User:LordBiro

{| width="100%" style="background: none; font-family: Georgia,sans;" cellpadding=4 cellspacing=4
 * style="text-align: center; background: #fff; border: 2px dotted black; font-size: 12pt;" | LordBiro
 * style="text-align: center; background: #ddf; border: 2px dotted black;" width="25%" | Edit This Page
 * valign="top" style="background: #ddf; border: 2px dotted black;" |
 * valign="top" style="background: #ddf; border: 2px dotted black;" |

About Me
Hello :) welcome to my page!

My name in Guild Wars is "Lord Biro" but more often than not I am referred to as baxter. I can usually be contacted on the quakenet irc network with the nick baxter. Please feel free to say hello :) I should let you know that if my name is in uppercase (BAXTER) then I'm probably away or offline.

If you're playing Guild Wars you may notice me playing as Lord Biro, although this is my original character and more often than not I'm playing as a PvP character. At the moment I'm playing as a Rt/Me called "Giant Robot Kettle".

At long last I have settled in what will probably be my last guild, [HoK]. If you see some HoK guys around say hi, they are really friendly and read the GuildWiki frequently.

My website is EndOfLevelBoss.org. It's really great, you should have a look and then tell me how great it is. Go on!

My thoughts on GuildWiki
If you want to discuss any of these points please to so on my talk page. :)

GuildWiki > official documentation
If you've ever developed a system you will know that documenting it is a pain in the ass. The main problem stems from one important point: the developers of a system are too close to the system itself to document it adequately for a user. This means that either one of two things is likely to happen.
 * The documentation will be overly technical and not useful.
 * The documentation will be written by a team of manual writers, who might not fully understand the technical information passed to them.

Stabber made the point recently that an official wiki, maintained by ArenaNet, would contain more accurate information than the GuildWiki. I believe this line of thinking is flawed and optimistic.

If ArenaNet cannot get the in-game skill descriptions right then I doubt they would be able to provide any more accurate information on a wiki. And on top of that, what kind of information would they provide? What the developers expect will happen in the game might be very different to what actually happens in the game. It would be very difficult for developers to predict the emergent behaviour that comes from using skills in combination.

Overall I feel that user-created documentation will always be superior to official documentation.

GuildWiki images
The new profession icons have been updated for some time now, and they are looking rather awesome if I do say so myself!



I recently made a little star,, that I am quite fond of. It reminds me of Kirby.

Monks and Ritualists
I'm a Monk, through and through, and so Factions has brought some interesting new choices. As well as the Monk's Factions skills there are also a number of Ritualist skills that would support a Monk. I've started a page, User:LordBiro/Mo Rt Skills, that lists some Ritualist skills that I think would be useful to a Monk. Any feedback would be appreciated :)


 * valign="top" style="background: #fff; border: 2px dotted black;" |

 LordBiro, Healing Monk


 * Contact Me
 * IRC
 * #ltd
 * Web
 * EndOfLevelBoss.org


 * }