User talk:64.229.196.153

Hi
We have a policy here of Only revert once. If you disagreed with Tetra's reverts, you should explain in talk instead of simply reverting (and losing important changes in the process). &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 19:46, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * Apparantly, yours admin truly has blocked me. --64.229.196.153 19:50, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * You are playing a very dangerous game. Ban notice added. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 19:55, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * Aside from stabber's attitude, the policy Only revert once is a real one. If you believe the information was wrong, please discuss it on the talk page of the relavent article.  Do not assume other users/admins can tell which side is correct.  By discussing it on a talk page, you get your opportunity to present your case of why you are correct and the other side is wrong.  The act of simply reverting, saying the other side is wrong, but offering no furthur explanation, only encourages the other party to revert what you have reverted.  In the end we'll have 20 reverts without making any progress.  That is the reason the policy exists. -PanSola 20:05, 6 May 2006 (CDT)