Talk:Deldrimor armor

Cleanup
(If someone could clean this up and format it properly after I list it here, it would be much appreciated) (Also, I am a ranger, so the equipment may differ)


 * Aquired from Gobrech Stonefoot
 * Central Transfer Chamber.
 * Requires 26,000 Dwarven reputation points to be able to craft.



! Armour Piece || Required Materials || Cost :
 * - align="center" valign="top"
 * - align="center"
 * Bandana' || 50 Cloth ||10
 * - align="center"
 * Leather Long Coat || 150 Tanned Hide Squares / 15 Leather Squares || 10
 * - align="center"
 * Chaos Gloves || 250 Pile of Glittering Dust / 75 Ectoplasm || 10
 * - align="center"
 * Dragon Gauntlets || 250 Scales / 50 Deldrimor Steel Ingot / 4 Monstrous Fangs / 4 Monstrous Eyes || 10
 * - align="center"
 * Stone Gauntlets || 250 Granite / 10 Charcoal || 10
 * -align="center"
 * Sterling Leggings || 100 Tanned Hide Squares / 10 Damask || 10
 * -align="center"
 * Embroidered boots || 50 Tanned Hide Squares / 5 Leather Squares || 10
 * -align="center"
 * }

((I fixed the information for you and organized it a bit too.))--King Of Yuri

Original information by 76.175.146.10 18:37, 31 *August 2007 (CDT)

any pics of the new gear yet?68.142.37.218 19:43, 31 August 2007 (CDT)
 * Who's the tard who posted the tiny picture of Ele Dwarven armor?Cyruis 01:32, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

Is the bandana default for some of the armor?...cause thats stupid.Streetp 11:39, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Negative. Also, the warrior has two dwarven armor sets, not just silver eagle.--Dice 15:33, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

Lawl at the warrior and ranger dwarven armor xD 70.180.207.12 15:46, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

Reskins?
Are all GW:EN armours just poorly done reskins of the older armour? Ebon Vangaurd Male Warrior is a sad joke. It looks like someone has just done a horrible mod of the game. If I wanted to retexture my appearance I would have done so myself. Sad Dissapointment this is. 58.110.140.124 06:57, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

Agrred (MiloE3 07:54, 4 September 2007 (CDT))

Most armors in Guild Wars are reskins of another armor. Suck it up and quit bitching. It's the same for Factions, Nightfall, and Prophecies. And not all the EotN armors are reskins, you'd have to be pretty ignorant to think that. Silver Eagle, Ranger Norn, and Dervish Norn(Among some others) are completely unique.--Darksyde Never Again 23:58, 22 September 2007 (CDT)

Multiple armor sets
I don't think we can have a simple "Dwarven armor" section. As a warrior I'm getting shown the Silver Eagle Set, but also Bandana, Chaos Gloves, Heavy Breastplate, Dragon Gauntlets, Stone Gauntlets, Ironfist Gauntlets, Stalwart Leggings and Sturdy Boots. I don't know they make a second set, or if they're shared with other professions (except for Bandana and Chaos Gloves, which are). Sadie2k 17:42, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
 * I get Dragon Gauntlets and Stone Gauntlets on a Ranger as well. [[Image:Melandru's Shot.jpg|19px]]Enigma 02:11, 5 September 2007 (CDT)


 * seems there are armor sets and common armor pieces here.
 * Common Pieces: Bandana, Chaos Gauntlets, Dragon Gauntlets, Stone Gauntlets
 * The rest is based on profession. (As an assassin i got the above, plus Spiked Guise, Bladed Gloves, Oni Leggings, and Winged Shoes. Which are the only things different from the listing above)--User:Midnight08 02:58, 5 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Also, the "set" doesnt really seem to be a "set" at all, as all the names are different and it doesn't really match itself at all. --User:Midnight08 03:01, 5 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Right, except for the Warrior Silver Eagle armor, none of this "Dwarven armor" is actually a set. I suggest this article be redesigned to show individual armor pieces for each class instead of a "set" for each class.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 21:18, 5 September 2007 (CDT)

