GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/R.Phalange

=== R.Phalange (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count &bull; RFA page) ===

-- R  Phalange  00:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

 * 1) (your vote here)

Oppose

 * 1) I don't think he deserves Admin because he hardly has any mainspace edits or helping people in talk pages of the mainspace. Also when does having more than 80% to User and User talk pages allow people to be RfA'd? Then again you did do this for yourself which I'm highly against but thats your decision to get 10 oppose before it's over. --Hel llb rin ger  01:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Though I think this user's perspective is correct, I don't think someone recently blocked for wiki disruption would make the best admin. Also, this user's sharp (for lack of a better word) attitude and frequent veiled/borderline NPA doesn't quite convince me they'd make a good adminstrator. --Shadowcrest  01:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Inlight of recent troll like actions, I oppose; however this is most likely pointless as Auron will prob. promote anyway... -- Shadowphoenix  02:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) I do not feel that this user has had enough time on this wiki for promotion. -- [[Image:Isk8.png]]  I~sk8   (T/C) 12:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Not enough experience. Cress Arvein [[Image:Cress sig.JPG]] 15:46, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) What Isk and Cress said. --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] - talk 15:54, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) The user's established history on the wiki is extremely short, and what history the user does have is (unfortunately) tainted by an issue that involved accusations of trolling, both by the user and against him/her, and a block as a result of those issues. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 16:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Only 2 mainspace edits --JonTheMon 16:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) Can't predict how R.Phalange would behave as an admin. --mendel 19:27, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) 19 days since first edit, 3 of which were spent blocked. Two mainspace edits, one of which was later reverted, and the other of which was itself a revert.  That's an awfully thin track record on which to base a campaign for permanent admin status, and even what is there of the track record isn't that good.  Quizzical 19:43, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) Simple, there are *much* better candidates..-- [[Image:merty_sign.gif]]-- ( talk ) 20:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Too little experence - not oppose as would not be a bad choice - may not be a good choice either Random Time 19:29, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Are you kidding? Not to try to break NPA, but this guy is a troll.. :| &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 19:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)