User talk:Rickyvantof

Sup.

heh thanks for the support! I love IW :D --Apathy 02:09, 31 January 2007 (CST)
 * IW FTW!! -- S i  g  m  A  [[image:Aura_of_Faith.jpg|19px|||My Talk]] 13:36, 5 February 2007 (CST)
 * :D

U'r userpage sucks =P. btw u from The Netherlands? -- S i  g  m  A   09:52, 7 February 2007 (CST)

omg how many build you made? -- SigmA 09:21, 25 February 2007 (CST)
 * way too many, lawl

GO Wings GO Sigma GO Rickyvantof -- "Wings" 07:44, 28 February 2007 (CST)
 * wewt...lol--Rickyvantof 07:45, 28 February 2007 (CST)

Will you sign me user_talk page? "Wings"
 * TY -- [[Image:Wingsthatheal-icon.jpg]] "Wings" 07:55, 28 February 2007 (CST)

YW

Yeah on that power attack leader build you commented, it's more useful to use berserker stance when you are in a mob but you can use power attack and Wild Blow while it recharges. Hockeyclark66 23:58, 2 March 2007 (CST) Hockeyclark66
 * Oh Okay

Idiots not testing
You know everyone is slagging off your beserkers knock down blatently without testing it. Thats happening to my builds! my dervish thumper is way better than any thumpers ont his site. And IW warrior owns the me/w IW. I hate all these voters that clearly have no brains. J upsto
 * I know. for some reason those people don't want new builds in the favored section, or something. If you look at some builds in favored section there are some way outdated: Builds that get deleted on first sight, nowadays. I don't know what's with those people....I guess they're very depressed and had a bad youth? I don't know...--Rickyvantof 08:27, 3 March 2007 (CST)
 * I agree we should make a little club or comitee against these retards. Its so annoying when your giving them such a good idea and they just can't accept it. I dont think many of the tested builds deserve to be there.-jupsto
 * A Club?? XD Actually I don't really care if my builds get favored, cause I KNOW they work. I don't need some so-called experts telling me wether it works or not. But, yea, it's that darn rule, saying you don't have to test a build to vote for it. Some people are obviously abusing that. But really I don't think we can do anything about it, all we can do is just accept it.--Rickyvantof 09:50, 3 March 2007 (CST)
 * We hebben een clubje opgericht voor mensen met een lelijk gezicht, je hoort erbij, je hoort erbij!!:P:P:P:P:P -- Sig mA 09:53, 3 March 2007 (CST)
 * LOL XD
 * I Don't speak russian! anyway your right really, my gaming computer broke so I really dont have anything to do. maybe it could be a mafia -jupsto

Speak russian? It is Dutch.. and sign your guild by typing four tiles ~ -- Sig mA 10:09, 3 March 2007 (CST)

You don't say. xD why we typing in green? is this part of our revolution? jupsto

I've got no idea, propably my signature is wrong.. uh oh Gem is already going to get me cus my sig is bad!! -- Sig mA 10:24, 3 March 2007 (CST)

WTF My talk page is green! Dx

Date of birth :P -- Sig mA   14:11, 5 March 2007 (CST)
 * I'm old :D Rickyvantof 14:12, 5 March 2007 (CST)

Berserkers KD
You know i said backbreaker would be better? I'm not sure since i realised (got told) that standard knock down time is 2 sec not 1 (which i assumed previously). so devastating hammer does 3 sec KD vs backbreakers 4 sec KD but devastating hammer is more spamable. I think you should test which keeps foe on ground % of the time. If you change elite you prolly get it re-tested/vetted.




 * I used Devastating Hammer at the beginning. Then after I put it on Wiki I realised the DPS was way too low. I put Dev Hammer in Variants, so...--Rickyvantof 11:07, 6 March 2007 (CST)

Dps isn;t effected much by +20 damage on a 10 spike skill. You decision but thinking about it Dev maybe better, counter blow EVEN BETTER against non-monk attacks. -jupsto

Sacred Rage
Is there a build like this in un-favoured or something? Sounds like a fun build to me. I wish i could test it. IWAY works pretty good in AB i find. What weapon would you use? sundering/zealous Axe I was thinking cuz fast and high criticals. And what atribs? and i can see energy becoming a major problem xD so meebe cut strenght of honour.


 * forgeting energy + strenth of honour
 * 1) smiting 6
 * 2) strenth 10+2
 * 3) Axe mastery 11+1+2
 * 28+5 damage +52%-72% armour penetration is how much?!
 * Plus (46+21.4)=67.4% chance of critical which doubles damage (maybe just axe damage)
 * +33% IAS which doubles damage again really. (IWAY is quite conditional)

Well it gets complicated and I really don't get this page damage calculation. but i'm sure it is high damage but it will cost over 15 energy every 15 seconds.
 * hehe cool, you like my build...And No i don't get them either...those math pages are just too weird O-o--Rickyvantof 12:46, 7 March 2007 (CST)

"The Wassassior"
Should be named "The Wassassinator". --Sig mA .   12:47, 7 March 2007 (CST)
 * It should :D *changes*--Rickyvantof 12:49, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Nederlander!

 * :D InfestedHydralisk  [[image:Shadow_Prison.jpg|19px]] 16:31, 14 March 2007 (CDT)

Uh...ok>>; dussssss........ Tomo 14:17, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
 * :D--Rickyvantof 09:01, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

Moving builds into your userspace
Please don't do that. It's highly inappropriate. If you want the builds in your userspace, copy them in new articles there, don't move the entire builds. Some of those are even favoured ones. --Dirigible 09:16, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * I moved Build:W/any Lonely Basher back in Builds, left the others in your namespace since they're just stubs. Copy/paste is probably the best idea from now on. --Dirigible 09:21, 24 March 2007 (CDT)

Copy paste to where??? I'm rather confused by this whole thing....--Rickyvantof 09:24, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Create a new article in your namespace, (e.g. User:Rickyvantof/W/Any Lonely Basher), click on that red link and paste the build content in there, so you'll have a new copy. --Dirigible 09:29, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Oh okay I get it...it's all because of the build wipe thing...--Rickyvantof 09:31, 24 March 2007 (CDT)

#:
Your edits had the vote count screwed up, from the lack of proper wikicode. When responding to votes in the voting section (which shouldn't be done period, mind you; respond below), always use #: instead of merely :. Thanks for your time. -Auron  04:14, 27 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Oh, sorry. I didn't notice...--Rickyvantof 04:15, 27 March 2007 (CDT)