User talk:Rainith

Even though you are "not as big a contributor here," your contributions are valued, and we appreciate your opinions and edits. :) &mdash;Tanaric 17:56, 18 Aug 2005 (EST)
 * Huzzah! --Fyren 18:09, 18 Aug 2005 (EST)
 * Heh, Thanks. :)  --Rainith 18:24, 18 Aug 2005 (EST)

--- Hehe .. thanks for updating the collector links in the outposts I update ;) Keep it up. kaarechr 05:09, 23 Aug 2005 (EST)
 * =) Its about all I can do while I'm here at work.  --Rainith 05:57, 23 Aug 2005 (EST)

I noticed you're adding a lot of information about pre-searing. Could you please as soon as you come to post-searing with you new character make sure to document the very first quests you'll get? The one you get right after the mission, even before reaching Ascalon city (don't remember the name) and The King's Message are by my knowledge the only quests we are still missing (apart from some quests in the Underworld). --Eightyfour-onesevenfive 20:47, 28 Aug 2005 (EST)
 * Will do. I'm trying to go thru Pre-Searing pretty thouroughly tho, so it might be a little while before I get to those.  --Rainith 20:50, 28 Aug 2005 (EST)
 * Thanks! :) --Eightyfour-onesevenfive 19:49, 5 Sep 2005 (EST)

Just wanted to say thanks for correcting my error with Karleen. Is this even the right way to message people? --Koorb 23:51, 8 Sep 2005 (EST)

Thanks
Thanks for the headsup on the Creature Species pages, I thought I was making an improvement, but obviously not. --Koorb 17:06, 9 Sep 2005 (EST) - Hey Ranith I disagree with your recent change (marked "better English") on the Upgrades/Stacking page. The "do" there refers to the "effect" (singular) and not to the "runes" (plural), so it should really be "does" not "do".


 * Yes, "do" is correct. A little more verbosely, the subject is the singular "effect of runes."  --Fyren 08:00, 13 Sep 2005 (EST)

Quests that happen nearby
Yo Rainith! Before we do and undo more articles and waste each other's time. Let's talk about this here first. you have been doing two things which I have been undoing. I am going to explain here what I am doing. I think I know what you're doing, so let us try and agree on a course of action because this is getting silly. :)
 * You have been adding a section ==Quests Given== and I have been moving it to Quests Given: . Now, my reason for doing this is to keep all creature/character pages with the same structure (i.e. the main sections are: Description, Location, Skills, Items Dropped and Notes). If a character happens to give Quests, then it has been the custom (not devised by me) to put it as a SUB section of Description. This keeps the main sections consistent through out all creatures (which theoritically facilitates coming up with a template).
 * You have been adding a section for "Quests involved in." I am categorically against such a listing. A character involved with a quest is a BIG can of worms and an unnecessary piece of information. A big can of worms because think about all the characters "involved" with all the quests. The possibilities are endless (Rurik is "involveD" with the Gift for Althea quest though he is technically not in it, Wind Born Titans are involved with Defend North Kryta and Defend Denravi though they are not mentioned). It is also unnecessary because unlike "Quests Given" (which means you should seek that guy out for the rewards), this means nothing. If the quests requires you to go to this guy, it will be listed in the Quest's page with a link to his name, which when you click on it will tell you where he is. But you'll never go to the page of Molenin to see what quests he might be involved in (but not start). I mean, that's extreme Molenining! :) If the "quest involved in" is something important, then feel free to mention it in the description (like Unruly Slaves with Molachev, which was already there). But please, do not introduce sections into the character format. At least not without consultation and deliberation and the approval of at least 75% of the US Senate. :) --Karlos 17:16, 18 Sep 2005 (EST)

RE: monsterous fang
http://guildwiki.org/guildwars/index.php?title=Monstrous_Fang&diff=0&oldid=18800 I have no proof but I did get one from there; it may have been from an Ettin --Skuld &Dagger; 23:30, 25 Sep 2005 (EST)