User talk:Entropy/templates/lame

Fyren, what exactly does the category do? ...and, why doesn't it actually include? Just curious. Entropy 04:16, 3 January 2007 (CST)
 * It was including, which is why I removed it. We don't need (talk) pages being put into random categories.  --Fyren 04:30, 3 January 2007 (CST)
 * Ah okay. However the category was still blank, the talk pages weren't actually included in the cat. I just assumed it was broken. For argumentative purposes, though, I wanted it to be a cat, so folks who love to argue for "trash skills" have a handy place to look. ;)
 * I understand why it's bad though, in terms of wiki maintenance; my apologies. Entropy 04:37, 3 January 2007 (CST)
 * I solved the problem myself, Fyren, I added a link to the "What Links Here..." specialpage into the templage. :) Entropy 04:52, 3 January 2007 (CST)
 * The talk pages were in the category before I changed your template. --Fyren 19:44, 3 January 2007 (CST)

A change
I propose another variable that can be used to change "sucks" to something along the lines of "is overpowered" for use on skills that are lame because they're way too strong --Gimmethegepgun 13:55, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
 * A good idea. This is why you're second-in-command. ;) [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 23:38, 4 May 2007 (CDT)

An opposite to this?
I was thinking something like "Unbelievably Bitchin' Even for a Roxxor UBER" for all those skills that we know and love (SS). Maybe someone else has another name for this template, I just got the idea from those guilds. Phalmatticus 18:57, 15 May 2007 (CDT)Phalmatticus