User talk:Stabber/Sig

Good idea, with that ammount of code it's hard to read the talk pages =P 02:40, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This isn't any different from your or my sig, Skuld. (Infact, I stole the idea from you in the first place.) All you'll see on talk pages is >. -- 04:14, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I was meaning it's a good idea for him to have it in a template as it's a lot of code for it to be all pasted on the page each time (also I stole it from LordBiro =P) 07:28, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It's "her", not "him". But are we gendered online? &mdash; Stabber 08:19, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I've been mistaking for a female many times.. er Oo. Apologies 10:04, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Not surprising, as Skuld is a valkyrie (or a d&iacute;s, if you want to be precise). &mdash; Stabber 10:59, 23 April 2006 (CDT)
 * Err, doesn't that cause some template weirdness? (Server having to update every single page you've edited whenever you change your sig?) Or is this not a problem for Guildwiki like it is for Wikipedia (they have a page specifically saying that you should use "subst" instead of actually including the template)? &mdash; 130.58 (talk) ( 11:23, 23 April 2006 (CDT) )
 * At this stage in the game it is too late to worry about the recaching penalty for templated signatures. There are too many pages that use it. &mdash; Stabber 11:25, 23 April 2006 (CDT)
 * True. I guess we can always get a bot to clean those up later if it really becomes an issue... which it's not as long as there's about 10 people using sigs and they seldom change their sigs. I, meanwhile, will continue subst-ing, because that's how I get the date to work correctly. Cheers! &mdash; 130.58 (talk) ( 11:38, 23 April 2006 (CDT) )