User:Mendel/Talk Archive 6

I reserve the right to edit section titles to coincide with the section content. =Comments=

RfA
The RfA was placed by Shadowphoenix on 18:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC). --◄mendel► 05:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi stinky [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 05:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Correct naming
Looking at Aggressive Hippopotamus, I was thinking of making a Hard mode only category, but I don't know if there are any other monsters that would fit the bill, or how to name the category, can you shed some light on either? If you don't know of any other monsters, then it's irrelevant, because there's no need for a cat for just one critter. &mdash; Powersurge360 Violencia  08:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't know of any, but then I don't know much. I'd put a note on the hard mode article (Monsters section?), may "The AH only appears in Hard mode". Can you confirm that the agressive hippo has the same skin as the defnct pygmy hippo? If not, could you please upload a current screenshot? Thank you for your support on the RfA. --◄mendel► 08:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 'll do it tomorrow, as I doubt it is the same, as the pygmy was causing "problems". &mdash; Powersurge360 Violencia  08:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It is, in fact, the exact same model. See this link. Unable of finding the exact page where she said it, though. I really wonder why there were problems with a tameable version but not with a monster version. Hug Wub Banana 16:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * They fixed the graphical bugs it caused. The shoulders would rocket up into the skies when attacking or something weird like that. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]]-- (s)talkpage  16:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the reason they didn't let people charm them as pets was something like, the skeleton it uses is unique, unlike other pets which share models (Dune Lizard, Iguana, Crocodile; Melandru's Stalker, Lynx, Lion, etc.) Apparently the skeleton was too complex, and would cause additional loading time. Why this is a problem, who knows. I could be wrong, that's just what I saw on a few talk pages on GWW.
 * lol, after typing all that I clicked on Hug Wub's link and saw someone said the exact same thing -_- --Macros 18:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Iron Arch
Have you ever been in Sorrow's Furnace? Iron Arch is not a real location, in fact, it's only spoken about between players, and perhaps in a dialogue or so. It's not on the map or anything akin. --- -- (s)talkpage  19:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * No, I haven't. It's not clear from the article. Could you reword it to say that this is a fictional location, and cat it for Lore? --◄mendel► 20:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Link you wanted (Podax Vandal)
Random Time  20:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, ty. 2 weeks would've been ok. That means I still disagree with Warwick, though. --◄mendel► 21:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Vipermagi#preaching to the
I read the wrong end of my watchlist first, then ran out of time when it came to replying to this one, and now I'm more than a day late in replying. The most important thing to write is that I notice people trying to be more kind to strangers, including you, Viper, and that I really appreciate your support both in getting my admin notices attedned to as in fixing my mistakes and pointing out some of my other errors. It really helps knowing to have someone dedicated checking your work. Whatever you may feel you are in RL, here in the wikisphere you are doing fine, and I'm sure if you manage to extend any of that into your RL (as you likely have already), you'll be doing fine there as well, and eventually manage to convince yourself that you do (sometimes that's the hard part).

The other comment is the one about the banning. Not sure if the second admonishment was worth it - it was a judgment call, and yours to make, and it did get the vandal to stop, so I guess it was. So what end did the ban achieve? Wikipedia admins seem (from what I read) have come to the conclusion that punitive bans make no sense. If you ban, you ought to have an end beyond punishing, like getting vandalism to stop or to get NPA violators to cool off. I've raised this issue before on the admin noticeboard, and it is a big issue that alienates me from this community - I've felt some progress because some people seem to care more about being satisfied with simpler solutions that don't involve the ban stick, but if Entropy is actively opposed to that, it'll stop.

The other things that alienate me are a total lack of standardization as regard the databasey stuff (but that's just a lot of work and effort to set right) and of course the wikia hash of laggy, ad- and bug-riddled presentation of our hard work. So despite the good experiences I've had on the wiki, including the fun getting to know some of its citizens, and learning a lot very quickly, I am still insecure about whether it is wise for me to continue my involvement at this level.

