Changes: GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Jink

Latest revision as of 05:20, 22 February 2011

The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Jink (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)[]

See Forum:Bureaucrats#Nomination: Jink. Because bureaucrat includes sysop tools, I'm opening an RfA prior to appointing Jink as a bureaucrat. This does not guarantee the RfA will pass. 05:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Jink accepted the nomination on the forum page.

Jink was made sysop and bureaucrat on February 21 2011.

Supporting qualities[]

Nurturing and motherly
Married to a highly prolific editor, providing convenient contact
Is a dinosaur or something
actively plays Guild Wars
long-time loyal GuildWiki editor
long-time Guild Leader
lurks on IRC

Opposing qualities[]

Familial duties may prohibit availability

Neutral/Double-edged qualities[]

Tends to support Dr. ishmael in conflicts (but given that we don't see what happens behind the scenes, this may be a skewed perception)

Community Support[]

Please place your signature to indicate your support or non-support. Do not argue. Also realize that this is in no way influential towards the other merits of the candidate, just a gauge of public support.

I support this candidacy.[]

◄mendel► 11:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I'm biased, but in this situation it seems that refraining from comment would be unacceptable. —Dr Ishmael 14:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
See talk. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 20:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Jinkzilla will smash anyone's bases who threaten the wiki. — Scythe 20:49, 14 Feb 2011 (UTC)
I think I've seen several conflicts by now where she was a voice of reason, including ones with Ish iirc. --El_Nazgir 22:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
From what little I've seen, she seems reasonable, levelheaded, and likely to take the responsibility seriously. —Wizardboy777(talk) 06:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Of course -- Random Time 18:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Kaede 23:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
From what I've seen in my lurking, I feel safe in supporting this RfA. Nwash 11:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm no longer an actual contributor here(having mostly moved from GW to WoW), but I do still follow GW and the site, and I have no objections here. DKS01 10:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Cress Arvein 23:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
--Łô√ë îğá†ħŕášħ 22:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
–alistic 08:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

I oppose this candidacy.[]

your sig here

I am neutral/undecided.[]

Neutral The Neutral message is the only thing that has me concerned with her being a b-crat. I'd gone support, but that could be an issue - if she sides with Ishmael and not the community one day. So, I am concerned as I don't know her views on how she might handle things like that. Ariyen 17:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
~~See talk. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 19:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)~~

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color: #F3F9FF;  margin: 3em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. <span style="color: red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!-- inserted with: template:rfa top -->
 == [[User:Jink|Jink]] ([[User talk:Jink|talk]] &bull; [[Special:Contributions/Jink|contribs]] &bull; [[Special:Editcount/Jink|edit count]] &bull; [[GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Jink|RFA page]]) ==
@@ Line 6: / Line 11: @@
 ::Jink accepted the nomination on the forum page.
 <div style="background-color:WhiteSmoke; border:thin solid DimGray; margin:1em 2em; padding:1ex 2ex;">
-===Instructions===
+''Jink was made sysop and bureaucrat on February 21 2011.''
-''Please summarize the candidate's qualifications below. Add your summary as a '''brief''' bullet-point. Then go to the [[GuildWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Jink|talkpage]] and explain your points in more detail.''
-''To add a rebuttal to another's point, indent and add another '''brief''' bullet. Then discuss on the talkpage.''
-''Discussions, more elaboration on a point, lengthy counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the [[GuildWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Jink|talkpage]].''
 </div>
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 * Is a dinosaur or something
 * actively plays Guild Wars
+* long-time loyal GuildWiki editor
 * long-time Guild Leader
 * lurks on [[GW:IRC|IRC]]
@@ Line 33: / Line 34: @@
 ====I support this candidacy.====
+# [[User:Mendel|◄mendel►]] 11:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
-# ''your sig here''
+# Yes, I'm biased, but in this situation it seems that refraining from comment would be unacceptable.  &mdash;[[User:Dr_ishmael|Dr Ishmael]] [[File:Diablo_the_chicken.gif|link=User_talk:Dr_ishmael]] 14:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
+# See talk. [[User:Arnout aka The Emperors Angel|Arnout aka The Emperors Angel]] 20:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
+# Jinkzilla will smash anyone's bases who threaten the wiki. &mdash; [[User:Scythe|<span style="font-family:monotype corsiva;color:FireBrick;">Scythe</span>]] [[User_talk:Scythe|<span style="color:#2F4F4F;font-family:monotype corsiva;">20:49, 14 Feb 2011 (UTC)</span>]]
+# I think I've seen several conflicts by now where she was a voice of reason, including ones with Ish iirc. --[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]][[User:El_Nazgir|<font color="Green">'''El_Nazgir'''</font>]] 22:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
+# From what little I've seen, she seems reasonable, levelheaded, and likely to take the responsibility seriously. &mdash;[[User:Wizardboy777|Wizardboy777]]<small>[[User talk:Wizardboy777|(talk)]]</small> 06:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
+# Of course -- <span class="sigpic">'''[[User:Randomtime|<font color="black">Random</font>]][[User talk:Randomtime|<font color="Orange">Time</font>]]'''</span> 18:58, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
+# [[User:Kaede|Kaede]] 23:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
+# From what I've seen in my lurking, I feel safe in supporting this RfA.  [[User:Nwash|<font color="#660099">'''Nwash'''</font>]] [[Image:User-Nwash-Eyes.png|link=User talk:Nwash]] 11:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
+# I'm no longer an actual contributor here(having mostly moved from GW to WoW), but I do still follow GW and the site, and I have no objections here. [[User:DKS01|DKS01]] 10:18, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
+# [[User:Cress Arvein|Cress Arvein]] [[Image:Cress sig.JPG]] 23:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
+# --Łô√ë [[Image:Gigathrash_sig_G.jpg]][[User:Gigathrash|<font color="Black">îğá†ħŕášħ</font>]] 22:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
+# &ndash;<span class="sigpic" style="font-family:Calibri;">[[File:User Balistic Pve sig.png|x19px|link=User:Balistic]][[User:Balistic|<font color="#7777cc">alistic</font>]] 08:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)</span>
 ====I oppose this candidacy.====
@@ Line 39: / Line 52: @@
 ====I am neutral/undecided.====
+# ''Neutral'' The Neutral message is the only thing that has me concerned with her being a b-crat. I'd gone support, but that could be an issue - if she sides with Ishmael and not the community one day. So, I am concerned as I don't know her views on how she might handle things like that. [[User:Ariyen|Ariyen]] 17:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
-# ''your sig here''
+# <strike>See talk. [[User:Arnout aka The Emperors Angel|Arnout aka The Emperors Angel]] 19:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)</strike>
+<div style="clear:both;"></div>
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page.''
+</div>
+<!-- inserted with template:rfa bottom -->
+[[Category:Resolved RfAs]] [[Category:Accepted RfAs]]