User talk:Dr ishmael/Archive 1

by typeing ~ you can timestamp your comments. See Sign your comments--Draygo Korvan (Yap) 10:11, 30 June 2006 (CDT)

E/any Dual Attunement Nuker
if you look at the talk page of that build, you'll see it has been deleted once before. please be sure your new build can stand to the pre-existing comments. --Honorable Sarah 13:45, 22 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Yeah, I noticed that after I posted the article. I'm pretty sure my build can stand to those comments, though - it's not for AB, I don't use Mark of Rodgort, and it's sufficiently different from the Heavy Nuker (IMO).  Dr ishmael 13:54, 22 August 2006 (CDT)

Editing
Hi. When editing your user page, please use the 'minor edit' check box. Also, you might want to use the 'Show preview' button more often. -- (talk) 19:41, 25 August 2006 (CDT)

Signature
Just looking at your signature bit in your sandbox. I've just been playing around with mine. You know you can put the bit in the "Signature" bit of your preferences, then just use ~, which will add the date automatically? You probably already know but just in case, will save you some time on talk pages :) —Biscuits (talk contribs) 11:26, 21 November 2006 (CST)


 * I had wondered about that. Thanks for the tip. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] (talk|contribs) 11:41, 21 November 2006 (CST)

dont add quests to acqu
it was decided to not add quest data to the acquisition sections on skill pages. "You're All Alone!" Magehunter's Smash Xeon 20:36, 27 December 2006 (CST)

Category:Collectors format standardization campaign
While doing research for my User:Dr ishmael/Collectable trading article, I noticed that a lot of the collector and collectable drops pages had inconsistencies and even errors in both their content and formatting. I corrected some of these, but only where it was obvious; I know there are still a lot of problems.

Since the collectors already have a style guide, I'm going to work on them first - I plan to find them all in-game and verify all their info, as well, since I already noticed a few that were incorrect. When that's done, I'll write a style guide for collectable drops (adding it to the Items style guide) and work them over as well. &mdash;Dr Ishmael (talk|contribs) 12:10, 1 February 2007 (CST)


 * Cheers, and you work too hard. :) Entropy 15:45, 1 February 2007 (CST)

Clarifying 1RV misunderstanding
"Reverting" a page is to restore it to its previous state. Therefore, if you make a new change to a text, and this change is reverted, it does not constitute a breach of the 1RV policy. mikkel 15:04, 11 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Right: If you find your edit was reverted, take your case to the article's talk page. (from GW:1RV) You made the revert, so I can't revert back.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] (talk|contribs) 15:30, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Re: Disambiguation
Click-ity click! --Ishmaeel .ping ; .peek; 10:21, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

cats
check the categories before you remove a stub. -- Xeon 10:25, 9 May 2007 (CDT)

Vanquisher
Hi, on the vanquisher page, stating that you are 'completing' a quest seems redundant since that tab is only for quests that affect the number of enemies... hence while the quest is active and whether or not you are completing it. It should be in a similar format as all the other quests. Rcollins779x 18:32, 24 May 2007 (CDT)

Greetings. I noticed you reverted a change someone made on the Vanquisher page regarding Bukdek Byway. Whoever changed this to one is correct. If you have both The Drunken Master and Chasing Zenmai active, all you need to do to vanquish this zone is to defeat the Drunken Master. I have verified this, as it is how I vanquisher Bukdek. -- Ale 13:19, 30 July 2007 (CDT)


 * Oh, I get it now. The way they made the edit didn't make any sense because they didn't make it link correctly to the quests.  I'd forgotten about the "The Drunken Master" quest, and thought they were just being funny making it say "Zenmai and Drunken Master".
 * Still, as that is a special case, it should be mentioned in a footnote like the one for Zen Daijun. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 17:26, 30 July 2007 (CDT)
 * I agree, a footnote is probably best, but your Summary note said "Huh?" so I wasn't sure if you knew about the special case. Cheers. --[[Image:Flask_Of_Firewater_small.jpg]] Ale 18:08, 30 July 2007 (CDT)

Sortability at Collecting for fun and profit
Please see my response at that talk page, and thank you for commenting. 15:42, 21 July 2007 (CDT)

EotN and Collectors
I was wondering if you were working on another section to the "Collecting for fun and profit", for EotN collectors. Since all of EotN is "L20 high end campaign", all the collector items are by default maxed. However, I was not sure if any/all gave profit for collecting (since I don't actually have it yet >.>)...no unique collectables other than the Armors are available, so for me the only reason I have to keep and collect EotN drops is if I can make some cash profit. Otherwise I would just trade in stuff from other campaigns, since that's easier... (T/C) 00:43, 16 September 2007 (CDT)


 * Nope, Anet made sure there was absolutely no profit in collectibles this time. All collectibles are worth at least 20g to the merchant, all collectors want at least 5 of an item, and all collector items are only worth 100g.  The best you can do is break even.  Unless some odd item like Aged Dwarven Ale has a really high market value for some reason, there won't be an EotN section to that article.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 11:43, 16 September 2007 (CDT)


 * Aww, damn. Well thanks for checking. I can finally go sell off all those collectable drops I got in the Sneak Preview Weekend. >.> (except for Superb Charr Carving, lol) [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 11:45, 16 September 2007 (CDT)

