User talk:Warwick/Archive 17

Omg.. Spam..
O_o.. Last archive.. O_o -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 23:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I deleted it, but you moved it while I was. EC ftl. --Shadowcrest 23:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Dont blank my page plx. I dont like comments to be removed from pages. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 23:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't blank it. I only deleted fire's stuff. --Shadowcrest 23:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, he's so uncreative with his spam. :P Lord Belar 18:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Licencing restrictions
The Creative Commons 2.0 by-nc-sa (Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic) is a licence that is incompatable with the Gnu Free Documentation licence. You see the userboxes that some users have

that tells them that their work is licenced under both. RT | Talk  13:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Information isnt though, since its a public domain. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 14:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * But the way it is presented is, needs to be rewriteen RT | Talk</B>  14:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * True. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 14:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Needs Moar Splammaorage
But im not making the same mistake as last night, Fire, please dont spam more then 20kb. And no more then 3k in one edit, okay? Thanks. -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3k, that's a lot of spamconsideringhowicantypeforeverorjustgetrandomgoogleresults.Google

Enables users to search the Web, Usenet, and images. Features include PageRank, caching and translation of results, and an option to find similar pages. Stock quote for GOOG www.google.com/ - 6k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this iGoogle www.google.com/ig - Similar pages - Note this [ More results from www.google.com ] Google Video Go to Google Video Home ... America: Freedom to Fascism - Director'... video.google.com. Now playing ... Post Punk Kitchen - Episode 1. video.google.com ... video.google.com/ - 127k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this News results for google

Slippery Brick	Magellan's GPRS-connected Elite 5340 offers Google Live Search - 1 hour ago In addition to providing access to Google's real time search, the wireless GPRS connection delivers real-time traffic information and local weather ... PC Magazine - 75 related articles » Google Patent Imagines Robots Indexing The Grocery Aisle - InformationWeek - 10 related articles » Goodbye Google, Hello Startups - InformationWeek - 4 related articles » Google Maps Provides directions, interactive maps, and satellite/aerial imagery of the United States. Can also search by keyword such as type of business. maps.google.com/ - 69k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this Google Groups Searchable archive of more than 700 million Usenet postings from a period of more than 20 years. groups.google.com/ - 24k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this <font color="Blue">RT </B>| <font color="Black">Talk</B>  21:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I had 7' edit conflicts, one of wich were 2 posts on RT's talk, just to repeat what progger said by EC'ing me.... ffs --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 21:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I wonder how much spam my page will have by tommorow.. Night =/ --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAM SPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMSPAMvvv21:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC) <font color="Blue">RT </B>| <font color="Black">Talk</B>  21:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)v21:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC) If my calculations are correct, my signing 10 times will take up exactly 3kb. Will check. -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

-- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC) -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC) -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC) -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC) -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC) -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC) -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC) -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC) -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC) -- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm, looks like my sig takes up less KB then i thought it did. Odd.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Signing *17* times should make it work. Calculations will be tested now. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 12:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

-- <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 12:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Precisely 180kb from my sig. Interesting. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 12:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

/sulk
/sulk somewhere else, plx. was watching my dad get a triple bogey on wii golf :P --<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Shadowcrest  21:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I like eating bogeys <font color="Blue">RT </B>| <font color="Black">Talk</B>  21:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I liek sulking, though! =D --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 15:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Wow.
No, the account wasn't made JUST FOR THE BEAR. I had just never needed to help add anything. This has been my account name for anything.--Norrukki 20:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, please always assume good faith Warwick. Thanks.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 20:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I was GW:AGF'ing. I only asked if the acc had been made for the polar bear. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 20:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Which isn't AGFing, thinking hes a sock about something for the polar bear :P --<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Shadowcrest  20:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No, i merely stated that it seemed like he was a sock for the polar bear. I never actually said he was, blame RT! =D --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 20:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Regardless of how you said it, the same message was conveyed.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 20:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope, i never accused him of it. I'm very careful like that. I can say what i want without breaking policies. I never said that he was a sock, i said that he seemed to be a sock. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 20:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * We don't go by the word of the policy here, we go by the spirit of it. How would you like it if you went to GWW help it out, and people said you seemed to be a sock?--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 20:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Wouldnt really mind. 'cause I know that im not one. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 20:18, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Ugh. You do understand my point, correct? If you have a negative opinion about someone, please keep it to yourself or in private with someone.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 20:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I get your point. I was just taking the piss out of your bad example. =P. And yeah, normally I wouldnt, but it seemed so.. Fake O_o.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 20:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Plus, it's not like sockpuppets are techinically illegal, and it's not like it was a vote on whether it should stay or not, which majority winning, so what difference does it make? For all you know, he was my sock that created the page. Read hidden message. --[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I Lol'd. Anyways, im off for now i guess. C'ya later everyone. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 20:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Do NOT
do NOT disrupt the wiki to make a point. To demonstrate advanced techniques, please do it on your own sandbox pages. -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 21:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * What? Sorry pan, i was trying to give Entropy and Marco a demo of what i thought was a new type of vandalism, I hadnt understood that it was linking to a.. Disgusting.. Site, since it didnt work on my internet provider. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 15:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

What the hell did you do to my talkpage? You broke the History. (T/C) 19:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * He added some code in wich showed a part of the History of Cathedral of flames. After I removed that (and the position:abolute link with it, wich he placed by accident. His browser ignores the link, so he never noticed it), you can't revisit his revision, somehow. I have thesame problem on my sandbox now. But it's just a sandbox ^^ I'll set up my sandbox to show you what he did, again. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 11:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, side note: He didn't screw up on coding like I did ^^' It all still looked normal, rather than completely screwed over --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 11:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Bad Spam - Link to Gross Images
It has happened again to Talk:Diamond Aegis. Thought you should know. <font color="DarkGoldenRod">Himm <font color="Red">Taeguk  (T/C) 16:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Why am I one of the three people you decide to tell? I feel so important! =D. Anyway, if it happens again, and you cant remove it, just tell me, i can remove it no prob, since my Browser blocks everything except a few sites.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 16:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I also told MP and Entropy. But I thought you would be instrested in knowing. I have un done it and someone has placed a Ban tag on the user <font color="DarkGoldenRod">Himm <font color="Red">Taeguk  (T/C) 16:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * This is really getting on my nerves... I want unique vandalism, if any at all! The random vandals usually go at least a little creative, but this one just repeats his trick. meh. Although no vandalism would be just perfect, the world ain't, and thus, nothing can be. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 16:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * And something without pictures of peoples ass. I browse this at work, and I usually click the page atleast 3 times before I get it fixed :-D <font color="DarkGoldenRod">Himm <font color="Red">Taeguk  (T/C) 16:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * ... I hope noone passes by as you 'fix' it :P --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 16:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Lmao, =P --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 16:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)