Talk:M.O.X.

A third derv hero? Hmmm... Cress Arvein 19:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I know, I would have thought a third Mesmer would have been a higher priority :/ --GW-RM 19:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Makes sense, though, since all of the GOLEMS are Dervs... which I have never understood. Although I'm not sure why a third Mesmer would be a priority.  [[Image:Renai Mu icon.jpg|19px]]Renai Mu [[Image:Renai Mu icon.jpg|19px]] 19:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * "Due to the virtue of being a core profession" was what I meant, since they have the most skills and therefore the most possible build variation --GW-RM 19:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * But then you couldn't name him Lotus and get infinite energy (mana)!--[[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg]]ìğá†ħŕášħ 04:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Has great synergy with Gleemax. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 05:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * ZOMG RFRNCE ?!?! --Gimmethegepgun 07:10, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Hmm
In the link to a post by Regina, she said Mox has different Avatar Forms. Interesting. --- -- (s)talkpage  13:45, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

He's a PvE only Dervish Hero so unless one of his forms is an M16 assault rifle, he still failz. Pubis mcfly 03:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Magic the Gathering?
Quoting my friend on this chrom mox mox diamond mox pearl --70.181.76.135 15:24, 1 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Nothing directly related to him (unless he's fully Chromed), besides Mox. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]]-- (s)talkpage  16:14, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * There are even more Mox's that you didn't mention, including a flower. They're not related. --Shadowcrest  21:50, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note the " ZOMG RFRNCE ?!?!" above :P --Gimmethegepgun 23:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Also checked the official guild wiki, they have a "Trivia" Section put up. --70.181.76.135 04:33, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * We don't do things just because the officiwiki did, but that doesn't mean it can't be a valid note. I thought of M:tG when I saw the name, as did Giga, and there are various M:tG references scattered throughout Guild Wars already. It would help a lot to know what M.O.X. stands for. If it's like Moldy Old Xylophone, then the initials have to mean something on their own. If it actually makes sense, it could just be coincidence. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 04:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * ArenaNet developers said that it's a reference to Moxon’s Master, and the MtG reference is just coincidence. &mdash; Poki#3 [[Image:Poki.jpg|19px|My Talk Page :o]], 12:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

stuff
hey. a member of my guild keeps sayin that it will take 250granite slabs and 5 ecto to awaken him and that it will take 3 months untill a'net implemet mox into the game can any1 confirm? 90.203.203.99 18:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Seems false, no info saying that anywhere I can see Random Time  18:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Its due today afaik.. and its for anyone who has the campaigns, so I assume it won't be somthing stupid like that. Tell him to stfu till the update is released.. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 18:08, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * thanks for the info.90.203.203.99 18:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hope it's accurate Random Time  18:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

New Forms
My ass, they just reskinned him 5 times. ~Bunny 01:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Quote: "Mox's Avatar forms look different", not necessarily "good" or "interesting".[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]] Entrea   [Talk]  02:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Are we impressed?
Well, he is big, but a dervish hero? Why would we need that? Arcdash 02:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * We have all professions, Anet probably choose it randomly Random Time  05:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Having four of the same profession is redundant, so that already limits you to Mesmer, Dervish, Paragon, Assassin, Ritualist. Mes would be the best in terms of useful heroes. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 06:16, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

I wonder if his armor can be upgraded.... --◄mendel► 07:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Sad
They didn't even give him a description when you acquire him --Gimmethegepgun 03:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna make a different form chart thingy.--[[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg]]ìğá†ħŕášħ 03:49, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes they did. It said "M.O.X.". Very concise description. Cress Arvein [[Image:Cress sig.JPG]] 03:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It's too bad Avatars are idiotic on heroes because they can't use Eternal Aura, so M.O.X.'s only real distinguishing feature is wasted. Pity he doesn't launch his fists out for Wounding Strike or something. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 03:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Gallery uploaded, grenth looks best.--[[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg]]ìğá†ħŕášħ 04:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Quotes
I don't know exactly how he said em (hyphens and what not) but he says "I think, therefore I attack" and "Immolation is the sincerest form of flattery." Add it if it's fine to be like that until hyphens are added. &mdash; Powersurge360  06:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Varia
If I remember correctly, the quote "*I THINK IT WOULD BE BET-TER NOT TO DIE, DO NOT YOU*" he uses is from the movie I,Robot. --Atreyo 07:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

"hero unlocked" placement
Placing the image as it is now (floating on the right) means the article looks bad when the content is hidden (folded in) because the infobox pushes it down and separates it from its section. That also happens when the page is rendered with the box-type ad, and it is going to happen when the stub template is removed. The version with "Hero unlocked" on the left doesn't have this problem. I shrunk the image for that because Firefox is bugged in that it places the enumeration numbers under the image, so the enumeration has to start below that to be visible; and I see no reason why the image has to be shown in original size, it's not as if the reader gained any information by that. --◄mendel► 07:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speaking of image sizing, can the images of the forms be uh... maybe 15-25% bigger. He's a big guy with a lot of detail, you know? I don't want to play with the sizing, but I'm not happy with the size it is now. &mdash; Powersurge360  07:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The larger image size makes the page look fat. You can click on the image to see it bigger. Could you please point out to me where the detail actually changes for the forms, I thought all that changed was the color? --◄mendel► 08:02, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, I see the breastplate detail changes, but you can't really appreciate that more with a 20% size increase. With the size as it is now, they actually fit in a row on a 1024 pixel wide window (except on IE7, where they're inexpicably spaced further apart - gotta fix that). We don't have armor galleries on any of the other hero articles. --◄mendel► 08:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not that the detail disappears, it's that now it's only viewable in squint-o-vision. And as far as clicking on it for larger views, then what's the point of having it there at all if you'd need to click on it to get anything out of it? Why not just link? (edit conflict) And as far as armor galleries, no we don't, but this seems to me to be a unique case. They could, potentially be given their own page in the way most heroes have galleries. &mdash; Powersurge360  08:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * "Squint-o-vision" is the size we used to have on all beast infobox images. I can see that nothing but the color changes even at that size. That includes the breastplate design changes, though I can't make out the details. --◄mendel► 08:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC)