Template talk:Protected

aaahh... It looks so much better when it is actually a copy in it's own template rather than in the copy of it's copied template. --Jamie  09:38, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
 * I forgot ok :p &mdash; Skuld  09:39, 6 July 2006 (CDT)

Template needed?
Is this tag needed? The text at the top of the article seems over-intrusive.

We already have Category:Protected pages for pages that are protected against any edits; maybe a category for pages with a restrictive protection would be adequate? (not sure the best name of such a category though). At the very least, I think this tag needs to be stream-lined to be less intrusive. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 09:41, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Thanks for cleaning it up; the tag is much less "in your face" in its revised form. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:36, 6 July 2006 (CDT)