I'm trying to not come across as threatening to leave the wiki (and I won't respond to anyone who takes it as such) - you were doing fine two months ago before I came along, and that'll continue to be the case even if I go away again, so there's not much of a threat to be made anyway. I wanted to air these feelings thogh, for whatever that was worth. Now my watchlist awaits. --◄mendel► 22:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I shouldn't do admin stuff when I am tired. That's all I will say on that particular occasion.
 * A ban is a tool and it can be good or bad in any situation depending on how you use it...I think the important thing is that you do use it when needed, not as a sort of "you have left me no choice" measure. In other words it is not so great and terrible a thing that it should be avoided whenever possible. It's great if you can manage to stop a vandal without a ban; it's really awesome when you can turn an anon into a regular user. User:Lost-Blue and User:Mr Ex Vandal are two cases you may want to look at. Finally, "some people seem to care more about being satisfied with simpler solutions that don't involve the ban stick, but if Entropy is actively opposed to that, it'll stop." Please don't demonize me more than I deserve... [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 07:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Don't vandalize me 07:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I did? --◄mendel► 07:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 07:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Get your attributions right next time and I won't do it again. --◄mendel► 08:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * ur fat [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 08:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * no u --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]]-- (s)talkpage  08:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

rfa/irc
Have you been on irc today? Auron wants to know whether you officially accepted/rejected your nomination (it's the topic in irc atm.) --Shadowcrest  22:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I am a little puzzled why you would ask me this here when he could have done the same. --◄mendel► 08:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I am a little puzzled why you won't answer the question, clearly Auron isn't able to get on the wiki. Hug Wub Banana 10:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Huh? Why not? Random Time  10:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I am a little puzzled why mendel would be under any obligation to accept or reject the nomination anyway. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 12:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Hug Wub, I am little puzzled because I have answered Shadowcrest and Auron, too.
 * And clearly Auron's throttled to 2 GuildWiki edits per day on weekdays.--◄mendel► 12:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops. Sorry, I didn't check this page after you posted here - I was thinking it'd be better to answer here, so yeah. My bad! Hug Wub Banana 14:03, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * He wasn't on when I asked you. I asked of my own free will. --Shadowcrest 16:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, own free will and all that, what struck me as odd is that your question was "Have you been on irc today?" and not about the RfA. Anyway, I forgot to thank you for the heads up, anyway, so thank you. --◄mendel► 18:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It was an inquiry as to whether you had seen the topic, which pertained to your non/acceptance of your RfA. --Shadowcrest 18:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I understand that. I suspected you of ulterior motives beyond being friendly and telling me it's there. I shouldn't have. --◄mendel► 18:49, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Then that would explain why I sensed your message as a bit more hostile than it should have been. We'll call it even. --Shadowcrest  18:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Skills used/Items dropped
S&F has the second word not capitalized. Many users have been changing it to fix this, such as here. I won't revert it because of GW:1RV, though. Cress Arvein 23:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, the bestiary S&F needs to be corrected. GW:ULC mandates standard English, and as far as I can tell, title caps for subheadings is that (source in GuildWiki talk:Use lower case. Anyway, fixing this is relatively minor; if you were to go at it, you'd have to change more than 1000 articles either way, and maybe we should decide whether this is a level 2 or level 3 heading before we did that because that varies as well. Or leave everything as it is. --◄mendel► 00:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * ( Might want to move/copy this discussion to ULC talk eventually... Never mind, I really should read all the way through RC before commenting anywhere.) I'm going to say we follow Wikipedia on section headings - Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters), which says to only capitalize proper nouns.  This follows rules for articles in scientific journals (I published a couple in grad school), where section headings within an article, like "Experimental setup" only have the first word capitalized.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 01:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Interrupting your regular logical discussions with the following:
That is all.--ìğá†ħŕášħ 11:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ooooh nice! A care-lion! Thank you! --◄mendel► 11:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

galleries
what are you thoughts on implementing this and how to go about it? what is this "SMW" you refered to? &mdash;♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 18:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_MediaWiki
 * Semantic Media Wiki
 * I think we can do without, though - DPL (Dynamic Page Lists) is probably enough.
 * Have I already complained that the mediawiki search engine does not index 3-letter-words? --◄mendel► 18:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)