Is there any way people can repost Dwarven armor without displaying the common armor pieces? Just show the full set of the armor - showing common pieces as well gets confusing for people who haven't reached the title track to view it for themselves. --User:LikaiKailla 12:28, 5 September 2007 (EST)

Proposed restructuring of article
As per comments above regarding the non-"set"-like functionality of the Dwarven/Deldrimor armor, I have created the article User:Dr ishmael/Dwarven armor as a proposed replacement for the current article. &mdash;Dr Ishmael 22:22, 5 September 2007 (CDT)
 * I agree this is a much better way for displaying the armor since there are so many individual pieces. User:LikaiKailla
 * I agree too its more organized and helps. --[[Image:Hellbringer siggy.jpg]]  HeLlbRiNgEr  [[Image:Hellbringer siggy.jpg]] (talk|contribs) 14:35, 6 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Can we put up this page instead of the one that's currently live so people can start populating it with pictures and crafting requiremtnts/pricing? User:LikaiKailla
 * I was waiting to see if anyone else had any comments about it, but I guess it's been long enough. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 11:13, 8 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Sorry, shouldn't a complete set be the first picture, rather than each part separate? Just miss the helm and gloves out in it? --Nela 02:22, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
 * No, because this armor doesn't make a complete set. (With the exception of Warrior Silver Eagle.) First reason, the pieces for a given class don't have a common name - other sets do, like
 * Elite Flameforged Robes
 * Elite Flameforged Leggings
 * Elite Flameforged Gloves
 * Elite Flameforged Shoes
 * The Elementalist pieces here are simply:
 * Thaumaturgic Robes
 * Yeoryios Gloves
 * Exquisite Leggings
 * Majestic Shoes
 * No mention of any set name anywhere in there. Second reason, they even look mismatched for a lot of classes.  If you think that this is a full armor set with a coherent design among all the pieces, then you're just a little loony.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 11:39, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Good point. That armor is a bit..all over the place =/--74.114.224.156 17:20, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Thank you, thank you, thank you! This covers everything much better than all the Silver Eagle/Dwarven splitting. Now this just needs to be filled, heh.--Cyruis 18:16, 9 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Fair do's, though the monk female looks to share a common theme at least between the chest and legs, same flame motif... guess the next bit is, what do these items go with, assassin chest with imperial briefs *boggles* might need some fancy gallery of suggested armor combinations as to what goes with what --Nela 16:36, 11 September 2007 (CDT)

the way u guys set this up is lame it was fine before, i mean who cares if they have different names (each peice) they r still a dwarven armor right? and someone needs to fillin the pics, then maybe itll look better Lithos Soldier 17:14, 10 September 2007 (CDT)
 * *sigh* How many times do I have to explain this? The armor pieces do not say "Dwarven" anywhere in the name, thus "Dwarven Armor" technically doesn't exist!.  They are not' a set, they do not match, therefore there is no reason at all to show them as a set.
 * A couple of days ago in Gunnar's Hold, Gaile Gray said that the Dwarven armor is not a set. She said this because some people asked why you cannot display the dwarven armor in the Hall of Monuments &mdash; Ankh Mhutin 19:34, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry for all the big text there. That's the last time I say anything about this, I promise.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 18:06, 10 September 2007 (CDT)

