GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Shadowcrest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Shadowcrest (talk &bull; contribs)
I really think that shadow should be RFA'd because he's an outstanding contributor, and hardly any of his edits have been argued with. He's got "Admin Stuffz" and is generally an all-round awesome contributor. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 23:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
 * I accept the nomination. I try quite hard to help the community out, and being an admin could only help that effort. --Shadowcrest 00:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Shadowcrest was made an administrator on Thursday, March 27, 2008.

Support

 * 1) All things considered, I believe Shadow would make a good admin. However, considering how many Rfa's are active right now, is it really a good idea to add another? [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 00:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) We need more admins, tonights events have convinced me of that. Shadow's a good candidate.[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]]Entrea Sumatae  [Talk]  04:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Really? Hmm. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 18:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) The more the merrier RT | Talk  13:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) He's reliable and a nice guy, definitely support. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 14:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) He's well trusted, sensible, humorous (always a plus :P), and is nearly constantly on, and I certainly think he'll make a good admin.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 02:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Haven't seen you around often :| [[Image:ShadyGuy.jpg]] 15:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This is the first time you've logged in since February 29th... it might not be Shadow's fault. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 16:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Finding it very difficult to place a vote here... I think Shadow is definitely a great contributor, there is no question there. He has been a member of this wiki since July, made almost 1000 edits in that timeframe, alot of which is helping out in articles, assisting others on articles talk pages, and reverting vandalism.  I don't recall ever seeing him getting into arguments, or having issues with NPA's.  Definitely has been more active as of lately (>500 edits in the past 2 weeks.)  I'm sure as will probably be said by Entropy or Gem, lack of participation on policy pages... (which seems to be what is said about everyone on RFA's).  I am just feeling, that one needs more than 6 months flight time to gain experience and whatnot.  I really want to place this vote under support, but I just can't bring myself to do so at this time.  I will continue to review contributions, and I may move my vote at a later time.  [[Image:Tinarto-gold-Monk-icon-small.png]] Isk8 00:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) A lot of what Isk8 said is true. And we really do have a lot of candidates already, and the admin team currently isn't in trouble either, so promoting one or two of the other candidates would be enough if requierd later on. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 05:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Like the others I voted for I don't like to choose sides and I know that you are a very good contributor it's just that I don't feel like voting support or oppose at this time :D. --Hellbringer (T/C) 19:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) I'll think about it. The above is mostly true. Cress Arvein(Talk) 21:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Don't really need another administrator right now, but I think Shadow would be a good choice in case we do.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 02:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.