Talk:Spawning Power


 * Am I the only one who sees Ritualist primary Minion Masters replacing Necromancer primary MM's? Explosive Growth, Boon of Creation, and Attuned Was Songkai all make for an incredible minion mastery combo.


 * Example; Using the above skills, you summon two Bone Minions out of a new corpse. The nearest foe (nearby) is struck for 106 damage, and you gain a total of 5 energy. (+18 from Boon of Creation (Two minions) and Attuned was Songkai will reduce the energy down to 12.5ish... lets assume it rounds up to 13.  Basically, even though the minions are a lower level, you can be extremely consistent in your summons, since you gain energy for making a minion, not when something dies.  Also, very high spammage of Death Nova can help to make you even better.  Just saying... I might have to replace my MM, not something that seems very fun! =p


 * Yeah I already have a Rt/N MM build setup. Spawning Power will not make minions attack with more damage (higher level) but it does give them much more health then they will ever obtain from a Necro primary.  And a ritualist can easily manage the energy required for mm'ing with its spawning power skills.  Not sure whether I want to use Attuned Was Songkai or Animate Flesh Golem, however.  I'm thinking attuned would be more effective in alliance battles but Flesh would be better in smaller arenas or PvE. | Chuiu 13:11, 5 April 2006 (CDT)

For the record: spawning power does not affect pets. If you are still unconvinced, try for yourself: Create a PvP Ritualist with Spawning Power on at least 12. Take an elder companion (480HP) to the Torch of Hexes on the PvP island. If I remember correctly, it will degenerate 4hp/sec. Now take the time your companion needs to die. That should be exactly 120 seconds. Move around while waiting, else your companion will stray from the torch and have the hex dispelled after 20 seconds. --Nilles 19:08, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Are there still ppl who think spawning power affects pets? o_O""" - 19:28, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Well, I deleted a paragraph from the ritualist guide which was referring to it. --Nilles 20:00, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Sigh, when things like this happens, I comfort myself by considering it a natural effect of having a population diverse in many different ways. - 20:02, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Googling this subject gives conflicting answers. I would call it not confirmed, but debated and disagreed upon.--Arcady 20:14, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Despite common belief, google is not the answer to everything and basing yourself on an authority (fansite BWE reports) is not going to help. Here is the solution: reproduce the experiment. That takes about 5 minutes. --Nilles 20:19, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * THe burden of proof should be on the side who claims Spawning Powers affect pets. Pets are in no way created, however you interpret it.  any claim that they are affected by Spawning Powers need to submit proof.  Regardless, we already ahve counter proof that it doesn't affect pets anyways.  If you googled and found conflicting answers, please show us any test results used to suppport the claim that Spawning Powers affect pets from those google results. - 23:09, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * He submitted this link to a Beta Weekend article as being arguable. The line he is probably referring to is PvP Beta Weekend "Spawning Power makes these spirits tougher, but they also strengthen Rangers’ pets and rituals as well." It could be that Arcady is just mistaking outdated Beta information for claimed truth or just doesn't care about either being true. I want to know what to do with the part of the article now. I am reluctant to revert it again without consent. --Nilles 07:34, 19 June 2006 (CDT)


 * That particular link (dignews) is WAY too weak an argument, AND we have explicit test results showing pets are not affected. I think for now, the wiki's official stance on the matter should be Spawning Powers does not affect pets, and consider the opposite claim as common misconception (as opposed to "not confirmed, debated and disagreed upon"). - 08:12, 19 June 2006 (CDT)