User talk:Skuld14148

new +

Plase move it back
Please, move back to Mo/E Solo G Its not made for Ghial farming only, but for farming MANY boss's, and since its my build I think I can name it what ever I want And I name it Solo G, that is the smallest thing I can expect.
 * And this is a wiki, anyone may move it as they see fit. It is not "your" build, do remember that. Moved back to original name &mdash; Skuld 12:59, 2 September 2006 (CDT)

Deletion / Redictect
Just currious? Why are my user pages getting redicted / deleted? Your killing me here XD! I was editing them and correcting them and now I can't even continue to fix them. --Vulpes Foxnik 14:04, 3 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Oh wait, I think I see why,It's because they aren't being made in my User:Vulpes_Foxnik/ folder, right? --[[Image:Vulpes_Foxnik.png]]Vulpes Foxnik 14:06, 3 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Right, Skuld moved your stuff to User:Vulpes Foxnik/My Builds, User:Vulpes Foxnik/My Characters, and User:Vulpes Foxnik/My Pets since if you don't put "User:" in front of it, it's not part of your user space, just a page in the main article space that starts with your name. --Fyren 14:10, 3 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Well I used the Template to make the links in a  on my User page, hoping that it would use the tile of the page as User:Vulpes_Foxnik rather than Vulpes_Foxnik. Sorry I'm new. Thanks for the help though. --[[Image:Vulpes_Foxnik.png]]Vulpes Foxnik 14:13, 3 September 2006 (CDT)

unprotect
Can you please go to Category:Build stubs, unprotect it and add. Thx --Xeeron 06:18, 4 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Done &mdash; Skuld 06:21, 4 September 2006 (CDT)

Your Offer
"Token, tell me when you're doing a build and i'd gladly help you with it, you seem to care a lot"
 * I'll take you up on that. My most recent build is the Rt/any Spirit Nuker.  If you could playtest that one and give any suggestions, I'd appreciate it.  I don't know if there is anything else that I can do with it at this time, but some fresh perspective is always nice.  I'm going to clean up the formatting for that one when I make my next set of notes.
 * Also, just so you know, I am going to be posting a build soon called "Any/R Dire Pet Evolver." I've seen a lot of people asking around the wiki about evolving a dire pet as a secondary, but no real solution.  I still have a lot of testing to do before I post it, though.  It will probably be similar to Tank Master, but I'll have to do some tweaking to account for the lack of Expertise.  I'm going to try writing it as a single build with all ranger skills, but that might not be possible.   It may require 7 (or, after Nightfall, 9!) variations on the same page.  Any recommendations on how to approach writing that one would be great, too.  I don't know of any other builds that are "Any/XX"--Token Cleric 18:17, 4 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Ok i'll give it a go in a min. Do you mean Guide to evolving a Dire Pet/Builds? &mdash; Skuld 01:25, 5 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Actually, yes. That is perfect.  I'm starting with a W/R, which I see in still in need of a build.  I'll also insert the Tank Master as the Ranger Primary build, and put a link to that guide in the Tank Master's article.  It's perfect for that purpose.  Thanks a lot!--Token Cleric 12:09, 5 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Wow. I just had a "Holy crap, Batman!" moment.  I don't need to do any more testing with the W/R Dire Pet Evolver; the combination that I stumbled upon this evening works flawlessly.  Check it out at the link above when you get a chance.--Token Cleric 21:50, 5 September 2006 (CDT)

Armor Icons.
Skuld, the reason why I was uploading 'blank' images for the Armor icons is because it is not possible for ther to be one for Armor Function boxes in Factions. It was because the icon boxes for the Male and female sections were often much longer because of the lack of the file and takes away from the page overal usability. Their either needs to be an option for no Inventory Icons of the options on the function armor sections, or there needs to be a Default. What I made was a blank Default for the Icons by using the empty character inventory slots. It would be better if the template had the ability to handle a no image case. If you had a better Idea of what to use as the symbol for the Undefinable armor icons, go ahead. Otherwise I am going to upload the ones I created. --Vulpes Foxnik 21:41, 5 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Contact user:PanSola and suggest your changes :) Best to get it fixed than use a replacxement 212.158.245.101 05:48, 6 September 2006 (CDT)

