User:Relyk/Favorites/Vote Drama

Vote Drama
If you think there are better variants available, use them. Do not throw an instant unfavored vote in. Also, the usage says you should not stay away from your monks wich also concludes that you should have monks. This is really no good reason to unfavor it same for defiant elements who always does what the community does to look like an expert Guild Wars player. Sometimes you need to throw in a completely different build to see what happens. If it unfavored, okay. But I want at least some good reasons for it. Also 3 unfavoured votes on one day with the same reason wtf? This looks very suspicious. I think no one tested it and and Defiant just agrees with mcmullen because defiant does NEVER has a own explanation. As i said, you should not unfavor it if there are better variants available because I think that is impossible. You think the variant section is just there to be looked at? No. If you don't like the build the way it is, you should use a variant. But you dont just unfavour it. Oh yea, Warskull I also dont think "-" is a good explanation why you don't like it. I think this just means your too lazy to test it. If the build doesn't look good, or is too good for you, you just unfavour it. Now i don't want angry reactions because i have insulted you, cause i dont want a debate with all of you, waste of time. Also, Mcmullen, You said "with no healing" You should say "without healing" Now i think dumb people rate my build and i don't want that. Sorry for the insults, I'm just saying what it is and don't want a big discussion cause they take too much time. Fable Warlord 05:15, 3 January 2007 (CST)
 * Cut it with the personal attacks, and seriously: chill out dude. Entropy 05:36, 3 January 2007 (CST)

The whole point of voting Unfavored on the basis that better, vetted variants are available is completely logical. The Favored status is not meant for builds that, quite frankly, are bad. Our policy is to only favor the best builds, and if there's another build that does the same job, only better? Unfavored vote. You say you stay close to Monks and need Monks. I can thus conclude this build is not meant for RA, Competitive Missions, or TA. In those you cannot be guaranteed of Monk support nor can you effectively split party with this build - you must hang back, something a Warrior should not be doing in PvP. You, sir, are sounding quite pretentious - I think you're the one who wants to sound like an "expert Guild Wars player", to quote you. 3 Unfavored votes in a day. Nothing wrong with that. It happens all the time on GWiki and I'm sick of folks like you complaining about it and shouting "Vote Conspiracy!" Please consider, Sir, that some of us have run builds exactly like this in the past and found them to be inferior. Myself included. I have tested a build exactly like this and found it inferior to other vetted hammer builds. Again, no personal attacks. It is not constructive to the discussion and has no place in here. Sir, you do not even understand what an Unfavored vote and a Variant is. If I look at your skillbar on the build and I see crap. What do I do? I look at the Variants section. Now, I use the variants and what happens? I still get a crappy skillbar that doesn't test well. What is the end result? An Unfavored vote. That is what Unfavored is all about. Moreover, you can not argue that "a build should not be unfavored just because there are better variant builds out there". That is completely wrong, Sir, and it goes in direct contradiction with the very definition of the build vetting process. You are employing twisted logic. Cut it with the grammar lessons, if you can't even be bothered to capitalize your "i"'s then you have no place telling others how to write. Finally - if a skillbar looks like crap, that is basis for an Unfavored vote. And this skillbar does. But not only that, it tests like crap and is an inferior build. The people who have voted know this and hence their votes. You, the build author, choose to ignore that and summarily dismiss the votes as "too lazy to test it". Now, Sir, who looks dumb in that situation? Entropy 05:36, 3 January 2007 (CST)

Really just shut the fuck up if you only got even worse reasons. First of all, i dont like healing signet. It sucks, when you get under fire it can completely kill you and it only gives back approximately 100 health depending on tactics. Also where did I said this was meant for shit random arena's? Oh yea, and you also think if a skillbar looks crap its immediatly unfavoured. Also you give me a reasonable build to serve this ones job. For example in gvg the enemy has most of the time three monks. You have three of these Mokele Hammers. Each one takes a monk with full adrenaline, kills it and death to the whole team quickly follows. You can also couple this with a sword or axe warrior, and yet i only get to see another crap reason. Thanks. Oh yea to answer your question who looks dumb, you are. And if you want to use your beloved crap Healing signet switch it out and you have a better skillbar than your life. You also didn't test this cause your the most lazy of all. I also said i didn't want a fucking discussion with even greater losers. Sincerely Fable Warlord 05:51, 3 January 2007 (CST)

