GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Skuld (2)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Skuld (talk &bull; contribs)
Skuld is the best, everyone knows it. I think skuld is the best, readmin him please. Oh, btw, this is a quality nomination ^.^ &mdash;Blastedt 19:58, 19 March 2007 (CDT)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Decline &mdash; Skuld 03:23, 26 March 2007 (CDT)
 * what? Why? &mdash;[[Image:BlastThatT.jpg]]Blastedt 15:01, 26 March 2007 (CDT)

Support

 * 1) I always liked Skuld. I think he should be an admin once again. --Lania Elderfire[[Image:Pinkribbonsig.gif|My Talk]] 20:41, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) &mdash;Cheese Slaya 20:06, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
 * [[image:rollerzerris.jpg|50x19px]]   20:10, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
 * This nomination has turned into a joke, I refuse to be a part of it. --[[image:rollerzerris.jpg|50x19px]]   21:51, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) Jeez, u pplz r crazy! Skuld rocks my kurzick socks! i beat he could beat Abaddon, Rurik, and Shiro in a game of go-fish! GO SKULD!--Kurzspear '' 21:04, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Meh, my monk could beat rurik in a swordfight Not a fifty five 22:51, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) I don't like how he thinks or what he does, and he put me up for banning once, and yet I can't really see a problem in his administratorship. This isn't a popularity contest ("so and so rocks or sucks" comments are extremely childish), this is a vote on his capability to use and not abuse his power, and at that I never saw much danger. I DO wish he'd stay away from the build section. NightAngel 08:16, 22 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) WE NEED OUR BAD COP! ;-) - [[Image:Candle.jpg|12px]] Krowman (talk • contribs) 22:06, 22 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 3) -Auron [[Image:Elit Druin.jpg|19px||My Talk]] 01:15, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 4) Oh come on, Build erm...Guild Wiki isn't as entertaining without him. --24.17.236.162 16:38, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 5) I know the nom counts as a vote, but I have to vote again. &mdash;[[Image:BlastThatT.jpg]]Blastedt 16:42, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 6) --FireFox  [[Image:firefoxav.gif]] 16:01, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 7) I disagree with comments that his supposed sarcasm or "blunt people skills" will stop him from being a proper admin. From what I can see, it's relatively minor, and I haven't really seen an acute form of this lately. Eh, all admin can be a bit curt towards really thick offenders anyway. Also, doesn't the fact that we end up purging the build section now kind of prove that his policy while he was still admin was the correct course? So we demote him and then do what he's been trying to do all along... great. Besides, since this is decided by the admins anyway, look at some of those who are saying no... -Silk Weaker 22:06, 25 March 2007 (CDT)

