Talk:Effective mesmer guide

Status?
A quick check of the quick access links shows that Mesmer is the only profession missing an effective profession use guide (other than the Nightfall professions). But entering "Effective mesmer guide" popped up this work in process. It's not structured the same as the others; but hey, at least it's started! So ... is this page a draft of the article, or is it just something you created in your own space for your own use? If it's a draft, any eta on when you may feel it's ready for migration to the main article space? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:48, 25 August 2006 (CDT)
 * It's a draft I started after Sarah used Guilt on me (see my talk page). I don't feel it's quite ready for migration yet, I'll put some more work into it tonight, then I'd like for other frequent mesmer users to review/critic it a bit. --Theeth (talk)   18:59, 27 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I'm pretty much done for tonight, the only thing I feel is missing would be tie in for second professions. Right now, it's pretty much a pure breed guide (minus some pointers to the builds I've added). --Theeth (talk)   22:17, 27 August 2006 (CDT)

Fixes
I made quite a few spelling fixes for you mate but you need to decide if you're going to capitalise profession names or not. I believe that the standard is lowercase (i.e. mesmer) but my opinion is that as long as it's standardised accross the article, it's fine. Others may have conflicting/stronger opinions on the matter than me though. --Xasxas256 22:13, 27 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Thanks a lot for that. Spelling is not my forte (unless I'm really careful). If lowercase is the standard, then lets go for lowercase. --Theeth (talk)   22:17, 27 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Ok I did some more tidying, unfortunately I got an edit conflict so if I've overwritten some of your changes I apologise, I did a quick check and I think I'm alright. --Xasxas256 22:52, 27 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I had a quick look, everything seems alright. Thanks again, with your help and others, we might actually have something worth it I think. --Theeth (talk)   22:58, 27 August 2006 (CDT)