GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
Register
(Archiving issues to /Resolved/)
(template subst, Replaced: {{unsigned| → {{subst:unsigned| AWB)
Line 186: Line 186:
   
 
==(somewhat) inappropriate ad==
 
==(somewhat) inappropriate ad==
The ad for Adult Swim with the half-naked man is hardly appropriate for the wiki, in my opinion.{{unsigned|69.255.226.122}}
+
The ad for Adult Swim with the half-naked man is hardly appropriate for the wiki, in my opinion.<small>&mdash;''The preceding [[GuildWiki:Sign your comments|unsigned]] comment was added by'' [[User talk:69.255.226.122|69.255.226.122]] ([[Special:Contributions/69.255.226.122|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}.</small><!--Inserted with Template:Unsigned-->
 
:It's a guy in a bathing suit on a beach. Hardly inappropriate. &mdash;[[User:JediRogue|<font color=red>'''♥<font color=darkgreen>Jedi</font>♥<font color=darkgreen>Rogue</font>♥'''</font>]] 00:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 
:It's a guy in a bathing suit on a beach. Hardly inappropriate. &mdash;[[User:JediRogue|<font color=red>'''♥<font color=darkgreen>Jedi</font>♥<font color=darkgreen>Rogue</font>♥'''</font>]] 00:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
   

Revision as of 05:47, 29 April 2008

Old resolved software and technical bugs can be found here.


Interwiki link request

I'd like to request interwiki link with the PvXwki (http://www.pvxwiki.com) using the PvX: prefix, so that PvX:Main Page would like to PvXwiki's main page. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 21:04, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I've added that to the Interwiki map but that's not currently in use on this wiki. I'll try to get this enabled here. Is it going to be a problem if w:whatever links point to the Central Wikia instead of to Wikipedia? Angela 12:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Nothing on GWiki links to Wikia, so that would be a problem unless all existing W:something links were converted as part of this change. Also it would take a bit of getting used to since W:X linkage is second nature here now; may want to make a Site Notice or whatever Entropy Sig (T/C) 02:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
From what PanSola has written, thought the idea was we could use something like [[PvX:Minion Master]] in an article and it would go to an article named "Minion Master" on the PvX wiki, or have I mis-read something here? --Wolfie Wolfie sig (talk|contribs) 02:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
You're right. That's what it will do if it's set up. I was just wondering if applying the rest of Wikia's interwiki map here would cause problems since it includes w: to mean Wikia, whereas this wiki seems to use w: to mean Wikipedia. Angela 03:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
A simple bot to convert all W: to Wikipedia: or something like that would eliminate that problem, I think...Other than that minor snag, interwiki-map ability would certainly be handy for PvX linking. Entropy Sig (T/C) 04:12, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
If there are still any w: links left, they will need to be changed to Wikipedia: instead of w: but it looks like that was more common anyway. Angela 04:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Any prominent W: links will probably get fixed as soon as people realize they changed, so I think you're clear to go ahead and add it now. Entropy Sig (T/C) 04:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
If we can't get a bot to do a search-n-replace, is there a way to search for em? (ie, generate a list and gather a few people to get them all corrected sooner rather than later). --Wolfie Wolfie sig (talk|contribs) 05:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
JSharp is creating a bot to fix the interwikis listed here, at least the ones in articles. Angela 07:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Bad Coding?

I'm new to the wiki and have been trying to update the monster pictures. i was instructed by some helpful comunity members to replace the old images instead of adding a whole new one to the database. While this has worked for me usually, I've been having problems repalacing the old Modniir pictures. I have entered the replace file with updated version link and uploaded the appropriate picture from my computer. However, instead of uploading the image as I desired, it instead distorted the old image to the dimentions of my image and failed to load my new image. How can I go about fixing this without uploading entirely new files to the database?--Lord Twitchiopolis 01:59, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

You may need to clear your browser cache. Refresh the page, it might be showing up incorrectly but actually be correct. --Shadowcrest 02:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

thanks. It showed up correctly approx 15min after I edited it....must have alot in cache V_V'--208.40.188.107 02:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Odd Ads

Recently I saw an ad advertising http://www.mobularity.com. It was an annoying flashy ad saying "IS YOUR LOVE CHEATING ON YOU?," while flashing between hot pink and black. There is also an ad for Live-Giveaway.com, advertising a "free" Guild Wars Nightfall. Naturally, this seems suspect. (Signed later than should have been by Theta Republic 23:42, 14 December 2007 (UTC) )

I have just encountered an ad while viewing "Sunspears in Cantha." It was an ad for "www.GdpChina.com." It said it had 10 billion gold in stock. Gee, makes me want to know what kind of builds they use. :P Theta Republic 06:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I also saw the "Is your love cheating on you?" ad, I saw it, I think when I was on my talk page unlogged, I came here to report it, logged in, and on that that screen, I saw it again. Thoughtful 19 12:31, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Annoying Ad

Lately I have been seeing a particularly annoying advertisement popping up which I feel is both "Inappropriate" (flashing animation w/rainbow colors) and somewhat smutty as well. Its banner reads "Calculate the exact name of your lover!" or something to that effect, while two static cutouts "kiss" in the background. I can't get the target link for the ad, since it's made in Flash and thus a "Properties" isn't obtainable through a simple right-mouse click, and this sort of ad almost always leads to sites which could compromise your Internet security...not to mention the ad already hints at what sorts of top-quality content could be found there. It may not be explicitly pornographic, but I think this toes the line of acceptable/tasteful content. Entropy Sig (T/C) 05:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

I need the URL it points to to be able to block it. You might be able to get that by viewing the html source of the page if it isn't right-clickable. Angela 12:41, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


Obscene annoying ad

Have you checked the link to FuryWiki? It is both obscene and annoying, and has nothing to do with game information. Legend Victoria

It's not exactly an ad, but it seems the admins over there are doing absolutely nothing. I'll go revert it now. Cress Arvein 02:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Actually, after looking at the wiki itself, the link is worthless. I'll try to get it removed. Cress Arvein 02:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Questionable "sponsors" ad

