Talk:Garfazz Bloodfang (quest)

We should move this to Garfazz Bloodfang (Quest). The article Garfazz Bloodfang should be about the Charr boss. --Tetris L 22:42, 13 Oct 2005 (EST)


 * Be my guest. :) --Karlos 23:21, 13 Oct 2005 (EST)


 * Or: We leave this articles as it is (quite a few articles already link here) and name the article for the boss Garfazz Bloodfang (Boss) or Garfazz Bloodfang (Creature) or similar.
 * Or: We cover both in 1 article, splitting it into 2 main sections "Garfazz Bloodfang, the Quest" and "Garfazz Bloodfang, the Charr Boss".
 * Following my new personal policy to keep information together I'd prefer the latter. --Tetris L 23:53, 13 Oct 2005 (EST)


 * See? This is why Freedom is a bad thing. This is why all leaders of empires were dictators. :) You get a litle freedom and look what you do with it. Tsk tsk tsk. :)
 * Seriously though, I am against the latter approach. We have a system (ugly or pretty) of separating different articles about different thing. Garfazz the quest is not Garfazz the boss. Let's just do Garfazz (Quest) to follow the example of Kilroy (Quest). After all, Garfazz' article will point to Garfazz (Quest). It's not like the user will be taken to something completely irrelevant. --Karlos 00:33, 14 Oct 2005 (EST)