User talk:Rapta/Archive 4

Build Page
Bwaha. Your page is a bit out of date, eh? Still Luxon, I see :p -Auron  01:09, 7 December 2006 (CST)

Changed build
Hey, i thought i would let you know that my build has been changed alot since the last time you voted. Could you revote? thanx BMW 23:23, 6 December 2006 (CST)

I don't think you understood how Build:W/any Enduring Axe (renamed) works, could you try it and revote? (look in the talk page) Tycn 19:43, 9 December 2006 (CST)

Hey you voted my build unfavored, without taking the time to see that the degen skills are not meant to be used on one target, as I know that degen maxes at 10 pips, it is used to provide maximum degen to two seperate targets, as well as a deep wound+snare --Getalifebud 18:43, 10 December 2006 (CST)

I don't think you tested my build at all and thought it was crap. Well you know what next time test it don't effin put on unfavoured because you don't get how it works. Build:D/A Vish Sin --Hellbringer 19:57, 18 December 2006
 * I never voted, mister. It was 4 against, so it was moved to unfavored. Simple as that. &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 19:58, 18 December 2006 (CST)
 * Well I changed it around and they never tested and I'm sorry for what I said, it's just that all my builds have very hard concepts to them because mine are way trickier than other peoples, but once you play it for a little while you will get the hang of most my builds. I had a very tough time just starting my build.Hellbringer 20:08, 18 December 2006 (CST)
 * Well I wouldn't go to such ways to try and get a build recovered. Either way, the community has spoken, it's unfavored. The policy is that unless a major change is made, it's going to stay unfavored. Feel free to move it to your namespace though. &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 20:06, 18 December 2006 (CST)
 * Exchanged a 15 cast spell that people hate for a signet. Happy? (Me/A Promising Dominatrix) NightAngel 10:33, 20 December 2006 (CST)

Stance Tank
Thanks and it looks good but for one thing: Someone is going to notice the majority of negative votes from the previous version and wonder why it was vetted. Are you still working on the move or is it finished?--  Vallen Frostweaver  16:18, 13 December 2006 (CST)
 * Right, my mistake. I forgot to move the talk page. Thanks for catching that. =) &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 16:22, 13 December 2006 (CST)

Searing Steam
More information as to why Searing Steam is less effective would be greatly appreciated. For example, I find the main Searing Flames build less effective because I generally feel Liquid Flame is a wasted skill slot and Meteor Shower is to easily wasted. My build, on the other hand, offers users the ability to negate some of their more dangerous foes: warriors and rangers, both of which can cause a great deal of damage and cause devistating interupts, through the use of steam or blurred vision depending on the variation taken and the situation presented. Cibi 23:00, 13 December 2006 (CST)

Mo/any Canthan Bonder
Just curious why the Tested->Untested move in. Doesn't 3 up votes mean it's in? (Note, I have no dogs in any fights around this, I'm just curious). -- Oblio (talk) 18:45, 17 December 2006 (CST)
 * It's 3 to 1. &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 19:52, 17 December 2006 (CST)

Build:E/Me Degen Nuker
Hullo! Thanks for test driving the above. I've found that Aura of Restoration normally covers the loss from Ether Prodigy when I use it but I agree there isn't much defence there though especialy depending on what optional you're pack. Any thoughts on what could imporove that side of it? --JP 07:15, 19 December 2006 (CST)

N/any IV Transfusion
Hey Rapta, there seems to be some confusion regarding the status of this. You recently reverted a change by Sefre, but maybe did not see his explanation on the talk page. Could you drop by there, review the discussion and help clear things up? Thanks! -- BrianG 22:02, 19 December 2006 (CST)

Silly Rapta
Trick's are for Kids... &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Midnight08 (contribs) 01:33, 20 December 2006.