On the sidebar, under "sponsors" noted an advert claiming to offer "Download Guild Wars", this caught my interest as ArenaNet would be the only source for downloading the GW client. The link has the claim "Stop paying for new games! One time fee to download for life", my concern is that this may either be a scam (pay them a fee just to to download the GW client), or an illegal software site (though, without a valid product key, don't think you'd get far). The link was [1]. --Wolfie Wolfie sig (talk|contribs) 05:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting it. I'll have that one blocked. Angela 12:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

farming bot ads

One of the Ebay farming bot ads is sported right at the bottom of this page, as I'm typing this... It advertises 4 (random?) GW-related things offered on Ebay, 2 of which were farming bots. Type "guild wars" into an Ebay search and you will get a million hits, half of which will be bots. Nothing from Ebay should ever make it onto a wiki page, since Ebay is swarming with illegal bots and gold traders. In one of the reviews I saw a person complaining that they got permanently banned for using this particular bot, on a 2 year-old fully developed account. And I thought to myself "How naive did you have to be to buy a bot and not expect this to happen?" Too bad, he lost 2 years worth of play and over $100 worth of software for being greedy. Here is the current ad's url: 110192351486.jpg If possible, can you block anything that says "ebay" anywhere in the link? Thanks. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 03:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Here's another, with different content, same ad template: 330187609953.jpg. Please block anything with "ebay" in the string, since they seem to be randomly generated. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 03:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Does the community as a whole really want the whole of ebay blocked? It seems better as a first step to just block the problem ads themselves... what do you think? -- Sannse 12:29, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
The ads are randomly generated (the string of 12 numbers in the end), which means you will block one out of 10^12 permutations, which is wasted effort. And like I said, Ebays sells more bots than any other GW-related merchandise, so yes, block them ALL, or don't bother. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 03:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I thought that "farm", "farming", "run", "running", "gold", etc. were automatic red flags which caused ads to be blocked...we don't have to block all of Ebay unless their permutation program is advanced enough to do stuff like "Sell B0T for GW" (with a zero). Entropy Sig (T/C) 04:56, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
And this is coming from a person who got offended by a "Love Button" ad. :P (No offense, just find it funny ^_^). I thought that you block the address of the ad, which just says "blablablaebayblablasomenumbers" and has none of those flag words in it. Or does the blocking software analyze the ad's content? That would be too advanced for a free website. All in all, I will repeat myself again: Ebay has hundreds of, dare I stress, illegal bots up for sale as soon as you type "guild wars" in the search. It should not be anywhere near a wiki site that supposedly promotes honest gaming. It's not even about honesty as much as it is about the fact that any player will get banned for using one, thus, a wiki should not provide a direct link to such things. Just try the search yourself and you will see what I'm talking about. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 05:31, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I remember reading that Wikia blocks any ad that contains "gold" in some form or other. I don't think it's possible through image scanning or anything, but for any sort of text or code it would be easily checked...meh. Also, I'm not sure that we should be responsible for players' actions. It's obvious that our ads aren't things that we support or endorse. If someone was dumb enough to use an illegal bot advertised through EBay, that is their stupid decision and they deserve to be banned for it. If they claimed "well I saw an ad on Gwiki!" then that is a lame excuse...
Still, considering how strongly we police the gold ads, I guess you have a point. It is to some extent our responsibility to promote positive GW stuff. We certainly don't allow pages for illegal third-party software or mods (though we have some that are...questionably used...) Entropy Sig (T/C) 05:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Also, I just noticed that the links I provided only lead you to the thumbnail image that was displayed next to the sale items list, so the ad is not a single banner, it's a combo of several "frames" or whatever you want to call them. I would have given you all the links had I noticed this earlier. My bad. My argument is still correct, though. Wiki should not provide a link to a site that is swarming with illegal bots. Don't know how else to convince you. If someone wants to shop Ebay, then can go there directly at their own discretion. Everyone knows about it anyway. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 05:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, we block ads with the word "gold" (although the people writing the ads do all they can to bypass such filters of course!). I've mailed the guy that looks after our ads, and asked for a block on ebay or, if he thinks it is worth trying, a block on "bots", "farm" and "farming". I'll let you know what I hear back -- Sannse 12:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 20:00, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Another bad ad

[2]

I find the ad's language to be coarse, if implicit. "The Love Button - Push Me Hard!" just doesn't seem to convey the sort of attitude we want here. Entropy Sig (T/C) 05:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Again here, I have to ask if this is considered offensive by the majority here? We are happy to block anything that offends the majority of wiki users, or violates the rules of the game, but obviously we can't account for every taste, or we would never have ads at all. (wait! is that the plan!? ;) -- Sannse 12:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
To be honest I'm of the mind that ALL ads catering to sexually deprived/depraved preteens should be blocked anyways. Companies like that don't deserve to live... Entropy Sig (T/C) 04:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Actually, this ad had nothing to do with sex or explicit images. All it did was trick you into thinking it will give you your "true love's" name, while gathering a bunch of your information for sale. They made the ad seem like it leads to explicit content just so people would click it in the first place. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 05:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
It's still harmful, then. Information sale over the internets is a dangerous business to put yourself into, especially unknowingly. Entropy Sig (T/C) 05:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
True, but wiki is not responsible for police-ing people who can't recognize a phish, whether in E-mail or on a site. That should be common sense to any internet user. However, a guild wars wiki IS responsible for guild wars related illegal software ads, or directly explicit content, etc. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 05:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
That's a thin line to walk between what's obvious and what's not obvious, isn't it? What exactly are we responsible for policing - just Guild Wars related stuff and what we deem as "obviously malicious/inappropriate"? That seems like a double standard... Entropy Sig (T/C) 05:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

All I'm trying to say is that this one was a drop in the ocean. These things are all over the internet. I have nothing against blocking them, but it just seems like wasted effort. On the side note: thanks for all your contributions, Entropy. I seem them all over both GW wikis, and you are a valuable user. Not many people honestly give a d@mn about this :P, except for when they want to see a pretty picture or find a trick on how to beat a mission. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 05:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

I blame society for acclimating us to seeing shitsauce adds on all sorts of otherwise clean and legitimate websites. Point taken.
Uh, I don't contribute to GWW or PvXWiki at all. That must be someone else. (Damn, they stole my username!) Entropy Sig (T/C) 06:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Agreed. I just find things like this sort of "benign" anymore. The worst it could do is spam your E-mail inbox or wake you up at 8am with a sale call if you're silly enough to give a phone #. Explicit content is always offensive, though. As well as it really sux to get banned permanently.
Hehe, maybe I'm just so used to seeing your name that it seems like it's everywhere. :P Your sig stands out. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 06:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Awesomesauce. The ad now has a new permutation. "Is Your Love Cheating On You?" with two silhouettes of...hmm...sluts in the background. And it blinks, too. Wonderful. Entropy Sig (T/C) 03:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Ebay ads

Hi all, Michael tells me he has blocked these. If you see any more, please let me know. If possible, please right-click on the ad and give me the url shown for Image Properties - Location, or for the text link. It's also useful to know what page you saw the ad on. Thanks -- Sannse 20:56, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

error while opening page

ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved


While trying to retrieve the URL: http://gw.gamewikis.org/

The following error was encountered:

Unable to forward this request at this time. This request could not be forwarded to the origin server or to any parent caches. The most likely cause for this error is that:

The cache administrator does not allow this cache to make direct connections to origin servers, and All configured parent caches are currently unreachable. Your cache administrator is technical@wikia.com.


Generated Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:04:42 GMT by www.wikia.com (squid/2.6.STABLE16) Pul 15:11, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi, did you get this once? or many times? Was it after clicking a link? or using a bookmark? What was the URL you were trying to go to? And finally, what browser do you use? Thanks! -- Sannse 16:22, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
It apeared when i clicked on a link, but when i typed in http://gw.gamewikis.org i got the same error, as if the server couldn't handel my request. when i tried again a few minutes later everything was back to normal. I used IE7 when i got this error, didn't try it with FF becouse i don't think its a browser isue.Pul 19:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I'd probably diagnose the problem as "IE7" --Gimmethegepgun 20:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
lol Pul 10:19, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
hrh, go Firefox! Pul, it sounds like a transitory error, which could even be with one of the connection points between you and Wikia, rather than the server setup here. Please let me know if you keep seeing it. And if anyone else sees it, please say too! Thanks again -- 84.66.243.159 15:59, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Recent Changes

Just a little thing that's been bugging me. When you click on RC, you get this sentence: "Below are the last 50 changes in the last last 7 days, as of 10:13, 11 December 2007." (There are two instances of the word 'last'.) Kokuou 01:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Fixed, this is a bug in the MediaWiki default message. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 03:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Gold ad slipped by the filter

[3]

The ad says "Cheap WoW Gold", but that's beside the point. Block please. Entropy Sig (T/C) 16:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Gah, how did it even make it past the filter with "Gold" in there? >_<" -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 17:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Perhaps it used a pipe for an L? Who knows... --- VipermagiSig -- (s)talkpage 17:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
If it did, then my link is wrong, but with such small font it is hard to tell. I bet it is indeed a switch of lL to iI or something. Entropy Sig (T/C) 18:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

This one is also showing up all the time with a WoW gold selling related image banner. -- Gem (gem / talk) 22:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I just saw another gdp china one on Death Weasel's userpage ^^ *(not his fault of course) X Deity X Xdeityx 18:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I saw 1 on my userpage, its white and has an assassin on it Clouddyl

Big, graphical gold ad

"10000000 gold in stock"

I don't know how to properly report it, but here's the URL, for all the good that'll do.

http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=BQ5-1UCpkR8OTMoqsqQO2n4WsDo_q9jWT9e2mBMCNtwGw2wYQARgBIMGM9QI4AFDTlqGOBmDJ5s2H5KOkF6ABzajH-AOqAQo5MDAwMDAwMDIwsgEQZ3cuZ2FtZXdpa2lzLm9yZ7oBCTcyOHg5MF9hc8gBA9oBK2h0dHA6Ly9ndy5nYW1ld2lraXMub3JnL3dpa2kvVGFsazpDaGFyYWN0ZXKAAgGoAwHIAwXoA_0C6ANp6AO0BfUDIAEAAA&num=1&adurl=http://www.GdpChina.com&client=ca-pub-4086838842346968&nm=1 --Risuko Family 19:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I just saw this same ad for the second time today... X Deity X Xdeityx 20:16, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
WOW lol check this out- Ironic gold ad I took a screenie right after i saved the above comment. X Deity X Xdeityx 20:19, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, saw this same one on the Site Support page. Link to pic of ad~~ User:Frvwfr2 frvwfr2 (T/C) 21:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=B7sFR2jZlR6CjLY74-AKmzr3-C9uprzmT9e2mBMCNtwHAuAIQARgBIMGM9QI4AFDTlqGOBmD9qqGE1BKgAc2ox_gDqgEKOTAwMDAwMDAyMLIBEGd3LmdhbWV3aWtpcy5vcme6AQk3Mjh4OTBfYXPIAQPaATFodHRwOi8vZ3cuZ2FtZXdpa2lzLm9yZy93aWtpL1RhbGs6UmFwdG9yX05lc3RsaW5ngAIBqAMByAMF6AP9AugDtAXoA4ED9QMgAAAA&num=1&adurl=http://www.GdpChina.com&client=ca-pub-4086838842346968&nm=3 similar one i just spotted --Ricky 14:33, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I saw it today too! http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=BHFeAb05lR8-HE4TmwAGPpKT-C9uprzmT9e2mBMCNtwHAuAIQARgBIMGM9QI4AFDTlqGOBmDx1ZSG4B-gAc2ox_gDqgEKOTAwMDAwMDAyMLIBEGd3LmdhbWV3aWtpcy5vcme6AQk3Mjh4OTBfYXPIAQPaATJodHRwOi8vZ3cuZ2FtZXdpa2lzLm9yZy93aWtpL1NwZWNpYWw6UmVjZW50Y2hhbmdlc4ACAagDAcgDBegD_QLoA7QF&num=1&adurl=http://www.GdpChina.com&client=ca-pub-4086838842346968&nm=5 --AlpHaz 16:17, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Just got this one as well. http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=BSCHxGHVlR_SBM4Xw8QHrnfnKC9uprzmT9e2mBMCNtwHg1AMQARgBIMGM9QI4AFDTlqGOBmDJ1oaN5KTAE6ABzajH-AOqAQo5MDAwMDAwMDIwsgEQZ3cuZ2FtZXdpa2lzLm9yZ7oBCTcyOHg5MF9hc8gBA9oBJ2h0dHA6Ly9ndy5nYW1ld2lraXMub3JnL3dpa2kvVXNlcjpZaWtleYACAagDAcgDBegD_QLoA2k&num=1&adurl=http://www.GdpChina.com&client=ca-pub-4086838842346968&nm=9 Felix Omni Signature 18:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
OMG it's chasing me!! I see it at the bottom of every page! Help o_O --Ricky 23:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I see it too! :o --Curse You 01:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I should add, I first noticed it while I was looking through the Invincible Monk page. --Curse You 02:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
I just found it at the bottom of this very page whilst checking if others have found it! This ad could very well be a demon. Felix Omni Signature 02:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Same, following link: http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=BXDNIPuFlR-yuDoGy4gGbw5H5B9uprzmT9e2mBMCNtwHAuAIQARgBIMGM9QI4AFDTlqGOBmDJzreLwKSwEaABzajH-AOqAQo5MDAwMDAwMDIwsgEQZ3cuZ2FtZXdpa2lzLm9yZ7oBCTcyOHg5MF9hc8gBA9oBKWh0dHA6Ly9ndy5nYW1ld2lraXMub3JnL3dpa2kvQ3JlbWVfQnJ1bGVlgAIBqAMByAMF6AP9AugDPugDtAU&num=1&adurl=http://www.GdpChina.com&client=ca-pub-4086838842346968&nm=1074.79.184.66 02:42, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks all.. these have all been reported. It's annoying, because they are all from Google, who were specifically working with us to block gold ads. Possibly the problem is that they don't actually have text to filter out, they are images. But either way, we don't want them of course! I've asked our guy who deals with the ads about this. He'll get in touch with our Google representative for more help. Keep those links coming, and screenshots are welcome too -- Sannse 10:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Isn't there a possibility to disable image ads in the google ads service? That would solve the problem if images can't be filtered through word filters. -- Gem (gem / talk) 12:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
There's a new graphical ad, this time a WoW power leveling service, http://elitewow.com/. It seems like most graphical ads are illegal WoW/GW related ones so disabling them would be a good idea. -- Gem (gem / talk) 22:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/iclk?sa=l&ai=BfVuG_O9mR52OI4X68wHbhsDVC9uprzmT9e2mBMCNtwHAuAIQARgBIMGM9QI4AFDTlqGOBmDJ_rKH3KPcEKABzajH-AOqAQo5MDAwMDAwMDIwsgEQZ3cuZ2FtZXdpa2lzLm9yZ7oBCTcyOHg5MF9hc8gBA9oBVWh0dHA6Ly9ndy5nYW1ld2lraXMub3JnL2luZGV4LnBocD90aXRsZT1HdWlsZFdpa2k6V2lraWFfc3RhZmZfbm90aWNlYm9hcmQmYWN0aW9uPWVkaXSAAgGoAwHIAwXoA_0C6AOnBugD3AU&num=1&adurl=http://www.GdpChina.com&client=ca-pub-4086838842346968&nm=2 Someone really needs to get this thing outta here,it's bugging me,but im too stupid too 4.235.184.216 22:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC) I'm seeing it too

