User talk:Chrono traveller

Math
GWiki doesn't support the math/LaTeX tag at all. I guess you figured this out already. It's something that has to be specifically set up and I guess Gravewit didn't think it would be useful. --68.142.14.92 19:35, 6 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Ok, thanks, I thought my latex skills were just getting very rusty. I just thought that, for example, the 3/4 in some casting times looks horrendous.  But then again, its probably overkill just to implement latex just for that. --Chrono traveller 19:39, 6 June 2006 (CDT)
 * The fraction issue was discussed a while ago. The archived discussion is at GuildWiki_talk:Style_and_formatting/Skills/Archive_2 (though the HTML character codes used appear to have been mussed up at some point).  Bring it up again if you want.  --68.142.14.92 20:22, 6 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Thanks for the heads up. &#190; It is then. As a side note, who are you that you're anonymous, yet know so many tricksy little details like this? Makes me suspicious <_< >_> hehe --Chrono traveller 21:13, 6 June 2006 (CDT)
 * I just started a topic concerning the format of these fractions here and would appreciate your input there. --Chi Li [[Image:Chi_Li.gif|Chi Li]] 04:25, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Thanks for organizing this. --Chrono traveller 11:06, 8 June 2006 (CDT)

Template Crusade
A big thanks for transferring so many Skillboxes to separate Templates. I received some thanks myself and thought I'd pass the buck :) --Chi Li 12:00, 8 June 2006 (CDT)

Healing on spirits
Just on your note on not being able to use healing breeze on spirits, I'm pretty sure that you can't use any normal healing spell on a spirit (ie Heal Other, Orison of Healing, Reversal of Fortune etc.) I can't test it now but I'm pretty sure I've tried in the past on Ranger Spirits and it didn't work. Actually looking at Spirit it says even Heal Area doesn't work on them, if so we probably don't need the comment on the Healing Breeze page. Thanks mate. --Xasxas256 00:49, 9 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Eh someone reverted your edit while I wrote the above, oh well I guess now you know why :P --Xasxas256 00:50, 9 June 2006 (CDT)