GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Xasxas256

Xasxas256 (talk &bull; contribs)
Xas is an active contributor, always in a good mood. He has shown great interest in the wiki and the wiki community and is doing a great job in many ways. He also lives in Australia, which means he is usually online on times when other admins might not be. -- (talk) 20:43, 8 August 2006 (CDT)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I am incredibly honoured to be nominated, I've always thought of myself as a toiler here and if I am successful it may take some time to adjust to the thought of me being a sysop! I accept the nomination and would be thankful for any chance to increase my ability to help the community and hope that given the chance, I can do us proud. --Xasxas256 20:57, 8 August 2006 (CDT)

Support

 * 1) Strong Support Xasxas256 has an excellent record with GuildWiki. Add into that the benefit of an admin from a timezone that differs from most of the rest of us (better around the clock wiki coverage), and I feel that he would make an ideal admin candidate. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:11, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 2) Conditional Support. I believe Xasxas would make an incredible day-to-day administrative task force member, including deletes and vandalhunting. That said, I'm not fully convinced he possesses the character to mediate user disputes, and I hope he leaves that job to admins more suited to the task if he is appointed to the team. As always, this vote of support does not necessarily mean I think we need more admins. &mdash;Tanaric 22:45, 8 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 3) -- [[Image:Bishop_icon2.png]] Bishop [ rap|con ] 23:39, 8 August 2006 (CDT) Xasxas256 has been a longtime contributor and has made tons and tons of solid edits. It certainly cannot hurt to have more worker bees in the admin staff.
 * 4) Strong Support A very helpful individual amongst the many contributors here at GuildWiki. He is able to provide logical reasoning to disputes that occur. Just a quick look at GuildWiki talk:Style and formatting/Builds is enough to show how effective a contributor he is at GuildWiki. &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 18:38, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 5) So long as he continues making valuable edits and keeps his pants on. --Ryard 20:45, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 6) --Vortexsam 21:47, 9 August 2006 (CDT) Helps a lot in maintenance, welcoming new users, and helping them with wikicode.
 * 7) OMG seriously Xasxas256 is the greatest dude.  Why he isn't already and admin is blowing my mind.  but he is a very helpful guy and his intentions are all good. VOTE FOR XASXAS256!!!! --Fiznuckin Biznitch 22:16, 9 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Btw: This is not a vote, we are just telling why we think that this person should be admin and showing that we trust him/her. There is no limit of votes or anything to make one an admin, it's all up to Gravewit. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] (talk) 05:33, 10 August 2006 (CDT)
 * 1) I value Xas' input and he has proven to enrich the wiki by his presence. I am sure that he'll be able to cope with anything that comes across. ~ Nilles (chat)  16:07, 21 September 2006 (CDT)
 * 2) Very sysop material, he helps everyone. And its Xas!! &mdash; Skuld 02:08, 27 September 2006 (CDT)
 * 3) Xasxas is an obvious positive influence on the wiki and I have always found him to be calm, rational and friendly in his day to day interactions with other people. I think he would make a great admin.  &lt;LordBiro&gt;/&lt;Talk&gt; 05:58, 28 September 2006 (CDT)
 * 4) The way Xas writes with authority and his prominence on the site made me think (when I saw the RFN box) that he already was an admin! His help for newcomers on his user page is invaluable, and he is polite and helpful. --  Karalin [[image:Fireball.jpg|20px]] (talk|contribs) 19:57, 28 September 2006 (CDT)
 * 5) Support. Xasxas has always been a great contributer and one of the most un-offensive ones possible. By now it is clear that he plans to stick around. --Xeeron 10:34, 1 October 2006 (CDT)
 * 6) Support. Great at helping out new people and adding to the wiki. --Armond Warblade (talk) 18:16, 7 October 2006 (CDT)
 * 7) Aye. (Again, is this vote really still open?) --MRA 07:08, 9 October 2006 (CDT)

Oppose

 * 1) (your vote here)