User talk:Xis10al16772

Welcome to GuildWiki! --Jamie 06:31, 12 May 2006 (CDT)

Hi there Skuld  06:32, 12 May 2006 (CDT)

Thanks for the welcoming. Long time user now contributing.--Xis10al 06:42, 12 May 2006 (CDT)
 * If you wanted your user page to look a bit neater and compact you could change the width of your first green table from 100% to say 70% and add at the top of your page (which calls a template to float your table of contents on the right. You might like it how it is but this means you don't have such a large gap at the top where the table of contents is. There's more editing help on my user page although there's not much on templates on it. --Xasxas256 12:51, 27 May 2006 (CDT)

Users I Want to Thank
I'm a long time user of GuildWiki, but have only recently started contributing. As with any new project, I'm very much a noob at editing what I want to create. During the past few weeks, I've been looking over other user pages in an attempt to gather knowledge, and I want to give credit to those users whom I'm learning from.--Xis10al 12:24, 27 May 2006 (CDT)
 * User:Skuld
 * User:Fenris
 * User:Gem
 * User:Jamie
 * User:Xasxas256
 * User:Rainith
 * User:PanSola

The Woespreader
Hey Xis10al, I love your picture of the Woespreader, its a great picture for your userpage, however I was wondering if you can, can you upload a side image of the Woespreader for its article page. I'm on a style-drive in this category. Thank you in advance for your contribution, Jamie 06:19, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Yeah, I'll have to get the item back, as I loaned it to a guildie, but that's not a problem. Should I just replace the one I previously posted?  If so, do you want me to do the same for The Skill Eater (Focus), as I still have that item as well?
 * That would be great, ideally for weapon pics we need a side on image, so we can clearly see the item with no bodies in the way. If you can take the picture with a blue or orange sky this will contrast best with its dark tones. Thanks again. --Jamie 06:30, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
 * No problem, I'll have it updated by middle of the week at the latest.--Xis10al 06:31, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Just got the item back from my guildie last night. I'll have the new picture posted very soon.--Xis10al 10:51, 12 June 2006 (CDT)

Collector modules
I have no idea what you have in mind with your "clean up", but it led to undesirable side effects, and I found it easiest to do a massive rollback of your changes. If you find it "unclean", please discuss the specifics so we might see if there is a workaround, thanks. - 01:09, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
 * When looking at the collector's page, the TOC takes up more space than the actual article. I was trying to shorten the page a bit.  I guess the real question is, do people when looking at the collector's page actually go there and click on the collector's name or the area they are in?  By limiting it to the area, you can shorten the TOC, and the page by nearly a third.--Xis10al 01:34, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
 * We need the header so we have a direct edit link to the modules. I don't think the TOC is a problem, but if it really bothers you, you can fake one by doing what we did with Unique items list (Prophecies). - 01:44, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Sorry about any problems I might have caused. I admit that I'm still learning, but I really want to help contribute to the community that has been an invaluable asset.  I typically click on the Help tab and look through there for things I can do to help, but I'm always open to suggestion.--Xis10al 01:52, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
 * I can see you're starting to add a "fake" TOC to the collectors, I actually find the longer proper TOC useful as you can see a link to each collector. Seems to me that the TOC takes up a pretty small amount of overall space, the longer the TOC is, the longer the article is and the smaller the proportion of the article the TOC takes up, if that makes sense. Any thoughts? --Xasxas256 02:05, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
 * I honestly think the TOC took up way too much space on these pages, nearly a third of the article. And I don't know about most, but when I'm looking for a collector, I don't click on the collectors name, I click on the area I'm in and then look through the collectors in that area.  It just seems too muddled to include everything.  If I'm incorrect in my changes, I'll be glad to change it back.--Xis10al 02:17, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
 * There's nothing potentially "incorrect" about the changes, I was just wondering what general collector page has a TOC that takes up about a third of the article? I'd guess it must be a page with a very short list of collectors. The more collectors that are added, the lower the ratio of TOC to overall article is. I'm not sure if I'm explaining what I mean very well and perhaps browser rendering differences are to blame. Still you might be right about most people looking for a collector by location instead of name. You're welcome to go ahead, I won't revert the new "fake" TOC I was just wonding if you could point me towards a general collector page that has a TOC that takes up about a third of the article? Thanks. --Xasxas256 02:26, 11 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Try adding to give it a floating, right aligned TOC, see if you like that one better.  --Rainith 02:28, 11 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Check out General collectors (Kaineng City) before the updated TOC. Atleast on my Firefox browser, it was a third of the page, and that's a long list.--Xis10al 02:34, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
 * It looks ok to me, the TOC takes about about a tenth of the page when I view it in both Firefox and IE. Still your fake TOC is probably an improvement. However I'd say Rainith's idea of using the is probably best :) --Xasxas256 02:44, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
 * How might I go about combining both ideas to include the fake TOC but align it right? I think that would be perfect.--Xis10al 02:50, 11 June 2006 (CDT)

Just out of curiosity, what resolution do you have your monitor set at? EDIT - also have you changed the default Monobook style in your user preferences? That can cause things to look different on the wiki. --Rainith 02:54, 11 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Changing the line {| style="background: #F5F5F5; border: 1px solid #C0C0C0"
 * to {| style="background: #F5F5F5; border: 1px solid #C0C0C0" align="right"
 * will align it right. I think TOCright looks better though. I don't think the TOC has too much content particularly when shifted to the right. --Xasxas256 03:05, 11 June 2006 (CDT)
 * I have my resolution set to 1024x768, and have my monobook setting set to default. I notice a big difference between what I see and what my roommate sees on certain pages.  For example, on my userpage, when looking at the babel boxes, I see two rows, but my roommate sees all four babels in one row, but I've always assumed that it was due to the fact that he has a wide-screen laptop.--Xis10al 10:50, 12 June 2006 (CDT)