User talk:Leonim

Templates for related skills
Hey Leonim, I noticed what you're doing to some of the skills (creating these groups of skill types for related skills) and I would like to suggest that you propose this in the Style and Formatting section first. I am personally opposed to it, as is Fyren apparently, and I think that such a change to ALL skills should be discussed first. No? --Karlos 08:01, 27 September 2006 (CDT)


 * Sure, I will post the proposal in the mentionned talk article. Thanks for the information, I've only seen the main article about formatting related skills, was not aware about a controversy about them.
 * Actually, I think they are mostly out-dated... and that without templates, you won't be able to keep them afloat... but that's an opinion. --Leonim 08:05, 27 September 2006 (CDT)


 * I may add that related skills won't be there for all skills, but just for those who are exotic enough not to fit a more classic category (shout, chant, lead attack... and so on). --Leonim 08:08, 27 September 2006 (CDT)


 * Aye, but that is a very subjective classification to begin with. If you're only doing it for a few skills, then just add the related skills in the few skill articles. No need for templates and includes. This is what I am opposing. --Karlos 08:10, 27 September 2006 (CDT)


 * The fact is that you may be opposed to the subjective part, but i'm wondering how you can be opposed to the templates, since related skills do exist already and are not consistent with each other through the articles.
 * I insist on the facts that a categorisation like is just a name put on the related skills that were already existing (yet missing elements depending on the last time someone bothered updating them). --Leonim 08:17, 27 September 2006 (CDT)