- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- User:Gold Dean voluntarily withdrew his candidacy on September 13, 2007.
Gold Dean (talk • contribs)[]
Rationale for nomination. (Was actually a self-nomination. See GuildWiki talk:Requests for adminship#Candidates?) (Talk) (Contr.) 15:04, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support[]
- (your vote here)
Oppose[]
- Never seen the user on RC. Less than 500 total edits, including his own elaborate user page. Impossible to form any sort of opinion on adminworthiness, so cannot support. BftP 13:35, 12 September 2007 (CDT)
- I'm sorry, but you are too inexperienced. —ShadyGuy 13:55, 12 September 2007 (CDT)
- Very little activity, almost none on maintenance edits and no examples on good grasp of policies and arbitration. --Ab.Er.Rant (msg Aberrant80) 20:41, 12 September 2007 (CDT)
- Per others. 70 or so mainspace edits just isn't enough. BigAstro 01:36, 13 September 2007 (CDT)
- Barely any mainspace activity, no proof of the qualities needed in the admins on this wiki. Aberrant's vote says what I'd like to much more eloquently. Lord of all tyria 08:51, 13 September 2007 (CDT)
Neutral[]
- Has great intentions, but I'm afraid that I don't see you trying to enforce policies or reverting vandalism all that much-- (Talk) (Contr.) 14:43, 12 September 2007 (CDT)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.