Talk:Everlasting Yuletide Tonic

Give me the screenshot, and I won't delete this page. Cress Arvein(Talk) 19:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Screenshot needs to be uploaded and evidense added before I get back from eating, or will be wiped RT 19:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The everlasting transmogrifier has been confirmed as real already and there is already an article on that. Delete plixplox. --[[Image:Progr.png]] -- talkpage 19:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * About that: Only the ones from Halloween and Rollerbeetle have been confirmed. Try searching it. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 19:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * (ec) 2 things: if it is real, it's either Transmogrifying OR Yuletide. Second, yuletide is spelled wrong. --Macros 19:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It would be called Everlasting Yuletide Tonic, methinks. But, that aside, we have nothing on this... --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 19:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * So either way, the name is wrong. Delete! --Macros 19:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Post the screenshot please, you can blank out names and whatnot. As long as it looks real, we'll add it (and then debate about it again :P ) and move this to a proper name and give it a good format, otherwise this page will be deleted in the near future --Gimmethegepgun 19:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete away! Yikey ∞  19:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ooops it said in my summary I voted with Cress >.< Originally I did but I changed my mind. Thought I'd leave a note to make sure my vote's considered in the right place. :) Saul Lachance 19:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Someone's selling one one High End guru here. Cropped off his screen: [[Image:Everlasting_Yuletide_Tonic_confirmation.jpg]] Jennalee 06:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Gfg me, appears to be legit. Banned from guru or I'd check it out myself.-American Wrath | Talk 06:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Since a mod nuked the original post with the screen, the original shot minus names here. Jennalee 13:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
Will be deleted/kept when majority is reached. This deletion debate has stopped, there is conformation by a regular, trusted user RT 06:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Jennalee 06:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) ok ok lol. saw that screen&mdash;&clubs; Jedi &clubs; Rogue &clubs;  06:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete

 * 1) RT 19:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Delete. When evidence is provided someone can properly formulate a page on it. Saul Lachance 19:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Name sounds like bull, and the person could have been a vandal OR it may have been an accident. As far as I know, no item on guildwars can do two things (Beer cant be drunk and drunk three times, if you see what I mean). &mdash;♥May♥ Wick♥ 19:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) delete. We can add it when the item is confirmed to exist. atm this page has no information. &mdash;&clubs; Jedi &clubs; Rogue &clubs;  02:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) [me=pwnd] Delete. Although the probability of this item being legit is existent, there is absolutely no evidence to support it. Perhaps a .dat troll can provide some insight. Just because the other two tonics are real does not mean we can safely assume that this one is as well. [\me=pwnd]-American Wrath | Talk 02:46, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Move it to a correct title when we get the screenshot. Cress Arvein(Talk) 19:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Agree with Cress. An everlasting yuletide item definitely exists, but until we know what it is actually called we can't do much. [[Image:Felix_Omni_Signature.png]] 19:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) it is a plausible item, waiting for the screenshot. No screenshot, no article. --- [[Image:VipermagiSig.JPG]]-- (s)talkpage 19:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Agreed again. I don't think it's been claimed by anyone yet, but it's something that will probably come sometime soon. Mr. Mango 02:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)