GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Felix Omni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Felix Omni (talk &bull; contribs &bull; Edit Count)
I'm requesting adminship for two reasons. First, as tonight's events have shown, we still do not have a wide enough sysop base to ensure around-the-clock security- particularly because several sysops are currently so enraged by Wikia that they've become temporarily inactive. Second, I'm on GuildWiki many hours every day. This wiki more or less taught me how to play Guild Wars, an obsession into which I've poured thousands of hours now. I feel that I owe this site my loyalty, regardless of Wikia problems, a declining contributer community, and everything else we've had to deal with. So I'd like to spend my time on the wiki being as helpful as I possibly can- and I feel that sysop privileges would give me the opportunity to do just that. 09:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 09:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Felix Omni was made a sysop on 4-9-08.

Support

 * 1) He's very active on the wiki and I agree with him that we still don't have enough sysops. Good contributions, active, vigilant :P what more can we ask for haha... Silver Sunlight [[Image:SSunlight.jpg|19px]] 09:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Felix has been here for a while, tends to avoid 'drama,' and knows the ropes of the wiki.  In addition, he's active nearly every night, where vandals often find no admin/sysop resistance.  I vote support. :] [[Image:Maui_sig.png]] 09:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Total support, honestly, based on the amount of times I've seen him, and the quality of the advice he's given to other people, I thought he already had this position. He's shown through numerous contributions that he's willing to go through the mundane minor edits to fix errors. He's supportive in each time I've seen him and a dedicated member. The only problem I've ever had with him (occasional treatment of Lost-Blue), has stemmed mostly as a result of improving the wiki, rather than malice. Overall, a compassionate, dedicated member deserving of adminship, regardless of occasional bluntness with mildly offensive users. --Powersurge360 09:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Whilst I think we have enough sysops to cover, more is always a good thing, that's why I support this nomination RT  | Talk  09:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Felix frequently afk's in-game to monitor this wiki, and despite it being inexpressably annoying, I admire his dedication. He's also been an officer for some time now and has show maturity and observed politeness interacting with other players. Valure
 * 6) I support because he's everywhere. If I look on a talkpage, I'll find his signature. And he's all over the "new, hot stuff" Might not seem much, but i think it counts. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 11:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Support, he's reliable and trustworthy. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 11:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Didn't know this was here :O. Obvious support. Cress Arvein(Talk) 15:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) (your vote here)

Neutral

 * 1) Frequent activity, enough seniority, known(may be a bad thing). At times easily frustrated and quick to judgement Zulu Inuoe 09:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Active as he may be, he takes offense and gets frustrated easily a lot, as well as somtimes, like me, lacks matureness. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 11:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.