User talk:Entropy/Archive 27

New Project
I propose we publish a tiers list for the monsters of Guild Wars. Seeing as this is a huge number of monsters, maybe we could limit this to just special enemies like bosses. Tiers would be campaign-centered, so we'd have one for Prophecies, Factions, Nightfall, and Eye of the North. I know that I already did this with a poll (which had ~100? votes) but an official unofficial list would be fun too. (T/C) 05:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That comes dangerously close to build wars, although levels and monster skills would also come into play... it's an interesting thought. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 05:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I voted
--◄mendel► 15:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Ahh the irony... voted. Silver Sunlight [[Image:SSunlight.jpg|18px]] (T/C) 21:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * See, it's really ironic because on the poll for comparing strongest bosses, 114 people voted...and on the poll for whether INAFR or LAME was more famous, that was 91 votes. Right now there is only a pansy 30 or so. :p Clearly, people care more about Guild Wars than the democratic process! [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 20:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Or those polls existed for a longer time, thus allowing more people to vote. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]] -- (contribs) &emsp;(talk)  20:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * ...in America. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 20:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * ...in general. Bosses and INAFR/LAME have been there for a multitude of days, if not weeks, and the "VOTE YES OR DO NOT VOTE" has been there for a mere day. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]] -- (contribs) &emsp;(talk)  20:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * But...this is the public forums. It's like, me that we're talking about. D: [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 20:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * BTW Yu-Gi-Oh abridged reference. Silver Sunlight [[Image:SSunlight.jpg|18px]] (T/C) 12:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Oversighters
I've been meaning to ask about this for a while, but could we bug Kyle to have some (or all) of the admins added to the Oversighters group? That would make it real easy for us to selectively delete certain excessively vulgar vandalisms like this one, instead of having to delete the whole article, then restore all but that one revision. &mdash;Dr Ishmael 18:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I did not even know that such a feature existed. To know that such a power is being denied to me because of silly usergroups is unacceptable. I will most certainly go bug Kyle about it.
 * ...oh yeah, and you other sysops can get it too, I suppose. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 18:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Brought up at Admin_noticeboard before. --JonTheMon 18:18, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I thought it had been, but couldn't remember where. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 18:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I knew it sounded familiar. This also would need a new userbox, by the way. Something with a link to Overseer Boktek or such. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 18:30, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * User talk:KyleH. Sorry :p [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 20:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That's evidence - not to be oversighted away. It's hidden away enough from the kiddies unless some clever people link to it O.O --◄mendel► 23:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Evidence? For what?  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 23:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * For blocks and such. --◄mendel► 23:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think any evidence is needed for that username. >.> And the deleted revision itself still shows up on the user's contributions, see Special:Contributions/KyleH; the fact that it was hidden would be evidence enough, I'd think.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 23:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

i dont get it
how did u make evryone <3 u so much? whoru neway?? &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.113.154.83 (contribs).
 * No u. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 21:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Random note: I like how /. calls all unregistered posters "Anonymous Coward". Maybe we should modify our unsigned template to do that, too...  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 21:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Needs moar GW:AGF / GW:YAV. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 22:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Awww. Well, how about "Anonymous Person-Who-Might-Be-a-Coward-But-Might-Just-Have-Forgotten-to-Log-In"? :P  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 22:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No one ever "forgets" to log in, they choose to do so. Also, I see what you did there. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 22:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * So slashdot is anti-4chan? [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 22:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Remember anons are braver in a way. Showing your IP is way more dangerous than having a username,and they still have talkpages.[[Image:Ereanorsign.jpg]]reanor 00:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Also remember that most people don't realize that, so we have anons that think they're being smarter by only showing their IP. And anons could be using proxies, too.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 00:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Actually, I am quite impressed with your conduct. You are the epitome of what a sysop should be; not perfect, but willing to make mistakes and learn from them. Even when you're wrong on an issue (which isn't often tbh), you take the time to describe in detail why you came to the conclusion you did; that helps everyone involved understand the situation, and reduces the chances someone will be overly offended by your actions.

I was afraid you'd be hurt by my leaving; I tried not to insinuate you in my accusations, but it might have happened regardless. I do not think you cause GuildWiki any harm; rather, you're one of the few users left who really understand what a wiki means and what it needs to succeed. Hell, people on this wiki don't even understand that, so I'd say you're doing pretty good. I wish you (and PanSola and Gem) luck in keeping GuildWiki a friendly and fun place to contribute. -Auron 04:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

^k thar. I win. End of discussion. (T/C) 10:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Air of Superiority
Wikia totally wins over ANet for two things:
 * 1) Being able to embed YouTube videos.
 * 2) The almighty Poll extention.

"You never appreciate something until you have lost it." <- Believe it! (T/C) 10:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Prodding ANet tech ftw? These extensions can be installed on any MW install, you know. But then again they're probably IM-worthy, so I dunno. --◄mendel► 10:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC) & 10:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * But it's spreading democracy! Surely that is an important goal to ANet? :) I'm just saying it is kind of ironic because the GWW has always prided itself on having the superior technology and firepower (which they usually do), but in this case we have them beat. And I can't pass up that kind of opportunity. :) [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 10:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Ereanorsign.jpg]]reanor 14:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh I'm very aware of that Ereanor; I've said it myself before that votes (~= polls) mean absolutely nothing towards consensus and meaningful discussion. That's why I have always opposed them pretty strongly for anything that mattered (builds, RfA, probably some other things).
 * Teh point was more how I cannot use polls to interact with the community/make statements/be crazy on GWW/GW2W as I use them currently on my userpage. For example, I really wanted to port over my "DEMOCRACY IN ACTION" thing and see if anyone screamed at me for a policy violation. :p And of course there are just more people in general there, so a srs bsns question such as "Split builds with 3 attribs is gud" could get more decisive results. Finally, even if everyone on GuildWiki agrees that an NPC should be named after me, that doesn't do a whole lot of good since ANet doesn't check here (as far as we know, anyway) :) [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 14:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)