Talk:Soul Reaping/Archive

"There are currently no skills that use Soul Reaping; any weapon or armor mods that involve Soul Reaping casting cost or recharge will have no real effect." With the release of factions, this is no longer true. Some new skills are linked to soul reaping. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.178.226.36 (contribs) 09:56, 25 March 2006.

Factions Soul Reaping
Because of the fact that Soul Reaping gained skills and the fact that there is alot of Binding Ritual use in Factions (As seen in Preview event) that it should be noted it's consitered slightly more 'useful' in the Factions Campain.
 * How does it differ from the fact that Prophecies have Nature Rituals? In any case, the usefulness of this attribute is not related to "Associated Skills". -PanSola 06:47, 18 April 2006 (CDT)
 * Nature rituals aren't constantly spammed like many Ritualist ones are. Ritualist have many rituals which die after a short amount of time due to taking damage for use.  And Ritualist have many skills which speed up the recharge of rituals allowing them to create them more often. And there are many skills now that end rituals pre-maturely which can yield in more beneficial energy and healing.  All of these reasons are besides the fact that Rangers got more rituals aswell. | Chuiu 07:48, 18 April 2006 (CDT)

one quick question...does soul reaping round up at 11 soul reaping, or round down...i.e., do you get 6 or 5 energy?
 * Down. Updated the article.  --68.142.14.19 03:28, 22 July 2006 (CDT)

Revert
I challenge that the older edit has better "grammer [sic] and flow." The original first sentence contains a comma splice. The second is outright awkward by starting with "for soul reaping it does not matter..." because the article is discussing only SR and not contrasting SR with anything else. Even if it were, it would be missing a comma. The phrase "allied to you or an enemy" is also clumsy since it carries an implication of "you" and your "enemy" being singular. Aside from fixing these issues, my edit added additional information and removed the "recent patch" reference. --68.142.14.19 04:23, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Lacking input, re-reverting tomorrow. --68.142.14.19 23:46, 22 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Alright, the Nazi is here. What's the issue at hand? GrammarNazi 22:33, 6 March 2007 (CST)
 * (looks at the date, hangs head in shame)...ignore that.GrammarNazi 22:35, 6 March 2007 (CST)