Talk:I-blow

Is this page really necessary? --Ruricu ( Talk • Contribs) 02:10, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Is your face? &mdash; Skuld 02:10, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Can you think of a reason to delete it? [[Image:GDSig.JPG]] 02:11, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * I 'spose the only reason to have it is so people can be lazy and type I-blow instead... but I don't think it's necessary either... --Ruricu [[Image:SoD2.jpg|Shield of Deflection is purty!]] ( Talk • Contribs) 02:15, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Delete, not keep. We know why it's here; and is any convenience truly necessary?  [[Image:GDSig.JPG]] 02:17, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * I was simply giving an example of the inverse. I guess there's no real reason not to have it, but no real reason to have it either... you win. --Ruricu [[Image:SoD2.jpg|Shield of Deflection is purty!]] ( Talk • Contribs) 02:20, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Hooray, my first wiki debate, however insignificant. [[Image:GDSig.JPG]] 02:21, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * Wouldnt say debate, more sledging then anything else atm. -- Xeon 02:23, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * I could understand iblow redirecting, but... i-blow is a stretch. - Auron 02:23, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * agree with auron. -- Xeon 02:26, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

Gonna test summat, hold tight. - Auron 02:33, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
 * A search for i-blow returned abnormally junk results. If the search result was halfway decent, I'd delete this redirect... but I'll let it stand. - Auron 02:35, 9 July 2007 (CDT)