User talk:KittySoft9169

Why don't you remake Mage Bow as R/E? you're only using 1 ele skill! :) 00:07, 18 February 2006 (CST)

---

Thanks for double checking me. :) It means a lot. --Ravious 00:18, 24 February 2006 (CST)

---

You might want to rework your Warrior build. At this point, all it's doing is keeping itself alive and dealing as much as no damage... Trust the monks, they can keep you alive no matter how bad they are, just stay in their radius. You should not put points in more than two attributes unless you have a real reason to do so. =/ --Nilles 04:28, 18 April 2006 (CDT)


 * That build is outdated atm, i'll update them when Mage Bow gets to level 20. --KittySoft 07:53, 18 April 2006 (CDT)

---

Thanks for the language correction. How stupid of me. ("What!? Someone actually reads my user page!?") --Gem 10:35, 18 April 2006 (CDT)

Vandal
I don't think we've met (I'm sure there's lots of people on the GuildWiki I haven't interacted with) yet but you seem to be faster at removing the vandalism than me so I'll go to bed then (it's past midnight here in Australia) but good job on it. I'll have to remember to put a thanks on Stabber's page too but she might bring up some other crazy piece of Aussie fauna again and we do have plenty to choose from :) Maybe it'll be an emu next time...anyway back on topic, thanks again, removing vandalism is now a slightly less thankless job ^_^ --Xasxas256 09:09, 18 April 2006 (CDT)

Ahvha's Longbow
The page can be found at Ahvha's Longbow, not sure why you added it to a redirect :) &mdash; Skuld  05:47, 10 June 2006 (CDT)

Adjusting the Featured build
In the future, please make sure that you follow the Server clock when updating the Featured Builds section. Right now, we have 2 builds set on the 29th, which screws up my article on past featured builds list. --Rapta 20:31, 29 June 2006 (CDT)
 * My mistake, that was not a featured build adjustment, but a vandal. My mistake. :P --Rapta 20:33, 29 June 2006 (CDT)

Scalable skill bar
I noticed you are using on your user-page with 3 empty slots in it. Instead of not specifying anything, try specifying Optional. Will result in this:




 * Or just
 * optional is there automatically for unspecified slots &mdash; Skuld  13:38, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
 * optional is there automatically for unspecified slots &mdash; Skuld  13:38, 13 July 2006 (CDT)

Sig
Kitty, please keep images used in sigs to about line height, dunno, about 22px or so? Talk pages will get horribly distorted if you use those 40px images or whatever they are. I noticed you have a note saying "copy and paste this" - you should be copying and pasting this  or it will show an include link. Thanks &mdash; Skuld  08:55, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
 * lowered it to 28px --Image:Kitty1.png|28px| (Talk) (Cont) Image:Soft2.png|28px| 09:56, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Now it is unreadable and still too large.. &mdash; Skuld  10:04, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
 * The colors are awfull, the text unreadable and the images too high. Time to redo the images in 20-25px size? --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 12:42, 23 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Just chiming in... Very unreadable. --Karlos 13:47, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
 * It might help if you changed from PNGs to JPEGs as they will scale better. --Rainith 14:00, 23 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Done --[[Image:Kitty1.jpg|24px|]] (Talk) (Cont) [[Image:Soft2.jpg|24px|]] 01:22, 24 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Better. I disagree with your choice of colors, but that might just be me. ;) --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 03:28, 24 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Yaaarrgh. Pastels just doesn't agree with me, but let me tell you, pink-on-teal and especially vice-versa were bad enough in the eighties. Don't let the eighties happen again, please. Lemme add some constructive criticism here along with the destructive kind listed above - you might want to sharpen the font after scaling it down in a tool such as Photoshop; or just use a smaller font to begin with. Those words; almost impossible to read. --Black Ark 05:04, 24 July 2006 (CDT)