GuildWiki talk:Bureaucrats

why is this a separate policy from GW:ADMIN? I dont think we need separate policies for these two things. Also, you can't just decide to create something and stick the approved policy tag on it. If you feel like we need a GW:BCRAT policy, then put it up for discussion, don't just make it. &mdash;♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 23:33, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Once again, Warwick decides to do whatever Warwick wants. This "policy" is unnecessary and ought to be deleted, in my opinion. Anyone who feels differently, say so. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 00:50, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I could set it up like the AI page, but for bureaucrats. [[Image:Thoughtful-new-sig.jpg]] Thoughtful 00:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry guys, I set it up so that Special:Listusers/sysop wasn't redlinked. Then i thought that bcrat probably shouldn't be a redirect.. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png|Hello]] Warw/Wick 05:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * And so basically its a copy of GW:ADMIN with the admin powers and such put in. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png|Hello]] Warw/Wick 05:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The link for a bcrat on Special:Listusers/sysop now points directly to Administrators. You can change these things without creating entire policies. Still think we need this? &mdash;♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 07:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope, I wasnt aware you could do that. Delete away, Jedi. :P &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png|Hello]] Warw/Wick 07:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd rather keep it as a failed policy than delete it. For posterity. Is anyone opposed to this? &mdash;♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 07:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Nah, not opposed. Go ahead. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 07:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)