User talk:Skuld14148

new +

Blocking
I know we've just rid ourselves of Penalties for abuse but 1 week for making a pointless page? Harsh man harsh! --Xasxas256 07:15, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I usually do 1-3 days for vandalism of existing and 1 week for creating vandalism pages, too much? &mdash; Skuld 07:16, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I reckon, I mean it was just one off gibberish, I mean if it was racist or done multiple times after being warned that's different. Well you're the admin but yeah I do reckon possibly a bit harsh. --Xasxas256 07:18, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I'm not an admin, but yes, I think so. Remember that many of such edits may just be new/young/stupid users trying stuff out. Give them the benefit of the doubt and only hammer hard on the real vandals, imho. -- [[Image:Bishop_icon2.png]] Bishop [ rap|con ] 07:20, 8 August 2006 (CDT)

Ok, 3 days now &mdash; Skuld 07:22, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I personally don't think that any penalty needs to be handed down on somebody who vandalises an article as a once off. --Xasxas256 07:29, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * It's more to ward them off doing it again and leave an entry in the block log for future reference if they do it again. If someone creates a page as their only contribution then it gets deleted, their contribution log is empty &mdash; Skuld 07:31, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I agree with your sentiment, Skuld (although I'd most likely just block for 1 hour because it serves all those purposes equally well without being as harsh). -- [[Image:Bishop_icon2.png]] Bishop [ rap|con ] 07:33, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Never knew it was possible to block for below one day. Default list goes 1, 3, week, 2 weeks. Knew you could set custom but though it had to be in days+ :o &mdash; Skuld 07:37, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Yep I like 1 hour, also I think if it's just testing/gibberish testing type edits then we should put a note saying welcome, please don't vandalise, use the Sandbox, you've been blocked for 1 hour blah blah. 1 hour should give them a chance to read it. --Xasxas256 07:39, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I'd agree. More than 1 day for anything that might just be a new user playing around (stupidly) is harsh.  1 hour is probably fine.  Any kind of commercial ads or racism, etc., go ahead and bring a gigantic hammer down.  --JoDiamonds 15:34, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * huh, I wonder if we have different settings. The default durations available on my screen are 2 hours, 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, infinite, or other. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:55, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I guess I'm a jerk. I'll do 1 day for something trivial, but usually a week for anything else. &mdash;Tanaric 17:49, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * One week doesn't seem too harsh. People won't die if they lose a week, and they sure will refrain from screwing up in the future too. /cheer Tanaric :)  --ShmEk 23:23, 17 August 2006 (CDT)

back already?
just saw an edit by you in recent changes, that must be the fastest vacation on record. ;) --Honorable Sarah 16:06, 18 August 2006 (CDT)

Happy Birthday!!
<3 <3 <3 Foo 20:16, 18 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Well done mate, a quick Wikipedia search shows that drinking and driving are still out but AoC is in, so have fun with whatever you get up to! ;) --Xasxas256 00:48, 19 August 2006 (CDT)
 * rofl! Foo 03:40, 19 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Xas is either taking this too seriously or has really lost his pants. Anyway, Happy Birthday Skuld! --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 04:35, 19 August 2006 (CDT)

Ty ^^ I'm nearly old :p &mdash; Skuld 05:45, 20 August 2006 (CDT)
 * So what did you get up to!?!! ;) --Xasxas256 06:01, 20 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Nothing yet, recovering from jetlag ;( &mdash; Skuld 06:02, 20 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Sorry I missed the party, but Happy Birthday! &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 23:28, 22 August 2006 (CDT)

Scrutinizing the scribe
Hey Skuld, do you have that topic on GWG that mocked the scribe? --Jamie  06:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 'fraid not :( Looked through 7 pages of riverside and didn't catch my eye, google didn't return anything either &mdash; Skuld 06:50, 21 August 2006 (CDT)

Ban
I don't think he deserved a ban. That seemed like pressing the wiki edit toolbar randomly to test tihngs. Atleast it seems so from the delete summary. -- (talk) 06:49, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Save button is clearly marked &mdash; Skuld 06:50, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Skuld is faster and meaner than you! Being serious for a sec I'm probably leaning towards Gem but I'm just a softy. Sometimes. --Xasxas256 06:52, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Sandbox, user space, preview, all useful for testing. main namespace isn't a playground. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 10:44, 21 August 2006 (CDT)

Dark Apostasy
Your new assassin build looks nice, be sure to Build it, when you've completed it ;)~Shadou 10:08, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Thanks :) I have all the stuff unlocked but I want to test on my PvE 'sin, need to get around to buying another mask and gloves and getting to Amatz Basin &mdash; Skuld 11:02, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Have a play with the build on my Userpage if you are interested in doing some _real_ damage, like a proper 'sin ;] ~Shadou 08:24, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
 * With 12 daggers?.. &mdash; Skuld 08:17, 23 August 2006 (CDT)
 * He makes up for it by having 235 attribute points. --68.142.14.35 08:37, 23 August 2006 (CDT)

Nightfall Builds
could you comment on the disposition of nightfall builds here? --Honorable Sarah 16:51, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
 * hmmm ... moved to here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:44, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
 * bump. I'm asking several admins to take a look and voice opinions. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:50, 23 August 2006 (CDT)

out of process deletion of refund point
GuildWiki talk:Criteria for deletion