GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Ereanor

Ereanor (talk &bull; contribs)
He has been an active and helpful member of the GuildWiki community for a long time now, and he is on for lengthy periods of time every day. He can help out with cleanup and general admin duties. Lord Belar 00:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
 * Thanks for the nomination. I'd be glad to make a better use of my time here. I accept.[[Image:Ereanorsign.jpg]]reanor 01:32, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Has been a long-time contributor to this wiki, and, especially recently, is very active. Strong support.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 00:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * After reading Gem's post, I'm moving to neutral.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 00:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Yeah, sabotage em for us will ya? Too much of a pain trying to get people to come here instead of defecting over there. Anyway, Ereanor is kinda one of those names that anyone who's been around for a moderate amount of time should know, and will be just fine with performing admin duties IMO --Gimmethegepgun 02:18, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Meh, might as well support ^_^ --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:25, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) why not, we need more people. Cress Arvein 02:50, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Decent contributor on GWW, I assume he must be better here (not saying that you're bad at GWW) to be running for Sysop. Eloc 02:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Smexxxy like Gimmethegepgun also you are a very good contributor seeing from recent changes a few hours ago I think. --Hellbringer  (T/C) 02:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with Marco also about what Gem said. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 20:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Changing to support. [[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png]]Entrea Sumatae   [Talk]  23:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Seen too little contributions on the wiki. [[Image:ShadyGuy.jpg]] 11:03, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Not active at all outside of his own user page and user talk page according to his contribution list. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 23:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * To reinforce my point: GuildWiki name space contribs, GuildWiki talk name space contribs, main name space contribs, main talk name space contribs. I just don't see any use in giving sysop tools. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 00:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Good guy but I think Gem hit the nail on the head with this one. &mdash;♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 00:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually Shadyguy said the same thing first. It wasn't what he said, it's just because it was Gem who said it, wich started some vote moves.[[Image:Ereanorsign.jpg]]reanor 04:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * FYI my hardcore contributor times went away with the builds wipe, since I started here as a builds-oriented user. I didn't like PvX much and became a content/community-oriented GuildWiki user quite recently, but soon after I focused most of my work to GWW (the usual reasons). I stay here mainly because of the community now, especially to hang out with some cool ppl (most of them found at Entropy's talkpage), and I accepted this nomination precisely to help the community and those users. Contribs count is a valid point, but I just wanted you to know that the porpuse of this RfA (or at least what it means to me) doesn't have much to do with that.[[Image:Ereanorsign.jpg]]reanor 04:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not because I was the one who said it, it was because I posted easy to follow links and the users who don't bother to check otherwise could do so easily. Also, if your main concentration is on gww and you are here just to hang around I don't see any point in being a sysop then. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 15:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Agreed with Gem. &mdash;  ク  Eloc  貢  15:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Again, agreed with Gem. -- Shadow crest   16:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Not nearly as much crime-fighting Skillz as the other candidates, haven't seen too much of him. Still, if it were an option, I'd have to go with "Mild support" [[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png]]  Entrea Sumatae  04:43, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Don't see him online often (diffrent time zones?), but he seems okay. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]] -- (s)talkpage 23:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Not enough mainspace edits.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 00:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Meh. Changed my mind. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 13:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Clarify: It's not because of anything Gem said; I've known Ereanor as a user for a while and although he doesn't make too many contribs to the "important places" he is a knowledgable user and I like him. (And when he does make "important contribs" they are good.) Generally he has good judgment of issues and I can't recall any serious disputes he has had either. However, I changed my vote to Neutral (not oppose) because I think there are still better candidates running atm. You may say that because we have such a shortage, I shouldn't be one to argue, but adminship and RfA are still not to be given lightly. The most precise statement I can make is: While I believe you have good intentions and would only do good with sysop tools, I believe Gimme and Jedi would do even better. They are more active, have more edits, and I know them even better. Please don't take this personally... [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 15:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Changes. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 20:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Looking over other's comments puts me here. Cress Arvein(Talk) 20:11, 14 December 2007 (UTC)