GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Dr ishmael

Dr ishmael (talk &bull; contribs &bull; Edit Count)
Very active as of recently, many (many) helpful edits to the wiki, good personality for an admin, appears to be familiar with wikicoding, nearly completed the entire concise descriptions on his lonesome. ìğá†ħŕášħ Talk 03:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support
(your vote here)
 * 1) He's been helping a lot Lost-Blue  03:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Contributes solely to the wiki based on personal whim and boredom rather than a strong commitment to its maintenance and advancement (other than completing incomplete data). Is only sporadically active and thus additional sysop tools would not add much. Very well versed in wikicode, level-headed, many edits to mainspace, etc. But I feel that what Dr ishmael does best in his contributions - namely, creating comprehensive tables and killing redlinks - can be done just as well without sysop tools. Therefore I am disinclined to promote. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 06:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) (Didn't know we could vote before he accepted) But yeah, I'm pretty much dittoing what Entropy said, I think that his numerous contributions (however appreciated they may be) are simply a result of wiki-ogre-ism. Unfortunately, I feel that this activity will eventually die down, but maybe time will prove differently. No, not quite worth adminship, but if the edits remain consistent, then yes. --Powersurge360 06:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) (your vote here)