Template talk:TitlesNavBox

Colors
I appreciate this NavBox (it was a good idea to split the Title article) but my eyes strongly object against using blue and red together in one box. I would find a setting like

or

less harmfful to the eyes. --MRA 08:27, 5 December 2006 (CST)


 * /Shrug. I don't see a big difference to the current version, but I don't care much. Go ahead, you have my blessing (as the one who created the first version). --[[Image:TurningL sml.gif|Tetris L]] 11:11, 5 December 2006 (CST)

disagree with Revert
if you look at wikipedia navboxes some are as large as that edit (we are not wikipedia but still we use there navbox style), but there is need for clarity and my edit which was reverted without discussion presented clarity in these boxes. --Jamie  17:14, 17 January 2007 (CST)


 * As you say, we are not Wikipedia, so while our boxes originated as variations of theirs, what Wikipedia does is irrelevant. Next look at all the rest of our nav boxes, they are all compact and minimalist, this change made this one's style completely different from the rest.  Also with this change, at 1024x768 here at work, the nav box was close to the same size as the article of some of the title articles, we don't need that much fluff in the box.  --Rainith 18:47, 17 January 2007 (CST)

Need to split
the box has grown too big for a simple alphabetical order to be useful. I recommend a split, either into different sections on the same template by nature, or each "type" having their own sub-templates. -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 21:08, 8 May 2008 (UTC)