Talk:Dervish Asuran armor

Reskinned Elonian? Icy Hot Ben 17:44, 8 September 2007 (CDT)

Yes it's re-skinned elonian, except for the female hood which is re-skinned ancient.

Naw
Trust me. I got the armor. I uploaded it.

Not completely re-skinned. It's different. I really like the armor. Elonian is completely different

Are you blind?! look at the Elonian Vambraces and then at the Asuran Vambraces, it's obviously a re-skin!
 * The gloves, yeah, but the legs, no. The danglies are totally different. Reskin or not, why are you complaining? It looks good, that's what matters. Also, female hood is reskin of Elonian, not ancient. Forgot to sign >.<--Darksyde Never Again 19:04, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


 * EWWWW ugly armor69.152.32.124 18:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

female hood is NOT reskinned ancient. ancient has upturned shoulder thingies (epaulettes?) as well as a differently strcutured hood. every part IS reskinned elonian.
 * Think of it this way: It's the 15k elonian armor we always wanted! lol.
 * 10k. And I'd like to see this armor dyed white, for those who have the armor. At least in the Dye Preview screen. Please. Pretty please?!--MagickElf666 22:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * As a note, dyed white is rather grayish. Doesn't look very good in my opinion, and very close to the silver. GarettJans 18:57, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Looking at the female undyed - at this stage, haven't people learned not to use /attention?! Also, the hood pics are a bit grainy. If these pictures are still in use by the time I get my armor, may I replace them? (unsure of the policy regarding /attention pics) The colored ones are fine, though, so I guess they ought to be left alone.
 * Sure, I'd recommend taking the pics over at isle of the nameless too if it's not a problem. Ezekiel  [Talk]  12:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * K. Could be a while, though. That character hasn't even started farming Asura points yet. :/

Male Screen shots Updated
I've uploaded a new set of screenshots of the male armor, (primarily due to the ambiguous dye color that was low contrast)... all but the hands & legs back view are looking ok, I'm guessing Wiki may just need to come back through and cleanup the scaled image to match what was uploaded because it's ok when I click on it. I'll give it a day and re-upload that one image if it doesn't take. Comments are welcome on my screenshot work -- I'd hate for someone else to be grumpy enough with it to go back through and redo things (or for that matter, for me to be grumpy enough to do the same -- I'm already feeling that way about some of my early work). Misc notes: Yamagawa 06:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I crop to the same dimensions for a set of images. I've noticed that if I crop the profile view more narrowly, the height of the scaled image can be affected.
 * I save to bmp and then convert to jpg, fudging the image compression to have the file come in under 150kb while retaining as much quality as I can in the process. Usually I get 97-98% quality for that size image.