User talk:Sefre13616

/archive1

User:Defiant Elements/Build Collaboration
In case you're interested. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 23:44, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
 * lol, my talk page message popped up when I hit show preview on that talk page.--Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] 23:46, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

Let's Draft a New Policy
I'm glad that you agree with my idea. I honestly see no other way of having a build section without voting. I do not know how to go about making a new proposal though. ;) Giangn626 03:00, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
 * There are guidelines to proposing a new policy. I don't have time to create it myself(only have a couple minutes to check watch list) but I would support it if it outlines the ideas in build wipes talk page. When I would be able to get on I would help out.--Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] 19:19, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

Builds wipe
Please stop vandalising Builds wipe &mdash; Skuld 08:56, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * You both broke GW:1RV. Stop re-reverting that piece of text. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (gem / talk) 10:14, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Wow! admins are making up violations now! And of course they don't pay any attention to the the vandalism of my note on the page! Amazing, good job gem and skuld, good job.--Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] Talk*Cont. 17:30, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Well, 1RV is an actual violation. Besides, your comment doesn't belong on the page to begin with.  It isn't a facet of the implementation or the wipe, it is a compilation of opinions which belongs on the talk page.  [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  17:34, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * What has that got to do with anything? Nazi admins! Oppression! &mdash; Skuld 17:35, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Also, Gem wrote: "You both GW:1RV" referring to both Skuld and yourself. [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  17:37, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) Show me where I violated? I added the comment on one page, Zerris vandalized it by removing a fact, I reverted back, And that was it, one revert, only skulds action was a violation as he did revert again.
 * 2)It is a matter directly relating to the article, the rest of the page is a completely opinionated piece of work favoring it, I do not see where you are coming from.
 * 3)I am removing skulds irrelevant spam-Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] Talk*Cont. 17:39, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * You just told everyone where the violation happened. :D Please read the 1RV policy. You first put the stuff in the article, which someone then reverted. That is acceptable. However, you then re-reverted by putting it in the article again. That revert and all reverts after that were breaking the policy. If I see anyone putting that text in there or taking it away again, I'll ban every single one of those users. You allready continued breaking the policy after being warned, but I'm going lightly today as I'm so happy that Kalomeli has returned from NY. The text stays out of the article like it is now, period. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (gem / talk) 17:45, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Yeah, you kind of incriminated yourself there... [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]] *Defiant Elements*   +talk  17:51, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Wow, you have to use a policy to keep a hurtful, truthful comment from your little article. No wonder you guys have gotten away with this for so long, this is pure wiki fascism. You are attacking any opposition to your plan and looking the other way at rules broken by those on your side.
 * Ban me, lets prove my point, lets see how the almighty popular names will bash down their opposition. Come on, do it. --Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] Talk*Cont. 17:52, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Actually, I thought Tanaric supported the existence of your opposition petition. Anyway, what you wrote didn't belong there, put it in the talk page, you aren't getting banned for what you said, you are getting banned for policy violation. Also, no one ever said wiki wasn't a dictatorship, in fact, I think it has been said that to some extent, it is a dictatorship. [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]] *Defiant Elements*   +talk  17:55, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * He's so brave! So courageous! He's our martyr, the mighty Sefre! Telling it how it is, sticking it to the Man, defending the freedom of speech for all of us! WE LOVE YOU, SEFRE! HAVE MY BABIES! HAVE ME! --Dirigible 17:57, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Furthermore, Gem DID warn Skuld, saying that his reversion was a violation, so, to sum up, of everything you have complained about, none of it has been true. [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  17:56, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * DE, I see no violation. from RV1:"Exception: A first revert without any explanation conflicts with GuildWiki:Assume good faith, is not protected by this policy, and may be fair game for re-reversion." And I'm removing all spam crap from this page--Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] Talk*Cont. 17:58, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Did you ask for explanation? [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  17:59, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * The point of AGF and 1RV are to encourage discussion rather than reverts. If you asked for an explanantion before you re-reverted, than perhaps you are correct, I would need to re-read 1RV to be sure, but, if not, if you also re-reverted without explanation, then you are equally guilty.  [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  18:01, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Equally guilty? it was a unexplained revert that I removed, from the wording of that line that justifies it, according to that line Zerris did not justify his revert so I undid it, and there was no violation. And will you please stop creating new indentations....--Sefre  [[Image:Sefresig.jpg|15px|]] Talk*Cont. 18:08, 12 April 2007 (CDT)

GW:SIGN
The sub tag isn't allowed. Please remove it immediately. -- (gem / talk) 17:45, 12 April 2007 (CDT)