GuildWiki talk:Style and formatting/Unique items

Might want to leave a link to copy and paste for the image &mdash; Skuld   23:23, 3 June 2006 (CDT)

Images aligned right
According to this style guide, Images are supposed to appear before anything else, but if you look at practically any unique item, they are all aligned right. Should the style guide be upgraded to make images aligned right, or should all unique items' pages be upgraded to fit the style guide? &mdash; Galil  17:32, 21 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Thumbnails are automatically floated right. 85.31.186.86 17:39, 21 June 2006 (CDT)


 * My mistake, thought that only happened if you explicitly specified |right| in the image link. ^^ &mdash; Galil  17:54, 21 June 2006 (CDT)

Plenty of bot work

 * Collector Weapon Counterparts -> Collector weapon counterparts
 * Weapon Stats -> Weapon stats

For reference see GW:ULC &mdash; Skuld  11:17, 9 July 2006 (CDT)

Image of stats
Several months back, a decision had been reached to not include images of weapon stats. I hadn't followed this S&F entry closely, but just noticed now that neither the image nor the stats sections mention to not use images of the stats in the unique item articles (or point out where it says it if I'm blind and missed it). Before I changed the article, I wanted to ask if I missed a conversation about changing back to again allow stat images - and if so, should they be part of the weapon image or a seperate image. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 12:21, 17 October 2006 (CDT)
 * AFAIK you didn't miss a conversation, the info was just never added to this page. Go for it.  :)  --Rainith 17:26, 17 October 2006 (CDT)

Sundering
Shouldn't sundering mods be listed as "Armor penetration +20% (Chance: 20%)" instead of without the "+"?-- Kirbman 14:45, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Change
Oops, I was looking through the history and edited the wrong revision.. ;( &mdash; Skuld 10:19, 1 December 2006 (CST)

drop place
seeing as how nearly every green article now has the "dropped by BLANK in BLANK." format, i think it would be pertinent to update this guide as such. anyone disagree? &mdash; 12:02, 16 January 2007 (CST)

collector/weaponsmith counterparts
we should also have a uniform method of dealing with multiple counterparts, as every unique item that can have a collector/weaponsmith counterpart has several. and if we dont want to list every single possible permutation, we should have a method of choosing a favored one. &mdash; 12:08, 16 January 2007 (CST)

i propose something like: ==Collector / Weaponsmith counterpart== This weapon's stats can be fully duplicated with:

Base weapon

 * Collector:
 * The Long Sword from Uderit Ignis
 * The Dadao Sword from Attendant Nashu
 * The Dadao Sword from Dye Master Franjek
 * The Machete from Pobehr
 * Weaponsmith:
 * The Katana from Nago
 * The Machete from Grif Ebonmane
 * The Machete from Kehjim
 * The Machete from Wisseh
 * The non-inscribed Machete from Bolereh, Hadusi, Rahmdah, Sende, Shausha, or Tehshan
 * A perfect "Guided by Fate" inscription

Upgrades

 * A perfect Sundering Sword Hilt
 * A perfect Sword Pommel of Fortitude &mdash;[[Image:Damnreds.png]] 12:45, 16 January 2007 (CST)
 * I think we should split the inscribed weapon or make it with defferent bullet points then the rest.&mdash; ├ A ratak ┤  13:15, 16 January 2007 (CST)