Talk:Uw

I don't see why it shouldn't exist. Wiki isn't paper. And if you click 'Go' on 'Uw', it'll now redirect to Underworld. Handy. Shandy 22:50, 7 March 2006 (CST)

UW.. 22:58, 7 March 2006 (CST)


 * Did somebody fix the 'Go' button? Before it would only take you to the correct page if you use the correct capitalisation. So using 'Go' on 'uw', 'Uw', 'uW' and 'UW' would all lead to different pages. Shandy 23:02, 7 March 2006 (CST)


 * Actually, the capitalization of the very first letter of an article name does not matter. uW and UW will take you to the same article. -- 23:40, 7 March 2006 (CST)


 * Yes, wiki isn't paper, but we do pay a lot of attention to what we name things. If uw is allowed, so should hoh, sf, gf, la, droks, and dozens of other lowercased acronyms. Do you think we should redirect all of them to the appropriate places just to make the searches better? I see that fow already exists. 23:03, 7 March 2006 (CST)
 * I think finding things in this wiki is actually one of our weaknesses, to be honest, but it's hard to test this. Shandy 23:43, 7 March 2006 (CST)

Unless they're all in a maintained list i'm against most redirects, they're horrible to find and can lead to lazyness, this link doesn't work on a page so lets redirect it instead of fixing 23:08, 7 March 2006 (CST)