User talk:Solus

User:Solus/Archive1 User:Solus/Archive2 User:Solus/Archive3 User:Solus/Archive4

New page
Discuss.

Image uploading
Thank you for uploading your images. GuildWiki takes copyright very seriously, and the images you have supplied may be missing information on its copyright status. You will be deleted after 7 days, unless you have a better one. If you conutine to breached this code, you will be here by ordered by Roflcopter to slap yourself with a big trout, thankyou for understanding. &mdash;Sig mA  07:32, 13 May 2007 (CDT)

Shit, I've been found at! Get him Oink! Die Sigm@ Die! Solus  07:44, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
 * 'Oink Oink' &mdash;Sig mA [[Image:Sigm@Oo.gif|19px]] 07:47, 13 May 2007 (CDT)

Boo
Saw you in Urgoz ;p &mdash; Skuld 03:27, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

I saw you in Urgoz, how ironic! Solus  03:42, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

Elemental Swords...
Ok, you need to slow down and stop cussing and cursing at the policy. There exists such a thing as an article existing on the wiki that contains information you disagree with which you can't do something about.

Now, why are you saying the information is "false"? Do you understand the difference between "We don't have proof that the information is correct" and "We have proof the information is wrong"? There's a BIG difference. You keep arguing that the wiki should not have wrong information, but you CANNOT possibly prove that Sandstorm Crags do NOT drop Elemental unless you're the developer in ANet who programmed the drops. Right?

You cannot "prove" that a creature does NOT drop a drop. This is why we ask the opposite, that people prove that a creature DOES drop the drops.

So, stop arguing that the information is wrong. I would also suggest you drop that particular discussion because I will not lift your ban next time someone bans you for acting like that. --Karlos 17:58, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

I have stopped, but you lifted the ban? So he banned me for longer than a day? Solus  01:55, 16 May 2007 (CDT)


 * I don't know. When you told me about it, I checked the incidents and decided to lift your ban. It was still in effect when I checked. Don't know if it was still under 24 hours. --Karlos 15:21, 16 May 2007 (CDT)

I thought it was orginally a 24hour ban, but I think I asn't ban untill after 24hours by yo, o well w/e :) Solus   01:46, 17 May 2007 (CDT)