User talk:Frostty14566

Weapon and charm collectors (ancient history)
Hey Frostty1, what have you done with Weapon and charm collectors? I see you've done something, the recent changes shouts that at me, I can't visually see what though! Can you explain it please, slowly, i'm very tired =P Skuld &Dagger; 05:44, 30 Sep 2005 (EST)


 * There was an update and the items/stats of the items that the collectors were offering, had changed. I updated the collector pages with the current (at that time) items/stats of the items info. Frostty1 00:56, 3 October 2006 (CDT)

Messing around with tables (ancient history)
I also would like to know why you are messing around with all the tables and putting dashes in the empty fields. All it seems to me that you are doing is making the tables look bad. If there is a good reason for this please enlighten us. --Rainith 05:53, 30 Sep 2005 (EST)


 * I wasn't "messing around with all the tables". SOME tables had dashes in the empty fields and SOME DIDN'T. I was doing the OPPOSITE of "making the tables look bad", I was trying to homogenize the tables, to make them all look the consistent. I can see that even a year later, the collector tables are still inconsistent. As an example (prior to someone 'fixing' them)...
 * This table uses dashes in empty cells. http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/General_collectors_%28Kaineng_City%29
 * This table leaves empty cells blank. http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/General_collectors_%28Jade_Sea%29
 * This table uses None in empty cells. http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Collectors
 * This table uses N/A in empty cells. http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Armor_collectors_%28Southern_Shiverpeaks%29
 * Personally, I think tables with blank spaces look unfinished and tables with "N/A" or "none" look cluttered. Frostty1 00:56, 3 October 2006 (CDT)

Resurrect (Action)
Resurrect (Action) isn't a skill, so it shouldn't be under "related skills." If you want to link it from an article, it'd be under "related articles" or "see also," whichever the S&F page says to use. --Fyren 20:24, 13 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Thanks for pointing that distinction to me. I was just following an example I have previously seen. Glad you took the time to let me know the correct format. Frostty1 12:32, 26 October 2006 (CDT)

Moved edit
Hey Frostty, I've moved your edit from Diessa Icon to its talk page. --JP 06:04, 26 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Thanks for moving that... I didn't notice I was on the wrong tab. Lol... I was just so freaked out over the possibility of having 60%+ longer monk enchantments... if I had of kept the OG focus. Frostty1 12:21, 26 October 2006 (CDT)