User talk:139.142.154.129

Please show proof regarding your edits to Kind Of A Big Deal. Also note that you broke the GW:1RV rule. Any further action such as this will result in administrative action. &mdash; Gares 10:29, 2 March 2007 (CST)

Oh just look at his contribs.. just another stupid rioter. Adding a ban flag... --Ineluki 10:36, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * I believe he was already blocked once for those contributions, no point in banning him yet if he doesn't do anything wrong. --Macros 10:39, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * According to the log, he was previously banned a week ago for those other actions (not the one today), so I deleted the request. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 10:41, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * Ah that's why I didn't find him in the log. But are those ridiculous edits in the maxes title track not considered vandalism? Or a bad joke? -.- --Ineluki [[Image:"Coward!".jpg|19px]] 10:47, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * GW:AGF means to assume his actions are well intentioned; but they were removed due to lack of verifiability at this time. If he or anyone else can provide a supporting screen shot, then the edits can be restored. However, re-inserting it without supporting evidence at this point would be a violation of GW:1RV. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 10:51, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * Regarding past bans for users, mainly IP addresses, do not take much stock into the past. I regularly search Wikipedia for information and on occasion notice my IP is banned. Dynamic IPs mean that it may not be the same person editting as it was in the past, thus the reason to give him a chance for this occurance. &mdash; Gares 10:56, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * So, Barek, since he edited (inserted) it twice, this would be reason enough I think. Gares, dynamic IP theory is known to me, however it gives me a certain satisfaction to see that IP banned. --Ineluki [[Image:"Coward!".jpg|19px]] 12:27, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * He was asked to provide evidence and warned about GW:1RV, and hasn't reinserted it since then. I see no need to ban at this point unless he does it again without evidence. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 12:32, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * I find it a bit disturbing that you would receive satisfaction in such a case. That definitely does not help your case to ban this individual. &mdash; Gares 12:55, 2 March 2007 (CST)