gdpchina.com is now blocked, and the other two reported here... I've no idea why this wiki seems to be more susceptible to these than others... gah. We'll keep on it :) -- Sannse 23:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Maybe it's because its for an MMORPG, whose players are possible customers for them. Fortunately, most of the players that use this wiki are above buying gold from those sites. --Curse You 05:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Cross Site Scripting, unkonown if bug

I use wikiswitch to switch wikis, If I'm editing a page and hit the switch button, the firefox extention noscript comes up and states that it blocked a cross site scripting issue from gw.gamewikis.org, anything that we can do to change this issue? RT | Talk - A joyous wintersday to all 10:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

That sounds like a n issue with your settings in firefox... I don't know anything about wikiswitch, so can't be sure, but maybe you need to adjust your firefox security settings? -- Sannse 17:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
There tight, noscript is on. RT | Talk - A joyous wintersday to all 12:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

(somewhat) inappropriate ad

The ad for Adult Swim with the half-naked man is hardly appropriate for the wiki, in my opinion.The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.255.226.122 (contribs) .

It's a guy in a bathing suit on a beach. Hardly inappropriate. —JediRogue 00:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

"New Messages"

As seen here, numerous users are getting a "new message" messagebox when this IP gets a message, when it is not their IP --Gimmethegepgun 02:30, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

It's affecting other wikis on Wikia too. They are working on fixing it right now. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 04:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
and Catherine says "please pass on our apologies, it should be better soon." -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 04:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Cool, had a chat with some of the Wikia support guys on their IRC server (hope no-one minds me trying to escalate this), for the technically inclined as far as I can deduce, the problem apparently is that the cache/proxy server (Squid) had a configuration change that caused external Internet IPs to appear as an internal address to the wiki server(s). This in turn confused the heck out of the software as probably was seeing different users on the same IP address (just on different ports), which likely explains why when User talk:10.10.20.183 is updated, multiple users get notified of a new message. Anyway, as noted already, it being fixed. --Wolfie Wolfie sig (talk|contribs) 04:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Since new ppl are gonna keep trying to post on the talk page anyways, I have protected it from anons (it's not gonna make the problem worse, and might make it better). Please discuss the bug and/or the protection here. Since the talk page doesn't correspond to any actual user's IP, protecting that talk page doesn't affect anyone's rights. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 09:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Seems the "converting to internal IP address" issue still exists (see Special:Contributions/10.10.20.183) over 24 hours later, any further updates? --Wolfie Wolfie sig (talk|contribs) 07:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Again, same IP still contributing. Do we know anything else as of yet? Isk8Isk8 18:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
This is warw, I'm getting it directing me to multiple talks which none of them are mine. ~Él Kíngíé (warw)
So in other words, issue is still present and escalating. Is that 10.x.x.x IP causing annon users to be redirected to ALL pages it edits? Edit: Even when pages aren't being edited by that IP, it still gives annon users the new message. It seems to re-occur every 20-30 seconds. Edit again: Seems to instead be based on viewing pages on the wiki. It doesn't occur when I refresh say the main page or RC's, but when I view random pages. Some do it, and some don't. Isk8Isk8 19:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Its now telling me i have new messages and redirecting me to ANYTHING. A minute ago, i had one redirect me to Special:Random.. Even when I'm logged in.. >.< --Warwick sig Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 23:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
I actually haven't encountered this problem yet. I'm not the only one to be unaffected, am I? Felix Omni Signature 23:20, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
I haven't personally seen any 'New messages' boxes apart from those caused on my own talk page. -- Gem (gem / talk) 23:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
I too am not getting the issues. Wonder if it only affects those that have logged-in after the proxy/cache server mis-configuration occurred (and anon contributors of course). Ie, I use the "remember me" option and so have not had to re-login to date since this started. Be interesting to find out if all those registered users that are having the problem have logged-in at some point since this all began. --Wolfie Wolfie sig (talk|contribs) 00:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
I tried logging out and then in again earlier but I still don't see the message. -- Gem (gem / talk) 00:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm, then it appears to be randomly effecting some but not all, probably due to Wikia having a server-farm of proxies and only some were changed before the error was realised. Wonder if browser cookies are used to remember "last known IP address used", and so only once those cookies expire (or are cleared by the user), though would think that could be open to abuse, so would hope not. Be nice if Wikia would use this page, being Wikia staff noticeboard and all, to post a formal status report. *hint hint* :) --Wolfie Wolfie sig (talk|contribs) 00:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

