User talk:Jupsto/Archive 1

Userpage
About your question: 'WHY IS IW SLASHER BETTER THEN IW WARRIOR?' Well the IW Warrior has some serious energy problems. -- S i  g  m  A   09:47, 31 January 2007 (CST)

wrong again. i'm fine on energy with it even if not using ether signet. Jupsto

About your usebox. You say you don't like Wammo's. What's the problem? -- S i  g  m  A   08:36, 1 February 2007 (CST) how do u get pictures on your signiture? 18:03, 1 February 2007 (CST)

I'm sure there are some good warriors out there. But generally I find so many noobs play W/Mo especially in PvE and they all think they are so great. They all do a Leeroy Jenkins thinking they are invincible and make us lose. And most warriors have poor damage compared with compared with assassins and pretty much every other proffesion. Some builds are an exception to this. They generally just dont have any brains.

An example is when I was on the Drought mission in nighfall the only players i could find was a team of warriors. Dispite what i said they didn't seem to understand that they could do 0 damage to the drought, anyhow we did started and they wanted to to it elite since they are so invincible. We did kill the dought as I put backfire, empathy and other armour ignoring skills which owned it. They probably still think they killed it tho.

Image is image:"name of image".jpg|19px --look on edit

Jupsto

FYI, noone is required to test a build at all before voting on it. So not sure what you mean by that userbox. Entropy 06:15, 2 February 2007 (CST)

Quote from any un-tested disscussion: ''Please test and vote on new builds. Please do not vote on a build until you have actually tested it.'' Jupsto

Yes, and do you know what Please means? Besides, that's not the current edition of the R-a-b. Entropy 06:19, 2 February 2007 (CST)

OK, I dont think anybody has tested the builds I have contributed, that is what my user box is about. Which most people may consider as a stupid system. Jupsto