GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Hellbringer

Hellbringer (talk • contribs)

I monitor recent changes as much as I can and also am on the lookout for vandals. Hellbringer (T/C) 23:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I accept because I nominated myself :D. --Hellbringer (T/C) 23:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Support

1. Mild support. Has been active for a while, but MS sucks!-- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

   I don't play MS anymore. --Hellbringer (T/C) 23:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

   Good, you anime whore.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

   Yes I know I'm an anime whore lol bs plus I love emo slut druggies. --Hellbringer (T/C) 23:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

   Druggies? There's more than one, now?-- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

   No. I'm just saying I love emo slut druggies which means I love emo slut druggies not meaning that theres more of them just saying I love one gosh. --Hellbringer (T/C) 23:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

2. Yeh sure go for it-- 18:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

1. This is nothing against HB, but watching RC and looking out for vandals isn't really something that is distinguished from alot of other users. Admins should have a strong awareness of policy and familiarity with the wiki itself. They should be long time users who really know the wiki inside and out. I don't feel that HB has done anything to distinguish himself from any other user who is looking for vandalism. —♥Jedi♥Rogue♥ 23:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

   Perfectly good reason to oppose. --Hellbringer (T/C) 23:47, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

2. Contribution list is just user talk page edits and a bunch of "/attention phails" messages on image talk pages. -- (gem / talk) 23:58, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

   Uhh I should have said disregard the "/attention phails" message on image talk pages :D. --Hellbringer (T/C) 23:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

   Well that leaves only user talk page edits. Not doing any good. :P -- (gem / talk) 00:10, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   Oh, forgot to mention that I would like us to have any spammer admins at all. We have one and I'll suffer him because he does his job well. -- (gem / talk) 00:11, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   (edit conflict) I have however before a lot of the "/attention phails" messages on image talk pages have uploaded various new images for the BMP weapons because they all had a tag for image replacement, also have helped Marco stop a vandal, and have added Ranger Norn Armor dyed images. --Hellbringer (T/C) 00:12, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   Do you need sysop tools for that? -- (gem / talk) 00:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   Well, to really stop a vandal, you would.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 00:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   There are better candidates for sysophood. I'd consider if GWiki was really in trouble with vandals but that isn't the case.

   FYI, some contrib lists: (note that all contribs to those name spaces during his whole wiki carreer are shown on those pages. Not a lot really...) main name space, main talk name space, GW name space, GW talk name space. -- (gem / talk) 00:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   Yeah. I'm not really cut out for adminship I guess. --Hellbringer (T/C) 00:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   Don't take this personally. We all need to start somewhere and in time you'll get to the point where you are aiming at. :) I remember when I started off with a couple of small edits to some Underworld quests in late 2005. That led to a few more edits here and there. That led to taking part in policy discussions and daily all around the clock life at GuildWiki and then into adminship. -- (gem / talk) 00:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   And on to taking a self-nominated nomination seriously!--Sefre Talk*Cont. 00:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   WTF lol. Anyways I need to find something that I find interesting to edit and keep expanding to it (exclude Marco's talk page lol). --Hellbringer (T/C) 00:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   And a small but imho necessary addition for reference: no vandalism plz. -- (gem / talk) 02:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   Well if Marco's RfA was still going on I would point out his. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 02:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   No real need to bring up far past things like that Gem. I've vandalised once when I first came here as an IP, and I'm an admin now.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 02:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   How am I not surprised... Well, I've said before that I'll cope with ya since you do a great work with the admin tools. -- (gem / talk) 02:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   Check out the new main page edits lol. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 02:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

3. No offence HB, but admins really need to be able to know all policies and such, and as such, my vote goes to a no. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 18:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   None taken. I should learn the policies and also I know where you got this from (points to marco's talk page). --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 19:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

4. I really, really appreciate your help with combatting vandals recently, but you truly aren't qualified or experienced with anything other than spamming. (I say this affectionately :>) (T/C) 02:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   None taken. I help out when I can. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 02:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

