GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Xeeron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Xeeron (talk • contribs)

Note: Xeeron changed his acceptance to "No."

Xeeron has been the guiding voice of the builds section of this wiki that continues to grow more and more popular every day and I am sure will soon eclipse the rest of the wiki in terms of popularity. It's high time he was promoted. 12.44.215.27 05:48, 4 June 2006 (CDT)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

First, thanks for the nomination and the nice words. I can be around in the mentioned time period and I dont think I will leave guild wiki anytime soon. That being said, you should consider that I spend a constant but not a huge amount of time on the wiki. My main interest is the builds section, whereas my knowledge of wiki code is rather basic. As an admin, I would try to mediate conflicts, but I lack the hunter instinct to patrol recent changed 24/7 for vandals. I have no craving to become admin, but I will do the job if called upon. --Xeeron 16:46, 8 June 2006 (CDT)

Given that I have choosen to leave the wiki for now, I guess my answer needs to be changed to: No. --Xeeron 05:46, 25 November 2006 (CST)

Support

1. Bishop -- Xeeron was indeed a major contibutor to the rework of the builds organization, and is an active contributor. He's on vacation, however, so it may be a while before he responds.
2. Strong Support I intended to nominate Xeeron too when he got back from vacation but anyway now that he has been nominated, I'd like to say that he'd make a fantastic admin. He's almost single handedly brought the builds section up to scratch, he's had some good and realistic ideas which he's seen through to completion, he involves the community in discussion well and is very even handed in conflicts. Good luck mate! --Xasxas256 06:06, 4 June 2006 (CDT)
3. Support. Per nom. — Stabber ✍ 06:07, 4 June 2006 (CDT)
4. — Skuld 06:39, 4 June 2006 (CDT)
5. --I am 161.88 12:52, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
6. He declines everytime, but let's try again. :) --Karlos 18:54, 5 June 2006 (CDT)
7. Tetris L 07:24, 6 June 2006 (CDT)
8. Strong Support As he's mentioned being willing if drafted, I'll add my support here. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:53, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
9. Has this been settled yet? I second the motion. --Nilles 20:50, 18 June 2006 (CDT)
10. --Rapta 20:06, 30 June 2006 (CDT)
11. If more admins are needed, I strongly support this user. This vote of support does not necessarily mean I currently think we need more admins. Tanaric 07:30, 18 July 2006 (CDT)
12. I'm new to the wiki, but every time I see something going on with the builds section not only does Xeeron seem to be highly involved, but also the main voice of reason. On top of that, the fact that he doesn't seem to be gunning for this promotion leads me to believe that he would be an excellent admin and wouldn't abuse his power.--Azroth 23:29, 10 September 2006 (CDT)
13. Definitely a good choice for an admin. -- Ifer (t/c) 16:03, 30 September 2006 (CDT)
14. Aye. (Is this vote really still open?) --MRA 07:06, 9 October 2006 (CDT)
15. Strong Support This product is endorsed by me! Buy more Xeeron! — Jyro X 13:25, 16 November 2006 (CST)
16. We need more wood! Kessel 12:47, 20 November 2006 (CST)
17. Strong Support Excellent contributor, no reason to think he wouldn't make a great admin. Here's hoping he comes back here one day. --NieA7 07:27, 28 December 2006 (CST)

Oppose

1. Strong Oppose This player rates PVP Builds without actually testing them in the Arenas. 70.132.22.101 13:31, 25 July 2006 (CDT)
2. Mercurius Ter Maxim 18:02, 18 September 2006 (CDT)

Neutral

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.