User talk:Warwick/Archive 20

Spam war continued?
Eh? -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 15:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Grow up, guys. This is a wiki. I've heard plenty of instant-message programs exist if you want to flirt with each other. Avalance 15:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thats what talk pages and minor edits are for. Seriously, we're in the User:Warwick/Spam Crew! for a reason... --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 15:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's me, Fire Tock your new spam name can be Spam Crew!--Spam King 15:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thats sockpuppetry, and you cant spam on that acc since you have no permit. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 15:25, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, sockpuppet! RT | Talk  15:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Can we stop this silly spam war thing, it's not helping anyone! RT | Talk  15:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * its actually giving the 'wiki an actual activity, and RT, IIRC you spammed over 4 of my archives.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 15:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I swear I'll never use Fire Tock again.--[[image:SPAMMISH.GIF|19px]]‎ Spam  King  15:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ugh.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 15:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No, talk pages are not for spamming. I don't know where you got the idea, but it's wrong.
 * Wikipedia disallows any kind of idle chatter from talk pages. I understand we're a little more lenient, but c'mon... there's a limit, and brainless spamming crosses it. Really, use common sense. Avalance 16:28, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia disallows it because its huge and it'd get properly out of hand. Also, we have no rules against sockpuppets, if they aren't being used for disruption. Lord of all tyria 16:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * theres nothing left for this, and btw, we're in the spam crew for a reason. Seriously, stop brainlessly nagging my userpage.. I dont know who you think you are, but like everyone else on this wiki, you have no authority whatsoever over me, so GTFO. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 16:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Tbh, he has a point. And sysops/bcrats have authority over you. Lord of all tyria 16:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No they dont, since i dont have to do anything they say. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 16:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Just like this guy <font color="FF0099">RT </B>| <font color="Black">Talk</B>  16:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

No drops?
Take a good look at Style_and_formatting/Bestiary. Keep the drop section, make it say none. It's the same as skills, so it doesn't look like they have drops that haven't been added.<font color="#4682b4">Entrea Sumatae  <font color="#4682b4">[Talk]  23:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 15:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

mallyx
Sure, I'll wait till tomorrow. So you had better wait for me :P  --<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="#FF6699">Shadowcrest  21:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * K, DW ill wait. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Sitewide messages
Hi Warwick,

the messages are added by simply editing this page: MediaWiki:Sitenotice. Editing this is restricted to admins and Wikia staff.

--TOR 16:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Aww =P. I kinda guessed it'd be somthing like that, i actually meant it as a joke =P.. Still, would have been cool to see "Wurld Dominashun!" at the top of your screen =D --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 16:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Bonjour
Spam, much? -- -- talkpage 19:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Uhu, trying to get the wiki active again.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Saying everything is ugly won't help. --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] -- talkpage 19:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I've said some things look good! Just not many! --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Dont forget the 100's of "Yay"s ... Pointless >.> --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 19:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It was to uh.. express my joy at erm.. contributing to the articles so meaningfully, or some crap like that.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

+1 Viper, and look at Talk:Hylek_Nahualli. Jesus Christ Warwick, can't you look before you post? Why the spam all of a sudden? Going for another RFA and want more contribs? ---Jamster--- 19:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope, and even if I was, we dont have a 'crat on the wiki atm.. (check Administrator information). And only 2(Somtimes 3) active admins.. Im not joking about trying to make RC and the wiki more lively. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:35, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Your doing a great job <font color="FF0099">RT </B>| <font color="Black">Talk</B>  19:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks RT =] --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * What purpose does liveliness serve, exactly? -- Peej 19:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * gives the impression that theres actually a lot of people on the wiki. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Not when we can readily see all of the edits are from you. An who cares if there are people actually here, so long as the information is correct and up to date? -- Peej 19:46, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Meh, stop nagging me about my eccecentries, im bored. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Spamming isn't an eccentricity, it's annoying. :P -- Peej 19:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you say spam? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * sssssssssppppppppppppaaaaaaaaaaaaaaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Cress Arvein(Talk) 19:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Rawr. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes I did, because that's what it is. And it's annoying. Edits without real content don't "revive" anything, trust me I know. -- Peej 19:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Theres no winning with you, but i've been doing this for over 3 days now. Why havn't you complained before? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Because it's Monday. -- Peej 20:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * aha, i understand your frustration! --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 20:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Warwick, it shouldn't matter how long you've been doing it, spamming 'yay' pointlessly on 60 talk pages, and 'ugly' on another 10 is not a good use of the facilities available here. [[Image:Jamster Sig.jpg|19px]] ---Jamster--- 20:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Meh. No policy against me doing so. AND i have a spam permit.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 20:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ugh... Not a spam permit, <font color="FF0099">RT  </B>| <font color="Black">Talk</B>  20:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Got it from the admins INGAME. ^^ --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 20:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Screens or it didn't happen. And I almost guarentee you didn't get it from entropy, she's 8 hours behind you. Unless you were on at 3 in the morning. And @ jamster, the RfA process here is so corrupt because everyone knows each other and is friends with almost everyone else, especially the only people who would be considered an admin, so... unless a thousand knowledgeable contributors who intend to stay here appear out of this air, I don't see the RfA's going anywhere. --<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="#FF6699">Shadowcrest 21:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * True, and yeah i liedz but oh well, it was stolen from fire, and hence it was good enough. We never actually superspam, only fire (spam) and RT do that. the RfA's are going nowhere unless we get a new 'crat anyway.. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If biro thinks someone should be promoted, they will. The RfAs show a pool from which its possible to draw admins if the wiki needs them. Lord of all tyria 21:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Biro isnt active at all here anymore. We have 2 (or 3) admins now, and no active beauracrats. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Why does biro need to be active? There doesn't seem to be a mass of vandalism, or anything that actually requires a larger sysop/bcrat team. Its not like there's masses of empty content here. Lord of all tyria 21:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * good point i suppose. Im off for now, so laters everyone. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 21:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)