GuildWiki:Software and technical issues/Bugs

Please make note of any bugs you encounter in the wiki here. Click edit and follow the directions in the text area that appears.

Can't find your bug? Maybe it has been Resolved.

Pages not updating
Page: Special:Recentchanges and other pages

Problem: 2 part problem, first changes are not showing up in Special:Recentchanges, at all. Looks like the last change was made at 6:56pm PDT. (This could be very bad if we got hit with a spambot attack right now.) Also pages are not showing edits made to them until you refresh your browser's cache (at least this is what is happening to me).

Submitted By: --Rainith 21:37, 8 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Part 1 is a feature, not a bug. Gravewit fixed the server time, which involved rolling back the server time by 14 hours or so.  However this change isn't retroactive, so "newer" changes are found earlier, set your recentchanges to dispaly 1000 changes from the last 2 days will enable you to see stuff..  Part 2 is probably related to teh same thing.  If the browser's cached copy was last modified April 9th, and the copy on server was last modified April 8th, the browser decides to just not do the fetch. -PanSola 22:46, 8 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Ah, I see. I have to say it is nice to finally have the server time be correct.... no more having to adjust the time by X hours a 3 minutes.  --Rainith 23:04, 8 April 2006 (CDT)

GuildWiki is the target of spambot zombies
Page: Many (see recent history)

Problem: A spamminion master has been using his army of zombies to spam his urls everywhere.

Submitted By: 05:22, 28 March 2006 (CST)

Possible Fix: SpamBlacklist


 * I've gotten SBL to install on my test mediawiki installation without too much trouble. 05:22, 28 March 2006 (CST)


 * An easier way to take care of the problem is to disallow anonymous edits. -- James Sumners 22:12, 28 March 2006 (CST)


 * You think that will really help? A load of them post by name. 22:30, 28 March 2006 (CST)


 * Hmm, I hadn't really been keeping up with the spam posted here so I didn't realize they were using accounts. -- James Sumners 00:40, 29 March 2006 (CST)
 * I would estimate that at least 95% of the spam and vandalism is posted from anonymous IPs. Just look at Special:Log/block to see a list of users that have been banned for varying amounts of time. --161.88.255.140 01:03, 29 March 2006 (CST)
 * Of course, if you did require a logged in account, that could just make the spam harder to police. Currently, you can look at the Special:Recentchanges and give special attention to anon postings.  Requiring logged in accounts just requires the spammer to write a script to automatically walk through the set-up screens for creating accounts.  Spam continues, but the likely candidates for extra scrutiny are harder to spot. --161.88.255.140 01:15, 29 March 2006 (CST)
 * Oh yeh, every IP edit I see is a potential spam edit, yay for paranoia! 01:49, 29 March 2006 (CST)
 * Sadly, that is how I react to IP posts. I certainly don't consider all IP posters to be spammers, actually very few IPS posters are spammers, but most spammers are IP posters (and yes, I see the irony in my using an IP address) --161.88.255.140 07:11, 29 March 2006 (CST)


 * I disagree with IP-based blocking on principle. It makes the baby Wikisus cry. Filter the spam, not the potential spammer. 01:07, 29 March 2006 (CST)


 * I agree with Stabber, just look at the flow of Spammer. Has it ceased? Has it decreased? Has all the blocking actually made Skuld feel any safer? :) I don't know what that SBL thing does (and no Stabber I didn't click on the link), but I imagine it basically reviews submitted edits to prevent the Spam edits from taking place, regardless of IPs. --Karlos 07:02, 29 March 2006 (CST)


 * Bump! SpamBlacklist is an utterly trivial 90% solution to spam links. F G 22:42, 6 April 2006 (CDT)
 * Looks like it is included in MediaWiki 1.6. Now if only we could get an upgrade... -- James Sumners 00:18, 7 April 2006 (CDT)


 * We've been using BadBehavior for a long time. Gravewit 04:37, 7 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Interesting, but that doesn't really address the issue of spam zombies. Can I truly not talk you into installing SpamBlacklist? It is simply a matter of:
 * Editing  to add:
 * Editing  to add:

require_once( "$IP/extensions/SpamBlacklist/SpamBlacklist.php" ); $wgSpamBlacklistFiles = array( "http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spam_blacklist&action=raw&sb_ver=1", // Wikimedia's list "DB: guildwiki_db_name GuildWiki:Spam_blacklist",   // our list );
 * Creating Spam blacklist and adding all the stupid spam URLs like the gayhomes.net one.
 * Should take five minutes tops! &mdash; Stabber (talk) 05:16, 7 April 2006 (CDT)


 * For some reason enabling SpamBlacklist gives me the "cannot modify headers" error(s). I've tried it without BadBehavior, and a bunch of other ways, I can't quite get it working. Gravewit 08:46, 9 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Hmm... I did exactly what I said above with a test vanilla MediaWiki 1.6.1 installation and didn't get those errors. Checking the source now to see what would cause "cannot modify headers" errors... &mdash; Stabber (talk) 08:53, 9 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Grepping is drawing a blank. What was the exact error message? &mdash; Stabber (talk) 09:01, 9 April 2006 (CDT)

