User talk:Blastedt1447

Rate-a-user
Favoured:
 * 1) (your vote here)

Unfavoured:
 * 1) (your vote here)

Delete:
 * 1) (your vote here)

Discussion
unball...? what do you mean?(since you unfavoured my build, it HAS to mean something)Drick10 08:45, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Sorry for not cluing you in, its about my build, Build:D/W Alone With the Reaper

Kindly respond on the Disscusion page. thank you.Drick10 08:45, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * As in, move about and not be near eachother for YAA. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 08:46, 21 January 2007 (CST)


 * yes.. did you even test my build? or did you just shun it because of its skill-set?(no offense meant here) Drick10 09:08, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * Testing isn't required. I don't have a warrior that far with that many skillz even though &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 09:13, 21 January 2007 (CST)


 * You mean you cant just unfavour someother person's build just like that? with no reason what soever or explaination? This means alot to me, and i dont appreciate people just unfavouring my build for no reason... Drick10 09:18, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * I gave a reason, and it already had 3 unfavored votes lol. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 09:19, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * I'm waiting for their replies.... just want to find out why, and what i can do. if you have no other reason, kindly remove your vote.. its depressing, really. Drick10 09:22, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * Yeah, I have two unfavored builds too. QQ &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 09:22, 21 January 2007 (CST)\


 * i think theres some misconception, YAA is supposed to have enemies that are not nearby (which is 1/8th* of aggro bubble) to activate. did you mean that? Drick10 09:32, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * Yes, and that they are usually too lazy to move that far away. QQ &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 09:34, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * And you would think you, as a user would have the common sense not to use it on them?(Not meant as a insult Drick10 09:38, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * Your build says your target is spellcasters. QQ, this discussion is over. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 09:41, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Ah, whatever you say...i wont take it to heart..Drick10 09:44, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Warning
Such actions as you displayed in Build talk:Mo/E Glyph Shield of Regen will result in a ban on your next offense. Please act mature and respect other users. &mdash; Gares 18:20, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * ? I didn't really have a name for there, so I just put in New Page... Sorry...&mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 18:30, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Also, the /point /laugh is my generic unfavored vote of the day, sorry. it had nothing to do with the name... &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 18:45, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Boxes
ZOMGLOL XD Entropy 20:04, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * I win. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 20:04, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * And I dind't steal a single one of them. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 20:05, 20 January 2007 (CST)

Entropy 20:07, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * I heard they're writing a new children's book, "Blastedt and the Night of 100 Userboxes". Entropy 20:09, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * everyone support my campaign now. lololololol link in the header &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 20:10, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Heres the userbox:
 * Oh, thats what | I thought it was plaintext lol. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 20:12, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * I'm a supporter. Entropy 20:13, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * KK :D &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 20:13, 20 January 2007 (CST)


 * Me too (adds box) :D--Blade [[Image:smallscout.png]] (talk|contribs) 20:50, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Yay! Although, my form of the box looks somewhat better, and there are 101 boxes now entropy :) &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 20:52, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Now everyone should use with no subst so I can update globally.  &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 20:55, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Clever. Duly noted and done. Entropy 20:57, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Kay, thanks. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 20:58, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * I'll beat you w/o doin that.--Hellbringer (talk|contribs) 21:10, 20 January 2007
 * Yours aren't much more creative tbh -.- Entropy 21:05, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * tbh? Anyways, hellbring, you have 41.  Nowhere near my massive 101 &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 21:07, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * "To Be Honest", gee and I thought I didn't get out enough. ;) Entropy 21:09, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * And what does "afaik" mean? &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 21:10, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * "As Far As I Know" Entropy 21:11, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * And "lol"? &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 21:12, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * "Laugh Out Loud" You know all these already, though, stop kidding me :) Entropy 21:13, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * I didn't know afaik and tbh though. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 21:15, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * There is no ORIGINALITY IN THE USERBOXES. Ours actually are more originale than yalls. After the second one ur originality died.
 * I win anyway. Take mine off your page. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 21:54, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * Yours are not any more original. At least we worked harder than you'all. Entropy 21:56, 20 January 2007 (CST)
 * lol, look at how skinny this column has gotten!
 * well, anyway, I don't know whether to congratulate you (on the tons of userboxes) or shoot you in the face for making my eyes bleed (with all of the same userboxes with different numbers >< ) XD --Cynn 00:48, 26 January 2007 (CST)

Gotta go, bed
May the legacy live overnight. &mdash;Blastedt&mdash; 21:43, 20 January 2007 (CST)

PLEASE DO NOT REVERT EARNEST HARD WORK ON A WHIM
Hello. I have just spent the last few hours testing The Hero's Challenge quest and you have reverted INSTANTLY! Please read the Discussion page for our talk on the matter - I am a tad annoyed about this as I have just proved the requirements... -- Joseph C 10:16, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * ..................................................................my monk did it just by changing his second prof a week ago. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 10:17, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * and where was he created, and what time? the discussion page shows there could be two different requirements depending on if created after an update... Perhaps it would be a better idea if we have it proved both, to insert both on main page as an either/or section in requirements. Joseph C
 * Obviously created in tyria. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 10:22, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * Yes, but if you read discussion in full, you will see that an update occurred which affects the requirements, depending on the time the character was created.' So it appears that we may both be correct depending on this. Understand what I am explaining? Joseph C 10:25, 21 January 2007 (CST)

hi
dnd much :/ &mdash; Skuld 17:13, 21 January 2007 (CST)
 * oopsies :P &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 18:58, 21 January 2007 (CST)

