User talk:Rainith

Unique items
Any change requests for the Unique items list page go here.

We have to add Kepkhet's Refuge, added with the March 2, 2006 update. -- 18:18, 3 March 2006 (CST) Done.

Minor thing: In the greens section, it seemed a common arrangement for spellcaster greens to go "wand, focus, staff", but Bortak's section doesn't follow that convention like everything else in there currently. Done (Thanks Karlos).

Policy for capitalisation
I see you deleted the page "Galen trask". Is there some official policy on capitalisation? I always think that it is a good idea to have such redirects, because if you just type "galen trask" into the search box and hit enter, MediaWiki will ask you if you want to create an article called "Galen trask", rather than taking you to the correct article.

It does really annoy me sometimes, maybe just because I am lazy. But I would never actually link to an article such as Galen Trask without the proper capitalisation.

Just wondered if there was some official policy page on this, since my queries about policies tend to go unanswered (see e.g. Template_talk:Item begin. Kidburla 06:47, 17 February 2006 (CST)
 * I couldn't give you the page (I'd try the Style and formatting pages, it might be there), but in general the decision was made to not bother with redirects for all the different ways things can be CaPiTiLiZeD. On a personal note (and this may sound harsher than I intend it to, so as a disclaimer, no offense is meant to anyone), if you can't bother to capitalize correctly when you're punching the keys for a search, we shouldn't make life any easier for you, because you've had it way too easy already.  (Again, not directed at you or anyone else in particular, just people in general).  --Rainith 10:42, 17 February 2006 (CST)
 * It's just quicker to type in lower case, that's all. Wikipedia tends to make redirects for people who type in lower case (e.g. "Guild wars -> Guild Wars"). It really doesn't take up much space on the server (less than a KB per entry, I would think), and it just makes things easier for everyone. And it's not every single CapItIliZATion, it's just literally a completely lower case article to redirect to the correct place (apart of course from the initial upper case character which is mandatory and case-insensitive anyway). Kidburla 07:15, 22 February 2006 (CST)


 * Here is the issue you would run into, from the Main Page: We are currently maintaining 4,475 articles...  Creating 4500 redirects is not a viable solution.  Yes, I know not all the articles have multiple words in their titles.  So, say cut the number in half, 2200 redirects doesn't look that good either.  --Rainith 07:25, 22 February 2006 (CST)


 * Isn't it possible, though, to simply disable the destinction between caps in article names in Mediawiki? I believe so. In my opinion, articles should of course be created with correct capitalization, but it should not be required for a simple search. Remember, not all users are native english speakers and may not know how to correctly capitalize titles. --Bishop 09:13, 28 February 2006 (CST)


 * There may be a way to set that in MediaWiki, if so I don't know how and probably don't have access to it. That would be something to take up with Gravewit or Nunix.  As for people who are non-native english speakers, we have lots of them on the wiki, many of them long time members, they don't seem to have a problem with it.  And in what language are proper names not capitalized (with the exception of Asian languages that use a characters for words as opposed to letters)?
 * If anyone feels that the current way the wiki handles the capitalization of articles and the use of redirects, they should post somewhere that many people are likely to see it and comment, like Talk:Main Page. I'm not making the law, just trying to uphold it.  --Rainith 09:45, 28 February 2006 (CST)

Question about blocked...
(edit: block in question... I guess it expires in 3 hours anyway)
 * 19:09, 28 January 2006, Rainith blocked 68.229.231.220 (expires 19:09, 28 February 2006) (contribs) (Vandalism)

On Jan. 28th, my IP (then, and until 5min ago 68.229.231.220) was blocked for a period of 1 month (and since I'm on cable modem, it stays the same) however mysteriously today, while playing GuildWars it lost connection and then reconnected with a different IP. The reasoning behind this was Vandalism, for creating a page(NOT editing an existing one) with a 'random mishmatch of skill descriptions' based on easily placing the signets on one page (see Glyphs) However, this was not my intention and I've been unable to get ahold of anyone here via email (the one I found, at least, has not responded).

Here's the thing: I hit Save Page instead of Show Preview, and while working to correct the errors, my IP was blocked. Further still, the reason for the errors was a either a mistake in spelling (Signet of Judgement rather than Signet of Judgment) or an error in Wiki's formatting engine (copied from Glyphs, thusly like, I formatted the signets likewise:  as that is what I used as a template). This produced rather unexpected results... instead of a nice small table listing a short description of the skills, it copied the entire article from each skill (I'd listed every Signet skill) onto the same page. Although, now that I think about it I might have forgotten to include the table tags.

Before I made any changes, however, I'd like clear things up before doing *anything* as technically I'm supposed to still be blocked.


