User talk:Skuld14148

N/Me Heavy Degen/Regen
Hey why did u delete this build? I dont see the problem with it although im probably missing something. Bbbballballball 22:06, 29 November 2006 (CST)


 * I put it back. Purging the crappy forgotten ones, this one seems not to be forgotten :) &mdash; Skuld 03:42, 30 November 2006 (CST)


 * He He, I get it. Sir On The Edge 16:58, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Build:P/W Flame Bonder‎‎
Hi Skuld, would you take a look at this build, please? I ask about your opinion. Thx. Crowley 10:00, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Ranger Build to delete
Merged Build:R/any Enchanter Executioner to Build:R/Me Melandru's Arrows Ranger. Please delete the prior. Thanks.--  Vallen Frostweaver  16:53, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Archives?
Can you look at my talk page and tell me if I archived it right?

Thanks, --Blastedt(Talk) 17:37, 30 November 2006 (CST)


 * Yes, very nice &mdash; Skuld 17:38, 30 November 2006 (CST)
 * Thanks--Blastedt(Talk) 17:05, 1 December 2006 (CST)

N/Mo Grenth's Best Archive?
I was intrigued by this build a couple of days back but haven't had the time to make a template for it. I went to look for it and saw that it was now deleted. Is there an archive for this build at all or does anyone remember it? MrFunke 9:13, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Main page's bug.. again..
Hi! You wanted to know if it happen again.. and.. it did it..

On the main page.. the user name, talk page and contributions is not from the logged user ("Acidic Thought" in place of me), happened just now when writing this.. Corsaire 09:33, 1 December 2006 (CST)


 * Weird. I wonder if it is some glitch with the new cache or whatever Fyren did &mdash; Skuld 09:50, 1 December 2006 (CST)


 * So.. this is no big deal.. forget it.. :D Corsaire 17:05, 1 December 2006 (CST)

S&F
You might want to look over Style_and_formatting/Unique_items. You've been here long enough to know S&F and you seem to only want to change one unique item. I'm curious to know why you reverted my revert of your edit *cough* GW:1RV. :P &mdash; Gares 10:11, 1 December 2006 (CST)


 * Fixed the S&F. I've done that to a load already ^^ Screw 1RV :p &mdash; Skuld 10:16, 1 December 2006 (CST)


 * I reverted your S&F edit since there was no discussion on the change ;) &mdash; Gares 10:19, 1 December 2006 (CST)


 * Mistake! :p &mdash; Skuld 10:19, 1 December 2006 (CST)

Bad answer
Hey Skuld you should answer better to me. Why are you against me? Glenn 15:33, 1 December 2006 (CST)


 * I am not. What sort of a stupid question is why is anet in favour of axes? Its a balanced game!! -.- &mdash; Skuld 15:35, 1 December 2006 (CST)
 * So why almost everyone uses an axe rather than a sword?And it's not only for this that i wrote this to you. Glenn 15:43, 1 December 2006 (CST)

About your last thing you posted about me
for the last time; i DONT CARE. jeez your worse than my mother. if i really gave a rats ass about ANYTHING you two numbskulls said to me, i would have rearranged all of my pages to fit YOUR likings. so, seriously, just go away, i didnt ask for your imput on anything. and being agressive is just how i am, why else would i be a pure assassin? you can go ahead and post another ridiculous message, and chances are ill reply with an equally ridiculous message. ive already lost interest in this, but i cant let it slide, y'know? so go ahead. make my day.

-soul <--- notice i "accidentally" forgot my signiture

What the...?
Did you delete my builds?

--Soul of Seraphs 15:53, 1 December 2006 (CST)

* 16:06, 29 November 2006 Skuld (Talk | contribs) deleted Build:W/Mo Sheathed Sword
Why did you delete this? I wante dto use the build, then it was deleted. :(


 * There you go: User:24.61.209.66/W/Mo Sheathed Sword. It was an embarassment that anything so awful could get favoured. Trying to clear some of the wiki's bad name :) &mdash; Skuld 17:33, 1 December 2006 (CST)

Ancient Lodestone
Found drop collectable item. Have worn myself out looking for a way to add it to the items list since it does not show there.

