Template talk:User-created image

Why is there no parameter field for "Source"? I assume that "Image Uploader" a.k.a. Author would always be the person who uploads the image, not necessarily the original author of the material. And since the User-Created Image license applies to any "user" who has created something and released it from copyright/license/etc, it therefore doesn't make sense that "Source" should automagically be "Own Work". (T/C) 03:15, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
 * The author is the person that created the work, the source is "Own work" because it can not be linked to a website or resource because it does not exist. The author can be customized to allow someone that isnt the original uploader to link to the true person. -- Xeon 03:24, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
 * Oh, okay...so shouldn't there be a parameter for uploader, in the case of an image that gets re-uploaded for a different purpose, etc.? [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 03:26, 4 May 2007 (CDT)
 * No, the uploader does not need to be recorded (its already recorded in the wiki log at the bottom anyway) for license issues, the original author needs to be only. If the image is duplicated, the license does not change and it must be copied over. If its an image from somewhere else and you modified it, i think you need to say you modified the image and link back to the original image, which is why im putting user notes in soon, i didnt get around to putting it on the sub templates last night. Do not quote me on this, i am not totally sure on the limits for modification of original images and licenses, i do not know the rules in total for this. -- Xeon 03:35, 4 May 2007 (CDT)