GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Stylva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Stylva (talk &bull; contribs)

 * Candidate was unsuccessful

Has been an outstanding community member for quite some time. Was given "temporary" sysop rights earlier today to deal with an issue, and I am suggesting it be made permanent. 24.22.225.85 18:00, 14 September 2007 (CDT)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I accept the nomination. But, I want everyone to know, I am no longer as active as I once were, since I've spent most of my time at the official wiki, trying to build it up. &mdash; Stylva  (talk)(contribs) 07:30, 15 September 2007 (CDT)

Support

 * 1)  &lt;LordBiro&gt;/&lt;Talk&gt; 06:35, 15 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) She can only help, not hurt. --Karlos 13:39, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 3) &mdash; Skakid9090 21:21, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 4) [[Image:Branek-Sig.gif]] Branek  [[Image:Branek-Sig.gif]]   10:20, 26 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 5) (your vote here)

Oppose

 * 1) Little activity in the past 6 months. Admits in nom acceptance above that official wiki is his/her priority. BigAstro 11:58, 15 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) Good work with the cleanup the other day, but I think we really need active admins who are dedicated to this wiki. Biscuits [[Image:Biscuit.png]] 15:35, 16 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 3) Agreed with Biscuits - if we need additional sysops, it only makes sense to promote people who are reliably vigilant. - Auron  05:27, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 4) Isn't active enough here.  —ǥrɩɳsɧ  ƿoɲ  13:47, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 5) Not active on guildwiki, then why be an admin? Admins should be on daily patrol for vandalism, helping etc. Stylva is nowhere near that. (Oh, and sucks on gww) &mdash; S  h  a  d  y  G  u  y  10:49, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 6) Not active. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 13:34, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 7) Can't say have seen at all (not that that should be a determinining factor, could just be different timezones), and while reverting vandals actions is great, do not need to be an admin to do that (indeed many of us participate in rv'ing), however an admin does need to be actively monitoring the wiki to be ready to actually ban them in a timely manner. So sorry, cannot support this request. --Wolfie [[Image:Wolfie_sig.jpg|19px]] (talk|contribs) 21:48, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 8) Who? Lord Belar 03:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Haven't heard of this user... &mdash; S  h  a  d  y  G  u  y  11:00, 15 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 2) ditto--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 12:01, 15 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 3) ditto Silver Sunlight [[Image:SSunlight.jpg|19px]] 12:21, 15 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 4) ditto x3 The Imperialist 12:27, 15 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 5) I've seen you around before, rarely, but I don't know enough to form an educated opinion yet. Your work on GWW is commendable, but this is GWiki so...meh. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 00:26, 16 September 2007 (CDT)
 * 6) who r u? [[Image:ShidoSig_moebius2.gif]] 23:15, 25 September 2007 (CDT)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.