Talk:Chat command

The /bug command doesn't work anymore. Verified by Gaile Gray. --Gem  02:00, 18 April 2006 (CDT)

Has anybody successfully used the /resign command? Every time my party and I have tried it, it didn't work. --Jamison 18:13, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
 * I'll try it tomorrow. --Gem [[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] 18:20, 5 May 2006 (CDT)


 * My guildies and I have tried using the /resign command a couple of times and have come to the conclusion that it's still simpler to just map back to town. It hasn't worked for us once.--Xis10al 18:36, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
 * I believe it doesn't work if you have henchmen in your party. | 19:30, 5 May 2006 (CDT)
 * Poor design then. Lets all send bug reports to Anet. --Gem [[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] 02:23, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * I would, but I'm already complaining about the 0-hp bug where some things looke like they have no life. It's become a serious issue now that I can't see how much HP my spirits have somtimes! | 08:40, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * The 0hp bug has become more common. I see them every day now, where I saw them only rarely before. --Gem [[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] 13:56, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * http://support.guildwars.com/ &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 14:07, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * What I ment by complain is that I've already submitted a report about it. Hopefully they will take it seriously. 14:56, 6 May 2006 (CDT)
 * I can confim that /resign does not work, even with a full group of human players. The message comes up saying, "[name] has resigned.", but even after all members have done so, nothing happens. --Jomdom 20:19, 10 May 2006 (CDT)
 * I was under the impression that this was a PvP only command, not usable in PvE. I do remember vaguely seeing guilds using it from Obs mode, and it worked for them. Maybe someone can try this with a scrimmage? --Dirigible 19:41, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
 * It used to work, I have resigned from a GvG in the past. This is of course because my guild holds me back! :P --Xasxas256 19:46, 8 June 2006 (CDT)

Article name change?
The move tag has been on the page since April, with no talk on it thus far. I believe that the current Commands article name should be used. A precedent for this would the use of the Builds article name instead of Build. --- Barek (talk &bull; contribs) - 17:50, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Well we also have Emotes with an "s" at the end. I don't know if just two people agreeing means that the move tag should be removed particularly when nobody has responded to the discussion yet but anyway. I guess for consistency I'd prefer this to change to Command. Look at say Rank has no "s" despite there being different ranks and Minion, Rune, Item, Skill but there's still some examples of articles in the plural form like Locations. I don't think that virtually any article should be in the plural form (ie with an "s"). My 2 cents. --Xasxas256 19:37, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
 * I hadn't realized the move tag was already removed. I'm guessing because there had been nearly two months with no discussion either way.  To me, our 'move' tag policy probably should have an expiration. after a certain amount of time, it's safe to remove it if no one cared enough to discuss it.  As a discussion is started here now, if anyone feels strongly on this, feel free to add it back on.
 * But, that's off topic. I agree, there's examples going both ways.  For in-game items, we routinely use the singular.  But for wiki-specific collections of entries, I can easilly argue that plural is appropriate.  Still, like I said in Category talk:Articles to be moved, I honestly don't feel strongly either way on this.  I just wanted to get a discussion moving so we could clean up another 'move' tag once we have a concensus. --- Barek (talk &bull; contribs) - 20:09, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
 * The move tag was removed by JoDiamonds in between your first comment and my reply. Yeah I really just want some sort of standard, if the rule is: in game term=singular and GuildWiki specific term=plural (provided multiples of said thing is possible) that's fine by me. You can't remember this being decided upon or discussed previously can you? --Xasxas256 20:14, 8 June 2006 (CDT)


 * The standard is related to "ingame labels" and "command" is not an ingame label. In such a case, it's really a choice between which word best represents what we are talking about, just like "User Interface" vs "Screen" vs "HUD." So, the debate should be one of "Which expression describes this feature most closely and intuitively?" I am fine with commands over command, but there is really little difference. --Karlos 23:00, 8 June 2006 (CDT)