Talk:Stone Daggers

how well does the dps on this stack up vs flare? irealise it probably will be less as the dmg is in 2 packets thus ignores certain skills88.106.131.8 11:50, 8 January 2007 (CST)
 * The dps vs the other spammable ele spells (flare, ice spear) are about on par, only real difference positive or negative comes vs what spells you might face. as the notes section indicates, this spell benefits vs reversal of fortune or damage, as well as vs prot spirit (it slips under the 10% of hp most of the time).  but it does not fare so well vs shield of absorption, mantra of earth, union, healing hands, etc that get benefits per hit.  against an undefended foe, i would guess the dps from flare and stone daggers to be about equal. &mdash;[[Image:Damnreds.png]] 12:07, 8 January 2007 (CST)
 * Stone Daggers results in more damage packets per second but approximately equal total damage per second - higher frequency, lower amplitude. If they were graphed Damage vs Second, Stone Daggers would be nearly a straight line, while Flare would be more jagged up-and-down due to more time between damage packets. Therefore Stone Daggers is a lot like Health Degeneration whereas Flare is closer to a series of small damage spikes. This is even more true of Ice Spear, which has a higher dps than either spell but has the half-ranged drawback. In any case, Reds is right, the best spell is chosen by what buffs the target may have. Although Flare and Ice Spear both have more "utility" uses than Stone Daggers (Mark of Rodgort, Spinal Shivers, etc). Entropy 00:53, 24 January 2007 (CST)

At 16 Earth Magic with the recent buff, this does 70 damage. With 16 Water Magic, Ice Spear does 74 damage and has half range. Somehow, this seems better. . . --Son of Urza 12:40, 3 February 2007 (CST)
 * Shielding Hands --Kiiron 19:29, 15 February 2007 (CST)