User:Defiant Elements

Hurray, an idea that may actually work! User:Vallen Frostweaver/Project Archive/Profession Roles.

{| class="boilerplate metadata" id="stub" style="text-align: left; background: white; margin: 0 2.5%; border: 1px dotted #009; border-collapse: collapse; width: 60%;" cellpadding="0" '''This user just found out that his user page is the 33rd most linked to page out of every article on wiki and the 7th most linked to page out of all the user pages. Hurray!'''
 * valign="middle" style="padding-left: 0.5em" | [[Image:Green thumbs up.png]]
 * style="padding: 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em" |

{| class="boilerplate metadata" id="stub" style="text-align: left; background: white; margin: 0 2.5%; border: 1px dotted #009; border-collapse: collapse; width: 60%;" cellpadding="0" '''This user has been successfully vetted by the GuildWiki community according to the vetting procedure and has been nominated for adminship. '''
 * valign="middle" style="padding-left: 0.5em" | [[Image:Green thumbs up.png]]
 * style="padding: 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em" |



Defiant Elements: The following user has been nominated by  Lania Elderfire  for adminship, please show your support  Here WARNING: ''The following user may lash out unexpectly when stressed! arrghhh! i didnt do it

Priorities/Goals

 * Number One/Only Priority: Make the post NOB/PNB Build Section Viable.

Contest
So, a lot of people have recently started contests, and I thought I would start one of my own. Similar to Nog64's, I am asking people to create builds. However, unlike his, my list of elites is not generated by a subjective view of what skills are good and which aren't, they are instead elites that currently have no builds anywhere on the wiki (i.e. Stubs, Unfavored, Favored, Untested). That way, people really get to exercise some creativity since no one has ever come up with a build. See my contest page here for rules, elite skills, etc.

Builds
Realizing that GW:NOB and GW:PNB are vital and necessary, I would still like an interim system for having builds looked at and tested for anyone who is interested. Builds can be posted on my page or linked here to be commented on at the very least by myself and anyone else who is interested. Builds will not be stored, however, for anyone who is looking for some validation or is just interested to know what others think of their builds, I would like their to be a vehicle for that to happen at least until we have a new build section.

I will be attempting to run/administrate this and it will be entirely on my page. Builds should have a brief statement of purpose, a very brief usage, and any very important variants. They should be posted directly on this page right under this section.

Anyone who is interested in reviewing the builds posted here should please contact me so we can get some things figured out. I can be reached by e-mail at BTA258@gmail.com, or messages can simply be left on my talk page. Thanks.

I realize that not that many people are likely to actually see this, so if it doesn't work out, I apologize for anyone who posted a build here or wanted to review builds. However, I think it is a good idea, so, for anyone who wants to, here is your opportunity.