Talk:Eye of the North (outpost)

Article Naming
Instead of "Eye of the North (town)," shouldn't this be "Eye of the North (outpost)?" It seems more fitting with previous naming schemes.--Ninjatek 18:51, 24 August 2007 (CDT)


 * No, because Eye of the North has the Town icon on the map like Ascalon and LA, rather than the Outpost icon like Warcamp or something --Gimmethegepgun 18:57, 24 August 2007 (CDT)


 * If going to rename, would suggest using "Eye of the North (Location)". --Wolfie [[Image:Wolfie_sig.jpg|19px]] (talk|contribs) 01:45, 27 August 2007 (CDT)


 * The latest update changed it to the outpost icon. -- Gordon Ecker 01:12, 30 August 2007 (CDT)


 * Maybe we should wait until GW:EN is officially out. --Heelz 01:15, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

"Location" is used for Outposts that become Missions, so we have 2 focused articles ("My Home (Location)" and "My Home (Mission)"). Now, considering the NPCs and services offered in EotN, it should be a town.PvEreanor 07:55, 30 August 2007 (CDT)

What the hell is this place?
For place which is also the title of the entire expansion, this place somehow manages to avoid all attempts at explaining what the hell it is, and why it is there other than some excuse for a plot device of a scrying pool and the hall of monuments. It otherwise serves no purpose and isn't even referenced by anyone outside of it. --Ckal Ktak 15:55, 18 September 2007 (CDT)


 * And to add, you barely ARE there, at all. There isn't much to do, it's small, it's circular, I use many comma's, and it's a thorn in the eye (pun intended). Anyhow, it's a tower wich was built sometime, and the humans inhabited it once they fled from the fearsome (weak) Charr in the east. Yay, stupid plotline ftw. BTW: Jora tells about it just outside Boreal Station! :P --84.24.206.123 16:04, 18 September 2007 (CDT)