GuildWiki:User Review/Warwick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.


 * Candidate withdrawn 

Warwick (talk &bull; contribs &bull; Edit Count)
Some people may say that this has been too soon since my former letdown of myself, and I do, to the most part, agree. I just want to see what kind of rationale I get when I don't answer back to every single comment, and argue. I think that most people found that very annoying last time, but its in my nature to argue for every single thing that I can scrounge for myself. I can't help it. I'm just putting this up to see what kind of votes I get when I myself am not here to respond to them. I already know that I won't be sysop'd. At least, I think so. To Entropy, or Admins, please feel free to remove/delete this at any time. Although you already had that right. As an add, if you think it should be there, move this to User Review (here) &mdash; Warw/Wick 19:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I do not accept my own nomination. This is just a check. &mdash; Warw/Wick 20:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) (your vote here)

Oppose

 * 1) Automatic oppose - Not significant time between RFAs for me to change mind RT  | Talk  20:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Same as above--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 20:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Incapable of admitting mistakes. Too obsessed with becoming a sysop. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 20:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Neutral - I really have not been on here long enough to have an opinion on RfA's :D -- Shadowphoenix  20:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.