GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
(→‎Current proposed policies: Misplaced policy)
m (Rolled back edits by 188.40.105.142 (talk) to last version by Mendel)
 
(64 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
It should be noted that the GuildWiki has only recently started writing policy articles, and thus this may be incomplete. If there are any longstanding GuildWiki traditions/procedures that remain undocumented, please write up an article and link it appropriately.
 
It should be noted that the GuildWiki has only recently started writing policy articles, and thus this may be incomplete. If there are any longstanding GuildWiki traditions/procedures that remain undocumented, please write up an article and link it appropriately.
 
{{shortcut|[[GW:POLICY]]}}
 
{{shortcut|[[GW:POLICY]]}}
  +
 
== Current well-established policies ==
 
== Current well-established policies ==
  +
See also: [[:Category:Policy]], [[:Category:Archived Policies]] and [[:Category:Policy proposals]]
  +
 
=== Editing policies ===
 
=== Editing policies ===
 
These policies guide editing a page.
 
These policies guide editing a page.
Line 13: Line 16:
 
* Know when and when not to use a [[GuildWiki:redirect|redirect]].
 
* Know when and when not to use a [[GuildWiki:redirect|redirect]].
 
* The article on [[GuildWiki:Article retention|retention]] states which information is kept in the wiki.
 
* The article on [[GuildWiki:Article retention|retention]] states which information is kept in the wiki.
  +
* The [[GuildWiki:Criteria for deletion|Criteria for deletion]] state which information is to be deleted, but [[GuildWiki:don't immediately delete|don't immediately delete]] unless it's clearly vandalism or spam.
 
* Please [[GuildWiki:Sign your comments|sign your comments]] on article talk pages with non-disruptive signatures.
 
* Please [[GuildWiki:Sign your comments|sign your comments]] on article talk pages with non-disruptive signatures.
  +
* The GuildWiki community encourages users to [[GuildWiki:Be Bold|be bold]] when updating pages.
 
* Finally, recognize that [[GuildWiki:we are not Wikipedia|we are not Wikipedia]].
 
* Finally, recognize that [[GuildWiki:we are not Wikipedia|we are not Wikipedia]].
   
Line 21: Line 26:
 
* Always [[GuildWiki:assume good faith|assume good faith]] in the edits of others.
 
* Always [[GuildWiki:assume good faith|assume good faith]] in the edits of others.
 
* Except for vandalism, [[GuildWiki:only revert once|only revert once]]. After that, discuss any disagreements on the talk page and come to a compromise.
 
* Except for vandalism, [[GuildWiki:only revert once|only revert once]]. After that, discuss any disagreements on the talk page and come to a compromise.
* [[GuildWiki:You are valuable|You are valuable]], regardless of how new you are here or how trivial your edits seem to be. There is no concept of seniority among editors.
+
* [[GuildWiki:You are valuable|You are valuable]], so please [[GuildWiki:Be Bold|be bold]] in editing, regardless of how new you are here or how trivial your edits seem to be. There is no concept of seniority among editors.
 
* When engaging in a conflict, [[GuildWiki:no personal attacks|no personal attacks]] are acceptable. Discuss the edit, not the editor.
 
* When engaging in a conflict, [[GuildWiki:no personal attacks|no personal attacks]] are acceptable. Discuss the edit, not the editor.
  +
* [[GuildWiki:Quietly deal with vandals|Deal quietly with vandals]] to avoid feeding the vandals attention.
 
* [[GuildWiki:We are not ArenaNet|We are not ArenaNet]]. We, as an organization, do not punish for behavior that violates the Guild Wars Terms of Use.
 
* [[GuildWiki:We are not ArenaNet|We are not ArenaNet]]. We, as an organization, do not punish for behavior that violates the Guild Wars Terms of Use.
   
Line 31: Line 37:
 
* View current [[GuildWiki:requests for adminship|requests for adminship]].
 
* View current [[GuildWiki:requests for adminship|requests for adminship]].
 
* Sysops [[GuildWiki:administrate users, not content|administrate users, not content]]. Admins have no more say in editing disputes than normal users do.
 
* Sysops [[GuildWiki:administrate users, not content|administrate users, not content]]. Admins have no more say in editing disputes than normal users do.
  +
* The Bureaucrats can grant [[GuildWiki:rollback|rollback]] rights to editors that help fight vandals.
   
 
== Changing policies ==
 
== Changing policies ==
It is perfectly acceptable to disagree with a policy. There are two steps necessary to change a policy:
+
It is perfectly acceptable to disagree with a policy. There are three steps necessary to change a policy:
   
 
# Add a new subarticle to the policy in question fully rewriting all sections of the policy you'd like to see change.
 
# Add a new subarticle to the policy in question fully rewriting all sections of the policy you'd like to see change.
Line 46: Line 53:
   
 
=== Policies currently being revisited ===
 
=== Policies currently being revisited ===
* None at this time
+
* None
   
 
=== Recently revisited policies ===
 
=== Recently revisited policies ===
  +
* [[GuildWiki:You are valuable/Draft 1]]
 
  +
* [[GuildWiki:Image use policy/Proposal]]
*[[GuildWiki:Policy]] (proposed change: [[GuildWiki:Policy/Proposal1]]): A proposed change on proposing changes. :) —[[User:Tanaric|Tanaric]] 07:45, 14 October 2006 (CDT)
 
  +
* [[GuildWiki:Image license guide/Proposal]]
**Implemented by LordBiro, 1st Dec 2006, no opposition.
 
