User talk:Skuld14148

new +

Blocking
I know we've just rid ourselves of Penalties for abuse but 1 week for making a pointless page? Harsh man harsh! --Xasxas256 07:15, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I usually do 1-3 days for vandalism of existing and 1 week for creating vandalism pages, too much? &mdash; Skuld 07:16, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I reckon, I mean it was just one off gibberish, I mean if it was racist or done multiple times after being warned that's different. Well you're the admin but yeah I do reckon possibly a bit harsh. --Xasxas256 07:18, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I'm not an admin, but yes, I think so. Remember that many of such edits may just be new/young/stupid users trying stuff out. Give them the benefit of the doubt and only hammer hard on the real vandals, imho. -- [[Image:Bishop_icon2.png]] Bishop [ rap|con ] 07:20, 8 August 2006 (CDT)

Ok, 3 days now &mdash; Skuld 07:22, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I personally don't think that any penalty needs to be handed down on somebody who vandalises an article as a once off. --Xasxas256 07:29, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * It's more to ward them off doing it again and leave an entry in the block log for future reference if they do it again. If someone creates a page as their only contribution then it gets deleted, their contribution log is empty &mdash; Skuld 07:31, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I agree with your sentiment, Skuld (although I'd most likely just block for 1 hour because it serves all those purposes equally well without being as harsh). -- [[Image:Bishop_icon2.png]] Bishop [ rap|con ] 07:33, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Never knew it was possible to block for below one day. Default list goes 1, 3, week, 2 weeks. Knew you could set custom but though it had to be in days+ :o &mdash; Skuld 07:37, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Yep I like 1 hour, also I think if it's just testing/gibberish testing type edits then we should put a note saying welcome, please don't vandalise, use the Sandbox, you've been blocked for 1 hour blah blah. 1 hour should give them a chance to read it. --Xasxas256 07:39, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I'd agree. More than 1 day for anything that might just be a new user playing around (stupidly) is harsh.  1 hour is probably fine.  Any kind of commercial ads or racism, etc., go ahead and bring a gigantic hammer down.  --JoDiamonds 15:34, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * huh, I wonder if we have different settings. The default durations available on my screen are 2 hours, 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, infinite, or other. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:55, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * I guess I'm a jerk. I'll do 1 day for something trivial, but usually a week for anything else. &mdash;Tanaric 17:49, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * One week doesn't seem too harsh. People won't die if they lose a week, and they sure will refrain from screwing up in the future too. /cheer Tanaric :)  --ShmEk 23:23, 17 August 2006 (CDT)

back already?
just saw an edit by you in recent changes, that must be the fastest vacation on record. ;) --Honorable Sarah 16:06, 18 August 2006 (CDT)

Happy Birthday!!
<3 <3 <3 Foo 20:16, 18 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Well done mate, a quick Wikipedia search shows that drinking and driving are still out but AoC is in, so have fun with whatever you get up to! ;) --Xasxas256 00:48, 19 August 2006 (CDT)
 * rofl! Foo 03:40, 19 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Xas is either taking this too seriously or has really lost his pants. Anyway, Happy Birthday Skuld! --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 04:35, 19 August 2006 (CDT)

Ty ^^ I'm nearly old :p &mdash; Skuld 05:45, 20 August 2006 (CDT)
 * So what did you get up to!?!! ;) --Xasxas256 06:01, 20 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Nothing yet, recovering from jetlag ;( &mdash; Skuld 06:02, 20 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Sorry I missed the party, but Happy Birthday! &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 23:28, 22 August 2006 (CDT)

Scrutinizing the scribe
Hey Skuld, do you have that topic on GWG that mocked the scribe? --Jamie  06:15, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 'fraid not :( Looked through 7 pages of riverside and didn't catch my eye, google didn't return anything either &mdash; Skuld 06:50, 21 August 2006 (CDT)

Ban
I don't think he deserved a ban. That seemed like pressing the wiki edit toolbar randomly to test tihngs. Atleast it seems so from the delete summary. -- (talk) 06:49, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Save button is clearly marked &mdash; Skuld 06:50, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Skuld is faster and meaner than you! Being serious for a sec I'm probably leaning towards Gem but I'm just a softy. Sometimes. --Xasxas256 06:52, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Sandbox, user space, preview, all useful for testing. main namespace isn't a playground. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 10:44, 21 August 2006 (CDT)

Dark Apostasy
Your new assassin build looks nice, be sure to Build it, when you've completed it ;)~Shadou 10:08, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Thanks :) I have all the stuff unlocked but I want to test on my PvE 'sin, need to get around to buying another mask and gloves and getting to Amatz Basin &mdash; Skuld 11:02, 21 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Have a play with the build on my Userpage if you are interested in doing some _real_ damage, like a proper 'sin ;] ~Shadou 08:24, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
 * With 12 daggers?.. &mdash; Skuld 08:17, 23 August 2006 (CDT)
 * He makes up for it by having 235 attribute points. --68.142.14.35 08:37, 23 August 2006 (CDT)

Nightfall Builds
could you comment on the disposition of nightfall builds here? --Honorable Sarah 16:51, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
 * hmmm ... moved to here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:44, 22 August 2006 (CDT)
 * bump. I'm asking several admins to take a look and voice opinions. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:50, 23 August 2006 (CDT)
 * In response to you'r vote, couldnt a move and retag remove your reasoning for delete? remove the "untested" and add in the C3 tag, and move them to namespace but give them a Prerelease Build tage stating that the builds will likely change and are just there for informational purposes to provide concepts for builds once the game is released. This would IMO allieviate the problem of people having to patrol them WHILE allowing those of us who want this to remain for inspiration. --Midnight08 06:37, 24 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Fine with that too. &mdash; Skuld 06:38, 24 August 2006 (CDT)

out of process deletion of refund point
GuildWiki talk:Criteria for deletion