User talk:Skuld14148

Userbox for you!
Please don't kill me. &mdash;Blastedt&mdash; 16:29, 16 January 2007 (CST)

...You mean his talk page?&mdash; Azroth    17:07, 16 January 2007 (CST)


 * That's better. Entropy 17:09, 16 January 2007 (CST)

P/E Daze Paragon
Why don't you submit that Ranger build you preferred over the Daze Paragon? --Ufelder 11:55, 17 January 2007 (CST)


 * No desire to do so &mdash; Skuld 12:00, 17 January 2007 (CST)


 * Hmm, why not? I haven't seen any builds submitted by you before. :P --Ufelder 04:54, 18 January 2007 (CST)


 * I'd rather not fight a battle :P The last one I did a major edit on got unfavoured because protector's strike "only does +10 damage to moving foes" (it was a rampage r/w ¬.¬) &mdash; Skuld 05:10, 18 January 2007 (CST)
 * Nyeh, Prot Strike is good on Dervs, dunno bout thumper, the quick interupt on dazed targets sounds cool though. And...Bash->Crush->Prot strike would be a pretty quick spike.--Llednar 21:57, 19 January 2007 (CST)

Archives
--Midnight08 (talk|contribs) 11:59, 17 January 2007 (CST)

Build:W/Mo Holy Decapitate
I wasn't sure what to do with this. It was reverted by Gredinus I believe, it should never have been moved back into untested since it was already in tested and there was no need for a revote. However, it is still in untested... shouldn't it be moved to tested where it belongs as per vetting procedure? I would have done it myself, but reverting is such an issue I didn't want to get personally involved. Defiant Elements 23:40, 17 January 2007 (CST)

Botherin'
Hey, the guild is dead, but I see you're awake. You wouldn't happen to bein HA wouldja? The PUGS are especially bad tonight and I'm looking to have some fun. --Crazytreeboy 03:44, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Template:Critical Defenses
This is one of the targets of the weekend's temporary updates, and users continue to change it to reflect the new descriptions. I've already reverted once, to the older desc., and my revert keeps getting edited over. Could you take a look at it, revert it back or maybe protect some of the skill template pages for the weekend? Thanks m8. - Krowman  13:41, 20 January 2007 (CST)


 * Only 3 seperate ppl, if it becomes a real problem i'll lock it, but I think its fine for now &mdash; Skuld 13:42, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Same thing, but on page Template:Pious Haste. My edits reverted over, could you RV? Thanks. -[[Image:Spiked Eggnog.jpg|19px]] Krowman [[Image:Spiked Eggnog.jpg|19px]] 01:35, 22 January 2007 (CST)
 * *sigh* Template:Avatar of Lyssa too please. -[[Image:Spiked Eggnog.jpg|19px]] Krowman [[Image:Spiked Eggnog.jpg|19px]] 02:16, 22 January 2007 (CST)

ATTENTION ALL SKULD-HUNTERS
Skuld has been recently spotted on a new character named Shiggity Shkuld! Hurry and capture him! &mdash;Blastedt&mdash; 13:51, 20 January 2007 (CST)


 * WTB Norton
 * *gasp* Skuld forgot to sign?!?! This must be a sign of the apocalypse!  We're all gonna die!!! *runs for cover* :P&mdash; [[Image:Azroth sig.png||builds]] Azroth  [[Image:Azroth sig2.png||talk]]  15:19, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Get off my talk page you vermin! :p &mdash; Skuld 15:19, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Oh nooo...its worse than the apocalypse...its the wrath of Skuld!!! *runs for cover again* :P&mdash; [[Image:Azroth sig.png||builds]] Azroth  [[Image:Azroth sig2.png||talk]] 15:22, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Yeah, I nailed him :D &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 15:23, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Delete?
Why have you deleted my Me/R IW Beastmaster build? I just posted it. =S -- Sigm@  (talk|contribs) 09:49, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * Build:Me/R_Illusionary_Beastmaster &mdash; Skuld 09:51, 21 January 2007 (CST)

That.. was..eh archived. I tried to make a better build for the Me/R IW mesm's. -- Sigm@  (talk|contribs) 09:54, 21 January 2007 (CST)


 * Bleh, edit that one or something &mdash; Skuld 09:57, 21 January 2007 (CST)

No, that one is archived. The shock axe and shit are also updated with a new build, so why can't I make a new build based on an archived build? -- Sigm@  (talk|contribs) 10:00, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * I'll put it back, seems kind of dumb to have practicaly the same thing twice though &mdash; Skuld 10:01, 21 January 2007 (CST)

ty =) -- Sigm@  (talk|contribs) 10:45, 21 January 2007 (CST)


 * You put it back already? - Sigm@ [[image:Glimmer_of_Light.jpg|19px]] (talk|contribs) 14:32, 21 January 2007 (CST)


 * Have now :P &mdash; Skuld 14:33, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Delete Build:D/W Grenths Reaper theres already a favored version.--A Guy 19:15, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Offensive Poster
Hi. Special:Contributions/70.57.80.122 has used bad language in his/her posting, esp. the Talk:Sunspear rank one. Thanks.


 * Not trying to answer for Skuld here, but offering my own insight no the situation, the wiki has no official policies or rules regarding language on this website that do not concern personal attacks of any sort (that I am aware of; please feel free to point one out and prove me wrong). If you find something to be offensive if it is not directed at you in some sort of attack, your only option as far as I am aware is to not look at that comment. You cannot place language limits on another user simply because you find it to be vulgar. Even the owner of this website agrees with that. If I could remember his wiki name, I'd give you a link for evidence. — Jyro X [[Image:Darkgrin.jpg]] 14:04, 22 January 2007 (CST)


 * Is it a problem? &mdash; Skuld 14:02, 22 January 2007 (CST)


 * Apologies for bothering you. I thought vulgar language might not be tolerated, esp the B word.


 * We do not tolerate the use of the word bunnies, ever. :P  (no offense was meant to anyone by this post)  --Rainith 17:07, 22 January 2007 (CST)

Bunnies !! :D /)/) (\(\  (* *) (**) (* *) (^ ^) (^^) (^ ^) (/(/  (/\)  \)\) lol&mdash;  Azroth    21:39, 24 January 2007 (CST)

Samurai
User Samurai something, who built the D/A Shadowstorm whatever (too lazy to get exact names but I'm sure you can figure it out :) ) does seem to have used some random Ip address to put up a fake favored vote for his own build (and to comment votes on other builds, in synch with his own comments. Smoooth). Since I know you're a gentle, sweet, peace-loving administrator, I knew this was right up your alley. Could be just wasting a little more of your time, but was worth a shot, thx. NightAngel 15:19, 22 January 2007 (CST)
 * Not that I care nor that I read the article but: User:Samurai_JM, Build:D/A Shadowstorm Tank. -Ichigo724 15:24, 22 January 2007 (CST)
 * Yeh, noticed that a while ago :P fixed &mdash; Skuld 15:55, 22 January 2007 (CST)

Enchanted Heroes
Please delete that hero team build. It took so long for people to vote on it it's already obsolete, I don't use it anymore. All of my hero teams are now based on paragon shouts and chants, which are much more effective than monk enchantments. Heck, I rarely use monks at all these days, and they are the basis for that page. Edit: Just looked at the builds, I don't use any of that anymore. My MMs now use order of undeath, for instance, not golem. My SF eles use liquid flame, not meteor, etc, etc. And really, all the hero builds I currently use are simply variants of existing builds (now using shouts/chants instead of enchantments), so there is no need for a page of their own. Tear it down and do a maniacal evil laugh while you do it, I know you want to :)NightAngel 09:09, 23 January 2007 (CST)


 * Done &mdash; Skuld 10:00, 23 January 2007 (CST)

weakness is permanent?
what that said. -- Xeon 10:41, 23 January 2007 (CST)
 * i just went and had a look at weakness on myself, there is no attribute change. Why did you revert what i reverted? -- Xeon 10:53, 23 January 2007 (CST)
 * my bad, thought it was permenant &mdash; Skuld 11:02, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Fruitcake...
Wow. That wasn't nice. How can some people be like this? I don't think many people recognize just how much restraint and self control you have to put up with that kinda crap.--  Vallen Frostweaver  13:07, 23 January 2007 (CST)
 * I'm also surprised by no ban, or at least a ban request if you wanted a third party to review it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:16, 23 January 2007 (CST)
 * Looks like Gares banned him. I was tempted to do so; but held off as you didn't react to the vandalism of your own page other than reverting. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:48, 23 January 2007 (CST)
 * I'm not that nice when it comes to that sort of thing. If you look at his contribs and he is who he signed as, it was a trouble maker that Rainith and I banned a few times. If he is an imposter, that's even more reason.
 * I am suprised no ban was placed myself, though I'm not sure what Skuld's reaction comment was about, nor if it was the right action to take. Apparently I must have missed something about babies O.o &mdash; Gares 13:55, 23 January 2007 (CST)

aw, I thought it was funny ;p &mdash; Skuld 14:00, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Build:W/Mo Generic Farmer
I think this build needs a delete. Pointless, too generic, we've already got too many farming builds of this sort. Most people on the talk page agree with the deletion. Thanks. -- Hyperion`   (talk) 14:38, 23 January 2007 (CST)


 * done &mdash; Skuld 14:43, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Del of userpage subpages
ty &mdash;Blastedt&mdash; 17:54, 24 January 2007 (CST)

You do right?
--Nocturne  22:52, 24 January 2007 (CST)

hey yo
how does i become cool like you and spend lots of time living at the wiki and doing wiki work ok peace SPRING TOY THAT CRAWLS DOWN STAIRS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! COPYRIGHTED!!!! 01:52, 25 January 2007 (CST)

lol, another sockpuppet of SIinky. -- S i  g  m  a   03:40, 25 January 2007 (CST)

Healers boon
It says healing prayer spells, so I assumed so. Heal Party+Heal Seed are spells, no? &mdash;Blastedt&mdash; 15:27, 25 January 2007 (CST)
 * Casting seed doesn't heal the person, the enchantment heals them. A generalized note might be fine, but seed isn't a special case.  Also, GW:YOU isn't "GW:Leave edits YOU think are bad alone." --Fyren 15:34, 25 January 2007 (CST)
 * fyren wins >.> &mdash; Skuld 15:37, 25 January 2007 (CST)
 * Yeah, I agree with the removal of the Healing Seed note, its not a bug. However considering that HB and Heal Party did not originally provide the bonus heal to all party members, it might be useful to keep the Heal Party note there.  Users shouldn't need to sort through the discussion to find confirmation that this bug has been fixed. What do you guys think? -- BrianG 15:42, 25 January 2007 (CST)