User talk:AudreyChandler

Hi!

If you could just explain what your attack chain QR is supposed to achieve (maybe list it under Suggestions), somebody could do it for you. -- ◄mendel► 23:23, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, please! (QR style brainstorming)
I agree with you that there's something odd about skill QRs. With 100s of skills, it's hard for anyone to really follow the sometimes subtle differences between the choices available. I'd love to hear/see your ideas. Or even your questions. I have a feeling that a new, improved presentation of skills could come out of ppl just talking about what they try to learn when they look up a skill or a table of skills. &mdash; Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 09:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Skill QR formatting
Hey all, thanks for the discussion so far. Sorry for the delay replying, been preoccupied. :P Anyway, moved it to its own suggestion talk page to better facilitate discussion since it's a Wiki-wide issue and not really just a personal thing with me. -- AudreyChandler 23:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

overextending
See User:M.mendel/Procrastination. :-P -- ◄mendel► 15:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * lol, we'll see how long it takes for my list to outpace yours. x] -- AudreyChandler 17:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

edit summaries
Your edit summaries are pure win. If you weren't also a nice, diplomatic and knowledgeable person, it would be worth having you around for these comments alone! -- ◄mendel► 22:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * lol, thank you for the kind words. Mostly, it's just a side effect of the fact that I never, ever, ever shut up. In any form of communication. Ever. x] -- AudreyChandler 15:32, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * What he said! Plus I like the fact that you are bringing order to chaos (which would be enough even if you didn't make me lol early and often)  &mdash; Tennessee Ernie Ford ( TEF ) 15:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Order? This! Is! Chaos! --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG|Ohaider!]] -- (contribs) &emsp;(talk)  18:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * So does that mean we have a new Entropy? heh.
 * On another note, I think the minor work you are doing is admirable, and your contributions to the site itself and its true purpose suits that of a normal and dedicated Wikian. I sense only women can do a so thorough and enduring job. And you ARE one, correct? :D
 * Regardless, on this site, you don't need to shut up. It's perfectly fine. :) I'll say what mendel did, only differently. YOU are pure win.--Alcedo talk -cont  12:17, 19 April 2009 (UTC)