MediaWiki talk:Blocklogentry

sc*w the blocklog. It's MediaWiki's fault for trying to be cute and parse the block entry text. To me it's more important that the Recent Changes message have direct link to the contributions page. - 06:37, 27 June 2006 (CDT)

Skuld's attempt to bold the duration doesn't get parsed on either recentchanges or the block log. --68.142.14.19 22:11, 25 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I wonder if HTML bold tags would work? --Xasxas256 22:57, 25 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Changed it to html tags, we'll see the next time someone is blocked. --Rainith 23:05, 25 July 2006 (CDT)


 * It's bolded in Special:Log/block now. --68.142.14.19 23:17, 25 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Pfffft you guys don't know what you're doing, vote to put our old admins in Category:Unfavored builds :P Consider yourselves incredibly lucky to have me and my HTML-ing ways! --Xasxas256 23:49, 25 July 2006 (CDT)
 * hehehe, I vote as a test, we block html rebels, just to make sure it works ;-P --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:54, 25 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Haven't we just settled into Adminship nicely, already picking on the little guy :P Help! Help! I'm being oppressed! Don't make me create a userbox called !!!! --Xasxas256 00:34, 26 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Forget the template, next time this happens I can shout, "Help! Help! I'm being repressed!" to protect myself! --Xasxas256 20:33, 26 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Ummm ... I hate bringing this up, as it can be viewed as opressing you further ... but isn't that image of King Arthur copyrighted material? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:50, 26 July 2006 (CDT)
 * No you don't you love bring it it up, don't make me start shouting! I've added some fair use tags on the images now. --Xasxas256 00:12, 27 July 2006 (CDT)


 * But it's not bolded in recentchanges. --68.142.14.19 16:35, 26 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Actually in recent changes you see the bold tags :( --Xasxas256 20:33, 26 July 2006 (CDT)
 * At least it works. Blocklog and Recentchanges take the same code but process them differently, so there's no chance of getting both to work perfectly. - 21:26, 26 July 2006 (CDT)

I removed the bold &mdash; Skuld 11:56, 2 August 2006 (CDT)
 * While I don't understand whyyou did it, I don't particular care either way. - 12:03, 2 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 1 day on recent changes, 1 day on block log. Was meant for recent changes and didn't work :( &mdash; Skuld 12:08, 2 August 2006 (CDT)
 * While not the best option, you could highlite the section by placing one or two asterisks on either side of the block duration. I'm actually with PanSola, I'm more or less indifferent to this, just tossing out ideas if anyone was still wanting some sort of flag here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 12:44, 2 August 2006 (CDT)