Talk:Tombs

Time to change the redirect?
I think the time has matured to change Tombs to redirect to Ruins of the Tomb of the Primeval Kings. Or at least turn it into disambiguation between the Ruins and HA. Most ppl searching for "Tombs" nowadays are probably looking for the Ruins of the Tomb of the Primeval Kings me thinks. Comments?- 01:32, 26 May 2006 (CDT)
 * I say redirect & add a header to Ruins of the Tomb of the Primeval Kings: "Tombs" redirects here. For the PvP area, see Hero's Ascent (Mission)., since the major usage for Tombs is definitely the PvE area, but some people probably still call HA "tombs" (edit: this will save the majority of users an additional click). I suggest that the header can be eventually phased out, though, but who knows when "eventually" is. There. Wordy, but you get all my reasons! --Tinarto [[Image:Tinarto-gold-Monk-icon-small.png]] 02:08, 26 May 2006 (CDT)
 * I agree with Tinarto - the name says it all. Tombs has been called tombs, and HA called HA long enough for this wiki to point to the correct article instead of the wrong one. :P [[Image:Biscuit.png]]Biscuits 07:22, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
 * I'd say disambiguation. If you say "tombs" to a PvEer, I'm sure they'd think the ruins.  But even now, if I say "tombs" to the PvPers I know, they'd think HA.  --68.142.14.9 09:44, 26 May 2006 (CDT)
 * I think the more relavent question is, will PvP players be searching using the keyword "Tombs" or "HA" when they use guild wiki. - 12:22, 26 May 2006 (CDT)
 * I think it is fine the way it is now. --Nilles 12:48, 26 May 2006 (CDT)
 * The people who search for "tombs" are likely to be people who don't know what it means at all. That's why I'd say a disambiguation page would be better.  Personally, I still say "tombs/tombing" and never "HA," but my observation is that not enough people use it to mean just either HA or the ruins to justify a redirect to HA.  --68.142.14.9 14:31, 26 May 2006 (CDT)