Talk:Domination Magic

Something should be done about this. This article should be changed to Domination Magic (Quest) or the other one to Domination Magic (Attribute) --Geeman 08:20, 1 Aug 2005 (EST)

Nevermind me. This has already been done. --Fyren 19:37, 1 Aug 2005 (EST)

Disambiguation page or not?
I believe this is wrong. I think Domination Magic should point to the attribute since 90% of the references and searches are for that, and then the parenthese go to the Quest. We can place a note in the Attribute page that says there is a quest with that name for those lost. --Karlos 10:39, 27 Sep 2005 (EST)
 * Wow. It's late February and I just noticed this. I agree. --130.58 09:54, 25 February 2006 (CST)
 * Blah, I ditto. -PanSola 04:39, 26 February 2006 (CST)
 * Problem with that is this article seems to be on a spambot's "attack list." I'd much rather protect a diambig. page than an attribute page, as nothing really needs to be added to this page, unless they make something else in the game and name it Domination Magic.  --Rainith 10:38, 26 February 2006 (CST)
 * I prefer having a disambiguation page here; but most of the articles that link to this page should be fixed to bypass it and go directly to the article (for example, each skill should link directly to the attribute article instead of to here). --161.88.255.140 00:42, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * I ackownledge Rainith's concern, but still agree with Karlos and 130.58. The Domination attribute article is pretty complete, with rarely any edits, so I don't see protection would be a major problem.  You can eitehr tell ppl to post their edits to the talk page, or make a editcopy. -PanSola 00:48, 28 February 2006 (CST)

Hot vandalism target
Nearly all of recent edits to this article have been reversions of vandalism and spamming. As this page seems fairly final in its design, perhaps it's time to protect it? &mdash; Stabber 23:08, 23 February 2006 (CST)
 * I wonder what makes this page such a preferred target for spammers and vandals. It looks like any other page to me. -- 23:15, 23 February 2006 (CST)
 * That would be the word "Domination," which triggers spambots because of the sexual association. --130.58 01:40, 25 February 2006 (CST)
 * Heh, pwned d-: -PanSola 01:46, 25 February 2006 (CST)
 * Protected. --Rainith 07:30, 25 February 2006 (CST)

Article name
This messes up the attribute box, can't we move this to domination magic and put a see also link 195.137.4.228 14:15, 23 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Considering that 99% of the time, you do mean the attribute, not the quest, and considering how many links to the disambiguation page I've had to change, and considering how Protection Prayers and Protection Prayers (quest) are set up, I really think we should just make Domination Magic refer to the attribute and just have a little note at the top that points to the quest. --adeyke 18:37, 23 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Thirded. See also Talk:Domination Magic. That article needs to be unprotected by an admin first. I doubt the spambots will be returning any time soon, what with the Captcha and all. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 18:39, 23 April 2006 (CDT)


 * My bot is making this move now. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 19:19, 23 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Done! &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 19:44, 23 April 2006 (CDT)

Should Punishment Spells have a seperate list?
I like to think that I have a good grasp on Punishment builds, but I know a lot of people just don't get the idea behind it. Couple with the fact that not many people use Mesmers (IMHO) and that, when they do, it is a secondary for Echo, why don't we help clue people in with a list of Punishment Skills for all Mesmer spells? Why not go one better, and maybe put one up for all classes? --Carnival King 02:49, 6 December 2006 (CST)

I don't know, it seems a bit obvious. And it might be subjective as to what a punishment skill actually is. Tycn 03:07, 8 February 2007 (CST)
 * This idea could be expanded on the Punish page that's currently out there. It's a pretty measly stub at the moment. --Zampani 12:00, 8 February 2007 (CST)

Incorrect description
I am not sure that I am allowed to make the change. But I think that the description should also read that Interuption works on Chants as well and not just spells.--User:Bambeastie. 1:00. 27 July 2007

Biased
Very important? Perhaps most important? I have to disagree. I'd say any mesmer attribute is just as "important" as any other. It should be changed to be less biased, imo.--Darksyde  17:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This is the most used attribute, simply because Illusion sucks and Inspiration is only for e-management or Teaseway heros. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 23:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Needs to mention Visions of Regret, since that's the single most used mesmer elite in existence. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 23:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My dom mes prefers to echo empathy, backfire, or Pain Inverter depending on the foe. I feel that has more versatility despite potentially targeting less foes. -User:PanSola (talk to the [[Image:follower of Lyssa.png]]) 23:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, well I'm glad you're the only mesmer in existence. That makes it easier. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 23:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * My previous post did not state you are wrong or anything >_> -User:PanSola (talk to the [[Image:follower of Lyssa.png]]) 00:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Neither did mine <_< [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 00:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merited or unmerited bias aside, this page needs revision. Power Spike is not popular, and I am too new of a player to remember a time when it was.  I'm going to change some things. Lazuli  00:48, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ...............yes it is. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 01:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok. I changed some things while keeping the general structure intact.  The article referred to skills that very few people use (Mind Wrack, Signet of Weariness, etc), so I changed those around and included more commonly and successfully employed skills without bordering on flavor-of-the-month-ism, at least in my opinion.  Tell me what you think.  I'm sure more could, and probably should, be done. Lazuli  01:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * And I was surprised to find we don't have a shutdown page. Thoughts on making one?  It could be as simple as similar pages.  I'm blanking here, but something along the lines of bar compression.  Succinct. Lazuli  01:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * ...........no it isn't. That is to say, I respectfully disagree.  Where do you see Power Spike used? Lazuli  01:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * On Heroes. On Warriors. Everywhere. 5e interrupt with fast recharge time is win. No one uses pleak anymore because e-denial is barely viable at all. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 01:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

To note, Illusion is VERY powerful in terms of antimelee and (by extention) PvE. &mdash; Powersurge360  01:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I would argue that Power Leak has been a staple in Domination Mesmer builds in GvG for a long time. Of course, GvG isn't everything.  Energy denial is hardly viable if it's the only thing the build is doing, like those one-trick-pony Me/N's or N/Me's with Malaise and similar hexes.  Energy Burn, Energy Surge, and Power Leak are fantastic because they do other useful things besides deny energy.  I'm not belittling the value of Power Spike, but look at it this way.  The ~100 damage from Power Spike can be remedied with a 5 energy heal.  Power Leak drains around 14 energy. Lazuli  01:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Skill denial will always be the better form of shutdown. I can't remember the last time I've had PLeak on my bar. In 4v4 I usually run a Psychic Instability build, and in GvG or higher I run a PBlock/PLock build. Plus, PLock recharges faster and can be used more skillfully than PLeak. &mdash; Powersurge360  01:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Is it ironic that I defend Power Leak yet I don't use it either? I favor Power Drain and Fry of Crustacean.  But then again, I rarely venture into high level pvp. Lazuli  01:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) lol, you said "Cry of Crustacean" &mdash; Powersurge360  01:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Fry, actually. Which is even more clever. Lazuli  01:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)