User talk:Cwong

stop posting builds on the premade build page, that is not the place for it --Lemming64  17:40, 7 January 2007 (CST)
 * More helpfully, that article documents the old premade build feature that used to be in the game, and is not meant for displaying new builds. If you want to post a build, make a new article according to . — Biscuits (talk [[Image:Biscuit.png]] contribs) 03:56, 9 January 2007 (CST)

Vandalism
Please stop vandalising favored builds. Zerak-Tul 21:49, 13 January 2007 (CST)

Reverts
Please, stop reverting Build:N/Mo Solo SS Necromancer. By doing so you are breaking GW:1RV. Either discuss it on the talk page of the article, or bring it to the attention of an admin. But whatever you do, stop reverting! --Dirigible 22:13, 13 January 2007 (CST)
 * About your changes to Build:N/Mo Solo SS Necromancer. I took a look through the history of that article. It seems that the article was already voted as favoured. If you think your choice of skills and attributes is better, please bring it up on the talk page of the article for discussion, or submit your version as a new build. It's just inappropriate to change a build which has been voted as favoured without discussing it with other editors first, as that would simply put a huge questionmark on the purpose of the community having their say on the different builds before they become favoured. The same with Build:Mo/any 55hp Solo Monk. This build also has been voted as favoured, and for this as well, please propose your changes in the talk page of that article first, before actually submitting them. Huge section removals like you did for the Variants section can easily be considered as vandalism, so be careful. The same with Build:E/Mo Pyro Support Caster. A favoured build getting changed without community discussion isn't acceptable. Hope that makes sense. Let me know if you have any questions, and please, make sure you discuss things with the other editors before making such huge changes. Thanks. --Dirigible 22:36, 13 January 2007 (CST)