User talk:Shadowphoenix/copyrighted image

Same as fair use RT | Talk  18:56, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * yeah but im providing some extra stuff that was the disclaimer to me usign the image. -- Shadowphoenix  19:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Could you please take out the categories? Both are wanted and have just one member. I am with RT in thinking you could simply add the info to the fair use license. All that would be actually required is the author, since "Notwithstanding any other statement on this page" is superfluous when the fair use license already says "This work is copyrighted and unlicensed". If it is licensed to you for your personal use, you really ought to mention that as well, maybe under "license reason". --◄mendel► 15:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, it is not fair use. Using something that is copyrighted, in a non commercial way, without the copyright holders permission is Fair Use.  Using something that you have permission to use, requires a different template.  -- Shadowphoenix  19:01, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for getting rid of the categroies.
 * Yeah, I've had a similar dilemma on Image:Valid-xhtml10-blue.png. We should have a copyright template that is patterned after the other license templates. Shouldn't be that hard to do. Is it urgent in any way? --◄mendel► 22:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree mendel, we should have another template for it (with the same style as the others of course). Maybe propose it at the community portal talk page?  -- Shadowphoenix  06:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)