GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Warwick (6)

=== Warwick (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count &bull; RFA page) ===

God, I have had way too damn many nominations. Lots of people probably thought I'd given up on the whole rfa front, but the ironic thing is its a tiny little thing that made me think about rfaing again - The fact I couldn't edit Entropy's page to vote in her poll. :P. The rationale of my nomination is this: I'm better than I was before, and I don't do much trolling anymore. I think I'm quite a lot more mature, wiki-wise than I was before. I doubt I'd abuse admin powers, because it'd be a fairly stupid thing to do. Surefire way to get kicked out of them, much? I also feel that I know what's involved in adminship. Sure, I seem to be relatively inactive, but I'm nearly always in IRC idling, on my gwiki msn, ingame, and I refresh RC every time I check, and I'm almost always there for a chat on my talkpage. If there's any vandalism going on, I revert it. I don't normally tag things for deletion/banning anymore, because I know that Viper will get round to it regardless. Adminship would probably increase my activity by quite a lot. I've pissed a lot of people off, and several people probably don't think that I deserve a chance, but I think I do. Plus, now if I'm a terrible admin, Entropy/Auron/Jedi can just demote me outright, without waiting for Wikia to respond. I've never been a believer in "If you screw up it can be fixed", its just that that's a bonus of the fact. That's pretty much all I have to say. &mdash; Warw/Wick 15:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Mkay, edit for the rationale for why I should be an admin, as opposed to why its okay. I feel, as I always have, that I could use admin tools well. As well as that, it'd probably increase my activity by quite a lot. I can't really think of many reasons why I should, to be truthful, though I can think of quite a few as to why its okay. Gwiki doesn't need more admins, but Entropy herself said "You can never have too many admins".. At least, I think it was Entropy. :P. Thats about it all. Oh, and I see quite a few things that could do with deleting that other people (Mainly Viper tbh) don't get to deleting for about 20-40 mins or so. But I'm not really certain if that's an actual reason. So meh. That's just a response to Pan's comment, really. &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 18:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Yes. Yes I do accept. -_- &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 15:31, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

''Please summarize the candidate's qualifications below. Elaboration on a post, counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the talkpage.''

Supporting qualities

 * Longevity / Experience of various forms
 * Adminship would increase activity (According to candidate)
 * Generally considered "Trustworthy" (According to candidate)
 * (list supporting qualities here)

Opposing qualities

 * Rocky history (Tendency to make quick decisions without community discussion leading to brash actions that are widely opposed by the community.)
 * (list opposing qualities here)

Neutral/Double-edged qualities

 * A tendency to (tag) delete first and ask questions never
 * (list neutral qualities here)