User talk:Santax13456

Image:Razah.jpg
Hi, I just want to warn you that I have place a delete tag on Image:Razah.jpg. It's a nice idea but we are agaisnt place holders. You can still defend your idea and I'm not even sure what the Sysop will deceide to do with it. They may keep it&mdash; ├ A ratak  ┤  12:11, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Ah, it's alright... it's just the closest thing we have yet to an "official" image. Heh, guess I should have cited my source when I uploaded it - I got it from the Japanese GW Site. --Santax 12:14, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Anahael
Can I ask why you've made a user page for another user (with my nav boxes too I might add ~_~ )? --Xasxas256 07:37, 26 December 2006 (CST)
 * I've been using Anahael as a name as a name for my chars since the FPE, it was a Rit that I remade as a Para. Another user by that name is pure coincidence. --Lugiatm 18:14, 26 December 2006 (CST)
 * Oh sorry, I appear to have accidentally made a seperate userpage for one of my subpages. --Lugiatm 18:14, 26 December 2006 (CST)
 * Oh bugger it, I've used the old account I made ages ago to make both replies >_< --Lugiatm 18:15, 26 December 2006 (CST)

User:Santax/MonoBook.css
Monobook.css :) &mdash; Skuld 16:51, 27 December 2006 (CST)
 * User:Santax/monobook.css actually, not User:Santax/Monobook.css. Note it tells you when you're editing a .css article in userspace when there's no corresponding skin name.  --Fyren 16:52, 27 December 2006 (CST)
 * Oops, yeh &mdash; Skuld 16:53, 27 December 2006 (CST)
 * Yeah, but it also said that common.css didn't exist either... pretty bloody confusing actually lol. Thanks for your help ^_^ -- 16:54, 27 December 2006 (CST)
 * Creating your own common.css won't do anything. That's not a case issue.  --Fyren 19:07, 27 December 2006 (CST)

Legacy
Hey Santax, I'm not sure if I've missed something, but what were your reasons for adding the legacy tag to refund point? This is/was a bit of a sensitive issue :P  &lt;LordBiro&gt;/&lt;Talk&gt; 12:44, 18 January 2007 (CST)
 * Ah, sorry about that... I just assumed that anything that is now removed from the game is subject to this template. I need to read talk pages more :P -- 10:55, 19 January 2007 (CST)


 * You didn't do anything wrong, it was just that I'd noticed it and wondered what had prompted it :)  &lt;LordBiro&gt;/&lt;Talk&gt; 12:52, 19 January 2007 (CST)

Prince Rurik
What was your reasoning behind changing Undead Prince Rurik into a redirect to Prince Rurik? --Rainith 07:50, 12 February 2007 (CST)
 * There's no point in having 2 pages on one character, which aside from a different skin used and a different name, he is. Information on his death and resurrection is now included in the Prince Rurik article now, so none of it goes to waste. -- 07:51, 12 February 2007 (CST)
 * One is an NPC, one is an enemy. The game itself differentiates them by their name.  All of the information wasn't in the Prince Rurik article.  If you plan on doing anything like that again, use the  tag and let people discuss it on the talk page before doing it.  Thanks. --Rainith 07:55, 12 February 2007 (CST)

Your signature
Your signature breaks the signature policy. For starters, sup tags are forbidden. Secondly, you are not allowed to use inclusion like you use. Instead of   you should use   . Thanks. -- (talk) 07:11, 6 March 2007 (CST)