 * I vaguely remember this... Ok, went back and looked at it. You have my apologies as it sounds like you were actually trying to do something and not just screwing around, but when I saw the page you created, I'm not sure what I was supposed to think.  Here is just what the Table of contents looked like:

* 1 Description * 2 Acquisition * 3 Description * 4 Progression * 5 Acquisition * 6 Notes * 7 Usage Notes * 8 Usage Notes * 9 Acquisition * 10 Related Skills * 11 Description * 12 Progression * 13 Acquisition * 14 Notes * 15 General Description * 16 Usage * 17 Acquisition * 18 Capturing Elite Skills * 19 Capturing Non-Elite Skills o 19.1 Capturing Quest-Reward-Skills o 19.2 Capturing Skill-Trainer-Skills * 20 Description * 21 Progression * 22 Acquisition * 23 Usage Notes * 24 Description * 25 Acquisition * 26 Usage Notes * 27 Description * 28 Acquisition * 29 Usage * 30 Description * 31 Progression * 32 Acquisition * 33 Usage Notes
 * In the future, if something like hitting Save page instead of Show preview happens, make another small edit (delete/add a word) and put in the summary that you are working on the article. As for how to get yourself unblocked, check most of the admin's user pages, like mine and you will see the characters that admin plays.  You would not be the first person to contact me in-game from the wiki (you wouldn't even be the first person I had banned to do so).  --Rainith 10:02, 28 February 2006 (CST)

Aeroele
Thanks, that guy was really offensive. What a jerk. Shandy 21:33, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * NP, that's what I'm here for. :)  --Rainith 21:33, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * That was quick work Shandy. You beat me to the chase at every turn. :P I guess this happens a lot. --Gares Redstorm 21:39, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * You can't read? More likely the original person can't spell.  Not that I'm one to talk....  --Rainith 21:41, 28 February 2006 (CST)
 * Hmm... a thought: it seems like almost every vandalism happens when someone edits a section by pressing the edit box over that section, rather than modifying the whole article by hitting the edit tab. Seeing someone edit multiple sections of the same article in order especially. Not sure if anyone's commented on this being a pattern before, but I just finally noticed it after several months of being on the wiki--130.58 21:44, 28 February 2006 (CST)

Not the *first* mistake I made today...
Just the worst (appologies for the (level 11) thing.. I put that as a side note and neglected to remove it.. then I went and copied the bloody layout). The Rhitt Windmelt article I posted earlier is minsnamed and a dupilicate and needs to be deleted, as I somehow overlooked Ritt Windmelt (thanks PanSola). The image, Image:Rhitt Windmelt.jpg is likewise misnamed, but the Ritt Windmelt article does not have an image, and I don't know how to go about fixing that at all. - Evil_Greven 15:17, 1 March 2006 (CST)
 * No worries and no need to apologise for an honest mistake. :)  If something needs to be deleted put the following at the beginning of the article  and I (or one of the other admins) will delete it.  As for the misnamed picture, you can either re-upload it with the correct name (and mark the old picture for deletion), or change the article to look for the misnamed picture, your choice.  Let me know if there is anything else I can help you with, but I probably won't be on much longer tonight.  --Rainith 15:24, 1 March 2006 (CST)

Item Value Entries
Need some help? Its for weapons, salvage items, and?

Are you going to remove static collector drop item values too? --Gares Redstorm 01:49, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 * It is only for articles with the template.  This is mostly because most any weapon has a value that varies (wildly in some cases) and there is no real benefit to having it there.  Skuld made a change to the template to take out the info, so there is no rush to get it out (the info that was there is gone already), just more of a housekeeping thing.  You can see the 3 templates that I took out of Eerie Staff, those are the 3 to go.  --Rainith 02:28, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 * Here is a link to the pages that this needs to be removed from. :(  --Rainith 02:33, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 * I went through all the weapons, didn't find any item values, but I did find other goodies to work on :D --Gares Redstorm 03:22, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 * You won't see them on the page, you have to look on the edit screen. I just took one out of Bone Staff.  Pretty much any one that has Item Details a small blank line and then Weapon Details will have it.  --Rainith 03:24, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 * Arrgh!! Just kidding. Alright. I'll go back through 'em then. --Gares Redstorm 03:42, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 * Should we make a list of what needs to be done and/or what has been done? I've gone through Hammers and Swords so far. At least that way no one wastes time going back over someone else. I know you, Skuld, and me have done some. --Gares Redstorm 05:28, 4 March 2006 (CST)

Here is what needs to be done. That is everything that links to the template. --Rainith 05:58, 4 March 2006 (CST)

