I've seen recently that he hasn't had very much activity (as far as i've seen; at least). Though that might be because somthing like his computer is broken? I don't know; but neutraling for now. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 11:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * From Isk8's talkpage: "Ok yall... I'm heading out in about 15. I'll be on most likely a little bit throughout the next week, but don't count on much.". I think that explains why he isnt as active right now--Cobalt | <font color="Green">Talk</B>  11:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Don't know candidate well enough atm, will do some research and form a more concrete opinion. But basically, not the first choice of candidate that came to mind for me. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 22:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Need more knowledge, too.[[Image:Ereanorsign.jpg]]<strong style="color: black;">reanor 18:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)