Talk:Miniature Gray Giant

Pre-event weekend comments
Note: For all other mini-pets, we do not have individual articles for each one. I suspect the Grey Giant will be a new monster added to the Beastiary following the release of Nightfall. To me, links to it should remain red until we have images or some sort of actual data to include. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:41, 10 September 2006 (CDT)

I have the PC Gamer issue (no. 153) in my possession. On page 115 is the following: ''It's almost tempting not to tell you about our November issue, just to make you squirm a little it's going to be so bery juicy and delicious. Mmm, anyone hungry...for details on the next Guild Wars game? For the exclusive Guild Wars mini pet you can only get from us.'' Along with this is a picture of the Grey Giant, a mummy wearing what looks to be bronze armor. Half it's face is an armored mask, while the other half is a mummified skeleton with a huge tusk.--&mdash; xis10al   14:00, 10 September 2006 (CDT)


 * I have the same issue Xis10al, but I agree w/Barek. Also the picture in the magazine is of concept art, not an ingame image, so the actual render may be somewhat different from that.  --Rainith 22:51, 10 September 2006 (CDT)

Image of miniature
The picture in use, where did it originate? Is it in a press release, the GW gallery (can't access from work), or a magazine's website? Please specify source of pre-release images, due to copyright concerns. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:42, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Left a message on Phoenix's talk page asking him to comment here about it. --Rainith 16:08, 13 September 2006 (CDT)

Gray
Moved to Grey, unless this is it's actual name, anyone have a link? &mdash; Skuld 14:48, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * The US spelling of the color is Gray. I would expect ArenaNet to likely use the US spelling as thats what they've done with other names.  Still, many Americans are sloppy and use both interchangeably, so who knows what we'll actually see once its released. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:52, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Huh, and i'm clueless lol. &mdash; Skuld 14:56, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Gray and Grey are both used to spell the color's name. It's like armor and armour or center and centre. As Barek stated, the spelling Gray is more American, as you can see the differences in Gray and Grey. The correct spelling should have been in the PC Gamer (no. 153) preview for the November edition, since it states the name. Maybe since Rainith has issue 153, he can shed some light on the name. -Gares 15:47, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * I'll check when I get home, 90% sure it was spelled "Grey" in the mag. --Rainith 16:06, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * You also spelt "color" american style :) &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.89.209.197 (talk &bull; contribs) 15:54, September 13, 2006 (CDT).
 * Oficially is Gray Giant. So please revert back.--Phoenix [[Image:Phoenix_Benu.png]] 19:19, 13 September 2006 (CDT)

Source
It comes from the official EU Guild Wars news: http://eu.guildwars.com/ Gray Giant Magazine Offer. Gues i am the only one who checks that site now and then :).--Phoenix 19:09, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Thanks for the info, so it looks like based on that and the previous thing from PC Gamer that will be the one to look out for --Lemming64 19:28, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Phoenix, please see Image use policy, just because an image is posted on Guild Wars' web site, that does not give us permission to use it here. In fact they specifically ask that you do not do that w/o written permission.  That is why the image was deleted.  Sorry.  :(  --Rainith 13:58, 14 September 2006 (CDT)

Delete
As the image was really the only thing in this article, and it was removed per GW:IMAGE, I'm adding the delete tag. Red links are not evil, they help flag items where content is needed once we can get in-game images; red links are better than empty articles. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 09:45, 15 September 2006 (CDT)

Tradeable
I heard that the minipet is not tradeable during the preview event. &mdash; kyrasantae   14:24, 24 September 2006 (CDT)

stealing
Do you you think it should be noted that page 96 has no protection (such as a scratch-off film) and thus the keys can be easily copied and stolen? i know some peole that have done that, which is why I plan on taking one from the middle of the magazine stack. I think itis the job of any wiki to inform people of such things.
 * PC Gamer Magazine comes wrapped. So if you come across an unwrapped one, don't purchase it.--&mdash;  xis10al  [[Image:Xis10al_sig_icon.jpg]] 06:55, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Non-DVD editions don't. I've seen them in store. &mdash; [[Image:Fin_sig.gif]] kyrasantae  &#91;t |c &#93;  11:53, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
 * This issue is a DVD edition.--&mdash; xis10al  [[Image:Xis10al_sig_icon.jpg]] 15:47, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
 * *Shrug* I've seen every issue in both flavors. &mdash; [[Image:Fin_sig.gif]] kyrasantae  &#91;t |c &#93;  17:34, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Yep it definetly comes in both types of issue, both have codes in. So if you are going to buy one I would recomend buying the DVD version to avoid the possibility that the code has been stolen, the other option is to input it as soon as you get home, if it doesn't work take it back to the store and complain. --Lemming64 17:46, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Just as a note, I picked up the non-DVD version, it was the last one left of either version, and had obviously been read thru in the store(Barnes and Nobel) and had no problems. :)  --Rainith 20:16, 27 September 2006 (CDT)