User talk:Skuld14148

Reverts
Hey I'm noticing all these "reverted edit by Naff, changed to last version by (random editor). I looked through the history of most of these and it seems like nothing is actually reverted by you o.O (Not a fifty five 13:28, 15 October 2006 (CDT))

Yeah nevermind, I see. Just put a hold on that for a lil bit tho if you like, its being talked about. Less work for you >.< if that's gonna happen I'll get to it myself. (Not a fifty five 13:50, 15 October 2006 (CDT))

Unrelated message
Hi, I still dont understand, so I guess can you please tell me were to find such information of when to sign or not information. Thank You. Because I dont know what are talk pages.
 * Found that at the top of your page. Looks like someone tried to contact you, lol. ~ Nilles (chat) 14:06, 15 October 2006 (CDT)
 * I sorted that out, just left it there for some reason :) &mdash; Skuld 14:28, 15 October 2006 (CDT)

Why the hell
Have you moved W/N Crippling Slash Sword Fable Warlord 11:47, 17 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Sorry for not responding, I've been ill for the past couple of days. This debate decided to delete all builds with nightfall skills in. I didn't delete it, but moved it away from the builds system. You can move it back when the game is out :) &mdash; Skuld 02:21, 18 October 2006 (CDT)

Quest stubs
Hi there. I want to help unstub some of the Quest stubs. It seems that a lot of them are just missing maps. Is there anything else I need to look out for? --  Karalin (talk|contribs) 04:26, 18 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Not that i'm aware of. Those look pretty done to me. Good luck :) &mdash; Skuld 04:46, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Great! Err... is there anyway to search for/link to/display pages in 2 categories? eg those in Category:Quest stubs and those in Category:Factions quests?

Reverts again
I just wanna why you reverted the secondary Necro edits. I just did some cosmetic changes and now it looks ugly like before... --85.25.136.135 04:51, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
 * What is the point of putting none as yet? Just remove the text O.o &mdash; Skuld 04:55, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
 * What is the point of putting an empty star for these which makes the little square appearing in the next text (under Firefox)? So why then not just completely delete "Example builds" with no buil in it. I just don't understand this "kicking" edits --18.78.1.92 05:03, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
 * To clarify what anon is saying, the empty text results in a rendering error. More important, however, is that "none yet" illustrates that the GuildWiki could use builds with that profession combination, which is better for us. I've reverted your change.


 * I've seen at least 5 reverts of recent edits of yours in the last 10 minutes&mdash;and those are just the ones on my watchlist. Normally this wouldn't bother me, but these have been things like blanked pages and redirects. Slow down a little and think about what you're doing. &mdash;Tanaric 07:41, 18 October 2006 (CDT)

Mungri
Want to farm Mungri sometime? I need his cap, and you need his weapon... and I'm ungodly bored. --Tisiphone 12:36, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
 * I'll help you get the cap but I don't hold much faith on getting the green ^^ &mdash; Skuld 12:39, 18 October 2006 (CDT)

Unfavored...why?
You moved my A/E Tempest Blades build from 'deceased' to 'unfavored' classification. I know it's a great build, b/c I've tried it myself countless times in a crapload of scenarios. Rather than simply slapping some 'unfavored' tag on it, as if the entire community judged it, rate it yourself or put to be "immediately tested".Sage722 16:07, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Mistake. I was changing back 55's edit to the previous one and got the wrong tag. Put it back :) &mdash; Skuld 16:09, 18 October 2006 (CDT)
 * You voted R/A Repeat Expertise Assassin as unfavored (vote not move), could you give any imput on why you didn't like it and how I could improve it?
 * You marked my build as candidate for deletion, and I think it should be removed. Two people have tested this build already and have said it works.  I think it would get tested by more people if it didn't have a deletion tag on it.  I know you think its a bad idea, but others have said they never had a problem with survival.Giangn626 21:52, 25 October 2006 (CDT)

About the talk page blanker...
I think THIS will stop him ^_^.-Onlyashadow, Top 100 Guild 13:15, 20 October 2006 (CDT)


 * A user blanking his/her talk pages are not against any policy and it's that user's choice whether they want to blank their page or not. &mdash; Gares 13:25, 20 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Erm...does my action look "administrative"? Cause I'm pretty sure I conveyed my message in a light and comedic manner.-Onlyashadow, Top 100 Guild 13:27, 20 October 2006 (CDT)


 * lol. I don't think an ASCII bunny is administrative, but I looked at the IP address' history and it seems his choice to blank his talk page is being reverted quite a bit after he blanks it. He's basically playing with those that post on his talk page. ;) &mdash; Gares 13:38, 20 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Well now he has a bunny to play with :D -!!!!

