GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/User:Warwick

Warwick (talk &bull; contribs)
Some may think that I havn't been here long enough, but I've been here a fair while, and I know a fair bit about wikicoding, and have made quite a lot of contributions. Admittedly, I have had a few arguments, but still, havn't we all? After seeing Jijoru rfa, I decided I'd try as well. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

 * 1) weak support Good contribs, but a little spammy. RT  | Talk  19:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh, =P. Yeah, but RT.. Only a bit? --[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] Warwick (Talk)/(Contr. ) 19:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) While an OK guy, I don't think  you will be a good admin. Kicking up your number of contributions with spam does not make you have a lot of good contributions. Quality, not quantity. I don't know if kicking up your number of contributions for the sake of it is your intention but it feels like that to me. I for one don't think you're up for the job, but don't take it personally ;) --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] -- talkpage 21:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Well, you've certainly been here long enough, but like Progger said, 1,425 contribs to User talk: namespace with only 309 mainspace edits.--[[Image:Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg]] (Talk) (Contr.) 21:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)