Talk:Game updates/20070201

Thanks blasted! GrammarNazi 18:44, 1 February 2007 (CST)



New Update
And they changed skills all over the place. Leader's Comfort is back to 3 Seconds again, now this skill is even more useless. Almost all of the changes that I saw from last time are back, and now they're permanent. So, good luck.


 * So is this a permanent nerf to the test nerf last weekend or whatever? --DragonWR12LB 18:50, 1 February 2007 (CST)


 * yup its perminent(said that on the news page in GW login screen). SF is screwed again. GL using it at all in tyria. Notice how all ele attacka are (derceaeed kd, blind, burn, etc) or (increased cost, recharge etc) or both? thanks anet so you really DO want us stuck as support softies. thanks. in contrary to everything mentionied in all 3 books BTW... and why is it a whammo can do more damage than an ele anyways? -TehBuG-


 * I don't see alot of ele skill nerfs in the changelog. Some of the water skills were nerfed but most of the fire skill edits I noticed were buffs.  And really a 1 second change in burning time for SF?  Not a big deal in PvE I don't think given the 2 second recharge.  I did note the SoA change as that'll make it more difficult for the SoA 55 builds.  Lojiin 19:04, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * Umm, did you actually read the update? All ele attacks are decreased good stuff/increased bad stuff? I'm guessing you did NOT read the update, as I noticed damage increases and/or energy cost reduction in Searing/Tenai's Heat, Firestorm, Bed of Coals, Eruption, Unsteady Ground, Churning Earth, Arc Lightning, Lightning Bolt, Shard Storm, Immolate, Flare, Lava Arrows, Flame Djinn's Haste, Stoning, Stone Daggers, and Shockwave. Smoldering Embers did get an energy and cast time increase, but it also got a reduced recharge and higher damage. Water Trident flies faster, Mind Freeze got it's slowing duration increased, Eruption, in addition to higher damage, now causes Blindness with each pulse(rather than just at the end), Lightning Hammer got reduced recharge...explain to me again how all those skills were weakened? BTW, SF is "screwed"? I played my SF ele throughout Nightfall quite a bit during the first test, and I hate to break this to you, but he still worked quite well, even with the reduced burning time. DKS01 21:31, 1 February 2007 (CST)


 * They have made the fire Ele more powerful and removed much motivation to play any other element as a dmg dealer :( -Heurist

Deadly Paradox apparently had a bug fixed, but...excuse me? It says "fixed a bug that caused this skill to affect Assassin Stances.". This is tripe!!! How are stances different than skills? As far as I'm concerned, a skill is either what Vampiric Touch is, or meaning everything that can be placed on the bar, including res sig. So which is correct? I can't see how it was a bug to use an ASSASSIN skill with deadly paradox, such as a stance. Heck, isn't there other skill requirement stuff that rips away res sig? *cough* simple thievery. Stupid ANET nerfing assassin runners. If they're going by that method, then how come Feigned Neutrality still works and that's labeled a "spell". What is this nonsense!! --82.33.8.3 19:06, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * I can only assume because Paradox is replaced by the next stance. Doesn't make that much sense to me either. [[Image:UserImage Aubray1741 ClassicIcon.gif]] Aubray1741 19:09, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * I didn't check the ranger changelog, but I wonderd if serpant's quickness got the same treatment? As that was also used before activating another stance on some runners.--82.33.8.3 19:11, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * SQ still acts like it did before. It will affect a stance that replaces it.  --Fyren 23:27, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Hmm was there some kind of hiden FoW change? i just got in and had to load ~500kb-1mb 8-|--Krushak 19:49, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Note sure if I am going to do it or not yet, but would it be a problem if I sorted the skill updates alphabetically? They are kinda a pain in the ass to compare right now with having to jump all over the place. Let me know. --RabiesTurtle 21:02, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Hating the condition placed upon Deadly Paradox, it should NOT act this way. Regardless of what ANet says, a stance is a skill, and it should be recharged. - Nex 21:09, 1 February 2007 (CST)

