Template talk:Shockwave

Do we really need to state the same info 3 times? Seems silly. Mr IP 19:02, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * If it were 3 the same things they would've used 3 the same words. Yikey ∞  19:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it does. I call a vote for this one, should we go by past precedent (make a progression for every value that can change) or go for not taking up tons of space to simply repeat info? --Gimmethegepgun 19:20, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The closer you are when this spell is cast the more damage you get. Yikey  ∞  19:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * He means that the damage progression on each one is the same, so why bother having 3 tables for it? --Gimmethegepgun 19:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Derp. I knew that I think. Yikey ∞  19:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)