Talk:Eye of the North/Archive

(New page: ) :p &mdash; Skuld 14:32, 6 March 2007 (CST)


 * Why delete it though? We kept the Nightfall article when we confirmed the domain name registration? Has anyone checked this Inquirer site? --Karlos 14:38, 6 March 2007 (CST)


 * There's really not much we can knowingly say about it other than the domain name is registered and that it's speculated to be the name of the next Guild Wars campaign or expansion.
 * All we really know is that NCsoft has registered the domain name "eyeofthenorth.org". But, nothing official clarifies if that's related to Guild Wars or some other NCsoft franchise.  And due to Gaile's comments "some of what you've read is right, some of it is wrong, and quite a bit of it is misleading" posted here and here, none of the content or future plans mentioned in the tech tabloid's story can be viewed as reliable. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 14:45, 6 March 2007 (CST)
 * I'm out of whether it should be here or not, just pointing out that a new page was created with a deletion tag :p &mdash; Skuld 15:59, 7 March 2007 (CST)

You can delete it later anyway. Who cares? 132.203.83.38 21:42, 6 March 2007 (CST)


 * The earlier versions contained specific information that was clearly in question. I should've purged the excess data down to only the statement of what is known.
 * I have no objection to the current version of the article, as it avoids the fluff while stating the supported facts. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:37, 7 March 2007 (CST)

We should bring it back and get started. Arena NET and NCSoft have just confirmed The Eye of the North as being the last expansion for GuildWars. Yes people GuildWars 2 is coming. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.112.28.138 (talk &bull; contribs) 07:54, March 9, 2007 (CST).
 * Link? Nothing in their news or press releases yet. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 10:09, 9 March 2007 (CST)
 * Actually, even then he is wrong. GW:EotN is rumored to be an expansion. . .not GW 2. --SBR 10:19, 9 March 2007 (CST)
 * The name of the fourth expansion was taken from GDC 2007 unofficial informantion from NCSOFT. The authorities of the company don't want to coment because is just the truth. There is no false information. Maybe mislediang or information of GW 2 was mixed with GW:EN. - The King Arthur 12:06, 10 March 2007 (CST)

Guild Wars (2) Eye of the North, G.W.E.N, playable races, END of GW1 (Proh., Fact., NF). PLAYABLE RACES!!! NEW LVL. CAP!!!. With the release in 2009-2010, A-Net should get the brand spanking new features we want, like bigger storage and better PvE method of exploring the breath taking graphics, like being able to jump (not /jump, but on the keyboard to help interact with the PvE enviroment, also swim would be nice. I just hope we don't we have to wait this long for the GW2 series. I want the BETA NOW (Which would most likely be next year)!!! - EnterNameHere RIPRIP

*Here's the site ,ssdfaer<str<str sry guys i just restated what was list above... My guild was trying to convince me that this was real, and as naive and young as i am compared to you guys in Age and Experience, I just had to post it -_-(also I was half asleep) EnterNameHere RIPRIP
 * This has already been discussed in great length (you provided a link to a copy of the original, I didn't cross check to make sure it hadn't been altered from the original form). Worse though, you're mistating much of the article, of which ArenaNet has said some is right, some is wrong, and some is misleading.  See this link for ArenaNet's comments on that article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:46, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

Trademark info
See Talk:Campaign_Four for information on this entry to the article. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 10:46, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

Argument for merge
There is nothing in this article that's not already stated in the Campaign 4 article. I think this one can be made a redirect to there for now. Once we have official confirmation of the name (possibly as soon as this week) we can then just Move Campaign 4 to rename it as "Guild Wars Eye of the North". --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 10:13, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Full support by me. Never saw the use of this anyway.--Nog64Talk [[Image:Word_of_Healing.jpg|19px]] 17:57, 14 March 2007 (CDT)

It isn't a campaign though is it, iirc they said it was just an expansion &mdash; Skuld 05:34, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
 * ArenaNet hasn't yet said anything on it - campaign, expansion, or figment of imagination. That's also part of reason to merge.  --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 10:06, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

I would suggest waiting a day or so. Once we know, we can merge if they're one and the same. If they're not, maybe it's another project in the works. -- Dashface  05:19, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
 * I agree. Who's to say that this is Campaign Four? It might be an expansion that will be coming before or after Campaign Four even. Just got to wait for PC Gamer to finally ship. Alreajk 20:26, 17 March 2007 (CDT)

Remove merge. It isnt campaign. --SBR 19:29, 20 March 2007 (CDT)


 * Yes it is, it's just not a standalone campaign. I think this article should be temporarily turned into a redirect to Guild Wars Eye of the North until we find out what the Eye is, at which point we can turn it into an article on the Eye itself. -- Gordon Ecker 20:28, 20 March 2007 (CDT)


 * Maybe the Eye is a Red Iris Flower. -- Dashface [[Image:Dashface.png]] 22:37, 22 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Yeah, maybe...... Anyways, agree with the redirect idea, for the same reasons as Gord's. - [[Image:Candle.jpg|12px]] Krowman (talk • contribs) 22:45, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

ironic?
if you destroy the great destroyer arent you an even bigger destroyer then?
 * Yep. The Hobo 14:54, 24 July 2007 (CDT)