GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Warwick (4)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Warwick (talk &bull; contribs &bull; Edit Count)
Very competent with wiki and all around HMTL formatting, constant and frequent activity. She is also interactive with the community and its members. She has a long time in the wiki with many if not all positive contributions to the mainspace. Zulu Inuoe 21:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Oh what? Its real? =|. Thanks Zulu. I guess I accept, but I know that everyones going to write an oppose based on the new wiki. So eh... &mdash; Warw/Wick 21:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

RfA closed on 4-12-08: candidate unsuccessful.

Support

 * 1) Cause everyone else will go oppose.--[[Image:AlariSig.png]] 21:41, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, she is a decent contributer if not controversial, I personally don't think we need more sysops at the moment but meh--[[Image:AlariSig.png]] 22:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Made a GuildWiki2 even though most didn't want it. [[Image:Thoughtful-new-sig.jpg]] Thoughtful 21:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Can I just note, What does that have to do with a RfA? &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 21:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You do things even though people say no. [[Image:Thoughtful-new-sig.jpg]] Thoughtful 22:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) I like May very much as a friend and fellow wikier, but the amount of controversy that surrounds her would likely only increase were she to be an administrator.  Particularly at this time; many members of the community stand against her on the GWiki2 issue, and she wouldn't gain the respect needed as a sysop. [[Image:Maui_sig.png]] 22:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I voted support on Warwick's last RfA because I thought she deserved a chance to redeem herself. Unfortunately, she blew it and turned the whole thing into a public spectacle. I still consider Warwick my friend, but I do not believe she would make a good sysop; many of the things she does are merely desperate grabs for attention, such as pasting huge amounts of code to her talk page or creating a new wiki. She has shown time and again a lack of maturity, an inability to consider other people's points of view, and an intolerance for anyone who criticizes her. I realize this sounds incredibly rude, mean, and harsh, but I think that in this case, honesty is paramount. Warwick should not be a sysop. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 22:42, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Such timing. +1 for Zulu (and no, there's no sarcasm there). I'm not gonna vote oppose or support, because I'm biased. --[[Image:Progr.png]] -- talkpage 22:20, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) /agree Progger. neutral now. Cress Arvein(Talk) 22:37, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.