GuildWiki:No original builds

The Build: namespace of GuildWiki is to document Flavor of the Month (FotM) PvP builds and easily-verifiable PvE Running/Farming builds. All original builds must reside on userspace, and will be treated as such; nobody but that user should be heavily altering builds on that userspace (minor grammar/spelling error correction is fine, as always).

Reasoning:
 * If it works and is worth it, it's been done already.
 * An actual FotM has never originated from GuildWiki.
 * Genuine winning ideas generally spread like so:
 * Guild chat, IRC rooms, Vent
 * TV (Observer), playing against the build, etc.
 * Forums
 * GuildWiki documentation. This is what we do best. GuildWiki comes nowhere into the development - there is not one example on the site that used the wiki instead of the above.


 * Build: namespace should be here to document popular builds, not be a bed of development.
 * Original builds will be moved to userspace, where the author is in charge of it; discussion about it, and the build itself.
 * The author can put a tag (not finalized, obviously) on their build to attract people to it, so others test it and give feedback.
 * No voting will take place on builds, period. All builds in the Build: namespace are easily verifiable, and all userspace builds are for user documentation/tweaking; no voting is required for either.

Advantages

 * Take the crap out of the Build: namespace.
 * Reduce violations of GW:NPA by promoting a more friendly environment.
 * Rebuild the wiki's reputation as a documentation site, and not as a joke.

Disadvantages

 * None, surprisingly.

Suggested criteria for inclusion
Guild Battles (GvG): Obs mode.

Heroes' Ascent (HA): HoH obs mode, top 100 obs mode (for Global Tournament).

AB/CM: These will be considered original builds, and are to be hosted on userspace.

TA: Again the question would be "Do I see other people running this build in TA, how often do I see it run?" This one gets a bit more subjective, but the criteria does become which versions are run the most and which versions do I see run?

RA: To be considered original builds. None worth documenting, aside from obviously FotM builds (i.e., Touch Rangers).

PvE general/PvE hero builds: All original.

PvE farming/running builds: These actually do seem to work as is. The question is simple "Does this build successfully farm the area that it claims to?"