Talk:Mission overviews (Eye of the North)

i think we should name the missions in EotN "Quissions" because they are not really missions...and they're not really quests so they are a composite "Quission"
 * I like "Questions" better. Quest and ions. Nilator 21:54, 1 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Yes, "Missions" in GW:EN differ from those in the three "Chapters". Each Chapter has presented differences in the way the Storyline is moved ahead. If it advances the storyline, it is a Mission. Cogito 02:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I like missions....because they are missions....--Santa&#39;sGonnaKillYou 12:20, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * I think they are Missions. They are on the map. You can do them as often as you want to. You have this end-of-mission picture at the end (the scroll). The only thing that is crazy: Your group can be wiped and resurrected. --[[Image:Warrior's_Endurance.jpg|18px]] numma_cway 13:40, 6 September 2007 (CDT)
 * According to Gaile, they're officially designated repeatable primary quests. -- Gordon Ecker 16:55, 6 September 2007 (CDT)
 * The mission ends if all party members die. The quest fails when key hero dies. In these missions or quests you can't fail due to party die, or follower dies. Crowley 02:06, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
 * There is still plenty of editing to do in all the pages listed here.
 * Many pages in this group (Missions, remember?) are tagged as "This quest-related article is a stub."
 * What is the difference between a Mission and a Quest? Those linked pages say "Quests have no impact on the overarching storyline". "A mission . . . is an expedition to perform a specific task". I have long considered that "Specific Task" to be specifically to advance the Storyline. Most players seem to have this impression also, judging by the way they use the "Player Search" function in outposts.
 * Should the "stubs" among the pages listed here be edited to put them under "Mission stubs"? That would make it easier for editors to organize the tasks they want to focus on.Cogito 02:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Where is the quest 'Heart of the shiverpeaks?' it is primary Dwarf Quest and yet it is not on here..... ,Tom,
 * You will find it, when the time has come. --[[Image:Warrior's_Endurance.jpg|18px]] numma_cway 13:40, 6 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Isn't it past time for the above two lines to be removed? They are no longer relevant, since HoS is now listed in the Article.Cogito 02:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * We don't blank others' comments. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 02:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Mission Arcs?
ive heard of three story arcs (one asura, one ebon vanguard and one norn)

are they represented in the three "swimlanes" leading downwards, or all three should be completed? &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.158.109.73 (contribs).
 * All three arcs must be completed. -- Gordon Ecker 16:55, 6 September 2007 (CDT)

The Beginning of the End
somebody should take that out. J1j2j3 11:07, 12 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Why? It's a primary quest. -- Gordon Ecker 19:20, 12 September 2007 (CDT)

Mission Map
Is anyone working on a summary map for the mission locations as per the other three campaigns? Bonsai nine 12:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Eye of Agony
With all due respect to | Gordon Ecker, who created the "swimlanes", I am sorry to say that the current mission layout is not helpful. If, because this is a "work in progress", the standard rules don't apply, my apologies. But I have some issues with the current version of this page. I guess my question is: Does the Wiki Community think we should change this pages' layout? Obviously, my vote is YES! -- Sabardeyn 13:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The three columns for the three campaigns serve no purpose; the only split in the storyline that is campaign dependent is the starting mission. Everything else occurs without relevance to the originating campaign.
 * The current layout kind of implies that only characters from a specific campaign can perform a specific story arc - which is not the case.
 * The bands of color are simply annoying. I understand their purpose and, for the story arcs they make some sense, but not for the entire table.
 * Lastly, unless this is a new format for the Mission Overviews, it does not comply with the existing format in use.
 * If you reckon you can do one that matches the usual format, then just do it ... that's the whole idea of wikis after all. Bonsai nine 07:55, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I like the layout better then the ones for the other campaigns. I would vote for an implementation of something similar there rather then a change here... :) The layout does in mind not imply that each campaign can do a certain storyline just look at where the arrows are. There is only 1 arrow going from "The Beginning of the End" for example. I can agree that the colour coding is a bit strange but it serves its purpose well I think.--Winterbay 09:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * To me, it's fine. It is rather obvious, cept for one thing, that, say the Prophecies line is : What Lies Beneath -> Beginning of the End -> Against the Destroyers -> (here comes the odd part) ONE of three -> rest. That is the only problem I see. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]] -- (s)talkpage 09:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)