Talk:Necromancer Tyrian armor/Male

 ""  Bzu-wha...? How did I do that? *digs through history* Ah, [ this would be why] - an anon deleted the links to them, and no one noticed. Gem actually deleted three of them back in January, I only deleted the 'back' image in June. I can restore them now if you want. Bah, it's been too long for the ones Gem deleted, they've been removed from the database entirely. &mdash;Dr Ishmael 01:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * This is from the candidates for deletion page: Note: Before deleting armor images due to the reason "Unused", please check relevant armor art articles and make sure a corresponding armor image of at least the same quality, if not better, exists. If the unused image is of better quality than the corresponding armor image being used, please switch the two. How did you both miss this? Cress Arvein [[Image:Cress sig.JPG]] 02:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * When I'm deleting nearly 300 unused armor images (I think that's how many I got during the June cleanup), I'm not going to check every single one of them, especially when they aren't named in the "proper" format. After checking the first 25 or so, I found that all of them had been either replaced or re-uploaded with the correct names, so I made an assumption (which I thought was well-founded) that the same thing had happened to 99% of the other orphaned armor images.  Apparently this was the 1% where that was not true.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 03:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Lol. ^_^ Bot-mode ftw! RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.jpg]] 04:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, to atone for my sin of assumption, I can buy this armor for my male necro (the somewhat-cheap set in LA) and upload the overview pics. &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 05:35, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * You'll want to do the component images too since they were done with the old default color. Jennalee 07:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)