Talk:Kilroy Stonekin

I think we should just link to some page on the web that recounts the incident. I also think the incident was a fake. --Karlos 15:58, 10 Sep 2005 (EST)

Ok, this is confusing.. Today I ran by Kilroy and his first name (in Grenth's Footprint) was "Killroy" likewise the quest log listed him as "Killroy," last night (and even in the screen cap) his name was "Kilroy" with one L. Does he change names from outside to inside? Did they update his name? --Karlos 20:44, 11 Sep 2005 (EST)

Paladin is completely unnecessary: a) In classical categorizations, Paladins are Warriors. b) In that clip, him being a Paladin is irrelevant. c) The term Paladin for Guild Wars players is of almost no value. The class does not exist and W/Mo is not really a paladin. d) Leroy Jenkins in MMORPG lore is about dumb warriors not specifically dumb paladins. --Karlos 22:46, 4 Oct 2005 (EST)


 * It'd say he epitomizes a "dumb player" and it had nothing to do with classes. --Fyren 22:52, 4 Oct 2005 (EST)


 * Sure, but in GW, it is such that really only warriors "rush in." Everyone else pokes at things with their wands/bows/staves. There is no Druid Shapeshifter or Fighting Cleric or a Bard Skald. I miss true D&D. *sniff* --Karlos 23:06, 4 Oct 2005 (EST)
 * Haha. I changed it to paladin, referring to the WoW meaning of the term. WoW Paladins are very different to warriors in that they get many shields and wear good armour, so they are the most survivable class in the game. This attracts alot of younger players to the class, and they often behave recklessly. There is no real comparison in GW as, in my experience, you can't really draw generalisations about the player from their choice of class. However since the note was there, I decided to correct it, calling it a warrior is different imho. If you dont think it should be labelled paladin, then perhaps it should simply be "players"? --Hewus 00:03, 6 Oct 2005 (EST)