Talk:Warrior Norn armor

charr hide armor much?


 * Kinda, but completely diffrent... --84.24.206.123 16:00, 28 August 2007 (CDT)


 * I can see the resemblance in the male version but the female version looks more unique. Female version is rather nice I have to say. The male version doesn't look as good. SavageX 16:11, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

Omg. The helmet! Not that disgussting helmet!!...again!!!


 * Again with those lame horns... Sirocco 21:00, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
 * It would make my warrior look fat :( --Blue.rellik 21:17, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
 * News: All Warriors already are fat. =P--Darksyde Never Again 02:10, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
 * BLASPHEMY! MADNESS! --Blue.rellik
 * Sparta. They should have tried harder with the armor. Some of these obvious reskins are just freaking terrible. Especially Warrior Monument Armor. Sirocco 07:05, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Actually when you compare the male norn with the charr hide, the norn is a tad slimmer, and there are some other noticable differences. The detail is also much better on the norn.--Dice 15:42, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * I was hoping for a armour that was more similar to the 15k Glads one. I mean norns don't wear much so why do their armour cover so much? It should be illegal for a GW armour to cover a lot of the body --Blue.rellik 22:00, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * theres no way its like charr hide, it has spikes on the other shoulder, complete difference!--Jafar The Swift 20:30, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
 * @ Blue.rellik : I actually like how it covers the whole body, it lives up to its armor vallue , unlike in other games where women wear a steel bra. @ Jafar : It is Charr mate , just take a good look and resemble them. - And now for myself , personally i think this is the best EotN armor , i dont like it allot but if i'd have to choose between all of them i'd choose the Norn. --Oremir 19:30, 8 September 2007 (CDT)\
 * The females seems to be a reskin of the Charr Hide armor, but the male is most obviously a warrior ancient armor with a sunspear helm.
 * Mmk... Neither of these is a reskin. Looking at the pauldrons gives it away right off the bat. Male ancient armor has really saggy pauldrons that don't really emphasize your shoulders, while these ones make them look huge. Ancient is also lacking in any spikes whatsoever. For the female set, yes, it does look very similar to charr hide, but the pauldrons are, again, completely different sizes. The skirts are also composed differently, and the spikes on the shoes are at different angles. yes, this armor set is similar to others, but still different.--65.103.233.201 00:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

The male facing
Braveheart anyone? THEY CAN NEVER TAKE OUR FREEDOM!!! Phalmatticus 17:48, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

yeah, the braveheart face rules.

when i first looked at it i tought... BRAVEHEART!!!!11!!!, now i am heavily farming norn points, too bad for helmet, my warrior has lame hair... ~ Abbadon

Is there a face painting for female? If not then I have wasted a good amount of time getting norn points. -Ajc2123 10:59 Eastern

materials are completely diffrent than here

it need monstrous fangs, monstrous claw and iron to make them not fur

Facepaint makes you look like football fan..

I guess I should get it then, my warrior's current mix makes him look like a linebacker.--Isaac The Dark

HOO HOO HOO FOOTBALL!!! :) Wyvern Stonehead 23:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Wyvern Stonehead

The Icon for the male warrior helmet at the crafter and the prerelease sneek screen depict a different helmet than what you guys have in the page, which one is correct? (68.63.233.200 15:53, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

I heard something about the sword helmet being different than the other ones, or its just the icon (?) ~ Abbadon321

it is either wear the helmet and not have the facepaint or have the paint and dont wear the helmet? or both?

Materials?
Why does this armor set require so much rare crafting materials? Others only need a little fur but this need a bunch of expensive claws and fangs? Not fair :( 70.247.245.236 19:01, 9 September 2007 (CDT)