User talk:Jagre/archive 2

My talk page
Do not ever again erase things on my talk page--ever. That is in my user space. You and everyone else are free to comment as you see fit (excepting vandalism), but once a comment is written it stays written. Jinkas 00:07, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

NOTICE
You are currently in violation of multiple site policies. General vandalism by blanking parts of discussions; violation of GW:1RV, violations of GW:NPA. I STRONGLY urge you to read site policies. Any further violations will result in a ban. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:55, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
 * FYI: Once someone has replied to a post, please do not blank it out the post to which they are replying. The issue is that it results in the reply appearing to dangle out of nowhere and out of context, disrupting the history of the conversation.  You can strike out your own prior posts once someone has replied to it, but it should not be blanked. Likewise, don't blank out replies from others.  The main exception to this is your personal talk page (ie: the one we're on here), where you can blank out entire conversations if you wish (your own posts and those of others) - as long as you don't leave replies from others dangling without the text to which they are replying, as you should not do anything that results in someone else's words being out of context.


 * While I'm at it, I know it's a lot of reading ... but I only gave you links to some of our policies last night. From the Main Page, you can also reach the full list at GW:POLICY.  You may also be interested in our style and formatting guidelines listed at GW:S&F.  Another procedure guideline to reference would be the build vetting procedures shown at GW:VETTING.  And, lastly, just to point something out, at the bottom of the page when you edit something is the text "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it."  Some contributors tend to try taking personal ownership of articles, builds, etc.  But, once released into a wiki, it's really up to the wiki community what to do with it at that point. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 11:19, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

the user page
it is remarkably bad form to edit another users page. esp mine, since i've been known to be vindictive and wrathful, on occasion. --Honorable Sarah 02:25, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Hmmm... maybe Midnight08 needs to make a new skill entitled "Wrath of Sarah" Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs)
 * I think that was accidental ... viewing other posts he made on other user's talk pages on the same subject - I think he meant to post on your talk page and accidentally made it to your user page. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:02, 19 March 2007 (CDT)


 * thank you barek. Jagre 04:05, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
 * it probably was a mistake, which is why i posted a polite comment here instead something more drastic. my PvP character is "Wrathful Was Sarah", for reference. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 21:20, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

WTF
Seriously dude, WTH is wrong with you? and then you wonder the reason why the builds section will get a wipe. you kept editing a dead build for hours talking to no-one ,about no-one-cares-what. flooding the recent changes page. i have no words.--Babbo Elvis 09:52, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

response
If it weren't a completely crap build I might rethink my vote... In fact, I'm seriously considering posting the build page/discussion on the teamiQ forums in the "threads of hilarity" thread.--Theonemephisto 16:17, 19 March 2007 (CDT)