Template talk:User unlocked runes

Not working in Firefox
I like the look of this template but it doesn't render the "yes" blocks for me. I'm using Portable Firefox 1.5.0.7 - any ideas what's up? --NieA7 07:23, 16 November 2006 (CST)

Anybody? Onto Portable 2.0 now...
 * It's been broken for a while on both IE and FF, I'm not sure what's wrong with it. I didn't make it.  &mdash; [[Image:Fin_sig.gif|User:Kyrasantae]] kyrasantae   18:56, 17 December 2006 (CST)
 * Really? Looks OK in IE 6.0 to me (on Dashface's user page). --NieA7 04:03, 18 December 2006 (CST)
 * Oh yeah, hey it does work on Dashface's page (in IE, I mean). That's interesting. But I don't know any code, or I'd try to fix it. &mdash; [[Image:Fin_sig.gif|User:Kyrasantae]] kyrasantae   05:18, 18 December 2006 (CST)
 * Yeah, the template here is empty by design, so nothing'd show up even if it was working. I don't know enough to see where it's going wrong, unfortunately... --NieA7 06:06, 18 December 2006 (CST)
 * Yes, the template is empty by design, but there's no reason it couldn't have some noinclude instructions down the bottom. At the moment, the blank boxes are black and I doubt that word values would override the colours, but it's now better than it was as far as Firefox compatibility. -- Dashface [[Image:Dashface.png]] 07:43, 18 December 2006 (CST)
 * Looks beautiful now, renders just as it should. Any objections if I nick it for my page (which I really need to re-do)? --NieA7 09:11, 18 December 2006 (CST)
 * The blank spaces turn out black in IE7, but at least Firefox likes it now. This template is not in my user space, because I created it with the idea that others could use it freely. Even if it was in my user space, I still don't see how I could have any objections. After all, "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." -- Dashface [[Image:Dashface.png]] 07:33, 20 December 2006 (CST)