GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Marcopolo47


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Marcopolo47 (talk &bull; contribs)
This request has been archived, and should not be edited.

'''Marcopolo47 was made an admin on the 21 of november 2007. Congratulations Marco!'''

Yay for nominating myself? Anyways, I am a pretty long-time contributor to this wiki, and I always try to keep in the best shape that I can do. I am nearly constantly on, whether it's helping out new members of this wonderful society, or adding info to articles, or removing retarded trivia. I feel that I could do the job of an administrator well, and can cover for the times that other admins are not on, especially during a vandalism attack, such as earlier today. Peace and love> (Talk) (Contr.) 21:09, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
 * Seeing as how I nominated myself, I accept.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 21:10, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) --Chris1645 21:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) huuuge support, altough he is only 14 (am I correct?) he is well advanced in wiki coding etcetera. And as there are not much admins here I think we would definatly need a well experienced administrator. [[Image:ShadyGuy.jpg]] 21:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Strong support X Deity X  [[Image:xdeityx.png]] 21:20, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Pfft.. marco's trying for Adminship? FINE, I'll try for it.. xD.. Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 21:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Who would vote for me if i req'd admin?
 * Everyone: No-one..
 * Me: =[ Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 21:45, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) the description he gave is correct, 'cept for the fact he was NOT at the vandal attack ;) Support --[[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]] -- (s)talkpage 21:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) You got my support. Gwiki definetely needs moar more admins, and seeing how much you are online and how quick you can thus respond to vandalism you would be a good choice. --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] -- talkpage 22:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Strong Wikiskills, experienced with multiple areas of the wiki, constant vandal-fighter...same bias as with Gimmethegepgun's RfA, but in all honesty he's a decent candidate for the job also. I doubt he'd abuse his admin powers in Trivia-related matters, also. :P [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 23:33, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Must...destroy...trivia...section...--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 23:34, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) I believe him and gimme are very decent and solid people as well as workers, they both appear(can't comfirm = D) to care for the wiki very sincerely, with occasional humor involved(not that's a bad thing....). Flechette 23:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Yeah, he jokes around, but he can be serious when needed, and is good at handling vandals. Besides, many trivia sections need a good prwning --Gimmethegepgun 23:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jokes and spams talkpages a lot, but he'd be a good admin. Lord Belar 00:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ok Cress Arvein 01:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Ereanorsign.jpg]]reanor 03:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Support, thought i'd already voted, good choice. RT | Talk 11:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Support, great editer. On wiki way to much for his own health. To bad he might die of malnourishment because he edits to much of something if he gets adminship, but i doubt it. DrJeff 01:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Support, no vandal and I think he will be a great admin--Fighterbitsj 16:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Kills vandals dead. Well, kinda. But not really. But still. Yeaaaaaaah... Good admin-type person! [[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png]]  Entrea Sumatae 04:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) The wiki needs another admin, and he seems like a wonderful person for the job. Even comes with a sense of humor! Shadowcrest 07:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) I don't find admin-anship as a big deal, so I see no harm in letting you be one. Don't feel the burden of responsibility as a deterer from logging on though, have had that happen to a couple of mates of mine before. Zulu Inuoe 08:36, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) (your vote here)

Neutral

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.