Category talk:AB builds

Keep category?
I've suggested here that this category be removed... for one basic reason: it's pointless. I'll copy-paste what I said about AB from that page: "AB builds are a joke; Alliance Battles are randomway, with a 4-person team build at best. I've seen (literally) people using these stupidass builds in AB, and our team won in each case. A basic how-to-AB guide is fine (which would consist mostly of "CAP, DAMNIT!") but specific builds are going too deeply down a shallow lane." Feedback? -Auron  05:29, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
 * I've seen lots of terrible builds in RAs too and sometimes won in a team that's using terrible builds. But we have RA builds because there's some good RA builds regardless even if it's possible to win with some bad builds in RAs at times. AB builds can be specific, not just no res sig, I mean they can be structured for ABs which are different to any other PvP game type. I don't think ABs tend to draw many really skilled PvPers but there are some sucessful 12v12 builds regardless so I disagree with removing this cat. --Xasxas256 05:40, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
 * How is it possible to use a 12v12 build? You get shuffled into a 12 person team only having the chance to coordinate with three others. And actually, I was thinking about including RA's in the "weak categories" section, because it's random. I see Random Arena as a place to test your compatability in a group; it's almost impossible to test true group builds. Honestly, Guild Wars is crippled by people all using the same build (or at least a sickening number of them... see also: touch noobs). If we removed all "set-in-stone" builds for supposedly "random" arenas, people would be more creative, and the entire experience would be more fun. I don't see the point in using somebody else's build for a "random" experience; if someone wrote a general mesmer guide and had specifics (sections on useful skills, or perhaps "Playing a Mesmer in Random Arenas") I wouldn't mind, but making a "build" to have people copy throws creativity out the window, and in the end, reduces the skill of the players that only copy someone else's build. -Auron [[Image:Elit Druin.jpg|||My Talk]] 06:07, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
 * You could have two people with identical hands in poker yet a good player will still win more often and win bigger, not everybody can think of a new amazing build that nobody has have used before but the skill still comes from the way you play. Besides that's an intellectual question that doesn't need to be answered to justify the existence of this category IMO, although I will say that RAs will always be random because the effectiveness of the majority of builds will vary with the other builds in your random team. Should we have removed our documentation of IWAY when it was popular, fearing that more people would use it? People can use whatever build they want that's their choice not ours, we're a documentation site not big brother.


 * You can't tell me that there aren't builds that do well in ABs or RAs (proof is that in ABs you'll see people saying "need another nuker and a Blessed monk"). This category contains those effective builds. I still disagree but I'm enjoying arguing the toss :) --Xasxas256 06:40, 25 October 2006 (CDT)