User talk:Skuld14148

new +

Mo/W Sword Spike Monk
Skuld, can you please give that monk build a few runs in RA and 12vs12? If you didn't enjoy that afterwards, I'll stfu, but please give it a chance. ~ Nilles (chat) 05:58, 28 June 2006 (CDT)
 * I'll try, can't get on any time soon tho &mdash; Skuld  06:48, 28 June 2006 (CDT)

Request for comment
Please see the comment I added here: Talk:Energy Drain about the anon edit. I think he is actually correct. --Draygo Korvan (Yap) 10:15, 30 June 2006 (CDT)

Shields
Feel free to format the promotional shields or whatever else you wanted to point out into their own table. I just formatted what was already there. But do not forget that some of the promo shields are no coke items but come with the GW 2006 editions which are Prophecies after all. --Long 13:01, 30 June 2006 (CDT)

Builds and testing
Do you always vote before bothering to test builds? It's getting annoying. - Greven 11:31, 30 June 2006 (CDT)

(from Wrzosek)
thx ;) &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wrzosek (talk &bull; contribs) 15:03, 1 July 2006.
 * np :) &mdash; Skuld  10:12, 1 July 2006 (CDT)

Captain Rujiyo
Why the hell do you keep deleting my contribution about Captain Ruyijo, you need something there for people to expand on. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.68.77.62 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * FYI: From the deletion logs, it appears that Skuld has only deleted it once.
 * In most cases, the wiki will not maintain articles for characters that do not exist in the game. When the character is introduced, the article can be created at that time.  It's a long-standing tradition in the wiki to prefer red "broken links" over non-informative place-holder articles.  The red link makes it easier to spot that the data is still required if/when someone encounters the NPC in-game. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 09:23, 1 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Meh, fine. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.68.77.62 (talk &bull; contribs) 15:29, 1 July 2006.

monobook.css
In your monobook.css you have a selector "a[title="User:"]". As you have seen, that will not work. The only way it would work is if the ":" were a hyphen. Then you could match it like "a[title|="User"]". As it is, there isn't any way to partially match the "User:" portion of the title with CSS alone. You would have to write some javascript to loop through every anchor element on the page and apply a new class to each anchor with a title that matches your criteria. -- James Sumners 09:46, 3 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Thanks for the info, wondering why that never worked :) &mdash; Skuld  10:23, 3 July 2006 (CDT)

image fixed
Yeup sorry about that, funny you got to it as I was working on it, glad you are awake :) ... should be correct on this one. Have you looked at the mesmer skills page at all btw? I been meaning to fix, but it's sooo mangled. I did fix the warrior one while back with same problems.

Thanks for the note about the image. - ShmEk
 * No problem :) You mean the "Prophecies Campaign" bits? I don't like those at all! &mdash; Skuld  08:03, 4 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I should say I would love SMALL icons that match the skills to their definitions and information. However, the attempt at that, which is presently on the page, looks like a mess and ruined the formatting on the tables.  Like a bad cut and paste job from some other websites tables.


 * Been bugging me for weeks since I ran into it. When I think about fixing it, I am always a bit daunted knowing it'll cost me more time then I expect.  Suppose I could do one table at a time, but the transition on that would make yet a 3rd type of formatting for the tables, BUT should come out clean like the original version with a new column of the corresponding icons.- ShmEk 09:22, 4 July 2006 (PDT)

Pure Beards Forums
Do you guys gave one yet? I can host one on my own webspace -- let me know. --Jack  18:06, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
 * As can I but they are so unorganised :/ keep bugging them! &mdash; Skuld  01:59, 5 July 2006 (CDT)

Oops - sorry - edit overlap
Sorry about that. You deleted ROTFL just as I was adding the tag, so my edit restored it after you deleted it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 09:35, 7 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Too slow! :p &mdash; Skuld  09:37, 7 July 2006 (CDT)