User talk:Solus

{| class="boilerplate metadata" id="stub" style="text-align: left; background: white; margin: 0 2.5%; border: 1px dotted #009; border-collapse: collapse; width: 60%;" cellpadding="0" '''This user has been successfully vetted by the GuildWiki community according to the vetting procedure. I am your New Fuher! Bow down before me! '''
 * valign="middle" style="padding-left: 0.5em" | [[Image:Green thumbs up.png]]
 * style="padding: 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em" |

{|

Rate-a-user
Favoured:
 * 1) =) -- SigmA  14:44, 27 February 2007 (CST)
 * Um ok.... Solus [[image:Shield_of_Judgment.jpg|19px]] 00:45, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * 1) Singed my page too.- [[Image:Avatar of Lyssa.jpg|19px]] Leader Rat ( Sign ) 06:25, 6 March 2007 (CST)
 * 2) Well, you are a bit rash sometimes...but that means you're like me:)Cheese Slaya 18:54, 12 March 2007 (CDT) Cross out all the votes taht unfavoed you and you're gone.Cheese Slaya 17:02, 18 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 3) Kurzick! 8D --InfestedHydralisk 06:33, 10 March 2007 (CST)
 * 4) I often dis-agree with him, but at least he can be amusing. Jupsto [[image:Feck_Off.jpg|19px]] 18:47, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

Even
 * 1) HeHe signed my page ty. -- [[Image:Wingsthatheal-icon.jpg]] "Wings" 08:26, 2 March 2007 (CST)

Unfavoured
 * 1) You don't like people who support you? That is sad. :P (look at above comment) Maybe I'll get something if I vote unfavoured mwahahaa. --  Nova  [[Image:NovaSmall.PNG]] --  (contribs) 08:18, 2 March 2007 (CST)
 * 2) You're one to talk... and there are no apostrophes for "commas", nor have you used a fullstop. That's like saying "You're grammer is bad". Note that it's grammAr, not grammer. You don't take criticism well. Have you ever thought that other people might have a reason to think that they are right and you are wrong? There is nothing to suggest that we do not think before we make our comments.-Silk Weaker 02:44, 8 March 2007 (CST)
 * 3) Hi Mr.Grammar. Or gammer to quote you. :p I know it's your page,but why did you delete my comments? Anyway,TBH,I didn't like at all the way you reacted to my criticism. Please keep this comment and read it from time to time, eventually it'll help you solve solve some attitude problems of yours. --Babbo Elvis  17:04, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Who are you? Solus  [[image:Shield_of_Judgment.jpg|19px]] 21:56, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
 * ::One who h8s gammer. --Babbo Elvis 22:11, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
 * And what are you referring to? Solus  [[image:Shield_of_Judgment.jpg|19px]] 23:16, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
 * ::::Your attitude towards my (calm and reasonable) argumentation in an unfavored build whose name I dont remember(could always go find it) was always acid, you couldn't argue back,so you attacked my grammar repeatedly without answering to the critic. Only for that I'd call you immature, 'cause ,you know, not every person here is english mother-language.But you never give yourself the benefit of the doubt, do you? When I let you know that here in your userpage, you struck my vote twice cause of "grammar police" (?!?WTF?!?) and with harsh comments like "Until you can complete one full sentence, no voting for you".Blah I gave up. Then, yesterday I went and look at your userpage and poof, all the fact had been deleted. I checked history and it was you.. blah. grow up I say. And learn some respect, that attitude of yours only makes you ridiculous at the eyes of more mature people, believe me. If you wanna check the fact see your page's history. Stop thinking you're so smart,you're not.Not at all. Note: edited to correct the majority of my grammar mistakes ._.' --Babbo Elvis  07:21, 12 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) I can't describe Solus (without violating some thing), but all of those people who voted favored must not be on the wiki build section. He often votes unfavored for no reason (see one build below) and on one build, voted "cuz he's mean". --SBR 00:56, 12 March 2007 (CDT)
 * :Put it this way, somene better than you ^_^ Solus [[image:Shield_of_Judgment.jpg|19px]] 02:00, 12 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) [[Image:Canada_39x40.png|19px]] Thedarkmarine 01:01, 13 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) "never live up too?" Yet you consider yourself the grammar guy. Right. Never live up also/too much as opposed to the word to, which you meant but failed to type. Grammar owned the grammar guy. Don't mind me, i'm just being a smart ass. --- Nightshadow  [[image:Aura_of_the_Lich.jpg|19px]] 12:47, 12 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 1) Lets be like Solus, I'll vote unfavored "Cause I'm mean". Honestly man, can you at least make up a fake reason as to why you unfavor decent builds, rather than be erm, well...an ass.-- Llednar  [[Image:Assassin-icon-small.png]] 00:38, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Who wants to bet he'll strikeout this vote and post some rude/insulting defensive comment?

