User talk:Readem

Hey, you finally decided to actually register yourself. Took you long enough! Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs)

If you want to actually vote for real on my nomination for Adminship, go to GW:RFA. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs)

Btw Defiant, I have over 5 accounts on the wiki. A few I have forgotten about,and some I was angry because people voted anon on my builds 2-3 times. I then decided to protest in a way, by signing my name anon. However, it seems my plan has ultimately failed, and I am tired of getting "55's" annoying message lol. So, I will find another way to protest. Also, like my page? Not bad speaking I have had this account less than a day XD. Readem 21:09, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

There, I voted. You happy :D? Readem 17:50, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

Help on user page appreciated
Can anyone show me how to change backrounds and create links to other pages on the wiki...so confusing lol. Any help is appreciated, thanks! Readem 17:50, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

Weird, user boxes shifted around... WTF!!! Why are my user boxes arranged differently on different computers...? Readem 22:04, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Different screen resolutions? --  Karalin [[image:Fireball.jpg|20px]] (talk|contribs) 18:33, 27 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Thats what I originally thought, but unfortunately no :(. Readem 21:53, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

I hope this helps any Defiant, I'll tell you when I am done w/ it. Readem 01:30, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

WTB` ....
What exactly are you trying to do with the WTB page? -- Xeon 03:00, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

I think he is trying to document vetted builds... but that belongs in the user space... I assume he just wanted to create Warrior Tested Builds (i.e. WTB) and didn't know where to put it. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs)
 * Oh a build master and Expert cryptographer I see lol. Readem (talk *contribs ) 01:26, 4 April 2007 (CDT)

Transferring everything on to a 2 gig floppy. I would hate to lose anything, don't worry, the pages will be deleted once transferred :D. Readem 04:06, 20 March 2007 (CDT)


 * ... You cant delete it, you should just be doing it on your local system instead of using gwwiki -- Xeon 03:06, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

Hmm, didn't know, srry. will transfer another way. Let me grab builds I have done so far though. Readem 03:07, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

Apoligize for any inconvienience I have caused. I did not relize. Readem 03:11, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

(Gah, edit conflict) I actually did the same thing :). I have all the old builds on a virtual drive on my computer for historical/personal reference.  Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs)

Build talk:W/D Enduring Scythe
You may wish to rethink your vote, as per my comment. --   19:39, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

Sorry, I have probably less of a life then everyone on guild wiki combined... literally. I am awake editing the wiki, til' around 3 in the morning everyday. The I wake up at 7, go to school, come home, play GWs and edit the wiki. Exciting life now, isn't it? Readem 02:34, 21 March 2007 (CDT)

At one point, I averaged 10+ hours a day just by taking my /age since GW started and dividing by the number of days. And I spend 3-5 hours on here. And I have school. --

Lol, don't even want to take an average. Readem 02:56, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

Your dervish running build and ranger running build are shit. You use 4 running skills that all do the same as one another.... no point really. I bet your ranger cant even run droks.
 * GW:NPA might be a good article to read about now. --[[image:rollerzerris.jpg|50x19px]]   17:25, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

Well, the builds on my page, are not really for the public... and I never said that the ranger can run droks, few rangers builds actually can... and btw, my Derv build can run droks. Readem 20:50, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

Archiving
If someone else hasn't told you, the best way to teach someone the archive system is to do a demonstration. So, let's say I wanted to create an archive for my user page (even though I wouldn't have any reason to do that). I would create a link that looked like User:Defiant Elements/Archive1. Then, I would save changes. This would cause a red link to appear like this one: User:Defiant Elements/Archive1. Then, you copy all the material on the current page and put it all in that link you just created. Finally, you deleted the material you copied and you have an archive. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 02:57, 23 March 2007 (CDT)

My Personal Builds
Might wanna put a

template just above that, so it doesn't get wiped out by your user boxes. --   00:05, 24 March 2007 (CDT)

Tyvm :D. Readem 17:37, 26 March 2007 (CDT)

