GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/HarshLanguage

HarshLanguage (talk &bull; contribs)
This user, though only having a contribution history of three months, has shown incredible aplomb in ensuring the wiki continues to work while simultaneously questioning the assumptions and policies we've made to facilitate it. Care like this is rare, and is an asset I'd like to see on my administrative team.

Because this user is in good standing, I retain my right to appoint him without community consensus. &mdash;Tanaric 21:40, 28 March 2007 (CDT)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

 * 1) I think HL would be a fine addition.  Queen Schmuck 21:50, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) Strong Support Assuming HL accepts the nomination, this is one nomination that I wholeheartedly support. Defiant Elements  (talk ~ contribs) 23:17, 28 March 2007 (CDT)

Oppose

 * 1) (your vote here)

Neutral

 * 1) Not incredibly impressed with ideals, but HL is a very motivated person. If his personal goals were closer to something that would aid the Wiki, I'd support. Till then, with the power that Admins have, I'm not comfortable with HL having admin tools and sway. However, since this is mostly just a difference of opinion, it isn't fair for me to oppose his adminship. -Auron [[Image:Elit Druin.jpg|19px||My Talk]] 00:10, 29 March 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) I like his edits, and he is a good contributor, but he still has a rather short history on guildwiki so that makes me worry. His questioning of policy and making contructive arguments is also nice but then again, it is still a rather short history.  For me I think it is just plain too early. --Lania Elderfire[[Image:Pinkribbonsig.gif|My Talk]] 02:12, 29 March 2007 (CDT)