New messages

It *only* appears when I look at images. And its not linked to when the person contributes, they haven't contributed for a while and it happened just now. --Shadowcrest 22:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

It only shows up for me when I log out. Random pages will trigger the "new messages" prompt, and usually the first view of the main pages does as well. I have not seen it as a logged in user as of yet. Isk8Isk8 13:52, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Category:Candidates for deletion bug

currently, if pages are linking to certain un-made/deleted templates, they are candidates for deletion. This appears to be a bug, and because of that I am reporting it. --Warwick sig Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 19:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Just don't link to it, then. Cress Arvein(Talk) 20:37, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
It's an old MediaWiki issue: categorization via templates/transclusions don't immediately update when you alter the transcluded thing. Updating the transcluded categories is a passive task filed into the job queue so that the wiki doesn't just hang to the death when you edit a template that is used by a few hundred articles. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 17:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Pages Not Loading Properly

ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved

While trying to retrieve the URL: http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Trial_by_Fire

The following error was encountered:

   * Socket Failure 

The system returned:

   (24) Too many open files

Squid is unable to create a TCP socket, presumably due to excessive load. Please retry your request.

Your cache administrator is technical@wikia.com. Generated Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:59:10 GMT by www.wikia.com (squid/2.6.STABLE16)

Getting this error when trying to load a good half of the pages on the wiki this morning. Isk8Isk8 16:01, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Another Candy Cane Man Ad

Yet another one of these have slipped by.

http://www.thecandycaneman.biz/?gclid=CIHN0Oqny5ACFUV0OAodJUZ7Ww Isk8Isk8 15:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Loose a point for forgetting to sign, another one for not blocking ads from thecandycanemand.biz. (hosts file ftw) RT | Talk 15:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
There's actually two candycaneman ads, one with Aidan and another with a male Warrior. Cress Arvein(Talk) 15:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Just put: 127.0.0.1 thecandycaneman.biz 127.0.0.1 www.thecandycaneman.biz 127.0.0.1 /thecandycaneman.biz 127.0.0.1 .thecandycaneman.biz into C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts

Clear your dns cache by going start -> run -> "ipconfig /flushdns" (without quotes) and watch the ads dissapear RT | Talk 15:58, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Or download ABP and watch how much faster everything runs and how many less seizures you get from flashing ads! --Gimmethegepgun 18:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
+1, I love ABP Jamster Sig ---Jamster--- 18:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
-3 to gimmme for nicking points withoug permission RT | Talk 18:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Aww :( --Gimmethegepgun 18:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Another thecandycaneman ad slipped in

http://www.thecandycaneman.com/index.php?ref=5&gclid=CK6a177a_ZACFQVFMAodrDMksw Talkyr The Honest 16:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

http://www.thecandycaneman.biz/?gclid=CJSHqMHm_ZACFUV0OAod-jo0oQ -- Brains12Talk 17:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

More

Click for image

Please block:

  • www.guildwarsgoldmoney.com
  • GoldConsulting.org

I thought they already would have been blocked, but somehow they slipped through again for me.

...and could someone check:

  • www.SwordsSwords.com/Guildwars

too? Who the hell is Gaert? Entropy Sig (T/C) 04:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Having trouble accessing the Dwayna's Kiss article

If I search for the above article, or search for just dwayna and follow the link to the page, my browser (firefox) converts the %27 to a _ automatically and I have to manually put the ' into the link to get to the page.. Is anyone else having trouble like this with any article? FoxyUK 03:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Not happening with me. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 03:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorted it, was due to NoScript blocking the link because it was from mIRC (was testing a script). FoxyUK 19:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

NO, I want to see <item>s! NOTHING else!!

Previously this site had pictures of weapons or items but the characters were inappropriate. Some of them had no clothes on, carrying the items. I am sure some user thought that was <insert cliched reference to unconcionable graphic portrayal under the pretense of whim or liberality> but it was just wrong. I hope that the pictures, ANY that feature or should feature things other than the wielding characters show the items and IF they show the characters, that they are fully and appropriately dressed. Users come to the site wanting information about the game and such things are insulting to decent people. Please update the pictures appropriately among your other updates. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 146.187.187.247 (contribs) .

If you take a pic without a wielder, you have no idea how big it is and such, and that can make a big diffrence. Also, armor can disrupt the view of an item, by clipping through, covering it, all that stuff. --- VipermagiSig-- (s)talkpage 19:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
In terms of images showing the details of a particular item skin, the reason that images are typically taken with the characters clothing not showing, is the distraction effect. Showing the skin of an item on a neutral backing focuses all attention on the item, and not the characters armor. And the characters still have clothes on. Nothing in Guild Wars is "naked". There should be no reason to be bothered by the characters "under garments". Also please remember to sign your comments. (Edit conflict... grr Viper) --Aggro Isk8 Sk8 19:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
If you are really disturbed by the images, you can use the official Guild Wars Wiki since they are trying to get renders from ANet to replace all images. Render = the item without any background or character, taken with an external tool by an ANet staff member. -- Gem (gem / talk) 20:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Druid's armour link

The link to view Druits armour from the Morgren page sends you to a page about old prefixes.

And there is a big notice about that being out of date on the top of that page... hmmm... Wikia, get on that!—JediRogue 04:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


The C guy

Another thecandycaneman ad slipped in
http://www.thecandycaneman.com/index.php?ref=5&gclid=CK6a177a_ZACFQVFMAodrDMksw Talkyr The Honest 16:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

http://www.thecandycaneman.biz/?gclid=CJSHqMHm_ZACFUV0OAod-jo0oQ -- Brains12Talk 17:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

And another: http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/imgad?id=CJi3tN2XnKPT4wEQ2AUYTzIIC2-OhtraUAc RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 19:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Severe Wiki Lag + Socket Errors

Ok, for some reason, over the last 10 or so minutes I've experienced severe lag and at least 10 "socket errors." Has anything changed with the wikia servers recently? Also, to other users, has anyone else experienced this? EDIT: I've tested other sites and I've only gotten this lag on GuildWiki (haven't checked other wikia sites) Thoughtful 19 (Talk) 21:08, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Same thing here... took me a few minutes just to load the log in page Silver Sunlight SSunlight 21:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm on #Wikia now RT | Talk 21:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Lol, PvX wiki lost there domain name RT | Talk 21:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean? Thoughtful 19 (Talk) 21:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
pvxbuilds.com redirects to http://72.55.184.5 which is there server. I can't see a domain RT | Talk 21:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
PvXwiki is pvxwiki.com =p Thoughtful 19 (Talk) 21:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Pvxbuilds.com always worked for me RT | Talk 21:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I just use the link on our main page so I wouldn't know. Thoughtful 19 (Talk) 21:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
PvX is fine for me, but Gwiki is very laggy for me right now. Jamster Sig ---Jamster--- 21:44, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
PvX is not wikia RT | Talk 21:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Someone else mentioned it *box* Jamster Sig ---Jamster--- 22:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Local IP again?

