Talk:Mantra of Persistence

I have recently made some tables for this skill for my guild. The tables show the effects of mantra of persistence on the duration of every illusion hex (not including factions skills) at all attribute levels up 0-16, the bottom table includes final hex duration based original duration Vs inspiration. I am unfamiliar with the wiki text formatting so I am unsure of how to convert them, I made these all myself so feel free to use/copy the tables.

Mantra Of Persistence Tables


 * Impressive work! Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it be enough to just plot the increase in hexed duration vs. inspiration rank? After all, there is a fair bit of redudancy in the tables. What I'm envisioning is that you look up the duration at your current Illusion rank for the hex you're interested in, then look in the MoP table to see what the new duration is based on the old duration and the inspiration rank. This has the benefit of being "future-safe", i.e., it works no matter how many new hexes are added. Your thoughts? (By the way, you can sign your comments by typing four tildes, i.e., ~ .) &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 17:17, 25 April 2006 (CDT)

When i started i assumed that the hexes would vary a bit more, by the end i was too stubborn to not do the last few skills, but the last table actually does cover all the possible hex durations. Is there any quick way to get the table to wiki format? --GlintsSecretService 17:34, 25 April 2006 (CDT)


 * If it is valid HTML, you can just paste the source here and it will magically work. Do it here, in the talk page, or in Sandbox, if you're not confident. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 18:01, 25 April 2006 (CDT)

It's a straight percentage increase, why would you need a table to figure out the result? I find the whole thing a bit ridiculous, the only thing I think worth mentionning would be that the final duration is rounded down after increase, the rest is just a stupid multiplication using the progress table. --theeth 19:47, 25 April 2006 (CDT)


 * I agree. No offense to Glint, but I don't like the new table at all.  --68.142.14.16 15:51, 26 April 2006 (CDT)


 * I disagree. The tables are good to figure out the breakpoints due to rounding. 16:07, 26 April 2006 (CDT)