User talk:209.129.155.253

May I ask why you are voting unfavored on all our Vetted Monk builds? Not that your votes are invalid, but many of these are tried-and-true builds run by a number of top guilds; what problems do you have with all of them? - Krowman (talk • contribs)  18:33, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 * vandal, probably. Or a "OMG THESE BUILDS SUCK" (probably because he sucks), and "I KNOW UNFAVOR EVERYTHINGFAVORED THERE LOLOLOL!" scenario&mdash;[[Image:BlastThatT.jpg]]Blastedt 18:35, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 * Isnt just monk builds, he voted unfavored on Falling Shocker --SBR 18:39, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 * *repeats what he just said* &mdash;[[Image:BlastThatT.jpg]]Blastedt 18:42, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 * Note: he's not vandalizing anything by placing his own votes, though by unfavoring so many of GW's best builds, he is making himself appear somewhat inexperienced, and will force others to not take his opinions seriously. - [[Image:Candle.jpg|12px]] Krowman (talk • contribs) 18:42, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 * All but 1 vote is unfavored. Look at the time span. The only favored vote is for a Derv build, which everyone who has voted has voted unfavored. --SBR 18:44, 1 March 2007 (CST)

What he is doing is trying to make a point by spamming votes. Disrupting the wiki just to make a point IS vandalism, and can result in a ban. If the user doesn't want mass reverts, he had best explain his actions. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:44, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 * Well, if we're going to RV his contributions, we should start ASAP, because his spammed votes are quickly adding up. Give the word and I'll get on it.... - [[Image:Candle.jpg|12px]] Krowman (talk • contribs) 18:46, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 * Per the voting policies, only admins should remove votes and only in specific instances.
 * As he blanked the page with the edit summary "dont post crap on my talk page" rather than answer for his actions, I banned him for three days. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:51, 1 March 2007 (CST)