Talk:Competitive Mission (Factions)

There isn't much here, and it isn't of the highest quality either; I just made the wording better. If anyone could help, it would be appreciated. Alreajk 17:08, 12 March 2007 (CDT)

I've improved the quality, as well as the accuracy of the data. But there isn't a great deal to say about these missions that isn't already said in the Specific mission articles themselves. Ckal Ktak 15:56, 14 March 2007 (CDT)

Mabey we should include builds? Its not typicly done, but it would beef up the article and shed light on strategys to win these things

Again, that info is for the specific mission articles themselves if at all, not here. --Ckal Ktak 09:42, 7 April 2007 (CDT)

I Corrected the erronous statement that players make teams of 8 outside the missions. Sword.wind. 23:14, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

I added a Paragraph on why the missions ar used, as that is a question many people i know have. I'm not sure if it's formatted right, so help is appreciated.--Firebird76 10:36, 16 April 2007 (CDT)

I cleaned up, well, most of it. Fixed spelling, removed redundant information, made the formatting consistent, changed awkward phrasings, etc. Hashmir 15:05, 28 May 2007 (CDT)

The article currently states that the recently added Kurzick/Luxon skills (see June 15th, 2007 game update) cannot be used in the competitive missions, has this been confirmed? --Wolfie (talk|contribs) 20:22, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
 * They cant be used in PVP period.-- Thelordofblah 22:14, 1 July 2007 (CDT)
 * You can not use any of the new PVE (notice the E ;) in any of the current PvP Arenas. Cookieaddictedmonster 22:04, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

I don't know what the original entry looked like, but the current version is too information dense. There are too few sentences conveying too much information. Simpler sentence structures would be better (particularly with 7 other article references within the first sentence). You're assuming that the reader understands those other entries and how they pertain to this entry. This is almost one of those dictionary entries that defines a word by referring back to itself. In this case I think we're going to find that "more is better".-- Sabardeyn 12:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)