Selecting skins prevents login
Page: All on site

Problem: I was playing with my account preferences (timezone, etc) and saw the option for skins. I selected one to see what it looked like, and clicked "Save". Now the only way that I can access the site is by deleting the cookie for gw.gamewikis.org. Once I attempt to login again, the cookie is re-created, I am unable to access the site, and I receive the following error message: Fatal error: Cannot redeclare class skinmonobook in /usr/home/guildwiki/public_html/skins/MonoBook.php on line 25

Comments: While I knew to delete the cookies in order to regain access, how many users have done the same as me and did not know to delete the cookie? I realize that for the technical minded out there, it's hard to imagine anyone not knowing to do that; but there are a lot of people whose only thought when cookies are mentioned is wondering if they're penut-butter or chocolate chip. I can't help but wonder how many might be out there that lost access to the wiki due to this bug, and now are effectively blocked from even viewing it anymore. --161.88.255.140 00:45, 8 March 2006 (CST) (username: "161.88.x.x")

Submitted By: --161.88.255.140 06:45, 4 March 2006 (CST) (my username is: "161.88.x.x")


 * PanSola here. I just ran into the same problem, and can't log in to my account anymore...  If this bug isn't fixed I'd have to create a new account... -24.7.179.183 15:00, 17 March 2006 (CST)


 * I posted a note on both Gravewit's and Nunix's talk pages to try to get their attention about this. Unfortunately I don't know what else to do.  --Rainith 15:09, 17 March 2006 (CST)
 * EDIT - And I left him a PM on the GWG forums. --Rainith 15:15, 17 March 2006 (CST)


 * I can't figure this one out. I've been messing with it off and on for awhile, and if you google search it, we show up in the top of the list ; p 71.193.99.44 06:52, 7 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Is this still affecting people? The problem seems to be when you make your own skin but don't change the class name. I can delete the skin you made, and that will fix the login problem. Gravewit 08:53, 9 April 2006 (CDT)

(Not so) Special pages
Page: Special:Specialpages

Problem: The Special pages page seems to be missing all the normal special pages. I see the Admin special pages, but none of the normal ones.

Comments: Someone else mentioned this somewhere, but I wanted to put in an official report.

Submitted By: Rainith 16:56, 12 February 2006 (CST)

Notes:


 * I get this problem too - I cannot see ANY of the Special pages (not an admin). This just seems to be since we moved to the new server... Kidburla 22:52, 13 February 2006 (CST)
 * it was me and I can't remember where. still all blankety -_- 00:06, 20 February 2006 (CST)
 * They're back 04:44, 23 February 2006 (CST)
 * Still having a problem with them. Seems I can get them to show up by refreshing the page a few times.  --Rainith 04:50, 23 February 2006 (CST)
 * I get the same problem. For me it seems to depend on which page I am on when I click the link. Doesnt seem to make sense. --Xeeron 20:24, 23 February 2006 (CST)
 * For me the Special pages page is ALWAYS blank, ever since the problem started. -PanSola 11:21, 1 March 2006 (CST)

In the meantime I figured out what some of them are called, and put them under Specialpages. -PanSola 17:28, 2 March 2006 (CST)


 * This seems to work for me now. It's been working every time since I upgraded to 1.6.1. Can anyone clear their cache, test it, and confirm? Gravewit 08:54, 9 April 2006 (CDT)

Mis-floating Categories
Page: Previewing some pages.

Problem: Sometimes in preview, the bar showing the categories will float on top of the edit box for the article. Adjacent is an example.

Comments: This is reminicent of the old problem we had with the About Disclaimr bar. I am sorry, it does not appear consistently so I cannot pin one article where it always happens.

Submitted by: --Karlos 17:12, 1 November 2005 (EST)


 * Is this still happening occasionally? Gravewit 08:56, 9 April 2006 (CDT)

Missing email reply
Problem: Created a new user account, entered an email address and followed link to confirm email address. Clicked on button which appeared and message claimed a confirmatory email had been sent. None actually received.

Submitted By: Rhess 07:45, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Problem Continues: Same as above. Checked my profile, my email address is correct there. Is there a problem with the mail-bot?

Submitted By: Purple Recluse 17:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Anyone else have this happen recently (since the server move)? Gravewit 02:40, 23 February 2006 (CST)


 * I changed my mail address a while ago but no confirm ever came through, that could be because I don't have access to skuld@@@simsational,,,co,,uk, my old address, =( 18:36, 20 March 2006 (CST)

Comments: Yes, the page will not send emails to any of my email accounts upon request. (By changing or activation.) --Nilles 01:52, 2 April 2006 (CST)