Category talk:Green Number

Anyone particularly opposed to deleting this category and every article in it? --Fyren 17:04, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes to deleting the category, yes to deleting Green Numbers, yes to deleting Increase Peaks, no to deleting Increase (it is huge and maybe not perfectly worded, but has a point), no to deleting Relative Increase. Imho, delete all articles, but combine the useful stuff of Increase and Relative increase into one article (and give that article a better name). --Xeeron 14:31, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * What do you find useful about increase? The first two graphs are pretty and all, but I think they're kind of useless.  From the third graph and on is crap.  --Fyren 21:01, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * They grafically show the gap being produced by approximating a line with integer atribute points.... Ahhh well get it dead, I wont fight for these =P --Xeeron 16:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Ping. --Fyren 23:51, 11 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Yes to deleting everything as stated. If any good points exist within them, they should be incorporated into attribute or attribute point spending, or possibly into a new article, like skill optimization, before deletion. &mdash;Tanaric 00:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't think any of it is worth saving, but I'm restraining myself from purging it with fire in case someone else cares to move something. --Fyren 20:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)