GuildWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Warwick (2)

Votes
This is getting a bit out of hand. You are taking people you know and asking them to vote for you, even if they have NO CLUE about the wiki/your contributions/everything. I'm very aware that bureaucrats can think by themselves and they probably won't consider such votes, but nonetheless you should stop right now. --Mr Ex Vandal 20:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Its perfectly fine. --[[Image:Feardrake Sig.jpg|19px]] Feardrake. 20:22, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'd have to agree with Mr. Ex on this one. They really don't have a clue about what warwick is like on the wiki. However, the votes have already been removed, so.. -- Shadow crest   20:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * To Feardrake: No, it's not. I could call all my friends, have them register accounts and get 100 votes, but that wouldn't make me a good sysop. It's about knowing the situation and being able to judge. If you don't, there is Neutral. --Mr Ex Vandal 20:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

And they were put back in. Mr Ex is right in saying Bcrats probably won't consider those votes, but they still shouldn't be there. -- Shadow crest   20:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, my mistake. /phail, I didn't see they were struck out. -- Shadow crest   20:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ex, now i understands, tyvm /notsarcasm --[[Image:Feardrake Sig.jpg|19px]] Feardrake. 20:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)