User talk:PanSola/~

I will ask again that you cease this administrative service on behalf of ANet on this wiki. We do not have a position of "ANet Police Officer" in this wiki and it's not something we ever decided to do. You need to separate being an admin on this wiki and doing a favor for ANet/looking out for their best interest/etc. --Karlos 07:45, 6 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Would it satisify you if the separation is done via me longer being an admin? It's not a threat, but a simple evaluation of how I can serve the GuildWars community.  Major vandalism hasn't been a big problem especially since the spammers are all kept out, so I don't think GuildWiki will notice the difference whether I continue as an admin or not.  - 07:55, 6 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Hmmm, I for one would not want you to step down, but to your question a question: How does the GW community benefit from you stepping down? Is the alpha-leak issue such a huge problem that it demands handling and as such, if you are unable to place this warning in your signature it will put the game at risk? I find your question exaggerational. I do not think the GW community will benefit from you stepping down, I do not think they are benefitting from that tag to begin with. --Karlos 08:03, 6 October 2006 (CDT)


 * The community will not benefit from the act of me stepping down itself, nor will not placing the note in my sig put the game at risk. But helping leaks plugged in a timely manner will benefit the community in the long run.  The effect of it is probably hard to notice, but on the other hand the effect of me staying as an admin vs stepping down is also hard to notice.  I don't think me stepping down hurts the community to begin with, whereas pluging leaks in a timely manner benefits the community subtlely.  Let me know if you are interested in a more indepth theory of why pluggng leaks in a timely manner will subtlely benefit the community in the long run. - 08:13, 6 October 2006 (CDT)


 * Proceed. I'd like to know how you plan to "plug" them as well. --Karlos 09:23, 6 October 2006 (CDT)


 * I'd also be interested but I do not see what you being an admin has to do with this. I think this is more an issue of you acting on your own perogative, potentially against what the wiki wants.  --Fyren 15:46, 6 October 2006 (CDT)


 * I agree with Fryen, but i didn't want to debate the point of whether me being admin has anything to do with it. Just because I am not in my admin shoes does not prevent others from seeing me and assuming I am in those shoes.  It's similar to the older issue where what I would've done as an user anyways got perceived as an action taken by an admin (though the effects/implications are of quite different nature).  Anyways, I have to apologize and inform you guys that the full explaination will have to wait until either Sunday or next Wednesday, depending on how screwed I am in real life. - 23:09, 6 October 2006 (CDT)


 * As PanSola's link is in his sig and not within an actual article, and because we have never established a policy on sig format/contents/length, I really don't see a problem with his sig. It's not for personal gain and he has made it clear whenever the subject comes up that it's not something done as part of his admin duties.  So, to me, while it does impose clutter into talk threads, I see no other harm being done.  --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:26, 6 October 2006 (CDT)