User talk:Skuld/Archive 22

He's back...
Glad to see you again Skuld. :) --  Vallen Frostweaver  08:07, 8 February 2007 (CST)

zzz... how do I add and not have it screw up my page? I want it near the top... but it doesn't format well with my page. At all. Is there a way to move it around like a userbox, and still have it add me to the category? -Auron  08:09, 8 February 2007 (CST)


 * From what?--Dr.D 08:10, 8 February 2007 (CST)


 * No one ever stays gone for long. @Auron, you can either add the user box and place

so it will not "merge" into your other information or you can live without a userbox, you can add. &mdash; Gares 08:28, 8 February 2007 (CST)


 * Gares, wikiholism is a serious illness in the world today. It's tough to stay away.  --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:04, 8 February 2007 (CST)


 * I hate WP, its so grind-heavy! &mdash; Skuld 15:54, 8 February 2007 (CST)

Welcome back! -- S i  g  m  A   13:38, 8 February 2007 (CST)

WB--JP 13:43, 8 February 2007 (CST)


 * Welcome back :) Good idea to stay away from the builds...it's a shambles... :( &mdash; Hyperion` [[image:Hyperion_sig_icon.png]] (talk) 13:48, 8 February 2007 (CST)


 * Glad to see you didn't take too much time off. Good luck proving Tanaric wrong...and good idea staying away from the builds (they're evil anyway :P).&mdash; [[Image:Azroth sig.png||builds]] Azroth  [[Image:Azroth sig2.png||talk]]  16:23, 8 February 2007 (CST)

<3 –Ichigo724 19:46, 8 February 2007 (CST)
 * Yay you're back!! -Lania Elderfire 20:40, 8 February 2007 (CST)

Nice to see you are back. I took the liberty of looking in your contribution history because a lot of people were saying you were a major contributor. (I only came last year so I didnt know too much) I could see why people must have nominated you as admin. I hope you still contribute like you used to.--&mdash; Hyprodimus Prime   20:58, 8 February 2007 (CST)

welcome back. Defiant Elements 00:22, 10 February 2007 (CST)

/wave --Nocturne   00:18, 12 February 2007 (CST)

GFDL
Just for reference, please say you agree with releasing your work under the GFDL/Biro adding the template to your user page. --Fyren 08:55, 9 February 2007 (CST)


 * I've sent Skuld a private message asking him to post his agreement to the FDL here.  &lt;LordBiro&gt;/&lt;Talk&gt; 09:03, 9 February 2007 (CST)

Yes, I agree with releasing my work under the GFDL. &mdash; Skuld 09:46, 9 February 2007 (CST)

What's GFLD? -- SigmA 12:31, 13 February 2007 (CST)

GNU Free Documentation License --Jamie  04:30, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Auto
Because you asked before Auron! --Xasxas256 08:03, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 * That is totally replacing my doorhandle. &mdash; Skuld 08:03, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 * Heh that was quick, looks like you've woken up now! --Xasxas256 08:04, 21 February 2007 (CST)

Conspiracy?!
Hey Skuld! Whenever I use Microsoft Word and the "auto-correct" option is on, it automagically changes Skuld to scold. You don't happen to have any stock invested in Microsoft, do you?! /paranoia (T/C) 08:08, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 * If Skuld had a hand in MS Word's auto correction, I suspect typing Skuld would change to RtSpike ftw!! ;) &mdash; Gares 08:16, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 * And I found out today that it's "Skulled" not "Skulldee". I should have used Microsoft Sam more :( --Xasxas256 08:24, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 * It would replace Skuld with skud. Skud skud.  --Fyren 10:03, 21 February 2007 (CST)

