Talk:Game updates/20070622

This would be more readable if was copied from the website in place of the other wiki. ;-) §: TůζipVõrζąx Talk 19:49, 22 June 2007 (CDT)

lol. i was in the middle of abing when i updated. i was wondering why i got more faction. forgot the update lol. It wasn't up the site a few minutes ago when I checked. &mdash; ♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 19:51, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
 * There it is...&mdash; ♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 19:52, 22 June 2007 (CDT)

Aspenwood
Yes, they buffed Aspenwood! Wait, these changes will just mean more leechers... -_-;; Arshay Duskbrow 20:48, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Well the buffs only apply if you win. Leechers will mean pitiful team performance and hence get a very little bonus at all. Sirocco 21:08, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
 * The +600 is if you win, but the other two (Vengeance completion and Gate destruction) happen regardless of who wins. Arshay Duskbrow 21:48, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
 * But if you have a weak team or one with a lot of leechers, this will not amount to much faction at all. — RabiesTurtle (contribs) 22:11, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Aspenwood never amounted to much faction to begin with, this won't stop them. And many teams, assuming good coordination is present (rare, I know), usually win, even with a couple of leechers. --NYC Elite 22:14, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Expect the exact same number of leeches, but many more leavers. Playing with half a team for 15 minutes for 160 luxon faction isn't worth it. --24.179.151.252 22:35, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Yep, this will only boost leavers. Even without AFKers, as soon as a side begins to lose by a little bit, everyone is leaving: attempting a recovery is not worth the time/risk. 83.159.9.78 04:19, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

Bah, absolutely ridiculous. The leechers don't CARE how much faction they get, the whole point of it is that they get faction while they're not playing. Now it will take them longer to get the same amount of faction, but since they do it when they're not playing anyways, it doesn't matter to them. Afterall, you've ALWAYS gotten less from losing than winning, and they don't care. OTOH, those of us who actively play now have no reason to keep playing if it looks like we're not gonna win, cause the reward for losing simply isn't worth it. So as the guy above said, same leechers, but a lot more leavers. Great job Anet. DKS01 23:48, 22 June 2007 (CDT)

Jade Quarry
It's nice to see that more players are attempting to play this mission now that the faction has been boosted. Unfortunately not enough players on the Luxon's side seem to be joining. Kurzicks have also been winning a lot more games than luxons as well. If anyone who plays for the Luxons is reading this, please go to the Fort Aspenwood outpost and encourage players to Jade Quarry. We Kurzicks are getting bored waiting :P --SavageX 01:22, 23 June 2007 (CDT)


 * Luxons players don't care about Jade Quarry cause it's far easier to win at Aspenwood. In fact, many Luxon players think Quarry is "slanted" towards the Kurzick side since they don't win there nearly as often as they do at Aspenwood. That's the way it's always been, and unless they radically rebalance Aspenwood(or unbalance Quarry towards Luxons) that's how it's likely always going to be. Only way you'll get too many Luxons there is if you flat out award them faction on par with a win at Aspenwood just for showing up. DKS01 06:39, 23 June 2007 (CDT)