User talk:Warwick/Archive 21

For the link to my TopEnd, go to: User:Warwick/TopEnd/Talk

Clean
Well, it was near bursting point anyway (32kb is as long as my archives are allowed). So anyways, im off. laters all. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 01:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * SECOND POST!!!! --[[image:Fighterbitsjsig.jpg|19px]] Wammo--STALK MEH 11:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yaay. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 12:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Let's unclean this page :) --[[image:Fighterbitsjsig.jpg|19px]] Wammo--STALK MEH 12:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The way you said that sounded... wrong. I'll rephrase it:- Lets spam this page to bursting point. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 13:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The way I said it is just fine :P --[[image:Fighterbitsjsig.jpg|19px]] Wammo--STALK MEH 15:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It will take only a few weeks anyway.. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 16:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * better then my talk its as dead as hell :( --[[image:Fighterbitsjsig.jpg|19px]] Wammo--STALK MEH 16:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You should archive your userpage or something, it takes very long to load. About.... <--this long--> --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] -- talkpage 16:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's cuz of all those userboxes that 60% of the time phail :P --[[image:Fighterbitsjsig.jpg|19px]] Wammo--STALK MEH 16:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Your userboxes+screens do deserve a seperate page, imo. Too much load time --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 16:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * BUTBUTBUT... Meh, okay. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 17:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * What do you mean it screws with your formattiong I've copyed your last rev to User:Randomtime/sandbox and it's fine RT | Talk  18:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Really? For me its totally screwed up, my cool ppls list is in the middle of my welcome to the wiki, and all of my pics are in the navbar =/ --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

new cats
see GW:ULC, should probably be called unique instead of green. &mdash;♥Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 18:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ugh... I cant move categories, can I? Can you? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Btw, in the Category I've noted already that they're Uniques.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Unique is a more appropriate name because we tend to refer to things as unique rather than green on the wiki. There does not appear to be a way to move categories. &mdash;♥<font color=MAGENTA>Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 19:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Could we keep it like this? I've spend about 45 mins ~ doing this, and if we have to change it then I'll have to either remove all of the cats or change them all =/ --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm also thinking it might be useful to actually create categories by attribute... Category:Drops unique Domination item. Why did you feel that these categories are useful in the first place?... Moving things around to comply with ULC is better done sooner than later. We had to move all the armor articles around to conform a while ago and it was annoying. The ULC means that its easier to add the category to new articles. &mdash;<font color=#ff44aa>♥<font color=MAGENTA>Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 19:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I dont know, I just thought that it may be useful. By category may be useful, I suppose, however we could make it into a subcategory? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)