Category talk:Unfavored builds

Wait a minute. I would think that to put the article here, it would have to be voted here or gone through some process. Otherwise, use Joe Schmoe will come and move it out again. --Karlos 00:37, 14 May 2006 (CDT)
 * Yes. The progression for status would be New -> Stub -> Untested -> if vote succeeds: Tested, if vote fails: Unfavored. That's the whole idea. --Bishop (rap|con) 00:46, 14 May 2006 (CDT)

I think it would be good to write why the builds are unfavored.
 * Look at the build's talk pages --KittySoft 08:18, 15 June 2006 (CDT)

200+
we now have over 200 unfavored builds. we have more unfavored builds then tested. time to delete some? --Honorable Sarah 10:10, 25 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I think it is too easy to favor and to unfavor a build, nevertheless, it passes, easely, more unnoticed to unfavor a build without, actually, testing it, than to favour a build without, actually, testing it, and this is why there are much more unfavored builds than other. I have made just one build and I find that it is being unfavored without a proper reason for it; anyone may be give a vote, even those who have not tested it. So I suggest to still keep testing unfavored builds and keep giving votes to them... and if favorable votes come to out number unfavorable then move again the build back to untested or move it to tested. Still more, as some builds are unfavored just because they have some similarity with another and not becuase they were missconceived, and there may be relevant discussion on them, I suggest to add links in the articles of a build to related builds without regard to which section they are in.--mariano 05:37, 3 September 2006 (CDT)
 * I encourage you to vote on both tested and unfavoured &mdash; Skuld 05:50, 3 September 2006 (CDT)