GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Vipermagi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Vipermagi (talk &bull; contribs)
Has not been around for very long, but I respect him and his work. Made over 2000 edits in the time he is here, of which a lot are reverts of vandalism and removing strange notes and the like. Reverts vandalism like mad and spends a lot of time and wiki. Also knows quite a bit of wiki coding and helps people out when necessary. He is well known around the community and would be a good administrator. -- talkpage 16:40, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


 * Well, if you never try, you'll never know, eh :) Hereby, I accept. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 16:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Vipermagi was made an administrator on 3-2-08.

Support

 * 1) Contributions look good to me, especially considering that most of it is vandalism reverting and that's exactly the admin specialty. -- [[Image:User Gem sig.png|Gem]] (gem / talk) 17:31, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) After a quick long contribs check, though he has quite a lot of talk pages, he does a lot of vandalism RV'ing, and hes on the wiki almost constantly. Support. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 17:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Vipermagi is a good reverter certain a good person for  Adminship--[[image:Fighterbitsjsig.jpg|19px]] Fighterbitsj--STALK MEH 18:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Has shown by the last vandals, we need more admins who are expert, almost always around Wiki, willing to help (and why not, funny too).Vipermagi is this kind of person --[[Image:Ricky_sig.jpg|18px]] Ricky  '' Happy wintersday! 22:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Contribs look very good. Support[[Image:Entrea Sumatae.png|Entrea Sumatae]]Entrea Sumatae    [Talk]  23:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Even if I don't see you much (like you said in my rfa), your contributions are good, you are very helpful, and, like Gem said, lend a hand against vandals. Cress Arvein(Talk) 00:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) /support -- Shadow  crest   00:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Commme Gem. He's generally a good knowledgeable guy for other Wiki maintenance too. [[Image:Entropy Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 16:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Anyone can revert, that's definitely not my argument. Wiki knowledge FTW.[[Image:Ereanorsign.jpg]]reanor 20:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) /support --[[Image:Feardrake.JPG]] 21:59, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) I give viper my support because of his tendancies to edit a lot and well. Good choice RT | Talk  - A joyous wintersday to all 21:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) I feel that Viper puts alot of effort here on the wiki in helping other users, fixing articles, and reverting vandals. He would be an excellent addition to the admin's team.  [[Image:Isk8.png|24px]]Isk8 21:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) He's always around, with a generally positive personality and a sharp wit. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 00:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) Because his name is dorky (real name) :P:P:P:P [[Image:ShadyGuy.jpg]] 17:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 3,000 contributions is nothing really to be proud of. &mdash;  ク  Eloc  貢  20:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You have <500 RT | Talk  - A joyous wintersday to all 21:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I never said anything about being proud of em. In fact, I'm not the one who put me up here. Taht aside, you even said you found Gimme's contribs list too small... You have high standards, my friend. Also, RT, that doesn't mean I have much. It just means he doesn't contribute alot here... --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 21:02, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Dw, eloc just attaches immense importance to his number of edits to GWW, and believes quantity is everything. Lord of all tyria 21:04, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Is it just me, or is that all that Eloc seems to be doing is voting opposed, and saying, "not enough contribs" to just about every candidate for adminship? Not that it really matters, just seems like he is trying at something.  [[Image:Isk8.png|24px]]Isk8 21:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying at anything. I do have high standards for any Sysops. &mdash;  ク  Eloc  貢  21:07, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Vipers an ok guy, and he does work quite actively reverting vandalism etc, but i dont think that I'm going to vote support, sheerly because i havnt seen his contribs >.<... I'm gonna go check them, then I may change my vote. --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] <font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 17:09, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Neutral because of the fact that wiki drama is annoying. --<font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="green">Hell <font face="vivaldi" size="3" color="red">bringer [[Image:Hellbringer sig.jpg|19px]] (T/C) 00:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.