Difference between revisions of "GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Jink"

From GuildWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 43: Line 43:
 
# [[User:Kaede|Kaede]] 23:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 
# [[User:Kaede|Kaede]] 23:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 
# From what I've seen in my lurking, I feel safe in supporting this RfA. [[User:Nwash|<font color="#660099">'''Nwash'''</font>]] [[Image:User-Nwash-Eyes.png|link=User talk:Nwash]] 11:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 
# From what I've seen in my lurking, I feel safe in supporting this RfA. [[User:Nwash|<font color="#660099">'''Nwash'''</font>]] [[Image:User-Nwash-Eyes.png|link=User talk:Nwash]] 11:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  +
# I'm no longer an actual contributor here(having mostly moved from GW to WoW), but I do still follow GW and the site, and I have no objections here. [[User:DKS01|DKS01]] 10:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
   
 
====I oppose this candidacy.====
 
====I oppose this candidacy.====

Revision as of 10:18, 18 February 2011

Jink (talkcontribsedit countRFA page)

See Forum:Bureaucrats#Nomination: Jink. Because bureaucrat includes sysop tools, I'm opening an RfA prior to appointing Jink as a bureaucrat. This does not guarantee the RfA will pass. Felix Omni Signature.png 05:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Jink accepted the nomination on the forum page.

Instructions

Please summarize the candidate's qualifications below. Add your summary as a brief bullet-point. Then go to the talkpage and explain your points in more detail.

To add a rebuttal to another's point, indent and add another brief bullet. Then discuss on the talkpage.

Discussions, more elaboration on a point, lengthy counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the talkpage.

Supporting qualities

  • Nurturing and motherly
  • Married to a highly prolific editor, providing convenient contact
  • Is a dinosaur or something
  • actively plays Guild Wars
  • long-time loyal GuildWiki editor
  • long-time Guild Leader
  • lurks on IRC

Opposing qualities

  • Familial duties may prohibit availability

Neutral/Double-edged qualities

  • Tends to support Dr. ishmael in conflicts (but given that we don't see what happens behind the scenes, this may be a skewed perception)

Community Support

Please place your signature to indicate your support or non-support. Do not argue. Also realize that this is in no way influential towards the other merits of the candidate, just a gauge of public support.

I support this candidacy.

  1. ◄mendel► 11:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  2. Yes, I'm biased, but in this situation it seems that refraining from comment would be unacceptable. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 14:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  3. See talk. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 20:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  4. Jinkzilla will smash anyone's bases who threaten the wiki. — Scythe 20:49, 14 Feb 2011 (UTC)
  5. I think I've seen several conflicts by now where she was a voice of reason, including ones with Ish iirc. --TalkpageEl_Nazgir 22:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  6. From what little I've seen, she seems reasonable, levelheaded, and likely to take the responsibility seriously. —Wizardboy777(talk) 06:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  7. Of course -- RandomTime 18:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  8. Kaede 23:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
  9. From what I've seen in my lurking, I feel safe in supporting this RfA. Nwash User-Nwash-Eyes.png 11:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
  10. I'm no longer an actual contributor here(having mostly moved from GW to WoW), but I do still follow GW and the site, and I have no objections here. DKS01 10:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

I oppose this candidacy.

  1. your sig here

I am neutral/undecided.

  1. Neutral The Neutral message is the only thing that has me concerned with her being a b-crat. I'd gone support, but that could be an issue - if she sides with Ishmael and not the community one day. So, I am concerned as I don't know her views on how she might handle things like that. Ariyen 17:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
  2. See talk. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 19:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)