Skill Article formatting
Do you know if a standardized skill article format been decided on? I assumed GuildWiki talk:Style & Formatting/Skills/Everything Example was the correct way, but the discussion page on it leaves it kind of open. I'd like to modify the skill articles in a more standard order, but I need to know that order if there is one - Evil_Greven 06:22, 2 March 2006
 * Honestly, since I've started here, the skill articles have been a bit of a mish-mash. For the most part I've tried to stay away from them.  The most current conversations are here: GuildWiki talk:Style and formatting/Skills, and the current standard should be here: Style and formatting/Skills, but I haven't looked to see if that is up to date or not.  (One of my future projects is to update/create the style and formatting pages.)  Current conversations seem to center on the skill box, and which icons to use.  That's about all the help I can give to you at the moment.  I'll try to look into the S&F page for skills more when I get home.  --Rainith 06:37, 2 March 2006 (CST)
 * Thanks for the info! Slightly on a tangent here, but do you know if the template that works for  and   can be applied elsewhere?  I worked a bit this afternoon on a test format that works on both Skill Boxes and Skill Lists (see User:Evil_Greven/Skill Box), and if it's possible, it'd work well for that. - Evil_Greven 12:43, 3 March 2006
 * Really haven't played with the "includes" much, so I can't help you with that. Most any of the other 'normal' contributers could probably tell you more about them than I could.  Sorry.  :(  --Rainith 12:49, 3 March 2006 (CST)
 * Hmm... question about the Progression tables... Do you think instead of the long and drawn out "Health Degeneration" that is typically used, woud "< Health" convey same meaning, as it uses the ingame display of it (via the arrow). Likewise, "Health >" for "Health Regeneration", "< Energy" for "Energy Degeneration" and "Energy > " for "Energy Regeneration" could be used if it is deemed acceptable. -- Evil_Greven 14:49, 6 March 2006
 * I think "Health Degen" and "Health Regen" would be better for most users than using . --Rainith 14:55, 6 March 2006 (CST)

Image Woes
I updated the Image:Sever_Artery.png image after testing it locally (on 64x64 format) on a page, but it doesn't seem to care that I did and remains flawed in 64x64. I noticed however that the linking to the 64x64 seems to be different. Is this a type of cache the server maintains, and if so, how does it get reset? - Evil_Greven 06:12, 8 March 2006 (CST)
 * Sorry if I'm a bit slow (getting over a cold, again, this winter has sucked), but huh? I know if you upload an image where one already exists you may need to refresh your browsers cache by holding shift and clicking the refresh button (works on IE and Firefox, not sure on other browsers).  But if that isn't what you're talking about, you'll have to try to explain it to me again (maybe using smaller words this time).  --Rainith 06:51, 8 March 2006 (CST)
 * I created a test.html file, with the same html code that GuildWiki uses to display a reduced-size image (64 pixels x 64 pixels), and the image I uploaded looked perfect there. However, when I uploaded it, there is no change.  I've reloaded the cache & even deleted it, but to no avail.  Is it still bad gradiants for anyone else? - Evil_Greven 08:56, 8 March 2006 (CST)
 * Ok, then I don't know. The image looks fine to me when it is not scaled, but if I check out the image on one of the pages that uses it scaled to a smaller size (User:Neck/build template), the image looks like @$$ again.  This is a problem that we have had with png file scaling since day one (or at least as long as I've been here, I cannot claim to have been here since day 1).  This is one of the reasons that I am for tossing these png files and going with the jpg images from the fan site kits.  --Rainith 10:41, 8 March 2006 (CST)
 * Yeah but that's what gets me... it looks fine scaled to the exact same scale on my test webpage, but not here, which doesn't make much sense in my opinion. Does the server use some form of caching for often-accessed images? :/ ( ex. /images/thumb/e/e1/Sever_Artery.png/64px-Sever_Artery.png also see User:Lunarbunny, image looks fine there)- Evil_Greven 12:23, 8 March 2006 (CST)
 * On Lunarbunny's page, the file is scaled to a different size, don't know if that might have something to do with it. As for the server caching images like that, I dunno.  I have admin level access, which means I can delete pages and ban people, but I don't really have access to the server.  That would be a question better asked of Gravewit or Nunix.  --Rainith 12:46, 8 March 2006 (CST)

Pre-Order box
You got the pre-order box already? I ordered it from Amazon and they say they will "ship" it May 2nd!! Where did you order it from? --Karlos 01:24, 9 March 2006 (CST)
 * I went to Best Buy. They've been slowly appearing at stores since the weekend.  Specifically I picked it up at the BB in Lynnwood, but I'm guessing the one in Bellevue would have them too.  Strangely enough, they weren't in the "new software" area, but just in the "online game" area.  --Rainith 01:26, 9 March 2006 (CST)
 * Is that the BB near Alderwood mall? What price have they set on it? --161.88.255.140 01:28, 9 March 2006 (CST)
 * Yes, $10. --Rainith 01:41, 9 March 2006 (CST)


 * Wow. You live nearby too! You are me! I knew it! Are you my conscience? :)
 * I am confused. The one I bought is $49, what exactly did you buy? --Karlos 02:44, 9 March 2006 (CST)
 * Karlos, on Amazon.com, did you buy "Guild Wars Factions" ($49.44), or "Guild Wars Factions Pre-sale Disk [Does not contain full game]" ($1), or the "Buy Both and save Best Value" ($49)? When Guildwars.com first linked to Amazon.com, Amazon still didn't have the pre-sale disk available.
 * Rainith, does the BB disk contain anything extra above and beyond what ArenaNet is saying is in the package? They seem to be charging quite a bit more than Amazon for the pre-buy disk. --161.88.255.140 02:50, 9 March 2006 (CST)