GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
Advertisement

Give me the screenshot, and I won't delete this page. Cress Arvein(Talk) 19:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Screenshot needs to be uploaded and evidense added before I get back from eating, or will be wiped RT 19:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
The everlasting transmogrifier has been confirmed as real already and there is already an article on that. Delete plixplox. --Progr -- talkpage 19:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
About that: Only the ones from Halloween and Rollerbeetle have been confirmed. Try searching it. --- VipermagiSig-- (s)talkpage 19:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
(ec) 2 things: if it is real, it's either Transmogrifying OR Yuletide. Second, yuletide is spelled wrong. --Macros 19:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
It would be called Everlasting Yuletide Tonic, methinks. But, that aside, we have nothing on this... --- VipermagiSig-- (s)talkpage 19:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
So either way, the name is wrong. Delete! --Macros 19:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Post the screenshot please, you can blank out names and whatnot. As long as it looks real, we'll add it (and then debate about it again :P ) and move this to a proper name and give it a good format, otherwise this page will be deleted in the near future --Gimmethegepgun 19:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete away! Yikey 19:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Ooops it said in my summary I voted with Cress >.< Originally I did but I changed my mind. Thought I'd leave a note to make sure my vote's considered in the right place. :) Saul Lachance 19:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Someone's selling one one High End guru here. Cropped off his screen: Everlasting Yuletide Tonic confirmation Jennalee 06:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Gfg me, appears to be legit. Banned from guru or I'd check it out myself.-American Wrath|Talk 06:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Since a mod nuked the original post with the screen, the original shot minus names here. Jennalee 13:08, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
You might be able to guess who it is from that shot ^^
Well I never! It exists! And I thought that guy was having us on >.< Shame he sold it for 35k, coulda made a fair bit. Saul Lachance 22:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
There is still a chance it's not real after all... apparently Scooby has been spreading info about this and people who know him have told me he photoshopped it. I'll make this claim: It's not real til a GWW official has seen it in game.-American Wrath//Talk 23:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

I've seen this with the Legendary Defender of Ascalon (which I have) all the everlasting tonics. Anything that A-net doesn't just come out and say in an official message, you (the general community) rush at an incredible rate to declare fake. Then when proven wrong, nobody hears a peep out of you even though you've spent so much time ridiculing and accusing others of photo-shopping and deceiving you when you asked for proof. I would think that in the future, you might want to drop the piousness and simply add a "questionable until further proof provided" tag to the articles that you aren't sure about. Iso cyanate 14:47, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion[]

Will be deleted/kept when majority is reached.
This deletion debate has stopped, there is confirmation by a regular, trusted user RT 06:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep[]

  1. Jennalee 06:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. ok ok lol. saw that screen—JediRogue 06:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. --Marcopolo47 signature new (Talk) (Contr.) 22:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
    Marco, read the top of this section, it's been confirmed :p JamJamster Sigster 22:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
    All the more reason to keep :P--Marcopolo47 signature new (Talk) (Contr.) 22:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete[]

  1. RT 19:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Delete. When evidence is provided someone can properly formulate a page on it. Saul Lachance 19:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. Name sounds like bull, and the person could have been a vandal OR it may have been an accident. As far as I know, no item on guildwars can do two things (Beer cant be drunk and drunk three times, if you see what I mean). —♥May♥Wick♥ 19:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. delete. We can add it when the item is confirmed to exist. atm this page has no information. —JediRogue 02:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
  5. [me=pwnd]Delete. Although the probability of this item being legit is existent, there is absolutely no evidence to support it. Perhaps a .dat troll can provide some insight. Just because the other two tonics are real does not mean we can safely assume that this one is as well.[\me=pwnd]-American Wrath|Talk 02:46, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Neutral[]

  1. Move it to a correct title when we get the screenshot. Cress Arvein(Talk) 19:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  2. Agree with Cress. An everlasting yuletide item definitely exists, but until we know what it is actually called we can't do much. Felix Omni Signature 19:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  3. it is a plausible item, waiting for the screenshot. No screenshot, no article. --- VipermagiSig-- (s)talkpage 19:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  4. Agreed again. I don't think it's been claimed by anyone yet, but it's something that will probably come sometime soon. Mr. Mango 02:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Here is the origional Screen Shot as I am the one who sold it and it was my post that was nuked. Hope I did this right as I never posted an image here before.

[IMG]EverlastingYuleetide.jpg[/IMG]


Have no idea how to post an image sorry but that is what I used to get it on my wiki post

Advertisement