Talk:Rago Fever

This is complete Charr doodoo. If you went out with a party of "noobs" (not newbies) and they freaked out about seeing the all-powerful Rago Kindlerock and went crazy for his autograph, that does not warrant an entry in the Wiki, because, guess what... Noobs do that all the time. Go to the UW with a group of noobs and watch the monk ignore all sanity and reason at the sight of his first Ecto dropping. He'll simply ignore healing and run into the Coldfire Nights to lay his hands on that ecto, as if it's going to vanish in the next 10 seconds (meanwhile causing a party wipe out). And of course, such blatant sarcasm in an article is unacceptable. --Karlos 07:26, 3 November 2005 (EST)


 * While Karlos is sometimes a bit stiff uppercrust proper, I have to agree on this one. If we want to have funny articles in the wiki, I'm not completely opposed to that, but it better be damn obvious which articles are serious and which ones are "Charr doodoo".  As this article stands, I'd prefer it deleted.  Should The Community decide that funny is worth preserving, fine, but let's make it Humor/RagoFever or something like that, to separate them.


 * Lastly, let's please not get into revert wars. I'm looking at you, Skuld.  --JoDiamonds 09:00, 3 November 2005 (EST)


 * Reverting your revert Skuld and your note Jo. This is what a delete template is for, it's to entice debate in the talk page about whether or not to delete this page. Don't remove it, Skuld. If you disagree with it, go ahead and talk about it. And no need to re-invent it either, Jo. --Karlos 09:17, 3 November 2005 (EST)


 * While I do find this article amusing, I have never heard this term in game and I do not think the article is worth keeping. --Rainith 13:49, 3 November 2005 (EST)

LOL
If there could be a way for registered users to vote for articles for recommendation, I'd definitely recommend this one! (-:

funniest article ever! --Ollj 07:59, 3 November 2005 (EST)

-

This Rago Fever is indeed a valid term, I say keep it.