GuildWiki:Deleted/Deldda Kcarc talk

De-Stabber-ization..
Crack Addled, I notice you are going about much of Stabber's work in the wiki and slapping delete tags on it. Just because a user left does not mean the work is no longer supported. The work is not in the wiki in the first place BECAUSE of that user.

Welcome back by the way. I see you are back and with no less swagger than the first time. Was a pleasure doing that FoW run without, even if it was shorter than usual. :) --Karlos 17:53, 17 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Sorry, I am simply cleaning up the GuildWiki namespace. And I don't know what FoW run you are referring to. If you disagree with the deletion proposals, please take it to the relevant talk pages. Deldda Kcarc 17:58, 17 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Tagging many useful pages for deletion just makes you look stupid in my eyes. I know I'm not really diplomatic at the moment, but tagging things like Template:Dispute (Not used yet as it is was created after the last dispute) and List of skill anomalies (A very useful article) for deletion seems like you are really trying to cause damage or get revenge or something. I see you can discuss in an almost nice manner and you are also making a lot of nice work, so why don't you try to act purely in such way that it benefits the wiki. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] 19:22, 17 June 2006 (CDT)