GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Warwick (3)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Warwick (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count)
This is my Request for Adminship. I believe that I am a fair candidate for Adminship. I'm on the wiki most of the time, and I patrol frequently. I've been fighting vandals on the wiki for the past 5-6 months. Some of you may say that I have not been here for long enough; To be honest, the time that you've been here doesn't matter if you have experience- Which I do.

Some of you will oppose because you sheerly do not like me. To be perfectly honest, that is no reason to oppose it. You should vote as to how you think that they would do as an administrator. If you think that I would be likely to abuse my power, then oppose me; but if I become an Administrator I would not.

Others of you will say no because of the drama on Shadowcrest's Mafia game. That had nothing at ALL to do with me; It was my brother. He has decided that he no longer wishes to contribute to this wiki, and so will probably leave us alone. In any case, he is on a trip at the moment.

Some of you will say that if I share an account with my brother, he may come back and vandalise very badly, and since Entropy is quite inactive at the moment (At least I think...?), He would keep unbanning himself and banning everyone and deleting loads of articles; I have changed my password now. My internet server purges the cache whenever I log off, which I do when I'm off the computer. Besides, he said that he is done with this 'wiki, and anyway he would, to be honest, be far too cowardly to vandalise an article.

Several of you will say that we have enough administrators at the moment; You can say that, but you can never have enough admins. I think we only have two european administrators- Viper and RT. RT contributes to Wikipedia a lot, and a fair bit more then Gwiki, which puts him off some of the time. Viper, admittedly a great contributor, plays a lot of other games. I've seen a lot of activity from him since he was promoted, (Deleting spree much? =P), but he does play the other games, once again limiting his time on the wiki. I dont play any other games, and am on the wiki most of the time to patrol vs vandalism.

Others of you will say that there are more viable candidates at the moment; The only one I can see at the moment is Shadowcrest. Gimme's time on the wiki has been much reduced recently, since he plays another game or somthing like that (?), and Shadow's campaign hasn't exactly been successful so far =P.

And as a closure, Welcome to my RfA! (God, that speech made me sound like some sort of polition) -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 15:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Candidate, indicate acceptance of nomination here

As I've written this pretty long speech for it, I accept! -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 15:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * EDIT: By the way, I'd like to know where this apparent vandalism or wariness of vandalism is coming from. I've searched my contribs, and I cant find a single vandal contrib nor can I find a single threat of one. As far as I can see, every contrib I've added has been positive, except for a few breaches of GW:AGF. I admit, however, to the Polar Bear being me. I admit, I was sceptical to it. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 16:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * EDIT2: There have been some people saying that I'm not a good candidate because I'm immature somtimes; But then again, so is MP. Hes an admin, isnt he? I'm unpredicable, but not much. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 19:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * EDIT3: For the final time, I'd like to ask you all NOT to vote on weather or not you like me, since this RfA has actually been a popularity contest. (Apart from Proggers vote; I know that he likes me and he still neutraled). People have been judging on how much they like me, and if/not they think I'd make a good admin (Me and zulu had a conversation about me, and he agrees that its more of a popularity contest). I'd empty the votes and ask everyone to revote, keeping this notice in mind, but I dont think anyone will. I think that truly because of the fact that most of you don't like me, I won't get many supports. But still, if you read this, please, revise your vote and check what you actually think, not weather or not you like me. People will say this is vote begging, and I don't care what they think. Supports, opposes and neutrals alike, please revise your votes and decide if you actually voted on my popularity with you, or on my administrator abilities. I know that several of you voted oppose on base of the Mafia, and several of you have hidden your true motives behind it behind a pretence of it being my brother (RT- You voted support in the previous RfA by my brother, and you knew that it was my brother). I havn't vandalised, and I havn't wreaked havoc. All that has truly happened is talk page spamming, one breach of GW:AGF, and a ruining of a mafia game. Two of those things weren't done by me, one of them was. I've been here since the start of this account, and I've been the one to take down the RfAs my brother has put up. And that closes this edit. &mdash;♥May♥ Wick♥ 15:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA ended 03/16/08, candidate unsuccessful