Interwikis
Hello. GuildWiki has recently updated its interwiki map. This means that w: now points to Wikia instead of to Wikipedia. You have one of these links on your user page. You can change it to point at Wikipedia by changing the w: to wikipedia:. Angela 07:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Just want to thank you for the effort you put into the weapon QRs. Unfortunately, the only thing I have to offer in appreciation is Lyssa's Cookie of Bemusement. Even though what you didn't isn't funny at all (in fact, it's very serious), I hope you'd accept a cookie as a token of my appreciation. -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 19:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Considering how I have absolutely nothing to do at work right now - and may not for a while, we've been slow all month - my brain was eventually going to melt out my ears anyway. It was either do this or keep playing Free Rice all day, and I think I've donated enough rice already this month...  Anyway, thanks for the cookie!  I made a userbox for it. :D  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 19:53, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to say that you've been doing more work lately than the rest of us combined. Thank you. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 04:52, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * o: All done, great job there. =) J Striker 08:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Special:Newpages 'Nuff said. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 06:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Here's the official appreciation: Lyssa's Toast of Appreciation. Same effects though, cuz I kind of lumped all the cool effects I can think of into one big package already. -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 23:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Bot Mode.. Disabled (Concise descriptions)
Hehe, nice job with all of the concise descriptions. :) &mdash; Warw/Wick 12:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Bot mode, wha? >.> Just another case where I was momentarily bored with playing the game, browsing the wiki, noticed something missing, and decided I'd add it.  And I do kinda go into a "bot mode" mentally with tasks like this, or the weapons QR project... which I need to finish up soon... right after I finish this... <.<  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 16:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, question: I noticed that some people who'd already added concise descriptions had wikified them, while others didn't. My opinion is that everything's already wikified in the standard description, so there's no need to wikify the concise one as well.  Was there a discussion on this somewhere that I should read? &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 16:15, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Drat, while you're adding the concide descriptions it's not updating the Category:Skills_missing_concise_description category correctly, 'suppose I'll be making some null edits to update the category. --[[Image:OrgXSignature.jpg]] 18:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I believe that's happening because the skill articles get that cat from the skill template, within which the cat is only specified in an parser function.  I think I read somewhere that the wiki should update stuff like that once per day, but I dunno if Wikia has it set up that way or not. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 19:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Good work! And no, there hasn't been a discussion (that I know of), but since as far as I know the general rule is one link to a specific thing in an article, only the full description would have the links. --Shadowcrest 18:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, it's usually 1 link per section, but both descriptions are still in the same section. That's what I'm going with then. I won't bother de-wikifying ones that already have it, though. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 19:00, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh crap, I really screwed up. The coding includes any page that the template is included on, including using templates that are transcluded by another template.. Dammit! &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 19:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Bah, I'm relying too much on Firefox's auto-complete to fill in the edit note. So if anyone sees weird notes (like the one on Oppressive Gaze saying the concise description is identical), just ignore them. ^^; &mdash;Dr Ishmael  20:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

hey (Concise - why wikify)
I got more info on the concise stuff. But I have to find it. But I do know that it said to wikify stuff in the concise descriptions; it'll make sense when I find the post. --Shadowcrest 00:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Found it. Read Jedi's posts here. --Shadowcrest  00:59, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Fudgemuffins. *grumblegrumble* &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 01:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Just so you know, I don't expect you to go back through all the ones you've done and correct them :P --Shadowcrest  01:06, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I hate to do a job half-assed, even if I didn't realize it at the time. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 01:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd finished E, W, and most of R before you posted about this, and since then I was able to go back through all of them and wikify the concise descriptions. While doing so, I also took the liberty to standardize the wikification of both forms of skill description:
 * I left out links for terms like foe, damage, attack, etc. These are really basic things that anyone playing GW should already know, and they were already un-linked most of the time anyway.
 * I enforced wikification of Energy, since it was almost always linked, and I added links for adrenaline, which wasn't usually linked, because it is also "fuel" for skills, just like Energy is.
 * I fixed the capitalization of terms in the standard description after I noticed they were screwed up. In-game, Energy, Health, and condition names are nearly always capitalized, and other terms like spirit, skill, spell are hardly ever capitalized.  However, I noticed Spirit, Spell, and Skill (among others) capitalized quite often in the descriptions here.  Did they used to be capitalized and Anet changed it?
 * I enforced one-link-per-section within the standard descriptions. Most Nature Rituals had Spirit linked every time it appeared for some reason, and a lot of skills with both primary and bonus damage would have damage linked twice.
 * I'm gonna crash now, but I'll be back on this tomorrow. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 06:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmm, the monk skills seem to have a 50/50 split on wikifying heal. Since Heal redirects to Health, and most descriptions have both anyway, I wonder if this one really needs to be wikified. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 17:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Btw what's wrong with placing the concise description on the bottom of the template code? -- -- talkpage 16:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Nothing wrong with it exactly, it just makes more sense for it to directly follow the full description - especially when I'm comparing the wikification. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 16:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah ok, I'll think of it if I add more of them in the future. Luckily I did it right with the prot skills. --[[Image:Progr.png]] -- talkpage 16:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Editing Concise descriptions too? ;)
greetings theruon 18:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict - I demand your comment stay! XD) Yep. I'm going through by the standard profession order, and I'm double-checking everything that already has it, too. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 19:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm using the Category:Skills_missing_concise_description in the alphabetic order. Thanks to an edit of yours on one of my Skills - Castigation Signet - I'm going through them again - Wikifying >.< theruon 19:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Make sure you're using correct capitalization, too - I notice you capitalized "Skill" in you comment there, so I thought I'd mention it. I'm seeing a lot of normal descriptions that have capitalized words that shouldn't be, as I noted in the above section.  I haven't seen this in any of the concise descriptions (I haven't been looking at who added each one) yet, but just in case. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 19:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I usually don't capitalize anything, but when I do, I capitalize too much... But as I am just transcribing the descriptions from my guild's Priest of Balthazar that won't be a problem. theruon 19:56, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Coolies. I'll be watching for the inevitable edit conflicts when we cross paths. ;) &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 19:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)


 * That won't be a problem 'today' - my bed is waiting ;) theruon 20:04, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Star
RT | Talk  20:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)