Talk:Zombie Warlock

AL Research
Regular AL: 43 (Slashing, Blunt, Fire, Water, Air, Earth)

From the lack of Blunt penalty, zombie warlock are probably not skeletons (though Skeletonslaying has the final say). -PanSola 17:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thinking that they aren't skeletons, they leave exploitable corpses. --Rainith 21:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Do they take extra damage from Smiting? Maybe they aren't 'undead', despite being called Zombie. --JoDiamonds 07:54, 28 March 2006 (CST)
 * I don't remmeber, but I'm willing to bet money that holy does double to them. -SolaPan 08:08, 28 March 2006 (CST)

They seem to be undead. --Gares Redstorm 08:50, 28 March 2006 (CST)

Duh note
this. 1RV is in the way. It's an Undead, so it takes double damage. Want to add that to EVERY Undead? Even the name implies Undead...... --- -- (s)talkpage 14:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it's a helpful note in this case. The Zombie Warlock can confuse some players. Olim Thrice 17:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it's worth noting for the rare cases of fleshy undeads. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 18:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not 'rare' when you have nearly a half dozen fleshy undead types in Kryta -all of which are commonly encountered. Anyway, the point I made concerned the Zombie Warlock, whose skeletal appearance can be deceiving. Olim Thrice 18:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Fleshy undeads are not rare, all mummies, and all "zombie" undead are fleshy. There used to be a separate category, but it was done away with. I honestly think it should be brought back though, there's more than enough candidates for it.&mdash; Powersurge360 Melancholia  19:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)