GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Warwick (5)

Warwick (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count)
I have a strong feeling that May is dedicated to the Wiki. She knows every policy there is. She is on the wiki most of the time. She is often helping out on a few articles. She has more than 500 main space edits (don't really feel like counting the pages). I know she is willing to do her best and is willing to do whatever she can to gain anyone's respect. She might have started a lot of drama but is willing to change for the better of Wiki. --EDIT-- Any problems that will possibly result into a huge argument and spam of Recent Changes, please put in talk page. Hel llb rin ger 20:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

 * 1) This user has fully admited that she is a troll and likes to make wiki drama.  Two qualities that I look for in an admin. --R.Phalange 20:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This user has fully admited that she is a troll and likes to make wiki drama.  Two qualities that I do not look for in an admin.  EDIT:  Forgot to mention, I think that she would abuse admin tools, she proved to me that she will on logd when she cheated and crashed the site.  -- Shadowphoenix  20:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Try to keep it to wiki-specific things, I think. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 20:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Epic....Read above Support. --Hel llb rin ger 21:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Take any of my opposes from the last RfA. Add on vast amounts of drama. May having admin tools would not lead to an overall improvement of this wiki. Lord of all tyria 20:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Two words: no, again. Cress Arvein [[Image:Cress sig.JPG]] 20:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) She causes wiki-drama without showing that she can be able to settle arguments in a civilized manner, something that administrators should be able to do. She is obviously not loyal to guild wiki, as she has threatened to/has left on multiple occasions. She isn't on good terms with many users here either, and has broken NPA a lot, and her acount (not necessarily her), has some... less-than-amazing contributions.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 20:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Fifth time's the charm, right? Maybe if you do enough of these, everyone will give in. Oh, wait, no one here's quite that dumb. Lord Belar 20:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * NPA, please, Belar. I think that crosses the line slightly. -- [[Image:Isk8.png]]  I~sk8   (T/C) 20:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Er... no. May trolls, admits to doing so, and refuses to stop even when asked. Which is bad (and also implies she would do so with other matters). She has a horrible history of taking unilateral actions without asking anyone. Also bad. She has caused more wiki-drama and strife than anyone I can remember on the wiki (I don't know the "old crowd", but May is definitely worst since I've been here). Very bad. She refuses to accept reason, whether asked nicely or demanded to. Bad. Honestly, I could go on, but I really don't think I need to. --Shadowcrest 20:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Simply saying that one is willing to change does not necessitate the conclusion that one will change. Warwick has repeatedly demonstrated that she either cannot or refuses to use proper discretion in making judgments.  She pushes the limits of the spirit of wiki policies herself, but quotes the word of the policies to others.  Even after repeated warnings and advice from multiple people, she continued to initiate large-scale editing projects without community consensus.  In short, Warwick has had plenty of time to change already, but all evidence shows that she has not.  She would need to change first in order to show that she can be trusted with administrator powers, and only then should she be considered for the position.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 21:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Trying not to let past events influence my overall judgment, I still feel that Warwick needs a little more time to show the community that she truly wants this, and is willing to work for and towards it.  Her arguments with other users as well as tendencies to start projects without proper notification and consent is an issue.  And her tendencies to rage quit the wiki make me wonder if she really wants this or not. No more to comment for the time being, but I will probably expand upon this statement when I have the time. -- [[Image:Isk8.png]]   I~sk8   (T/C) 20:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)