Talk:Game updates/20061120

Passive XP acquisition
I just tested it, and whether you ARE attacking, using skills or just standing around is not at all relevant. However, the radius which you must be in to receive XP is now very tight. I did not test it thoroughly (as I was just trying to verify the note), but it seems you have to be within Aggro circles of the bad guys for you to get XP. Stepping in late or staying a safe distance meant no XP. But, going in as the fight was starting and reamiing in cating range of the closer bad guys got me XP for everyone that was killed (Those in casting range and those who were not). --Karlos 23:55, 20 November 2006 (CST)

Koala, I just tested it, several times, and do not appreciate you just removing that note. Please post your results. Here are mine:

This caused no XP gain:



This had XP gain:



In both cases I stood around doing absolutely nothing, however, in the second, I was just outside aggro range (and some of the melee attackers wandered into my aggro circle, but did not attack me and I took no damage and was not a target of spells). If you have different findings as to how far exactly you have to be, please post them here. --Karlos 00:55, 21 November 2006 (CST
 * Karlos, your first screenshot proves nothing since the XP marker doesn't float for long. If the issue is reproducible for you, could you provide a video instead? Caths 02:12, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * There seems to be disagreement about the new gaining XP system, I have done some testing Outside the Courthouse in GW Prophecies using a Longbow and Heros. I moved the Heros into battle before me, and Staying outside agro (Always 1.25 - 1.5 Agro Size away) I gained XP from the foes that where killed by me, and by those I did not touch.


 * http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i97/KoalaMeatPie/gw277.jpg
 * http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i97/KoalaMeatPie/gw278.jpp Koala MeatPie 01:45, 21 November 2006 (CST)
 * Second image you posted comes up not found, so I can't tell what you're trying to prove. The first one though shows you attacking, if you do that you should get XP (hence the "+0 XP" in the pic) even if you are out of the aggro bubble.  --Rainith 01:54, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * Just tested at flatbow range from uphill in Grenth's footprint (high cliffs), ie. about 1.5 aggro size away, and I gained XP. Sending in the henchies 2 aggro away also gained me XP, not until they became grayed out did I stop to received XP. So if there is an issue about no XP being gained, it's not about aggro range or aggressivity only AFAICT. Caths 02:04, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * Your finding goes 180 degrees opposite to what me and Rainith have been finding. Can you please post screenshots? --Karlos 02:18, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i97/KoalaMeatPie/gw278.jpg My bad, For some reason I accidently copied it as .jpp instead of .jpg, Allright I will go passive. And the +0xp in the first screenshot is form a foe I did not touch. Koala MeatPie 02:17, 21 November 2006 (CST)
 * After some More testing i found that to receive XP you must fufill Certain Conditions: Either you are attacking, (From outside or Inside the Agro bubble it does not matter) Or you are within the Agro bubble (Attacking or not). After either two of the conditions have been met, you can be anywhere within radar range and still receive XP.Koala MeatPie 02:31, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * No one was ever disputing or testing the case when you are attacking/using skills on enemies/party members. We are talking about passive characters. --Karlos 02:41, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * Note that I am barehand with only Passive Skills and that there is no way I could have hit them
 * http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i97/KoalaMeatPie/gw287.jpg
 * http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i97/KoalaMeatPie/gw289.jpg
 * http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i97/KoalaMeatPie/gw291.jpg Koala MeatPie 02:43, 21 November 2006 (CST)
 * Or What how about this? Can not be more Passive then that. Note that the Foes can not get any closer then they are Shown here.
 * http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i97/KoalaMeatPie/gw297.jpg Koala MeatPie 03:08, 21 November 2006 (CST)

What do those pictures prove exactly? In the first set, the monsters are iside your aggro bubble then it's clear that you were in aggro then ran away, in the second set they are just on the edge. Which is what we are saying is fine. Can you please try and focus on the issue? Issue is: if the foes are say 1.5 aggro circle away from you and you do nothing at all, you get no XP, do you agree with this? --Karlos 03:42, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Re: "Note that I am barehand with only Passive Skills". Actually in the first three screenshots (as a ranger) you have an active and attacking pet who kills things for you. Sorry, these screenshots are not conclusive. -- Alya


 * I used to do a bit of duo farming with my other half. I'd bond and he'd run off and warrior.  This lack of XP gain over a certain distance is nothing new as far as I know.   Most of the time I was just out of agro range, frequently doing not a lot, but still getting the XP.  There would be times that I trailed and wouldn't get the XP for the kills because I wasn't in range, possibly about .5 to 1 aggro circles away, similar to the distance on the first screenie from Karlos.  How is what you are seeing any different from this situation?  Are you suggesting that XP gain is more restrictive or sensitive than it was previously - is it possible that it has always been like this and it hasn't been especially noted until now?  I guess I'll do my own checks and see if I can contribute any more information. --Aspectacle 04:12, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * That maybe the case, and it is the harder case to prove (i.e. how can you prove you used to get/not get XP in a certain way after the game has been changed). I do recall sending my henchies to kill off some Djinn while I was chatting with a friend and getting XP standing right around where the first screen shot took place. However, I have no screenshot of that and no way to reproduce it. --Karlos 04:18, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * I tested this, and I had mixed results so far. While farming with wurms, I got XP and drops while being out of aggro circle but in radar range, doing nothing. After I left the wurm I tried the same the normal way and got neither drops nor XP. Something definitely changed, before this update I got XP and drops as long as I was in radar range. Now it is rather odd, most of the time I get no drops and XP, but sometimes I still get them. My Ranger got drops for killing with a Longbow - just out of aggro range. But my Ritualist, who killed a whole bunch of mobs with spirits, I moved back behind them, just out of aggro range, got nothing. - Further testing is required, but one thing is for sure: Something changed, and it does not look like an improvement to me. It is not good when they harm normal players when the likely objective is AFK idlers, powerlevellers/leechers of all kind. --Long 04:24, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * Interesting. One note.. Let's keep drops out of this. I feel drops have not changed, I still get drops from the groups killed even if I was 2 aggro circles away. Feel free to make a different thread for drops, however, I think they have not changed. --Karlos 04:27, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * I agree drops should be kept out of this. I'm willing to help out with any further testing that needs to be carried out; as an occasional bonder I have a vested interest ;)  &lt;LordBiro&gt;/&lt;Talk&gt; 06:47, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Ebon Dust Aura
Searching for it as I expect this is the update that added it. If anyone knows where it is, please advise. I have searched the Mirror of Lyss and foudn nothing (searched there cause it was the only area with only 3 caps). --Karlos 01:45, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Not in Vehjin Mines. --Karlos 02:28, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Not in the garden of Seborhin. --Karlos 03:42, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Not in the Holdings of Chokhin. --Karlos 06:02, 21 November 2006 (CST)

"has left the guild"
This seems to have made a comeback &mdash; Skuld 03:02, 21 November 2006 (CST)
 * It was back before this update must have been something silent or no one picked up on it. --Jamie [[Image:Jamie.jpg|24px|(Talk Page)]] 03:04, 21 November 2006 (CST)