Support

 * 1) I have thought long and hard about this, and have decided to support Warwick in her quest for adminship, futile though it may be at this time. Indeed, because of recent events, some of us were less inclined to believe anything Warwick may have said. However, I don't care. Warwick is Warwick, and Warwick is my friend, and even if there is no obnoxious brother, that won't change. So I place my signature image here with pride! [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 16:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow.. Just, wow.. Thanks Felix. I think that there may have been some people who would have put their signature here, but they dont want to because they're sort of "Scared".. Maybe thats not the right word- Unwanting to put it there so they don't seem odd compared to everyone else. It takes courage to say what you think when everyone else is against it. Oh, wait *looks down* nope, definately no-one who would have voted support otherwise. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 16:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Support. Even if some users may or may no have personal disagreements with Warwick, either recent or long-standing, it doesn't discredit that Warwick is - and has been - a helpful editor. Both of them. --[[image:GEO-logo.png]] Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>  .cнаt^  19:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * =] --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) You know what? Nevermind. I can't find a single reason to vote against you. Except Mafia, but that was a game and I'll GW:AGF that it actually wasn't you.[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]]Entrea Sumatae  [Talk]  22:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * =]. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:29, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Changing to support. Cress Arvein(Talk) 21:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The plebs are begginning to sway towards me in my favor! "Hey, did she just call us plebs!?!" "Uhh.." *You guys start throwing fruit at me*. Heh =P. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 21:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) I've changed my opinion. I think Warwick will make a good admin. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 22:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I have that affect on people *Crowd notices a sniper pointed at org* "Uhh.. *whisper*get out of sight you idiot!*" =P. Yes, I do feel every vote deserves a talk to =P --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * And here I was, thinking you're actually a good thunker. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 19:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thunker? Whats that? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 19:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It's a freaking reference. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 19:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, Thunker = Thinker? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 19:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, now you need to find out where it came from. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 19:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Did I say it some time? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 19:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) I'll elaborate on my reasons for supporting later, for now just know that I do. Zulu Inuoe 18:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Although I don't offer full support and I see her flaws very plainly, I figure we have others with the same flaws as admins already (A very easy name comes to mind). Can't be too choosy at this point, I suppose. Zulu Inuoe 19:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ask no questions and we'll be told no lies, Zulu? Rather cloak and dagger, dont you think? =p. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 19:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Are you withdrawing support or just adding a statement? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 19:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm just adding a statement, sorry about not clearing that up. Zulu Inuoe 14:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Warwick is, undeniably, a good contributor. Sure, her brother ruined a Mafia game; oh noes, Warwick will make a horrible admin! Muy horriblé! But, friend or not, I think he'll make a good admin. --<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest
 * Hehe. ^_^. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 20:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Because you share an account with your brother we have no way of knowing which contributions in the past were his or yours. As such we can't truly know what kind of contributions you alone have made. Plus, it only takes one time leaving yourself accidentally logged in for a trouble-making sibling to come in and make a mess. Also, I'm not sure we need more admins currently. Entropy just promoted several. Your contributions are appreciated as always but having good intension and reverting vandalism isn't the only thing to consider. &mdash;<font color=#ff44aa>♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥  18:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Jedi, (Yeah, only just noticed you =|) My browser cache clears itself after every login, and as entropy said: You can never have too many admins (Quoting entropy ftw =P) &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 19:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) I'm afraid I too will have to vote oppose because you share your account, I do not feel safe giving the admin tools to someone who isn't trusted by the community <B>R</B><B>T</B> 18:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * To the both of you: My cache clears every time I log out of AOL, and as such I have to re login.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * +1,I doubt that He'd actually vandalise anything. He's too cowardly =P. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The thing is, you seem to change who you are so many times, I literally do not know who you are, who is editing from this account. <B>R</B><B>T</B> 19:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I won't be doing that anymore, and you'll see that. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Then, if I see this, on a later RFA I may vote support <B>R</B><B>T</B> 19:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * changed to strong oppose because of vote nagging <B>R</B><B>T</B> 20:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Wrong place, much? In yikeys =P. Btw, whats the difference between a strong oppose and an oppose? It all matters exactly the same. I havn't nagged you or anyone, and the only reason I was doing that was because I was irritated. I tend to irritate people when irritated. Luckily, thats not often. