Jyro X@legacy41691700 (talk | contribs) m (→Neutral) |
Auron of Neon@legacy41684287 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 3em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAA;"> |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. <span style="color: red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
||
| + | <!-- inserted with: template:rfa top --> |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| + | :'''Note: Greven went inactive''' |
||
Greven is the creator of several articles on the GuildWiki and one of our most active documenters. He came to my attention when he pretty much singlehandedly polished [[Skills by Campaign]] into shape. Since then he has shown exceptional dedication to maintaining the quality of information in the various skill and skill list pages. He is also an active watcher of [[Special:Recentchanges]] and has fought vandals on several occasions. My personal suspicion is that he never sleeps. — [[User:Stabber|Stabber]] [[User talk:Stabber|✍]] 15:42, 3 June 2006 (CDT) |
Greven is the creator of several articles on the GuildWiki and one of our most active documenters. He came to my attention when he pretty much singlehandedly polished [[Skills by Campaign]] into shape. Since then he has shown exceptional dedication to maintaining the quality of information in the various skill and skill list pages. He is also an active watcher of [[Special:Recentchanges]] and has fought vandals on several occasions. My personal suspicion is that he never sleeps. — [[User:Stabber|Stabber]] [[User talk:Stabber|✍]] 15:42, 3 June 2006 (CDT) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
#Greven is an absolutely magnificent editor, and the wiki is significantly better off for having him—however, I've seen little in the way of interactions with other users that confirms (or denies) his ability to interact as an administrator. —[[User:Tanaric|Tanaric]] 10:00, 7 August 2006 (CDT) |
#Greven is an absolutely magnificent editor, and the wiki is significantly better off for having him—however, I've seen little in the way of interactions with other users that confirms (or denies) his ability to interact as an administrator. —[[User:Tanaric|Tanaric]] 10:00, 7 August 2006 (CDT) |
||
#I share the same sentiments as Tanaric. — [[User:Jyro_X|Jyro X]] [[Image:Darkgrin.jpg|25px]] 13:22, 16 November 2006 (CST) |
#I share the same sentiments as Tanaric. — [[User:Jyro_X|Jyro X]] [[Image:Darkgrin.jpg|25px]] 13:22, 16 November 2006 (CST) |
||
| + | {{clear}} |
||
| + | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.'' |
||
| + | </div> |
||
| + | <!-- inserted with template:rfa bottom --> |
||
| + | |||
| + | <noinclude> |
||
| + | [[Category:Resolved RfAs|Evil Greven]] |
||
| + | [[Category:Failed RfAs|Evil Greven]] |
||
| + | </noinclude> |
||
Latest revision as of 11:38, 3 August 2008
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Evil Greven (talk • contribs)[]
- Note: Greven went inactive
Greven is the creator of several articles on the GuildWiki and one of our most active documenters. He came to my attention when he pretty much singlehandedly polished Skills by Campaign into shape. Since then he has shown exceptional dedication to maintaining the quality of information in the various skill and skill list pages. He is also an active watcher of Special:Recentchanges and has fought vandals on several occasions. My personal suspicion is that he never sleeps. — Stabber ✍ 15:42, 3 June 2006 (CDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I'm flattered to be part of these nominations. However, while I'm not strictly opposed to this, I must point out that I'm usually not online during the timeframe where we recently had such trouble. - Greven 02:49, 4 June 2006 (CDT)
Support[]
- Bishop I heartily endorse this product and/or service.
- — Skuld
17:41, 3 June 2006 (CDT) - Xasxas256 08:29, 15 September 2006 (CDT) Knows his way around all aspects of the GuildWiki well enough to justify adminship.
Oppose[]
- (your vote here)
Neutral[]
- Greven is an absolutely magnificent editor, and the wiki is significantly better off for having him—however, I've seen little in the way of interactions with other users that confirms (or denies) his ability to interact as an administrator. —Tanaric 10:00, 7 August 2006 (CDT)
- I share the same sentiments as Tanaric. — Jyro X
13:22, 16 November 2006 (CST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.