Category talk:Minion Master builds

Why it was Created
I added this page as an attempt to tidy up the general Minion Mastery guide. As of now there are no approved Necromancer MM builds and therefore nothing to link to from the article (I removed the builds in it as they were out of date) - this category was designed to be a stop-gap solution until some MM builds are approved and can be linked to directly. In the mean time it is a simple way to collect all the MM builds in one place. I've got no problems with it being deleted then, however until that time I think it is needed.

I was going to add the MM category to other MM builds over the next few days, hence the initially small number of builds in this category. --NieA7 17:38, 17 July 2006 (CDT)
 * I'm against the idea of temporary measures that are not needed. Builds that have not been fully tested/approved by the community can already be found in Category:Untested builds and Category:Build stubs.  Once approved, they'll be contained in Category:Untested builds.  A MM specific category creates unneeded overlap. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 08:41, 18 July 2006 (CDT)


 * There are no approved Necromancer MM builds as of now. Linking to unapproved builds in a guide is not a good idea. Considering that including builds in the article itself is also a bad idea (they are effectively unapproved and prone to becoming out of date), what would you suggest we link to in the guide if we don't use a temporary category? --NieA7 08:49, 18 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Linking to a category that contains un-approved builds is no better than linking to the unnapproved builds themselves. Also, this could set a precedent of cluttering the wiki with these types of categories for other guides, not a good solution.
 * Either press for approval on at least one build, or simply link to the Builds article for now. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 08:53, 18 July 2006 (CDT)


 * It's better inasmuch as linking to a specific build gives it implicit approval - it's the equivilent of giving somebody a plumber's name when they ask for a recommendation, rather than pointing them towards a phone book. I don't think it would be clutter if it were only a temporary measure, although I can why other would think that it would be. I am aware of only two guides that include specific builds (MM and Trapper): even if there are more this is a specific response to a specific problem, I don't see why it would set anything other than a very limited precedent.
 * I'll link to the builds page as a whole for now. I'm sorry if I've sounded tetchy, it's just frustrating: a plan of action was drawn up for the MM guide over several days, during which nobody objected to what was suggested. Now I come to do it I'm finding that pages are being deleted - by people who took part in the discussion - before they can even be completed. --NieA7 09:04, 18 July 2006 (CDT)

In the past ppl have made categories - Mo/R builds was an example, these were all shot down so I'm going from that, and if a type of builds needs its own category we're going wrong somewhere, all the MM builds can be cut down into a couple &mdash; Skuld  09:05, 18 July 2006 (CDT)


 * I agree there are too many MM builds - that was part of the reason why I created a temporary category in the first place, it'd give testers a simple page they could go to to see which builds needed voting on one way or another. Concentrates the mind and all that. Once it'd been narrowed down to a couple there'd be no need for a category any more.
 * On an unrelated note how do you make comments on the talk page so that the Recent Changes shows that handy dandy little arrow that links directly to the section you modified? --NieA7 09:11, 18 July 2006 (CDT)
 * type /* Why it was Created */, or just press the little "edit" button next to the section name on the page for auto-text :) &mdash; Skuld  09:16, 18 July 2006 (CDT)


 * What, this button? --NieA7 09:26, 18 July 2006 (CDT)


 * Bwa ha ha, it works ^.^ Now I've just gotta remember to tick the minor edit box... --NieA7 09:27, 18 July 2006 (CDT)

Violation of "Don't immediately delete" policy?
How is the deletion of this page consistent with "Don't immediately delete"? The page was up less than 24 hours, was unfinished (and hence ineligible for deletion according to Criteria for deletion), was a temporary measure as described above and on Talk:General minion mastery guide and I very definitely had a dissenting opinion as to whether it should be deleted. I said what I intended to do on the MM talk page and nobody objected there, or indeed anywhere else at any point up to and including now - if anybody has a problem with what was suggested it would be useful if they said so, rather than removing all the unfinished work before I've had a chance to draw it all together.

To date virtually all the changes I have made in an effort to tidy up the MM guide have been deleted or reverted. I've tried to explain what I'm doing and why but all that has been ignored in preference of deleting content almost as soon as it has gone up. Admins are busy I'm sure, but it would be much appreciated if they could talk before acting and look before removing. --NieA7 08:30, 18 July 2006 (CDT)
 * Sorry NieA7, I thought I did explain >< memory failing me in old age. GW:DID poses as an official policy but it has had input in from about 2 people &mdash; Skuld  09:07, 18 July 2006 (CDT)