Category talk:Users/OblivionWiki

Deletion?
I fail to see this categories pointlessness. It's just another harmless users category which some users from the community will use and others won't. I would say keep it as it is. --MRA 15:13, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * This category is completely outside of the Guild Wars fansite reason for existance of GuildWiki. I really don't think we should be documenting user categories for other wikis (even if this one is in the same parent domain).  You can easilly go over to OblivionWiki:Special:Listusers if you want a list of OblivionWiki users, or view OblivionWiki:Special:Recentchanges for users with recent changes over there. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 09:52, 15 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Seconding pointless vote. Why is this category even in this wiki? Kessel 09:58, 15 September 2006 (CDT)

Hmm, I'm still not convinced (mostly because I see this as harmless). Anyways, you should be aware that there is also a Category:Users/HammerWiki which should be handled analogously. --MRA 12:51, 17 September 2006 (CDT)
 * What criteria should exist for this sort of social networking inclusion within GuildWiki? Prior user categories such as thos for PvE, PvP, or language, etc have had at least a GuildWars related excuse (even if it was sometimes thin).  But these clearly have no relationship to GuildWars.  Should we also allow this sort of category for users of Wikipedia, Wiktionary, and WoW-Wiki?  What about other forums, such as GW Online, GW Guru, or even myspace.com or Slashdot.org?  While the wiki does have definite social aspects, it's not our reason to exist - so what limits, if any, should be placed on this sort of thing?  --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:53, 17 September 2006 (CDT)
 * I don't care a whole lot either way, but I suppose I slightly favor deletion. --Fyren 23:30, 17 September 2006 (CDT)

Harmless. In user space. And it does cover stuff the same parent domain. People have all kinds of silly things on their user page, and I think an easy reference of OblivioWiki fols may be useful to some. &mdash; 130.58 (talk) 23:45, 17 September 2006 (CDT)