Talk:Game updates/20060705

Is it policy to change the text from the website (slightly) to conform to a standard we use, rather than copying it verbatim? I'm not asserting that it should be either way, I just thought we stuck to quoting the website pretty directly (rather than changing things like "OTHER UPDATES" to "Guildwiki Notes", especially when they are clearly ANet's notes, not ours). --JoDiamonds 22:09, 5 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Nevermind, I see it's already been fixed. --JoDiamonds 22:10, 5 July 2006 (CDT)

What's the point of the note? It's like saying "All merchants on Shing Jea Island, not jsut Shing Jea Monastery..." which to me seem pointless. -
 * I was wondering the same. --[[Image:TurningL sml.gif|Tetris L]] 23:12, 5 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Update notes say Kaineng Center... All the merchants in Kaineng City offer the new stuff, not just in Kaineng Center. I checked Imperial Sanctum, Nahpui and Maatu. --Karlos 00:35, 6 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Kaineng City is much, much larger than merely Kaineng Center (in mostly the same way that Shinh Jea Island is many towns, missions, and outposts, rather than just one of those). I certainly agree the note should be there.  --JoDiamonds 07:30, 6 July 2006 (CDT)
 * The original issue was that the actual game update text in the GuildWiki article also said Kaineng City (instead of Kaineng Center), rendering the note redundent. Now that it has been fixed, the note makes sense. - 07:42, 6 July 2006 (CDT)

And no word on the banning glich? :| Foo 01:36, 6 July 2006 (CDT)


 * About the glitch, I'd check Gurus as last night they did have it featured on their news page. I'm limited to this site while at the office, so that's the best I can tell you. -Gares 07:39, 6 July 2006 (CDT)