I'd rather see a whole "set" in place so I know what the pieces look like together. Even if there is no actualy "Dwarven armor" in the game, do people think of it like that? Are people going to look for it under that name? Won't redirects from the individual pieces bringing them here be useful? As of now, I can't really tell what any of the armor sets look like cause I can only see once piece at a time. I'd rather treat this like regular armor and have redirects from the pieces. &mdash; ♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 12:08, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Agree, its such an ugly setup, id much rather see a pic with all the peices on even if the names "dont match", if things dont go together I wont buy them all but will mix and match how I feel. How are people going to realise how the whole set doesnt go together unless its all up there in one pic. (P.S I seriously cba looking at 4 pics for each profession and im sure a lot of people feel that way)
 * I'm going to bring this back up because I think its an important issue. I'm well aware that this is not an actual set of armor. That nowhere in game does it say "Dwarven armor" however, it is still referred to and talked about as though it were a complete set. Having the galleries not show it as a complete set at least in some pictures is confusing and makes it hard to look up. If I see a girl wearing all the pieces for the set, its hard for me to tell what the set is if I were interested in seeing it closer here without having at least one good shot of the complete set (front back and profile). I think the best idea would have the piece names refer to a single "Dwarven armor page" which can show each piece and also have a normal style gallery for the entire set. It's more important to provide useful information than to keep things perfectly technical as its not a set. Currently the whole thing is a mess. There's articles for pieces, which don't show for all sides, the Dwarven armor pages show all pieces but just from the front and not as a set and this page and the profession armor pages show it as a set. &mdash; ♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 19:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Misleading?
Now correct me if I'm wrong, but Anet said there would be 40 new armor sets in GW:EN. Other than the obviously disappointing reskins of armor instead of new models, 'Dwarven' Armor isn't actually a set of armor. It's a collection of pieces, and the Hall of Monuments won't even recognize it. In essence, the promise of 4 new armor sets was only fulfilled on the Warrior who has Silver Eagle, even though that also does not count towards your HoM. So what are your opinions on this? Sirocco 10:20, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
 * wow now that you point that out im a little disappointed with Anet. --[[Image:Hellbringer siggy.jpg]] ¿ĤëĻĺßŔîÑģЄŗ? [[Image:Hellbringer siggy.jpg]] (talk|contribs) 16:50, 11 September 2007 (CDT)


 * Gaile/Emily/Someone on the official wiki (I can't be arsed to go find it) said that the original concept for Silver Eagle armor was to make it an elite armor set available to all classes. I'm guessing that their PR spiel about "40 new armor sets" was counting the Norn, Asuran, Monument, and Silver Eagle armors, and was spun up long before any of them were fully implemented into the game.
 * Gaile/Emily/Whoever then said that they scrapped the Silver Eagle armor concept after only implementing the warrior version, then they decided to keep the warrior sets in the game anyway rather than let the designers' work go to waste. Thus we only have 30 new armor sets that go into the HoM, and the Warrior Silver Eagle set as the odd man out.
 * I agree, though: I am quite disappointed that they would plaster their "40 new armor sets" slogan all over their interviews, previews, and press releases, then just leave 1/4 of that out of the final release. Very bad move.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 22:36, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
 * There is a possibility that that they'll make these parts into a fully fledged armor set someday. The added armors to Prophecies before, why couldn't they just make matching gloves and headgears? &mdash; Poki#3 [[Image:Poki.jpg|19px|My Talk Page :o]], 03:18, 12 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Yeah, they did add armors. 2 Years later.--Cyruis 06:58, 12 September 2007 (CDT)

More Armor Details?
Would the people who posted pictures of each piece also put the crafting requirements and dye jobs on the accompanying pages? The elementalist one is perfect - can we mimic those pages for all the armor pieces? User:LikaiKailla

