Category talk:Weapons

Are the minimum and maximum damage lines necessary? From what i understood, damage is only based on the general (axe/bow/etc) and not the specific (half moon/short bow/storm bow).
 * If anyone actually visits the individual weapon pages, it's nice to have the information there. You're right that it's based on the weapon type.  --Fyren 06:11, 16 Aug 2005 (EST)
 * When I started the item listing, I wasn't aware that all weapons within a type had the same damages. All the lines are pretty much wrong, anyway.  I'd actually suggest removing them. &mdash;Tanaric 15:35, 16 Aug 2005 (EST)

One-Handed Spellcaster Weapons
I suggest that we put all the one-handed spellcaster weapons in one category. Wands, Rods, Canes, Truncheons and Cestas basically are all the same in my eyes. And it would be rather ridiculous to create a sub-category for each class and put only one or two weapons in it, I think. :) Just how should we name that category? --Eightyfour-onesevenfive 19:38, 9 Sep 2005 (EST)

Categorization
Similar to Category:Bestiary, shouldn't all weapons only be in their corrosponding sub-category and not in Category:Weapons, too? --Eightyfour-onesevenfive 05:56, 13 Sep 2005 (EST)