Talk:Conflagration

I have serious doubts about the correctness of that note. Has anyone tested it? This will be the only spirit in the game that maintains any notion of who summoned it, if the note is indeed correct. F G 20:46, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
 * "For creatures within its range" | Chuiu 20:49, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
 * Yeah, but it says "for creatures within its range ... your ...". That's the part that threw me off or I'd have simply nixed the note like you did. F G 20:50, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
 * What FG said. Damn edit conflicts. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 20:52, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
 * Why would it say "For creatures within its range" then? I'm confused! | Chuiu 21:00, 24 April 2006 (CDT)
 * The creatures within its range are the creatures for which your arrows do fire damage? I dunno, it makes no sense. WTF, Anet? &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 21:06, 24 April 2006 (CDT)

I got the actually description now, seems more reasonable :p Skuld  14:03, 30 April 2006 (CDT)

Does this actually negates effect of other spirits like Winnowing?
 * Things like winnowing and order of pain will no longer add their damage to bow attacks, if that's what you mean. --68.142.14.19 21:48, 21 July 2006 (CDT)