User talk:Optime Doom

Spam
First! Heya mate, welcome to the one (good) Wiki! :-) Gimme a shout if you want help with anything, I know wiki code, lol. -->Suicidal Tendencie 22:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

ohai
Beat that --> Suicidal Tendencie 17:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There'll be a userbox about this soon, I do not doubt it. --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 18:03, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Removed because: No. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 18:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Re-added from your amazing userspace, Warwick. ST, the userbox will be about you posting huge ASCII arts without the proper precautions (and without first soliciting Warwick's advice, who is our resident authority on intelligent spam). Archiving is no longer imminently needed. -- ◄mendel► 18:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * so liek I herd spamspam was srsbznezz --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 18:42, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Mendel, I am disappointed at your use of the word "imminently" which implies ignoring half of what I said, notably on your own talk page
 * Also... I dunno... we're getting there again =) --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 19:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Greetings fellow Wikian
Please consider archiving in the near future. While your talk page is not of an excessive size yet, some Wikians may encounter difficulty when attempting to edit your talkpage due to the large amount of coding involved. Thank you for your consideration. --> Suicidal Tendencie 18:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Suicidal, you're an arse :P --[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]]El_Nazgir 18:03, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Who? Me? --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 18:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Blowing up someone else's userpage and then telling them to archive? Scaring away new editors, you are! -- ◄mendel► 18:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * New? I would question that notion, if I may. Look when I welcomed him, found earlier on this page. He is not new in the slightest. I did not tell them to archive, I merely asked him to be aware of the burden some users may feel when editing his page. I also did not suggest it was an immediate concern; merely something to be aware of. --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 18:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No. adding 83kb in 1 post is dumb, and then telling them to archive is.. dumber. Even if it was intended as a joke, it was a bad one. The mighty castle of Warwick is not amused. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 18:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Mendel. You talk like yoda. from no one I call you Moda TUM TUM TUM! (*dramatic chord*) -- [[Image:F4Sig.jpg|19px]]  † F1 ©  Talk  18:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Pfft, castle. Given enough worker ants and enough time, even the most stalward defenders of a castle will be forced to give up and surrender, due to the sheer bordom of killing ants constantly. --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 18:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * ST, one - wikian is insulting - it implies that you want to be on wikia, instead of being forced, please use guildwikian
 * Two, telling someone to archive after spamming their userpage is insulting, and unnecessary, stop it Random Time  18:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * RT, forgive me, but you are somewhat ignorant of the fact me and OptimeDoom are good friends who have known each other a long time. Ban me if you will, but I'd recommend talking to Optime the "victim" as I would be most surprised if I had annoyed / upset him. --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 18:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm a noob at wiki he was only helping me &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Optime Doom (contribs) 18:50, 12 March 2009.
 * :( Now I feel bad, and stuipd Random Time  18:52, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * (EC x 2 -.-) Oh, and I would beg you to refrain from double standards if at all possible.
 * wikian implies you want to be on wikia
 * 1) No it does not? What do people on wikipedia call each other? wikipedians? I'm inclined to doubt that
 * 2) You ask me to avoid being insulting, then insult Wikia, who I am on good terms with (not exactly well known to each other, but I am not amused at your hidden jibe at them) --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 18:54, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Moar talkies:
 * I don't want you to feel bad, but you have to see the... irony... when you ask me not to insult anyone when you go and do just that yourself. I'm certainly not deeply offended, but I imagine I would be somewhat hurt if I was working in Wikia and saw this.
 * What you seemingly fail to acknowledge is that the staff are doing the best they can for us, and the decision of a few people who'll never read anything you say about Wikia is not something you should wave in the faces of people who did not have a say in the matter. --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 18:59, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) wikipedians are called wikipedo's :P 2) We had no way of knowing that you and Optime were friends. 3) after finally understanding what you meant on my userpage, I'll post it here again: "Putting a huge thingy like that and telling him to archive classifies someone as an (albeit not serious or negative) arsehole. It's the kind of friendly neighborhood arse that's great fun to spend time with and that plays practical jokes on people all the time."--[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]]El_Nazgir 19:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Haha, thanx, but as usual, I was involved so half the site got in a big argument :(
 * 1) no u
 * 2) No, but I wanted to make the point before being banned, Optime's response on MSN was "lol" not "oi, fuck off"
 * 3) And I have most ironically forgotten why I wanted that on this page in the first place, my apologies. I imagine it was planned to be in a different section and I'd some amusing comment or whatnot, oh well. If anything comes to mind I'll add it, dinner time, enjoy the confusion =) --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 19:05, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Just 'cause you're friends doesn't prevent it from being disruptive. --JonTheMon 19:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Jon, some people deliberately try to spam on the site to annoy people for the fun of it. I showed my friend something. Is the goal of your edit not important when the edit is being judged?
 * distruptive: It was on a talkpage, this argument is weak from my point of view
 * --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 19:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Just because something isn't supposed to be disruptive doesn't mean it doesn't become disruptive. Part of my consideration is El Nazgir's talk page. And disruption happens quite often on talk pages. --JonTheMon 19:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * We worked through a misunderstanding. I bear no will to El Nazgir, and would be surprised if this was not mutual. I fail to see the grand evil I have accomplished. --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 19:48, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

while it has been worked out, keep in mind in the future that this was disruptive. --JonTheMon 19:50, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * While you clearly hold this believe, keep in mind you have failed to explain to me how this is so --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 19:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * belief Random Time  19:52, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * * * =) --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 19:55, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Typically i judge disruption by how much ink is spilled. and looking at RC, a lot has been. --JonTheMon 19:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I concur with Jon. See also: "so half the site got in a big argument"  Jink  20:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * (EC) Then I am disappointed; we never will see eye to eye. I'm most disappointed that no matter what the reason is, we are seemingly expected to write as little as possible, and the usertalk pages are clearly not what I thought they were. I would add, however, that I was showing a friend of mine something.
 * I did not force someone to RV my vandalism, people joined a conversation, there is a difference --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 20:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OH COME ON!
 * Fine, time to tell it like it is.
 * I showed MY FRIEND something on HIS TALK PAGE. That half the site decided to start talking about it, including your dear selves, cannot possibly be my responsability.
 * For example, take yourself Jink. Everyone who reads this has an opinion on it. By Jon's standards, you are calling disruption in RC, which Jon wants to remain black. --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 20:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It's fine that you showed your friend something. That got worked out. It's just the result of that is a disruption. RC can fill up, it shouldn't be full with a topic like this. At this point, your tone is slightly exasperated, which is understandable. Just calm down, understand where we're coming from, and drop it. --JonTheMon 20:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I would like to make the point now that I am *not* trying to cause aggro for everyone, but one thing just rubs me the wrong way
 * drop it - you have to understand I honestly, for the life of me, cannot see what I have done wrong, yet I get a smack on the hand, then get told to never mention it again
 * which is understandable - Thank you for that --> Suicidal Tendencie [[Image:Suicidal_Tendencie_Sig.jpg]] 20:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I would say the initial disruption was putting the piplup on the page + the El_Nazgir's talk. So, in the future don't put something huge like that on someone's talk, and be more clear when you want someone to talk somewhere else. --JonTheMon 20:16, 12 March 2009 (UTC)