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 20:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Too immature for such a responsible and grownup task. <font color="Purple">Yikey <font color="Green">∞  18:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I dont think you read any of the above, and just skipped to voting oppose.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I did. <font color="Purple">Yikey <font color="Green">∞  18:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Warwick is actually chronologically older than about half the curent sysops. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 18:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * mmhmm? If you actually had you'd have read that about 99% of the immatureness was that of my brother. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) As long as you share an account you cannot be trusted. Also, I'm still not certain if you actually have a brother or you are just excusing yourself. In either case, as long as you share an account you are responsible for his or your edits. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 18:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I DONT share an account with him anymore. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Prove it? <font color="Purple">Yikey <font color="Green">∞  18:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * And im to do that... how? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If you aren't sharing anymore, that means that you can get a fresh chance. However, due to your former life, I can't say you're up for the task. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 18:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * So I get a fresh chance, but you dont trust me? Yeah, that makes sense.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You went from untrustworthy to neutral, an improvement if you ask me. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 18:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The way you implied it was that you were giving me a fresh chance but not actually doing so >.< --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I misphrased. I meant that you have too little positive edits. Sorry for the misunderstanding. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 18:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I do? Gimme a sec, I want to check through my contribs. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 18:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Combine it with more time on the wiki. It's nice what you're doing but don't expect your suddenly capable of becoming an admin. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Organism X (contribs) 12:46, 4 March 2008.
 * 1) I don't trust you with admin powers. As Entrea said - nothing to do with mafia game, but I honestly can't tell when you are telling the truth and when not. I don't know when it's you or your brother. I don't think you would be a good admin overall, but don't take it personally. --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] -- talkpage 12:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * So much for that neutral vote then? =P. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 20:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) For what it matters, you come across as a immature, unpredictable and confusing individual. While that type of person is often fun, it is not the right type of person that would handle administrative powers well. --[[Image:AlariSig.jpg]] 21:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * once again, no offense but who are you? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Warwick, you sound like someone who can't accept other peoples opinions, please don't imply that a less known user is unimportant. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 16:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No no, Org- I was actually wondering who he/she was =P. I'd never seen them. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You say that far too often, what does it matter anyway. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 16:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * See her/his talk page. =P. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 20:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Seems desperate for this position. Things like This from previous RFAs don't encourage much, although you have changed. Similarly, you started spamming random talk pages to 'up the wiki activity' or something, and you flatly deny you're going for an RFA. Then you do. That makes this your.. 5th one? And having an untrustworthy admin doesn't seem too good either. I've put this in neutral rather than anywhere else, for the moment. [[Image:Jamster Sig.jpg|19px]] ---Jamster--- 21:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * That = Brother. This is my first RfA. I was actually mainly doing it to spite him. If he was here, he'd be lhao.. =/ --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, my sister posted the above. No, wait. I don't have a sister :o So most of your contributions therefore haven't been yours? O_o. [[Image:Jamster Sig.jpg|19px]] ---Jamster--- 21:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Every contrib I have added has been positive. Yay much? I'd move to Oppose, but don't wanna screw up again xP --[[Image:Jamster Sig.jpg|19px]] ---Jamster--- 21:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Moved to oppose. See most of the above reasons. [[Image:Jamster Sig.jpg|19px]] ---Jamster--- 19:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No contrib I've made has been negative, though. And those had nothing to do with me. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 20:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Your account made them. It's impossible for us to know whether it was you, your brother, your mother or your dog. Your account is your account, and any contribs under that account are yours. -- Brains12 \ Talk 20:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * As RT said, yes. But why does that deserve an oppose? Its talk paging, and its in no way negative. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 20:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Because if there are negative contributions (which you agree to, seeing as you acclaim most of them to your brother), it is negatively attributed to your account, thus would add to an oppose vote. -- Brains12 \ Talk 20:15, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, but there aren't any.. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 20:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ugh, polar bear much? You shouldn't deny that one and make yourself look perfect. Also, this isn't about the facts, this is about opinions. If Jamster thinks your unworthy it's his right to think that. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 20:23, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * (ec) "If you actually had you'd have read that about 99% of the immatureness was that of my brother." "I tend to irritate people when irritated" - sounds negative to me. But I'll stop now. -- Brains12 \ Talk 20:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Org: Polar bear was me. I'm not, but trying to get a response since I dont see why hes saying that. Brains: Thats true, but I was REALLY irritated. I dont actually irritate people much truthfully. Only when I'm really irritated. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 20:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * And how well will that go down with admin tools? Lord of all tyria 20:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You stated: "Yes, but there aren't any.." (negative posts). Yet, you've also stated that that's untrue. Therefore, a contradiction. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 20:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Would it do anything? I irritate people. Not vandalise/ban/delete/somthing. and its scarce that I am irritated. Org: I never said that thats untrue. I have made no negative edits, and I havn't contradicted myself. I have in no way said that its untrue. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 20:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Quote: "As far as I can see, every contrib I've added has been positive, except for a few breaches of GW:AGF." Yet, again admitting you've made less than positive edits. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 20:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I've only breached AGF once, during the Polar Bear thing. And that was because of the fact that the guy had actually PM'd RT saying that he was faking it.. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 20:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * In other words, you have negative edits. Stop saying that you don't. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 20:47, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * By negative edits, I mean vandalism and/or breaking NPA. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 20:49, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * (Reset indent) We're not talking about what YOU think. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 20:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No, we're not. I never said we were. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 20:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You claim Jamster's reasoning worthless simply because you don't think breaching AGF to be a negative edit. That IS talking about your own opinions. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 21:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Warwick, the fact of the matter is that you do in fact have negative edits. That's all there is to it. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 21:02, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Once again you're getting off my point, like on #6. Im not claiming his reasoning is worthless. I'm claiming I cant see it, and that hes claiming the the negative edits are the talk page spammage, which, even if were done by me, are not negative, they're just spam. Which may be annoying at times, but its not negative and doesnt hurt anyone. And this shouldn't be on the rfa. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 21:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Au contraire, it belongs here most of all. In fact, you set the precedent for lengthy discussions on the rfa page by responding to every single vote, whether support, oppose, or neutral, multiple times. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 21:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thats true, I suppose. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 21:08, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Reviewed my vote. [[Image:Jamster Sig.jpg|19px]] ---Jamster--- 17:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) You've got us both banned, acted immaturely multiple times, begged for supports, nearly stole my crystalline sword Colossal Scimitar in-game, and argue against EVERY single oppose vote. I have no proof that you even HAVE a brother, much less share an account. Weighing the risks with the positives, I just don't feel that you really need admin tools right now. Since you will probably argue anything that I'm posting against you, I'm just going to say right now that I will not respond to anything you post here. Avoiding wiki-drama ftw--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 21:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Easily fixed. I didn't get you banned, my brother did, but you're not reading this, and even if you were you wouldn't respond. I havn't begged for supports, I've debated with people about them, you dont have a crystaline sword, and anyway that wasnt me, and it was given back. At least, I dont have it. IIRC, it was a collossal scimatar, but I'm not sure about that. And anyway, that has nothing to do with the wiki. No, you dont know, and I cant prove it, so just make your mind up about weather or not you believe me. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ 21:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Make a new account. Contribute for a few months. If you've garnered enough trust by then, I will support you. Until then, I cannot place my faith in someone who won't take simple measures to ensure security in editing. --Eliot Spitzer 14:30, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I personally distrust somone who makes an account then immediately goes to somthing which isnt directly linked to at all and votes support without knowing nay backstory whatsoever. But thats just my opinion. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ <font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">Wick♥ 14:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Maturity is over-rated? Not when you've got the ability to devastate a wiki it isn't. Candidate doesn't appear to think through her actions, until there is a negative response, and not thinking, along with claiming to "be irritating when irritated" doesn't sound like a good thing for a sysop. Lord of all tyria 18:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I dont have the ability to desastate the wiki. Regardless of what I did, it could all be recovered and unbanned. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ <font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">Wick♥ 18:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't like the idea of someone who says they lack maturity, reacts like this to oppose votes, "whorus" people with few contribs, and continually changes what they say in an argument having admin tools. Lord of all tyria 18:56, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Everyone is purposely misinturptuting everything I say. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ <font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">Wick♥ 18:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * "Admin tools is sheerly "Crime Fighting Skeelz", and so has nothing to do with my maturity or any contributions". How the hell can anyone interpret that the way you have said? It demonstrates misunderstanding of the admin role on this wiki, and that you would actually think that scares me. Someone's contributions are going to have meaning when RfAing, or wouldn't everyone have admin tools straight off? Lord of all tyria 19:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * An admins role on the wiki is to ban vandals and delete spam. apart from that, according to GW:YAV They are the same as anyone else. &mdash;<font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">♥May♥ <font face="vivaldi" color="purple" size="4">Wick♥ 19:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Neutral for now. I have opinions leading both towards support and oppose, but I'll hold off for now. Cress Arvein(Talk) 20:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Seems desperate for this position. Things like This from previous RFAs don't encourage much, although you have changed. Similarly, you started spamming random talk pages to 'up the wiki activity' or something, and you flatly deny you're going for an RFA. Then you do. That makes this your.. 5th one? And having an untrustworthy admin doesn't seem too good either. I've put this in neutral rather than anywhere else, for the moment. [[Image:Jamster Sig.jpg|19px]] ---Jamster--- 21:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * That = Brother. This is my first RfA. I was actually mainly doing it to spite him. If he was here, he'd be lhao.. =/ --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) First, let me say this has nothing to do with the Mafia game. It's a friggin game, that doesn't matter. It's mostly that looking at Editcount, you have very few (<700) mainspace contributions. There's just not a whole lot of  reason to support. Granted, I can't oppose, but for now, I can't really support.[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]]<font color="#4682b4">Entrea Sumatae   <font color="#4682b4">[Talk]  23:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * That's got a lot to do with time. By the time Warwick joined, many articles were already written and finished. The fact of the matter is, only the very old and mostly now inactive members have loads of mainspace contributions, because they wrote the articles. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 23:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * That may be true. I only have as many as I do because of random wiki-ogre-ry. But all the same, if even that amount isn't all his contribs... I just can't support.[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]]<font color="#4682b4">Entrea Sumatae  <font color="#4682b4">[Talk]  23:47, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ass his contribs? [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 23:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * WTF? That was intended to be "l"s[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]]<font color="#4682b4">Entrea Sumatae  <font color="#4682b4">[Talk]  23:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * GG entrea --<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest  23:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, shut up.[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]]<font color="#4682b4">Entrea Sumatae  <font color="#4682b4">[Talk]  23:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) See talk page. --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] -- talkpage 22:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Because I keep getting harassed in game to vote in this RFA :o nosupportforyou Seriously though, with everything that happened, I don't feel I can make a good and accurate judgment call at this point without personal feelings getting in the way. -- [[Image:Isk8.png]] <font face="comic sans ms" color="teal">Sk8 (T)  (C)  20:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Damn.. Now I've gotta think of somthing else to harrass you about... Hmm... --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 20:40, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No more harassment for you! -- [[Image:Isk8.png]] <font face="comic sans ms" color="teal">Sk8 (T)  (C)  20:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If you didnt get it earlier, Isk, I'm sorry; I was just feeling extremely pissed off because my router was being damn unpredictable and kicking me every 5 mins~. Its no excuse, but sorry. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 21:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) I haven't been here long, and haven't gotten to know people on here yet. Just looking at the edit count though I can't really support or oppose.--<font color="Orange">Paradoxical <font color="Brown">Ambiance  20:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I offend you, but who are you again? =P. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 21:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * He's a new user. --<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="Steelblue">Shadowcrest  21:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah. Sorry for the bottish welcome; Whenever RT welcomes somone the urge to take the mick out of him by adding that template becomes too strong. =P. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 21:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) I don't have a clue which contribs were made by which person. I'd like to make a reference to stabber, but I'm not sure how well it fits here. Lord of all tyria 15:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Who/what is stabber? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * User:Stabber. Not sure this could ever get out of hand like that, but you only need a bit of distrust...Lord of all tyria 16:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC) Lord of all tyria 16:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, the sock guy? I'd never sock, though..? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 21:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.