Alright, this is gone out of control. If you have to discuss, make a heading and discuss. This is my talk page on guildwiki, so please stop changing my comments. As such, the unfavored talk page is closed. Free feel to discuss. I test the majority of the builds I vote on or i've used similar, so please stop making stupid comments about how I vote. If your unhappy about a vote I've made, too bad. Solus  01:49, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Sure. It's you the comment changer though. --Babbo Elvis 10:35, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
 * [|This link shows the history.] You are the comment changer Solus.  You may want to rethink your accusation that we are the ones changing your comments. Kelvin Greyheart 12:14, 17 March 2007 (CDT)


 * 1) ^All above apply tenfold.Cheese Slaya 17:02, 18 March 2007 (CDT)

I was under the impression these were meant to be a bit of fun, go beat the shit out of each other in scrim if you got a grude, always works :p &mdash; Skuld 10:12, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

Orginally yes, but people take this too seriously. Solus  10:23, 12 March 2007 (CDT)


 * Well I strongly advise you get rid of it, you're attacking people in it and selectively removing comments. Stop doing these things or blank the thing fully. &mdash; Skuld 10:27, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

How am i attacking people? Solus  10:29, 12 March 2007 (CDT)


 * 1) he hates eveyone, i looked at his contributions, he is always saying this is junk. i doubt he even tests them b4 he looks at em. i saw a build out there that coudl pwn nehting, this suck he says...........

Other stuff
How many edits do you have to make geez... Use show preview before you make a post. For the record, American English is not the same as Australian English (ours is better). A simple mistake such as You're/Your is fine with me, You're/Ur isn't. Thankyou for the vote anyway, shows you care for me. I crave the attention lol. Solus  02:52, 8 March 2007 (CST)
 * Why do you say I use Australian English? I'm Chinese, Australian Passport, take Japanese, lived in Montreal for a while, and speak mostly American English, with some British tendencies (Skhedule vs Shedule). Please refrain from further racist comments. Though not completely Australian, Australian English is not "different". What my English is really different from is your English, because, simply put, your English is wrong on above cited examples... ie. all of them. Tell me one example where I have called your grammar wrong (this is after your attacks on others), and that it turns out that the English is not wrong and simply a different version (ie. Gray vs Grey) please. -Silk Weaker 03:46, 8 March 2007 (CST)

I refer to myself using Australian-English. You speak American Englsh, the languages are different in small ways. For the last time can you please use the show preview before you post your comments, I get so excited when you post on my page ; I can't take it! Solus  03:50, 8 March 2007 (CST)
 * I see then, my mistake. Now please cite examples of that occurence if you want to make a point. --Silk Weaker 03:51, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Most common (for me) is favour(Australian) and favor (American). Do you see my point? Solus  03:53, 8 March 2007 (CST)
 * That's same as the difference of American and British English. No, point not made. None of my accusations of bad grammar had to deal with those differences. I was refering to "Your" and "You're", and punctuation issues ("comma's", or omission of full stop.)-Silk Weaker 03:54, 8 March 2007 (CST)

O that, we'll I'm Australian, i talk slang. Solus  03:56, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Talk page
Yeh. Solus  00:55, 20 February 2007 (CST)

