Talk:Disease

Epidemic is not a disease causing skill. It will spread it but not cause it. - Marcubus


 * You are correct. On another note, why is epidemic not part of the condition transfering skills? --Karlos 11:52, 20 Sep 2005 (EST)
 * On another note, why is the list of condition removing/transferring skills duplicated at each condition? 134.130.183.83 04:28, 18 October 2005 (EST)
 * Because it is pertinent in each condition's page. We can't always assume the user will get to these pages through Condition. Sometimes the user will land here through a skill page that causes one of these conditions. Got any ideas on how to better do this? --Karlos 10:03, 18 October 2005 (EST)
 * Furthermore, there are some condition removers, specifically Antidote Signet (Blindness, Disease and Poison), Illusion of Haste (Crippled) and Tainted Flesh (Disease), that only remove specific conditions.


 * For what it's worth, does Epidemic do anything with Disease? Disease already transfers to adjacent characters!  Maybe Epidemic has no effect on Disease?  (There's the note about "same species" in the Disease description?) --JoDiamonds 17:13, 23 October 2005 (EST)
 * You could test it out with Rotting Flesh, Epidemic and Fragility. If Epidemic transfers Diseased then Fragility should trigger twice, once for losing the Diseased condition and once for getting re-infected.

transfer only to same species??? not so!
I just tested Rotting Flesh now. Cast on a renegade (human), spreads to a devourer. Went else where, cast on devourer, spread to gargoyle.

Does the "Diseased" icon description actually say it only spreads to creatures of same species, and I am seeing a bug, or did someone made that bit up and no one bothered to check? -PanSola 19:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It probably does say that, but I know it's worked as you described for months. Outside Lion's Arch, I had disease spread from a Fire Imp to Bog Skales to Tengu, so either they are all considered the same species, or the description is wrong. It's not limited to foes however, unless all pve monsters are considered part of the same meta-species. In pvp, it's possible to disease your foe, and then have them walk up to you and spread it to you. I don't believe it'll spread to pets, so perhaps it is limited to species, but in pve everything is considered one big species? LordKestrel 23:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope it can spread to pets as well but only from certain enemies (or at least that's how it worked a month or two ago). It was kind of a bit like if you put disease on a enemy creature, the pets would then get it, if you put it on a human type enemy, the players would get it. Sort of like the game divides enemies into creatures (so disease spreads to pets) and humans (so it spreads to players) and others (that can't be diseased or don't spread disease to pets or players). Somebody probably knows more on this than me but pets can get disease from the enemy. Oh and this is all in regards to PvE. --Xasxas256 23:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Renegade, which is of hte Human species according to Edge of Extinction, does not spread disease to players.

--- Disease does not spread between different species.. However i think this may be a bug because it does transfer between some different species from my tests. For instance a training dummy will infect all other training dummies but it wont infect me... However i can infect disease on a grawl or char and it will infect a devourer. Also in PVP disease does transfer between hostle and friendly players and happanes often. --Requiem 22:37, 22 February 2006 (CST)