User talk:Jupsto/Archive 1

Retarded voters
can't see an amazing build when it morris dances naked infront of them in the sahara desert.

Rate-a-build voting system
Favoured:
 * 1) (your vote here)

Unfavoured
 * 1) absolutely stupid-Jupsto

Userpage
About your question: 'WHY IS IW SLASHER BETTER THEN IW WARRIOR?' Well the IW Warrior has some serious energy problems. -- S i  g  m  A   09:47, 31 January 2007 (CST)

wrong again. i'm fine on energy with it even if not using ether signet. Jupsto

About your usebox. You say you don't like Wammo's. What's the problem? -- S i  g  m  A   08:36, 1 February 2007 (CST) how do u get pictures on your signiture? 18:03, 1 February 2007 (CST)

I'm sure there are some good warriors out there. But generally I find so many noobs play W/Mo especially in PvE and they all think they are so great. They all do a Leeroy Jenkins thinking they are invincible and make us lose. And most warriors have poor damage compared with compared with assassins and pretty much every other proffesion. Some builds are an exception to this. They generally just dont have any brains.

An example is when I was on the Drought mission in nighfall the only players i could find was a team of warriors. Dispite what i said they didn't seem to understand that they could do 0 damage to the drought, anyhow we did started and they wanted to to it elite since they are so invincible. We did kill the dought as I put backfire, empathy and other armour ignoring skills which owned it. They probably still think they killed it tho.

Image is image:"name of image".jpg|19px --look on edit

Jupsto

FYI, noone is required to test a build at all before voting on it. So not sure what you mean by that userbox. Entropy 06:15, 2 February 2007 (CST)

Quote from any un-tested disscussion: ''Please test and vote on new builds. Please do not vote on a build until you have actually tested it.'' Jupsto

Yes, and do you know what Please means? Besides, that's not the current edition of the R-a-b. Entropy 06:19, 2 February 2007 (CST)

OK, I dont think anybody has tested the builds I have contributed, that is what my user box is about. Which most people may consider as a stupid system. Jupsto

There also seems to be only about 5 people who "test" the untested builds. Pherphaps determined not to have there tested builds clusted?. Not a big deal its just anoying. Jupsto
 * Well, most people see our builds section as an ambarrasement. That's why not many people test our untested builds. But we mainly get builds who won't work/are useless. And for that reason people won't spend their time testing builds if they are going to be unfavored in about 5 minutes. I hope I've informed you enough ;-) -- S i  g  m  A  [[image:Aura_of_Faith.jpg|19px|||My Talk]] 12:16, 2 February 2007 (CST)

Watchlist question
I think the (+31) refers to the amount of characters that have changed since the last edit. So a brand new page might be (+2934) while a spelling correction might be (+1) or (-1). -- Peej 08:38, 5 February 2007 (CST)

Cheers Mate. That explains it. -Jupsto

hi
This is a courtesy message to inform you about limiting the amount of edits you make to the same page so you do not spam the Recent changes list. When making small edits can you use the 'Show preview' button and only use the 'Save page' button when you think the results from 'Show preview' are correct. -- Xeon 05:58, 6 February 2007 (CST)

K, sorry. I do my best ^^ Jupsto

Berserker's KD
Build:W/any Berserker's Knock-Down, there's the link ;). By the way, have you tested the build yet? maybe you can vote favoured XDD.--Rickyvantof 03:06, 16 February 2007 (CST)

Yeah I put a coment on favoured. but i still prefer my varient. I've added lift enchantment too. ^^ still not my fav build. -jupsto
 * I edited my build, it's quite similar to yours now, it also uses backbreaker.^^--Rickyvantof 08:49, 20 February 2007 (CST)