User talk:141.151.186.184

Please do not tag users with this sockpuppet tag unless you provide proof that an admin agrees with. Regardless of how damning you believe this proof is. I have reverted the ones for which we have no proof. --Karlos 15:28, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * All right, I will provide the proof. Stay tuned. F G 15:30, 18 June 2006 (CDT)

Left you a note in the section threatening Stabber. These kinds of threats are unacceptable. Continue it here or there if you want to talk. --Karlos 15:38, 18 June 2006 (CDT)

Where have I broken RV1?
I'm curious. 141.151.186.184 17:45, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Here for example. While we are at talking about rules, please read the text in the delete template before you remove it the next time :
 * "If you disagree with this page's deletion, please explain why on its talk page. If this page obviously should not be deleted, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from articles that you have created yourself." --Xeeron 18:19, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Yes, do not tamper with the delete tag. This has nothing to do with your investigation. We, as a community, have not actually decided whether or not we are going to adopt or keep that template. At this stage, slapping a delete tag on it is fair game. You cannot RV delete requests just because you disagree with them. --Karlos 18:38, 18 June 2006 (CDT)


 * I find quite amusing that you took the time to argue the 1RV claim (which, as Xeeron's link proves, you did exacly 5 mins before asking where you did it, quite the selective memory you got there) yet let all the rest pass. Anyway... --Theeth (talk)   18:27, 18 June 2006 (CDT)