Talk:Jeweled Daggers

If you use a "Measure for Measure" inscription (i.e. highly salvageable) on these babies the chance of getting a jewel goes way up (i've gotten several). Can someone quantify "very low" anyway? --MasterPatricko 15:22, 16 November 2006 (CST)
 * I think the original statement was effective enough "The salvage rate for gems is very low" without the added "and almost never salvages to gems". I know several people who have yet to salvage one out, so I would say the chances are "low", but "almost never" is stretching it. I've gotten 2 gems out of 6 daggers without using highly salvagable inscriptions. I'll edit the article again so it's less definite in its wording until someone does a salvage batch on these things. - BeXoR  [[Image:Bexor.png]] 16:20, 16 November 2006 (CST)
 * Did the MfM inscription on it and got a Ruby on the first shot Tomoko 10:31, 20 November 2006 (CST)

Heh. Nice picture. &mdash;Aranth 00:24, 22 November 2006 (CST)

Love the picture. Hahaha.

Unconfirmed
What part of that statement is unconfirmed? - BeXoR   02:18, 12 December 2006 (CST)
 * See Measure for Measure for details Lightblade 02:36, 12 December 2006 (CST)
 * So you're saying because people aren't sure what the inscription does? I've gotten two jewels from daggers. One pair was white and the other was blue. Neither had a MfM in them. Highly salvageable has always meant that you get more of a material or a higher chance for a rare. Why would the inscription be different? - BeXoR  [[Image:Bexor.png]] 02:44, 12 December 2006 (CST)
 * you never get more than one gem from a dagger- and it seems like measure for measure only
 * raises the amount of material
 * This is incorrect; I have gotten two sapphires from a single gold pair of jeweled daggers with measure for measure on them. No SS. DeathFlame131 21:07, 1 March 2007 (CST)