Progger12420@legacy41695098 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In my opinion, the part on unique articles which says "This weapon carries the same stats as this and this and this unique weapon" is quite redundant. The same information can be found on [[Warrior_unique_items_quick_reference|this page]], for example. I'm going to remove these parts, if anyone objects, please give a yell. --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] - <small>[[User_talk:Progger|talk]]</small> 11:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC) |
In my opinion, the part on unique articles which says "This weapon carries the same stats as this and this and this unique weapon" is quite redundant. The same information can be found on [[Warrior_unique_items_quick_reference|this page]], for example. I'm going to remove these parts, if anyone objects, please give a yell. --[[Image:Progr.jpg]] - <small>[[User_talk:Progger|talk]]</small> 11:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | - |
||
| + | ==Reactivate== |
||
| + | How can I get this reactivated? seems like an ideal project and I have a general idea of how with my sandbox. [[User:Ariyen|Ariyen]] 01:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 01:56, 16 April 2011
Discuss. --
-- talkpage 22:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Have fun with it, looks good. ---
-- (s)talkpage 18:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
In my opinion, the part on unique articles which says "This weapon carries the same stats as this and this and this unique weapon" is quite redundant. The same information can be found on this page, for example. I'm going to remove these parts, if anyone objects, please give a yell. --
- talk 11:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
-
Reactivate
How can I get this reactivated? seems like an ideal project and I have a general idea of how with my sandbox. Ariyen 01:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC)