Talk:Stone Summit

Political Faction or Sub-Species?
Should non-dwarven slaves and "golems" be considered part of the Stone Summit forces? "Stone Summit" is really a political group, not a species afterall. -PanSola 04:18, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, good idea 212.158.245.101 09:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Yes they should, Stone Summit is a game faction identified by the drops. We're not gonna go about asking "Is Dagnar really Stone Summit, or did he repent?" or "Is Orozar's Brother Stone Summit or Deldrimor?" we judge by the drops. If it drops Stone Summit Badge or Enslavement Stone, then it's stone summit. --Karlos 10:29, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Three voices in favor. Now collecting votes in objection. If there is a significant number in favor after 7 days, will make the change accordingly. -PanSola 01:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * One day left, you've been warned. By the way, a direct implication will be that the Dwarves category will become more crowded, unless there is a new subcat called "Stone Summit Dwarves" that contains the dwarves who are in Stone summit (alternately speaking, the subset of stone summit forces who are dwarves). -PanSola 23:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes

4 vs 0, done.


 * Noooo :-( But if there is a majority in favor of this suggestion I'd like to see at least some evidence (from the Game) that the Stone Summit are not just Dwarves but their Pets/Slaves (like Ice Golems) would also like to be called Stone Summit... --Si Tacuisses 10:05, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't know if the Ice Golems like or not like being called Stone Summit, they wear Stone Summit badges, or at least hold on to them long enough until they die... Heck I don't like to be called Taiwanese, but sometimes I don't have a choice in the matter. -PanSola 10:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)