User talk:GW-Stabber

/archive 1 /archive 2

STABBER you're listening to ONE person! Please don't be so hot-headed.. Skuld  14:06, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
 * I must admit my faith in the guildwiki has been tested of late but nothing like what you've gone through. What F G said was the most vindictive thing I've ever read on the GuildWiki. I think Gem has said he'll leave if you do, I don't want to think about that, I want to stay to make sure you do. Maybe I'm fanning the flames by saying this, I don't care, I want you to know that I support you, there's no way I'd support someone who uses language like F G does. I'm so angry so I can't imagine how you're feeling, if it was me I think I'd be so cut up I'd be pissing shards of glass at this point. Good luck with Tanaric's arbitration, I support you and I'm sure many others here do to. I'm sorry that you've been dragged through this. --Xasxas256 18:20, 9 May 2006 (CDT)
 * If you didn't allready, you can read it all at User talk:F G. I'm just waiting for the next move of F G and letting the matter settle for now. --Gem [[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png|Gem]] 18:24, 9 May 2006 (CDT)


 * For those of you who care: Requests for arbitration. &mdash;Tanaric 21:31, 9 May 2006 (CDT)


 * Tantrums or no, you're my favorite wikignome, Stabber. Skuld is only ONE person too, but you should listen to him, 'cause he invited me to his guild (even if my wife may force me to leave it again). ;) --Bishop (rap|con) 18:50, 9 May 2006 (CDT)


 * Well I'm not sure if you're still reading this (perhaps esan is) but I've made my opinion clear here GuildWiki_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Stabber_and_esan_vs_F_G. I don't blame you for a second for leaving but it's a shame to see you go. I don't even see what I can do to try to avoid this kind of thing happening in the future. Orwell's 1984 opened my eyes, this is opening my eyes too, people can be cruel. Nothing good has come out of this, no hope that it won't happen in the future has been given from our overbearers but I'd love to see you come back and fight the good fight again. --Xasxas256 09:22, 10 May 2006 (CDT)


 * Oh, I'm reading, but you know, being a nonentity and possibly a sockpuppet, and blinded by loyalty, it doesn't really matter. Now that the dust has settled, I've realised that I just completely disagree with Tanaric's assessment of Stabber's contributions. He (and many others) have simply accepted FG's assessment of her, that she only does minor "maintenance worker" stuff. Keeps the curtains taut, carpets scrubbed, ashtrays emptied, that sort of thing. They keep saying that FG's comments were harsh but accurate, when I would say they were unjustified and wrong. But, what would I, a nonentity and possibly a sockpuppet, completely blinded to reason by loyalty, know? So I see the thing with the skillboxes bothered her enough that she came back and finished that task. Big deal! Anyone else could have done it. Now let us see about that new Droknar's running guide. That, unlike fiddling with skillboxes, seems useful and valuable and scholarly. esan 12:30, 10 May 2006 (CDT)


 * Whoa! Don't take words of one or two people so seriously. Most of us said clearly taht her edits are not crap or only maintenance working. I clearly stated that I appreciate her work a lot, don't say I didn't. --Gem [[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png|Gem]] 12:38, 10 May 2006 (CDT)
 * Btw: PanSola was crying for the skill boxes and we are all really happy that Stabber came for a short visit to do them. The Droks running guide was almost tagged for deletion. --Gem [[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png|Gem]] 12:40, 10 May 2006 (CDT)


 * Heh. I blame you, Stabber, for leaving. Come back, don't let someone who does not like you dictate what you will or will not do and don't make it a habbit to leave whenever something bothers you here. It diminshes your credibility and your dedication when every month you quit the wiki because of an incident with another user. You're more valuable than this and you're better than this. Hope to see you back soon. --Karlos 11:18, 10 May 2006 (CDT)


 * I agree. You jumped on the first build I submitted, and I hated and loved you for it. Despite the controversey over at GWGuru, I still appreciated how you cleaned it up and left some comments about the build and the nature of my activies on GuildWiki. I don't know you at all, but I wish more people like you were around on this wiki.--Jack Valmont 17:38, 12 May 2006 (CDT)


 * Uhm...not sure how to go about this, but ah...well, I saw the work you did with Melandru's Toucher (based off of the Touch Ranger) build, and I have a similar issue I wanted help with, so I clicked over here to politely request your assistance...and found this quasi-political hotbed. I've seen your work, and the work of your bot almost everywhere and you seemed like the most competent person to approach.

I know you're gone, or intend to be or whatnot, but if the word of a mildly-adoring fan matters, I'd appreciate your continued participation. My own opinion is that F G did a very hit-and-run insult attack, like many people on the internet, and was just looking to cause a fracas - if they stood behind what they said, they would not have made a 'final edit' after the desired stink was raised.

Anyhow, if you're still around, I'd like to humbly ask you to peruse http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Category_talk:Builds and read over my request for help there. GodOfAtheism 22:54, 16 May 2006 (CDT)