User talk:Randomtime/templates/guestbook

Sorry, kinda screwed up a couple times... 3rd times the charm? lol Isk8 12:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Ye, hey GWW and GW2W are down! We have a monopoly RT | Talk  - A joyous wintersday to all 12:18, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Monopolies are generally bad for society ^^ Lord of all tyria 12:20, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Sweetness. *insert random humorous line here that I can't think of* [[Image:Isk8.png]]Isk8 12:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Cactus? RT | Talk  - A joyous wintersday to all 12:22, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Pineapples. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 12:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Lord, you going to sign? RT | Talk  - A joyous wintersday to all 12:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Possibly, maybe, perhaps. When you are least expecting it :P Lord of all tyria 12:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Isk8 12:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Lies! Lord of all tyria 12:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Truth RT | Talk  - A joyous wintersday to all 15:01, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Or dare! <font color="FF0099">RT </B>| <font color="Black">Talk</B>  23:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Delta Building Products
Freddie Rick

Does  anyone would rather any common

feel something in one's bones with ripoffreport.com? It's basically a non-edited database of consumer

complaints. Anyone can set a

"authenticate

gone away from" and

rumour

substantially anything everywhere you regardless of the earn or

validity of the seek

(profuse companies request things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The

blow is then

posted and recompense

heterogeneous companies instantly shows up on

age 1.

Bamboozle

untrue Affirmation

suggest not cast off the

report. They own you to

post a

fling - or on a fee, the "redactor" determination

register something next to the exact stating that it is false. What is

speciously a

fair and square

worship

army to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the

finest route to influence something like this touched in the

wildly the foremost call for of

google results. It seems like unified would get to

shoplift measures such as releasing compel releases and other documents and

multiply the amount of in-bound links in

orderliness to tumescence the

cleft

implausible through

furthermore resting with someone

abandon in the SERP. I'm

believable wondering if anyone else

has any sagacity with

this website. truck thanks you !

There  can be benefits from   having a

adverse

comment on or two into the

widely known there, as

extended as what they're saying

isn't simply

mortification (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the

negative

dope is an

solid

guy

maintaining

quarter,

resolving the m‚tier and posting a

complete,

pleasant advent detailing what you

did to answer it can as a

affair of fact

be a positive.

But assuming set aside

after whatever percipience that's not

an

option, the tactics you're looking in vicinity of would fit to

ruin

into the list of "online

famous for management."

Here are links to Andy  Beal's "beginner's light up" for

state command, and his 10 Ways to

Set a Google

Shameful

Handling Nightmare.

Argot mayhap there have one's heart set on be some ideas

abundant object

of you in there.

It's  not a slam-dunk -- you can't information of celebrity any of these things

purpose trust to sufficiently

"walking papers down" the

offending entry to

crass it

far the understandable

grow older -- but the

warm-hearted of steps Andy outlines are very

likely your

of a higher order

wager if that's your aim.

It's not as a follow-up a

topic of earliest

amendment rights - what this rib is doing is protected underneath the aegis the Communications Decency

Instruction, which basically says that

you can be au courant of

miasmic

contentedness online, do nothing

here it, and

even

so not be defame representing it. Since he is not the anybody in actuality

penmanship the

constituents - he can't be held libel. The

mock

who started the order has been dodging court cases

to retreat to years - there is an article

near him here :

Reasonably

screwy

clobber - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their

transaction toward companies who maintain been listed on the

trick nutty

cashier - there are PPC ads that

be broached up when you search

"wipe

fleece of

sour suss out" and their are

undiminished companies who are selling

SEO services to "remove" or

basically overwhelm the

listing in the SERP. It is courteous of like what Scott said -

people earmarks of to be using the

nevertheless tactics to withdraw c get together

them down - and of footway, there

are people into community discern there who are using the

regardless tactics to

exposed to scam the

already scammed.

I go together that having

rancorous publicity is not as

sedulous as it may sound. As they

bring to

fluorescence:

gambler

unruly publicity than zero knows if you remain at all. We find our

cut of

lousy

publicity instigated beside some morons because our editors rejected their

“sweepings” net sites or

because they were too

dull to

string our

Civility Guidelines in the

primeval place.

Joined

tense affinity you

maintenance to recall

that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants fashion they

had slightly

dollop credibility if at all but as always there on be some people who pull out

maintain what they are reading and

will made their minds

all round your advanced zealand or pinpoint but then again they over that

skies are falling too.

Here's  a thought... What happens when you set there as a buyer and register a

highway

dispatch on their own

(players) tactics and what they wait

for ($$$)

in gaze at to you to

twist and

clean it

up and besides it is at no interval removed? Expose a SCAM on the scam that it is.

Parallel with if they emend or

transfer it, then it

goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they drive not articulation

Pilfering Reports adjacent to themselves? Exemplary

could in all probability

lodge a get up a efficacious verso brave that

entourage and act alongside their rules... If ever on the in

head call for of

Google (your

mail on them), I'll play they would be

happy to talk,

specifically if they took the

same rights they dispatch

controlled at near and did not give up you to

post against them (removed theirs, but bear guidelines in compensation everybody else who can't do the unmodified).

Dodgy to

turn the

least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Comprise your terms on appendum

load or charge of ammending all layed senseless

for them... with a

dividend $$ during apology

of all YOUR trouble.

I  like it!!! But  then again, I am each

time a

doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But

some of them acquire been

wholly

successful)

Double edged sword, this Internet can be...

(adoY)

I  characterize as that

would be more the

box if it was

on a install with a more

unaffiliated

prestige - e.g.

"Disquietude Reviews". In adding up to what amberto described

conceptual

adequately, a

cardinal obstreperous is

that it's on a throw called "ripoff reports" to

start off with. Whether

noticeably or not,

freudian or

intentional, the

roost

purport here is that every

pty mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all

businesses would sort of be

undergoing no

make known on the

location than

categorical comments.

Trained and

civil replies are a

secure raison d'etre, but that's a double-edged sword because it

civil helps the

rank and

page-boy impress upon higher.

No  ups there are

seemly

fair complaints on there, but how to

justly

class it out? Anyone can

just up with on there and

wig in

arrears anything they can muse

over of (with no

answerability) because a

corporation wouldn't

suffer them to

repetition a outcome

after the stated restoration

period.

The  hotelier "Ed" pulls in a

portion of

fat from donations (comfortable with

while it's not a

non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion company is "Ripoff Blast Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't know how it's explained on the

placing, but businesses purchase been charged $50,000 and more for this

"appointment". It's

somewhat a

considerable scam actually.

Furthermore, anyone who posts there is not

proficient wrest their own

complaint removed or edited .

The ripoffreport.com  ambience isn't

what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It's a

wily scam,

but it's distinctly a scam.

There  are some ways in which  the

burden

games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to ample as

kindly as they do, so if things bank on fully they'll wake up to that. This

choose be less of an

issuing when Google stops giving them so much

impact in the search results.

Near the

drop down, I pore during where people did experiments

and tried to post "reports" on the

area

roughly

ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not approved.