Talk:Regina Buenaobra

Speculation and discussion of other people's personal life is not cool nor fair.

Jumping to conclusions and making assumptions based on circumstantial evidence is a violation of the values behind GW:NPA, even if nobody is actually "flaming".

Please keep that in mind in all future discussions.

Archived Topics
Archive 1- Side conversations

Mass Censorship
This was relevant to the community and there was considered argument from concerned parties. This should be reinstated in my opinion. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.192.60.20 (contribs).
 * It is located in the archive link above. -- [[Image:Isk8.png]] Sk8  (T / C)  22:21, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You want to rez that shitstorm? How was it helping the community? At the point it got to, it was all pointing fingers and he-said-she-said and "you're a crappy parent" and nonsense. I think it's fair to establish that statements about someone without proof is unfair. Just because person x joins movement y which is stereotypically full of z's doesn't mean that person x is a z. Ezekial Riddle 03:42, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Unless person y is me or Maui lol Lost-Blue 03:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Gah, do I have to include exceptions in my example? Ezekial Riddle 04:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)