GuildWiki talk:Task List

Can we replace the link to the (rarely used) Current events with one to the Task list in the navigation bar on the left? --Xeeron 09:27, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Currentevents-url is the page - change to Task List

and MediaWiki:Currentevents that is the text that shows in the sidebar - change to Task list 83.67.39.175 11:45, 3 December 2005 (UTC) btw thats me.. i keep forgetting to log in

*bump* 07:05, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

Quest Ending Text
Will we ever want to add what the NPC says at the end of a quest? It is a spoiler of sorts, but I feel if we add it past how to beat the quest (also a spoiler) it will be fine. Reason I would like it eventually added is because there can be lots of juicy story bits there. --Ravious 09:07, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Start up a thread in GuildWiki talk:Style and formatting/Quests, this is where any discussion should be started. --Rainith 12:00, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks Rainith, thread started there. --Ravious 09:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Help Images
Being a huge fan of this Wiki, I feel like I really would like to contribute something. What I have in mind would be a simple page of Armour Images for each profession. Similar to what could once (but no longer can) be found on GuildWars Guru, Armour Compendium. However this all seems terribly complicated to me now, I am left wondering if this would be something worth pursuing, and if it would be a worthy contribution, and how I might go about doing this. Any comments or help would be appreciated and please forgive my ignorance in these matters. --Saint Justice 13:25, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Older tasks on top?
Some of the "old" tasks I fear might not be getting enough attention because all the new ones are stacking on top of them.

If we always put old tasks on top (except special super important ones, which go on top top), that might help move things along. Thoughts? -PanSola 01:10, 25 February 2006 (CST)

Acquisitions: Signet of Capture
There are a LOT of normal skills that can be captured in various places rather than purchased from trainers. However, it's the harder way to do this. On the other hand, in many cases it allows you to use a skill before you get to a place you can quest for/purchase it. If GuildWiki is still interested in doing so, I would like to work on fleshing out the Signet of Capture acquisitions for normal skills (crossreferencing from the bosses). I do not wish to start, though, if this would seem to be a waste of time. -Evil_Greven 10:50, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * If you do this, note that it has been decided not to list bosses who appear after you can get the skill from a quest/trainer in the skill capture sections. i.e. there is no need to list the bosses that you can capture Healing Signet from.  Or any skill that can be gotten from a quest/trainier before the player reaches Lion's Arch.  --Rainith 10:59, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * Sounds good. Do I assume correctly that after refers to the storyline, then (ignoring the routes from ToA to Sanctum Cay & Beacon's Perch to Southern Shiverpeaks)? -Evil_Greven 11:17, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * Kind of. South Kryta vs Maguuma is tricky.  I'd say for the purpose of skill cap organization, consider south kryta as being the same "region" as Maguuma.  It's possible for ppl to run into bosses and cap things from Twin Serpent Lakes before going into the jungle.  Also, you might want to check out Bestiary/RawDump btw.  Related discussion at Talk:Bestiary. -PanSola 13:28, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * Should we remove existing Signets of Capture acquisitions that are after Quest/Trainer is available in the storyline (ie: Counter Blow), then? Or just leave them be? -Evil_Greven 11:12, 4 March 2006
 * Remove them, although I do occasionally have the urge to turn Healing Signet into the biggest article on the wiki by putting all the bosses that have it in the article. :P  --Rainith 11:18, 4 March 2006 (CST)

Standard article order?
Is there a standardized order for information? For instance, most skills seem to follow this general order: Name, Contents (usually), Description, Usage, Acquisition, Related Skills (if any listed). However, Usage and Acquisition seem to often be switched, and occasionally the Progression is swapped somewhere else (a side question, which progression table is the preferred? one is much larger than the other, but more visually appealing). Is there really a standard? If not, should there be? - Evil_Greven 13:30, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * Answered my own question. GuildWiki talk:Style & Formatting/Skills/Everything Example. Although, the discussion on that is kind of iffy to what I desire to do... if permissible, might I begin restructuring the detailed skill articles as to follow the example above? - Evil_Greven 13:43, 28 February 2006 (CST)