Talk:Zombie Warlock

AL Research
Regular AL: 43 (Slashing, Blunt, Fire, Water, Air, Earth)

From the lack of Blunt penalty, zombie warlock are probably not skeletons (though Skeletonslaying has the final say). -PanSola 17:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thinking that they aren't skeletons, they leave exploitable corpses. --Rainith 21:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Do they take extra damage from Smiting? Maybe they aren't 'undead', despite being called Zombie. --JoDiamonds 07:54, 28 March 2006 (CST)
 * I don't remmeber, but I'm willing to bet money that holy does double to them. -SolaPan 08:08, 28 March 2006 (CST)

They seem to be undead. --Gares Redstorm 08:50, 28 March 2006 (CST)

Duh note
[ this]. 1RV is in the way. It's an Undead, so it takes double damage. Want to add that to EVERY Undead? Even the name implies Undead...... --- -- (s)talkpage 14:22, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it's a helpful note in this case. The Zombie Warlock can confuse some players. Olim Thrice 17:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it's worth noting for the rare cases of fleshy undeads. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 18:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not 'rare' when you have nearly a half dozen fleshy undead types in Kryta -all of which are commonly encountered. Anyway, the point I made concerned the Zombie Warlock, whose skeletal appearance can be deceiving. Olim Thrice 18:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Fleshy undeads are not rare, all mummies, and all "zombie" undead are fleshy. There used to be a separate category, but it was done away with. I honestly think it should be brought back though, there's more than enough candidates for it.&mdash; Powersurge360 Melancholia  19:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)