User:Emissaries
GuildWiki is not a web hosting service for guilds to chat and have a central location. Try siteground. The account has been infinitely blocked and the main page protected. &mdash; Gares 15:01, 28 March 2007 (CDT)

m'kay Readem 16:02, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

Well, it appears I am a great deal of trouble :P lol
Hmm, not good. 70% of my comments are correcting me in some way or another -_-... such is life. Readem 22:49, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

User:Defiant Elements/Build Collaboration
In case you're interested. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 23:05, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

Reminder
Hey, you posted as a contestant in my build contest, but I haven't received a link for at least one of your builds and judging will begin sometime next month, so if I don't have your build(s) your build(s) won't be judged. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 00:31, 31 March 2007 (CDT)

Hmm, lets see if this works
&lt;font color=&quot;Black&quot;&gt;Readem&lt;/font&gt; &lt;small&gt;(&lt;font color=&quot;Red&quot;&gt;talk&lt;/font&gt;*&lt;font color=&quot;Black&quot;&gt;contribs&lt;/font&gt;) 00:18, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Readem (talk *contribs )

--&lt;font color=&quot;Black&quot;&gt;Readem&lt;/font&gt; &lt;small&gt;(&lt;font color=&quot;Red&quot;&gt;talk&lt;/font&gt;*&lt;font color=&quot;Black&quot;&gt;contribs&lt;/font&gt;) 00:21, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Readem (talk *Contribs 

&lt;font color=&quot;Black&quot;&gt;Readem&lt;/font&gt; &lt;small&gt;(&lt;font color=&quot;Red&quot;&gt;talk&lt;/font&gt;*&lt;font color=&quot;Black&quot;&gt;Contribs&lt;/font&gt; 00:34, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Final result: <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Red">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 01:08, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Build:W/A Critical Rage
You reasons are that this build does not inflict conditions and when the foe can walk away. Let me remind you that Shadowy burden serves as a snare, reduces armor by -20 and death's charge shadowsteps byside them. Why would you also need conditions when you hitting 100 criticals with a hammer on 60al targets. Something to think about, I would rather strike out your vote as you pointed up to suposed flaws of the build that inflict do not exist ; Thankyou. Solus  01:21, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

You are partially right, however see my new updated reasons. Also, you have no IAS, and you are using a hammer...why? <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Red">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 01:37, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

They hit very high DPS, hitting over 130 with critical hits. Also read variants and talk page. Use daggers for higher attack speed at the cost of lower damage. Solus  02:04, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Build:D/E Sanctum Cay Runner
You voted saying that Vos is better for runningthe mission. May I ask, have you ever ran/been run the mission Sanctum Cay? It involves tanking at the end of the mission, the run is easy and only needs a simple speed buff. If you going to unfavored builds give decent reasons or dont vote at all. Solus  01:55, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Just responded to that one too, and added reasons ;). <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Red">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 02:00, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Build:D/Me Fevered Thorns
Under your list of "Build's I Favor" may I ask why you unfavored my build (the title) yet you favored the Feverish Ranger. Aren't they very similar? Why say Fevered dreams isn't needed when infact you "favor" a build with the same concept using it? Solus  02:02, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Wow, this is becoming ridiculous. You see, The Feverish Ranger (Bow) is long ranged, synergizing well with Fevered. Also it only hits one target regularly, while yours are naturally AoE. The Feverish Ranger (Pet) is very similar to yours with one huge difference, you have no self heal and must go into the fray of battle, while the ranger sends a pet to do the same thing you do, without having to endanger himself. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Red">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 02:16, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

You do relise it's not a solo buil,d but designed for a balanced PVE team. Solus  18:57, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Everyone should have some sort of heal, even in a balanced team. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 19:00, 1 April 2007 (CDT)


 * Mystycism is your heal. Solus  [[Image:SOJsig.jpg|19px]] 21:07, 2 April 2007 (CDT)


 * Fine then, let me rephrase. "Needs more then very poor heal". <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 21:09, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

