Category talk:Templates

Is is possible to put all templates in here, or would that produce problems with the templates or the namespace? Searching templates is one of my least favorite occupations. --Xeeron 22:40, 10 February 2006 (CST)

Just make sure to noinclude the categorization... for multi-piece templates we might even sub-cat them. -PanSola 22:43, 10 February 2006 (CST)

Nice idea, what about all my zillions of templates that have little use? :P 23:04, 10 February 2006 (CST)

Just tell me where they are and I'll get the delete template ready ;-)

No seriously, just wiki templates here, no stuff that is used on User pages only. --Xeeron 03:16, 11 February 2006 (CST)

What's wrong with using [ Allpages (Template namespace)] instead? --Rezyk 03:31, 11 February 2006 (CST)


 * One big issue, one small. Big issue - I had no idea that existed. Small issue: Templates cant be grouped in subcategories.


 * Oh and with big issue I dont totally mean that I am to stupid (only to 75% hehe): Since I didnt know about that page after contributing for several months, I'd say it is a good guess that more than 95% of all wiki users dont know that page. And it is not linked to anywhere (anywhere I looked at least).


 * PS: Span class?? plainlinks? Server (why does this look like a template and is not listed in the link you just gave)? --Xeeron 04:04, 11 February 2006 (CST)


 * Hmm..actually I suspect you knew about that page but forgot all about it. ;)
 * ... supresses any external link icons.
 * SERVER and localurl are special magic words in MediaWiki -- particularly handy when the site domain name isn't stable.
 * Rezyk 05:40, 11 February 2006 (CST)


 * Fyren even posted a similar link as you did once on my talk page (or somewhere) but it stopped working a while ago. Maybe I should have investigated =)


 * And yes, I claim old age lol. It starts all going downhill after you hit 20 ;-) --Xeeron 06:28, 11 February 2006 (CST)

Stuck for categorising
I read that above and don't get it. lol. I tried categorising some stuff but it is incredibly hard to think what to put stuff under, 50%+ deserve their own category :p 03:21, 13 February 2006 (CST)