Just saw the local 10.10.20.183 make an edit, did block expire, and are we going to block again RT | Talk 18:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I saw it too. It's starting to tick me that I can't directly talk to him (and moreso I don't remember why I wanted to). --- VipermagiSig-- (s)talkpage 19:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Yup, Special:Contributions/10.10.20.183 is back again :( --Wolfie Wolfie sig (talk|contribs) 21:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Questionable Ad

[4]

It's an ad for a particular GW guild's website encouraging people to join them. Since GuildWiki does not endorse or support one guild over any others, it out to be blocked so we don't appear partial to them. Felix Omni Signature 06:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Imho people should know that we have no particular influence over what makes it through Google ads - we don't endorse or condone any of them. We can only request blocking for those which are obviously wrong or deceptive, like GW gold. But yeah, I see your point. I would stop short of blocking anything with "guild" in it, because things like GuildCafe are obviously okay, but...a single guild may be deceptive. Entropy Sig (T/C) 12:39, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

GWiki is down D:

I've gotten a GuildWiki is down message twice because of excess connections today, and twice yesterday. I solved it by repeatedly reloading the page, but it still is annoying. --Gigathrash sig GGiga†ħŕášħ 03:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm busy getting that right now as well, and did yesterday as well --Gimmethegepgun 17:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Ditto for me. This has been happening alot lately, and in the past I never experienced this. Is there a reason for this? Aggro Isk8 Sk8 17:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hmm.... I think I know the root cause... --Gimmethegepgun 17:44, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I lolled at the message... :P --- VipermagiSig-- (s)talkpage 17:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Spam filter

Is hitting me repeatedly just trying to edit Aidan because of the external link on the bottom. Shouldn't it check for external links ADDED, not ones just plain in the text? --Gimmethegepgun 21:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

That's unfortunately how the extension works. anyways, I've added babyhold to MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. Any other admins can also edit the whitelist. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 01:34, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, why aren't we using the same extension as Wikipedia does? They have anons and newly-registered users at least have to pass a visual test if they ADD a new link, and seeing how pretty much every single page there HAS an external, but you don't need to do the test every time, I don't see what the problem is --Gimmethegepgun 17:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
There are two different checks. Unregistered anons are asked to pass a test whenever they add an external. Everyone are blocked from edits containing URLs that are blacklisted. If you go to Wikipedia and login and try adding the following link (I just tried on my own user page), you'll find you'll get the same block:
So, this proves we ARE using the same extension Wikipedia uses. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 17:53, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Another questionable ad

Just saw an ad for a poll for Gay Marriages. Doesn't offend me, but this is not the place to talk about a person's beliefs. This is kind of a touchy topic and I do not want it to offend anyone else. Unindal 16:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Keep, at least it seems an inteligent subject, unlike those "Fight and lvl up" adverts RT 16:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

gold ad

http://www.goldsoon.com

Yes, their banner is for WoW gold, but it is the same thing. Block please...stupid all-graphic ads bypassing filters. Entropy Sig (T/C) 10:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

it's still there --83.182.194.51 13:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

MMO Account purchase add?

http://www.gamewar.com/

Not exactly a gold ad, but against the EULA nonetheless. Rukias Tonarim 02:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Agrees, I've seen this one testing IE8 beta (sucks btw - use this) - delete plz RT 21:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Removing the Build: namespace from Special:Wantedpages

Is it possible? As the page is useless after the Builds wipe RT 12:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

The Wanted Pages is automatically generated from red links. If you want the Build namespace removed from that list, see "What links here" to the red link and manually remove it from every page that links to it, only then it will be gone from Wanted Pages. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 18:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Fine... prepare for spam RT | Talk 18:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Accualy, I can't be bothered, I think the special page is going to be useless then RT | Talk 19:02, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
The namespace can be removed from the Wantedpages server-side, but as far as I know, it's quite risky and would need updating each time there is a significant update to the software. The GWW tried to get a similar thing done with the Guild namespace, but we eventually got it out by changing a few templates. -- Brains12 \ Talk 19:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
would said templates work for here as well, possibly?
Aside from trying something like that, I think it wouldn't be too hard to remove all the red links. At least, not very hard with multiple people working on it, and a bit of time. (whoever said stuff like that had to be finished all in one shot?) I've got to back up my computer today, but I may hop on my laptop later and go to town on Build: links. --GEO-logo Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 21:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Templates wouldn't work here (as far as I know) - it worked on GWW because all the red links came from the alliance nav templates, so certain people found a way to get rid of red links if the page wasn't created. Our Wantedpages works again :D
You could probably take out the links with a bot to save time and trouble, not to mention RC and watchlist spam. -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Problem is, I don't think anyone has a working bot; they'd need to make one and get entropy to make it a bot. --Shadowcrest 22:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Not all of the links are actually to the Build: namespace either, as I just found out. Back before the Build: namespace, it was all in mainspace; when builds got moved, they'd leave redirects. So you would need a bot that looks for profession abbreviations... --GEO-logo Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 22:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
I'd be happy to give bot-status for a project like this, as it is of such monotonous and yet massive scale that no one is ever gonna be bothered to do it. I would code it myself if C++ could be made into MediaWiki code, but oh well. Entropy Sig (T/C) 01:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Should we move this conversation to adminnotice board or community portal? -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 01:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I think community portal. --Shadowcrest 01:33, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Scoot it to the 'Portal, perhaps someone would like to code the bot from there, etc. --GEO-logo Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 01:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Incredebly Lag

