User talk:64.229.196.153

Hi
We have a policy here of Only revert once. If you disagreed with Tetra's reverts, you should explain in talk instead of simply reverting (and losing important changes in the process). &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 19:46, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * Apparantly, yours admin truly has blocked me. --64.229.196.153 19:50, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * You are playing a very dangerous game. Ban notice added. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 19:55, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * Aside from stabber's attitude, the policy Only revert once is a real one. If you believe the information was wrong, please discuss it on the talk page of the relavent article.  Do not assume other users/admins can tell which side is correct.  By discussing it on a talk page, you get your opportunity to present your case of why you are correct and the other side is wrong.  The act of simply reverting, saying the other side is wrong, but offering no furthur explanation, only encourages the other party to revert what you have reverted.  In the end we'll have 20 reverts without making any progress.  That is the reason the policy exists. -PanSola 20:05, 6 May 2006 (CDT)

More dirty laundry washing
From Rainith's talk page:
 * Yes, and the "i take your side because uve been here longer" attitude is just THAT much better, isn't it? Keep in mind the fact that you're taking the side of who is seemingly a "maintainence worker" of this Wiki, who is acting like your average street thug; making threats over nothing, and providing bogus proof to back themselves up. And yet, people listen to them because they are just the followers... --64.229.196.153 20:12, 6 May 2006 (CDT)

From Stabber's talk page:
 * Yes, welcome to GuildWIki. We are all stuck up pricks here. Have a nice day. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 19:58, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * That's taking it too literal. Plus, acting like an admin and not being one, and threatening with bans? Seriously... That's just becoming quite ignorant and pathetic.--64.229.196.153 20:00, 6 May 2006 (CDT)

In my opinion as a long time watcher and (s)light contributor to GuildWiki, I think both these users need to be given a ban. They have each failed to respect the other. I would be really sorry to see no action taken against either of them. Stabber's had it coming for a long time based on past misbehaviours (whatever his contributions may be), and anon is just a disrespectful jerk. There, I've said my piece. F G 22:56, 6 May 2006 (CDT)

Explanation for ban notice
I have explained my thoughts regarding this on User talk:Stabber.

I am forcing this issue. Discussion is perhaps best conducted on Stabber's page. F G 04:54, 7 May 2006 (CDT)