GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Warwick (6)

=== Warwick (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count &bull; RFA page) ===

God, I have had way too damn many nominations. Lots of people probably thought I'd given up on the whole rfa front, but the ironic thing is its a tiny little thing that made me think about rfaing again - The fact I couldn't edit Entropy's page to vote in her poll. :P. The rationale of my nomination is this: I'm better than I was before, and I don't do much trolling anymore. I think I'm quite a lot more mature, wiki-wise than I was before. I doubt I'd abuse admin powers, because it'd be a fairly stupid thing to do. Surefire way to get kicked out of them, much? I also feel that I know what's involved in adminship. Sure, I seem to be relatively inactive, but I'm nearly always in IRC idling, on my gwiki msn, ingame, and I refresh RC every time I check, and I'm almost always there for a chat on my talkpage. If there's any vandalism going on, I revert it. I don't normally tag things for deletion/banning anymore, because I know that Viper will get round to it regardless. Adminship would probably increase my activity by quite a lot. I've pissed a lot of people off, and several people probably don't think that I deserve a chance, but I think I do. Plus, now if I'm a terrible admin, Entropy/Auron/Jedi can just demote me outright, without waiting for Wikia to respond. That's pretty much all I have to say. &mdash; Warw/Wick 15:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

''Please discuss the candidate's qualifications below. Elaboration on a post, counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the |talkpage.''

Supporting arguments

 * (list supporting arguments here)

Opposing arguments

 * (list opposing arguments here)

Neutral/Double-edged arguments

 * (list neutral arguments here)