Talk:Item spell skills quick reference

added: Destructive was Glaive, this skill is not listed as an Item Spell by Anet but it has the exact same properties. -- Xeon 22:50, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Can someone check if those two are item skills, and change their templates if they are? My EotN trial ran out :( Cress Arvein 01:32, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * They say "Spell" so I am assuming they are not technically item skills. I know from using them that they do actually summon ashes. Make of that what you will, I never really understood the debate about Glaive anyway... [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 01:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * So Anet screwed up item spells in EotN. Good to hear. Cress Arvein 01:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Umm, Glaive wasn't from EotN...--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 01:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I know, but the other two are. Cress Arvein 01:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Li Ming and Lee Sa are messed up like Glaive is. (their description doesn't say item spell, just spell) -- Shadow crest   01:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Is it just their "description" that's messed up, or are they really not item spells? Can someone test with a skill that affects item spells but not regular ones, if there is such a thing?--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 01:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * They function like an item spell (like Glaive) but aren't called item spells (like Glaive), which was the argument about Glaive in the first place. -- Shadow crest   01:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)