Skuld –Ichigo724 10:06, 21 February 2007 (CST) Also: I know "ichigo" means strawberry, no need to point that out :P –Ichigo724 10:06, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 * Skuld, did you discover an asteroid? Lol, that is if you were alive in 1929 and your real name is Karl Reinmuth :P. Plus, if you'd named it it'd be called 1337 Skuld rather than 1130 Skuld xD &mdash;  Hyperion` [[image:Hyperion_sig_icon.png]] (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2007 (CST)

"Skuld can provide courses to help raise awareness and increase common knowledge" Sign me up! Wow and aparently its free for members too, what's it take to be a member of Skuld School?Not a fifty five 11:00, 22 February 2007 (CST)


 * Avast! &mdash; Skuld 11:21, 22 February 2007 (CST)

Rather, I wasn't aware that Skuld was a Bisexual scandinavian princess. Didn't know they had such complete surgery with the vocal cords, Skuld. -Silk Weaker 11:25, 22 February 2007 (CST)


 * lol, this is scary. But Ichigo...please sweetie...don't get me started on Anime references.  If we get into that I cant say when it will ever stop. <3&mdash; [[Image:Azroth sig.png||builds]] Azroth  [[Image:Azroth sig2.png||talk]]  16:47, 22 February 2007 (CST)


 * Yeah I think skuld must be throwing his voice and must be a girl. More evidence: &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Not a fifty five (contribs).


 * * points at his above post* :P. Also, Azroth, anime references don't bug me, I'm not too sure about other people though ^^ –Ichigo724[[Image:Ichigo-signature.jpg]] 21:20, 22 February 2007 (CST)
 * What's wrong with anime? :-) --Lania Elderfire[[Image:Pinkribbonsig.gif|My Talk]] 23:21, 22 February 2007 (CST)


 * Nothing...but once I start it's hard to stop. ^_^ I just don't want to get into an anime c h a t on Skulds talk page...that's all <3&mdash; [[Image:Azroth sig.png||builds]] Azroth  [[Image:Azroth sig2.png||talk]]  19:23, 23 February 2007 (CST)

–Ichigo724 19:47, 23 February 2007 (CST)

Just out of curiosity, how much hate-mail do you get Skuld?Cheese Slaya 19:53, 23 February 2007 (CST)

Rofl Solus   20:03, 23 February 2007 (CST)

Seriosuly...lol. So many people form anti-skuld forces that I thought it'd be fun to know.Cheese Slaya 20:04, 23 February 2007 (CST)


 * They usually disband when their diapers need changing ;) &mdash; Skuld 20:43, 23 February 2007 (CST)


 * I refuse to stop commenting after a comment like that lol (Not a fifty five 00:43, 24 February 2007 (CST))

Thank you
Thanks very much for reverting his edits to my userpage, hoping the damage done will be under control soon. I've literally been panicing for the last few minutes hitting refresh afraid to see what would be next. Hoping this will all be fixed soon. (ARGH, forgot to sign...) Shas&#39;o Kauyon 04:10, 1 March 2007 (CST)

You're Going To Hell
God Hates You. 70.231.233.201 04:11, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 * Yeah but wiki hates you and we're more powerful cause we can ban you :D (Not a fifty five 05:38, 1 March 2007 (CST))
 * I think the unknown dude is jealous on the famous Skuld :) --InfestedHydralisk 13:22, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * Of what he should be jealous? --Glenn 11:36, 10 March 2007 (CST)
 * The playpen door seems to have blown open again.. damn these winds! :( &mdash; Skuld 11:46, 10 March 2007 (CST)

[[Image:Wingsthatheal-icon.jpg]] "Wings"
Almost top 5 liked to pages, must be pretty like Skuld. lol -- "Wings" 07:53, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 * no. 6. lol

thanks for the link skuld halad of talhir

"Bad Content" on Secondary professions for an Assassin
What made it bad content? From what I could see, much of what was removed was useful information. &mdash; Ebany Salmonderiel (Talk) [ Leave a note] 14:21, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * Point some examples out please &mdash; Skuld 14:24, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * The ideas for A/E, for example. &mdash;[[Image:Alert.PNG]] Ebany Salmonderiel (Talk) [ Leave a note] 08:05, 3 March 2007 (CST)