Ur sig was nicer with all the colours :-P -- SigmA 07:18, 23 February 2007 (CST)

Lol :) Least i learnt something in it Solus   10:28, 23 February 2007 (CST)

You need to do something with your icon, it doesn't redirect to your page, or else Gem is coming to get you! So remove it or make it redirect to your talk page ( I didn't succeed, I removed it =P) -- SigmA 13:36, 23 February 2007 (CST)

I have to save the picture then re upload it as a file i made? Solus  18:39, 23 February 2007 (CST)

I've got no idea... -- SigmA 11:50, 24 February 2007 (CST)

Spike Comparison: forked arrow followed by an interrupt


 * Brutal Weapon @ 10 communing: +12
 * Glass Arrows @12 expertise: +17
 * with Favorable Winds: +6
 * life stealing bow: +5
 * Total = +120 unconditional damage @14 marksmanship, assuming savage shot does not trigger the damage from interruption.


 * Kindling Arrows @11 wilderness: +18 (fire)
 * with Favorable Winds: +6
 * life stealing bow: +5
 * Punishing Shot @15 marksmanship: +20 dmg/1 arrow
 * Total = +116 damage, 54 of which is affected by armor.

Van Wark 01:45, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Wow my build owns. Solus  03:14, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Made enought loop holes rofl. Solus  03:31, 26 February 2007 (CST)

I am determined to get a build that you will vote favored on... >.< Flick through my Cons, you'll be suprized :) Solus   23:59, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Lyssa's Fury
Why vote unfavoured?--Eloc jcg 09:45, 2 March 2007 (CST)

Changed my mind, don't like the combo and needs a snare. I use a different combo which i prefer. Solus  00:11, 27 February 2007 (CST)
 * Ok, why change peoples votes? They voluntarely struck them out because they changed their mind.--Eloc jcg 09:45, 2 March 2007 (CST)

Build:D/A Lyssa's Fury
NOTICE: Do not change other people's votes for them. You should not strike out (or delete) or remove strikeout (or add votes) for any other users. Only the original voter can change their own votes (or, in VERY limited cases, admins can change the votes where vandalism/sockpuppetry/etc was involved). If someone strikes out their own vote, they are permitted to do that. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:46, 2 March 2007 (CST)

Build:D/Me VoS Eclipse
What would hex breaker do for the build jw? AmericanVlad 20:51, 3 March 2007 (CST)

Protect your from hexes? Solus  20:54, 3 March 2007 (CST)

Your build is basically designed to fight melee units, nobody that knows what spirt shackles will attack while under the effect of the hex. Mind wrack therefore won't work. Your wasting your primary attribute by assuming that people will fight back under spirt shackles. Your wasting 2 slots that could be used else where. Blackout is good with the Vos but killing oyur own energy under the assummtion people will fight back just won't work. Solus  20:56, 3 March 2007 (CST)

Does this look good? And would Diversion begood in the optional slot?

AmericanVlad 21:07, 3 March 2007 (CST)

Yes it does, diversion could be a good choice, but you'll need to cast hex breaker after you've used pious haste. Or you could use something like, Pious haste/Hex breaker (depending on the sitution) then wasterls worry, blackout and then Vow of Strenght for a small spike. Up to you though. Solus  21:20, 3 March 2007 (CST)

So Wastrel's worry in the optional slot? AmericanVlad 21:31, 3 March 2007 (CST)

I'd put it in variants, could be a nice little touch. Solus  00:34, 5 March 2007 (CST)

A vote, a signature, and a giant head...
...well, no giant heads in sight, so I'll just mention the vote and the signature.

on the Build:R/any Solo Totem Axe Farmer, you voted unfavored for what seem to be incorrect reasons... could you possibly have gotten something mixed up? Totem Axes drop randomly from Root Behemoths, which are not warrior bosses (not even bosses at all). They also have no way to remove stances, and the stances are only meant to run from Behemoth to Behemoth. I'm just mentioning this because I think you're thinking about a different axe maybe... and you've got about three people now trying to argue with you on the build's talk page. :D

