Talk:Warrior Monument armor

THANK YOU ANET
4 new armor sets per profession, each one made of older models reskinned with ugly textures. What a freaking waste.

Can someone please post a photo of a warrior wearing:

Helmet: Elite Templar armor Body: Elite Sunspear armor Hands:Primeval armor Bottoms: Luxon armor Feet: Luxon armor''

So we can get a comparison?

Lame
primeval/kurzick/templar armor ftw

This page is courtesy of Lady Raenef. Your welcome, everybody. ;)

Mabye Primeval and Templar. I don't see how it's anything like kurzick. The pants are actually taken from 1k luxon armor and redone. --Lann 23:55, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

The Kurzick is the body piece, also used in elite sunspear. --58.167.233.48 05:37, 2 September 2007 (CDT)


 * Hideous. Absolutely hideous. There's no cohesive aethetic, just a jumble of parts. Seriously disappointed. Sirocco 07:08, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * agreed its ugly, very ugly Viruzzz 07:14, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Might be some use for it, since the gloves actually look alot like the Primeval ones, so if these don't clip through shields I might as well replace my Primeval ones with these. The main question now is wether these clip or not...

It seems just a bit extraneous, not to mention, it sounds like you're trying to bais people against this armor. Even if it does look horrible, with "No cohesive aethetic", let the reader decide that. Don't try to tell people "It's just a lame remake", I don't see this list on any of the other pages, anyway. Think it's safe to get rid of it?Enigma Syndrome 09:30, 2 September 2007 (CDT) I agree, even tho its fucking hideous and a waste of money, if I spent 60k on what I thought was a unique armor and found of its a lame re-skin i'd be pissed , but the armor pages have to be uniform right?Cardsharp 09:36, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

We can express our opinion and we need to share information about this armor, that's what this site is about! Now, for my opinion about this armor; BAAAHHHH!! That's what we get for buying the expenssion? An unrelated pieces of remaade armors?! WTF?!?!

I, myself, Lady Raenef added that armor reference. Yes, it is necessary, since it's basically history about the armor.

not needed, anyone who is looking at armours on wiki will know anyway..and it just is not important. will remove as it is general consensus here, ignore my spelling! &mdash; ~ Soqed Hozi ~  15:10, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * It's not as bad for the women as it is for the men, once again. The guys almost always seem to get the raw deal in armor sets. However, this just sucks. 69.131.150.215 17:17, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * I like the armor, personally. I think it looks terrible white, though. 76.211.81.234 02:01, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

I like it 0_o
 * I stand by what I said, this is proof that Anet designers are on crack , this shit is hideous Cardsharp 04:04, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Is the last bit of the trivia really necessary? Didn't we decide that it didn't belong? Enigma Syndrome 08:17, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

when its dyed it looks ALOT better