User talk:I am 161.88

Modules in Articles
Hi and welcome to the wiki. =)

Some of our articles use "modules" for lack of a better word for information that is mirrored in multiple articles. That way if the information changes, only one thing needs to be updated. The collectors are one of the things that use the modules. Ouran Odwin uses Ouran Odwin/Collector in the article by using the following code: which will then look like the following:

("module" collapsed in order to save screen space, now that I understand it).

Let me know if you have any questions about this as it can be a bit confusing at times. --Rainith 01:39, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 * Ahhhh, the magic of advanced wiki-dom. I bow to your wisdom and thank you for sharing.  It was confusing, and now I understand. :-) --161.88.x.x 01:42, 2 March 2006 (CST)

Login bug was fixed?
At least PanSola has been able to log in again after suffering the same problem you did. You might be able to log back in now. &mdash; Stabber (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2006 (CDT)
 * Heh, looks like another bug now. I couldn't recall my password after this long, so clicked to have it emailed.  No email received - may be related to the email bug that's listed. --161.88.255.140 11:48, 18 April 2006 (CDT)
 * Emailing is broken for some reason, I've never got it working quite right. It's next on my hit list. Gravewit 12:10, 18 April 2006 (CDT)

About Gmail (moved here from User_talk:161.88.255.140)
Best to back off and let and admin take care of it, I think. No sense in polluting the history with reversions. &mdash; Stabber 05:06, 25 February 2006 (CST)

Babble
You might be interested in Uncyclopedia:Babel. &mdash; Stabber (talk) 13:33, 18 April 2006 (CDT)

About ZoS
ZoS is a sealed alpha testing guild containing mostly game devs. I doubt it's an advertisement as they do not recruit or take part in tournament matches. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 18:31, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
 * Even as alpha testing, it seems to go against the standard policies on guild mention in articles, unless there's documentation for it. I have no problem with it if its documented by Arenanet; otherwise, I think we should stick to standard policies in re: to guilds here. --161.88.255.140 18:34, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
 * Oh, I agree with your reversions. Just commenting that it is extremely unlikely that this was an advertisement, as you hinted at in your edit comment. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 18:38, 25 April 2006 (CDT)
 * Ah, I see your point. Yes, I agree, not advertising.  But I'm still feeling stuborn about flagging it as crossing guildwiki practices.  --161.88.255.140 18:50, 25 April 2006 (CDT)