@DeletedUser40329927 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Wizardboy77716527@legacy41698927 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
# Jinkzilla will smash anyone's bases who threaten the wiki. — [[User:Scythe|<span style="font-family:monotype corsiva;color:FireBrick;">Scythe</span>]] [[User_talk:Scythe|<span style="color:#2F4F4F;font-family:monotype corsiva;">20:49, 14 Feb 2011 (UTC)</span>]] |
# Jinkzilla will smash anyone's bases who threaten the wiki. — [[User:Scythe|<span style="font-family:monotype corsiva;color:FireBrick;">Scythe</span>]] [[User_talk:Scythe|<span style="color:#2F4F4F;font-family:monotype corsiva;">20:49, 14 Feb 2011 (UTC)</span>]] |
||
# I think I've seen several conflicts by now where she was a voice of reason, including ones with Ish iirc. --[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]][[User:El_Nazgir|<font color="Green">'''El_Nazgir'''</font>]] 22:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
# I think I've seen several conflicts by now where she was a voice of reason, including ones with Ish iirc. --[[Image:El Nazgir sig.png|Talkpage]][[User:El_Nazgir|<font color="Green">'''El_Nazgir'''</font>]] 22:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
+ | # From what little I've seen, she seems reasonable, levelheaded, and likely to take the responsibility seriously. —[[User:Wizardboy777|Wizardboy777]]<small>[[User talk:Wizardboy777|(talk)]]</small> 06:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC) |
||
#''your sig here'' |
#''your sig here'' |
||
Revision as of 06:09, 15 February 2011
Jink (talk • contribs • edit count • RFA page)
See Forum:Bureaucrats#Nomination: Jink. Because bureaucrat includes sysop tools, I'm opening an RfA prior to appointing Jink as a bureaucrat. This does not guarantee the RfA will pass. 05:22, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
- Jink accepted the nomination on the forum page.
Instructions
Please summarize the candidate's qualifications below. Add your summary as a brief bullet-point. Then go to the talkpage and explain your points in more detail.
To add a rebuttal to another's point, indent and add another brief bullet. Then discuss on the talkpage.
Discussions, more elaboration on a point, lengthy counter-arguments, etc. should be directed to the talkpage.
Supporting qualities
- Nurturing and motherly
- Married to a highly prolific editor, providing convenient contact
- Is a dinosaur or something
- actively plays Guild Wars
- long-time loyal GuildWiki editor
- long-time Guild Leader
- lurks on IRC
Opposing qualities
- Familial duties may prohibit availability
Neutral/Double-edged qualities
- Tends to support Dr. ishmael in conflicts (but given that we don't see what happens behind the scenes, this may be a skewed perception)
Community Support
Please place your signature to indicate your support or non-support. Do not argue. Also realize that this is in no way influential towards the other merits of the candidate, just a gauge of public support.
I support this candidacy.
- ◄mendel► 11:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm biased, but in this situation it seems that refraining from comment would be unacceptable. —Dr Ishmael 14:15, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- See talk. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 20:20, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Jinkzilla will smash anyone's bases who threaten the wiki. — Scythe 20:49, 14 Feb 2011 (UTC)
- I think I've seen several conflicts by now where she was a voice of reason, including ones with Ish iirc. --El_Nazgir 22:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- From what little I've seen, she seems reasonable, levelheaded, and likely to take the responsibility seriously. —Wizardboy777(talk) 06:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
- your sig here
I oppose this candidacy.
- your sig here
I am neutral/undecided.
- Neutral The Neutral message is the only thing that has me concerned with her being a b-crat. I'd gone support, but that could be an issue - if she sides with Ishmael and not the community one day. So, I am concerned as I don't know her views on how she might handle things like that. Ariyen 17:56, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
See talk. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 19:46, 14 February 2011 (UTC)