User talk:Dr ishmael/Archive 4

Lolpreview
Even though most of those edits are normal or human-bot-mode. But that's not the point ;) --- -- (s)talkpage  16:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yay, new userboxes are always shiney! :D  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 17:47, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * And actually, I do use show preview somewhat often, but I usually don't bother with it on smaller edits ("What could I possibly have messed up with that little change?" >.>) or when using templates I think I'm familiar with. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 17:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Glad you like it (even though you altered it to a little less blunt ;) ). I generally use Show Preview when I make an edit with a ton of links, cause I often flunk those >.> And when I use several indents, to make it look at least a little good (i.e., not one word on a new line, then starting a new paragraph. Looks blehh) ^^' --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]]-- (s)talkpage  18:38, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Less blunt and more accurate. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 19:48, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Lies. All lies. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]]-- (s)talkpage  19:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * LIES AND SLANDER! (with a hint of pie!) Jink 20:09, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * What about cake? Random Time  20:15, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The cake is a lie, of course. Duh. Jink 20:18, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Cake is fine with me. It's Pie that can control me...  I should not have said that.--[[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg]]ìğá†ħŕášħ  20:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Someone make a Pie MTG card --Gimmethegepgun 20:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Entrea pie card.jpg|100px]] Someone made one! YAY! --Gimmethegepgun 00:58, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Viper, I hate to disappoint you, but if you run your browser fullscreen, you should experiment with shrinking it to a window and playing with the width. Unless you are inside a block with a fixed width, preferably in em or ex, you can't predict how many words will be on that line for the next viewer. If you must avoid single word lines, don't use plain space between the last three words of a paragraph, use &amp;nbsp; instead.
 * --◄mendel► 21:01, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I know that. I run windowed, cause I like the taskbar, so to say >.>
 * Still, as long as it's aesthetically pleasing to me, it's fine to me. However obvious you find that statement, I leave to you. Besides, remembering some obscure command is hard for lazy people ;) --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]]-- (s)talkpage  21:34, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not obscure. & nbsp; = non-breaking space. The ampersand sets off the code, and the semi-colon ends it. &mdash; Powersurge360  21:53, 16 August 2008 (UTC)


 * & rarr; = Right Arrow (larr = Left Arrow etc). Which is logical. nbsp is just some string of letters to me. Oh, and somehow a part of my message above got left out O_o" I don't exactly recall what's missing, but it involved resolution (since that also matters). --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]]-- (s)talkpage  08:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Why?
Doesn't harm anyone last time I checked... --- -- (s)talkpage  17:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Because Rose said I should. >.> I guess it does just clutter RC even more than I'm already doing, though.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 18:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, she only is saying "I want (emphasis on want) it just in the Upload log, so I remove the Summary", not "It shouldn't show up on the page besides the log". --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]]-- (s)talkpage  19:20, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, I just like pinning the blame on other people. <.< &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 19:32, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, I've seen people get upset at other uploaders and myself for renaming their images without credit. And leaving the note in the Summary (which is placed automatically, unfortunately) is not right.  But, I guess, afterall, we can always slap them with "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." So yeah, it's just a courtesy thing, nothing else. Like I said before, I try to do it for the "good" images that will likely be permanent, but usually don't bother with placeholders. RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 17:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * If that line of text is in the summary, you're giving them credit, right? Don't see why it isn't "right", but might just be me. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]]-- (s)talkpage  17:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Leaving it in the Summary isn't right, because the Summary should reflect the essence of the image, not who uploaded it. You're basically saying "This is an image that was originally uploaded by so-and-so."  This is NOT a good summary for an image.  The upload log is the only place that keeps track of who uploaded an image, and if it has the second uploader's name with the original uploader's name next to it, I think that's the proper way to do it, or don't do it at all.  RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 18:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The essence of the image is usually given in the form of a caption on pages it's used, explanation (talk pages) or it's so dead-obvious it's not necessary to have a summary saying "this is a pic of X doing Y" though. --Shadowcrest  18:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, in most cases, yes, it is dead-obvious, and there shouldn't be a summary at all. I don't see why a single enty to RC makes such a big difference.  Anyway, there's no point in discussing this so much, it's personal preference, and I will continue doing it, but others don't have to.  RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 21:41, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to do it for the armor gallery reuploading so I don't kill RC. This way I only create two entries per image (delete/upload) instead of three (delete/upload/edit).  Both deletions and uploads are easy to skip over in RC because the line is formatted differently, doubly so if you use Enhanced RC, but single edits to many different articles aren't.