Template talk:NavBox

Apply NavFrame style?
Should I? I think it would look neat (note the "hide" on the far right).

NavBox Title (color optional) NavBox content

(color optional)

For further info see: User talk:Fyren -- 10:31, 30 November 2006 (CST)


 * Yeh :) &mdash; Skuld 10:33, 30 November 2006 (CST)
 * weird - I haven't copied over the needed JS yet - so when I first arrive at a page with this, no "hide" or "show" link appears (as expected). But, after a few seconds, the hide button suddenly appears on its own.  Is the JS being auto-downloaded at each page view? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 10:44, 30 November 2006 (CST)
 * If it is being auto-downloaded; will it be a bandwidth concern if/when all users start auto-downloading JS on page views containing this? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 10:46, 30 November 2006 (CST)
 * If you look in the source, you'll see it referencing something like wiki?title=-&action=raw&gen=js. The wiki combines all the various JS files into one and serves it to you.  It won't get downloaded every view because your browser caches it.  As for slowness, dunno.  The bandwidth this consumes is nothing compared to a single image.  --Fyren 10:50, 30 November 2006 (CST)
 * Something smells a bit fishy here. Downloading pages that use the NavFrame script takes considerably longer than it would without the NavFrame. (But only when you're in edit mode / make changes / preview.) --[[Image:TurningL sml.gif|Tetris L]] 10:53, 30 November 2006 (CST)


 * I would say: Yes, absolutely, do it. I would have implemented it that way in the first place, if I'd only known how. --MRA 12:44, 30 November 2006 (CST)

Vertical version
How about a vertical navbox for placement on the right side of the article? --Voidvector 08:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)