Item is called: Ancient Lodestone. Look likes regular lodestone images. Found from the little beetle elementals in the Holdings of Chokhin area.



Including image for editting here.

Sorry cannot figure out how to add it to the database for collectable items.--ShmEk 20:59, 2 December 2006 (CST)
 * Ancient Lodestone: there you go. Feel free to expand the stub. ~ Nilles (msg) 03:38, 3 December 2006 (CST)

W/any_Cleave_PvE_Soldier
Hullo! You've just taken off the Gen Res on the above built. I would have thought that a Gen res was a permitted choice as you could pack a Monk/Rt (or even Paragon) hard res, given this is a PvE build. --JP 04:20, 3 December 2006 (CST)


 * Generic res is never a permitted choice :-/ And people shouldn't die &mdash; Skuld 04:21, 3 December 2006 (CST)


 * Yes they are, I made a rezmer with Tahl, a saccer with Olias, and MM with Master of Whispers. --Silk Weaker 04:23, 3 December 2006 (CST)


 * Let me add a note, if you wish to make minion factory, add generic res of choice ;P &mdash; Skuld 04:25, 3 December 2006 (CST)

Tiny bit of Criticism.
'Ello, you put an unfavored vote on Build:D/W_Tactical_Scythe with the reason "Steady Stance". I can see why you've suggested it (more energy gain) but i'd appreciate a reason why you've voted for unfavored. Thanks. - Mcmullen 05:45, 4 December 2006 (CST)
 * Sorry, a W/X with steady stance and the drunken/desperate blows is better than the d/w I meant. You get critical chop for one, and vim sucks now &mdash; Skuld 05:49, 4 December 2006 (CST)

Hiya Skuld
Wanna throw a little bit of what you got at my newest build? Build:R/E Fire and Ice is the name. Even a "first glance" would be heplful to kickstart things. Baron 09:29, 4 December 2006 (CST)

R/Me Ether Thief
t_t <=== is that a good thing or a bad thing? :D
 * Bad. Whats the point? :) &mdash; Skuld 13:17, 4 December 2006 (CST)

Article: Cynn
There is currently a dispute going on in Talk:Cynn about an edit I made. The edit in particular was removing a line that stated clipping the character model would reveal Cynn's thong, and a picture of said action. Please kindly resolve this fight :) --Blastedt(Talk) 15:14, 4 December 2006 (CST)
 * lol, you guys don't have anything more important to do? ~ Nilles (msg) 16:05, 4 December 2006 (CST)

Temporary Blocking
So, your answer to an argument is censorship? Maybe you should talk with your friend Auron and hear what he has to say about "History". I'll edit out the Thinking makes head hurts if you wish. But the truth is, you have no arguments to make and no answers to give. So all you're left with is showing off admin privileges....NightAngel 13:13, 5 December 2006 (CST)
 * Go away. &mdash; Skuld 13:14, 5 December 2006 (CST)
 * Skuld did not ban you id I'm correct, he just put a request for ban on your user page. That means that another admin must either ban yo uor remove the ban request. That's what a normal user would do and what Skuld as a respectable admin does. He did not use any powers against you, but asked others to make the decision. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 13:24, 5 December 2006 (CST)
 * Even if you disagree that's no reason to harass (statement to NightAngel). Sir On The Edge 13:26, 5 December 2006 (CST)
 * Skuld did not ban you - he placed a ban request, this does not require admin powers. As the ban request is on NightAgnel's account, further discussion should be redirected to User_talk:NightAngel. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:36, 5 December 2006 (CST)
 * See comment on my page. Apparently I tried to prove my point in the wrong manner. It's a pity, because I think it's a valid point - criticism should be constructive and use arguments that make sense and lead to a conclusion. That allows said criticism to be critiqued and deconstructed. No arguments - no debate - no dialetic - no conclusion. All we are left with are screaming matches. NightAngel 14:09, 5 December 2006 (CST)