  +
* [[GuildWiki:Style and formatting/Images/Proposal]]
*[[GuildWiki:Redirect]]: Redirects for capitalization and plurals. —[[User:Tanaric|Tanaric]] 17:57, 5 August 2006 (CDT)
 
**Proposed revision can be viewed at [[GuildWiki:Redirect/p1]]. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 13:48, 11 December 2006 (CST)
 
**Implemented by Barek, 15th Dec 2006, no unresolved opposition posted.
 
   
 
== Proposing new GuildWiki policies ==
 
== Proposing new GuildWiki policies ==
Line 60: Line 65:
   
 
# Create a new article, in the GuildWiki namespace, describing your new policy. The article title should be similar in style to existing policy articles, if possible. Do ''not'' add the new article to the [[:Category:policy|policy]] category.
 
# Create a new article, in the GuildWiki namespace, describing your new policy. The article title should be similar in style to existing policy articles, if possible. Do ''not'' add the new article to the [[:Category:policy|policy]] category.
  +
# Add {{template|proposed policy}} to the proposition.
# Add the new article to the list below, along with a brief summary of why the policy would be helpful. Please '''sign and date''' the entry!
+
# Add the new article to the list below, along with a brief summary of why the policy would be helpful.
# Include any additional arguments as to why the propsed policy is good for the GuildWiki in the talk page of the new policy article.
+
# Include any additional arguments as to why the proposed policy is good for the GuildWiki in the talk page of the new policy article.
   
 
If consensus to adopt the proposed policy is reached in the talk page, add the policy to the policy category. If consensus is not reached, mark the article for deletion. '''While a vote can be called to assess community feelings about a proposed policy, no vote can ever be considered binding nor, unless unanimous, indication of consensus.'''
 
If consensus to adopt the proposed policy is reached in the talk page, add the policy to the policy category. If consensus is not reached, mark the article for deletion. '''While a vote can be called to assess community feelings about a proposed policy, no vote can ever be considered binding nor, unless unanimous, indication of consensus.'''
Line 68: Line 74:
   
 
=== Current proposed policies ===
 
=== Current proposed policies ===
  +
* None
'''Overall site proposals:'''
 
  +
:*[[GuildWiki:Pop culture]] - Pop culture references and what to do with them. --[[User:Nog64|Nog64]]
 
  +
<!-- '''Style and formatting guidelines:''' -->
:* [[GuildWiki:Support Guild Wars 2]] - A policy proposal to support Guild Wars 2 on GuildWiki rather than spawning a new and separate Wiki. [[User:Auntmousie|Auntmousie]] 17:55, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
 
   
  +
<!-- please leave a one line break between proposed and accepted -->
'''Build space proposals:'''
 
:* [[GuildWiki:No original builds]] ~ GuildWiki should simply document the commonplace builds, instead of acting as a development bed. &mdash; [[User:Skuld|Skuld]] 11:39, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
 
:* [[Guildwiki:Profession guides]] -- An policy that would cause a switch from a build based system to a guide based system for PvE documentation. [[User:Defiant Elements|<font color="DodgerBlue">'''Defiant Elements'''</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Defiant Elements|talk]] ~ [[Special:Contributions/Defiant Elements|contribs]])</small> 23:01, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
 
:* [[GuildWiki:Publish your build]] - A policy to organize original builds in the User namespace. --[[User:Vazze|Vazze]] 19:30, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
 
   
 
=== Recently accepted proposals ===
 
=== Recently accepted proposals ===
  +
<!-- please leave a one line break between accepted and failed -->
:* [[GuildWiki:Sign your comments/P1]]: Converted to policy Jan 15, 2006 - no outstanding opposition on talk page. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 22:02, 14 January 2007 (CST)
 
:* [[GuildWiki:We are not ArenaNet]]: Converted to policy Feb 1, 2007 - no outstanding opposition on talk page. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 14:56, 1 February 2007 (CST)
 
:* [[GuildWiki:No personal attacks]]: Converted to policy Feb 6, 2007 by [[User:Gares Redstorm]] - no outstanding opposition on talk page. &mdash;[[User:Tanaric|Tanaric]] 07:11, 6 February 2007 (CST)
 
   
 
=== Recently failed proposals ===
 
=== Recently failed proposals ===
  +
:*[[GuildWiki talk:Don't shout at each other!]] - why we get emotional, and how not to
  +
:*[[GuildWiki:Bots]] Still working out some kinks though
  +
:*[[GuildWiki:Censorship]]: guidelines for censoring on GuildWiki
  +
:*[[GuildWiki:What (not) to Delete]] another take on Censorship
  +
:*[[GuildWiki:Use Common Sense]] - Common Sense.
  +
:*[[GuildWiki:Guidelines]]
  +
:*[[GuildWiki:Comments]] - comments are protected
   
 
[[Category:GuildWiki]]
:* [[GuildWiki:Penalties for abuse|Penalties for abuse]]: no admin was interested in implementation. &mdash;[[User:Tanaric|Tanaric]] 17:57, 5 August 2006 (CDT)
 
:* [[GuildWiki:Personal sites]] - Suggests guildwiki is not for personal use. The Short policy recommends we delete ridiculously huge user sites, of which there are hundreds.
 
