User talk:Barrage

Rainbow sig stuff dfjdfjd
B a  r  r  a  g  e  TEST :D

Quite the sig. Can't wait to see what your userpage will look like :) -Auron  21:06, 22 January 2007 (CST)

Your name sig is sooo cool, may I use it plz? -- Sigm@  (talk|contribs) 11:20, 24 January 2007 (CST)
 * Isn't that sig... a bit... long? It takes up 3 lines of text... &mdash; Poki#3 [[Image:Poki.jpg|19px|My Talk Page :o]], 21:33, 26 January 2007 (CST)
 * not only is the code huge, its hard to read :( &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 12:00, 27 January 2007 (CST)
 * :( -- B  a  r  r  a  g  e

His name is awesome!! -- S i  g  m  A   12:41, 28 January 2007 (CST)


 * Ugly sigs, long code >< Entropy 12:43, 28 January 2007 (CST)


 * Coming from you, I'm not taking it personally :O -- B  a  r  r  a  g  e
 * NVM.

Sig Tests
Barrage. elites. User:Barrage/sig Barrage. User:Barrage/Characters Barrage.

Elite Skills Page
Hi, the template you are using is actually mine. If you don't mind, just leave your name here: User: Old Man Of Ascalon/Elites Thanks, --Old Man Of Ascalon   (T/C) 21:13, 28 January 2007 (CST)

Your signature
Please read the wiki signature policy. The use of the big tag is forbidden. Please change your signature. -- (talk) 07:14, 4 February 2007 (CST)
 * Mmm, shouldn't a signature clearly state one's name? Barrage.
 * Yes, but how does the big tag make it any clearer? It just makes talk pages look ugly with a lot of white space between lines. If you want to change the signature policy, you can start a discussion on the policy talk page. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 13:42, 4 February 2007 (CST)
 * I wasn't debating mine, I was debating yours. -- Barrage.
 * Ah. My sig icon is pretty intuitive, aint it? --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 13:52, 4 February 2007 (CST)
 * More or less. It looks like a small pink sheild at first glace. -- Barrage.
 * Hmm... sort of. The larger icon would be more intuitive, but would break the policy. :) --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 13:56, 4 February 2007 (CST)
 * I lose. :D -- Barrage.
 * Why does a male wants a pink colored shield? :| -- S i  g  m  A  [[image:Aura_of_Faith.jpg|19px|||My Talk]]
 * You need the timestamp on your sig. I'd say you haven't ticked the raw signatures box in your preferences. --Xasxas256 09:33, 11 February 2007 (CST)
 * Nope. -- Barrage.
 * Well you need to have it ticked. Also your sig should be substed . I noticed on your last comment it wasn't. It should look like   Could you please fix it? Thanks. --Xasxas256 16:13, 15 February 2007 (CST)
 * Sorry :x -- Barrage.

Ticked the boxes, took some time to find. :( -- Barrage. 16:34, 17 February 2007 (CST)
 * That font color is certainly not readable by colorblind and gives me a headache. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 20:11, 17 February 2007 (CST)
 * :D -- Barrage. 20:46, 17 February 2007 (CST)
 * The policy clearly states that the colors must be readable and non-disturbing. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2007 (CST)
 * gerg. -- Barrage.
 * I'm with Gem here. I may not be colorblind but I have sensitive vision. Your sig is hard for me to read and is glaringly bright on the white background. Putting a dark background around it for contrast might soften the effect somewhat but I dunno. As it is, the sig does break the policy because the sig is not easy to read and is "disturbing". (But at least it's not that damn rainbow one anymore ><) [[Image:Entrophic Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 03:27, 19 February 2007 (CST)

Heh, iWay
I've seen that picture around. My only problem is how you're supposed to use IWAY if your pet is alive. Doom Music 17:14, 5 February 2007 (CST)
 * iway.ytmnd.com --FireFox [[Image:firefoxav.gif]] 17:49, 5 February 2007 (CST)
 * rofl. :D -- Barrage.

Zomg ^^
Hehe...I love you. =o Regnor 18:26, 18 February 2007 (CST)