File talk:Gray X.png

Is this supposed to be nearly invisible? --Macros 12:18, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. For visible, use [[Image:Nope.png]], [[Image:NA-icon-small.png]] or . Check out Artisan list for its use; does that table look bad to you?
 * This gray is darker than the gray shown on the license header backgrounds. Check User:M.mendel/Colors; the gray is between 3 and 4 on the lowest grayscale bar. Adjust your screen if the bars don't show up well for you. -- ◄mendel► 12:35, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * On the artisan list, I didn't even realize there were things in those boxes, I thought they were empty. If you use an empty box, will that mess up the spacing? That's the only reason I can think of for using a nearly invisible image. I think it looks ok on the artisan page, but please don't change the Weapon upgrade page do do the same - the boxes are different widths and having an empty (or nearly empty) space would make it hard to tell which one IS empty, plus the green checks outnumber the red checks by a lot. --Macros 12:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


 * They stand out enough for me, however, I like the red X's much, much more for the Artisan list; it looks bad atm, with the (in comparision) INYOURFACE-green-ticks and the barely visible gray X's. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]] -- (contribs) &emsp;(talk)  13:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The gray X's are not important, that's why they need to be less visible. I think they could be a bit darker though. ✘ ✘ ✘ [[Image:Gray X.png]] ✘ ✘ --mendel 212.6.123.204 14:32, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 * On the Weapon Upgrade page, the X's need to stand out, so it's ok for them to be red. We could use icons for the column headers though (do we have the inventory icons for these objects?) and "equalize" the column widths, that would certainly make that table look better. --212.6.123.204 14:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)