Talk:The Catacombs

Charr in the Catacombs
I'm just going from memory here; but I don't think that Vatlaaw Doomtooth actually made an appearance in the catacombs even during the quest Charr in the Catacombs. Looking at the quest walkthrough, it doesn't mention it either. Anyone else remember for certain, or have a pre-searing character to verify it with? --Barek 21:51, 12 April 2006 (CDT)
 * You're probably correct. I added that note under the assumption that the person who added him to the list was correct to begin with. | Chuiu 22:03, 12 April 2006 (CDT)

I'm not sure which update changed this but when you now bring up the mini-map ("U"), it shows a map of the catacombs as much as you have uncovered, just as the regular map would. I'm not sure how to change/edit the information on the actual page to include this so I'll leave that up to someone else. --Rei 05:15, 28 July 2006 (CDT)

Map
Just a quick update to give images of the Catacombs, now that you can actually get an accurate map of them from the U-Map. I added three images, hope they are helpful. :) ~ J.Kougar 04:39, 30 July 2006 (CDT)
 * I thought the U map always worked in there. That's how the initial maps were created right after the game came out.  It was always just the "M" map that didn't work there.  --Rainith 04:41, 30 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Note that I'm not saying your map isn't better than the other one we have listed in the article. :)  You might also want to add the links to the Maps article.  --Rainith 04:44, 30 July 2006 (CDT)

Actually the only maps I'd seen were pieced together from the compass because the U-Map didn't work, and even the article reflects the change that the U-Map started working, it just didn't have images to back it up till I added them. ;) Thanks though.  J.Kougar 05:44, 30 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Ah, you are correct. I am definately getting forgetful in my old age.  :(  --Rainith 05:48, 30 July 2006 (CDT)

No problem. ;) I'm more than likely older than you anyway, at least I seem to be when compared to the average GW player.  ;)  J.Kougar 06:00, 30 July 2006 (CDT)

???
Is it commonplace to remove a higher quality map for a lower quality one with less data on a page like this? I thought giving the best content possible was the idea behind this site, no? I thought several maps that even give the location of the collectors, NPCs, and quest data would be preferable... why are they not? J.Kougar 20:49, 2 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Images in articles should be uploaded to the wiki, not linked to external sites. --Theeth (talk)   21:23, 2 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Before I originally edited this article a few days ago, the only map provided in it was an external link to a poor quality map. I changed that.  I only put together the page that I did for the new maps I made because I had too much data, and I'd have had to add at least four images to the article, which seemed a bit excessive.  I can however, create a page on this site for all the content, if you think that would be best.  Assuming I can figure out how to make an image link to a page.  J.Kougar 21:31, 2 August 2006 (CDT)
 * if that is your map, simply upload it over the map that is there, and include your information into this article. if those are not your images, or the information is copied from somewhere else, please review GW:IMAGE before uploading it. we try to keep external links to a minimum as we can't keep their quality consistant. thanks ;) --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 21:39, 2 August 2006 (CDT)


 * No, the map I originally provided was a higher quality image. Given the amount of information though, and the fact that there are 4 image, I think it might be best to make a page on this site for that information.  Thanks.  J.Kougar 21:49, 2 August 2006 (CDT)