Template talk:Policy

Change proposal
"Please use the |talk page to propose changes" should be expanded to include "unless you're a Bureaucrat". (No, Pan, I don't mean you.) --◄mendel► 22:57, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you please stop proposing annoying changes like that just because of minor things like rewording? (Yes, it was pretty much just rewording, not some major policy change). There's no reason for that statement to be added.[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]] Entrea   [Talk]  23:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Taking away the mediator role from admins when we're just now discussing that very issue isn't all that "minor". It may turn out to be the right thing to have done, but still that makes this template be as wrong as that was. --◄mendel► 23:14, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * What's wrong here is that I express my displeasure with Auron's edit indirectly, by editing in a faraway place, instead where the discussion should be taking place, namely, Auron's talkpage. In that I am following Auron's lead, who with his edit weighs in on the debate going on at Warwick's RfA without actually posting there. Please don't construe that as intentional bending of rules or customs to make a point, I've just now realized that this is what I am doing. --◄mendel► 23:29, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, AUNC is an old and forgotten (and somewhat obsolete) policy that I doubt anyone but you remembers, so I hardly think it will have any effect on the RfA, except that now you brought it up. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 02:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, this ole' maid that is cited in nearly every power debate is definitely never remembered by anyone. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 02:42, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The only recent example I can remember of this being explicitly brought up is Warwick's RfA. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 02:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC)