Talk:H4X0R Tribal Blade of 13371NG

Maybe Darnalthor should have made the page User:Darnalthor/H4X0R Tribal Blade of 13371NG to make clear this belongs to his user page, but in any case this article shouldn't have been deleted, especially not without prior discussion. The reason Rainith gave for deleting it was "No leet speek plz". But Darnalthor, who uses the article on his user page, obviously isn't serious about it. Quite the opposite, he is mocking the l33t-speakers. --Fisherman's Friend 14:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Had Darnalthor made this page as User:Darnalthor/H4X0R Tribal Blade of 13371NG then I would not have deleted it. However PanSola marked it for deletion and as it was obviously not an appropriate page as created, I do not feel that deleting it was inapropriate at all. --Rainith 14:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * As an addendum, I see no issue with deleting obvious problem pages like this one, or say if there was an article created as Shit Sword without waiting the standard time period. Then there are pages where there may be merit to them (like Leader which has had a delete tag for a while, but there is an active discussion in its talk page) that should have a waiting period before they are deleted.  --Rainith 14:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Rainith is correct in my opinion. As I, Fyren and Tanaric (I believe) have stated before, we believe it is well within the powers of an admin to delete such trivial stuff without waiting 24 hours or any such stuff. If we wish to make it a rule that no article (no matter how obvious) should be deleted without a day's notice, then we sould vote on such a proposal in the Policies talk page. --Karlos 23:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)