User talk:Lightblade

Hey and welcome to the Wiki! In reference to the vandal and the helpful reverts you did, there is a way to make Admins aware and ban the vandal user. On the vandal user's User Page, place Ban|reason for banning|what article it took place in, enclosed in. For an example, see what I did with that guy User:68.218.165.40. --Gares Redstorm 12:54, 4 May 2006 (CDT)

Archemorus and Viktor
If you read the articles, they do mention that the heroes had help. However, the Luxon and Kurzick people are indoctrinated to believe that their particular hero did the whole thing by himself. I believe Rhea even says as much in the Boreas Seabed cinematic, and if you talk to the various NPCs, they will tell you all about their hero being the most important figure in the fight against Shiro. F G 17:07, 7 May 2006 (CDT)

Talk:Team - 55/Famine
Your vote is a bit disturbing. If the build works, it should be deemed as tested and workable. The point is not to vote 'unfavored' because there is a better build, even more so as the other build is fir a different profession. For example I might wnt to duo UW with my ranger. Can I play the SS buil? No. But I can play the slower Famine ranger. If the build works, it should be voted as tested. -- (talk) 10:18, 29 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Bump. Could you please explain your vote and views here. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 05:09, 24 September 2006 (CDT)

Redirects
Please note Guildwiki's current policy on redirects at GW:REDIRECT.

Discussions have been on-and-off for some time to change this; but for now, this is still the site policy. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:56, 18 September 2006 (CDT)

BUMP! Please don't create any more redirects for things like Borea seabed‎ -> Boreas Seabed. GW:REDIRECT says that incorrect capitalizations are not a valid reason to create a redirect. Thanks. --Xasxas256 21:02, 18 September 2006 (CDT) (I read the timestamp wrong) --Xasxas256 21:03, 18 September 2006 (CDT)