Talk:Über Micro Skillz

Stop. We don't do titles this way. Creating these redirects is just a waste of space. Entropy 20:57, 28 December 2006 (CST)
 * We haven't done this in the past, but in the author's defense, I don't see anything in GW:REDIRECT that prevents this use either - it may even help for someone using the "Search" box to try finding it by the title. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:01, 28 December 2006 (CST)
 * Yes, but in the past we just deleted these kinds of redirects. :S Forexample one redirect was for "Healing Sig" -> Healing Signet, got deleted in 3 minutes after I make comment like the one above. Entropy 21:04, 28 December 2006 (CST)
 * When I deleted that one, I used the logic that "Healing Sig" was an intentional misspelling - which are also not specifically called out in the policy. But, for correct spelling, we do have things like Miner's Key and Miner's Chest that redirect, so I see no problem with the titles doing the same. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:08, 28 December 2006 (CST)
 * Do we put up Redirects for every other stage of every other title? Entropy 21:11, 28 December 2006 (CST)
 * We haven't thus far - but the keys and chests are a good precedent for other types of articles, and nothing in GW:REDIRECT excludes doing it. Between those two things, it seems reasonable to keep.  The redirect records are so small that their disk usage in the database is very minor, especially compared to other things that we do allow that serve no useful purpose (userboxes for example). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 21:17, 28 December 2006 (CST)
 * I guess it's irrelevant Barek, Korolan is doing all the work for us. :S Entropy 21:48, 28 December 2006 (CST)