That why you have a balanced party. You don't consider 160 heatlh from Troll Uguent "poor heal". Dude PvE builds do not need self heal, that's the point of builds like this. Solus  21:35, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Well, thats your opinion. I personally believe, that if you accidently overextend you should be able to heal yourself. But thats just me I guess. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 21:42, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Sig
Ugh please change ur talk page thingy into another colour :P it is hurting my eyes =p=p --<font color=#2a7510>Sig <font color=#d8be01>mA   14:26, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Ok, if you want lol. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Red">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 14:44, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

This better: <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 14:45, 1 April 2007 (CDT)
 * WoW doesn't suck. graphics way better tho --[[User:Sigm@|<font color=#2a7510>Sig <font color=#d8be01>mA

]] 14:54, 1 April 2007 (CDT)


 * Oh, I am just following the WoW hating trend. I really don't give a damn what really goes on in WoW :D. Its like the Kurz vs Luxon thing, I may shout I hate their guts, but in reality I could care less. WoW does have bad graphics (In comparison to GW) and is run by Neo nazi's. That I will not deny. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 14:57, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

<font color="Red">♦♥<font color="Red">Read <font color="Black">em ♠♣

What about something like this? - Krowman (talk • contribs)  01:18, 4 April 2007 (CDT)


 * Hehe, you are probably the first one to get my name here...which is strange bcause it has no connection without the rest of it... :D <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 01:21, 4 April 2007 (CDT) (Btw, that sig looks awesome, but it may distract poor delicate Sigma :P lol)

Build Box
Think you've got enough builds there? <font color="DodgerBlue">Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 00:03, 2 April 2007 (CDT)


 * Hehehe, no. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 00:22, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

What, I only kept the builds that looked worthy... except for most of the Sin and Rit builds, I really don't know much for them. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 00:22, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

He,he,he
People get mad at me, just cause I hate repeating builds...wonder why. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 00:09, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Hey I actually have a good idea (No way :O)
What if I make an archive of every user box on the wiki... that would be sick lol. Well, better get started, anyone up for posting there favorite user boxes? <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 00:25, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
 * You better watch out, Blastedt has about 300 userboxes that just say: "this is another userbox." <font color="DodgerBlue">Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 00:27, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

I know, I originally wanted to join his camp... but I mean original User boxes. And I might limit it to only one per user's favorite. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 00:29, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

No fair, I have like 20 different original ones, how would I ever pick? :( (T/C) 00:36, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Well, I use the simple method of spin-in-cicle and point. But its really up to you ;). <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 00:40, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

But they're all so pretty. >.> Well, if we must pick a favorite one to save space, so be it. Here's my personal favorite one, though I'll probably regret picking it later.

Warning Zomg Warning!

Lolz! *strafes through exit* (T/C) 00:45, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Hmm, very nice. But can it compete w/ my intermediate Klingon box (Still in development)? :)

<font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 00:51, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

I can't decide... should I go with the Paranoia one or the "Vez iz mir" one? <font color="DodgerBlue">Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 00:48, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Vez seems very much like you Defiant. But its up to you *Shrug* <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 00:54, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Humm if I remember there is an actual box that says "This user does not speak Klingon", in Klingon. That pretty much pwns your box, thou I do like the colors. As to mine, it's an inside joke really, and I doubt anyone even knows the incident...oh well. (T/C) 01:00, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

You better show me that box *Pokes with a large stick* :D <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 01:01, 2 April 2007 (CDT)


 * I found it, and now feel the pain of Pwnage lol. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 01:13, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Hehe, these are mine, all mine :D. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 21:03, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

There must be some running joke going on that I'm not aware of. I've seen N/Es with Fireball, Signet of Sorrow and minions as well. Said their idea was brilliant because minions attack a foe, the AoE from FB kills them, then they get to use SoS. Yay! :-( - Krowman (talk • contribs)  21:44, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

omg your'e right
And if it hits 8 minions, tha'ts 32 pips of DEGEN!!! OMG --Narcism 22:16, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Hell yeah, I mean, whats better then that :P lol. <font color="Black">Readem (<font color="Black">talk *<font color="Black">contribs ) 22:20, 2 April 2007 (CDT) (Why only 8 minions, when you can hit 10, thats 36 pips O.o...)