User talk:GW-Shadowphoenix

Congrats
Congratulations on your promotion over at Fable! It's a rising wiki that already pulls 100k pageviews on a good day, that is a fifth of GuildWiki's! Planning to inherit Kadajvince's position? ;-) --◄mendel► 23:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Actually Michaeldsuarez took Kadajvince's position; I guess I am just the right hand woman ;) -- Shadowphoenix  23:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I always think of Michael D as Wikia staff, dunno why that is :-P -- ◄mendel► 02:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Now that is weird (look here): you and Michael don't have your groups listed behind your names, although he is in both Sysop and Bureaucrat (which is why I missed it). But PhilNelson has that. Want to start guessing what setting of sannse's is doing that? -- ◄mendel► 02:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I didn't notice that. A cache issue maybe?  If it doesn't correct itself by tomorrow I will contact someone.  -- Shadowphoenix  03:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I sense conspiracy. :) *goes to check usergroups* [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 03:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, uberfuzzy says listusers is horribly broken + cached + evil. -- ◄mendel► 03:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed, listusers must be Kitler's accomplice. -- Shadowphoenix  03:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Drama Queens
I don't know of anyone who fits that title more aptly than yourself, other than perhaps Warwick.

In other news...
 * 1) You fail at reading comprehension.
 * 2) You are either ignorant of or choose to ignore how many people have been fed up with you over the years with your drama episodes.
 * 3) You and I have never gotten along, and so your latest drive-by QQ does nothing but make me lol. I suppose I am deserving of it for all the times I've talked shit about you behind your back, though.

(T/C) 06:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes because "im so active here and at GWW that I cause so much drama". Spare me.  I'm not QQing, put up or shut up if your gonna leave go ahead and do it.  -- Shadowphoenix  06:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd like to reiterate #1, "You fail at reading comprehension", because I am not leaving. You may not be active any more (thank goodness), but I could think of a few choice examples of prime bitchiness off the top of my head. One would involve birthdays; the other, guilds.
 * I consider it QQing if the only reason you log onto a site is to bawww about how bad things are. You don't contribute here anymore; frankly, no one notices or cares about your rants, other than me because I stalk everyone's talkpages to catch such signs of civil disobedience unrest among the peons. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 06:23, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * lol, your interrupting my Fable Wiki time deary -- Shadowphoenix  06:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This sounds like personal issues that don't concern the wiki. Please take this to email/IM/etc. and spare the rest of the wiki any more unnecessary drama.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 06:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course master Ishy.  -- Shadowphoenix  06:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

When you make a commitment to being an admin you need to keep it -- we have any number of inactive admins. Concerning the Bureaucracy, as far as I recall Entropy got that handed to her much as I did, with the commitment thrust upon us; we have had three Bureaucrats who had a discussion period beforehand, and of these, JR is inactive, Auron resigned and only PanSola is still with us, doing exactly what he committed to do. The one thing bureaucrats are especially not committed to be is perfect; nor is there a commitment to please everyone. While a bureaucrat is by role a "servant of the wiki", he's not everone's bitch. -- ◄mendel► 09:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * What a great argument! Hug Wub Banana 16:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)