GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/RoseOfKali

=== RoseOfKali (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count &bull; RFA page) ===

Good contributions - and good work with the armour galleries project - penmanships would help - it seems as due to the armour galleries project - a number of deletions occur - that adminship should be given. I'm going with the theory that "more is always better" when is comes to trusted members of the community. Random Time 17:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: You may be right, I don't do much RC patrol, but I do a lot with images (and plan on continuing), and always feel kinda bad tagging dozens of images for deletion for someone else to handle. I don't know much about admin-ing and banning people, etc., but that's always easy to catch up on.  As it is, I already spend more time on the Wiki than I do in the game...  If you guys decide to make me an admin, I'm sure I'll find more use for the tools I'm given, and if not, I won't be offended, you'll just have to keep cleaning up after me. ;)  RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 17:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I am typically just getting on the morning, and seeing Kali doing her daily round of armor projects, and image work. I tend to do the cleaning up on her images for deletion, and I feel that promoting her to housecleaning sysop would beneficial in the same manner as Ishmael.  -- [[Image:Isk8.png]]   I~sk8   (T/C) 20:23, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) much as I love the work she has been doing on the Armour Galleries page, I have to think that the tools may be somewhat un-needed. She deletes images, but she doesnt ban vandals, nor have I seen her doing much RC patrol/vandal hunt etc. May just be timezones, so i dont know. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 17:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Do admins need to be vandal hunting? Random Time 17:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No, but using only one of the tools of the trade (eg just the deletion, and occasionally), seems a somewhat waste of powers. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 17:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ishy has been promoted for that; housecleaning. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]]-- (s)talkpage  17:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You can be sure I'd be doing a lot of that. ^_^ RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 18:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Have not really seen much of her around and about.  -- Shadowphoenix  18:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) If I were to support this RfA, it would be sheerly out of good-naturedness and not due to any personal convictions. I wouldn't oppose either, though. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 18:32, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) While Rose's contributions to the Image namespace are undeniably excellent, I don't think that warrants Sysoption, nor do I think she has any particular need for those tools.  [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]]  *Defiant Elements*   +talk  20:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Would speed up the Images fixing somewhat, that's for sure. Other than those mainspace edits, though, I am not sure what RoseOfKali needs sysop tools for...I don't like the idea of promoting a user solely so they can clean up their own mess, so to speak. Dr Ishmael was originally promoted for "housecleaning", that is true...nevertheless, as I think we can all see now, he has come into his own since being promoted and uses all the tools now. I don't mean it personally, but I do not get that same sort of feeling when I think of RoseOfKali...Having said that, though, Randomtime is right that "you can never have too many", not really, especially since it's unlikely RoseOfKali would ever get involved in user conflicts etc. So I don't know. I do not feel strongly convinced to support, nor are my reasons to oppose especially acute. It also bothers me that I do not know the user personally at all, so "character" I cannot judge at this time. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 23:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)