User talk:Fatigue4214

Sunspear / allegiance profession Skill pages
Those are really unneeded. 67.162.10.70 21:12, 27 June 2007 (CDT) Allegiance ones too. Honestly, there's ONE skill per page. 67.162.10.70 21:13, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
 * adding to profession quick references, login if you want me to value your opinion. --Fatigue` ( talk / contribs ) 21:15, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
 * I don't need to log in, there's no policy against me remaining as an anon but I know that creating 20 articles for 20 skills is useless. And I will tag them for deletion if no one says otherwise. 67.162.10.70 22:34, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
 * you don't need to bold words, i can read with my own emphasizing. the purpose of the pages is to merely keep everything uniform.  i will talk to some people for their input, thank you for your concern.  --Fatigue` ( talk / contribs ) 22:46, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
 * They are not nessecary. We already have identical information on Sunspear skill and Kurzick/Luxon skills quick reference and Kurzick/Luxon skill and the individual skill pages. &mdash; ♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 23:19, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
 * I see nothing wrong with it. Atm, people who do not know about the PvE only skill pages, would have no info about them at all. Seems perfectly acceptable, though that is not my decision to make. Readem (talk *contribs ) 00:13, 28 June 2007 (CDT)


 * yes jedi, i am aware there was a single separate page for all 20 skills. to add them to their specific profession professions' qr, however, i chose to create separate pages for each skill to keep the profession specific qr's clean.  and readem is correct, some players still are unaware of the title linked skills, and what happens when the link to their single qr is taken off the main page?  that qr wont be checked as much as the profession specific ones and those who come to gw in anticipation of gw:en won't know anything about them. i personally never checked the sunspear and allegiance pages before the skills. --Fatigue` ( talk / contribs ) 00:21, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
 * I think the issue is whether we should use separate subpages for consistancy or just include something like this at the bottom of the main QR articles.

==Allegiance rank== ==Sunspear rank==
 * -- Gordon Ecker 00:33, 28 June 2007 (CDT)
 * well i thought of that but i chose to go for consistancy because gw:en promises 100 new skills per profession, 100 is a lot for just 1 or 2 more to be added to these title linked skills. not saying they will, but who knows. there are also going to be "Three or more new titles corresponding to reputation with the Asura, Deldrimor and Norn." which could result in more 'allegiance' skills. --Fatigue` ( talk / contribs ) 00:42, 28 June 2007 (CDT)


 * GW:YAV. Don't be a dick, Fatigue. &mdash;Tanaric 03:46, 28 June 2007 (CDT)

They're fine, they look silly on their own but I can see what they're used for (scroll down). &mdash; Skuld 04:06, 28 June 2007 (CDT)


 * I shall add that if anything these articles can redirect. The use Skuld pointed out does not require inclusion. These pages are completely unnessecary as one skill qrs. They contain no new information. They do not fulfill what is, to me, the main purpose of a qr: to show many skills of a type in a fashion that allows you to easily compair costs and results. &mdash; ♥ Jedi ♥ Rogue ♥ 12:15, 28 June 2007 (CDT)


 * Sorry about that, I replied to an old revision and wiped some of the conversation. I have restored it. &mdash;Tanaric 12:48, 28 June 2007 (CDT)


 * I appreciate the inclusion of the new skills in the quick refs, both using subpages for consistancy and putting the skills directly in the main articles for simplicity have their merits. It only really makes a difference while searching or editing. -- Gordon Ecker 21:16, 28 June 2007 (CDT)