Talk:Barbarous Slice

Depending on the way you use your warrior (build not based on constant stances), and the damage and bleed progression tables, this could be a far better skill than Sever Artery at the cost of 2 extra strikes of adren. I'm liking the looks of most of these skills so far :D -Gares 09:43, 22 September 2006 (CDT) I think gash just got a new friend...sword spike ftw.-Onlyashadow 09:56, 2 October 2006 (CDT)

How does this work with Berserker Stance? Does the bleeding trigger, or not? - The Unrealist 06:12, 14 October 2006 (CDT)
 * and charging strike...? Phool 06:16, 24 October 2006 (CDT)

Skill is horrible now, no stance requirement = I don't want to know you.-Onlyashadow, Top 100 Guild 14:39, 20 October 2006 (CDT)


 * It's only less than awesome now because Nightfall has stances that are worth a damn (and it's about time). HeWhoIsPale 09:23, 25 October 2006 (CDT)


 * rampage as one, anyone? To answer my only comment on CS... it would be pointless. Phool 16:35, 16 November 2006 (CST)


 * Rampage is a Skill, not a stance. The Unrealist 05:30, 5 December 2006 (CST)


 * Which is why it's good with Barbarous Slice -- Hyperion` 17:12, 5 December 2006 (CST)

Anyone know what the rate is for a successful hit with this skill? I'm getting about every 5th use to cause bleeding. Has that been your experience? At that rate I'd be better off using Sever Artery. Adversion 18:38, 25 February 2007 (CST)
 * Not sure what you're asking. Attacks have no inherent chance to miss.  As the description says, it causes bleeding if you're not in a stance.  --Fyren 19:29, 25 February 2007 (CST)
 * I don't use stances... but my question was whether it was supposed to cause bleeding with each use, because it has a very low success ratio for me personally. I'm just trying to figure out if I'd be better off using sever artery instead. Adversion 19:34, 25 February 2007 (CST)
 * Assuming you aren't in a stance, it should cause bleeding each time you use it. Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs)