GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/RoseOfKali (2)

== RoseOfKali (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count &bull; RFA page) ==

For a long time now, RoseOfKali has been one of the most active remaining editors on GuildWiki. Although Rose has occasionally gotten into altercations with other editors in the past, they arise not out of personal feelings but out of an earnest desire for the improvement of the wiki. I am confident that Rose will be able to responsibly use the sysop tools on a regular basis.
 * As an aside, image work and such might help her spend some of her time in Ukrainian captivity. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 20:24, September 7, 2009 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


 * I accept, and I finally have regular access to the internet again. RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.png]] 11:02, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

Instructions
''Please summarize the candidate's qualifications below. Add your summary as a brief bullet-point. Then go to the talkpage and explain your points in more detail.''

''To add a rebuttal to another's point, indent and add another brief bullet. Then discuss on the talkpage.''

Discussions, more elaboration on a point, lengthy counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the talkpage.

Supporting qualities

 * Constantly working on improving the wiki
 * An unheralded dedication to GuildWiki in general
 * Lots of free time
 * An ability to move beyond conflicts and not hold grudges
 * Upholds and constitues proper GuildWiki procedure.

Opposing qualities

 * Has tended to, in previous times, be somewhat of a drama magnet
 * User has had conflicts with others in the past

Neutral/Double-edged factors

 * Occasional reactionary opposition to new methods
 * Very tenacious in content debates

Community Support
''Please place your signature to indicate your support or non-support. Do not argue. Also realize that this is in no way influential towards the other merits of the candidate, just a gauge of public support.''

I support this candidacy.

 * 1) Nwash 07:28, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)   &mdash; Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 07:45, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Jimbo321 08:56, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) -- [[Image:merty_sign.gif]]-- ( talk ) 09:15, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Random Time 
 * 6) &mdash; Balistic  23:37, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) --[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]]El_Nazgir 15:02, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Cress Arvein [[Image:Cress sig.JPG]]

I oppose this candidacy.

 * 1) I have no problem with rose as a person, however I personally would not trust her with administrative tools. I've thought about it and I'm going to oppose this nomination.
 * Rose has conflicted with others in the past (including myself), and personally I would not (from what I know of her currently) trust her with administrative tools.
 * That said, I am one for always "giving someone a chance to prove themselves".
 * Whilst this is posted under oppose, I'd have to say it is an "oppose leaning to support, contradictory as the term may imply. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 15:49, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

I am neutral/undecided.

 * 1) your sig here