As for the signature, I took the liberty of reading the rest of your talk page... SigmA's correct, your signature shouldn't be a shared image with another article or anything. Preferably, you'll need a image uploaded for use only in your sig. I've got some experience with uploading images and editing at whatnot... if you like, I can show you how to upload an image for your sig. Or I could maybe even make you a new image, if you want. Let me know? {Jioruji Derako} 22:35, 3 March 2007 (CST)

If you have concerns about the build, dicussion it on the build page. I don't give a dam about it, my votes my vote. Solus  23:20, 3 March 2007 (CST)


 * alright, sorry then. I was just curious as to what you meant the first time, and you weren't responding to anyone on the build page. All good now. {Jioruji Derako} 23:27, 3 March 2007 (CST)

I don't look back at every single vote i do. Solus  23:27, 3 March 2007 (CST)


 * I can understand that, I can only assume that not every vote you make ends up starting a discussion. Nothing wrong with someone mentioning it to you in such a case, right? :D {Jioruji Derako} 23:29, 3 March 2007 (CST)

I understand your point of view, i can tell your very defensive over your builds. Solus  23:30, 3 March 2007 (CST)


 * no, don't get me wrong, not trying to be defensive or anything. It's not even my build. I just happen to use it a lot, and with a good amount of success, so I was curious as to why you didn't think it worked. But that is a disccussion for the build's page, like you said. Hope I didn't come across as looking for an arguement, or anything. {Jioruji Derako} 23:35, 3 March 2007 (CST)

Alright... Solus  23:38, 3 March 2007 (CST)
 * Upload a picture via: special:Upload and redirect it to your userpage. --[[User:Sigm@|Sig mA.

]] 15:15, 6 March 2007 (CST)

Build:R/any Solo Totem Axe Farmer
My reasons regarding this hopeless build are on the thread, please do not discussion that joke on my talk page. Solus  23:16, 3 March 2007 (CST)
 * Would you mind clarifying your clarification? You've got me confused.  I have listed reasons why things are the way they are.  It can all be found on the builds usage section anyways.  What's missing?  Kelvin Greyheart 20:53, 4 March 2007 (CST)

Build talk:E/R EoE Bomb
You might want to take a look at your vote here. Its worded like a favored vote, but you put it in unfavored.--Coloneh RIP 01:26, 4 March 2007 (CST)

Playing round with stuff
Solus 

Gonna be postin up a few creative sigs, feel free to give suggestions. Yehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Solus   00:35, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Solus

Hi
Its one thing not knowing, but ignoring advice given to you is silly, and straying off-topic to pick fights is not acceptable. Please review No personal attacks and good day to you. &mdash; Skuld 03:10, 8 March 2007 (CST) I'm Arrogant, haven't you heard? Solus  03:11, 8 March 2007 (CST)

This is such a nice community. Solus  03:38, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Build talk:E/Rt Mind Blast Runner
Please avoid taunting or baiting of others, as that can be viewed as attempts to coax or prod them into violating GW:NPA. Doing so is generally disruptive. While I could understand the initial comment as being a misunderstanding, the repeated occurances of accusing Silk Weaker as being either banned or bannable combine to appear as attempted taunting. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:05, 8 March 2007 (CST)

That's the best you can come up with? Solus  00:00, 9 March 2007 (CST)
 * Don;t screw it for yourself.. --[[User:Sigm@|Σιγ <font color=#d8be01>μα

]] 12:26, 9 March 2007 (CST)

[[Image:Wingsthatheal-icon.jpg]] "Wings"
take a look at my talk page and see if you have any ideas about my build (bottom of page) -- "Wings" 10:22, 12 March 2007 (CDT) plz

Re: NightAngel's complaint on my talk page
You can bash the mentality, you can point out illogic, but don't personally attack other wiki users. Your first, second, and fourth sentences from your comment on Build_talk:R/any_Enraged_Pet_Ranger are unnecessary. They don't help your point. Don't do it again. Considering Barek's warned you above, and I've warned you now, you're likely to be tempbanned without notice next time something like this is seen by an administrator. &mdash;Tanaric 02:58, 17 March 2007 (CDT)

