User talk:Randomtime/GuildWiki:Request for Rights

I believe we don't need this policy. I don't see any changes in the RfA process, bureuacrat requests are going to be a waste of time if there's no 'crat position to fill, and the other two rights can be more easily granted by the Bcrats assigning among themselves the duty of handling these, and people who want that posting to their talkpage, as these rights don't carry with them as much weight. If it's handled via talkpage, interested parties can still comment. --◄mendel► 22:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Prehaps, I was more thining of putting them in one area, instead of having them spread around the wiki Random Time  09:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Defrag is good on a computer, but it exists for a reason on Wiki. I don't think this is necessary. Rollback rights isn't even on the radar still, since (to my knowledge) no one has them or has even requested them to this date. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 10:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd probably request it for a number of non sysops, but there is no current policy yet Random Time  10:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * There's no policy because the idea has stagnated and no one seems to care much about failing or passing it as a policy. At this point in time I'm willing to accept whatever; since I know some users could use rollback effectively, too, and waiting around for policy bores me. Maybe we need a mass vandal attack to spur some more action. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 10:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, but I don't want to clean it up, last big one was PODAX Random Time  10:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Now, a tool which reverted all of a user's contributions up to ...that would be a tool worthy of a drawn-out request process. Rollback seems so benign really that I wish people would just ask me for it instead of waiting for policy. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 10:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)