User talk:PanSola

Past mistakes are moved into the User talk:PanSola/MistakeArchive

Other closed issues are moved to User talk:PanSola/Archive

You have very varied character names! =P Skuld &Dagger; 16:15, 21 October 2005 (EST)
 * Hehe thank you (-: If we ever get more character slots, Ranger primary will be Soru Pan, and Necro primary will be Sory Pan.  When Chapter 2 comes out with more professions, I'll run into the Vowel-6 bug (I consider "Y" as a vowel) >_<" -PanSola 16:19, 21 October 2005 (EST)
 * Don't the French use H as a vowel? you could use that aswell Skuld &Dagger; 16:40, 21 October 2005 (EST)
 * Well, I don't speak the silent language. Sorh?  Bah, most ppl will think it only has one sillyball!!!  (Admittedly, "Sore" already has that problem...) -PanSola 16:44, 21 October 2005 (EST)
 * This is just came in from the useless information department: H is not a vowel in French, it is a silent letter. "Hopital" is pronounced "opital" and "l'hopital" is "lopital" --Karlos 20:45, 21 October 2005 (EST)

Collector NPC Question
Any character that you cannot play as is really a NPC. I usually don't tend to put hostile enemies in this category for some dumb reason but pretty much anything can go in here. NPC=Non Playable Character.--The King Tarosian 08:15, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * That's not my question. "If handaxe is listed under axe, and axe is listed under weapon, then should we still list handaxe under weapon" is the analogy of my question. -PanSola 08:17, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

I see what your saying now, eh. Good question. One part of me says "well whats the purpose of even having an "axe" category if its just going to be in weapons anyhow" and then another part says "its better to have it under everything it can possibly go under". On this one I really can't come to a conclusion. Anyone else care to comment?--The King Tarosian 08:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * If it goes like this Weapon->Axe->Handaxe; then Handaxe should belong to the Axe which in turn belongs to the Weapon. So although the Handaxe is a Weapon it should only appear under Axe (and therefore Weapon as Axe is listed under Weapon.) Having it appear in both, (however true) is only going to lead to duplicate (pointless) links and defeat the purpose of subcategories.--William Blackstaff 08:30, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * That's exactly how it should be. An article should only be in one category of a categorization tree. Another example would be the Bestiary: Stone Summit Gnashers are only in Category:Stone Summit (which is a Subcategory to Category:Dwarves). Despite being dwarves, the Gnashers are not in Category:Dwarves, too.--Eightyfour-onesevenfive 11:12, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Actually, this has been argued back and forth before. I believe the last time I saw it, it was agreed that there was nothing wrong with them going in both categories.  But I couldn't for the life of me tell you where that discussion took place.
 * And for the dwarves, we should have Stone Summit and Deldrimore as sub-categories IMO. --Rainith 11:42, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * With respect to the specific issue of Stone Summit, I thought it's agreed that it's a political faction (not a species), including Ice Golems and the like, so it's not a sub-cat of Dwarfs. -PanSola 21:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Ha! That's cute, you think anything is ever actually decided on a Wiki.  :P  --Rainith 11:08, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Meh I don't see the point in putting them in both categories, if one category is a subcategory of the other. By putting it in the subcategory it also inherenty belongs to the category. But, no biggie, cest 'la vie. --William Blackstaff 16:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Category:NPCs
Hey, I thought of a possible way to cut down on the number of entries for the NPCs category, and since you're actively campaigning for this I figured I'd give it to you and if you want to run with it you can. Split out people who give quests into Category:Quest Givers (or something like that). That would have to (in my mind, twisted as it may be) be a sub-category of NPCs and that would then cull quite a few of the herd out of NPCs. --Rainith 14:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * That'd be a relatively unnatural one in my view. A slightly modified idea (though still not quite natural) is "Quest NPCs", which doesn't have to give out quest, but are related to quests (intermediate people that need to be talked to etc).  Anyways removing articles that are already in leaf categories needs to be agreed upon and put inot action first otherwise this new subcategory still wouldn't do any good ^^.  But thanks for the suggestion (-: -PanSola 15:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)