User talk:GW-Agent

....Oh my. This build has extroardinarily severe energy problems. 06:21, 16 March 2007 (CDT)
 * (I see it's your userpage, but just commenting before it gets torn apart in the actual tested section.) [[Image:ShidoSig_moebius2.gif]] 06:23, 16 March 2007 (CD

Energy!!!!71.215.245.84 17:17, 16 March 2007 (CDT)

I have countered those problems by using a blood idol (energy +12) as well as the gladiator type of armor (also increases energy) if put together correctly you can have 48 energy that is restored via the zelious sword.0 ~Agent~

Drop touch for rez sig. And you have enrgy problems, touches are expensive, that's why touch rangers ahve to use OoB(and even then they're damage output is sub-par) --Dazra 04:22, 17 March 2007 (CDT)

While I don't have energy problems when I use the equipment listed I must say that plague touch is important to counter the effects of poison and bleeding, not to forget its a nasty surprise to have your conditions come back at ya. ~Agent~

yha dude, major energy probles even with 48 energy as a warrior this dont look like such a great build.

Even at maximum Energy, I don't like it. Leave the casting to Necromancers, and you go up and kill everything. The only viable thing here I see is Plague Touch, which is actually good on... anything. Oh, and aside from that, you'll have a a bunch of meta-gamers making fun of you if you use this. La va Ed ge 324 ++ 11:11, 17 March 2007 (CDT)

Completely, utterly crappy.Cheese Slaya 12:48, 17 March 2007 (CDT)

Say what you well but it's won me alot of battle and well kill any W 1 on 1. ~Agent~

GW is not 1 vs 1. This build is real crap, you have less energy than N primary, less damage and less ene regen. Unfavored - (Abedeus) 16:39, 17 March 2007 (CDT)

Rate-a-build
''Please test and vote on new builds. Testing is encouraged but not required.''

Favored:
 * 1) (your vote here)

Unfavored:
 * 1) Seriously, this is just a piece of crap. A warrior with no energy, no energy pip, and no damage. Say what you whant, but this is horrible.--Manbeast15 17:16, 17 March 2007 (CDT)