User talk:Cwingnam2000

talk page comments
please don't forget to sign your comments on talk pages by appending "--~" at the end --Honorable Sarah 11:35, 25 August 2006 (CDT)


 * testing --Cwingnam2000 11:37, 25 August 2006 (CDT)

Hey, i added "nocat=true" to the email boxes so it doesn't attempt to create these catogories for you :] Hope you dont mind :]]] --Woonack 19:37, 26 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Thanks --Cwingnam2000 19:40, 26 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Also thanks for fixing my page :) --Woonack [[Image:Warrior-icon-small.png]] 13:28, 27 August 2006 (CDT)

Try and put all you comments in 1 edit, rather than in 3 consecutive edits. --8765 17:50, 3 September 2006 (CDT)

Delete tag needed?
You have a couple pages in your user space that are nothing but redirects. I spotted these while reviewing Special:DoubleRedirects. Do you have any objections to deleting these: If it's okay to delete, just tag them with. Thanks! --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:13, 26 August 2006 (CDT)
 * User:Cwingnam2000/Canthan_Progression_Test
 * User:Cwingnam2000/Cantha_Progression

Testing Sig
-- Silver Fang 09:12, 30 August 2006 (CDT)

Can you leave your wiki user name instead of silver fang please? It's confusing :( &mdash; Skuld 09:16, 30 August 2006 (CDT)

Done -- Cwingnam2000 09:18, 30 August 2006 (CDT)

Mission progression
I edited your template so that it doesn't make use of the switch or case templates (or your image chooser template). It's easier to change the images to match the parameters than use template logic. --Fyren 07:43, 31 August 2006 (CDT)

Currently Testing the Viability of…
Thanks for all your contributions on my above named section. I requested reviews from Rapta and 55, so it helps a lot to know that I can get some help with this without having to personaly ask everyone :) Thanks again.--Azroth 12:28, 7 September 2006 (CDT)
 * NP, im just comment on things that i know. -- [[Image:Ritualist-icon-small.png]] Cwingnam2000 14:55, 7 September 2006 (CDT)


 * Ok, I changed some stuff around and made a new A/Rt set up. Would you run though the list again and let me know what you think.  In particular, I really need help with the Bestial Strike build.  55 says its good but I need a little more info before I post it (read my last two comments on it).  Also, if you know anyone on the wiki who would be willing to help out, would you drop them a line.  I spread some requests around but the response has been much worse than I hoped, and I need some more perspectives and comments before I submit any of them.  Thanks a lot.--Azroth 20:40, 9 September 2006 (CDT)

RE: Your suggestion on GuildWiki talk:Builds
Can you please look at your suggestion again and: That would help people reading your suggestion a lot, thx. --Xeeron 08:21, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Considerably shorten it (it is much longer compared to the other suggestions, I feel it could be summarized in less words, for example, do away with the listing of categories, which is already present at the top of the discussion)
 * Decide on one way of nomination method (currently your suggestion is in fact 3 suggestions)
 * Explain clearly the difference between your suggestion and the other 2 double stage screening suggestions.