Sorry but your just the kind of player that buys more userslots for himself while there are kids out there without food being tortured women raped animals shot. I think wtf are we doing here. Sorry for my insults again but sometimes you deserve themFable Warlord 05:57, 3 January 2007 (CST)


 * You may want to get your eyes checked. I never mentioned Healing Signet. Did you see the Sort Me category. You refuse to put this build in any categories, how is anyone supposed to know what you want the build to be used for? Yes, if a skillbar Looks like crap AND test like crap, it should be unfavored. Test is the key word.
 * Three of these? What the hell is that? Call it a Team:Mokele Hammer if you're going to use arguments like that. You listed it as a single build and that is how folks are using it. No one posts a build and argues that it's good "because you have three of them". If you want to argue in GvG, list it as a GvG build. Hell, give me a full team of eight Wammos and it'll wipe the floor with your Mokele hammers. That's how bad it is. But you know? GvG doesn't work like that. No one in their right mind runs three identical builds on a GvG team. That's just sheer idiocy. Couple with a Sword or Axe Warrior? That means absolutely nothing. You have no links to other related Warrior builds nor do you list this as part of a Team strategy.
 * Do you know what "dumb" means? Let me tell you: it means making yourself look immature. Which you are. It means swearing at honest-to-God people who are trying to help you. Which you are. It means acting childishly by saying "Oh, don't argue with me, I don't want a fucking argument with losers, but I can post whatever the fuck I want." That's you. And by the way? You may want to look in a mirror before calling anyone a loser.
 * I am happy to see that you have psychic powers and that you can read my mind, being able to magically tell that I didn't test the build. That's the typical sore-loser build author defense. "He gave me an Unfavored vote, he didn't test it!" That is just so pathetic...you can't even accept the simple fact that others have tested this build and found it to suck. In your mind, it's the perfect build, and wow, it works for you. Congratulations. Does that mean we here at Wiki favor it? Gods, no. Learn the rules before you post something like this and then have an emotional breakdown over it, ok?
 * Finally: you need an eyesight exam. I didn't mention Healing Signet at all.


 * Okay, what? Where did that come from? What makes you think I buy character slots? Moreover, who are you to be the judge of moral righteousness, when you are clearly the one in the wrong here? You're the kind of person most likely to not care about any of those tradgedies - at least, that is how I interpret your pathetic comments here. You display a startling lack of maturity; compassion; integrity; kindness; and plain common sense. And you argue that you care about women getting raped. You make me laugh.


 * "Wtf are we doing here." I could ask the same thing. I'm arguing with someone who has the mind and vocabulary of a fifth-grader. Someone who, refusing to acknowledge any criticism, chooses to blatantly lash out at people in an angry, hormonal tirade of insults and poorly worded, illogical arguments. And you call me a loser. The fault is always on the aggressor, and in this case my friend? That would be you. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Entropy 06:10, 3 January 2007 (CST)

Yes I raped your mother, accidently. I'm 4 years old how? Don't get the wrong point and i know exactly what you think of me and its true. I am saying what is bad about the world while i don't do something about it. But I mention it and you say my comments are poorly worded BUT they, the poorly worded insults like you say, are piercing trough your whole body, relaxed. You don't know what it means neither do I. But i DO know what it means without knowing it. I know it might seem like Shakespeare poetry but its not. You think im the kind of philosophy guy, wrong. I AM. I rape everyone i see and they like it. Fable Warlord 06:16, 3 January 2007 (CST)

You rape me, i rape you back. Thats what it is all about. Smartness... what is it? Using words that are hard to understand so you might come over smart. No, you do. Thats it and you don't know it. I nearly killed my teacher, Socrates. He's dead now. You know why? He drunk of the bottle of poison, thats what they think. No i did it, nearly, but i didn't. Socrates isn't even my teacher. Though I nearly killed my teacher which isn't Socrates but I call Socrates because he was so good. My teacher doesn't exist neither do you, neither do I. Wtf am i saying now? I don't know. What i do know is that this isn't going about my build at all and that i should say it to Wikipedia. But you, the "Smart" people must die. For what? For the humanity. The only way to save it is to kill it.


