GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/RoseOfKali (2)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

== RoseOfKali (talk &bull; contribs &bull; edit count &bull; RFA page) ==

For a long time now, RoseOfKali has been one of the most active remaining editors on GuildWiki. Although Rose has occasionally gotten into altercations with other editors in the past, they arise not out of personal feelings but out of an earnest desire for the improvement of the wiki. I am confident that Rose will be able to responsibly use the sysop tools on a regular basis.
 * As an aside, image work and such might help her spend some of her time in Ukrainian captivity. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 20:24, September 7, 2009 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


 * I accept, and I finally have regular access to the internet again. RoseOfKali [[Image:RoseOfKaliSIG.png]] 11:02, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

RfA ended 24/12/09, candidate unsuccessful (bureaucrat couldn't reach a clear decision for or against)

RfA revisited 23/12/10, candidate promoted (I finally put community standards above my own, --◄mendel► 23:21, 22 December 2010 (UTC))

Supporting Qualities

 * Loyal
 * Respected by the community
 * Likely to be good at enforcing policies
 * An ability to move beyond conflicts and not hold grudges
 * Upholds and constitues (?) proper GuildWiki procedure.
 * accepts compromises []

Negative Qualities

 * not consistently good at mediating
 * Has tended to, in previous times, be somewhat of a drama magnet
 * User has had conflicts with others in the past
 * has had AGF problems with "bad" suggestions in the past
 * Occasional reactionary opposition to new methods
 * Very tenacious in content debates

Community Support
''Please place your signature to indicate your support or non-support. Do not argue. Also realize that this is in no way influential towards the other merits of the candidate, just a gauge of public support.''

I support this candidacy.

 * 1) Nwash 07:28, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)   &mdash; Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 07:45, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Jimbo321 08:56, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) -- [[Image:merty_sign.gif]]-- ( talk ) 09:15, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Random Time 
 * 6) &mdash; Balistic  23:37, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) --[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]]El_Nazgir 15:02, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Cress Arvein [[Image:Cress sig.JPG]]
 * 9)  Jink  16:56, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) A_F_K_sig_2.jpg A F K When Needed 16:47, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 18:44, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) [[File:User Ariyen sig icon.gif]]riyen 20:55, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) &mdash;Dr Ishmael [[Image:Diablo_the_chicken.gif]] 22:26, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) Khazad Guard 15:51, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * 15) --Gimmethegepgun 18:22, November 17, 2009 (UTC)

I oppose this candidacy.

 * 1) &mdash;[[Image:MaySig.png]] Warw/Wick 15:49, October 9, 2009 (UTC)

I am neutral/undecided.

 * 1) your sig here


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.