GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/RoseOfKali (2)

== RoseOfKali (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count &bull; RFA page) ==

For a long time now, RoseOfKali has been one of the most active remaining editors on GuildWiki. Although Rose has occasionally gotten into altercations with other editors in the past, they arise not out of personal feelings but out of an earnest desire for the improvement of the wiki. I am confident that Rose will be able to responsibly use the sysop tools on a regular basis.
 * As an aside, image work and such might help her spend some of her time in Ukrainian captivity. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 20:24, September 7, 2009 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


 * I accept, and I finally have regular access to the internet again. RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.png]] 11:02, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

Qualification
''Please summarize the candidate's qualifications below. Add your summary as a brief bullet-point. Then go to the talkpage and explain your points in more detail.''

''To add a rebuttal to another's point, indent and add another brief bullet. Then discuss on the talkpage.''

Discussions, more elaboration on a point, lengthy counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the talkpage.


 * loyal
 * Constantly working on improving the wiki
 * An unheralded dedication to GuildWiki in general
 * respected by the community
 * likely to be good at enforcing policies
 * An ability to move beyond conflicts and not hold grudges
 * Upholds and constitues (?) proper GuildWiki procedure.
 * helps editors to "get it right"
 * can update templates
 * Lots of free time
 * not likely to be good at mediating
 * Has tended to, in previous times, be somewhat of a drama magnet
 * User has had conflicts with others in the past
 * has had AGF problems with "bad" suggestions in the past
 * can usually see other person's view once discussion gets going
 * Occasional reactionary opposition to new methods
 * accepts compromises []
 * Very tenacious in content debates

Community Support
''Please place your signature to indicate your support or non-support. Do not argue. Also realize that this is in no way influential towards the other merits of the candidate, just a gauge of public support.''

I support this candidacy.

 * 1) Nwash 07:28, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)   &mdash; Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 07:45, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Jimbo321 08:56, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) -- [[Image:merty_sign.gif]]-- ( talk ) 09:15, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Random Time 
 * 6) &mdash; Balistic  23:37, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) --[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]]El_Nazgir 15:02, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Cress Arvein [[Image:Cress sig.JPG]]
 * 9)  Jink  16:56, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) A_F_K_sig_2.jpg A F K When Needed 16:47, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

I oppose this candidacy.

 * 1) &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 15:49, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

I am neutral/undecided.

 * 1) your sig here