User talk:Elitemaster

Why do you feel the need to remove unfavored votes from a/e poisonous dancing leaf? The vote placed there is valid and it is against policy to remove it. Lord of all tyria 13:33, 27 February 2007 (CST)

I removed them cause :
 * - one was being posted for name
 * - one was being posted for no good reason wihtout giving any reason or suggestion

For revision I m sorry... wont happen again.. I appologize for that.

But for users like Sigm@ who are totally untrustable and unfavored by community.. Posting Unfavored votes for no reason just for their grudge and ego for someone, is that valid?? I hope admin do something about it..

Sorry again for Revision .. wont happen again!!
 * I restored the vote to the page. Per GW:VETTING, no reasons are required to make the vote count.  It's a flawed procedure, but it's the one we're stuck with.  Note per the procedures: "Do NOT strike out other people's votes or delete them for any reason."  --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:47, 27 February 2007 (CST)


 * Well if you really wanna do something than block unfavored and dishonest users as per voted by community!!!
 * For rest I have nothing to say nor I can do anything for this..
 * "Rate-a-user" is a joke tag, with no validity for anything on this site - no policy or procedure makes those mean anything. Many of the users on his talk page understand that and gave joke posts in it.
 * You should be warned to be very careful how you post in Rate-a-user areas, as they are potential paths for GW:NPA violations. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:09, 27 February 2007 (CST)
 * Ok thanks this is ridiculous and in future someday you will regret allowing persons with this sort of behaviours, anyways thanks for giving instructions. C ya to you and this community.. enjoyed nice and great stay!!! This really SUX thanks thanks :D :D
 * You may take any action on my accout as you like, I dont care now and thanks for this ENJOY!!!
 * I wont be returning here anymore :D!!

Behavior
Actions that you have displayed in Build talk:A/W Moebius Impaler and Build talk:A/E Poisonous Dancing Leaf towards other users violates GW:NPA. Any further actions of this nature will result in administrative action. &mdash; Gares 18:17, 27 February 2007 (CST)

O Really !!! Than what about them.. Criticizing me for no good reason !!!
 * Dw, check my usertalk as well, I got one. Lord of all tyria 12:05, 28 February 2007 (CST)


 * Well Gares, I m sorry about being so angry and going so harsh due to that Chaos, I apologize for it. In future, I will take care that thing doesnt happen again. :) --Elite [[Image:MissionIcon sml.png]] 12:21, 28 February 2007 (CST)


 * You were previously warned. You have again violated GW:NPA by today's posts on Build talk:A/any Deadly Dancing Leaf. As a result, a three day ban is being applied. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:27, 1 March 2007 (CST)
 * Correction - I see that you removed the newer violation yourself before anyone else had a chance to reply to it. As such, I've also removed the ban. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:32, 1 March 2007 (CST)

Your signature
According to the signature policy the icon file must be unique and may not be higher than 19 pixels. -- (talk) 06:47, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * Well thanks for noting me that Gem, I m new to this community so i didnt know, But i have seen many people with icons higher than 19 pixels and besides my icon aint that big or annoying :P - Elite - [[Image:MissionIcon sml.png]] 23:40, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * Well, you are still breaking a policy so could you please change it? If others are breaking it too, please tell them to change their sig. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 02:31, 3 March 2007 (CST)