User talk:Charlie Stoneskin

Hey, and welcome to Gwiki, hope you enjoy yourself here.--El_Nazgir 09:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Thank you...

Perma-Pre Discussion
Ok, I enjoy solice from time-to-time, and I aslo enjoy the beautiful landscaping of Pre-Searing Ascalon, and I often find myself creating a Pre-Searing character, telling myself that the character was to be a "Perma-Pre.' However, I also later findmyself bored with the whole aspect of Pre-Searing Ascalon, or more-so with the incredibly slow leveling and ultimately find myself deleting that character. The slow leveling effect if incredibly paralyzing to the gaming experience; or maybe I am just spoiled by the much faster leveling of Factions and Nightfall. Maybe I'll rec-create another "Perma-Pre,' I do enjoy the solice and Pre-Searing Ascalon is (to the best of my knowledge) one of the most secluded places that players can access regardless of alliance affiliation. Explorable areas are extremely excluded as well, as soon as you enter one you have your own area where nobody else can bother you, and this has been part of my grounds for terminating previous perma-pre's in the past. And then there are guild halls which are slightly less exclusive with only members of your alliance and guests being able to access that guild hall, but anybody from that alliance can access the guild hall, so thus the chances of running into another player are infinitely greater than in an explorable area. But Pre-Searing Ascalon holds something different to it. Players from another expansion, and those that have crossed over to present day Post-Searing Ascalon can not access pre-Searing Ascalon. So you have here a sort of secluded glade; a place that you know exists because you can still communicate with others, but a place under everybody's radars.

On an RPG'ing level, how is it possible for one character to contact Nicholas Sandford who exists in pre-searing Ascalon, while another contacts Nicholas The Traveler who survived The Searing? The two seem to somewhat contradicts each other while creating a sort of time loop continum effect, know?

I totally welcome and encourage anybody and everybody to add any and all of there comments and dispute any and all parts of my statement... Charlie Stoneskin 08:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hehe, I know that "Let's make a perma-pre" and then "getting bored, delete" feeling. I've tried it twice now (I know, it's not that much), but each time, I got to about lvl 13, and then it just became too slow to level, and I got bored. I did get into a (then) great guild/alliance on the last one, but the allience died out :/ --[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]]El_Nazgir 10:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * So my question is; should anet try to revive Pre-Searing Ascalon, or have the left it to die for the newer projects such as Factions, NF, and GW2. If they wanted to revive it they could add more quests for my exp and/or up the amount of exp per quest. They could give perma-pre's they same abilities as toons from other expansions such as xunlai storage and GH access. Then again, would making these said changes diminish the uniqueness of Pre-Searing?

From an RPG p.o.v., if they wanted to outright revive Ascalon, returning it to its original form in modern-day cannon, they could do a whole diminnsional rift plot. I also read were there are signs of grass growing again in Post-Searing...Charlie Stoneskin


 * Well, upping the quest reward Exp a bit would be nice, and would be nice for the rest of proph too, but xunlai and stuff would get abused again, and kinda goes against the spirit of pre... Think of the guildhall glitch (if you ever heard of it).--[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]]El_Nazgir 12:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Cautery Signet
"Concise: All party members lose all conditions. You begin Burning (one second for each condition removed)."

