Talk:All dye combinations

Source Reference
It's a great resource. We should ask this Nemesis if he wants it posted here. 148.177.129.213 20:28, 19 October 2005 (EST)
 * I just tried to check the site it was stolen from - it's down due to excess traffic. Hmm. 148.177.129.213 20:30, 19 October 2005 (EST)

Why do you say it's stolen Skuld? --Karlos 22:04, 19 October 2005 (EST)

The information here is exactly the same as the information on the linked site from nemesis, copied and pasted. --Ollj 22:21, 19 October 2005 (EST)

yes skuld 212.158.245.101 22:25, 19 October 2005 (EST)


 * I understand, that in and of itself is not a reason to delete the information. We would delete it if it was placed there without the site's approval. We do not know that right now. Maybe the original author did get their approval. --Karlos 22:45, 19 October 2005 (EST)


 * I've got to agree with Karlos. If the site comes back up (unlikely IMO), or if the original creator asks us to take it down, that's one thing.  But as this site is currently down, I don't see an issue with us saving the info for now.  Better that, than the info being lost to the ether.  --Rainith 01:22, 20 October 2005 (EST)


 * Since this table is just a mathematical generation of combined colors using hex values, this should not be deleted even if the original poster requests it. I could write a program to generate this same table in less than 15 minutes.  This is gruntwork, not actual original thought (not that I don't appreciate the original author's work!). &mdash;Tanaric 14:01, 21 October 2005 (EST)

Dye Remover
Shouldnt there be something here about the combinations using Dye Remover? &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.210.109.33 (talk &bull; contribs) 12:59, August 28, 2006 (CDT).

Source page
seems the page has been down almot a year now, time to remove the link? (will do it if there are no arguments against before i check again in a few days) --Midnight08 15:36, 20 September 2006 (CDT)