Changes: GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Gigathrash

Revision as of 05:19, 22 February 2011

The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Gigathrash (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)

For the second and final bureaucrat seat, I have tentatively chosen Gigathrash. Despite being a very old hand and universally beloved, he has always shunned administrative powers. The time for change is now. 07:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

K.--Łô√ë

îğá†ħŕášħ 08:00, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Instructions

Please summarize the candidate's qualifications below. Add your summary as a brief bullet-point. Then go to the talkpage and explain your points in more detail.

To add a rebuttal to another's point, indent and add another brief bullet. Then discuss on the talkpage.

Discussions, more elaboration on a point, lengthy counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the talkpage.

Supporting qualities

Ancient
Active
Constantly on IRC
Has been promoting wiki activity with contests and games for years
very friendly towards everybody
...

Opposing qualities

(list specific opposing factors here)

Neutral/Double-edged qualities

Rants for hours about nothing in particular

Community Support

Please place your signature to indicate your support or non-support. Do not argue. Also realize that this is in no way influential towards the other merits of the candidate, just a gauge of public support.

I support this candidacy.

Oh hell yes! (also: first!) --El_Nazgir 10:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
◄mendel► 11:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Obviously yes. DKS01 11:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 13:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Certainly! Jink 15:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
He nominated me for admin waaaaay back when, the least I can do is return the favor by supporting him now. —Dr Ishmael 15:44, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Grr, this is what happens when I ski for a day, miss the first support :< — Scythe 19:15, 20 Feb 2011 (UTC)
Always a good person to chat to, get help from, etc.. Even if he may be out of the ordinary, he's great and likable. Ariyen 22:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Duh -- Random Time 19:39, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
The Gigathrash are almighty force. Resistance would be futile (and who would want to resist, anyways?) Their thought patterns are beyond the comprehension of mortal men, but my puny mortal brain believes they would use administration tools responsibly. —Wizardboy777(talk) 02:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

I oppose this candidacy.

your sig here

I am neutral/undecided.

your sig here

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color: #F3F9FF;  margin: 3em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAA;">
-{{rfa top}}
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. <span style="color: red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!-- inserted with: template:rfa top -->
 == [[User:Gigathrash|Gigathrash]] ([[User talk:Gigathrash|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Gigathrash|contribs]] &bull; [[Special:Editcount/Gigathrash|edit count]] &bull; [[GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Gigathrash|RFA page]]) ==
@@ Line 51: / Line 54: @@
 ====I am neutral/undecided.====
 # ''your sig here''
+<div style="clear:both;"></div>
-{{rfa bottom}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.''
+</div>
+<!-- inserted with template:rfa bottom -->