GuildWiki talk:Salt

We dont really get a lot of pages like that, do we? Except for the famous Under Discussion page, or what was it? --- -- (s)talkpage 22:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thought it might be useful RT 22:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * What counts as commonly created tbh. Lord of all tyria 22:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Is this because of that hoax, (well I think it is), about the Everlasting Yuletide Tonic? Regardless I say we should go for this idea however how would it work? Are you suggesting formulating a list with words such as "hi" and "toilet" and "cardboard" or waiting until a vandal page shows up then add it to the list so it could be warded against forevermore... :P Saul Lachance 22:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Why is this called "salt"? How do we decide what pages fall under this category? What if something is protected and it ends up existing? Do we have the ability to protect pages without having them exist? I think that was an update... &mdash;&clubs; Jedi &clubs; Rogue &clubs; 23:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Seriously, why Salt? How about GW:NAV  No Accidental Vandalism.  Because people who make those pages usually don't make them in spite.--Gigathrash  23:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the mediawiki update that lets you protect redlinks hasn't happened yet, but there are very few constantly vandalized pages, so this is unneeded in my opinion.[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]]Entrea Sumatae  [Talk]  23:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This seems unnecessary to me as well. --Shadowcrest 03:46, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Probably would've been useful a year ago, but we hardly get any "random accidental vandalism" like that anymore. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 04:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)