User talk:Dirael

"that was a formatting fix"
What? 23:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * He typed "#..." rather than "# (your vote here)" . Besides, I doubt he'd oppose someone who he said he'd probably promote on IRC. --Shadowcrest 23:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * But the fact remains that he was the one who posted it. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 00:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Then what would be the point of moving it down and not signing it a second time? Not to mention Ishmael added it too. --Shadowcrest 00:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The original "#(your vote here)" was removed by Shadowphoenix, after which Auron added the "#..." instead. I simply moved it back to the bottom because other people had ignored it and left it up in the middle of everything.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 02:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I belive I see. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 03:53, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Gazooks, I missed that. I'd thought that Auron's first edit was the moving. He's been watching the page all along, but not indicating any opinion. Weird. --mendel 05:03, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Auron's opinion was very clearly stated on IRC the other day: Phalange is a "good friend" who Auron knows would "do the right thing for the wiki". Which, as we've seen, means we can't have fun anymore.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 13:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Interesting that Phalange has stated on Banjthulu's talk page that Auron is no friend of his. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 13:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Wounding Strike/Reaper's Sweep
Which is better (usually)? Reaper's Wounding --Shadowcrest 01:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I need these to prove to my friend that one certain imba skill is better than the other, btw. --Shadowcrest  02:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * There's... no real comparison. Wounding is currently better than Eviscerate. Reaper's wasn't even in the same league before Wounding got buffed, now it's severely underpowered (comparing it to the severely imba wounding). Both need to be removed from the game, but there's no real argument for reaper's anymore :p - Auron 02:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * For secondary dervishes who feel like wielding a scythe, Reaper's Sweep is great. I used it on my Scythe Thumper. But Wounding is altogether better if you have access to enchants. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 02:12, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed... especially in GvG, the bleeding (which automatically covers the deep wound) couples well with your ranger spreading poison to generate an excessively large amount of degen. -- [[Image:Ruricu-sig.png]] ( Talk • Contribs) 02:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * He called you all retarded. But then, he supports 2 sups per character (even for SR and the like), so don't take it personally :P --Shadowcrest  02:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

poll
If I made a random guild, would you join? Yes No Need answers by noon EST (GMT -5) July 13th. --Shadowcrest 03:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Luxon or Kurzick? [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 03:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Why did you leave [Ni]? :O --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] - talk 12:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Because he wanted to join me because he doesn't have any idea. --Hel llb rin ger 13:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I left because I needed R3. Badly :(
 * I didn't join HB.
 * Kurzick. --Shadowcrest  14:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Revert war on Legendary Sword
Hi, I know this was yesterday, but apparently this is still an issue. Don't engage in a revert war, even if you think the information entered is false. If your undo is reverted itself, leave it be -- contact the person reverting (i.e. the one repeatedly putting in said false information) and/or discuss on the relevant talk page. If that person continues, try to keep discussing or simply wait it out. Toodles, from your friendly neighbourhood do-goody, -- R  Phalange  20:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I was the first person to revert that info, I didn't break 1RV. (though even if I had, see point 2.)
 * We can't keep track of prices, so everyone there was just removing what could technically be construed as vandalism. Particularly since the IP in question was warned not to keep adding the same info. Letting him sit there and list prices while we twiddled our thumbs thinking "Oh no, can't break 1RV!" would have been stupid. --Shadowcrest 14:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Though I guess this has already been pointed out elsewhere. --Shadowcrest  14:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)