Talk:Web of Disruption

Does it interupt if it's remove before the 10 sec?&mdash; ├ A ratak  ┤  09:49, 22 September 2006 (CDT)

I'm guessing it does, it says it interrupts when it ends. :P - [Entheos Geon 15:50, 22 September 2006 (CDT)]
 * wastrel worry says end and dont do dmg when end premeturely. :p &mdash; ├ A ratak  ┤  20:46, 22 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Wastrel's Worry specifically states that it deals the damage after 3 seconds. Based on the skill description, this will interrupt if it is ended prematurely. 220.233.103.77 20:53, 22 September 2006 (CDT)
 * It will. I've been using it all morning. Alt F Four 06:47, 23 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Shatter Delusions? -- Dashface [[Image:Dashface.png]] 09:41, 26 September 2006 (CDT)
 * If the skill is self-removed then it shouldn't do anything (Terra Xin 09:53, 6 October 2006 (CDT))
 * What on earth gave you that idea? Wastrel's Worry, I assume. Wastrel's is worded differently to this. In wastrels, the damage is only done if the hex lasts it's full duration, so shatter or drain delusions wouldn't cause the damage. This has the same wording as Phantom Pain, which is fairly popular to use as shatterbait, as then you can cause a deep wound and some damage. --Khoross 13:19, 6 October 2006 (CDT)
 * erm no. I'm speaking on behalf of logic. It's simply impossible for this hex to interrupt you if you use a hex-removal skill on yourself, because the hex removal skill would end, then it would remove the hex, and 'then' the hex would interrupt. It can't interrupt something that is removing it... Note that I did say "Self-Removed". If anything that I have said turns out to be false, then the skill description is flawed, because the hex removal never occured because it was interrupted, but then the hex should still be in play because it wasn't removed.(Terra Xin 06:20, 24 October 2006 (CDT))

Hex application
Is the hexing contingient on the initial interrupt? That is, if you fail to interrupt your opponent, is the hex still placed? I didn't get a chance to test this one. Tarinoc 00:43, 28 September 2006 (CDT)

The wording is ambiguous. Since the interrupt and hex clauses are two seperate sentences, I would've thought they'd be independant, but then it goes on to say interrupted "again", which makes it sound like the first one succeeding was essential. Arshay Duskbrow 01:12, 28 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Not so, there is such a thing as a failed interrupt, i.e. an interrupt that didn't interrupt anything, but that's not saying the interrupt didnt happen.(Terra Xin 09:52, 6 October 2006 (CDT))


 * Also from the wording, this seems to interrupt Actions, so you're very unlikely to miss the first interrupt unless you hit someone running. --Theeth (talk)   20:44, 29 September 2006 (CDT)

i was just thinking this with physic distraction. alot of interrupt in this one hex, may aswell manipulate that into a knockdown.