User talk:Warwulf16362

User:71.219.57.125
Wow... great minds think alike. First, I revert than the vandalism on the Master of Survival. I revert the vandalism same time as you do (I got an edit conflict) and then as I post a warning on his user talk, you put the bad on his user page. Nice teamwork. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 03:06, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Heh, a wiki tag-team duo, it seems. I'm glad I'm not the only one who caught it. Good eye. ^_^ --Warwulf 03:09, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Well... it is hard to miss. The vandalism is both obvious and downright odd.  Seems the anon just went through adding random syntax tags like bold and stuff.  Almost like he/she sat there and just pushed all of the various editing tools.  Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 03:13, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * What's odd is that he seemingly made a worthwhile contribution before his vandalism spree too. --Warwulf 03:17, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Yeah, one good edit... we assume he is acting in the interests of the wiki, seems to know what the editing tools do (or at least isn't using them erratically) and then the next three edits are vandalism. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense.  Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 03:18, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Meh, I've long since given up on trying to understand people. <.< --Warwulf 03:28, 23 March 2007 (CDT)

Talk:Ritualist Ancient Armor
A word to the wise: I couldn't quite tell what was going on there, the history was kind of confusing as to who reverted what when, that and I didn't look at it for very long, just be careful not to revert reverts because then those become revert wars, and reverting reverts will get both parties (even if one is doing the "right" thing) in trouble for violating GW:1RV. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 03:37, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * I was debating what to do about it, actually. But it seems that the original revert was to restore a removed comment that didn't belong to that user. It's hard getting out of the 3RV wikipedia swing. I'll try and be a bit more careful in the future. --Warwulf 03:41, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Yeah, it's hard to know what to do, especially when you know/think you are "in the right." I think it is especially frustrating at 3:51 AM when none of the Admins are on ;) and the original violator is an Anon who is unlikely to respond to any kind of warning.  The best option is to contact an Admin, but that is one of the easier ones to break when you are well intentioned.  I have been warned once or twice about it myself.  If possible I would say just don't get involved though since you become equally guilty for violating GW:1RV.  Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 03:45, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * It appears that Fyren is on, so you could always just tell him. Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 03:45, 23 March 2007 (CDT)

Doing administrative stuff at 4 AM is fun, isn't it ;) Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 04:00, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * I don't know why I'm still here. I planned on going to bed an hour and half ago. There's just some sort of weird rush you get from putting a deletion tag on a broken redirect that sleep just compete with. --Warwulf 04:07, 23 March 2007 (CDT)

I am still trying to figure out what is going on here. The author, who is currently editing the build under an Anon IP because his account was temporarily blocked is doing weird things with the formatting of the page. He also removed a delete tag when those tags specifically say that author's aren't supposed to do so. Gem already knows he is editing the build under an Anon IP, but the other stuff is confusing me a bit. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 04:11, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Kind of ridiculous. The builds are all getting wiped shortly and people are still violating policy to try to help their builds... Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 04:12, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Sometimes I wonder why we bother worrying about the builds knowing their fate. Anyways, I slapped an admin review tag on the article and left it for someone else to worry about. See how long that tag stays there. --Warwulf 04:19, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * So, you added the administrative review tag while I warned the "Anon." The tag team domination continues.  As to the build section, I used to check/review every untested build pretty much every day.  Now I don't even look at the page.  It's all a moot point considering they are all gonna get deleted.  It's a wonder people even post no builds except for the fact that most newer users probably don't know about the build wipe.  What I really don't get is experienced users who are still trying to vote on and discuss builds knowing full well they will all be deleted.  Well, it is Administrative stuff and policy for me right now until the new build section is ready to be worked on.  Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 04:22, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Well, the Anon put the deletion tag back on, although he did remove the admin review tag which I guess becomes moot if he puts the deletion tag back on. Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 04:24, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * If you're referring to me, i'm bored :P &mdash; Skuld 04:25, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * You among others. Couldn't you be doing something productive at least.  I mean, it is 4:35 AM and I am also bored, but at least I have reverted some stuff and warned some users etc.  You could be doing just about anything, why work on the build section?  (edit) I did see you revert one thing.  Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 04:27, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Its 8:39 AM and I have 20 mins to kill ;D &mdash; Skuld 04:31, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Ah. Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 04:33, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Maybe I should go to bed.... I have to be up soon :). Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 04:33, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Well, nothing is goin' on right now and it is 4:45 AM. G'night all.  Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 04:39, 23 March 2007 (CDT)