Talk:Warrior Norn armor

charr hide armor much?


 * Kinda, but completely diffrent... --84.24.206.123 16:00, 28 August 2007 (CDT)


 * I can see the resemblance in the male version but the female version looks more unique. Female version is rather nice I have to say. The male version doesn't look as good. SavageX 16:11, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

Omg. The helmet! Not that disgussting helmet!!...again!!!


 * Again with those lame horns... Sirocco 21:00, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
 * It would make my warrior look fat :( --Blue.rellik 21:17, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
 * News: All Warriors already are fat. =P--Darksyde Never Again 02:10, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
 * BLASPHEMY! MADNESS! --Blue.rellik
 * Sparta. They should have tried harder with the armor. Some of these obvious reskins are just freaking terrible. Especially Warrior Monument Armor. Sirocco 07:05, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Actually when you compare the male norn with the charr hide, the norn is a tad slimmer, and there are some other noticable differences. The detail is also much better on the norn.--Dice 15:42, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * I was hoping for a armour that was more similar to the 15k Glads one. I mean norns don't wear much so why do their armour cover so much? It should be illegal for a GW armour to cover a lot of the body --Blue.rellik 22:00, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

The male facing
Braveheart anyone? THEY CAN NEVER TAKE OUR FREEDOM!!! Phalmatticus 17:48, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

yeah, the braveheart face rules.

when i first looked at it i tought... BRAVEHEART!!!!11!!!, now i am heavily farming norn points, too bad for helmet, my warrior has lame hair... ~ Abbadon

Is there a face painting for female? If not then I have wasted a good amount of time getting norn points. -Ajc2123 10:59 Eastern

materials are completely diffrent than here

it need monstrous fangs, monstrous claw and iron to make them not fur