Portal Mage
Hai, when I was SoC confirmed the Portal Mage, I noticed it's name is Margonite Portal Mage, instead of Portal Mage, can you fix it? :) Thanks - EDIT: Did it myself, it's redirecting to it atm. Cracko 08:19, 3 March 2007 (CST)

Archiving
You suggested to someone to archive thier build page if they do not want it viewed. How do I do that? -jupsto


 * Click the move tab and add /Archive on the end or something, then edit the original page to put a link to it &mdash; Skuld 08:38, 4 March 2007 (CST)

Uploading image
I want to upload some pictures for my user page, does the size warning also counts for these images? Sorry for the question but i couldn't found this in GW:IMAGE Jelmewnema 09:39, 5 March 2007 (CST)


 * I'd stick by "Any image that is larger than a few hundred kilobytes can cause issues for people trying to view the page that it is used on, so it is asked that images be kept under 150K." :) &mdash; Skuld 10:07, 5 March 2007 (CST)
 * And thnx for the quick response.Jelmewnema 10:09, 5 March 2007 (CST)

Process for delete tag
I flagged my own build for delete for a short bit (link is [Build:E/any Renewing Daggers|E/any Renewing Daggers] ), but now I am having strong second thoughts on it, as I noticed that in my opinion, the build I submitted does the job better than the build mentioned, for reasons outlined in the talk page. Can I remove the tag myself since I submitted it (I don't think I can), or would I have to have someone remove it for me? The wording stats "but do not remove this notice from articles that you have created yourself." and although I flagged it, I certainly also created it myself, so I'm waiting before doing anything. Shas&#39;o Kauyon 10:33, 5 March 2007 (CST)


 * Yeh, just remove it unless there is a large concensus against you &mdash; Skuld 10:36, 5 March 2007 (CST)

asfds
to you too.

asfsffd sadfgsg ssss

phpbb stuff
Anyways, atm I'm using guildwiki to hold guild builds, how did you make those nifty skillbars on your phpbb forum? (Not a fifty five 04:53, 6 March 2007 (CST))
 * http://gwshack.us, you'll want to download gwBBCode 1.7.2 :) &mdash; Skuld 06:56, 6 March 2007 (CST)
 * UNLIKE SKULD. -Auron [[Image:Elit Druin.jpg|||My Talk]] 18:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Prismatic insignia
The "There is no Obsidian headgear available" is a valid note, imo. Insigniable(word?) Obsidian armor is available, but elementalist Obsidian has no headgear. Other professions DO have Obsidian headgear available. Notes are useful pieces of info, often helpful for preventing confusion - this adds more information that the first note does not provide. Tain 11:56, 7 March 2007 (CST)
 * Ah right, ok. &mdash; Skuld 12:11, 7 March 2007 (CST)

RUN AWAY!!!
...Oh god. I just found Skuld's true form. Scary thing is, it almost makes sense! (the term "makes sense" being used in the loosest way possible here.) Just make sure to read the details section. :P -- Jioruji Derako.> 23:07, 7 March 2007 (CST)
 * Oh noes! Someone beat me to it (points upwards). I was so proud of myself too, as I paced lurked in the anime section of Best Buy... --[[image:GEO-logo.png]] Jioruji Derako.> 23:11, 7 March 2007 (CST)
 * Anime scares me. &mdash; Skuld 02:48, 8 March 2007 (CST)
 * You sure it's not just the fanboys? --[[image:GEO-logo.png]] Jioruji Derako.> 04:18, 8 March 2007 (CST)
 * Omg LMAO [[Image:Tomoko's_Cookie.jpg|19px]] Tomo 12:29, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
 * On another note, this is the third time this has been brought up on this version of the talk page (didn't check the archives), last 2 times was at User talk:Skuld :P –Ichigo724[[Image:Ichigo-signature.jpg]] 23:36, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Yeah, that particular series happens to be rather popular (most anime fans have at least heard of it, if not watched it). I only just happened to see one of the new box DVDs for the series, with "Skuld" in large letters all over the side. Took a double-take and a few extra checks to make sure I was seeing it right (wasn't sure if it was a character name, but one of the other DVD's had the main character on the side).
 * Well, it's good to keep pointing this out though... for newer user's sake, of course. Save them the trouble of checking the archive or reading through Skuld's entire talk page just to find trivia like this. :P --[[image:GEO-logo.png]] Jioruji Derako.> 00:08, 12 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Absolutely right, couldn't agree more. A sticky is imminent, this belongs at the top of the talk page. (Not a fifty five 03:24, 12 March 2007 (CDT))


