User talk:Mgrinshpon/Touch Ranger replacement

Interesting hypothesis, but I disagree it would be any stronger. The lack of defensive stances is a big minus, not to mention the sacrifice from CF would lower the healed amount. Having said that, I have no beef with the touch rangers. :) --Ufelder 08:50, 20 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Well, if you take a gander at the touch ranger talk, lots of touches should be spells have been flying around. The power in this is the beastly power of a group of them healing each other. If not that, how about a roundabout circle of 4 bonds moving in concert and lots of prot spells? Guardian, RoF, etc? I say that's where it's at. The point is, in terms of DPS, this would decimate touch rangers with a group of 4 doing 320DPS. --Mgrinshpon 09:47, 21 October 2006 (CDT)
 * I like this. Touches being spells would kill more than touch rangers though, I use a ranger wth lightning touch, conjure lightning, and barrage. There is no way I could use my close range defense (lightning touch) without ecpertise on the touch.--Coloneh [[Image:Coloneh.png]] 00:41, 22 October 2006 (CDT)