User talk:Aludeni/Schedule1

Compact Schedule1
I like the "next" term, and the compactness in general, but still the breaks where "tomorrow" was under instead of the same line were easier on the eyes. I would prefer the breaks but I do like term next and the small changes in terms to shorten them as well (i.e. Traveler and Sanford etc.) p.s. I dorked up and missed a few daily's after the time change, and finally decided to try to figure out what was going on there lol.--ShmEk 15:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Also forgot to say, the split line for "next" under combat - really liked that forecast on only one single line as it was previously. That was the first thing that struck me as a definite weirdness that I didn't like, and I even went and copied the old page before I saw your comment about thoughts on the new look.--ShmEk 15:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I decided on next, because well tomorrow is always a day a way and even when it becomes that day for like say me and some others, before the changes and people "check" on that. I thought what better than the word "next" to replace that. Just was and am aiming for a "style" that'd fit well on the main page and not be so "scrolling" even if by a line, I'd rather reduce and show a better one than the current that I had put on the editcopy. --Ariyen 16:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Ya, I like the "next" for sure. I just noticed you reduced the flux icon to 25 too.  GJ!!!  Funny, on the page I am working on User:ShmEk/shedule I had put it to 26 too and wasn't sure of how the odd number would effect it so I went with the 26 instead of 25 lol.  I do like your "schedule" page too, which is most informative, but for some reason I still like the style of this page better, and thanks to you have just stolen your code earlier and been modifying it to add a few more extra days.  I'll probably cut "tomorrow" for "next" also and then use the pipes for following days if you care to look at the page.  Thanks so much for the inspiration!  You have been wonderful help, and fun to talk to too.--ShmEk 16:34, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I do like the style of this page, but the other I use for "colorfulness" for my userspace. I didn't want it to be a "repeat" of any wiki mainpage and this idea came from one on gww, whom had the colors reversed. I didn't like that, because I couldn't read all that well of what the current stuff was. However, I felt that the way I "have" it is actually a bit better to read. X-) Ariyen 16:39, 31 March 2012 (UTC)