Category talk:Hidden objects

Delete tag
I disagree with the reason "incomplete, (another list) is much better" as sufficient for deleting this category. If a category is incomplete, the issue can be fixed as simply as completing the category. Having a list article should not, IMHO, prevent the existence of a category. All in all I think "Hidden objects" sounds like a natural category to have in order to characterize a number of articles. -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 00:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * As stated by the description, the original purpose of this category was for objects in EotN dungeons revealed by the Light of Deldrimor skill. In which case, the only missing article is Secret Switch, which I just added.  If you think we should expand the scope of this category, that's fine, but what else should we include?  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 01:37, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I do not advocate for expanding the scope of the category. -User:PanSola (talk to the [[Image:follower of Lyssa.png]]) 02:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The category is much too specific. It doesn't place the objects in any kind of context. The hidden treasure is already well catted in chests. NPCs that you can discover to help you don't usually have their own category, they're just listed as NPCs in the quest or location. In Category:Objects there are quite a few pages listed that describe objects similar to the Secret Switch, e.g. Lever. These are immovable, inanimate objects that you can use. (Animate objects usually rotate towards you when you "talk" to them.) I suggest thinking up a category name for them, moving this category there, and cleaning up Category:Objects. Would "Category:Fixtures" be a good name? "Chests" would then become a subcategory of that, and "Category:Environment" would have to be reexamined. --◄mendel► 06:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Anyone?
Anyone disagree with the deletion? It's been up for 3 weeks --Gimmethegepgun 19:40, 15 October 2008 (UTC)