User talk:Skinny Boy/Archive 1

Illyana's Staff
As far as I know, there is only one version of Illyana's Staff, which is "10/10 all" compared to your edit of "20/20 all" at Mesmer unique items quick reference. Can you post a screenshot of the Illyana's Staff with the new stats? -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 22:52, 2 July 2006 (CDT)


 * BTW, if it doesn't enhances Domination Magic spells specifically, it belongs in the All attributes section, not Domination Magic section. -User:PanSola (talk to the [[Image:follower of Lyssa.png]]) 23:27, 2 July 2006 (CDT)


 * If you take time to read the rest of the article, you will notice the weapons are sectioned by what attributes they enhance, not by what attributes they require. -User:PanSola (talk to the [[Image:follower of Lyssa.png]]) 23:32, 2 July 2006 (CDT)

Couple of things

 * 1) If people leave you messages on your talk page, go ahead and respond here, it keeps the conversation together and easier to follow.
 * 2) Try to keep conversations civil, posting things like "Die You!!!" to people, is not exactly civil. If you're joking use smilies as w/o them things can be easily misinterpreted.
 * 3) If you really want to know how PanSola can stop you, he can protect the article so that you can't edit it. He probably won't do that as he's a nice guy, but I wouldn't push him.  :)  --Rainith 23:40, 2 July 2006 (CDT)

Illyana's Staff, continued
If you are wondering how I can stop you, I can quote the GW:1RV policy and get you banned for repeating to add information after being informed that it does not belong. I can protect the article so that NOBODY can edit it for a period of time in case you log out or register a new user name to evade the ban and try to edit again. "But I want to put it there" is not sufficient nor justified reason to put things. The best outcome, of course, is if you can remove that row yourself. I'm not interested in banning ppl or protecting pages if I don't have to, and I've added explanatory notes so now other contributes if they care enough when they see that entry will realize it is wrong and removed it. I'll check on it tomorrow and remove it myself if it is still there. (Blah, edit conflict with Rainith). -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 23:48, 2 July 2006 (CDT)

Warlord article
Hello. I had marked the Warlord article for deletion as it has no in-game relevance. GuildWiki is not an encyclopedia and has a practice of not documenting terms that are not part of the game.

If the article is related solely to your characters, I would recommend moving it to User:Skinny Boy/Warlord, as information exclusive to a user's account really belongs in the user-space. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:42, 3 July 2006 (CDT)