GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.


Line 16: Line 16:
#Oh come on, Build erm...Guild Wiki isn't as entertaining without him. --[[User:|]] 16:38, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
#Oh come on, Build erm...Guild Wiki isn't as entertaining without him. --[[User:|]] 16:38, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
#I know the nom counts as a vote, but I have to vote again. —[[Image:BlastThatT.jpg]][[User:Blastedt|Blastedt]] 16:42, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
#I know the nom counts as a vote, but I have to vote again. —[[Image:BlastThatT.jpg]][[User:Blastedt|Blastedt]] 16:42, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
# --[[User:FireFox|<font color=#FF6600>'''FireFox'''</font>]] [[Image:firefoxav.gif]] 16:01, 25 March 2007 (CDT)
==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====

Revision as of 21:01, 25 March 2007

Skuld (talkcontribs)

Skuld is the best, everyone knows it. I think skuld is the best, readmin him please. Oh, btw, this is a quality nomination ^.^ —BlastThatT.jpgBlastedt 19:58, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


  1. I always liked Skuld. I think he should be an admin once again. --Lania ElderfireMy Talk 20:41, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
  2. Cheese Slaya 20:06, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
  3. Rollerzerris.jpg <!--Zerris--> 20:10, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
  4. Jeez, u pplz r crazy! Skuld rocks my kurzick socks! i beat he could beat Abaddon, Rurik, and Shiro in a game of go-fish! GO SKULD!--Kurzspear 21:04, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
  5. I don't like how he thinks or what he does, and he put me up for banning once, and yet I can't really see a problem in his administratorship. This isn't a popularity contest ("so and so rocks or sucks" comments are extremely childish), this is a vote on his capability to use and not abuse his power, and at that I never saw much danger. I DO wish he'd stay away from the build section. NightAngel 08:16, 22 March 2007 (CDT)
  6. -- Nova NovaSmall.PNG -- (contribs) 15:53, 22 March 2007 (CDT)
  7. WE NEED OUR BAD COP! ;-) - Candle.jpg Krowman (talkcontribs) 22:06, 22 March 2007 (CDT)
  8. -Auron My Talk 01:15, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
  9. Oh come on, Build erm...Guild Wiki isn't as entertaining without him. -- 16:38, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
  10. I know the nom counts as a vote, but I have to vote again. —BlastThatT.jpgBlastedt 16:42, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
  11. --FireFox Firefoxav.gif 16:01, 25 March 2007 (CDT)


  1. I do not favor Skuld's adminship Craw 20:17, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
  2. I don't see why he has to become a Moderator again, he blew it the last time. I fail to see how he has improved his behaviour. Solus Shield of Judgment.jpg 23:42, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
  3. He's improved his attitude and behavior a great deal, and continues with good contributions, but I don't think it's been long enough to merit readmin. And I'd like to see how he participates in the upcoming new builds system first. (Also, having a nomination that sounds like a joke doesn't help, though that's not Skuld's fault.) — HarshLanguage HarshLanguage 05:34, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
  4. With the upcoming builds wipe i feel that we do not need any more admins. --Kitty1.jpg (Talk) (Cont) (Cool) Soft2.jpg06:11, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
  5. I feel that his attitude towards other wiki editors needs improvment. - BeXor Bexor.png 07:52, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
  6. Too...much...sarcasm... --SigmA

Omigod.jpg 12:34, 21 March 2007 (CDT)

  1. We all know why Skuld has been demoted, let us not do that again. --SigmA

Omigod.jpg 06:42, 25 March 2007 (CDT)

  1. While a respected and fun wiki member as well as an obviously experienced wiki member, Skuld is just not admin material. He agitates people quite often on the builds section, for one. Deserving people, yes, but still he has behaviors that are un-admin like. He proved that to us once before and no doubt he will prove it again. His apparent refusal of nomination seems to mean that he doesn't even want adminship. If he shapes up his act (which actually has a good possibilty thanks to the build wipe), then I may neutralize this vote. Until then, he needs to prove that he is more than just a member and a cool dude. As a side note, these "SKULD KAWWAII ^______^" votes are a little unsettling.--Nog64Talk Yaaaay.JPG 16:39, 22 March 2007 (CDT)
  2. Weak Oppose Both sides make good arguments here, but for now at least, I am leaning towards the opposition a bit more. Admittedly, the quality of the nomination and some of the votes in favor of adminship did contribute to my decision to vote opposed. Defiant Elements (talk ~ contribs) 01:10, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
    Appreciate the compliment. I mean, it must be me on the other side, cause the other votes are "I like Skuld" and "Skuld could beat Abaddon". It's weird casting a favored vote, but I trust our system of checks and balances. This isn't politics, I don't vote for people I find pretty or likeable. I vote for people who are responsible enough not to abuse their power. It's just that simple. NightAngel 01:56, 23 March 2007 (CDT)


  1. o.O'...More than likely I'll change my vote to favored next time I stop by, but it's 4:00AM here and I think at this point I'm too much of a baka to cast a good vote. ^_^; I love you Sempai. <3 *glomp*— builds Azroth talk 03:53, 20 March 2007 (CDT)
  2. I really dont know. Skuld has contributed so much, but does removing his powers stop him from doing so still? Skuld was often rude, sarcastic, uncompassionate and sometimes plain illogical, but he was also efficient and got the job done for the most part. IIRC, isnt he only what 16-17? Thats my age and I wouldn't even dream of being a mod. I cant even vote! I know hes changed too, but is that just because he has no power? I think its too early to tell, its only been like a month.--— Hyprodimus Prime talk 04:29, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
    He is 14 or so --SigmA

Omigod.jpg 07:11, 24 March 2007 (CDT)