 * Baka!...any otaku can see that Skuld is a kawaii(or maybe bijin) ecchi okama. At least he's not a chikan, seme or uke...at least I don't think he is...but then again I don't know what his moe is.  Sorry Sempai. *glomp* <3 &mdash; [[Image:Azroth sig.png||builds]] Azroth  [[Image:Azroth sig2.png||talk]]  18:41, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

Vandalism
Skuld, could you take a look at User:137.164.143.36. He has been vandalizing some user pages and has even called one a racist. But looking at his contributions, i'm not sure whether it is vandalism or just bad humor.Jelmewnema 16:45, 8 March 2007 (CST)
 * User:137.164.143.36 was banned earlier today by Gem. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:48, 8 March 2007 (CST)
 * Proves again i don't know to find the blocklogs.:D:DJelmewnema 16:52, 8 March 2007 (CST)
 * My first ban actually. I was surprised to see that the guy hadn't been banned before although he had vandalised a lot over a longer period of time. Gave a pretty hefty ban for starters. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 17:24, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Your vote
I doubt you give care about it, but it was worth a shot - you stated in your reasons at [Build:E/Mo Protection Prodigy] the build has no condition removal or healing - Dismiss Condition solves both problems. Not to mention that Spirit Bond and RoF also heal, but they are more conditional.... I still think you might actually vote fairly and not based on your opinions of the author, but maybe that's just me being naive. NightAngel 16:27, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Not to mention he is voting fairly and not based on his opinions of the author, but maybe that's just me being naive. &mdash;[[Image:BlastThatT.jpg]]Blastedt 16:33, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 * I actually took time to explain why you don't need loads of energy, its more important how you use your skills than just spamming them and hoping it works. &mdash; Skuld 17:06, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Thanks for being of such service to the wiki, preserving the tested build section and making sure all it has are incredibly good and powerful builds. It's funny, you don't seem to give a crap about how bad some tested builds are, or even some other untested builds which were favored, but you argue for pages and pages on my build. Must be special. NightAngel 17:22, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 * No, it's because of your attitude. Stop pl0x. &mdash;[[Image:BlastThatT.jpg]]Blastedt 17:25, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Are you kidding? Skuld did a huuuuge purge on crappy tested/untested builds a long while back. I doubt anyone else deleted as many builds. Speaking of which, name some of those crappy favored builds? I'll go chuck an unfavored on it if you're right. --Silk Weaker 17:27, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Sure, here's one: [Build:Me/any E-Surge Mesmer] . For PvE it's a big pile of crap. :) There are many others, I just picked the first one I saw. NightAngel 17:36, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 * LOL. Sure it is outdated, especially since nerf, but how is that "bad"? -Silk Weaker 17:37, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 * For PvE, are you kidding me? Wow. I just wish there were some people voting blindingly favored to balance things out...Apparently I missed the good old days when anything goes :) NightAngel 17:50, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Dude, will you stop dragging PvP vs PvE into it, because it is not relevent. You duck behind anything, every comment of yours is laced with "the world is out to get me", it is tiresome. My point: you do not need to spam prot spells, as they are almost energy management in themselves, SoA or SB can cost 5 or 10 energy and save 50+ of what would be in healing spells. Not more than one guy will be hit for so much that a heavy-duty prot spell will work. RoF is great, but spamming RoF forever can be a waste of energy its self, a well-placed GoH does well to top it up. &mdash; Skuld 03:26, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
 * So what's the big deal if you cast 3 spells to do the job that two could do, if you have the energy for it? It's a different style of doing the same thing. Instead of being extremely careful and judging where to cast each spell, you can be more carefree. You still need to use the right skills in the right targets, but it gets... easier. When you don't have to worry so much. Anyway, it's done and over with. THe build is buried, and I used it way back in prophecies anyway. When i'm using my nuker these days of course I do E/A promise nuker, which is the most powerful nuking build for PvE, I won't waste the firepower on monking when the henches can do it for me. It was still a nice, decent build that some ppl might have considered fun to play and now it's buried. Dunno why you feel happy about it, but np. Done and over with. And Ps: what the heck are you talking about Skuld? I was asked to point out a bad build in tested, that mesmer build IS bad for PvE in my opinion. Of course PvE/pVP matters, because if it hadnt a pve tag, it would be fine in tested, I presume it works well in PvP, or so ppl said... So what ARE you talkin about!?! In fact, it seems SOMEONE agrees with me, because the build was archived.... NightAngel 23:35, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

