User talk:Corsaire/Closed Cases

Closed cases.. :)

Display problems
See Software_and_technical_issues/Bugs. --Rainith 05:05, 17 December 2006 (CST)


 * Yawp! Perform a "search", but found nothing, didn't know about this page, all my apologies.. :$ Corsaire 05:10, 17 December 2006 (CST)


 * Look in the support box on the left. :)  Anyway, if changing your skin to MonoBook doesn't work, post the problem in the bug page.  Everyone I've talked to about the display problems after Fyren deleted the GameWikis skin has had their problems fixed by doing that.  --Rainith 05:12, 17 December 2006 (CST)


 * The support page link lead me to the page you've deleted.. :$
 * But Yes, changiong to Monobook solve the problem (as far as I can see).. thanx.. Corsaire 05:15, 17 December 2006 (CST)


 * added: except the main page, looking still 'old style'.. Corsaire 05:17, 17 December 2006 (CST)


 * Bizarre, it goes to the page I linked to for me. I don't know, it's 2am for me, I'm going to bed now.  :)  --Rainith 05:18, 17 December 2006 (CST)
 * Edit conflict. Try clearing your cache on the main page?  I don't know. :(  --Rainith 05:18, 17 December 2006 (CST)


 * So, have a good night (11:30 AM for my, just get up.. ;) ) And yes, it seems that the IE cache wasn't fully replaced.. force it, and got it.. thanx.. ;) Corsaire 05:20, 17 December 2006 (CST)

Welcome Blithe
Well thanks buddy! u are fast :P


 * Héhé.. can't have missed you honestly.. Feel free to contact users and/or look at source page to know how things works.. ;) Corsaire 08:52, 21 December 2006 (CST)

Custom signature help
One thing that you should note. The maximum image height allowed is 19 pixels, but your icon is currently 29 pixels high. It should also redirect to your user page or talk page. Thanks in advance! -- (talk) 16:14, 1 January 2007 (CST)


 * The image is corrected.. moved after the pseudo.. and still linking to my page.. thanx for the advice.. ;) Corsaire  [[image:Corsaire_Signature.gif]] 06:10, 2 January 2007 (CST)

Hey man. I'm glad to have helped, and thanks for crediting me!
 *  ViperBlade  Talk!!

Nice
I love the Dune reference. I wonder if there is a Muad'dib in Guild Wars, seeing as that we now have our own sandwurms.. Marstfu 14:50, 11 January 2007 (CST)
 * Thanx... and yes, I saw an Usul Of Arrakis (click to see) ;) But no picture of me and a worm.. :s Corsaire  [[image:Corsaire_Signature.gif]] 16:44, 11 January 2007 (CST)

Removal of delete tags
Articles with little to no information are worse than red links. A red link says we need that content. Also, the delet tag says : DO NOT REMOVE IF YOU ARE THE AUTHOR, &mdash;Blastedt&mdash; 12:12, 27 January 2007 (CST)


 * So what's the purpose of the stub categories???
 * And if everyone have not enough informations, no one will start the article, but every people with little informations can make a complete article, but if no one starts it..
 * So explain me what I should do.. &mdash; Corsaire  [[image:Corsaire_Signature.gif]] 12:15, 27 January 2007 (CST)
 * Wait until you actually have skills, profession, and species, not to mention more details. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 12:18, 27 January 2007 (CST)
 * So.. delete them if you want.. &mdash; Corsaire  [[image:Corsaire_Signature.gif]] 12:19, 27 January 2007 (CST)
 * Well, I'm neither for or against the deletion of the articles, but Blastedt, try to remain a bit more civil please...it's not like having the article around is a serious blight on the Wiki or anything. -.- Entropy 12:30, 27 January 2007 (CST)
 * Sorry if I seemed rude, didnt mean to be :'( &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 12:31, 27 January 2007 (CST)
 * Note: The reverts on the Commander Lohgor and Commander Gituhr articles are multiple violations of GW:1RV by both User:Blastedt AND by User:Corsaire.
 * On the delete tags for these two articles - basically, they currently show little more than their location and a picture. Blastedt is right that we usually prefer red links to indicate that information is needed, rather than a blue link with little to no information.  Per GW:DID, I'm leaving the articles up for now; but we really should have at least a profession and species added - and ideally at least one of the skills they use, if not the whole SoC.  --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 13:03, 27 January 2007 (CST)
 * Sorry *pouts* &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 13:06, 27 January 2007 (CST)


 * Tought that every information even partial where welcome.. won't do that mistake again and get more inforamtion as I can in the futur..
 * ps: (can you be more clearer than red wins in a ban's reason? Or explain it in the user's talk? This could avoid confusion between a good reason and vandalism) &mdash; Corsaire  [[image:Corsaire_Signature.gif]] 14:04, 27 January 2007 (CST)
 * I had red vs blue: red wins originally, but I was too lazy to type it out again when you removed the tag. &mdash;[[Image:BlastedtSigleft.jpg]]Blastedt[[Image:BlastedtSigright.jpg]]&mdash; 18:34, 27 January 2007 (CST)