Talk:Warrior Elite Templar armor

That is not an ascended version os the armor. It's just an NPC alternate skin one. Just look many NPCs, like Casha, Jamei, etc... they have unique colors in their armor. This is the same. Armor descriptions should only be added if playing characters can wear it. Mithran 15:46, 23 October 2006 (CDT)

I agree with some of what you say, but the NPC armor is more different than just "unique colors." Casha and Jamei have only unique colors, where as this particular NPC's armor looks a lot better with a different skin design altogether. Compare the pictures before you eagerly type. In my opinion, this could be an ascended version. I consider your comment a swing and a miss; you were talking about color differences, while I was talking about the design. However I somewhat agree that an armor page should only be added if playing characters can wear it (if that's what you meant). A more appropriate title would have been Ascended Knight's Armor Theory. I think the page was interesting and should be kept with that alternate page title. I have read some forums and many others believe this could have been the ascended version as well. I am new to making pages, so I won't fight up and down to keep the page up, but I do think that could have been the ascended version of the knight armor. Some don't get to see Duke Gaban because they might not have the Prophecies campaign. This image might be new to some. Also, this article had only been up for about two hours and you already sent a request to delete it. Please abide the Guildwiki policy: "In general, don't be hasty to undo the hard work of other contributors!" Billyib 20:02, 23 October 2006 (CDT)
 * I was not the one who marked this to deletion, someone else did so, but did not explained why. There are a lot of more armor player won't use, like... well... Togo's ritualist outfit, Devona's Armor, Eve's gear... and we are not adding them. Having the same model but different skin is not enogh to say it's the 'Ascended' version of the armor. That's is only enough to make a trvia note o something like that. Someday, if they actually add the armor, the article should be created but not now, since it does not exist and can't be purchased by playing characters. Mithran 05:24, 24 October 2006 (CDT)

NO such armor, i change my mind, should be deleted. Arkamedes 21:19, 23 October 2006 (CDT)


 * There is no Ascended Knight's Armor and creating an article to say that there isn't one is ridiculous. Just place a note in Duke Baradin's article that says his armor is a customized version of knight's armor. That makes a lot more sense. --Karlos 02:21, 24 October 2006 (CDT)


 * No such object available = no reason for article. This is an NPC skin, and can be documented on the Duke Baradin article.  --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:04, 24 October 2006 (CDT)

Sooo.. it seems Barradin fooled us all! Clever guy. Sidar 03:29, 21 April 2007 (CDT)

It's real
I find it amusing to see this talk page. It appears that they forgot much of the armour for the Marhan's Grotto crafter. --Curse You 23:02, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
 * What are you talking about? I assume you realize the armor was just added today, right? all their previous discussion was totally valid before this, I don't get what you're saying.--Xapti 23:14, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
 * My point is that I find it amusing how people were getting all worked up about something, even going so far as to want to change the article to "Ascended Knight's Armor Theory" and then it actually gets added to the game. --Curse You 23:16, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

there goes 80k well spent
all for my picture in the... er... wiki? --Honorable Sarah 00:09, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Wow. That looks awful. All in the name of science...? 69.128.204.61 00:23, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
 * I kinda like it. Helmet's not great, but otherwise... ^_^ Arshay Duskbrow 00:31, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
 * It's decent on females. Looks like anet made another set of useless armor. They know damn well a full knight's set would do you no good, yet they still did it. I wish they would've at least made multiple helms with +1 for weapons....I kinda like it =/ P A R A S I T I C 01:55, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Why is it useless? Because you forgot that the Knight's damage reduction only applies to the location of the hit, since they changed it ages ago?24.127.51.40 03:50, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
 * You're kidding, right? It's a damned miniskirt. Why can't the female armors ever look like armor? --Sair [[Image:Ranger-icon-small.png]] 14:32, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
 * Kurzick, 15k Kurzick, 15k Luxon, Platemail, 15k Platemail, Wyvern, Dragon, Sunspear, Elite Sunspear... 69.128.206.118 12:11, 22 April 2007 (CDT)

Can you say fugly? looks horrible dyed --Lania Elderfire 02:09, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
 * For once, I think the men's gear looks far better than the women's. Look at those leggings. Fail. 69.128.204.61 05:11, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
 * It's not really bad; it look like designed in the past, when only Prophecies exist. Sad my Warrior is male, because I like the female version too much! (The next ArenaNet step must be add the possibility to add insignias to all armors in the game!)--NeHoMaR 06:20, 21 April 2007 (CDT)


 * They will... once Eye of the North comes out. 69.128.206.118 12:11, 22 April 2007 (CDT)

Helm
Let me guess.... +1 strength? &mdash; Skuld 04:30, 21 April 2007 (CDT)

Old Pic
what happened to the first picture we had of the armor? It looked better than this one... the whole "stand at attention" thing always makes the blasted armors look bad... -Kumdori 05:45, 21 April 2007 (CDT)
 * I agree, I'd be inclined to do something about it if I had the full set, but I didn't make the helm. -Gildan Bladeborn 08:44, 21 April 2007 (CDT)

Page Title
Shouldn't this page's title be Warrior's Ascended_Knight%27s_Armor? If you look at e.g. http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Knight%27s_armor, at the Art Used section, every other Warrior Armor art has the Warrior prefix. 61.208.142.93 06:34, 21 April 2007 (CDT)

Dye Color
What's the dye color used on the picture of the dyed pictures of the female armor? Purple? Jolla Himself 10:00, 22 April 2007 (CDT)