Talk:Way of the Fox

Does this skill turn your arrows into homing missiles and/or does it make it so they cannot be evaded and blocked?


 * That's a very interesting question, I don't believe anyone has tested it. Kessel 23:32, 17 June 2006 (CDT)
 * I believe Blindness, Reckless Haste still missess but dont know if it uses up the attacks. My guess is it does. User:Anryla 24:27, 22 June 2006 (GMT+1)
 * I tested this just now. While blinded, your attacks miss as usual, and they still count towards the Way of the Fox. -Greven 14:00, 22 June 2006 (CDT)
 * So I'm going to assume that arrows that miss the target because the target is moving use up hits, since it seems that basically everything uses up hits. Kessel 04:08, 23 June 2006 (CDT)

Uh, is the box wrong? Looking at this skill in-game now, and 10 DA yields 27 seconds, correct, but 4 attacks not 5. Kessel 00:23, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Fixed it for up to 16, but always feel free to edit anything you've verified as wrong. --68.142.14.34 01:43, 4 July 2006 (CDT)

This+barrage cant all arrows be blocked or only the first one?
 * It's likley to be used up on a "per arrow" basis.--JP 10:15, 9 February 2007 (CST)


 * They should improve this skill so your next 1...5 Attack Skills cannot be blocked. --Lann 09:32, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
 * That is not true... It blocks all attacks. Attack skills are a subgroup of attacks.  If it "Attack Skills cannot be blocked", then it would not give the benefit of normal attacks.Isk8 10:01, 29 July 2007 (CDT)
 * If it activated on Attack skills only then this skill would not be wasted on normal attacks, to balance the recharge time, which is what he is saying. -- Xeon 13:11, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Definitely agree with that, I also think rech should be lowered. Maybe 5-1/4-30 or 5-1/4-25  with at least 1...5 attacks.  Blocks are just too easy to get and screw up sins too much to make their only non-hex counter to it have 45 rech. 76.102.172.202 17:59, 9 September 2007 (CDT)

Does this activate twice with dual attacks? Btw I vote to put up a lame tag for this. Its just unuseable.--The Gates Assassin 15:50, 24 September 2007 (CDT)