User talk:876578

Me/N Signet of Midnight
Heya there, moving articles is simple, see the tabs at the top (edit, history, move, and watch) just use the watch one :) However for the Me/N Signet of Midnight to be "moved" into the unfavored builds category, the articles name isn't changed (which is what a move does), the category Category:Unfavored builds just needs to be added. Hope that helps --Xasxas256 22:15, 14 June 2006 (CDT)

Classes

 * A Warrior with 7 or less tactics: I run 16/13 wep/str sometimes, and sometimes with spare points WY, is this bad?
 * A Warrior with less than 530 base HP: endure works wonders ><
 * A Ranger with less than 13 expertise, or no other form of energy management (Marksman's Wager, Melandru's Shot, etc): not all builds
 * An Ele without dual attunement (Fire Attunement & Elemental Attunement): Seriously, not everyone is a fire nuker


 * So if you're playing a mesmer, right off the bat, you're not a noob, unless shown otherwise.: heh, complete bias

Probably being pedantic but.. &mdash; Skuld 13:56, 26 July 2006 (CDT)


 * 16/13 weap/str leaves you with 75 less HP, a minor increase in weapon damage, and only dolyak+endure/defy pain as tanking options. It's better to avoid damage altogether than just reduce it. Plus, 16/13 is for PvP.
 * Endure alone doesn't allow you to "solo" tank. Only with defy will it keep your HP up. The ideal tank needs minimal healing from a monk. The monk should protect the weak, not the one with 100+ armor.
 * Without 13 expertise or such, you'll either be a ranger without energy, or a ranger that pokes monsters occasionally
 * An ele better be a fire nuker or they're not going to get into many groups. Dual attunement works for Air and Water as well. But then again, only truly organized groups (aka not PUGs) make the best use of Earth and Water eles. (Earth eles should use Glyph of Energy, but that's beside the point here)
 * If you're willing to try and stay with the mesmer, you're already above the typical whammo

"Mmm, yes, I also agree, shallow and pedantic." --Peter Griffin

I'm sure 80% of today's youth did not know pedantic was a word until Family Guy came along. --8765 17:56, 26 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Endure - i meant if you were getting low with no healing coming.
 * Expertise - no wai!!
 * Mesmer - have you ever taking a mesmer build with 0 attributes in everything? god the idea off someone else, took 0 attribute skills and got complimenting on my mesmerising :)


 * Never watched family guy &mdash; Skuld 14:20, 28 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Unless you took a 600 dmg lightning orb spike from a mob + a boss, you shouldn't need endure to cover a lack of heal because you should be able to survive a long time without any healing. Stances and +armor buffs are key. Sure endure is a 1-skill life saver, but you shouldn't be getting into life-threatening situations often.
 * So if you're "no wai" means an agreement with the necessity of 13+ expertise, then you're claiming the builds you mentioned (without any direct references or examples) are mostly flawed. (Most of the vetted rng builds, imo, suck. For PvE anyways)
 * You might as well be a W/Me if you're going 0 attribute build. Although you lack alot of energy, the extra armor should allow you to survive long enough. Either way, you're still way below par with 0 attributes.

Either just you, or all of the UK has led a shelter life by not watching Family Guy. --8765 12:59, 31 July 2006 (CDT)


 * this truly dissatisfies me. i have seen many people tear down W/Mo's before, and i have heard plenty of people voice they're opinions on expertise, mesmers, and fire eles.  but i am completely siding with skuld on this one. 8765, these are all opinions that you have, but they are simply wrong.  Noob is a harsh word, and i would never call someone that.  It is the players choice as to what skills he uses.  it is the players choice as to what his attributes are set at.  This article is purely annoying, and i find it quite offensive.  I'm sure others will too.  Do not hesitate to respond.  you are clearly a person who is fond of voicing they're oppinions.


 * Another thing: I have never watch family guy either. --Fiznuckin Biznitch 01:16, 6 August 2006 (CDT)
 * this is a user page, oppinions are expected. have a nice day ;) --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 01:18, 6 August 2006 (CDT)

--8765 11:04, 6 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Anyone can make choice and decisions on how they run their character. However, as far as effectiveness goes, there is unwritten standards, much like anything else in the world, that if you don't meet, you're simply not as effective or useless as you could be. The world is very competitive, not just in video games. Granted, to an extent, it's pointless to be competitive in video games other than for recognition.
 * Also, this article only applies for PvE. PvP is completely different, and requires its own article. However, if everyone actually followed some standard, PvE would be so easy, that eventually no one would actually play it. The fact is PvE is easy, and people are getting by by running charatcer builds that are just plain terrible. The goal of this is to make PvE far more challenging. So much more challenging, that around 60% of the current players and groups, simply would not get past the first few areas of the game.
 * So comes the player's choice of skills and attributes. Sure you can run anything you want, that's because most of it works because PvE is too easy. The player's choice wouldn't be called wrong, but rather a poor decision. And upon repeat of this poor decision, they're called a noob.
 * On the term "noob," such a term is already abused so much, it's lost much of its intented meaning. But as far as this article goes, if a newbie (aka a new player to the game) makes one the listed mistakes, hopefully they'll learn from it. If not, then they would be coined as a noob. There are also further degrees of "noob," but that's not exactly relevent to this article.
 * "8765, these are all opinions that you have, but they are simply wrong" Since when can opinion be wrong? They can be simple, but never wrong.
 * If I keep mentioning Family Guy, perhaps it would be wise to find out what Family Guy is.