 * To quote Skuld: WTF are you smoking?! Entropy 06:24, 3 January 2007 (CST)

I smoke your motherfucking ass. Fable Warlord 06:28, 3 January 2007 (CST)

Insult me
Please I'm not crazy sorry for what i said. I know what you think that I'm just trying to be a smart idiot crazy moron. I am them all except for smart. I am smart in me head and im happy with that ^^ (Cause it rhymes) Happy new 2008! ! SOrry! PEACE TO THE WORLD! I HATE YOU! Fable Warlord 06:36, 3 January 2007 (CST)


 * Right. Do you expect me to believe that, after what you said? So much for remaining civil...As to your previous posts. Regardless of the fact that they are in large part illegible...Do you hate smart people? I'm not one of them, nor do I pretend to be. I have no clue where you got that idea. "Big Words that are hard to understand". Well...I guess you are calling yourself stupid, then? No comment there. You reference Shakespeare and Socrates...why? Do you think that makes you look smart? It doesn't, sorry - grade school children know about Shakespeare and Socrates. You also seem to have an uncanny obsession with rape. Have you seen a psychiatrist for that? You may be a latent sexual predator. For that matter, you seem to be fascinated with death as well. Are you suicidal. There's a hotline for that you know.
 * Humanity would be better off without folks like you, thanks. I would at least like my neighbors to be able to speak an intelligle amount of English.
 * Oh...I've heard that before...who told me that? Oh yeah, the middle school kid who jaywalked across the street right in front of a bus today. The driver was not happy, "WTF are you smoking, kid!" "I smoke your -- - -- !" Such an informative answer. May I commend you on the originality of your insults? So full of pent-up emotional baggage and teenage angst...ahh, it's a beautiful sight to behold. You, Sir, are a true literary master. Entropy 06:41, 3 January 2007 (CST)
 * Kid? You really are starting to scare me. By my reckoning you are either very, very drunk or else suffering from mental delusions such as being high on drugs. It really is not a smart idea to post on GWiki in either circumstance. Please, at least try to make some sort of coherent sentence when you type... Entropy 06:48, 3 January 2007 (CST)

THANKS FOR MAKING ME LOOK LIKE A COMPLETE MORON WHO ONLY CARES ABOUT HIMSELF AND THINKS HE'S SMART. Fable Warlord 06:46, 3 January 2007 (CST) PAWN YOUR ASS SORRY Say IT aftER a Insssult or it isnt usefuUl

Sorry I'll now talk with normal language
This build is unfavoured for reasons i don't like but the community does. Im not stronger than humanity. If the whole world says 1+1=3 IT IS IF THE WHOLE WORLD SAYS 3X3=PUDDING IT IS THOUGH I SAY THE CORRECT ANSWERS WICH AREN't Correct because of you. You got my relaxing point now? Sorry again Fable Warlord 06:52, 3 January 2007 (CST)


 * I have to point out that just because you say you're right, doesn't make you right. Other than that...no comment...it was less than six users who even commented on this page. That is hardly "humanity". I'm really at a loss as to how you figure these things out. And your usage of relaxing is confusing me. Entropy 06:55, 3 January 2007 (CST)

I was saying that, whatever I think, the humanity is correct. Fable Warlord 07:09, 3 January 2007 (CST)

If i was drunk or high on drugs i couldn't open Internet Explorer nor type in www.guildwiki.org
Sorry if I have insulted you with this. No kidding :0 HAHAAA I'm just so angry that life is without a goal in the future we will know it. Whats behind black holes, if aliens exist. You see a meteor made earth out of balance. God didn't make people, a meteor did. Thanks meteor! I even gave him a name, the saver of humanity. Ok now his name was P;. No it wasn't p;. It was Dobbey, my little cute doggy which is the only thing i still love in the world. No it wasn't it was: and here it comes... Albert! Great name. Oh yea, and even one person is humanity and you should respect him whatever he was. Oh and you do buy additional slots cause i saw 11 characters.


 * Now all I can say is the classical quote from video game protagonists everywhere: "..." Entropy 07:04, 3 January 2007 (CST)

What are Protagonists Alien form of Roman Praetorians? HAHAHAha HA. And if i was a lil kid my mom wouldn't let me watch saw cause me moms a good mom. Now i feel sorry for meself becos peoples thinks i crazy. OiO want that though, then how can i don't like it. Me daddy also a good daddy. Though he is high sometimes (Taht Legal HolLAdnNd) he's good dad. Oh what did I had good parents and me grandparents.

PLEASE DELETE THIS IN PAGE
PLEASE THIS IS ABOUT NOTHING THAN BULLCRAP WHICH I AM~!!! THANKS EVERYONE