Guildwiki has been lagging this morning, with me taking over 30 seconds to load a page, normally I can download 140kb/s, so it's not on my end, and the rest of the internet is working fine.--Gigathrash 20:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Seconded. Even the wikia site is experiencing extreme lag. I went over there to see if there was any kind of notice or something informing us that they were having issues, ect. But to no avail. Wikia is worse than Crapcast -- Isk8 Sk8 (T)(C) 20:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Me thinks DoS Thoughtful 19 12:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Me thinks you dumb, who would DoS GuildWiki? Absolutly no point to risk fines and imprisonment. 24.18.131.180 14:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Again today, I am experiencing ridiculously long load times for this wiki. Unlike the last time, Wikia's home page is loading just fine. It's so bad that Firefox is timing out half the time instead of loading pages. -- Isk8 Sk8 (T)(C) 16:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I would also like to add, that this vastly affects our userbase too. I've seen many users get fed up with loading times, and go to the other wiki] instead. I don't think this is what we want, now is it? Please can we get someone to address this issue? -- Isk8 Sk8 (T)(C) 16:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I admit, I actually just used the official wiki because this one is misbehaving. Fix it plz. Felix Omni Signature 16:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Am I the only one who seems to be unaffected by lag? :( Entropy Sig (T/C) 01:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Not the only one, Entropy. I'm not getting any lag at all.--Marcopolo47 signature new (Talk) (Contr.) 01:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
It's only at some times RT 08:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Banned?

Your user name or IP address has been blocked by PanSola. The reason given is this: Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "ShesOnly12". The reason given for ShesOnly12's block is: "multi-vandal"

(If this automated message says you have been blocked by Adam.skinner or Rainith for vandalism, it could be due to a known bug. Please wait a few minutes and try again.)

You may email PanSola or one of the other active administrators to discuss the block. You can find the "e-mail this user" link in the toolbox. Note that you may not use the "e-mail this user" feature unless you have a valid e-mail address registered in your user preferences.

Your IP address is 216.151.156.20. Please include this address in any queries you make.

Keeps popping up when I try to edit my userpage, other people are having the same problem as well. See talk here. --ParadoxicalAmbiance 15:03, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Gold Purchase Ad

Just found an add for goldsoon.com, advertising WoW gold. Probably other MMOs too.

Ad to cause lag

http:://www.grandchase.net/

Ad has multiple moving frames, changing colors, etc. While it does not fit the criteria exactly for an "inappropriate ad", it does tend to slow down the loading of any given page by about 5 seconds. Which annoys me. Entropy Sig (T/C) 20:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Adblock Pro, I don't even bother with ads anymore. --OrgXSignature 20:39, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
I would, but then I couldn't report bad ads. Entropy Sig (T/C) 20:39, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Your job sucks. :P --OrgXSignature 20:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Adblock plus! YAY! RT | Talk 20:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
I have almost forgotten what an ad looked like (ABP ftw!) --Gimmethegepgun 07:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
ABP here too :D We should make a userbox for that. JamJamster Sigster 09:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Account Sale Ad

eliteaccounts.com advertising sale of elite armor chars and etc, I hate Google Ads so much!

Get Adblock Plus like the rest of us if you use FF, if you don't... too bad --Gimmethegepgun 22:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
That's not the point, the point is a fan site for Guild Wars cannot have gold/account/item selling ads. --Macros 22:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I know, but he's also saying that he hates Google Ads, and with ABP they don't even exist any more --Gimmethegepgun 22:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Site loading error

About half of the time that I attempt to load guildwiki, it causes my browser to freeze. This isn't my Browser, as I've tried it in FF and IE as well. Its not my computer either, because I've tried it on my other computer, which is decent, and even that one freezes. As well as that, lately I've been having a lot of error 500 while editing, and having to backspace and retype my comments. —MaySig(P)/(T) 18:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Problem with spam filter

Gamewikis is spam

I was attempting to remove a pointless note and was prevented from doing so on Entangling Asp, twice. I'm not exactly sure what the problem is here, but it seems to me that it's not a good thing. Felix Omni Signature 19:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Just tried it, couldn't edit the main article (same error) but could the heading. Jamster 19:34, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Bloody annoying. —MaySigWarw/Wick 19:37, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Whitelisted, but I have no clue why http://gw.gamewikis got blocked to begin with. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 19:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Bad ads

The side menu advertisement is almost always a gold-selling/game-hacking advertisement. Just a heads up.--Marcopolo47 signature new (Talk) (Contr.) 05:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

please be specific. Whenever I am paying attention, they don't show up. The name of the seller's site would be nice, and if you can go into the source of the page, any kind of advertisement ID would be helpful. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 05:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Maybe you're just unlucky Marco. I don't get 99% bad ads...lots of "questionable" sure, but most are benign. Entropy Sig (T/C) 05:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Odd...now they seem normal. Although I am still getting the ad mentioned below, not sure if that's supposed to be fixed yet. Meh.--Marcopolo47 signature new (Talk) (Contr.) 22:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Naughty Ad

A couple of dolled-up girls with the words "Live chat right now." Seems highly inappropriate. Felix Omni Signature 18:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing that to our attention. I've reported the ad to our advertising controller. -- JSharp 20:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I ran into it again, and took a screenshot; I hope it helps.
Naughty ad
Felix Omni Signature 21:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I just got that ad while looking at this page. Anyone want a screenshot of it appearing twice at the same time?Entrea SumataeEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 22:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Ooh, double the evidence!--Marcopolo47 signature new (Talk) (Contr.) 22:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
But it won't happen to me again, I finally stopped being lazy and got Adblock.Entrea SumataeEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 22:34, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Isn't it nice? :D -- Isk8 Sk8 (T/C) 17:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Is it me, or are they taking racial diversity a bit too far? Slutty white girl, self-confident black girl, and a cute underage asian? Hmmm... Looks like they nailed it. O_o RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 17:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

No images

Since I'm too lazy to repost the problem that I'm having, I'll give you a link to the discussion: User talk:PanSola#Help please. Basically, no images are appearing on my browser.--Marcopolo47 signature new (Talk) (Contr.) 21:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Moar gold

[5]

http://www.pvp-depot.com Felix Omni Signature 08:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

issues and lack of community input

the + tag on the top has been replaced with a big "leave a message tab." that doesn't even make sense... also.. please see GuildWiki_talk:Wikia Migration. I expect these issues to be addressed. —JediRogue 17:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Multiple users are also seeing japanese/chinese/whatever characters and random code instead of normal english text. The site is also lagging seriously due to the ads. This is not how to treat the wiki after all the promises that were made back when you guys bought the wiki. -- Gem (gem / talk) 18:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Jedi: interface text can be fixed from Special:Allmessages. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 20:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Jedi & Gem, Please collect all your issues on the GuildWiki_talk:Wikia Migration page. Several Wikia community team members and engineers have this page watch listed and are working to fix any issues and answer questions as soon as possible. Angies 23:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Meh, we're already fixing half the "problems" on our own, and epically annihilating all the changes Wikia has made --Gimmethegepgun 23:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Gj guys, good to see that someone is doing something right. -- Gem (gem / talk) 20:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I realy don't like wikia going and overwriting mediawiki default... I fixed the + thing btw RT | Talk 20:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Stupidly long loading time

