User talk:Nemren

Nice work today, Nemren, you've been busy :) 148.177.129.213 00:18, 7 Oct 2005 (EST)


 * Glad to see you picked up the stuff on the energy skills and ran with it. That was some stuff I was hoping to get to eventually (and eventually a master page attempting to compare various energy management skills, but boy that's a big one).  Glad to see someone else is both interested and helping out above and beyond any meager stuff I'd done. --JoDiamonds 22:05, 16 June 2006 (CDT)

Build Approval
''what are you doing? there isn't 3 more favoured votes than unfavoured'' Rapta I'm sorry, i looked here and here and couldn't find an agreement. While looking through the builds section, numerous builds don't match the unstub points. --Nemren 18:13, 21 July 2006 (CDT)
 * For approval, there has to be distinctly 3 more votes for the build than against it. The author's vote usually only counts when there is clearly unanimous support for the build, and no (or very few) comments are posted against the build. On the other hand, when a build is voted Unfavoured, it usually just needs around 3 more votes against it than for it, (2 when the build is obviously crap). Just to clear things up for ya &mdash; Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 18:41, 21 July 2006 (CDT)

Eep
Whoops, didn't see the message. Apologies, I didn't mean to ignore you or anything. >_< --Kit Engel 11:12, 28 August 2006 (CDT)
 * np. i'll try again ;-) --Nemren 11:54, 28 August 2006 (CDT)

warning
Talk:N/any Icy Degen

Becareful next time, because if it happens again there'll be a ban. - 12:45, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * What the hell? We're not ANet.  I am 100% opposed to the deletion of the page and restoration of an earlier revision, let alone saying you'll ban.  --Fyren 16:02, 13 September 2006 (CDT)
 * PanSola is right, i made a mistake, i bear the consequences. --Nemren 16:08, 13 September 2006 (CDT)