User talk:Mariano

Hi. Could you please stop spamming Talk:Conjure Nightmare. You are filling the recent changes with your edits. Please use the 'minor change' checkbox for those edits and don't submit the changes before you are 100% ready with your text. To see how your changes look like, use the 'Show Preview' button next to the 'Save page' button. -- 06:37, 9 July 2006 (CDT)

Sorry for the problem I may be causing you... I have ended with the editing, as I am satisfied with it now. By the way, in my view, I have been being very bold, not spamming. Please, think that 1 hour of inconvenience to you will save of annoyements to many others who will read it later... {smile} smile please! --mariano 06:56, 9 July 2006 (CDT)

Oh... I see {embarrased} the history now shows a long list of interventions by me... Sorry for that, with such a problem, I may not be able to contribute to this wiki... as I use to edit things many times just for minor changes... but, wait, you mean that a minor change would not be recorded in the history? --mariano 07:23, 9 July 2006 (CDT)

I see minor changes are still recorded with a m added --mariano 07:28, 9 July 2006 (CDT)

So this is a dilemma: either to spam history being bold or being dull to avoid spamming history...--mariano 07:31, 9 July 2006 (CDT)

I am not 100% ready with my text, neither this one not other, it just that life goes on, and have to do other things. To ask people to be 100% satisfied is a metaphysical petition, which may be no one being humble might feel able to be able to accomplish. --mariano 07:35, 9 July 2006 (CDT)

I may be a phylosopher, I write about Language Science and Phylosophy on the internet. --mariano 07:35, 9 July 2006 (CDT)

So I may know what I am talking about when I talk about language use and metaphysics {smile} --mariano 07:36, 9 July 2006 (CDT)

I am not a native English writer as many may notice, that is why I have to edit some times, others I edit because the logic on the language I have used. I may not change other persons writtings. --mariano 07:38, 9 July 2006 (CDT)


 * OK, in the last half hour, you have edited your talk page 10 times. You even edited (twice!) as I was submitting this comment the first time. Only one of these edits was marked as minor. 1: please don't save the page until you've said all you mean to say in the way you mean to say it. 2: please use the "this is a minor edit" checkbox for all changes (like the past 10) that are minor. People checking the recent changes can choose to hide minor edits. --Kiiron 07:40, 9 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Only 1 was minor.


 * Two different things here. First, yes, that little (m) of minor edits is better than nothing, since users can choose to filter minor edits from the Recent Changes page, making it easier for them to find important edits. Secondly, while that's usually enough, a certain amount of pacing yourself is needed as well. For example, look at this very page. Since Gem left his message, you've edited this page not once, not twice, not even thrice, but ELEVEN different times. Maybe try to leave an edit page open in the background for a bit, until you're moderately confident you've added all you needed to add? This avalanche of edits simply makes everything way more confusing than it needs to be. Philosophy is about being concise and to the point, isn't it? :) --Dirigible 07:55, 9 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Dirigible, thank you for your explanation.


 * "Gem", be aware that, in my view, you make the same faults that you are attributing to me... in my view this:


 * "Hi. Could you please stop spamming Talk:Conjure Nightmare. You are filling the recent changes with your edits. Please use the 'minor change' checkbox for those edits and don't submit the changes before you are 100% ready with your text. To see how your changes look like, use the 'Show Preview' button next to the 'Save page' button."


 * is nothing else than a loose talk without much clues about what you intend to say... they look to me commands: do this! do that!


 * You may know that I do not understand what you mean... because, you know my behaviour, but, you too do not know how to put it for me to understand it; be sure that reprimending and making statements is not the way. With my sucessives intervetions in this web page which has as is title User talk: Mariano -I somewhat feel that given the title it may not be questioned what I do in it, particularly when it is started with a reprimant- I was trying to make you understand that I am person, and your inconsistency in critizing someone who you do not know still enough. Some of my previous statements in this web page are about me, and any of them is a major change at least as relevantly as your talk is relevant. {smile}


 * By the way, I feel a bit annoyed by you, I still do not understand what do you intend to tell to me, what matter does it whether the history is longer? Why does matter to marque something as minor change has been explained by Dirigible. Why did not write you such explanation? As long as I am not able to understand I stop my contributions to this wiki... until I get the point, where there any, of what you say. And if what I understand is that there is not point on it... well, in this case my knowledge about you would have grown.


 * I have taken this in a personal manner, because this web page refers to my person --mariano 08:45, 9 July 2006 (CDT)