I understand that these skills have been permanently altered. But i have not noticed many updates. is this just me? or do they not change it for a while? Because i was looking at some paragon skills, and with 12 motivation some paragon skills were not nerfed, but actually increased? or am i reading wrong?Not So Koolaid 22:23, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * For some reason ANet lists the skills in these updates with the high range value at 15 attribute points. Also, people are updating the skills quickly.  Don't look at the skill page history, but instead the "skill details" history. --RabiesTurtle 22:28, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Big WTF, Why is Leader's Comfort changed? 3s on a self heal? That's the pits. Also on the page there is no mention of Leader's Comfort being in the update. Another problem is that the description in game for "Shields Up!" has not changed. So I assume it doesn't add 50 armor to all projectiles. Woopey, Paragons got hit with the nerf stick! Horray! Wearying Spear... Reduced weakness duration... so WHAT? Just makes it more useless, not long enough to be worth Plague Sending, and not short enough to not worry about. Oh and way to go on making the Warrior's energy pool an even bigger disadvantage. 132.203.83.38 22:29, 1 February 2007 (CST)

LoL, the change to Gale directly contradicts the newest PvP Primer on the official site. 132.203.83.38 22:37, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Interesting that they asked for input between weekends...
...since they seemed to ignore everything that was said. Good point above about SQ->other stance... I'll have to test that out. I've been line-by-line'ing through the classes I use, and nothing jumps out at me as different from the Jan 19 skillset. If anyone could point out differences they see between 1/19 and 2/1, I certainly would appreciate it. -- Oblio (talk) 19:31, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * Looks like necro changes... Depravity, Jagged Bones, Reaper's Mark, Spoil Victor (bigger nerf than Jan19). -- [[Image:Ranger-icon-small.png|25px]]Oblio (talk) 19:44, 1 February 2007 (CST)


 * Just some stuff that jumped out at me,
 * Beguiled Haze, blades of steel, Avatar Forms, Grenth's, Wearying Strike, Gale, Mantra of Recovery, Price of Pride, Power Leak, Panic, Reaper's Mark, Depravity, Sig of Return, Unblockable Throw, Power Attack--Theonemephisto 19:46, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * Ya, the more I go through the professions I don't play much, the more I see changes. I'll have to kind of retract my original comment. :/ -- [[Image:Ranger-icon-small.png|25px]]Oblio (talk) 19:47, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Part of the Temp Weekend?
Are these part of the temporary weekend (just coming early rather than late like they usually do), or are these permanent? --Theonemephisto 19:32, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * Permanent, as said on the GW page. --Nocturne [[Image:Nocturne icon1.jpg|19px]]  19:33, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Mesmers
Spiritual Pain is even worse than the last incarnation. -_- Craw   18:49, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * Spiritual Pain is an obsidian flame without the exhaust in an area and slightly less armor-ignoring damage. Shrug. I think its still fantastic. GrammarNazi 18:53, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * Yeah, but mesmers as a class kind of suffer for their collective strength in PvE. Spiritual Pain was an answer to that.  Mesmers just don't have viable AoE or mob control, their hexes are arguably weaker on average than the necro counterparts and they've got probably the weakest primary attribute overall.  I think they need help in a bad way. Craw   19:39, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Spiritual Pain actual text says "if that foe is near a spirit all other nearby foes take .... damage and this skill recharges instantly if it hits a spirit"65.7.211.83 19:59, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Unimplemented changes
I notice the update to Spirit Light hasn't been implemented (both in the skill description and in usage). Should this be mentioned in the notes section?--Mont 19:42, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * Just checked, it has been changed in both implementation and usage. --[[image:Hrothgarsignature.jpg|100px]] (talk) 21:58, 1 February 2007 (CST)

potential glitch


Potential glitch - Following the Feb 1st update some of my recently dyed armour has reverted back to it's original colour, not all but some. Anyone else noticed this? (Sorry if this is in wrong place) Telboy007

Protector Tracks
What the hell is "hard mode"? From the track descriptions, it sounds like completing all the missions at all(cause it says complete all primary and secondary objectives, not bonus objectives) gets you the Protector titles. So is "hard mode" then completing them with bonus/masters reward, or is it something new they're gonna implement? DKS01 22:55, 1 February 2007 (CST)


 * In Tyria, the bonus is the secondary objective. I am still trying to figure out what "hard mode" will be for Thunderhead Keep.  Maybe 2x the size of mobs?  Every creature has boss-like abilities (huge HP, natural resistance, etc.)?  *shudder*  Glad I got my 6 characters to at least Prot of Tyria before this "update" (should be, "game change").  Oops, just noticed another update.  I'd better go check to see what other W stances got killed.  Queen Schmuck 23:31, 1 February 2007 (CST)


 * can someone point me to the infor for this?-TehBuG-


 * There's a very brief statement from Gaile in this thread:  (fifth posting down on page 2) &mdash; [[Image:Fin_sig.gif|User:Kyrasantae]] kyrasantae   23:47, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 * "Yes, what you see is the precursor of something that we are working on for the future. We'll have more to say about this in a while."


 * I, for one, agree with several of the posts in that thread - this is a load of crap, having to play through once more/having our "maxed" titles not be "maxed."


 * So... Everyone who has the Protector Title is going to not be able to get the new title? That would not be good, as the people who invest time in to getting the protector titles would be a little upset. Bhnrecon 00:21, 2 February 2007 (CST)


 * I checked on all of my characters, and "Protector of Tyria" is, for those with it before update, still the highest level for Tyria, and still counts towards "Kind of a Big Deal" or "People Know Me". For my one character that hasn't started any missions in Tyria (Rt), I based this on her non-completion of the other 2 campaigns.  I can not verify previous "Prot of XXX" for any other campaign is still highest, though I know there are many here who can check on their characters.  I am guessing, for hard mode, that if all characters starting mission have Prot of, the "hard mode" will be automatically turned on.  There is always the (high) chance that your existing max level "Prot of XXX" will be unmaxed, which will rightly piss off 99% of title seeking people.  Queen Schmuck 00:54, 2 February 2007 (CST)

ANet is forgetting something.....
THE FREAKIN SKILL HUNTER TITLE TRACKS!!!! What the heck!? I seen where Gaile had said that they planned on fixing the skill hunter titles around mid-Jan 2007, yet they didn't, instead they made a new set of titles that CANNOT be maxed by certain players. Wonderful. If they can add new titles, why can't they FIX the old titles that have been screwed since Prophecies came out. ....*sigh*

I is are teh agrrivation. o_O --Old Man Of Ascalon   (T/C) 00:12, 2 February 2007 (CST)


 * I think you mean Factions, not Prophecies. No titles when Prophecies came out.  --Rainith 00:17, 2 February 2007 (CST)


 * Whatever, I'm tired of screwing around with this crap. The skill hunter thing is more difficult than most people give it credit for.  It's going to cost 288,000 gold at least, so that has to be earned (or bought, whatever floats your boat). Next, you have to earn 290 skill points, which is no walk in the park, afterwards you get to go find and kill 290 freckin bosses, some of which are in some of the hardest areas in the game.  And for what?  A title that cannot be maxed, period.  WTF.  I should have spent that time sitting in my guild hall getting drunk, both in game and out.  At least I could have achieved something.--Old Man Of Ascalon  [[Image:25px-Poiso.jpg]]  (T/C)


 * I fruitlessly hope that they never change how it is. I'm not interested in maxing titles at all, and I find earning the skill points to be a lot more challenging than earning the gold as I go. Besides, now all of my Heroes can have pretty much any elite that they want. Having made a lot of progress on the capping title track, I am a lot more impressed to see an Elite Skill Hunter than Kind Of A Big Deal. Decentralising pretty much the most interesting and cross-continental title seems like a big mistake to me. -- Dashface [[Image:Dashface.png]] 00:53, 2 February 2007 (CST)


 * I don't understand why people can't get it through their heads that Gaile said that there would probably be a "International Skill Hunter" title as well, which is the same thing as "Elite Skill Hunter" with a different name. What exactly are you losing?  Nothing.--Old Man Of Ascalon  [[Image:25px-Poiso.jpg]]  (T/C) 01:18, 2 February 2007 (CST)

Old Man, you just made me spill my drink! LOL! (2 post up)

Anyway, I see it as this. There are currently at least 3 unobtainable max level titles: Skill Hunter, Sunspear, and Lightbringer (might be missing one, totally ignoring retarded "Gamer" title). Well, if you work against the game you can, after many many hours of non-stop fighting (South Park episode comes to mind), get max Sunspear and Lightbringer titles. Basically, any normal Joe (as in, non-extremist) can never currently get those 3 titles maxed. With each campaign, the Skills title grew, never allowing it to be maxed.

Soooo, there really is NO point in having ONE character unlock all elites (unless you only play one character). IMHO, they should change this title to be account based (how impressive would that be in RA waiting area?), allowing all your characters to just get the elites they need (my does NOT need Searing Flames). With the left overs, you could then get the other ones with any character that just happened to be in the area to cap it. As it stands now, if you play more than one character, you are wasting time and effert to get your caps, with no benefit.

Would you (anyone reading this) be less impressed to see Elite Skill Hunter if you knew that it was account based? If so, why? I mean seriously, why would you be less impressed if they get the title with more than one character? It is still just as many elite caps. Sure, one character didn't have to get 6 million XP, but, so what? I have 7 characters (not counting perma-pre). Between them, I have (just checked) 4.897 million XP. Does this make me any less skilled? On the contrary, since all 7 characters are of a different profession, I would say I am more balanced. A 55 could rack up 6 mil xp, and yet only really know 3 or 4 builds.

Anyway, my longwindedness is ending. I think the Skill Hunter title should be changed to Account Based (they change everything else in game in "updates", so why not this?). I also think that the title should be broken into 3, Skills Tyria, Canthan, and Elona. Core skills would be required once, and count in all lands.

Then again, with last update, Anet has shown they really don't care what we think, so this is all moot. Queen Schmuck 01:28, 2 February 2007 (CST)
 * I agree to some degree. I do understand and agree that it is kind of redundant and pointless to have characters with skills they can't use, such as a Sandstorm Warrior or an Eviserate Elementalist, however, the fact that the skills unlock for all heroes for any character as well as any PvP character is definitely a good thing.  I love the fact that I can create a Factions character and get them to Nightfall at lvl 12 or 13 and get lvl 15 heroes that have these skills unlocked and allow me to make them powerful enough for me to not have to rely on guildys or PUG groups to help me with low level quests and missions.  It is also nice to be able to make any build for a PvP character on the spot without having to farm Balthazar faction to unlock them.  I personally love playing Ranger, and it's really the only character that I can do higher level stuff comfortably.  This fact makes it easier for my other characters to level up quicker and be more effective.  But none the less, the hard work I've put into doing this stuff with my ranger shouldn't go unrewarded in my opinion and at this point it is.  IMHO, a title isn't worth having if it has absolutly NO chance of EVER being maxed.  This really gets under my collar.--Old Man Of Ascalon  [[Image:25px-Poiso.jpg]]  (T/C) 01:50, 2 February 2007 (CST)
 * Just a note, Holy Lightbringer (8) is obtainable, and there have been a select few that have been able to obtain the Spearmarshal (9) title. The one problem that I could see with implementing the account-based skill title would be pissing off the players who have already spent the gold for SoCs on multiple characters going for the max title.


 * Ok, Cougar and I have been spending COUNTLESS hours / gold to try to obtain every skill there is to cap with just one character. I have 25 character slots, mostly mules, however 6 characters that i play all different professions. Does this make me more skilled then anyone, no... just means that I have the money to buy tons of slots and the time to farm just about anything that i want. However, when cougar and i spend ... oh say.... 6 hours farming 1 zone over and over and over again to get skill points to that we can continue capping skills, then this update does not fix a problem that has been around for say... forever... it is a giant kick in the b@ll$.... this is just IMHO.. but who is counting..... Bhnrecon 01:44, 2 February 2007 (CST)

Update
Seems the site has been updating and changing the skills around as they don't match what's on here any more. Capcom 01:24, 2 February 2007 (CST)
 * They still match. Did you scroll down to the older update by accident? --Fyren 01:36, 2 February 2007 (CST)
 * Oh crap, you're right. I'm sorry, I've been really sick today and am not particularly with it. :/ Capcom 01:40, 2 February 2007 (CST)

Anyone else think the note on the duration of SoD is unnecessary and just an argument of semantics? -- (talk) 01:50, 2 February 2007 (CST)