User talk:Ninjatek11526

Hi, I wanne react on the things you wroth.. You almost never use Rebirth... the only time i use it is when the whole party is dead... then i run away and have all the time to use it... And wath if you out of Adrenaline? then you cannot heal yourself... because you need it for Lions comfort... And have you tried the build? Because all the problem that you are talking about, i never have a problem with it....

I can chanche some things... but i need to higher Tactics... Please send me back, because i stand open for new idee's, but there are also plus points on this builds i hope....

I have chanced some things... is it better now? But now it is almost a full warrior build, and no monk.... Please chance you comment if it is so.... Thanks,

Link on userpage
FYI: The link from your user page to add comments onto your talk page was broken (it created a page titled User talk:Ninjatek&action=edit, instead of posting to your actual talk page). I fixed the link on your user page, I hope you don't mind. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 11:54, 29 December 2006 (CST)
 * Oh - the reason I found this is that an anon posted the following on that invalid page:
 * I have aquierd a branch of Juni Berries where can i sell or what are they good for please respond to bigheart314@hoymail.com it would be very appretiated &sorry about my spelling sencerly ray (Elnora Dragon) GUILDWARS  NIGHTFLLS{ELITE PLAYER } {AVATAR TWICE OVER} &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.174.101.110 (talk &bull; contribs) 11:46, December 29, 2006 (CST).
 * Thank you for fixing that. I'm still learning. --Ninjatek 12:12, 31 December 2006 (CST)

pro vs noob
I wouldn't call yourself a noob so quickly, as your statement really means that you are the typical or middle type player. Why this stick out to me? Check out what noob means on wikipedia. Long story short, "unrecognized middle ground between "newbie" and "pro."" --8765 23:53, 8 January 2007 (CST)


 * I'm trying to follow what you're saying. Are you trying to alert me to the differences between "noob," "newb," "newbie," etc?--Ninjatek 06:30, 9 January 2007 (CST)


 * Yeah basically. It's likely that one would not identify themselves as a noob, but rather as a newbie. It's easy to play spot the noob, except for when you yourself happen to be the noob. Anyways, enjoy your road to uber pro-ness. :) --8765 13:49, 9 January 2007 (CST)


 * Hah! You know, I was aware that there are different variations of the "noob" term.  I didn't know that they each evolved to mean something else.  Thanks for the heads up.--Ninjatek 15:35, 9 January 2007 (CST)

I love you!
YES! Bug 14:22, 9 January 2007 (CST)

I invite you to a discussion about the future play of guild wars: Setup for a Campaign?. Van Wark 14:50, 9 March 2007 (CST)

juni berrys
do u buy juniberrys for 5k?
 * Sign your comments please. No, I don't buy them.  I only made a note indicating that someone ELSE was buying them.--Ninjatek 13:44, 21 April 2007 (CDT)

Regarding your reverts of Energy Surge and Quick Shot by User talk:124.191.73.31
I forgot to log in, that is my one of I.p's. First let me say, if suggesting using a skill with a large cost and recharge with mind wrack (which requires the hexed oppentents energy to reach 0 to triger the damage) isn't wise. Skills such as Famine and AV/SV are far better at triggering mind wrack. Mind Wracks damage is quite low, and the chance of removing someones energy from 7 to 0 is very unlikely besides to a Warrior, unless for some reason a energy denial esmer wants to attempt to kill a Warrior. Regarding the zealous bow note, suggesting conditional stances to combine a zealos bow is all about preference. A party might be designed to have a large energy pool, where a sundering/vamp bow may be prefered. But an average player still might prefer the extra damage from a vamp bow rather than a zealous, which isn't entirely great energy for a ranger anyway. These are preferences things, and suggesting Ias's like Frenzy (for a ranger) is just plain stupid. Anyway, you wanted me to justifty my deletion of the information, and I have. Solus  03:03, 13 June 2007 (CDT)
 * Thanks for taking the time to respond in this manner. Now that I see the explanations, I agree with some of what you say.  However, we all could have saved time if you had initially left similar notes on the articles' talk pages indicating why you're removing them.  Once again, what's "obvious" to you may not be obvious to me - and that's why we make notes and explain our actions here on the Wiki.  So please, leave notes and explanations the next time you delete article content - especially if you're making bulk changes.--Ninjatek 07:37, 13 June 2007 (CDT)


 * Got my support &mdash; Skuld 03:07, 13 June 2007 (CDT)