Thanks for the help
Thx for moving my translated page, I didn't know how to do it. =) - - Shikaru Nara  (talk|contribs) 15:13, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

Calendar
Hey bud, is it ok if I steal your Calendar template code? I'll put in proper credit. — Jyro X 19:08, 21 October 2006 (CDT)
 * User:Barek, User:Luobailong and User talk:Auron of Neon do. Although Auron gives no credit... --Xasxas256 21:31, 21 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Sure. Doesn't half travel ;p &mdash; Skuld 02:30, 22 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Got it. Put in the credit in the template itself. :) — Jyro X [[Image:Darkgrin.jpg|25px]] 04:12, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

My builds
That page has been recreated, I added a +del tag but its been removed. As I'm hamstrung but both 1RV and not being an admin I can't do much now except dump it on your doorstep. I've added to your note explaining why My Builds isn't a valid article. Have fun with it, I'm going to bed! --Xasxas256 08:42, 22 October 2006 (CDT)

Ale
Ale Merchant (regardless of namespace) just seems like shameless advertising to me... Didn we formalise some sort of policy or understanding on this issue? --Xasxas256 07:45, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
 * I have no clue what you're talking about, but I'll assume you mean on-wiki advertisement of in-game services. Last decision I remember was to let those be. Main argument was Gem's and Gravewit's advertisements of running services. ~ Nilles (chat) 09:39, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
 * yah, thats the name of my character, aren't I entitled to have a user page like everyone else? How come I can't post my signature next to the stuff i've written or posted? Hardly seems fair. -Ale Merchant
 * Are you User:Am? I just see this happening and its a bit suspect. Even if you've changed your user name, the sig should remain for the OP &mdash; Skuld 12:32, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Yes, that was the sig i used when i first posted it but since i created the user page under a different name i figured it was Ok to update the the sig on the stuff i've posted. No i'm not taking credit for someone elses photo.- Ale Merchant

Wow, looks like you've got a rival
hey, check this out---> Special:Contributions/Defiant Elements. I cant believe it but theres someone out there who can post edits at a similar rate as you!! He wouldn't happen to be a, oh I dont know, say...a Puppet of yours would he? :P&mdash; Azroth    18:19, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Since everyone's sig links to their userpage, the real measure is whose user page has themost pages linked to it. Out of the top 25 most linked to pages, only four are user pages:
 * 6. User:Skuld ‎(2,762 links)
 * 8. User:Karlos ‎(2,011 links)
 * 19. User:PanSola ‎(1,311 links)
 * 21. User:Rainith ‎(1,217 links)
 * All other users have under 1,000. Lets face it, Skuld rules all! --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:26, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Top 100, w00t! --Xasxas256 19:36, 25 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Yeah, Skuld has the most posts, no question there. But what I'm refering too is how quickly a person makes a post.  In the past the speed at which Skuld worked has been scary at times.  But this guy is posting comments, though be it not long ones, extremely qickly as well.  I mean hes only been on the site for about a week, so trying to compare him to anyone with links to his user page is impossible.&mdash; [[Image:Azroth sig.png||builds]] Azroth  [[Image:Azroth sig2.png||talk]]  19:50, 25 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Hmmm, I've managed to comment 1217 times w/o ever really saying anything. :P  --Rainith 20:08, 25 October 2006 (CDT) (1218 now baby)
 * Pssst: this post made it 1,218 ;-) You're way ahead of me (and sneaky, adding that comment after the sig - I never remember to read after the sig).  --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:13, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
 * I'm just hoping to get to 500 without ever making sense. Then User talk:Barek is next on the hitlist! --Xasxas256 20:28, 25 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Congrats for being the user that responds to anything and everything. Somebody make him a userbox. ;) &mdash; Gares 21:32, 25 October 2006 (CDT)