User talk:Sefre13616

The description "barrage adrenaline shouter" is couverd by this build : Build:P/R_Battery_Discharge Sir On The Edge 18:37, 8 December 2006 (CST)
 * I've actualy deleted my paragon but havent yet gotton aroudn to removeing from user page.-- Sefre [[image:Prepared_Shot.jpg|24px|]] 20:00, 8 December 2006 (CST)

Your user page
Hi and welcome to the wiki! I noticed you are using some elements on your user page which have been inspired by other Guild Wiki users. Could you please add a credits note on your user page. Something like "This user page has been inspired by User:Example1, User:Example2 and User:Example3." will be fine. I hope you enjoy your time with us! -- (talk) 20:08, 8 December 2006 (CST)


 * Oh, sorry, I just realised from your contributions that you aren't completely new as I thought. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 20:10, 8 December 2006 (CST)
 * My userpage was not "inspired" by anyone other then myself, I have used certian codes I found around the wiki sites due to the fact that most of the codeing is still confuseing to me. if useing a codes base structure that was found on other pages needs to be credited then ill try to track down the pages that I got it from... And no, I've been useing the wiki for a rather long time now,mostly for looking up info and adding builds for my guild and others in a easier to read formant.-- Sefre [[image:Prepared_Shot.jpg|24px|]] 21:56, 8 December 2006 (CST)
 * If your layout and code wasn't heavily inspired by one or two specific users, then no credit is needed. Thank you and sorry for the trouble. It's not always easy to to be sure if a user page is the users own creation or not, so I posted just to be sure. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 02:39, 9 December 2006 (CST)

You have mentioned the "list" from the dreaded pvpers a few times and i thought you might like to actually see it. if you havent encountered it already here is the link --Coloneh RIP 23:23, 18 December 2006 (CST)
 * 1)Thats the wronmg list I was reffering to,(which I do not agree all builds are decent but majority are) 2) I already pointed out reasons that the builds on the list you pointed out were on the list(nerfed/better skills with campaigns) when someone else tried to use that as a excuse to say the comunity can't vote well.-- Sefre [[image:Prepared_Shot.jpg|24px|]] 08:59, 19 December 2006 (CST)

New builds policy proposal
Hi. As somebody who has made several contributions to the discussion at GuildWiki talk:No Original Builds I just wanted to draw your attention to an alternative policy I've proposed at Build Split. If you've got the time I'd be very grateful if you could give it a read through and leave any comment you may have on its talk page. Thanks! --NieA7 10:41, 19 December 2006 (CST)

userbox
I definitly think we should create a user box that says something like "This user supports creatvivity and does not think the top 100 guilds are the only ones that can make good builds" or something. What do you think?--TheDrifter 15:14, 21 December 2006 (CST)

GFDL license
You haven't released your contributions under the GFDL license yet, but I would like to use your wow icon in the new official wiki. Would you mind releasing atleast that single image if not all of your contributions? -- (talk) 20:16, 12 February 2007 (CST)
 * I'm not sure exactly what a GFDL license is or how to release it or whatever. If this is about something going on aroudn the wiki recently I'd be in the dark about it as I havent realy checked in much recently.-- Sefre [[image:Prepared_Shot.jpg|22px|]] 22:24, 12 February 2007 (CST)
 * The new official wiki of ANet uses the GNU Free Document License, which also allow commercial use of content, but the GuildWiki license doesn't. That means that in order to allow us copy stuff from here to there the contributions must be released under GFDL by the user who made the contributions as they hold all rights to the contributions. There are two easy-to-use user boxes for this, and  . Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 23:35, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

Your Build Documentation
People will ruin the namespace, build Buildwiki lives on. []. Also, you should talk to Auron and Krowman, they are organizing the documentation effort. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs)
 * Aye, m8. See User:Auron of Neon/Archive effort. - [[Image:Candle.jpg|12px]] Krowman (talk • contribs) 21:46, 22 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Don't mean to sound rude but its personal cause it doesn't contain builds that I don't particularly like. What the folks at NOB are going to do with old builds is not what troubles me, its how the creativity system will be stuttered by this change. Anyways to be honest I don't know enough about the wiki to help much in a archiving plan anyways.--Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] 21:51, 22 March 2007 (CDT)
 * True, original builds will be relegated to the user space which is sad for all of us creative types ;), but on the other hand, there are simply too many problems with the current build section. Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 17:51, 23 March 2007 (CDT)

Personal Attack(s)
I'll be quite frank. I don't like you, and you don't like me; however, I'm not going to flame you in the middle of policy discussion, and I'd appreciate if you did the same. Running to report you to an admin seems like a cheesy course of action, but really; don't leave that as my only one. -Auron  00:05, 23 March 2007 (CDT)


 * Chill out. I'm finally going through all this build mess and I am dealing with everyone that needs to be dealt with.


 * Sefre, you comments "Your all a bunch of hypocritical brats..." and calling Auron a smartass is in violation of GW:NPA. Another infraction and administrative action will be taken. &mdash; Gares 15:10, 23 March 2007 (CDT)


 * 1)I told him not to be a smart ass, based on his comment to me.
 * 2)Gares- how is that a "personal" attack? It was a insult to the idea contributions of the policies, how is it personal? And FYI, theres plenty of atatcks going on all over the place, on builds and out of it, why is a admin stepping in now?
 * 3)Auron-How come you don't like me? You disagree with my thoughts so your a enemy now?--Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] 17:42, 23 March 2007 (CDT)

Cupido Junior
I don't want you getting the wrong end of the stick, incase you haven't read it already, the followup can be viewed at Build talk:Mo/R Cupido Junior, Requests for adminship/Skuld (2) and (kind of) User_talk:Skuld. The members of We Are All Pretty [Ugly] find it funny to raise the blood pressure of editors around here, and tend to magnify the terrible builds that float around. I can see how that must of come off to you, i'll try expand the delete tag a little so that an outsider could have seen what I was referring to. Take care &mdash; Skuld 10:37, 26 March 2007 (CDT)