How is that a personal attack, is referring to a user considered a personal attack now? He did not understand what the build is used for, which I pointed out. Solus  03:02, 17 March 2007 (CDT)

Meh Idc. Solus  03:08, 17 March 2007 (CDT)

Deleting Things
'''I find your complete and utter dismisal of builds that you have clearly not tested to be rude. Then you start with random accusations about grammar. You clearly do not test half the stuff you vote on, which is not against policy, but you don't seem to take no for an answer and have taunted people on several occasions. Then dismissing your mistakes as "slang" or with the excuse of "I'm Australian" or my personal favorite "I'm Arrogant, haven't you heard?" One final note. I really don't care if it is your userpage. You have no right to remove what I said, and then contemptuously replace it with "My reasons regarding this hopeless build are on the thread, please do not discussion that joke on my talk page." Still no response about your vote there or on several other builds where you made comments that you voted on and people asked for clarification, which was immediately dismissed with a chain of attacks that did not answer the question to begin with. You are acting in an immature fashion in a way that is detrimental to the community as a whole. Kelvin Greyheart 21:04, 13 March 2007 (CDT)'''
 * Your deletion of my vote only shows your utter lack of respect towards others. And you have once again tossed something aside as if it beneath your notice. And regarding "please stop changing my comments" you may want to take a look at the history. You are the one who has made the majority of the changes to the comments here. I am not unhappy with you vote. You are entitled to your opinion. I am unhappy with your abysmal treatment of other peoples opinions. The complaint about "making stupid comments" is just another item in your growing list of derogatory behavior towards several people here. Considering how puzzling some of your remarks have been, it is only natural that someone is going to ask why you said that. Then you immediately assault them. I can cite examples if anyone wants proof (A good place to start is the previously deleted bold text above. [|See this link]). I suggest that you stop deleting stuff, crossing out votes, assaulting other peoples grammar (while dismissing yours as "slang" and "Australian"), and taunting people. Kelvin Greyheart 15:06, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Once again you have deleted my comments. I see no point in talking to a wall.  (BTW its not Kevin.  Just so you know). Kelvin Greyheart 14:42, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Once again you have deleted my comments. Notice how it is not in the voting area.  You said "Feel free to discuss" so here I am.  I am waiting for a response and all that has happened is that 4 of my posts have been deleted.  Kelvin Greyheart 12:14, 17 March 2007 (CDT)


 * This is his talk page. Provided he doesn't change the meaning of people's posts (ie: take them out of context, re-phrase, etc), he has the right to blank out posts to this page.  A user talk page is very different from any other talk space on the wiki. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:00, 17 March 2007 (CDT)


 * But on the same note, just as Solus is allowed to blank out whatever he feels like on his talk page, Kelvin isn't breaking any rules by re-posting, correct? Aside from being careful how you phrase yourself (so it doesn't come across as a personal attack), I can understand why someone would prefer to continue posting a question, if the only answer you have gotten so far is a repeated deleting of comments. (please correct me if I'm wrong, I couldn't seem to find much policy for dealing with a situation like this). I'm rather curious for a response, myself. --[[image:GEO-logo.png]] <font color="#237d00">Jioruji Derako.> 16:28, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
 * How about "be civil" "use common sense", oh wait, they aren't policies because they shouldn't need to be. &mdash; Skuld 16:39, 17 March 2007 (CDT)


 * If this is related to a particular build, I would take the discussion to the talk page for the build. If it's in regards specifically to the "rate-a-user" thing, then drop the issue - the rate-a-user threads were created as a joke that some seem to take too seriously - and which have been disruptive in the past and which only seem to act as a potential invitation for GW:NPA issues.  Technically, reporting the question after removal could be viewed as a GW:1RV issue.  Although, in a user space, that has never come up in the past that I can recall, so I would need to think about it.  --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:28, 17 March 2007 (CDT)