Talk:Necromancer Monument armor

Finally a half-decent vanguard armor i was beginning to lose hope...i might just get this for my necro..Cardsharp 09:38, 2 September 2007 (CDT)
 * Is it just me or is the fem necro a reskined mesmer armor? and the male necro is pretty obviose... looks nice though. 24.168.227.165 21:12, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

...i think you might be right about the female armor...o.O71.222.37.117 22:47, 3 September 2007 (CDT)

Nope, it's reskin of other necro armors. Top is Krytan, legs are Fanatic, gloves are something close to Elite Sunspear, and boots are slightly changed from Cabal. Nothing Mesmery here... RoseOfKali 03:30, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

And yes, this is the only EOTN Necro armor I wanna get, the others are nothing short of pathetic. RoseOfKali 03:30, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
 * I'd say Dervish, Paragon, Ritualist, and Necromancer all look good. But i've seen Wars with monument armor dyed a certain way that looks good--Darksyde Never Again 13:18, 7 September 2007 (CDT)
 * well....i suppose this is the least lame necro armor, i might get my necro this...Cardsharp 01:17, 8 September 2007 (CDT)

Dye
The Female one dyed white looks yellow, and the Male one dyed black looks red... Is there some sort of dye misalignment here similar to the Chaos Axe? Though, the Chaos Axe responds normally to monochromatic dyes, it's the polys that come out funky. Has anyone tried other colors on this? RoseOfKali 01:46, 11 September 2007 (CDT)


 * LOL! i was thinkin the same thing... i was like... "white only looks like that when im on LSD"... but now i know im not alone ^^--Schlumpy 21:29, 19 September 2007 (CDT)

Male necro
The male necro pics were edited without the users permission. Overly brightened they now show a false colour of the armour, making it look a horrible grey. Edit: Same with female necro pics now

GW:IMAGE says:

Notes
 * When you upload your screen captures to GuildWiki, any one may modify this image. If it is felt that your image of that sword focuses more on your Elementalist who is holding it than on the sword itself, others may crop and re-upload the picture or simply upload a new picture of the item.

(T/C) 02:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I do agree that the male gallery is overly bright, which may be due to post-process effects being on while taking the shots. It definitely needs to be redone, if possible.  Right now it looks kind of "washed out." RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 21:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Whoah... Scratch the post-process... Someone just took the old pics and cranked up the brighness on them. No wonder I thought it looks really bizarre and rather awful. Definitely needs to be redone, since the old pics were way too dark, and the new ones are way too bright. RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 21:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Bug
The Hands & Legs Back image is new uploaded but still shows the old one. If you click on it it shows the New one but still is this going to change? :P --   † The Falling One©  14:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It's Wikia - their image caching servers can't keep up with us. :P Wait a few minutes and it should be fine.  If it doesn't update after a few hours, though, then there might be a problem.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 16:47, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * yup it's there :D -- [[Image:F4Sig.jpg|20px]]  † The Falling One©  16:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Did I do it right btw? I mean the images? Good sun? Good place? Good angel? -- [[Image:F4Sig.jpg|20px]]  † The Falling One©  19:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * They look great. The only problem I see (and didn't think about it until now) is that you should set the camera up to the shoulders, not the face.  Check this gallery to see what I mean - you get more direct views of the front and back that way.  It would be nice if you could redo them like that, although these are acceptable (and a lot better than the previous ones).  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 19:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)