GuildWiki talk:Sandbox

/Archive 1

I will just be reverting stuff that overwrites the notice, it's clear enough :( &mdash; Skuld 12:15, 6 August 2006 (CDT)

This article should be moved back to Sandbox to preserve the history. The page currently there needs to either be (re)made into a redirect to here (otherwise this can't be moved over it) or deleted (which is the other way to allow the move). --68.142.14.39 19:21, 12 August 2006 (CDT)
 * I meant the article, not the talk page. --68.142.14.39 19:50, 12 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Um, what is the point to preserving the history of the sandbox? I'm genuinely curious, not trying to be flippant.  --Rainith 19:53, 12 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Because whatever build article it got moved to now has the history. Having a permanent history of edits is part of the purpose of a wiki, even if the article happens to be a testing grounds.  --68.142.14.39 20:01, 12 August 2006 (CDT)
 * To prevent stuff like that from happening, can we improve the notice to say "Please do not move this page."? --Vortexsam 21:23, 12 August 2006 (CDT)
 * Protected the page from being moved by anyone other than Admins. Restored the history FWIW, of course now the history of the build page is wrong since I had to just copy+paste from here, but I guess the sandbox's history is more important than an article's. /sarcasm  --Rainith 22:06, 12 August 2006 (CDT)
 * the idea that the history of a throw-away testing space is more important then a main namespace article is an amusing one. --Honorable Sarah [[image:Honorable_Icon.gif]] 13:22, 13 August 2006 (CDT)

Builds
Can we post builds here first so we dont get yelled at for posting a probably sucky build? I have one :P I dunno if it is though.

Sooo...If anyone wants to see I'll PM / post it, as I'm pretty sure the sandbox talk page isn't appropriate.

Blastedt 18:19, 13 October 2006 (CDT)
 * Anyone can put almost anything they want in the sandbox, but it might not stay there for long. --Fyren 20:09, 13 October 2006 (CDT)