User talk:GW-Susan

Gaze of Contempt
Please don't re-add that note, as everyone except you thinks it's not worth mentioning. --Macros 20:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Who's everyone, and why is it that the other 'combines well' worth keeping then? Completely arbitrary.  And in fact in the recent Fort Aspenwood double faction weekend, I found both Test and Gaze useful to bother the bonders that protected the gates.  Some people might not be aware of the complementary action of Test and Gaze, and isn't wiki about informing?
 * "Everyone" is all the people who discussed it on the talk page before removing it the first time. The second note is kept because Pain of Disenchantment is also a necro skill. Gaze is a 10 energy spell (not very useful for melee classes) and Test is a touch skill (not very useful for casters). Using both means you would be using 2 skills, from 2 professions, to do the same thing. Not very practical. --Macros 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

User:GW-Susan/The Rant and Fantasy Page
Nice rant - btw  will do a line

funny, all I did was a series of underscores, so there are no little breaks as between dashes (maybe Guildwiki glues dashes together, and if so, did not know before), so no extra coding for me (I did this page in notepad first, and just clipped it in) GW-Susan 15:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

so you don't need to do all that thing for a line - works better with different screen resolutions Random Time 15:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

New Section
On talk pages (and a few other pages), next to the Edit tab at the top there is a "+" tab. Click on it to create a new section. This is useful if you want to create a new section on a talk page that is long (so you don't have to scroll down), but the bigger use is it sets the right edit summary automatically, so you don't inherit the old edit summary from the previous section and thereby confusing the ppl watching RC or Watchlist d-: -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 01:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Hullo
Regarding this edit; Might want to use the talk page for that ;) --- -- (contribs)  &emsp;(talk)  19:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I took care of that edit. ComradeSanders 19:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)  -- thanks for the fix GW-Susan 20:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)