GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/El Nazgir

== El Nazgir (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count &bull; RFA page) ==

I first thought about El Nazgir in the role of an admin when I saw him explaining to a new user how to get a page deleted via delete tags, thinking "if he was an admin, he could have done that himself". El Nazgir strikes me as a person who has been active all over the wiki, who has an eye for the wiki community, and who reaches out to other users, while at the same time being affable and pleasant. He definitely does not overestimate himself, possibly the contrary. He has been an admin on UnAnswers, and has been using his admin powers there reluctantly. I believe El Nazgir would not disappoint if made admin now, and I expect he is going to, with time, grow into an excellent, fully rounded administrator. While having been a user since 2007, El Nazgir's period of strong activity started in January of this year, and as such he would be the admin who best represented the most recent generation of editors. -- ◄mendel► 11:00, October 7, 2009 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Instructions
''Please summarize the candidate's qualifications below. Add your summary as a brief bullet-point. Then go to the talkpage and explain your points in more detail.''

''To add a rebuttal to another's point, indent and add another brief bullet. Then discuss on the talkpage.''

Discussions, more elaboration on a point, lengthy counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the talkpage.

Supporting qualities

 * (list specific supporting factors here)

Opposing qualities

 * (list specific opposing factors here)

Neutral/Double-edged qualities

 * (list specific neutral factors here)

Community Support
''Please place your signature to indicate your support or non-support. Do not argue. Also realize that this is in no way influential towards the other merits of the candidate, just a gauge of public support.''

I support this candidacy.

 * 1) RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.png]] 12:58, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) The more the merrier! Random Time 
 * 3) your sig here

I oppose this candidacy.

 * 1) your sig here

I am neutral/undecided.

 * 1) your sig here