Talk:Levels of drunkenness

Shouldn't this be in drunk? --68.142.14.34 20:54, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
 * I believe Kai Neah Nung created this with the intention of it being included in articles. If you look at what links to the article, you'll see it's an include in Dwarven Ale, Hunter's Ale and Bottle of Rice Wine. Or did you mean it should be included in Drunk in addition to the other articles? If so good pickup and I've gone ahead and made the change just then, thanks. --Xasxas256 20:59, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
 * I suppose my suggestion was a little brief. Rather than anywhere else, I think should should be in drunk.  If someone is looking at a drink's item article, they can click a link to drunk to learn about the effects of drinking.  I don't think the information should be anywhere else.  (Also, as I've noted in the past, being imminently lazy, I prefer making suggestions to carrying them out.)  --68.142.14.34 21:57, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
 * You could be right and it's also inconsistant to include the article in Dwarven Ale, Hunter's Ale and Bottle of Rice Wine but not Eggnog, Spiked Eggnog and Absinthe. I'd say I agree the table should just be in drunk but then having this article is irrelevent. Well this table has to be in all 6 articles or none at all so I'm going to remove it from the three it's currently in and I'll add a merge tag (merge with drunk) and put a note on Kai Neah Nung's talk page, if Kai wants to use it in other articles they can leave a note saying so. --Xasxas256 22:06, 4 July 2006 (CDT)
 * It is ment to be included in any article you like. I did not include it in an other than the Ales, as I didn't test it with the other ones. So feel free to do so :) ---Kai Neah Nung

Ummm... are there FIVE or six levels?
I though you drink 5 to start... wait 3 minutes then drink 3 more. Since when can you drink SIX and have the sixth have any effects (besides pissing away your ales/money)? Is the addition of a sixth level correct (if it is, can someone explain why it is correct?) or is this an error? Thanks   Frostty1 05:46, 23 November 2006 (CST)
 * It isn't correct... reverting --Kai Neah Nung 13:52, 23 November 2006 (CST)