User talk:84.136.206.220

Hi there, you may want to read GW:1RV :) &mdash; Skuld 13:40, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

No I dont! But your offer kind of forced me to read it. :P 84.136.206.220 13:43, 7 September 2006 (CDT)


 * Bwaha! My mind controlling powers > you &mdash; Skuld 13:44, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

I knew it! You're from teh CIA! I knew what you did @MKULTRA!84.136.206.220 13:49, 7 September 2006 (CDT)

Note: 1RV does not apply to a revert with no explanation, which is what Fyren did. See the "exception" section in GW:1RV. zaishen 14:18, 7 September 2006 (CDT)
 * If you want to get technical about it, what Fyren did was a rollback, not a revert. Which may leave both rules out of the picture entirely... --Bishop 14:25, 7 September 2006 (CDT)
 * There is no technical difference. A rollback is a revert done by an admin using a special MediaWiki facility, but not using any specific admin-only powers. zaishen 14:28, 7 September 2006 (CDT)
 * I realise this, but it does prevent the inclusion of an explanation for the edit, making it impossible to comply with 1RV. Which means that if taken litterally, the exception in 1RV invalidates admin rollbacks (or rather, robs them of the protection afforded regular reverts, contrary to the spirit of 1RV). --Bishop 14:34, 7 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Ah, I get you now. Fine. Though I think Fyren should have left a message in some relevant talk page, though I see that he has explained himself the build's talk page now and I accept his rationale. zaishen 14:36, 7 September 2006 (CDT)