Talk:Pacifism

Bugged for heroes
I was fighting outside yaks bend, and i noticed koss has pacifism on him, but still he used triple chop. Anyone else noticed this? Jelmewnema 02:59, 24 February 2007 (CST)

Perhaps it means attacks, and not attack skills

If you pacified, oh say a stoneflesh mandragor, and your attacks did 0 damage to it, would it end the effect or does the foe have to actually lose health?--marcopolo47 21:57, 9 March 2007 (CST)
 * If Balthazar's Spirit is any indicator, yes. Balth still gains you energy if damage is reduced to zero via Life Barriers and Bonds on a warrior.  The reduced damage comes through as a rapid flow of -0s, doing no damage but providing great energy flow.  Most likely, this works in the same way. -DV
 * alright thanks--marcopolo47 21:05, 14 March 2007 (CDT)

"Rangers under the effect of Pacifism can't order their pets to attack." Not true anymore is it?

Does receiving damage from AoE skills such as Spitefull Spirit end the skills effect?Goldstix69 18:23, 4 May 2007 (CDT)


 * Probably &mdash; Skuld 18:26, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
 * Okay I guess I am going to have to test with someone in the guild hall when I get the chance.Goldstix69 18:33, 4 May 2007 (CDT)

New trivia
I hate trivia... maybe it's not a reference to a magic card, but just a name describing the general effect of the spell? Silver Sunlight 11:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia's entry on pacifism. [[Image:ShadyGuy.jpg]] 12:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That's so stupid, I removing it. They both have similar meanings because pacifism generally means you don't really do anything --Blue.rellik 12:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Please, you ought to read one of marco's skill pages, you'll feel less trivial afterwards. Pacifism is a word meaning you don't take part in violence such as wars. It's almost saying that Charge! or Retreat! was a reference to millions of things, books, games, movies, reality, wars, the amount of stuff is ridiculous. It is an extremely easy to think that something is related to something, try to look up what it means before YES, IT'S A FREAKIN REFERENCE-ing, because IT'S NOT A FREAKIN REFERENCE in some/most cases. Flechette 12:26, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Anyone thought about using it with like 1 monk using it on the foe 1 touch ranger touches the foe (life stealing dont count) That could own a lot of enemies.. 84.108.205.182 10:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

What? Slow down, I can't keep up!
Hm... Rangers who cannot attack, may not order their pets to attack by attacking themselves? I think most people got that themselves... -->Suicidal Tendencie 09:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)