Talk:Forgotten

Strictly speaking, the name of this article should be "Forgotten One" (singular) --Tetris L 02:16, 8 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * Na, "ones" is used like "individuals" Skuld &Dagger; 02:32, 8 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * Yes, but this is the article about the species Forgotten Ones. And all our other species articles are in singular (for example it's Skale, not Skales). Only categories are plural. And using the singular form sounds perfectly okay to me: "Vassa Ssiss is a Forgotten One" Nothing wrong with that. --Tetris L 03:15, 8 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * I agree with Tetris L here. This should be Forgotten One.  --Rainith 03:17, 8 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * Also, I just noticed that the category is called Forgotten, not Forgoten Ones. Another inconsistency that we might want to fix. --Tetris L 03:27, 8 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * How about we call the species "Forgotten" and categorize it under Bestiary. The species article Forgotten would then focus on the species, like any other species article: What they look like, how they behave in combat, their professions and skills, where they can be found, etc. The article The Forgotten Ones would focus on the historic role of the Serpents. It would file under Lore. The two would be linked. --Tetris L 03:29, 8 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * I like that idea. --Rainith 03:37, 8 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * I will go ahead and do it later tonight (unless somebody objects or beats me to it in the meantime). Do we already have a screenshot of the big Serpent mural? I've always wanted to add that to the Forgotten Ones article. --Tetris L 03:46, 8 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * I agree with the move to Forgotten and I'll do it now, but I adisagree with separating the article about them into two articles. Why is that? Please explain here before setting a precedent. I see them just like the Mursaat. There is a basic description of what they are in the game, and then a bigger exposition of what they are in the story. Same thing for these guys. --Karlos 14:30, 8 Oct 2005 (EST)