User talk:Viktor

Channeling Rit
Another Channeling ritualist fan :) Nice to know I'm not the only one. &mdash; Azaya 14:39, 15 February 2007 (CST)
 * The second I saw the 1:st of February 2007 patch I fell in love with Channeling attribute. It's so fun to play as channeling Rt, high damage and high heal can it get any better?, not to forget the versatility or the channeling skilltree; Warmonger's Weapon as well as Nightmare Weapon are 2 weaponspells that I find hard to live without :P and splinter weapon + barrage in PvE MMMMMmmmmmmmmmmm... - Viktor

Build:N/Me E-Denial Pressure
Hey, you voted favored on my Depravity Pressure build. That build was merged with another of my builds, the link to which is the title. If you still support the build being favored (and you like the main build on the page), you will need to put your signature on that build since the other is going to be deleted. Defiant Elements 22:06, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 * I remeber meeting a similar Depravity build (your is better), we the guy using it disabled both our monk and me, even if we won the match I noticed Depravity's pontential and it along with Signet of Humility wich usually is a monks main energy management skill your build disables them pretty quick - Viktor

Riddle
Anyone that solved my riddle I promise that you will be suprised if you do, due to the great rewards and simpleness of the answere or should I say instructions? - Viktor

Build:Rt/N Palpatine
Ok, at first glance: I think you will have much better success with the build if you go N/Rt, and employ a mixture of spirits and Channeling spells. The spirits can provide a little offense, but are mostly used for their e-mgmt. This would allow you to use the channeling magic spells with more proficiency. If you were looking to be more Necro-ish, you might want to try hex stacking and making use of Signet of Suffering. Personally, I think you should watch Ob Mode for a Spiritway team and see what their N/Rts are using, and copy their builds. - Krowman (talk • contribs)  00:20, 26 March 2007 (CDT)
 * This could only be considered a spike when used in conjuction with a number of other players.
 * You have chosen Rt/N for a not-so-great Elite and IP.
 * You have no cover hexes, meaning that your hexes will be easily removed.
 * Your build is extremely unfocused.
 * There is barely any synergy among the skills you have chosen.
 * You need better energy management for a spell spammer.
 * The damage you deal is ok; not bad, but not great.
 * The way you have written the build article makes it seem like a joke.
 * Ok I havent tried only tried this build in RA/AB and I found it to be very useful there as it is, one fact about flexible or "unfocused builds" as you call it is that they can support their team agains a wider range of oponents. If I ask you nicely will you test the build in RA I can remove the TA, HA and AB tags but its IMO defently a valid RA build due to its flexibility. A build that only focus on one type of oponents in RA run a big risk of losing when faced with the wrong oponent, without Insidious Parasite the build wont have any counter agains armored weapon users (besides from Nightmare Weapon). Without an enchantremover the build will suffer problems while dealing with monks. I will change the article to make it less homuristic, as for the energymanagement problem you mentioned I had no problem with that while within earshot of a spirit. However I only use Insidious Parasite while Im the target of attacks and it should not be used as a "spamming" skill. If you could test the build once or twice in RA (until you get in a decent team without any leavers...) then make your statment I would be pleased, you may very well make the same statment as before but your statement will carry more weight to me after you have tested it since I beleve you are underestimating the build.--[[Image:vik.PNG]] ( √ iktor ) 07:18, 26 March 2007 (CDT)

Credit
I am pretty sure you stole some of the userboxes on your page and the color scheme/layout from my page. Can I get some credit please? Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 02:10, 26 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Sure, like this? --[[Image:vik.PNG]] ( √ iktor ) 02:38, 26 March 2007 (CDT)