GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Gares Redstorm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Gares Redstorm (talk &bull; contribs)
Gares Redstorm has more PvE accounts than several users on the GuildWiki combined. I doubt there's any aspect of the PvE game for which he cannot make authoritative statements. He is one of our most active Special:Recentchanges watchers and has collected the scalps of several vandals. He never sleeps. &mdash; Stabber &#x270d; 15:46, 3 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I'm honored for the nomination and accept. And I sleep some...every Tuesday and Thursday for 2 hours a night. ;) --Gares Redstorm 16:33, 3 June 2006 (CDT)

Support

 * 1) 85.31.186.86 00:46, 4 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 2) &mdash; Skuld   17:37, 3 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 3) -- Fenris  [[Image:FenrisPaw.jpg]] 18:58, 3 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 4) -- Markild [[Image:Markild_sig.gif]] 18:59, 3 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 5) -- Vyral 10:52, 4 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 6) --Chrono traveller 13:45, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 7) &mdash; 130.58 (talk) ( 18:48, 5 June 2006 (CDT) )
 * 8) Support It took me a bit longer to add my support to this RFA because although Gares is very active I haven't really caught up with him yet, I think because he doesn't involve himself in talk pages discussions as much as some. Part of the work of an admin should be to help others out I think. However our admins shouldn't be confining themselves to discussions, adding new content is important too so I'm still definately voting support. But it would be nice if Gares made himself a little more visable perhaps. That said, having admins of varying styles is a good thing anyway. I on longer have any reservations on that front, Gares is now one of the GuildWiki's most visible contributors. --Xasxas256 22:37, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 9) Aratak 23:04, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 10) Tetris L [[Image:TurningL sml.gif|Tetris L]] 07:56, 6 June 2006 (CDT)
 * 11) --Bishop (rap|con) 06:47, 8 June 2006 (CDT) Does not get bent out of shape by disagreement and cares about the wiki. I support.
 * 12) -Auron [[Image:Elit Druin.jpg|||My Talk]]  00:09, 22 June 2006 (CDT) Heh, go for it, Gares
 * 13) Always see him on. &mdash;  Rapta  [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] (talk|contribs) 23:45, 13 July 2006 (CDT)
 * 14) If more admins are needed, I support this user. This vote of support does not mean I currently think we need more admins. Tanaric 07:29, 18 July 2006 (CDT)
 * 15) Support Wow, I hadn't realized that I had missed adding my support - Gares has a fantastic record with the wiki and will make a good choice for when another admin is added. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:28, 8 August 2006 (CDT)

Oppose

 * 1) (your vote here)

Neutral

 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.