My question is: Does "all party members" include npc's? Charlie Stoneskin 08:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope; NPCs are considered mere allies. It also won't affect pets. Martyr, on the other hand, does affect all allies within compass range, which includes NPCs. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 08:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you Felix. Charlie Stoneskin 08:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Offense v. Defense
So I was in the Random Arena trying to complete a Zaishen challenge and all my other teammates were killed leaving me alone. This is normal however as I do, in fact, have four defensive health-increasing skills currently equipped include Endure Pain, Defy Pain, Signet of Strength, and some other skill which I currently can not recall. One of my teams observing how I was doing a half-way decent job staying alive made the comment to the effect of, "You're tough, but hardly dealing any damage." I currently am wielding a sword and shield, have weilded a hammer in the past, and am thinking of returning to my hammer-wielding roots and incorporating an almost, if not, entirely offensive damage-dealing skill set. My current offensive sword skills include condition inflicting skills such as Gash. My concern is that by switching to an offensive damage-dealing hammer skillset, that I'll die a lot more often. But if I remain with the weapons and skill set I currently have, I may stay alive, but deaal little actual damage; and what my teammate said was more-or-less true. And adding any defensive skills to my hammer set would more-than-likely water-down my ability to deal damage. Up until now my in-game philoosophy had been more-or-less, "Yeah, you can deal a lot of damage, but how much damage can you deal when you are dead." And when my teammate made that comment to me, I realized the the opposite is true as well; staying alive is more-or-less irrelevant when you can deal no damage. So what do you think? Is it more important to deal damage and let healers keep you alive or what? One more point I would like to address is the fact that in pvp there is no death penalty and ressurrection is automatic, so dying is more-or-less of no real concern there. Charlie Stoneskin 08:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * This question has a different answer for each arena you are in, or PvE vs. PvP, and also your personal playing style. In PvE defense is critical for a warrior because they are going to be at the front, constantly being attacked and targeted by mobs, and they can easily soak up the damage because mobs aren't smart enough to tab over to the monks.  However damage soaking doesn't work when the opponents are smart enough to tab over to your monks, which is PvP.  However having some defense is still useful, in RA because you aren't assured a monk or ritualist, in AB because you are going to be wandering off from the group at some time or other, and in other PvP arenas sometimes just so your monks don't get a empty blue bar trying to stop you from dying while standing in AoE (ninth skill slot works too).  To answer your original question, having a balance favoring offense as a warrior is probably the a happy medium between dying and killing.  In reference to your hammer build, Lion's Comfort should be in there.  Why?  Because it's adrenaline charging, the health boost is a fun little bonus that can soak up some damage from random wanding or AoE.  Lastly:  Because you are a warrior you have 100 armor vs. physical with a hammer, and in RA, so most people won't switch to an ele weapon against you, so you don't need to bother with blocking, this also applies if your using your shield and sword.  Although if the meta is favoring assassins or warriors, consider taking some blocking, but usually don't run it if it's balanced or you don't know what's going on currently.  In conclusion:  Offense is more important then defense in PvP on warriors, but don't neglect it entirely.--Łô√ë [[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg|Roar.]]îğá†ħŕášħ  08:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Duely noted: Lion's Comfort. The other defensive skill which I forgot to mention was "I Shall Survive!!" This skill can often prove extremely useful; it counteracts conditions with degenerative pips such as bleeding and proves even more useful when conditions without degenrative pips are applied such as cripple. I am thinking having that skill and Lion's Comfort and the rest be hammer attacks and the likes. I do like the fact that Lion's Comfor creates adrenaline. My warrior has a strength of 14 and a sword/hammer attribute of 12. I am seriously contemplating downgrading the strength rune to a minor strength rune to eliminate the negative health effect (which is why I do not have a super rune or even a major sword/hammer rune applied. Once again, your advice is greatly appreciated.Charlie Stoneskin 11:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Nobody ever uses major runes in pvp, only minor ones. Health is important. You should have as much of it as you can. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 12:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Duely noted: Minor runes only. I would assume however; that you do not refer to skills as well for the multiple health-increasing skills I currently have in my skill set are what is more-or-less diminishing my capacity for damage dealing. True, I can up my health to approximately 1400 Hp, but half the time I need somebody else to help me off an opponent...Charlie Stoneskin 12:32, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No I meant runes only. I wasn't talking about skills. I am a purely offence person, although I sometimes lineback to keep my monk from getting chopped to bits. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 13:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok, that is what I thought. I just wanted to verify. Thank you for your advice.Charlie Stoneskin 13:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually, plenty people (esp Warriors and Rangers) use majors, and Defy Pain trains use sups. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]] -- (contribs) &emsp;(talk)  14:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

In Theory
Would it work for a warrior to use enough monk skills that reduce energy regen to the point where there is no energy regen... and use a zealous weapon?