Talk:Condition

Same problem here. When you click on Condition or Conditions the redirect leaves out the sub-categories for some reason. --Karlos 14:34, 2 Aug 2005 (EST)

Does anyone know why when I search for "Conditions" I am redirected to the Category page but WITHOUT the subcategories below? --Karlos 14:31, 2 Aug 2005 (EST)
 * I checked the MediaWiki bug tracker, it's a known issue. --Fyren 15:54, 2 Aug 2005 (EST)

Conditions as a Category
Woah. Woah, woah, woah. I'm not sure I like the new direction here, and I'd like to see it put up for general debate. Conditions was a big article. It had a lot of information. But it was not too big. Each condition is not worthy of an idividual article. They're small status effects, similar to hexes. Unlike hexes, however, they do not have much extra information to go with them like cost and location to acquire. They're common and easy to find as part of a large variety of skills. Their description should be a handy reference sheet, without a bunch of traveling from page to page to get the full story. A category is just plain unnessecary, even if they were to double the number of conditions in the next update they're still best kept as one page. --Talrath Stormcrush 17:49, 2 Aug 2005 (EST)


 * Sure thing, let's talk about it. Here's where I stand:
 * The conditions page was HUGE. By the standards of all those other articles everyone was marking as "too long" that article was "way too long."
 * It was quite frankly annoying to have to type  Conditions#  before the name of every condition. Completely unnecessary.
 * It was obscure. A new contributer to the Wiki seeking to add a remark about how a condition affects something would think the condition does not exist because a search for "knock down" and "knockdown" and "knocked down" would yield no articles with those titles. He/she might even assume we don't have an article about the condition.
 * The information in each condition is a healthy dose for an article.
 * If you are reading about Poison and are interested in other "Conditions" click on the conditions link at the bottom of the page. You'll find all the others.
 * On the other hand, if a person clicks on "Weakness" and they are sent to a page with 10 others headings and the one they want is not even in the top of the page, they may become disoriented.
 * I will actually use your "hex" example against you. Conditions are far more common than hexes. They are caused each by more than one skill and each can be removed by more than one skill. Each condition has more info to it than a hex... Yet we have all those hex pages (and rightfully so).
 * To wrap up, it's a clear case for a category. I always thought it was this way simply out of laziness (i.e. first contributor put them in an article and as people added to it, it grew) and people just adjusted. I never thought it was by design. If it is, I would like to know that desgin. --Karlos 18:16, 2 Aug 2005 (EST)

Half agree, half disagree. Firstly, categories are not articles. A page called Condition needs to exist with the summary information that's currently included on Category:Conditions, and (of course) a link to the category. Categories are a tool, but they do not replace well-written articles. Secondly, anticipated article length is not a requirement for article status. A paragraph-long article that fully explains a single idea or term is a good article, whereas a pages-long article that explains a lot of loosly related things is not. This is GuildWiki style by convention, and should be added to an appropriate Style and formatting page if it is not already there. Each condition should have its own article, and the category is good, but an article about conditions in general needs to exist as well. &mdash;Tanaric 20:08, 2 Aug 2005 (EST)


 * I hadn't read this, but you sum up my feelings well here Tanaric, I just replied at Category_talk:Conditions. I'm going to start writing something here to explain what conditions are. 04:01, 4 Aug 2005 (EST)

Condition as a Singular
I think the primary entry should be Conditon and not Conditions. just like Hex and Spell and Hydra. --Karlos 17:23, 4 Aug 2005 (EST)


 * I agree Karlos, I was just about to post this myself :) I'll move it now. 01:40, 9 Aug 2005 (EST)

Right-Aligned TOC
That's fantastic, and I'm definitely going to steal it. Nice work, Karlos. --Squeg 05:55, 19 October 2005 (EST)

Frag missing
I noticed that Fragility wasn't listed in the "Skills that involve conditions in other ways" section so I added it. I also added a short synopsis of the skills that are listed in that section. Hope this is ok.
 * I have a question - is it ok to use slang like "regen" in the descriptions? I wrote the one for Resilient Weapon to match the other ones and was thinking it might be confusing to a new player. --MasterPatricko 15:34, 3 October 2006 (CDT)

Antidote Signet
I added Antidote Signet to the list of condition removing skills. However, I did not add it to the template of condition removing skills, due to the seeming consensus on that template's discussion page that it should be reserved for remove-all skills. Arshay Duskbrow 20:53, 27 July 2006 (CDT)

Condition aquiring
Is there a list (otherwise maybe one should be made) of skills (or possibly other sources too, but the list would probably get too big) which can self inflict conditions? I know if you go to any ONE condition page, it can tell you the skills that can put it on yourself, but what about ALL conditions together?--142.161.30.68 19:52, 30 January 2007 (CST)
 * This one includes which skills can transfer conditions to yourself: Transfer condition skills quick reference (see target column). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:59, 30 January 2007 (CST)
 * Nevermind - I misunderstood what you wanted, and that one won't do it. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:01, 30 January 2007 (CST)

Signet of Malice
Shouldn't Signet of Malice  be noted here, as it reacts to a condition? --Rickyvantof 11:36, 14 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Yes it should, feel free to change it yourself, i have already done this change for you. -- Xeon 11:57, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

Cracked Armor
Did some data mining on the www today and came across what cracked armor does, for now i know it is correct. If they change this before its release dont blame me :P
 * Cracked Armor. While suffering from this Condition, you have -20 armor (minimum 60).

Its bad enough there is blind and cripple, now melee damagers have to deal with less armor, gg anet, spread the melee hate. -- Xeon 08:50, 20 May 2007 (CDT)
 * It would be nice if they added some more skills that caused dazed so we warriors can keep up. I am bobo 12:13, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

Condition Reduction
How does condition reduction stack? If I have a -20% cripple shield & a Rune of Restoration, am I at -40%? -36%? Do condition reduction runes stack? Craw   13:29, 28 May 2007 (CDT)
 * Runes don't stack, but they did at first. But people were using a pile of clarity runes on warriors in PvP.  After some testing, it appears that a 15s cripple reduced by a rune and an upgrade results in a 10s cripple, so it looks like 36%.  --Fyren 15:32, 29 May 2007 (CDT)
 * Thank you kindly, Fyren. I was testing it myself, and couldn't really time the difference. Craw   15:45, 29 May 2007 (CDT)
 * I used stances that lasted 9s and 10s along with illusion of haste. I timed it so the effect for the cripple and stance popped up in the effects monitor at the same time.  --Fyren 16:00, 29 May 2007 (CDT)

Standard
In skill progression tables, what's the standard way to label durations for conditions. For Deep Wound currently there are skills with progression tables with "Deep Wound Duration", "Deep Wound", "Duration", "DW Duration", some with links to deep wound and some without. M s4 11:10, 22 June 2007 (CDT)

self inflict
it doesn't look like there is any reference that shows these, so i felt free to create one under the name "Self condition inflict skills quick reference". I think this is quite useful. You'll find the skills you are searching for faster if you want to build something with condition-transfering skills or skills that require a condition. —  Zerpha The Improver  16:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

66% less damage dealt in combat
Isn't it physical damage? (weakness) Lost-Blue 01:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC)