Talk:Unique items list (Nightfall)

Names of Items in lists rules Thank you all for your assistance in filling this item list. --Mgrinshpon 09:44, 28 October 2006 (CDT)
 * If the item has it's type in the name (ex Morrob's Axe), no NOT type "{Weapon type)" after it.
 * If the item does NOT have the weapon type in it's name (ex The Lifegiver), then please add it's weapon type after it's name (ex (Staff).
 * If the profession has only 1 type of weapon with no offhands (ex Dervishes), then there is no need to add the weapon type after.
 * If the type of the bow is not stated in the name (ex Flatbow, Longbow, etc), please add it after in the aformentioned form.


 * While this is a valiant attempt, most of this is common sense. Users that are not active or making one-shot posts usually follow by example on the article page or place what they think is best and others come along and clean it up. Your rules seem to be aimed at an audience that will most likely not even check the talk page before adding a name, nor check it afterwards. Not saying its the wrong thing to do, if one person sees it and learned something from it, kudos. But in all honesty, one sweep through the list and a user can format it correctly. Still, a pretty good assessment of how we format the unique items list. &mdash; Gares 10:34, 28 October 2006 (CDT)

Ok, nightfall released. Suggest screenshots as proof of greens and to protect against spam (mostly the second one). --Mgrinshpon 06:47, 27 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Green confirmed nice job Nazlakh -- Tomoko


 * No no no, like, make a new page for em. --Mgrinshpon 10:17, 27 October 2006 (CDT) EDIT: Nevermind, still protected. --Mgrinshpon 10:18, 27 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Please make that page yourself.. not quite a wiki genius... -- Tomoko


 * Making page of Hassin now.. -- Tomoko


 * No biggie, I did it. --Mgrinshpon 10:30, 27 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Check again.. you've made the page of the Shield i did it of the boss.. -- Tomoko


 * I disagree with the proof shots. We didn't do it for Factions and I don't think that's going to change. GW:AGF &mdash; Gares 12:55, 27 October 2006 (CDT)


 * I agree w/Gares. If there are questions/disagreements about an item's stats, then we should get a stats pic for the talk page to settle the argument.  Stats images should stay out of the item pages.  --Rainith 13:22, 27 October 2006 (CDT)

The formatting is a little wanky. I suggest 3-3-4 style (W, R, and Mo first row, N, Me, and E second, the rest 4th). --Mgrinshpon 13:01, 27 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Well, I made it basically into what it should look like except the dervish box is off. Someone will just have to fix it, I admit, I'm no wiki genius. --Mgrinshpon 13:05, 27 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Actually, scratch that. I fixed it. --Mgrinshpon 13:15, 27 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Format looks good now -- Tomoko

Unverified greens

 * Modti's Desperation (staff): 20HSR, 20HSR curses x2, health +30

I think we should keep track of unverified greens in the talk page. I saw this one in trade chat. -- Gordon Ecker 01:59, 29 October 2006 (CDT)