User talk:Rexaar12973

Proposed Ban
Sarah... should we really be banning a user for a first offense (as far as I know) violation of GW:NPA? I thought the usual course of action was a warning followed by a ban only if the user repeated the infraction. We have two instances, he called users idiots (and was not warned for that), and then I warned him when he called us assholes. I agree that this is conduct unbecoming of an editor, but does it warrant a ban? (Note that this is an honest question on my part). Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 00:46, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
 * mine is not to wonder why, but simply to do and die. besides, i half expect the admin who reviews that page will see the user turned around as soon as the tag was applied, and just put a token ban of 1 minute. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 00:47, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Ah, alright. Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 00:49, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Thanks for the love guys, I'm really feeling it over here. Rexaar 00:59, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
 * You should review the Guildwiki Policies since you're new here. People aren't going to feel a lot of sympathy towards you if they look over your recent contributions, though. - [[Image:Candle.jpg|12px]] Krowman (talk • contribs) 01:02, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Thanks for the advice but I already did. As they say rules are meant to be broken. :p And by the way, I'm not going to feel anything anyway. Rexaar 01:06, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Per GW:NPA, the first response should be to ignore the infraction and move on - if it continues or you view it as an excessive violation, politely mention it on the user's talk page (not in the article's talk page). Usually, that resolves the issue.  Ban requests should only be placed when the user continues to violate policy after being made aware of site policy.
 * In this case, it appears that the user stopped violating policy once they were informed of the policy. I see no need for the ban at this time. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 11:20, 28 March 2007 (CDT)