Because if you just cast the two instead of the three, you get the "same thing" and have even more energy to spare... - Krowman (talk • contribs)  23:49, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

So, you lost me there, what can the prot monk do that the prodigy protector can't? Besides the obvious, which is using a prot elite. (and if it's that crucial, the ele could take it too). Slightly more powerful prot spells? So, let's say you have protective spirit lasting for 19 secs, compared to 23. Is it that important? Or a dismiss conditions healing for 65 and not 80. If u can cast 2x more dismiss conditions as the monk.... You can say it leaves u vulnerable to spikes, but thats what PS is for, and really, there isn't that many spikes in normal PvE, monsters don't talk on vent about "spiking so and so". :) At least Id be surprised as heck. ANd before you say "divine favor", lemme remind you that aura of restoration would heal you constantly for an equivalent amount. True, it wont heal others, but it's still useful. And there was DC for some healing... Not to mention that if you REALLY need to heal, you should be using healing prayers, not prot. Anyway... NightAngel 23:53, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
 * If you wan't to continue talking to me, message my page. Otherwise, I'm afraid the only way to simplify what I said before would be the word: Efficiency. - [[Image:Candle.jpg|12px]] Krowman (talk • contribs) 23:57, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

Efficiency is doing more with less. That's all fine and good, but what if you get energy drained? What if you're fighting a long battle, and there's no battery necro? What if the other monk dies, and you're under a lot of pressure, and energy is dropping? Wouldn't it be nice if you had 111 energy total and +10 regeneration? My pt is, it is a viable alternative that CAN do the prot monk's job. It has its advantages. And really, the energy difference is BRUTAL. so much that the ele can probably cast about 4-5 times as many spells as a monk in the same situation. Now, considering that the spells individually are only SLIGHTLY less effective, you're trading, hm... 20% effectiveness for up to 400-500% more spell casting power. And you really can tell me that makes no difference whatsoever? Come on... NightAngel 00:01, 16 March 2007 (CDT)

Question
I just ran across Guild Wars Wiki, and was wondering what that was all about. I ran through it and noticed you had a page on there. I also noticed alot of the pages on there were almost exactly like ours. I'm just curious why there's another site exactly like Guildwiki. 68.226.178.120 17:00, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
 * It is an official one, ran by ANet. This FAQ should help. &mdash; Skuld 17:12, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Thanks. =) Giangn626 20:42, 14 March 2007 (CDT)