User talk:SBR13294

Build:N/A Teleport Toucher
I've changed the build to include Dark Aura and Augury of Death and was wondering if you could revise your vote to reflect these changes and/or provide additional suggestions. Thanks! Eleanor Ripley 19:36, 16 February 2007 (CST)

User Page
Please do not edit my user-page. Thank you. — Jyro X 18:14, 9 December 2006 (CST)

Sorry, I was tryng to cut and paste it, and went to press save preview, and hit save page. Sorry for any troubles.--SBR 18:22, 9 December 2006 (CST)

Tevin............. O.o AmericanVlad 18:53, 18 February 2007 (CST)


 * Wait no, you might be the guy I always confuse with Tevin.... I still cant tell..... T.T [[Image:Vow of Strength.jpg|20px]] AmericanVlad 18:54, 18 February 2007 (CST)
 * I am tevin Baklvon . . I just saw you had a page today. --SBR 22:57, 18 February 2007 (CST)
 * hi[[Image:Vow of Strength.jpg|20px]] AmericanVlad 13:26, 19 February 2007 (CST)
 * So do you like my build at all? [[Image:Vow of Strength.jpg|20px]] AmericanVlad 18:18, 19 February 2007 (CST)

Character Image
Please rename the image used by the character "Shadow Blade Necro" to a less generic one (for instance to Image:Shadow Blade Necro.jpg), re-upload it, and place the following tag on the old image:. The current name is to generic. &mdash; Poki#3 03:33, 29 December 2006 (CST)

I dun leech #_#  If I was standin in one place for a long time, it's cause of internet issues......btw you pm'd me ingame with "Do not disturb" o_0 P A R A S I T I C 03:36, 5 January 2007 (CST)

Bah, alright. My bad though, some guy was harassing me because I kept killing him.-SBR 03:38, 5 January 2007 (CST)

Umm... nice page...
Page design initially inspired by Gem? That sounds awfully familiar... same thing with the storyline characters and descriptions, heck, even your section titles. My page was really initially inspired by Gem's, as such I credited him accordingly. I think it's only polite to give credit where it's due... -- Ab.Er.Rant (msg Aberrant80) 14:53, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * I got this idea from my friend User:Antonio, who, in turn, got it from Gem.--SBR 15:36, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * Wow... thanks for pointing who didn't provide credit... sigh. I really don't mind if people just copy it word for word but the least they could do was put in a proper link back to the source. This is probably the old version that your friend saw to his liking. Even that part about adding D&D portfolios on the GW gods was copied word for word... -- Ab.Er.Rant (msg Aberrant80) 20:07, 21 January 2007 (CST)

reply
I use fire all the time and when I used this Water build, It worked just as good in certain aspects, better for defense and support, but the Nuking wasn't as powerful. It's hard to say "Fire does it better" because this Water build is better in certain situations during AB. I like seeing variety instead of the same old stuff so I approved it and put it back to untested for people to see. I doubt someone looking for a good water build will search in "Unfavored Builds" and this Water build is very good for someone using Water. Wizard of the Flame 01:30, 1 February 2007 (CST)

A couple things: 1) I started this on your user page, you should have replied there. 2) I just asked why you changed it, 3) You can't change it to unfavored. 4) Sign these things please. --SBR 01:04, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Sorry, about changing it, I thought someone that uses Water might enjoy using this build. I got a water green, The Shatterstone, during Green weekend so I wanted to try using Water. I used that Water build and thought it was very good. I was very impressed with it so I gave it an approval. I also didn't see any other good Water builds on here that I liked. Wizard of the Flame 01:30, 1 February 2007 (CST)

There are plenty of water builds. I think you need to become familiar with Build vetting procedure. Good night. --SBR 01:34, 1 February 2007 (CST)

N/Mo Bloodlust
Please exercise more wisdom in dealing with new contributors. If you just browse through the "diffs" of the build you'll see a new user having great difficulty editing the page. He's obviously saving every edit he makes. His build was obviously not ready for voting. You and the others exercised Wiki-bullying. Please do not drive people away with such behavior. I know if this happened to me on my first post here, I would not have been around much longer. --Karlos 06:31, 4 February 2007 (CST)

I had been watching that page for hours, checking it. When the skills went up, THAT is when i finally posted what I had to say. Ill do what ever it is you wanted me to do. --SBR 15:08, 4 February 2007 (CST)

N/Me Soul Eater
I don't think the build is great, but you moved it to unfavored when it only had a net of -2 (ratio was 1:3). I don't want to start reverting things, so I was wondering if you as the person who did it would move it back to untested where it belongs until it gets a fourth unfavored vote. Defiant Elements 19:49, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 * Sorry, went afk while adding my fourth vote. --SBR 19:49, 21 February 2007 (CST
 * Alright. Defiant Elements 19:50, 21 February 2007 (CST)

Builds
Two things, one, you seemed to like my Build:N/any Ravenous Hunger so I thought I would let you know I put an RAB up. Second, you also mentioned you liked Consume Soul so I was wondering whether you would look at my Consume Soul build: Build:Rt/any Devouring Restorer. Thanks. Defiant Elements 16:34, 22 February 2007 (CST)
 * If you're interested in voting on the consume soul build, I put it in untested. Defiant Elements 17:14, 22 February 2007 (CST)

Build:D/A Lyssa's Fury
You said that this build is countered by walking away. I added in Dash. Are you going to change your bote to favoured or atleast strike out your unfavoured vote? Eloc jcg 16:16, 23 February 2007 (CST)

Build talk:R/E Cripple and Kill
Note: While I understand your reasoning in doing so, I'm afraid that I need to point out to you that you are also in violation of GW:1RV. Generally, once someone starts a revert war, don't let yourself get pulled down with them. Notify an admin or multiple admins (as you did), and let them intervene/straighten it out - as well as posting in the talk page links to GW:1RV, and pointing out that blanking page content is viewed as vandalism. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:20, 23 February 2007 (CST)