Talk:Guide to Aggro

This is rather objective and not factual. It will need a major clean up and a lot of unneeded sentences will be removed. The main space articles are meant to be factual and straight to the point, if you want to write a humourous article, see Humor. Silver Sunlight 23:38, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Who says mainspace articles can't be funny? If it's both informative and entertaining, it's much better than a boring article that says the same thing.[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]] Entrea   [Talk]  00:03, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This is just a bit overkill. The guides are generally in a very bad shape and by allowing people to insert something just for the sake of being funny, will make them even worse. Silver Sunlight [[Image:SSunlight.jpg|19px]] 00:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I hate to admit it, Silver Sunlight has a point. I'll see about giving it a more professional appearance.  Professional doesn't have to mean no humor, professional does mean about 98% less humor than this has currently.  (Imagine you were drawing up a paper for presentation to customers.  You may include some humor, but as much as is here currently, no.)   Besides, a partial rewrite will do it good.  You are currently looking at the work from 3 sittings of effort, with a final once-over in the 3rd sitting.  I can see I still missed a lot of tpyos and broken grammar, and that concept of aggro radius got left out of where it's most useful.  It's mentioned, just not by name.  Yamagawa 01:33, 5 October 2008 (UTC)