User talk:68.142.14.61

Talk:Critical hit
nope, that time i was replying to User:AOTT --Honorable Sarah 19:12, 17 August 2006 (CDT)
 * No, you replied to me. Indent properly.  --68.142.14.61 20:04, 17 August 2006 (CDT)
 * it looks strange to reply on the same indent, especially with long comments
 * i change the indent on every comment. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 21:06, 17 August 2006 (CDT)
 * That's not how it's accepted you comment on a wiki. You indent above the comment you're replying to. --68.142.14.61 21:13, 17 August 2006 (CDT)
 * it makes everything illegible that way. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 21:14, 17 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I seriously doubt that every wiki follows the same rules. --Rainith 21:20, 17 August 2006 (CDT)
 * This discussion with it's terrible indentation shows why I'm afraid the anon is correct, one should always indent in one from the post they're replying to, illegible is bad but incomprehensible is worse. The only exception is then there is a long discussion which is into it's 10th indent or so, one can restart with no indentation for legibilty. --Xasxas256 21:25, 17 August 2006 (CDT)

It's not so much a rule as the way that makes sense. Since this isn't a flat forum you indent rather than quote who you respond to. --68.142.14.61 22:38, 17 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I was probably a bit blunt, I was in a hurry to get to soccer, but I still firmly believe in correct indentation. Sorry Sarah if I was a bit curt but if everyone else follows the normal "indent in once for a reply" except you, then there's bound to be more confusion in the future. --Xasxas256 22:58, 17 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Ah, but not everyone follows it. Even if we made a rule for it, we would still have lots and lots of people not following it, sort of like speed limits...  --Rainith 23:01, 17 August 2006 (CDT)