m (→Move) |
m (→Move: ugh, edit conflict) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:You need to jump over to wikipedia and tell them they are wrong =P. There are exceptions to the comments limited to talk pages rule. [[GuildWiki:Community_Portal|Discussion pages]] (for instance) can be signed. --[[User:Draygo Korvan|Draygo Korvan]] 16:18, 12 June 2006 (CDT) |
:You need to jump over to wikipedia and tell them they are wrong =P. There are exceptions to the comments limited to talk pages rule. [[GuildWiki:Community_Portal|Discussion pages]] (for instance) can be signed. --[[User:Draygo Korvan|Draygo Korvan]] 16:18, 12 June 2006 (CDT) |
||
| + | |||
| − | :You need to jump over to wikipedia and tell them they are wrong =P. There are exceptions to the comments limited to talk pages rule. [[GuildWiki:Community_Portal|Discussion pages]] (for instance) can be signed. --[[User:Draygo Korvan|Draygo Korvan]] 16:18, 12 June 2006 (CDT) |
||
| + | ::WP uses [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages]], which I think is fine. I have no idea whythe old <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki> here linked to that oddly named article –[[user:seventy.twenty.x.x|70.20]]<sup>[[user talk:seventy.twenty.x.x|☎]]</sup> 16:25, 12 June 2006 (CDT) |
||
Revision as of 21:25, 12 June 2006
Draft
I have transcribed a draft from Wikipedia:Please sign your talk pages. Because some of the recommendations on wikipedia differ from the communities ideas. So in order to better facilitate the discussion, and to prevent confusion, I have transcribed over a majority of the article. --Draygo Korvan 14:09, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
- The article name sounds like it's only asking me to sign User talk:PanSola... -User:PanSola (talk to the
) 14:50, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
- Well ... I copied the article, including the name from wikipedia - and cut out the section that is a bit controversial (even on wikipedia). On wikipedia it is considered a guideline, not a rule. And I dont think we will be using it to ban users here either. --Draygo Korvan 14:56, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
Move
- Please sign your comments on talk pages
- Please sign your comments
- Sign your comments on talk pages
- Sign your comments
- Please sign your talk pages (as-is)
I would go for #2, I prefer shorter article names. The user can read into the start of the article to get the whole idea. --Draygo Korvan 15:52, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
- I agree, short and to the point. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:54, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
- Two looks good to me too. (Yay, I used all three versions of the word in that sentance.) --Rainith 16:06, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
I think 1 is the clearest because it is not immediately obvious that comments are limited to talk pages. However, I have no strong opinions here except to be against #5, which is just wrong. –70.20☎ 16:14, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
- You need to jump over to wikipedia and tell them they are wrong =P. There are exceptions to the comments limited to talk pages rule. Discussion pages (for instance) can be signed. --Draygo Korvan 16:18, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
- WP uses Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages, which I think is fine. I have no idea whythe old {{unsigned}} here linked to that oddly named article –70.20☎ 16:25, 12 June 2006 (CDT)