Talk:Sentinel's armor

That's some sweet armor. >_> Evan The Cursed (Talk) 08:44, 11 March 2006 (CST)

do NOT buy it's helm, looks like a stonesummit that got melted :p 08:55, 11 March 2006 (CST)

Is the armor bonus from this global, such as how Superior Aborption runes work? --Insidious420 17:30, 6 February 2007 (CST)


 * The bonus armor only applies to the part that it's covering. If you have gloves with a Sentinel's insignia, it will have an additional 20 armor if your hands are hit with elemental damage (of course, if you have 13 Strength). --Glynnis   17:38, 6 February 2007 (CST)

New runner gear?
I think we've got some new runner armours:
 * Sentinel's Armor - 100 armour, runners meet the strength req
 * Legionnaire's Armor - 80 armour, +20against physical, +10 in a stance

it looks like legionaire's will be 90 or 110 and sentinels in the middle :)

Can anyone confirm that you will get the 100 AL if your Strength is at exactly 13?
 * Haven't tested it yet, but I do not consider 13 to be "below 13". Is there a particular reason that makes you suspicious of the armor value at 13? - 22:28, 19 May 2006 (CDT)
 * Tested and straightforward 100AL req strength 13 or higher. Below req strength sentinal is 80AL

Picture wrong for Kurzick
It is actually showing Kurzick armor dyed silver, not undyed. Take a look at Warrior Kurzick Armor to see.
 * Looking at the others, it appears a lot of the warrior armor pages have the wrong image (Above comment was me, too). - 04:31, 1 September 2006 (CDT)

Interaction with Weakness?
It has been tested and confirmed that exactly 13 Strength is required to activate the bonus AL on Sentinel's armor. Suppose you have exactly 13 Str, and then become affected by weakness, temporarily reducing your Str to 12. It is my assumption that this would disable the Sentinel's bonus.

As many warriors in PvP use only a minor rune to get Str to 13 (to avoid any HP penalty), cursing them with weakness would effectively strip 20 AL vs elemental damage. If this is correct, it would be somewhat useful for spike teams. Can anybody confirm/deny this theory?

Thanks, Lennalf 18:59, 12 May 2007 (CDT)