File talk:Sydney Harbour.JPG

You know, I kind of expected Sydney Harbour to look different. Ezekiel  [Talk]  07:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Interestingly, you didn't tag it. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 07:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Armour images are easy, if they've been replaced I tag the old ones, if they're current I tag with screenshot. User images I tend not to touch, It's faster to just hit a bunch of armour images than to check if the user is active. Ezekiel  [Talk]  07:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Well someone's got to do it. However, that someone won't be me, because I'm going to bed. Goodnight. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 07:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * "It's faster to just hit a bunch of armour images than to check if the user is active." Eh, trying to get your editcount up? --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 07:57, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Just being efficient :P if I can tag 20 armor images in the same time it takes to do 5 user pictures then I'm making better use of my procrastination. Ezekiel  [Talk]  08:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Tagging 20 armor pages or 5 user pictures both helps a lot. We're trying to get every image tagged anyway. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 08:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Does this image really drain on the website's bandwith? Not to be sarcastic, because I really would like to know. -Wang 03:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * In of itself, probably not. But there are thousands of user images that need to be sorted, either with tags, licensing or deletion (because they reuploaded under a different name, never got around to linking it, whatever the reason) this one just happens to be on one I've come across a few times in Special:UnusedImages and if it's not going to be used it might as well be deleted. Unless you have some plan with it. Ezekiel  [Talk]  04:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)