A Me/R eh?
Did you like my R/Me build? I didn't think much of it, i just added up some combos. It works best with Druid's Armour. I'm not sure about Me/R...I think you could do pretty much the same thing. Whats fun is using Serpent's Quickness and then spamming Conjure Phantasm. Why not add it to Apply Poison?

U blocked my IP! :( Lol it was being random and deleting stuff. Leeroythefeared 14:07, 7 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Whats your IP?.. On the other note, mesmers can cast faster and have a larger energy pool, they're designed for that sort of thing, you seem to have your classes backwards! &mdash; Skuld 14:10, 7 September 2006 (CDT)


 * 62.254.32.23, see Krytan Armor's history.

Yes, a Me/R would work better probably. On the other hand, i prefer the armour of the ranger. Leeroythefeared 08:40, 9 September 2006 (CDT)

User page not User talk page
Opps my mistake, you corrected just before I tried to... Thanks --JP 16:47, 8 September 2006 (CDT)
 * NP :) &mdash; Skuld 16:51, 8 September 2006 (CDT)

Currently Testing the Viability of…
Hey, could you just take a glance at the above named section on my page and just give me a quick review on my discussion page for each one? Basically this is my personal solution to the lack of comments in the untested section (I agree there should be more, but I'm getting tired of all the arguing about it, people just keep repeating the same things and nothing really gets done/decided). My hope is that by doing this and then asking people for feedback, not votes, I can get the builds perfected before the untested section and save the testers a lot of grief. So far it seems to be working, and I look forward to your help. Thanks in advance.--Azroth 22:46, 8 September 2006 (CDT) PS-Please read the previous discussions for each one as they may answer any questions that you have about the related build.

N/Rt Undead Priest
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that you had too much to drink this morning. You deleted this build for the following reason: "Too similar to existing MM builds, the only variations - ritualist healing skills - don't warrent a full new page.)". After reading that I thought I surely must have missed the apparently "similiar" MM build while checking before I posted. But upon searching through the maybe 10 Tested&approved necro builds, I found no MM builds much less any builds that were "similiar". While I am perfectly aware of the General MM guide I don't feel that just because my build features two minion skills that it should have been deleted so hastily and without warning (There was no mark for dele. when I looked in on it this morning)just because there were a couple of similiar skills, the way to play the build was completely different than an actual MM build. So in closing I'd like to say "wtf"-Onlyashadow 13:57, 11 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Huh, I was clearing out stubs and it looked pretty similar to the N/any one. I'll put it back for you &mdash; Skuld 14:07, 11 September 2006 (CDT)

Apology accepted.-Onlyashadow 14:10, 11 September 2006 (CDT)

Request
Think you could sort this out for me dude? A/W_Unstable_Wound (I changed it, added cause of A/R_Unstable_Wound ~Shadou  05:54, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
 * It's cool, when you add the +del tag it's added to the articles to be deleted category and our admins go through them periodically, no need to message an admin for it ;) --Xasxas256 05:58, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Ah, Didn't realise - sorry~Shadou 06:32, 12 September 2006 (CDT)

Thanks
Sorry didn't see it. You're right it is very similar. How do I go about deleting mine?
 * Done it for you &mdash; Skuld 10:14, 12 September 2006 (CDT)

Return
Was my "note"-addition on the page regarding Return superfluous? Just checking. --CoRrRan 10:31, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
 * I removed it because it was well.. obvious ;) &mdash; Skuld 10:32, 12 September 2006 (CDT)
 * OK, fine by me, although I had to check this for myself before I was convinced. --CoRrRan 10:37, 12 September 2006 (CDT)