:: Was decided user sites would not harm the wiki under any circumstances.[[User:Spayced|Spayced]] 21:31, 17 December 2006 (CST)
 
[[Category:Policy|Policy]]
 
:* [[GuildWiki:Explain Yourself]] ~ Gathered no interest &mdash; [[User:Skuld|Skuld]] 11:40, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
 
:* [[GuildWiki:Build split]] - Gathered little interest, obsolete after [[GuildWiki:builds wipe|builds wipe]]. &mdash;[[User:Tanaric|Tanaric]] 17:07, 2 May 2007 (CDT)
 
:* [[GuildWiki:Advertise your build]] - Removed from Proposed Policies by author, in recognition of the ferocity of disagreement. [[User:Auntmousie|Auntmousie]] 17:55, 23 July 2007 (CDT)
 

Latest revision as of 15:47, 5 January 2013

This article is designed to act as a portal to the various other policy pages, as well as describe the method of adding and changing GuildWiki policy.

It should be noted that the GuildWiki has only recently started writing policy articles, and thus this may be incomplete. If there are any longstanding GuildWiki traditions/procedures that remain undocumented, please write up an article and link it appropriately.

Shortcut:
GW:POLICY


Current well-established policies[]

See also: Category:Policy, Category:Archived Policies and Category:Policy proposals

Editing policies[]

These policies guide editing a page.

Conflict policies[]

These policies govern how to act when you disagree with another user.

  • Always assume good faith in the edits of others.
  • Except for vandalism, only revert once. After that, discuss any disagreements on the talk page and come to a compromise.
  • You are valuable, so please be bold in editing, regardless of how new you are here or how trivial your edits seem to be. There is no concept of seniority among editors.
  • When engaging in a conflict, no personal attacks are acceptable. Discuss the edit, not the editor.
  • Deal quietly with vandals to avoid feeding the vandals attention.
  • We are not ArenaNet. We, as an organization, do not punish for behavior that violates the Guild Wars Terms of Use.

Administrative policies[]

These policies govern how admins (aka sysops) differ from normal editors, as well as how administrators are to apply their powers.

Changing policies[]

It is perfectly acceptable to disagree with a policy. There are three steps necessary to change a policy:

  1. Add a new subarticle to the policy in question fully rewriting all sections of the policy you'd like to see change.
  2. Add a message to the talk page of the policy article advertising the change, and why that change is good for the GuildWiki.
  3. Add an entry to the top of the list in the section below linking to the policy in question as well as a brief summary of the suggested change. Please sign and date the entry!

It is very likely that your proposal will need to be edited during the proposal period. It is also likely that other GuildWikians might produce counter-proposals (each with their own subarticle). All discussions about editing individual proposals should stay within each individual subarticle's talk page. The main article's talk page should contain only a summary of each proposal (1-2 lines) and links to each proposal.

If consensus to change the policy is reached in the talk page, edit the policy in question. If consensus is not reached, no change can be made. While a vote can be called to assess community feelings about a change, no vote can ever be considered binding nor, unless unanimous, indication of consensus.

In any case, once the proposal is concluded, move it from the list of policies being revisited to the top of the recently revisited list, along with the date and outcome (success or failure). Failed policy changes on the recently revisited list should not be reproposed for some time.

Policies currently being revisited[]

  • None

Recently revisited policies[]

Proposing new GuildWiki policies[]

Proposing a new GuildWiki policy is a three-step process:

  1. Create a new article, in the GuildWiki namespace, describing your new policy. The article title should be similar in style to existing policy articles, if possible. Do not add the new article to the policy category.
  2. Add {{proposed policy}} to the proposition.
  3. Add the new article to the list below, along with a brief summary of why the policy would be helpful.
  4. Include any additional arguments as to why the proposed policy is good for the GuildWiki in the talk page of the new policy article.

If consensus to adopt the proposed policy is reached in the talk page, add the policy to the policy category. If consensus is not reached, mark the article for deletion. While a vote can be called to assess community feelings about a proposed policy, no vote can ever be considered binding nor, unless unanimous, indication of consensus.

In any case, once the proposal is concluded, remove it from the list of policies being proposed. If the policy proposal failed, add it to the top of the recently failed list, along with the date. Failed policy proposals should not be reproposed for some time.

Current proposed policies[]

  • None


Recently accepted proposals[]

Recently failed proposals[]