Category talk:Special profession

Oh, smart. 06:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Is that sarcastic? RT | Talk  06:13, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope. This is a good idea. An even better idea that just occurred to me, though, would be Category:Uses Monster Skill. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 06:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

why is this special instead of "no" profession... also.. if it does damage with daggers, its a sin. otherwise, its doing dagger damage magically with no points in dagger mastery. same for other weapons. &mdash;♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 08:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

We are also using profession=monster on the skills. I don't see why for example the Kuunavang couldn't just be a monster? If nobody comments on this, I'm eventually going to adjust these to monster and remove the category. --◄mendel► 15:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree, I see no point to this category, I just didn't feel motivated enough to comment on it before now. If anything, these foes shouldn't be considered to have a "special" profession, they just lack any obvious clues to their true profession (mostly because they only use monster skills).  They should instead be put in Category:Research needed until their profession can be verified when they drop a tome.  Shiro and the two forms of Varesh could easily be classified based on the weapons they use, but I know a lot of people don't think that's enough evidence.  &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 18:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)