Talk:Strike as One

I'm not sure what to make of this. If it weren't an elite it would be very interesting. Arshay Duskbrow
 * Agreed, Im guessing this skill will be reworked eventualy to make it more effetive. Because right now this issnt powerful enough to use as an elite. ~ Zero rogue x 22:52, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
 * They need to increase the number of attacks. And is that a wolf plinking a bow? o_O --Ufelder 06:54, 28 September 2006 (CDT)
 * They need to increase the damage. Enraged Lunge adds up to 80 damage every 5 seconds and this will add ~60 in the same time (pure guess here and I guessed high).  The attacks won't likely exceed the recharge so the number of attacks is fine (unless they are split between you).  I think they made this thinking that a bunny thumper would switch to this instead.  I hope they improve it when NF comes out.  And I think that's a were-warthog using that bow.  lol--Vallen Frostweaver 09:53, 28 September 2006 (CDT)

+9x5 = +45 damage for your pet

+9x5 = +45 damage for you

45+45 = +90 damage total, and that's just at 12 Beast mastery, so in theory, it does more damage than enraged. The problem would be getting in 5 hits in 10 seconds to use it consistantly, which with a hammer and chasing down targets, or even with a bow, could be pretty tricky. Probably no problem for your pet though.
 * Ok, Enraged does 80+ every 5 seconds making it about 160+ in 10 seconds. In 10 seconds using a fast bow (2 seconds) with an increased attack rate skill you can get an attack every 1.33 seconds and the pet at the same rate.  In 10 seconds you can then get 7.5 attacks from you and 7.5 attacks from the pet = 15 attacks for +9 each = 135 damage at 12 Beast Mastery.  Do the same for someone with a sword or axe and you get about 162 damage (.89 seconds per attack with IAS = 11 attacks in 10 seconds * 9 damage = 162 damage).  So I could see a melee character with 12 or better in Beast Mastery making use of this but most Bow Rangers will probably prefer Enraged to this.  On the contrary, I could see this being used with other pet attacks or a smaller pet skill bar as you don't need more Beast Mastery skills to take advantage of this like Enraged Lunge does.  Overall, it can do slightly more damage if done properly and is an even better method energy management while adding damage to your skills as it uses so little - just not as effective for spiking since you need all the damage attacks to hit to cause the extra damage.  I see this being a Warrior fun skill and not a Ranger skill as much.[[Image:VallenIconwhitesmall.JPG]]  Vallen Frostweaver  19:54, 1 October 2006 (CDT)

A boss in Turai's procession has this, but I apparently didn't mark where. --Fyren 20:30, 27 October 2006 (CDT)

I'd like to see this as a: 'For 30 seconds, you and your pet's next 5..9..10 attacks deal +5..9..10 damage, then it would be more 'usable', heck, W/R, 16 Axe Mastery, 12 Beastmastery, Heket's Rampage, This and Call of Haste, would own.. Still, it works as it is, and it works well, but there are still better elites. --My Name Is Not Dan 13:54, 16 November 2006 (CST)

Do attacks that create multiple shots like forked arrow or dual shot count as one or two attack for this skill? -Alinius

Ugh, the recharge 10 seconds is too slow. With a Short Bow and hekets rampage up, you can unload 5 attacks in like 7 sec. IMO, this should be changed to 5 sec recharge "for 30 sec, the next 10 attacks you or your pet make deal +1....+whatever damage", so if you're attacking faster then your pet, you get more advantage.--GTPoompt 19:01, 29 November 2006 (CST)

Self-affecting Shout?
I don't have this so I can't check: If you use this, does it count as a shout affecting yourself? Do you get an icon in the effects monitor? I'm thinking in terms of using this together with Warrior/Paragon skills that ask you be under the effects of a shout. Arshay Duskbrow 02:08, 25 November 2006 (CST)
 * Yes, it counts as a shout affecting yourself, yes on the icon in effects monitor, and yes on triggering paragon shout effects. Tests on whether or not it also affects your pet is inconclusive. --waywrong 07:23, 29 November 2006 (CST)