User talk:84.251.83.24

Please stop editting The Lost Princess with changes that do not comply with the S&F/Quests guide. Make yourself familar with the formatting guides before changing more quest articles. --Wolfie (talk|contribs) 09:25, 20 June 2007 (CDT)


 * What is wrong with those changes? &mdash; Skuld 09:29, 20 June 2007 (CDT)


 * The S&F/Quests guide states to use " " beside skill rewards and the idea of a S&F guide to maintain a consistent look to all articles. Secondly, if the consensus was to change profession names to the icons, surely using "" would be better than "[[Image:Monk-icon-small.png]]" which would use less characters.  But the main point is, if this anon user wants to change the standard so badly (this same change has been made twice in under 24 hours), then should go through the correct process like everyone else. That's my thoughts anyway. --Wolfie [[Image:Wolfie_sig.jpg|19px]] (talk|contribs) 09:46, 20 June 2007 (CDT)


 * Sorry I copied format from quest The_Royal_Papers. 84.251.83.24 09:38, 20 June 2007 (CDT)


 * hehe, ok, see this is how thing go "off the rails" in regards to maintaining a consistent "look", will fix that one up too, thanks for highlighting that. --Wolfie [[Image:Wolfie_sig.jpg|19px]] (talk|contribs) 09:46, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

FYI: Decided to take this question to the S&F/Quests talk page, that way everyone interested can have their say and hopefully a majority preference one way or the other will emerge. --Wolfie (talk|contribs) 10:19, 20 June 2007 (CDT)

I could care less what S&F said, what is wrong with those changes? &mdash; Skuld 10:37, 20 June 2007 (CDT)


 * consistency between articles? same reason i went through all the skill articles and standardized them. BTW wolfie, do not revert a revert, or revert a revert of a revert. Both of you are in the wrong and should of brought it up on the article talk page and got someone else to agree with your PoV, even if it was in the S&F. -- Xeon 10:48, 20 June 2007 (CDT)


 * "consistency between articles?" hehe, yeah novel concept eh! "and should of brought it up on the article talk page" Precisely why the question was taken to the S&F/Quests talk page (since this will effect the overall "standard", figured better to have the discussion there instead of on one particular quest's talk page), but yes I did exceed the 1RV rule, but my intent was to "nip it in the bud" before too many changes got made and we started having two "competing" formats. --Wolfie [[Image:Wolfie_sig.jpg|19px]] (talk|contribs) 20:51, 20 June 2007 (CDT)