Talk:Game updates/20060615

Huh? What gives, Stabber? --Karlos 20:45, 15 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Another issue with being verbatim with the official website, I presume. - 20:47, 15 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Indeed. And you have broken 1RV. But you are an admin, Karlos, so you knew that. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 20:47, 15 June 2006 (CDT)


 * You never explained your RV. And your reasoning now makes no sense. I thought we already had that debate in the last update. --Karlos 20:51, 15 June 2006 (CDT)


 * There was no consensus on departure from the bug-for-bug treatment of update notes. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 20:54, 15 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Also, that discussion is not relevant here, as it was about the section heading for the update, not the update notes themselves. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 20:56, 15 June 2006 (CDT)


 * That's your take on it. Those who were involved at the time chose to end the discussion on a different conclusion. We do not copy their formatting, never have. this is what's at issue here. Do we copy ANet's website formatting when we copy game update test? The answer is no. Never has been yes. They never wikify their links, they don't have the same colors or bullets. It's a very weak argument. Copying text != Copying crappy formatting. --Karlos 20:59, 15 June 2006 (CDT)