User talk:Scythe/Guild Rant

Interesting. 05:18, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * The moral of the story? There is no moral to this story, it's just meant to scare you into behaving.--Łô√ë [[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg|Roar.]]îğá†ħŕášħ is hosting a Card Creation Contest!  05:52, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

"If your going to give officers flak, honestly, prepare the damn argument first." The irony. It is overwhelming. - Auron 06:04, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

points to think about
Some points of the rant that I feel could use more work/thought: Note: whoever takes half an hour reading the rant should not be considered literate; who spends no time thinking about it when it concerns them should not be considered wise. -- ◄mendel► 08:47, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * officers are being trusted - with what?
 * "I don't like what your doing now" is first and foremost a statement about the person saying this. Being able to say this is a show of trust. Yes, it has downsides. Can you react to it better than Wikia does?
 * How can you bring about an argument that you feel is lacking? Whose job is it?
 * "personal attack" is rarely held a matter of intent (though culpability is). It is hard to distinguish from personal criticism. See also wikipedia:Wikipedia:NPA.
 * "act like an eight year old" is a personal attack.
 * "Furthermore: some officers" -- this situation is not about them, it's about you, and this looks like an attack out of spite. This section works against you. (I've heard it recommended to not do that when you're quitting a RL job.) If you intended it to not be that, it needed more work.
 * "I'm aware that my officership wouldn't last and that I don't make the best officer." -- your tone says you're pissed off nonetheless - if you thought you weren't a good officer, why didn't you resign (see "trust")?