Talk:Ferry

ANet quote?
"In particular, Arena Net have indicated that charging prices for ferrying people is acceptable conduct." Can I have a quote with direct link to the source please? -- 06:39, 1 June 2006 (CDT)
 * I think this is from the Gaile talks and is by no means official. I'll remove the note. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] 06:59, 1 June 2006 (CDT)


 * The following was in the article:


 * I still think this should not be mentioned in the article. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] 07:02, 1 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Found the source here.
 * I think if we mention it in the article then we should provide the source link along with it. --[[Image:TurningL sml.gif|Tetris L]] 07:31, 1 June 2006 (CDT)


 * What's the point in mentioning it? Isn't it common sense that they are able to ask for a fee? What official allowance do thay need if it is possible? (And clearly not a bug) --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] 09:05, 1 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Our alliance runs HzH, when we first got it, people in the alliance had a fight over ferrying and whether to charge or let people in for free with opinions covering the whole gamut (Charge 10k, charge 5k faction, charge 1 amber, do it for tips, do it for free, ...). It got so bad that the alliance fell apart in two days (resurrected a couple of days later with the greedy guild left out, we got HzH now). I think it's important that people understand where ANet stands on this issue. --Karlos 09:14, 1 June 2006 (CDT)

I would greatly appreciate it if people didn't simply remove notes that they were unsure about. I added that note for a well thought out reason. You should have asked me why instead of assuming that I had no idea what I was talking about. Koyashi 09:38, 1 June 2006 (CDT)


 * You understood me wrong. I did not remove the note because I was unsure. I removed because I was and still am sure it does not conform any information. Should we also add a note to the running article 'Anet sees it fit to take payment for running services as often stated by Gaile Gray'? Imho not. Koyashi, do not revert a revert. Please discuss first. You just broke the only revert once policy of guildwiki. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] 09:48, 1 June 2006 (CDT)
 * My appologies Koyashi, it was Karlos who added the note back to the article, you only modified it after that. --[[Image:Gem-icon-sm.png]] 09:52, 1 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Let us have this discussion then. For controversial issues where Arena Net have staked out a clear position, for example with farming, running, ferrying, etc., I think we should link to all official statements that we have available. The presence or absence of official statements is often the source of numerous disputes among players. Why can't the GuildWiki keep track of the official statements so that players can simply and easily find these official statements? Koyashi 09:57, 1 June 2006 (CDT)


 * Ok, read the reverted statements and all that jazz. It doesn't matter what ANet thinks in terms of ferrying for free or for cost. Those Alliances accumulated enough faction to control those areas and they have the right to do whatever they deem fit. If ANet had a problem with what Alliances controlling these Elite areas would do in regards to letting others into them, then ANet shouldn't have made them exclusive in the first place. --Gares Redstorm 10:37, 1 June 2006 (CDT)