Talk:Mistrust

Guilt is so much better, there's barely any reason to pick mistrust over it! --User:Aptaleon Griefhaven
 * Beside the 50% faster recharge? Why not take both! --Theeth (talk)   20:32, 29 September 2006 (CDT)
 * Skill description should really say 'All nearby foes'... (Terra Xin 09:18, 6 October 2006 (CDT))


 * It means to say, all nearby allies of that foe. --Karlos 11:31, 6 October 2006 (CDT)
 * And the way it says it is consistent with Guilt and Shame.&mdash;Aranth 20:47, 6 October 2006 (CDT)

Well this is more of a pve version of guilt, it seems not bad @ about 80 reliable damagePhool 03:37, 24 October 2006 (CDT)

Am I the only one who found the "clarification" note far more confusing than the actual in-game skill text? @_@;; Arshay Duskbrow 07:16, 8 January 2007 (CST)
 * Maybe this is better now?&mdash;Aranth 23:47, 12 January 2007 (CST)
 * The notes are still dumb. -.- I wanna remove them but they've been there for awhile... [[Image:Entrophic Sig.jpg]] (T/C) 23:31, 17 February 2007 (CST)
 * Ya, the note is kind of redundant. The description isn't confusing. --NYC Elite 16:27, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Removed the note. Was completely useless. If you're going to put something in Notes, make it useful. Leina 04:58, 27 March 2007 (CDT)
 * Honestly, I've always had some confusion with this and Guilt vs. Shame. It's just that the wording can be read two ways; either how it actually happens, or: "target foe casts a Spell that targets a foe [i.e. YOUR foe, meaning healing or prot spells]."  In the description ANet basically changes the perspective mid-sentence, which is what was confusing.  I think I got it now, though.--Mafaraxas 23:04, 10 April 2007 (CDT)