Talk:Domination Magic

Something should be done about this. This article should be changed to Domination Magic (Quest) or the other one to Domination Magic (Attribute) --Geeman 08:20, 1 Aug 2005 (EST)

Nevermind me. This has already been done. --Fyren 19:37, 1 Aug 2005 (EST)

Disambiguation page or not?
I believe this is wrong. I think Domination Magic should point to the attribute since 90% of the references and searches are for that, and then the parenthese go to the Quest. We can place a note in the Attribute page that says there is a quest with that name for those lost. --Karlos 10:39, 27 Sep 2005 (EST)
 * Wow. It's late February and I just noticed this. I agree. --130.58 09:54, 25 February 2006 (CST)
 * Blah, I ditto. -PanSola 04:39, 26 February 2006 (CST)
 * Problem with that is this article seems to be on a spambot's "attack list." I'd much rather protect a diambig. page than an attribute page, as nothing really needs to be added to this page, unless they make something else in the game and name it Domination Magic.  --Rainith 10:38, 26 February 2006 (CST)
 * I prefer having a disambiguation page here; but most of the articles that link to this page should be fixed to bypass it and go directly to the article (for example, each skill should link directly to the attribute article instead of to here). --161.88.255.140 00:42, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * I ackownledge Rainith's concern, but still agree with Karlos and 130.58. The Domination attribute article is pretty complete, with rarely any edits, so I don't see protection would be a major problem.  You can eitehr tell ppl to post their edits to the talk page, or make a editcopy. -PanSola 00:48, 28 February 2006 (CST)

Hot vandalism target
Nearly all of recent edits to this article have been reversions of vandalism and spamming. As this page seems fairly final in its design, perhaps it's time to protect it? &mdash; Stabber 23:08, 23 February 2006 (CST)
 * I wonder what makes this page such a preferred target for spammers and vandals. It looks like any other page to me. -- 23:15, 23 February 2006 (CST)
 * That would be the word "Domination," which triggers spambots because of the sexual association. --130.58 01:40, 25 February 2006 (CST)
 * Heh, pwned d-: -PanSola 01:46, 25 February 2006 (CST)
 * Protected. --Rainith 07:30, 25 February 2006 (CST)

Article name
This messes up the attribute box, can't we move this to domination magic and put a see also link 195.137.4.228 14:15, 23 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Considering that 99% of the time, you do mean the attribute, not the quest, and considering how many links to the disambiguation page I've had to change, and considering how Protection Prayers and Protection Prayers (Quest) are set up, I really think we should just make Domination Magic refer to the attribute and just have a little note at the top that points to the quest. --adeyke 18:37, 23 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Thirded. See also Talk:Domination Magic. That article needs to be unprotected by an admin first. I doubt the spambots will be returning any time soon, what with the Captcha and all. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 18:39, 23 April 2006 (CDT)


 * My bot is making this move now. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 19:19, 23 April 2006 (CDT)


 * Done! &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 19:44, 23 April 2006 (CDT)

Should Punishment Spells have a seperate list?
I like to think that I have a good grasp on Punishment builds, but I know a lot of people just don't get the idea behind it. Couple with the fact that not many people use Mesmers (IMHO) and that, when they do, it is a secondary for Echo, why don't we help clue people in with a list of Punishment Skills for all Mesmer spells? Why not go one better, and maybe put one up for all classes? --Carnival King 02:49, 6 December 2006 (CST)