File talk:Mini Grey Giant size.jpg

go back to the old version. this size you have no idea how big it is or that it is even actually a mini. &mdash; ♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 00:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Good point, but I'm putting an image update tag on it so someone will upload something that isn't clearly showing off --Gimmethegepgun 00:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * What would be "not showing off?" Please don't say without armor as that looks hideously unnatural. This picture was just reuploaded with a new name and it hasn't changed. I think that this image clearly shows the mini as the focus with a user in the background to show it is a mini and how big it is. It is a very natural looking shot as is. &mdash; ♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 00:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * That doesn't look like showing off to me. Maybe unequip the scythe, but other than that it looks fine. -- Shadow crest   00:32, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It is the scythe --Gimmethegepgun 01:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, why is a picture that shows a sweet scythe labeled Mini Grey Giant size? Oh, wait, it's supposed to be about the MINI GREY GIANT. That's why.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 01:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't even tell if you think the pic is okay or not MP! LOL. You honestly think that this picture is showing off the scythe? I think it just looks like a natural pose of a dervish standing around with, whats that? a mini grey giant! oh noes! The scythe is on a weird angle and you can't really see it clearly. Believe me, over the summer I tagged tons of weapon screens for update because they were glamor shots and I have a pretty discriminating eye for such things. I don't think this qualifies. I think this is a good shot that clearly shows the subject.
 * Now, if you personally feel that this image isn't the best, you can go out and find a replacement. You're personal issue (and I'm not directing this at Gimme, I mean anyone who reads) with the image doesn't mean that it requires an update tag. Those tags are generally for things that are lacking. Such as hard to see because it clips with armor, doesn't contrast with the background, has casting artifacts blocking the view, are insanely low quality, etc. This image can be updated, but it doesn't have to be. Now, this is my opinion on this. I am not going to remove the update tag if I am in the minority. I would like to ask for other people's opinions as I usually do. So... go opinions go!&mdash; ♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 01:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Opinion #1. Why do we need anything else in the shot? It should be about the Mini, not the dervish behind it. If it's for size comparasin, how about, IT'S LIKE ANY OTHER MINI: SMALL--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 01:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)