User talk:Jupsto

User talk:Jupsto/Archive 1

Since you say ur a beta assassin then me, how bout u take a look at my talk page, down the bottom and tell me what you think about my stab build? -- "Wings" 10:35, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

Yes?
I'd have to agree with you. -- Nova   --  (contribs) 12:29, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Cheers 16:16, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Heyy, Jups, I think you might want this :)

-- Nova   --  (contribs) 09:27, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

Fair dos 10:33, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

Vetting issues
Hmm, even though you chop your own builds, and admit they're useless you still go about striking out votes and calling people noobs who disagree? -- Barrage. 18:56, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

Striking votes = lies. Happned once and it was with the rules. Jupsto 11:21, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

Re: Your builds
If you want them deleted, just place a delete tag on them with the reason, Deletion per author request, or something like that. No reason for a petition. &mdash; Gares 11:40, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

Last time some perk took my tags off and said not decent reason. i'll try it anyways thanks. 11:42, 13 March 2007 (CDT)


 * If you would have put a reason like the one above, that build would have been deleted. I said it was an immature reason and it was. I like the use of p instead of j. In the future, I would refrain from such behavior. Thanks. &mdash; Gares 11:55, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

You lost me with the p and j part and refraim from which behavoir - imature reasons? 11:57, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

oh and i used the reason yuo gave me this time 11:57, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

Your sig
The sig policy states that your user name must be clear from your sig. My icon makes clear that I'm Gem, but your sig icon doesn't relate to 'Jupsto', so you need to hav eyour name in your sig too. -- (talk) 11:58, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

yeah my first one was called jupsto icon, but it took me a few versions and this version got called that for some reason. i try and fix it 12:00, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

I cant move it, if you can change it to being called jupsto or jupsto icon i would be greatfull 12:01, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

Changed it to this for now Jupsto 12:27, 13 March 2007 (CDT)


 * I don't think you understand. The image itself needs to look like or somehow represent your user name, not just the image name. E.g. Gem's sig picture is actually a Gem. (Although some peopel think it looks like a pink shield ^.^) -- Nova  [[Image:NovaSmall.PNG]] --  (contribs) 20:19, 13 March 2007 (CDT)


 * Yeah but i look like the face and i'm sure gem doesn't look like a gem xD. anyways jupsto isn't a real word so.. what you ask is impossible. Jupsto [[image:Feck_Off.jpg|19px]] 12:22, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Hey I didn't ask that! ^.^ Gem did! Oh well, maybe do something like what Entropy did, hers is a pic of the word ^.^ Oh well, yours is fine as it is :) -- Nova  [[Image:NovaSmall.PNG]] --  (contribs) 13:57, 16 March 2007 (CDT)

User Page
Content in your user page violates GW:NPA. Unfavoured: 90% Noobcraft, 10% original and mint ideas rejected by fools. Change this word please. &mdash; Gares 15:07, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

Changed it to idiocy, Ie. senseless/foolish behaivour. this means its a comment on behaivour and not personal, so it does not violate the code. Jupsto 19:33, 19 March 2007 (CDT)


 * Rejected by idiocy is still commenting on the users involved in voting. You are commenting on users' behavior which is still personal. Comment on the system, the builds, but nothing pertaining to the users. Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done. My advice, remove the sentence or reword to exclude the mention of voters. &mdash; Gares 19:45, 19 March 2007 (CDT)


 * anyhow, it should be ok now.