On each page, its taking about 5 minutes to load each page, which is pretty much unacceptable. And the cause of it is the ads.. My .js takes at least 1 minute to load for each page. I'm in the middle of typing somthing, and suddenly the screen will shoot up because of my extra links. I'm going to test the monaco skin, and I'm pretty sure there arn't these problems on the monaco? Is it because Wikia doesn't want us to use the monobook skin? —MaySigWarw/Wick 16:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Maybe it is just you. I'm on a bad Wireless connection and IE, but am not having 5 minute loading times. Entropy Sig (T/C) 22:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
She meant half a minute. Forgot where she mentioned that, but the stated it was closed to 30-40 than 5 minutes, so to say... /memoryfail --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 14:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Entropy, I'm using a wired connection. And its fixed now; Turns out it was those ads like I thought it was. —MaySigWarw/Wick 14:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

foo

http://www.PvP-Depot.com/

It may be case sensitive, I can't tell. They are advertising WoW gold, but still. Entropy Sig (T/C) 07:50, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Felix reported that, look up RT | Talk 07:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Oops. Also, I apologize for not creating a new section. Shame on me. Entropy Sig (T/C) 08:12, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

problem reports

not sure how to post this because its about the reports themselves. I've tried it in both IE and FF and when I click on the button it doesn't pop up. I'm not sure if its me or if its some setting but I'm not sure why it would suddenly stop working and in both browsers. —JediRogue 03:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

they dont work. if they arent gonna work why do we have the tab?? 130.245.23.70 23:25, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
I have reported the bug. Thanks for the heads-up. --KyleH (talk) 04:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
For the record, I just realized that they work in Monaco but not Monobook. —JediRogue 04:19, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, the extension is not compatible with the custom GuildWiki version of Monobook. Since that version is the default skin, I went ahead and disabled the extension for the time being just to avoid confusion. --KyleH (talk) 15:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
So that explains how it worked with the Wikia version and monaco. Are you guys planning on adding it to our monobook eventually? Is there some way to manually create a problem report that doesn't involve that popup?—JediRogue 16:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I remember it working before in Monobook, don't see why it won't work now --Gimmethegepgun 17:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
From my understanding: There's a difference bwteen Gravewit's Monobook, and Wikia's Monobok. Only the Wikia monobook has been modified to work with the extension. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 17:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
That is correct. Unfortunately, we will not be able to add it to the GuildWiki version of Monobook. If and when you guys get to the point where you are comfortable setting Monaco as the default theme for anonymous users, then it would make sense to turn in it back on. --KyleH (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

game updates

hey, i clicked on the updates and read the news. but, when i decided to post my own thoughts on the 'edit' page, i noticed something strange. the 'edit' page's content and the 'discussion' pages content, are not matching. there are more posts on the edit page, and when i switch back to discussion, they are not there. is anybody else experiencing this? or is it my computer?68.187.16.3 02:53, 18 April 2008 (UTC) Gabe

Maby someone added a message between the opening of the page and opening of the edit page? In that case you wouldn't see the message on the discussion page since itwasn't there when you loaded it, and then after you hit the link to the edit page the edit window shows the message since it has been added at that point. If you then hit the back button in the browser to move to the talk page in normal mode, the browser will show the version that it loaded previously, not the up to date version. You need to hit f5 to refresh the page to see updated content in that case. -- Gem (gem / talk) 10:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I've had this happen on talk pages before. RoseOfKali RoseOfKaliSIG 15:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I bet you were just confused by the modular nature of the game updates article. Each individual update is its own article, and they are all "included" onto the overall Game updates page. Each update has its own talk page, as does the overall page. You were probably looking at Talk:Game updates to start with, then after you clicked on an "edit" link and went back to "discussion" you were looking at Talk:Game_updates/20080417. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken 20:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

more bad ads

[6] Image is: http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/imgad?id=CJau2pvXo-adSBDYBRhPMghiepvrJ5FqTA Block? :) —HelloWarw/Wick 20:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

site notice

I don't see the site notice when I'm logged in. Does dismissing it once permanently dismiss it? Because that doesn't seem like a good idea. And IDK if I dismissed it ever even. —JediRogue 20:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

I just incremented the sitenotice id. Is it back? In general, clearing your own cookies will bring it back. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 20:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes, its back. Good call. —JediRogue 20:45, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Zombie Strippers

Zombiestrippers [7] Pretty unacceptable, it's showing up on most pages. Felix Omni Signature 17:14, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Passing the message along to get it removed. Thanks. --KyleH (talk) 20:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
It's still there. Felix Omni Signature 03:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
eww the link is scary its not actually bad (i only clicked the link once) just more creepy Lost-Blue 03:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Footer

On the site's footer, the words are:

  • This page was last modified (date)
  • GFDL
  • Privacy policy
  • About GuildWiki
  • Disclaimers

Mistake on the GFDL part, we are, and always have been creative commons Thoughtful's RT sig test + Talk 05:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Screenshot? The Monaco footer doesn't appear for me at all (cept teh spotlights), whereas Monobook shows the CC BY-NC-SA banner for me. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 06:33, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
This issue should be resolved. Let me know if you find anywhere else that displays the incorrect text. --KyleH (talk) 06:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

deleted pages

is it a new thing that deleted pages are getting their entire history removed from recent changes? I know that it gets removed from a person's list of contributions but removing it from RC makes it annoying to go back and figure out who made it after it was deleted if I wanted to ban them or something. Also... didn't I read somewhere about an option to protect non-existing pages to keep them from being created? —JediRogue 17:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

They've always disappeared from RC. -- Gem (gem / talk) 17:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
If you "recreate" the page (going to the Edit) it shows a small link which shows deleted versions. There, you can see who edited it last, and thus who made it. --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 17:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


The easiest way to prevent pages from being created is to use cascading protection. Create a page with links to page names that you want protected from creation, then protect that page with cascading protection (it's a check box on the protect page screen). Doing so will protect all pages linked from that page. --KyleH (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2008 (UTC)