GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Warwick (2)

Warwick (talk &bull; contribs)
I figured that since hell was gonna apply, i might as well. if you want to check my contribs, check on the button on my signature. I follow the policies to the letter and know them, since i was bored and i read them =P -- Warwick (Talk ) (Contr. ) 18:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Since its me thats applying, i accept! -- Warwick (Talk ) (Contr. ) 18:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  Go for it, your contribs are always valid. RT | Talk 19:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * /ishappy that somone voted for him --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk ) (Contr. ) 19:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1)  I like people who are funny. and cool. you are have good intelligence too. --[[Image:Feardrake Sig.jpg|19px]] Feardrake. 19:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Even though your time on this Wiki may be short... I feel by looking over your contribs, that you are an active player and supporter of this wiki.  With the shorthandedness of admins currently around here, it would be beneficial to the rest of the site to have as active of a member for the role.  (and I was thinking about voting neutral, just because you have way too many user boxes) [[Image:Isk8.png]]Isk8 20:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Many of which are mine I might point out.--[[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg]]igathrash Talk^Cont 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Most of them I've seen on other GW related wiki's userpages... and they are alot older than you. --[[Image:Feardrake Sig.jpg|19px]] Feardrake. 20:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, most of them Are his, since i stole about 300 userboxes from him =/ --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk ) (Contr. ) 20:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * GT was talking that many of those userboxes are his (and Warw stole a bunch of my userboxes too :O ) --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]] -- (s)talkpage 20:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * when i app'd i was pretty sure i wasnt gonna get adminship. I was probably right xD --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Talk ) (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Contr. ) 20:08, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) You enforce the policies. You help around the wiki. You revert vandals constantly. Yet, I still believe that you have not been here long enough to get administrative duties. Give it a few more months, however, and this vote may very well change.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 18:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) You stole every single one of my userboxes without even dropping me a note on my talk page, I don't think I can trust you in a position of power when you have such lenient morals as of now.--[[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg]]<font color="Black">igathrash  Talk^Cont 19:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * is that really a good reason to oppose? =/ --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Talk ) (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Contr. ) 19:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't consider you trustworthy, based on your previous actions to both me and Vipermagi, so yes it is valid.--[[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg]]<font color="Black">igathrash Talk^Cont 19:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Lol. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Talk ) (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Contr. ) 19:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * As my theater instructor says "You are always auditioning."--[[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg]]<font color="Black">igathrash Talk^Cont 19:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Call me irrational ,but I don't feel good about the idea of giving warwick sysop privileges at the moment. Here, there's the assumption that his perception on the matter is consensus enough, and he was forced to back down after various people disagreed. The pessimistic side of me says that if Warwick were an admin, it would have just been deleted and left at that, and looking for consensus on an issue like that is what I would have expected. This one is a bit personal, so I might be being biased, but warning someone for RVing vandalism seems a bit ridiculous, as well as the fact that he didn't notice the edits reverted were different entirely.  This shows a lack of knowledge on policies on the wiki, although I screwed up there as well, and I think since then Warwick has made an effort to improve that. If that seemed all a bit negative, with the qualities described in Marco's vote, and some more experience, Warwick could have the potential to be a sysop. Lord of all tyria 19:54, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Talk ) (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Contr. ) 19:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Sorry, I think at the moment the wiki needs someone a bit more "experienced". --Mr Ex Vandal 20:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Hah, marco you were wrong! Haha! you said he'd vote for support! You owe me 10k! --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Talk ) (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Contr. ) 20:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow.. just wow [[Image:Isk8.png]]Isk8 20:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow what? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Talk ) (<font face="vivaldi" size="3">Contr. ) 20:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Yeah I don't feel like voting anything else. --<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="green">Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 18:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Only here since october RT </B>| Talk 18:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)