5. Have to go with Entropy on this one. Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 23:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
6. You have no experience, you are too young and you dont like me. kthxbai --Mr Ex Vandal 23:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   One thing, Marco is younger than me so what then and also I don't like you because of all those vandalized pages. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 23:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   i know dear. i would have opposed with all my powers against the election of that childish dumbass, but i came too late. oh well. --Mr Ex Vandal 23:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   Well, at least it would've added some variety in my nomination, eh? -- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   Ehh. All I got to say is this is pretty much a homo vote because not really related to why you oppose me. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 23:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   Also, MP, you weren't the only one to get an 18-0 vote on your RfA: Gem got a 19-0. phail. --Shadowcrest 23:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   Anyone else agree with me that the vote from Mr Ex Vandal is totally off topic and shouldn't even be there. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 23:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   if people saw how marco behaves on the official wiki i dont think they would have supported him. hed have only a bunch of votes from 10-15 yrs old guys. Anyways my vote is serious. i dont think you are up to the task. dont be offended. --Mr Ex Vandal 23:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   I believe that I already apologized for that and explained it was simply a bad day. Anyways, GW:YAV. Age doesn't matter. Get over your grudge against me plx -- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   Uhh. I got one thing to say, I'm experienced with wiki coding. Oh yeah and also your vote ain't really serious seeing from above vote. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 23:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   And, you forget 1 thing: pretty much everyone influential, and most of everyone else too, saw that, thanks to Entropy's talk page. We knew about it --Gimmethegepgun 23:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   Also I say <s> his vote. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 23:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   Oh, quit it. This whole "Mr Ex Vandal" facade is stupid, I agree, but so is your RfA. You are not up to the task of being a sysadmin, for the simple fact that you lack too much of the characteristics needed to be one. Doesn't matter if you have experience with wikicode, it's all of the social skills you are lacking. --Mr Ex Vandal 23:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   (RI)Social skills? Who ever said you need those to be an admin? --Gimmethegepgun 23:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   Sure, just look at Skuld! I'M KIDDING, I LOVE SKULD! -- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

   No one's gonna disagree with you on that one, MP! --Gimmethegepgun 00:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

   /agree. I've come across more than one admin with atrocious social skills. While I admit that saying "I oppose cause you don't like me" and "I oppose cause you're too young" are not valid reasons for an oppose vote, voting no from lack of experience is a valid vote. Sorry Hell. --Shadowcrest 00:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

   Mr Ex Vanda is allowed to have his opinnion just like anyone else here. Why are you asking for his vote to be striked but not mine for example? He has an opinnion, he has stood behind it and explanied it and that's more than enough. -- (gem / talk) 00:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

   By social skills I mean your behavior towards all other people. Yesterday you said something in the lines of "Let's go vandalize GWW, because the vandal here was probably one of theirs" (wasn't true, I'm not even registered at GWW). See, that's exactly what you are lacking. --Mr Ex Vandal 00:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

   Plus, it's not technically a vote. It's just to see if the community thinks the user should be promoted or not. It's ultimately the B-crat's decision.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 00:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

   That quote = joke --Gimmethegepgun 00:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

   That quote wasn't a joke. --Mr Ex Vandal 00:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

   Learn sarcasm moar pl0x-- (Talk) (Contr.) 00:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

   You aren't being funny with your 1337speak one liners. And by the way it's quite easy to see that wasn't sarcasm in any from or shape. --Mr Ex Vandal 00:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

   The internet has already firmly established in all ways shapes and forms that sarcasm does NOT transfer on the internet unless clearly stated.--igathrashTalk^Cont 00:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

7. Sorry hell, but you have done nothing of incredible worth and value (AKA, you're not on Guildwiki more then you exist), and we have enough active admins running around to last us until we either get bigger or Entropy gets killed off in an Anet plot device.--igathrashTalk^Cont 00:38, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

1. /hellbringer phails. You are active, which is good, but I don't see much edits that actually help. Cress Arvein 00:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   Well you have seen useful edits today. The crazy Reverts from the vandal. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 02:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

2. A spamming admin!?!?! Eh I've seen worse come from so called respected admins of this wiki.--Sefre Talk*Cont. 00:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   *Raises hand*-- (Talk) (Contr.) 00:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   ROFL. Marco just = nub luvah. --Hellbringer (T/C) 00:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   Lul, I = hot gf luvah. Hell = emo slut-druggie luvah -- (Talk) (Contr.) 00:06, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

   All the way lets spam this too lol. --Hellbringer (T/C) 00:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

3. Yet again, never seen him before. But then again, he's been here longer than me. — ク Eloc 貢 18:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)