Category talk:Skeleton Army

Should we move this category into a Sub of Undead or keep it out here? I say it should go into undead. --Karlos 08:53, 4 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * I'm not sure whether we should keep this category altogether (Are those skellies worth their own category just because they are found in the FoW?). But if we do, I ageed it should go into Undead. --Eightyfour-onesevenfive 10:02, 4 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * I'll throw in my 2 cents and agree with Mr. Numbers. :)  --Rainith 11:34, 4 Oct 2005 (EST)

The name of the species is simply "Skeleton". For example there is a weapon upgrade "of Skeletonslaying". Hence I think the category should be called Skeleton as well (not Skeleton Army). No need to separate the skeletons in the Underworld from the ones in the Catacombs or the ones in Kryta. --Tetris L 19:18, 28 October 2005 (EST)


 * Tetris, this is a different discussion. This is like Shining Blade and White Mantle. This is a faction in the game, not a species. --Karlos 20:57, 28 October 2005 (EST)
 * Faction Categories ftw? --FireFox 21:22, 28 October 2005 (EST)


 * We never settled that discussion. For humans it was convenient to place the factions as sub-species as it made category:humans less crowded, but overall, it really is apples and oranges with species. For example, the Shadow Army has the Abyssals which looks like a troll, then the Shadow Ranger/Monk/Warrior/Mesmer/Ele which look like humans and then the Shadow Beast which is a nightmare. Faction wise, they are the Shadow Army, but species wise they seem to be different species. Of course, in the game, they all drop Shards, Piles of Dust and Dark Remains, so we can say they are the same species, though they really don't look it. :) The Skeleton Army is just a faction within Undead that has it's own ranks and units. It's not a different species. --Karlos 22:02, 28 October 2005 (EST)
 * I don't have a problem with Skeleton Army being a sub-category of Skeleton, which should be a sub-category of Undead. --Tetris L 00:31, 29 October 2005 (EST)