Warwick16358@legacy41698774 (talk | contribs) m (the original spam crew was actually made as an original joke, and as such there is only one of them. As is noted, almost everyone spams. Will be continued on talk.) |
Warwick16358@legacy41698774 (talk | contribs) m (Oh, dont forget that bit as well. Leaving the only slightly pointful part in.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{delete|Actually totally pointless and not an issue}} |
{{delete|Actually totally pointless and not an issue}} |
||
| − | Any organization with the intent of adding useless content to the wiki serves no purpose. Spam obscures real discussion and creates longer load times. |
||
==Individual spammers== |
==Individual spammers== |
||
Revision as of 21:09, 4 February 2008
Individual spammers
Since the line between discussion and spam can be a fine one, each potential spammer should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. A few things to look for in your evaulation might be:
- Single word posts in discussions