User:Jagre8304

Hi, my name is Brien. I am 22 years old and enjoy swimming in the cold waters of Lake Tahoe year round. I was drawn to the guildwiki page to see the builds section, because people on guild wars talk about it all the time.

I do not understand what has been called the (upcoming) "build section nerf" or what will happen exactly to the builds section. I have read it one time, and am pretty sure that I am in disagreement with it.

I pride myself on my abilities for logical reasoning and am definitely smarter than the average pumpkin seed, if you know what i mean. I even have come up with theories that expand on the theory (although now proven) theory of relativity ><. I like to laugh, but have a usually self-defeating tendency to be defensive when I know I am right.

I enjoy playing ranger, necromancer elementalist, monk, dervish, and paragon, but will probably refrain from posting any more builds for a while.

anyways, that's me.

peace, love.

Jagre 03:01, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

Discussion Page
Read Through The Entire Thing Before You Respond Negatively.

It now appears more more clear to me that the "User: Jagre Discusssion page" is not actually "my discussion page." It appears to be, istead a discussion page for everyone on the subject of me for whcih I am mainly responsible for maintaining - that is when I am in better regards with community - and not banned.

Please realize that this is not, as Defiant Elements would call a "mood swimg" but a simple relation of my understanding.

It has simply never been expained to me before, and I had to learn it through experience. For reference, people here, with the exception of Auron, do not try to explain the errors of my (and I assume other peoples' ways), and punish them through various ways more often.

Although it seems that all my past requests for respect and refraint from (whatever) have either fallen on deaf ears or have been responded to by statements reffering to my own ignorance, well ...it's whatever.

I don't know if there are articles in existence you could refer me to to for additional knowledge on this subject (besides GW:NRA and GW:NPA) or if they are waiting to be written, but again, I still do not quite understand the procedures of wiki, and again, it would help if someone could explain them to me (which many could easily have the time for - if they spent less time punishing me (by which I mean (whatever)) (although I probably will not be returning to wiki as much anyways and am probably banned forever anyways).

additionally, please note that I was banned for pointing out the actions of others - specifically - the last edits I made before I was banned were creating the User: (...) sections of this discussion page. My edits before that, I think were all or mostly directed to the Build:N/Me Spiteful Haste, if I remember right (i even did a calculus equation it took an hour to find out I didn't need to do it), and my actions after the ban we can not talk about since it will only further fuel the fire. I ask of you: Please Do Not Discuss Them, as it will result in "tainting the water in the cup." I will not thank you in advance because this probably won't happen.

-Jagre

What is A Personal Attack? /double standards
I was banned for pointing out the actions of other people. This can be proven by looking at the history.

(insert history here)

...The final edits that resulted in my ban were the "User: (...)" sections of the User: Jagre Discussion page, even though there is similar things on peoples' pages besides mine.

In order to warrant a ban, these edits must be seen as negative, and what is important to the point of this essay, is that they are negative for a specific reason. Why are they negative?

I do not feel good about answering that question because I'm sure that A) nobody will agree with it and B) it will result in a huge argument (lol - not a big deal), but what I think should be realized by any sane person, using logic to come to conclusion, is that these edits, specifically, were the last straw as far as letting me stay in GuildWiki and that there was something wrong with them in order to warrant a ban.

Now I ask you a rather serious simple question: Are the aspects of these edits that warranted a ban also in other edits, by other people, and should those people also be held to the same standard that I am held to?

Maybe it's different from a series of similar things, and someone who does it one time can get away with it without anything happening to them. And maybe that is the case here. I am just asking.

Is this a personal attack? This is, in a way. This very edit could be seen as negative, because it suggests other people are bad.

-Jagre. strikethrough is important part of essay (-jagre).