GuildWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Xeeron

Rebuttal to Anon Oppose vote
Correction, this user can see a bad build because he knows how to monk, and how builds should be created. Vote should be ignored, anon blanks talk pages and removes comments &mdash; Skuld 13:45, 25 July 2006 (CDT)

removal of votes of known vandals
please strike the vote of the anon IP that is known to vandalize pages. his bitterness should not be preserved here --Honorable Sarah 14:41, 25 July 2006 (CDT)
 * I don't see a reason to remove it unless it's shown to be a subversion of the voting process. Someone being stupid isn't a reason to revoke suffrage, especially when the outcome isn't bound to the numeric result of the vote.  Skuld's comment mostly clarifies the situation.  --68.142.14.19 14:50, 25 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Well, it's obvious why User:70.132.22.101 struck out all the unfavored and then went for User:Xeeron here, the anon created the build. People have to know if they can't take the criticism, they should not post their builds, hence why I have never posted a build here :P -Gares 15:24, 25 July 2006 (CDT)
 * I moved Skuld's defense of Xeeron to the top of this talk page. The anon has a right to his vote, no matter how misguided you may think it is. You can argue about the validity of his vote in talk, but please don't mess up the vote itself. The only reason I can justify removing a vote is if the voter is banned. &mdash;Tanaric 06:56, 28 July 2006 (CDT)