Oppose
]] 12:34, 21 March 2007 (CDT) ]] 06:42, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) I do not favor Skuld's adminship Craw   20:17, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) I don't see why he has to become a Moderator again, he blew it the last time. I fail to see how he has improved his behaviour.  Solus  [[image:Shield_of_Judgment.jpg|19px]] 23:42, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 3) He's improved his attitude and behavior a great deal, and continues with good contributions, but I don't think it's been long enough to merit readmin. And I'd like to see how he participates in the upcoming new builds system first. (Also, having a nomination that sounds like a joke doesn't help, though that's not Skuld's fault.) — HarshLanguage [[Image:qswearing_small.png|HarshLanguage]] 05:34, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 4) With the upcoming builds wipe i feel that we do not need any more admins. --[[Image:Kitty1.jpg|19px|]] (Talk) (Cont) (Cool) [[Image:Soft2.jpg|19px|]]06:11, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 5) I feel that his attitude towards other wiki editors needs improvment. -  B e X or [[Image:Bexor.png]]  07:52, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 6) Too...much...sarcasm... --[[User:Sigm@|Sig mA
 * We all know why Skuld has been demoted, let us not do that again. --[[User:Sigm@|Sig mA
 * 1) While a respected and fun wiki member as well as an obviously experienced wiki member, Skuld is just not admin material. He agitates people quite often on the builds section, for one. Deserving people, yes, but still he has behaviors that are un-admin like. He proved that to us once before and no doubt he will prove it again. His apparent refusal of nomination seems to mean that he doesn't even want adminship. If he shapes up his act (which actually has a good possibilty thanks to the build wipe), then I may neutralize this vote. Until then, he needs to prove that he is more than just a member and a cool dude. As a side note, these "SKULD KAWWAII ^______^" votes are a little unsettling.--Nog64Talk [[Image:Yaaaay.JPG]] 16:39, 22 March 2007 (CDT)
 * SKULD KAWWAII!!!!!!!11!! ^_______^ &mdash;[[Image:BlastThatT.jpg]]Blastedt 16:11, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Sempai is kawaii?&mdash; [[Image:Azroth sig.png||builds]] Azroth  [[Image:Azroth sig2.png||talk]] 16:29, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) Weak Oppose Both sides make good arguments here, but for now at least, I am leaning towards the opposition a bit more. Admittedly, the quality of the nomination and some of the votes in favor of adminship did contribute to my decision to vote opposed.  Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 01:10, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Appreciate the compliment. I mean, it must be me on the other side, cause the other votes are "I like Skuld" and "Skuld could beat Abaddon". It's weird casting a favored vote, but I trust our system of checks and balances. This isn't politics, I don't vote for people I find pretty or likeable. I vote for people who are responsible enough not to abuse their power. It's just that simple. NightAngel 01:56, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) --Misfate 20:44, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) He is a good contributer but as said as above he is rude to everyone and everybody and abuses his power a little too much. BTW what does KAWWAII mean?- Leader Rat [[Image:Rat.jpg|19px]] 18:57, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Kawaaii = cute :P we have determined skulds true form by lookin gthrough anime :D (Not a fifty five 20:50, 25 March 2007 (CDT))
 * 1) Based on recent events and past contributions and attitudes, oppose--Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] 21:30, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Throwing a delete tag on a joke build, and pointing out sock accounts? I fail to see how this reflects poorly on him. -Auron [[Image:Elit Druin.jpg|19px||My Talk]] 22:11, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * How was it a joke build? And thats just one example of his behavior--Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] 22:14, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * eh well the build was a joke to you and I, but skuld's not an admin anymore and he can't just add delete tags to builds that the author honestly believed was good. Yeah policy sucks :((Not a fifty five 22:16, 25 March 2007 (CDT))
 * It wasn't a joke build from point-of-view. It was a "slinky" masterpiece, the same author (or group of authors) that made the A/Mo 55 sin named "deathproof robert pickton" (and numerous other crap builds). They're written as jokes, just to be annoying on the Wiki. Skuld points out the accounts collaborating later on in the discussion. Please... don't use that as an example if you have no idea what happened there. -Auron [[Image:Elit Druin.jpg|19px||My Talk]] 22:56, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Heh, yeah. "Redwood"  Forget my comment.(Not a fifty five 01:39, 26 March 2007 (CDT))

Neutral
]] 07:11, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) o.O'...More than likely I'll change my vote to favored next time I stop by, but it's 4:00AM here and I think at this point I'm too much of a baka to cast a good vote. ^_^; I love you Sempai. <3 *glomp*&mdash; [[Image:Azroth sig.png||builds]] Azroth  [[Image:Azroth sig2.png||talk]]  03:53, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) I really dont know. Skuld has contributed so much, but does removing his powers stop him from doing so still? Skuld was often rude, sarcastic, uncompassionate and sometimes plain illogical, but he was also efficient and got the job done for the most part. IIRC, isnt he only what 16-17? Thats my age and I wouldn't even dream of being a mod. I cant even vote! I know hes changed too, but is that just because he has no power? I think its too early to tell, its only been like a month.--&mdash; <font color=#B00202>Hyprodimus Prime  [[Image:hyprodimusprimewikisig.png||talk]] 04:29, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
 * He is 14 or so --[[User:Sigm@|<font color=#2a7510>Sig <font color=#d8be01>mA
 * Is that a bad thing or a good thing? Hmmmmmm Sirocco 18:43, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) I just took a look at the favored votes. I would personally vote favored, but on a nomination like that... no. -- Nova  [[Image:NovaSmall.PNG]] --  (contribs) 20:05, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) Skuld's cool and all but the only arguments for his adminship are that he probably won't abuse his powers. Hell admin me then.  Not quite sure what to make of it (Not a fifty five 20:51, 25 March 2007 (CDT))
 * Sure, someone nominate Not a Fifty Five :) NightAngel 01:10, 26 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Haha, I could prolly get crazytreeboy to. Irl friends are good for something ya? :D (Not a fifty five 01:22, 26 March 2007 (CDT))
 * 1) I'm a fan of Skuld, but considering that he has not accepted or denied the nomination, and also that his people skills are blunt as ever (not that that's a bad thing, but not always best for an admin on wikis), I can do nothing but remain neutral. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 21:58, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) Since I did not really have an opportunity to see how Skuld was on his first go-around, I have been looking over the votes. Most of the people who want him back as an admin are either just posting their signature or giving inane reasons.  On the other hand, the votes and reasons in Unfavored seem to back up their vote, and they give a decent reason.  As of right now, I am staying neutral, but am leaning more to unfavored. --User:Albinobird[[Image:Albinobirdsigicon.JPG|Albinobird]] 22:16, 25 March 2007 (CDT)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.