What a horribly awful idea
What's the point of having all these mismatched pieces? I don't get it no matter how much I try. I mean, it would make SOME sense if they had some special properties unavailable on any other armor piece for the profession, which would not stack between the 4 Dwarven pieces (ie can only wear one at a time to get bonus), or some other bizarre property unattainable otherwise, but they don't. So what's with all the special names? They just couldn't decide on which to make the 4th set for each profession? Or did each piece have its own designer who had no idea what the others were doing? RoseOfKali 02:52, 20 September 2007 (CDT)
 * And I fully expect them to complete the Silver Eagle sets for the remaining 9 professions, or else I'll take them to court on misleading claims of "40 New Armor Sets." (Nah, too much trouble. ^_^) "#$%#!!" RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 02:52, 20 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Well the part about "set" can be stretched pretty far. Remember, a lot of prophecies armor doesn't have headgear, thus eliminating them as a "set". But everyone's been complaining way too much about the armor(I may even make a userbox showing my support for EotN armor) and think about it. How many armor pieces does 40 sets equal out to? 200. If you count the "true sets", that's 150, plus the dwarven pieces, you get uhh...just under 200, the fact that some don't get gloves is kinda stupid and tosses the numbers out. Now count in all the common armor (count it once for each profession) I'm pretty sure our total is now over 200. I can't be bothered to go out and count, but i'll guess at 300(Sure, why not?). So instead of the "promised" 200 pieces, we have roughly 300. Some of which can be gained in somewhat unique ways(Beating the snot out of a viking, for example). I really see no reason to complain. The only thing that bothers me is the Silver Eagle for only Warriors. It's a nice armor, but Anet definitely should've had it or an equivelint for each profession.--Darksyde Never Again 00:06, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
 * All Prophecies sets are just that, sets. A great multitude of armor sets do not have a matching headgear, and that is reflected in the Monument of Resilience, which only requires the 4 body pieces to display the armor set, even if it does have a matching headgear. And also, with the "piece" count, I think a set is a set, and random pieces have nothing to do with it.  Anet did not say "300 new armor pieces" but "40 new armor sets." There's a big difference.  Regardless, my main point is not in the piece count or set count, but in how the existing "Dwarven" pieces don't match each other's artwork at all, and some don't even have gloves. THAT is the mess which I call a "horribly awful idea."  I mean... WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? O_O RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 04:34, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
 * I agree with you on the gloves part, that does suck. But i think it qualifies as a set so long as each piece is from the same crafter. You got a chestpiece, gloves, pants, and shoes. IMO, that'a a set. This is just a new thing...where the set doesn't match up. It's meant to mix and match with other "sets". I'm happy with the armors from EotN, and real sick of people's complaints.--Darksyde Never Again 07:29, 24 September 2007 (CDT)

Dwarven Armor Finally Finished
I just spent the last few days breaking up the sections on dwarven armour and trying to link them with the single components. For example the Warrior Dwarven armor shown on the Warrior armor page, now links to the Heavy Breastplate, Ironfist Gauntlets, Stalwart Leggings and Sturdy Boots. I've created and edited over a 100 pages to try and get this to look good and work well, so I'd appreciate any comments that may help. For now, a lot of the images are placeholders and don't show the individual pieces very clearly. --Krytan Sentinel 19:56, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
 * That was a lot of effort. Good job.  However, I still think that Warrior Dwarven armor should stay and include links and/or images of all four corresponding pieces, for organization's sake.  This is already represented on the Warrior page, just under the crafting info.  That is all that's needed, once the images are corrected.  Plus the frontal view of all the pieces together (no gloves of any kind, if none are available from this crafter), should also be there, one for each male and female, and that should be the single image on the profession's armor reference page, e.g. on Warrior armor down in the EOTN/Dwarven slot.  Things like "Component View" or back/profile are not needed for all the pieces together, just for the individual pieces on that piece's page.  All this, of course, is true for all the other professions.  The pieces do come from the same crafter, and thus should be organized as such.  RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 04:48, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
 * I think it should still have component view but also have an overlook of the whole armor itself. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 00:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I concur with Hellbringer, I cannot decide if I want to get any of the pieces if I can't see how they fit together, and oh how I do hate mixing and matching. Matrim [[Image:Squirrel crossbow.png]] 22:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

The Salvage Item?
There's a Salvage Item called "Dwarven Armor". I think it'd be good to add a "this article refers to such and such, for the salvage item see whatever article". No disambiguation page needed, as very few will want to see the salvage item compared to this.--Darksyde Never Again 19:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Eh
Jeez, can't someone just puit what it all looks like together in here?--‎ Spam  King  16:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * There's 7 seperate pieces of armor. It's not a set, eh --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 16:37, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * idk. Just put them together and take a screenshot. I just want ele.--[[image:Spam_King_Sig.gif|19px]]‎ Spam  King  16:40, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree. It looks crappy to not have a complete image of what all the pieces look like together. Retro77


 * I know they aren't technically a set, but we realy should have a full outfit picture since most people are going to wear it as a set anyway.--UberNoober 21:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)