Redundancy
See GuildWiki_talk:Community_Portal#Admin_noticeboard_and_requests_for_comment. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- The topic that Barek refers to can only be found in the history here, it is not useful or possible to comment upon the Admin noticeboard there instead of here (but it was at the time that Barek wrote the comment), yet Viper feels that it is somehow important that this totally useless, misleading comment be left standing in its untainted glory. So be it, then. mendel 12:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- The fact is, we normally forbid people to remove comments, and as such I have reverted you. ---
-- (s)talkpage 12:22, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- The fact is, we normally forbid people to remove comments, and as such I have reverted you. ---
- The fact is, admins normally use common sense. mendel 12:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- I was using common sense; Treat one the same as the other. Point is: Don't remove comments, however wrong and old they are. Exceptions are bad, cause you can treat everything as an exception, and there'll eventually be no limit to deleting content, because it's an exception. --- -- (s)talkpage 12:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Use your heads and just archive it. --90.196.43.141 12:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- I was using common sense; Treat one the same as the other. Point is: Don't remove comments, however wrong and old they are. Exceptions are bad, cause you can treat everything as an exception, and there'll eventually be no limit to deleting content, because it's an exception. ---
- Archive 240 bytes...? O_o' --- -- (s)talkpage 12:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- It is not in any way useful to have an archive of that comment beyond what the wiki archives in its history anyway. mendel 12:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Archive 240 bytes...? O_o' ---