GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
Register
Advertisement

This article is designed to act as a portal to the various other policy pages, as well as describe the method of adding and changing GuildWiki policy.

It should be noted that the GuildWiki has only recently started writing policy articles, and thus this may be incomplete. If there are any longstanding GuildWiki traditions/procedures that remain undocumented, please write up an article and link it appropriately.

Shortcut:
GW:POLICY


Current well-established policies[]

See also: Category:Policy, Category:Archived Policies and Category:Policy proposals

Editing policies[]

These policies guide editing a page.

Conflict policies[]

These policies govern how to act when you disagree with another user.

  • Always assume good faith in the edits of others.
  • Except for vandalism, only revert once. After that, discuss any disagreements on the talk page and come to a compromise.
  • You are valuable, so please be bold in editing, regardless of how new you are here or how trivial your edits seem to be. There is no concept of seniority among editors.
  • When engaging in a conflict, no personal attacks are acceptable. Discuss the edit, not the editor.
  • Deal quietly with vandals to avoid feeding the vandals attention.
  • We are not ArenaNet. We, as an organization, do not punish for behavior that violates the Guild Wars Terms of Use.

Administrative policies[]

These policies govern how admins (aka sysops) differ from normal editors, as well as how administrators are to apply their powers.

Changing policies[]

It is perfectly acceptable to disagree with a policy. There are three steps necessary to change a policy:

  1. Add a new subarticle to the policy in question fully rewriting all sections of the policy you'd like to see change.
  2. Add a message to the talk page of the policy article advertising the change, and why that change is good for the GuildWiki.
  3. Add an entry to the top of the list in the section below linking to the policy in question as well as a brief summary of the suggested change. Please sign and date the entry!

It is very likely that your proposal will need to be edited during the proposal period. It is also likely that other GuildWikians might produce counter-proposals (each with their own subarticle). All discussions about editing individual proposals should stay within each individual subarticle's talk page. The main article's talk page should contain only a summary of each proposal (1-2 lines) and links to each proposal.

If consensus to change the policy is reached in the talk page, edit the policy in question. If consensus is not reached, no change can be made. While a vote can be called to assess community feelings about a change, no vote can ever be considered binding nor, unless unanimous, indication of consensus.

In any case, once the proposal is concluded, move it from the list of policies being revisited to the top of the recently revisited list, along with the date and outcome (success or failure). Failed policy changes on the recently revisited list should not be reproposed for some time.

Policies currently being revisited[]

  • None

Recently revisited policies[]

Proposing new GuildWiki policies[]

Proposing a new GuildWiki policy is a three-step process:

  1. Create a new article, in the GuildWiki namespace, describing your new policy. The article title should be similar in style to existing policy articles, if possible. Do not add the new article to the policy category.
  2. Add {{proposed policy}} to the proposition.
  3. Add the new article to the list below, along with a brief summary of why the policy would be helpful.
  4. Include any additional arguments as to why the proposed policy is good for the GuildWiki in the talk page of the new policy article.

If consensus to adopt the proposed policy is reached in the talk page, add the policy to the policy category. If consensus is not reached, mark the article for deletion. While a vote can be called to assess community feelings about a proposed policy, no vote can ever be considered binding nor, unless unanimous, indication of consensus.

In any case, once the proposal is concluded, remove it from the list of policies being proposed. If the policy proposal failed, add it to the top of the recently failed list, along with the date. Failed policy proposals should not be reproposed for some time.

Current proposed policies[]

  • None


Recently accepted proposals[]

Recently failed proposals[]

Advertisement