User talk:Warwick/Archive 33

For the link to my TopEnd, go to: User:Warwick/TopEnd/Talk

Archived
Fresh, clean and unfouled.. Till felix comes along. &mdash; Warw/Wick 07:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Stealing maui's archive 2, cause I can

 * Femwick, what the fuck. This is too much. You can post great gobs of code that don't matter to boost your character count, but don't go stealing other people's conversations! Do you have any idea how rude and inappropriate that is? You weren't even PART of them! [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 07:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Causing lag as well when you SUBST: such a big page, so please don't do that. --[[image:GEO-logo.png]] Jïörüjï Ðērākō.> .cнаt^  07:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Eh, I was bored. And IDK what I was smoking. ^_^ &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 14:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

ToC
Can you please keep a ToC on your page? Since you force everyone to stare at your obtrusive color scheme that you refuse to change despite multiple requests to do so, at least let them skip to the section they want. --Shadowcrest 16:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 16:56, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * And why not? --Shadowcrest  16:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Because its white on a pink talkpage, which looks baed imo. and I dont want it anyway. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 20:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Why
Are you ignoring me? -- -- talkpage 18:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Lolol, fail. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 18:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Attuned Was Songkai
I must ask you to not re-revert edits as according to GW:1RV. I feel that by now you should understand how it works. Anyway, please don't make this error again, alright? -- 20:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * See birchwoodas talkpage for my response. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 20:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw that after I wrote this, anyway, you should probably read the comments before reverting. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 20:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm doing like, 4 things at once, so its hard to pay attention to all of them. Wasn't really paying attention just then. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 20:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Goodnight, everyone
And good night to all of you too. &mdash; Warw/Wick 20:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * okay, 5 mins later, goodnight for real. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 20:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

:P
Un-Dumped-- (Talk) (Contr.) 00:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yay for you. Congrats, Marco! Now to see what the coding that I copied from pan did, since my toolbar is on the right.. =| &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 14:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Check the date... --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 14:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I know. So what? &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 14:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It's april fools. Waste of time trying to fix it. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 14:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Doubt it's in your .js, since at least I and Org Y X have it, think its for everyone. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 14:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Its on all pages.. :< &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 14:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Sidebar Issue (moved)

 * What is this sidebar issue thing? --Shadowcrest  17:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Pan did a little vandalism. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 17:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ugh, quit it Warw, you know it was a joke and it wasn't that bad. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 17:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * THATS TROLLING! Nah, I still consider it vandalism. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 17:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, you consider it vandalism. However, in your last post you stated it as a fact. Also, you could consider it a style change. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 17:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * What did it do? Move the bar from the left to the right? --Shadowcrest 17:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * On talkpages, yes. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 17:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No, Org; I stated it as my opinion on the matter. I know that it was intended as a joke, and have not called for a ban to Pan. Which I would have done, if I hadn't known that Pan was having a joke. I still dislike it and consider it vandalism. And I'm annoyed with it because it totally broke GuildWiki for my browser. And yes, shadow, thats what it did. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 17:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Pan did a little vandalism. Stated as FACT! --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 17:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No, thats my opinion of it. I never said that it was my opinion, but nor did I say that it was a fact. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 17:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * When will you learn to take responsibility for your errors? --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 17:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I have a great many answers to that, including stuff about the fact that you saying that is quite hypocritical, but I'll settle with "When will you learn to take responsibility to yours". &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 17:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I know that I fail. That's not the issue here. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 17:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Why do you bring a matter that is totally uninvolved here? I said nothing about you failing. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 17:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * "When will you learn to take responsibility to yours" Um... You're pointing fingers, and still claim that Pan did a little vandalism. isn't stated as an absolute fact? --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 17:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You change topics very rapidly, and still havn't answered my previous question. I retaliated to you saying that, and now you're saying I'm "Pointing Fingers"? I call what Pan did vandalism, and I'm sure a lot of other people do not. But he called my showing Marco and Entropy aout some vandalism I found vandalism itself. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 17:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Allow me to rephrase. With "When will you learn to take responsibility to yours" Um... You're pointing fingers I mean that you don't debunk your irresponsibility but claim that I'm the problem. While this might be true it doesn't make you more responsible. Also, and still claim that Pan did a little vandalism. isn't stated as an absolute fact? means that your sentence solely implies that it's a fact. -- 17:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I dont understand what you're saying. I think you may have misunderstood somthing. I'm saying that I consider it a little vandalism. If what you read doesnt convey that to you, Eh. Its what I intended. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 18:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Welcome to the internet, where the way you form your sentence means everything. In other words, there was only one obvious interpretation. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 18:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You dont have to be so rude in conveying it. Or didn't you intend that to sound rude? As you just said, "The way you form your sentence means everything". &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 18:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The way you form a sentence is only half of the result; it's also in how it's read. Emotions, etc, rarely convey well in text form; so how you take it can vary a lot. Warwick was meaning it as an opinion as she wrote it, and short of explicitly stating "this is only an opinion", there's not much else to do there. Trying to blame every misread/mistyped comment on each other does no good to anyone, so might I suggest either agreeing to disagree, or simply dropping the subject? --[[image:GEO-logo.png]] Jïörüjï Ðērākō.> .cнаt^  18:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not even sure why he's continuing on at me about it =| &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 18:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ever heard the term "it takes two to tango"? --[[image:GEO-logo.png]] Jïörüjï Ðērākō.> .cнаt^  18:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Uhu, but as I discussed with you yesterday, jio, when I have the oppertunity, in my nature I just have to answer back. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 18:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Which is why I interjected. --[[image:GEO-logo.png]] Jïörüjï Ðērākō.> .cнаt^  18:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)