Reverts
Don't be so quick to try and jump on somebody, if you don't know their intentions give it a minute. --FireFox  19:06, 26 January 2007 (CST)
 * .......ok..........&mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 19:07, 26 January 2007 (CST)
 * Please see my comments on User_talk:Corsaire re violations by both parties of GW:1RV. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:05, 27 January 2007 (CST)

Vandals
Damn man, you're too fast for me today. I was gonna catch those three but got into edit conflicts with you. :) Entropy 15:04, 27 January 2007 (CST)
 * lol &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 15:05, 27 January 2007 (CST)

Just a thought
What was the reasoning of the vote. You had it set as sensible vote, whereas only reasoning was the two skills, which at the time skuld was agreeing with me.--Sneakysmith12 17:19, 28 January 2007 (CST)
 * I don't need ot explain my damn reasons, too bored to do so. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 17:20, 28 January 2007 (CST)
 * This is not good Blastedt.. I recommend you put effort in, else do not participate. &mdash; Skuld 17:24, 28 January 2007 (CST)
 * :( And I've told him that things like that have been unfavored, and I don't really know how to explain it. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 17:25, 28 January 2007 (CST)
 * What? Dig up the links, cite the reasons &mdash; Skuld 17:27, 28 January 2007 (CST)
 * * Cries* &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 17:28, 28 January 2007 (CST)
 * Thank you Skuld. I kinda like having some support there.--Sneakysmith12 17:51, 28 January 2007 (CST) YAY remeberd signing thing.

Show/Hide
You don't have one for your spoiler tag. Phail! &mdash; Rapta   (talk|contribs) 18:41, 29 January 2007 (CST)
 * KK &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 18:42, 29 January 2007 (CST)
 * Now I do, and I've tried the navigation, it doesnt work, so don't ask :P &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 18:45, 29 January 2007 (CST)

Some Discretion Wouldn't Hurt
You know, making openly harrassing and sarcastic remarks like the ones you left in Build talk:A/Me DB Nuker are completely un-called for and come extremely close to violating GW:YOU. As an active contributor to the wiki, I expect a little bit more from you than your average one-shot pop in and pop out flamer that comes in to the wiki from time to time. I'm asking you to behave like a respectable member of this community from another contributor's frame of reference. I know I have my moments as well but I feel it as my duty to call you out on this particular one. I know you're better than that. — Jyro X 16:17, 30 January 2007 (CST)
 * :( &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 16:20, 30 January 1999 (CST)
 * And I was harrasing the build, not the author! &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 16:20, 30 January 2007 (CST)
 * Please rethink your attitude, you're just being a dick.. &mdash; Skuld 09:52, 31 January 2007 (CST)
 * Sowry skuldy :( &mdash;[[image:Blastedt sig.png]]Blastedt 15:04, 31 January 2007 (CST)

PATHETIC UNDERLING
&mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nog64 (contribs).

If it's really that important to you...
Then you post the build. -.- Or one similar to it, I don't care. It just frustrated me when people didn't see the point of the build, nor did they try it before they modified it with things that I wholly felt a bad change. If I were to post a build on here I'd want it to be known I did it, and modifications that I think degrade the build from how I designed it just got frustrating. That, and the fact that multiple people got mad at me for posting my unique build, made me remove it from it's standing. If someone else wants to design a build similar to it they may be my guest, I'll probably re-establish it later, if nobody else posts a similar build. Honestly since nobody seemed to care I didn't think it was a big deal. Sure, if you really care about it being there that much, un-blank what I did. let them do as they will, I'll just end up figuring out another build later.

^^ Told you there was no reason to keep it up there.
It seems like people just don't grasp how well the build works, since I've seen firsthand by using the original build I posted in AB battles, Kurzick side, for ~8 hours straight or so, and I happen to know that if you use it properly it can be quite potent, but I removed it because nobody here at GuildWiki can understand why certain skills are used, how to use it, and apparently just can't see how it would possibly work at all. That is mostly why I removed it, I saved the time of people voting it down and eventually to be deleted anyway. ^-^ Not that I care, I honestly prefer nobody using my build but me, it makes me feel special.. That's also partially why I removed it, if people DID like it then many people would use it, and if they didn't, and they don't, it'll be deleted soon anyway. ^^ Anyway... That was all I had to say.

Recentchanges, Main Page, + Google Pagerank TM
Rather surpirsingly, those with a google pagerank on their firefox toolbar can see googles importance rating of pages. go to recent changes, look at the bar and press Main Page. THE BAR GOES DOWN! RECENT CHANGES IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE MAIN PAGE LOLOLOLOL. On a seemingly related topic, my userpage is 1/10 of the importance bar. &mdash;Blastedt 15:24, 1 February 2007 (CST)