User talk:Tycn/Archive 1

Hello, it's me, the person who helped edit your R/E Quick Flamer build. Not sure if you care, but I made an account, Nova. From now on, edits by me will be made by Nova. (I also hope that, when I edited your build, I didn't change any of the points you wanted to make.) Thanks. 58.24.194.160 07:59, 11 January 2007 (CST)
 * Np, thanks for informing me. Tycn 18:20, 11 January 2007 (CST)
 * All right, I'm going to Hawaii in a day. I won't have computer access, so I'll test this when I get back home. Can't wait to test it, looks awesome. About the edit you made in Variants: Alliance Battling, I already listed Whirling Defense as a variant. up to u whether or not cuz i kno its a diferent variant for AB. all right, cya. 58.24.194.160 18:57, 11 January 2007 (CST)
 * shoot forgot to log in im in a rushNova 18:58, 11 January 2007 (CST)
 * Bye, and enjoy Hawaii! Tycn 18:59, 11 January 2007 (CST)
 * Thanks! Yay, I'm done packing, I have approximately 24 hours before I leave now. :D Now that I have an account, it's time for me to start doing some GuildWiki work and start writing builds. :D Feel free to visit my awesome user page even though it has only text, rofl. 58.24.194.160 20:31, 11 January 2007 (CST)
 * shoot forgot to logn in AGAIN Nova 20:31, 11 January 2007 (CST)

I hope you don't mind, but in the effort to help build stubs I filled in Build:Mo/E_Hasty_Healer to something I thought had in mind. Lonely Monk 12:23, 20 February 2007 (CST)

Lyssa's Avatar
Your reason for voting unfavored on this build was that it had a IAS, no energy and poor healing. I'd like to remind you that this is a random arena build, where usually a monk or ritulist will heal you anyway. The build requies a zealous scythe, which is menetioned in the equipment and Avatar of Lyssa's effect gives +20 energy, which is definetly enought energy. I think you should reconsider your vote, as the things you claimed it didn't have it does. Also, A IAS is actually a good thing ; it makes you attack faster, Thankyou. Solus  02:22, 2 March 2007 (CST)

Build:Team - HA Ritualist Spike
We have a few options with that, and it's really up to you. 1. Re-write (some of it, anyway) and put forth as a build suggestion. It still works in HA, and will still get massive amounts of fame; the nerf merely chases most inexperienced players away from using it. 2. Re-write for intentional archive, not really trying to make it work now. 3. Throw a delete tag on it and call it gg. If you do choose to re-write it, there are two further options with that. The first is to work together and talk everything through (it takes longer, but you learn more). The other, naturally, is me just re-writing it and you not learning much about why I'm making the changes I am. Pick your choice, I'm just here to help :) -Auron  03:32, 9 March 2007 (CST)

I guess the first option is best idea, if you reckon it still works. And I'll add whatever I can. Tycn 03:58, 9 March 2007 (CST)

E/N Cryonic DoT Elementalist
Hey, Tycn, nice to hear from you again. Well, one of the reasons my build rather sucked was because I am completely restricted to only Prophecies testing. (I didn't even know of Icy Shackles until you told me of it!) Yeah, the build you suggested looks really nice. You will need a bit more frequent damage (the 7 second recharge on Vapor Blade is a killer), try throwing in Ice Spear (or some odd Factions/Nightfall spell :P) which could go into the Optional slot. And Icy Shackles does not synergize well with Vapor blade, one's success is dependent on the foe's enchantments, one is dependent on not having any enchantments on the foe. That's just my perspective anyways. Feel free to remake the build and change it around as much as you need, I'd also suggest renaming it too. Thanks again! -- Nova   --  (contribs) 08:23, 14 March 2007 (CDT)

Well, having both Vapor Blade and Icy Shackles create a lose-lose situation for your target, but damage is a bit low. I'll think about it, thanks. Moving build back to stubs. Tycn 02:14, 15 March 2007 (CDT)


 * You don't know how much I want to throw Spinal Shivers in there ^.^ It doesn't look like that's why people hated it before, seems like it was just the double exhaustion. But I'd like your opinion, too, please. -- Nova  [[Image:NovaSmall.PNG]] --  (contribs) 19:18, 15 March 2007 (CDT)