File talk:Charr Staff.jpg

i don't think the armor is interfering with the image. there is no rule that says your player has to strip before its a valid image. its not a glamor shot and its not making it hard to see. &mdash;♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 23:07, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * /Agree. Lord of all tyria 23:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * As long as it doesn't show off or distract from the item, i think it's fine.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 23:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've been looking around for any rule that had to do with this issue. I've still reuploaded some images without armor and better lighting, because I was unhappy with the lighting myself. But for some weapon types it's a nightmare to get the picture to focus on the weapon. --RM 23:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * No armor is just neutral and I prefer that too, since naked chars all look same (of the same class). You know your own armor the best and don't have an eye for it anymore (can easily focus on the item itself), but other people with other armor notice very well the armor in a picture and look at it too. But that all still depends on the one who decides to make a shoot and to upload it. There are hardly any rules about pictures. And the few given aren't followed by many users. Have seen pictures that have a small resolution but a huge file size -.- Whatever, if someone doesn't like it he can take a new picture and upload it here. No biggie. Everything's better than no picture at all. --Birchwooda Treehug 05:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)