User talk:Drick10

User talk:Drick10/Archive 1

W/N Whirling Axe build
Meh... I think it's fine, it just needs one or two skill tweaks. In both versions, the *serious* flaw (and only mitigation in damage) is a kiting opponent, and in AB and RA, opponents will kite nonstop. I suggest removing Res Signet in AB for Axe Rake, and Executioner's Strike in RA for it. Yes, I know Exec Strike seems like a big loss in DPS, but honestly, if you can't hit the target to begin with, your DPS is sucking anyway (and compare it to the other two... you can't lose the Deep Wound, and the interrupt is just too critical to pass up). If those changes were implemented (to the main build), I'd favor it. -Auron  19:11, 5 March 2007 (CST)
 * Thanks for feedback, changed accordingly. Drick10  [[Image:CIAvvy.jpg|19px|||My Talk]] 06:34, 6 March 2007 (CST)

Dude, your pic is hard to see, get another on :P or enlarge it:

Its just an avvy... and please sign your comments.. Drick10  08:31, 6 March 2007 (CST)
 * Damn I forgot that -- Sig mA  [[Image:omigod.jpg|19px]] 08:32, 6 March 2007 (CST)
 * Testing, not sure if anything above 19px is allowed though. Drick10  [[Image:CIAvvy.jpg|24px|||My Talk]] 08:34, 6 March 2007 (CST)


 * Looks best on 38.. but i dont know... Drick10  [[Image:CIAvvy.jpg|24px|||My Talk]] 08:34, 6 March 2007 (CST)

Hmm?
"This user thinks that User:Solus is a living contridiction." Because I vote on the builds you post, which usually have 1-2 different skills to other builds? Solus  00:29, 9 March 2007 (CST)
 * Not that, read the other builds, not my mistakes. Drick10  [[Image:CIAvvy.jpg|19px|||My Talk]] 00:32, 9 March 2007 (CST)

Examples? Solus  00:33, 9 March 2007 (CST)
 * (From Build:W/N Furion's Hammer)Drop tiger stance, Flail with Rush as a cancel stance is enought, i'ts hard to say what esle can be used. Maybe drop some points and take up Tactics for Healing and Watch Yourself/Fear me. Solus [[image:Shield_of_Judgment.jpg|19px]] 08:03, 6 March 2007 (CST)


 * (From Build:W/any The Feared Soldier)Soliders Fury > Soliders Stance. Not enought Adrenaline gain for Fear me and Watch yourself. I tried this Before, didn't work well. Solus 08:53, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Contradicting dont you think? someone's got a bar full of aldrenaline skills, you dont like mark of fury but you'll try it anyway but in Build:W/N Master of Fury you said that oh, i'm sick of it. unfavoured. hammer variaint cant do well anyway. Drick10  00:44, 9 March 2007 (CST)

Trying to improve builds so they don't end up like others, and you judge me. Btw, have you read Soliders Stance and compared to Soliders Fury before? Solus  00:48, 9 March 2007 (CST)

I'll do it for you, at 12 Tactics Soliders Stance lasts 9 seconds, at 0 Leadership Soliders Fury Lasts 10 seconds and has a 5 second recharge time compared to a 8 second recharge. Solus  00:49, 9 March 2007 (CST)


 * HAH! just by not reading the attributes yourself, you contradict yourself on trying to improve other's builds. Also, you contradict yourself again in asking others to read what the skills does. Hello? unlike Soldier's Fury, Soldier's Stance is a STANCE man it ACTIVATES INSTANTLY. you dont need to stand still every TEN seconds to cast Soldier's Fury. you might underestimate me, but dont you think, someone who borthers to write a build in the proper format, has failed to factor in other IAS'es that might be better? Drick10 [[Image:CIAvvy.jpg|19px|||My Talk]] 00:52, 9 March 2007 (CST)


 * I'd rather use Soliders fury with a Buff like Rush. How is making it a stance better? Shorter durations for 1 extra second faster cast time? Solus  [[image:Shield_of_Judgment.jpg|19px]] 01:02, 9 March 2007 (CST)
 * When you cast Soldier's Fury, you actually stand still for about 1.25 seconds, and the person kiting you will only be too pleased at the delay you have inbetween attacks. The important part about stances is that theres totally no delay, and it gives you a whole new window for insigna's and such. Drick10 [[Image:CIAvvy.jpg|19px|||My Talk]] 01:05, 9 March 2007 (CST)
 * One thing Solus. its really about wiki itself that my builds turn out this way.You see, any warrior builds without deep wound=useless, so on and so forth. i would love to just replace gash or final thrust with a running stance, but then i'll get people complaining about "no final thrust, yuck" and "wheres deep wound?" i would very much like to say "HELLO WAKE UP PEOPLE! NOT ALL BUILDS HAVE TO HAVE DEEP WOUND AND WHATEVER YOU LIKE! ITS A BUILD, LIKE IT OR NOT! VOTE PROPERLY!" but no. it'll be useless. the community is unchangeable. oh well.(P.S. most of the time i agree, they make viable points, but sometimes the problems seems so small to me it makes me laugh when people aruge about it.) Drick10  [[Image:CIAvvy.jpg|19px|||My Talk]] 01:12, 9 March 2007 (CST)

So at 0 leadership v 12 tactics your only arguement is aftercast? Funny when your oppentent walks off then. Solus  01:12, 9 March 2007 (CST)

Please Add "This user thinks SBR loves potatoes" (I really would like that.) --SBR 01:14, 9 March 2007 (CST)