Talk: Game updates/Archive9

Archives

---

1. Archive 1 ~ Sept. 25, 2006 - July 27, 2006
2. Archive 2
3. Archive 3
4. Archive 4

Older update obsidian chest change

Sometime this year, I believe there has been a change to the way obsidian chests work in FoW. I recently completed a clearing of FoW where we cleared THEN we finished quests. During clearing, there were 2 obsidian chests. After we started taking/finishing quests more obsidian chests spawned at various locations around FoW. Once we had finished all the quests, we ran a victory lap looking for more chests, and came up with a total of 7. Now, I had done this once before (clear->quests) and I noted no such dearth of chests that time.

I suspect it is a change, but I don't know when (I hadn't FoW'ed in probably a month, and I our usual behavior down there is to take the quests as they become available rather than saving them all for the end).

I plan on doing a similar clear of UW to see if that behaves this way as well, but I'm curious if anyone else has documented this behavior before? -- Oblio (talk) 12:03, 7 March 2007 (CST)

It's happening in Domain of Anguish as well. There are very few chests, and more spawn depending on finishing quests (and/or killing monsters?). I think that's Anet's response to chest running, which is a very boring activity that is really unfair to those people who actually go through the work of killing stuff, instead of just running around. I say it's a good thing. NightAngel 13:29, 7 March 2007 (CST)

This explains why UW is so empty of chests nowdays. It must be the same thing. -- (talk) 14:17, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Previously to that FoW run, I had recently done 1 UW clearing run (almost no quests) and found it to be mostly empty as well (2 chests throughout all except the spawning pools (which we didn't do based on time). Unfortunately, to test this, you have to clear first then quest, which will be much more difficult to test in UW since my prefered testing team is a 2man-BP and minions don't teleport. Regarding DoA, I have only spent time in Gloom, and the very few chests that seemed to be available now seem to be gone (but that is a lot of "seem"). With regard to "good or bad", I will refrain from editorializing here. -- Oblio (talk) 14:34, 7 March 2007 (CST)

I haven't seen chests in UW for ages now, so this must be an old update. -- (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2007 (CST)

For gloom, particularly, it is very common for a chest to appear at the Rift after you capture it and finish the Closing the Rift reward. Or to get a demonic chest to appear together with the Ravenheart chest when you finish killing the Darknesses, etc. I've seen it in Veil too. I think it is something new, this "chests appear as you finish quests" thing. And why not editorialize, this is the talk page, we can surely share our opinions here. I wouldn't put "and that's a good thing" on the update page, which should stay clean and factual, but this is a good place as any to comment on it :) NightAngel 16:22, 7 March 2007 (CST)

I put notes in the February 14th update about what happened to the chests. --Karlos 20:00, 7 March 2007 (CST)

I see. What about the FoW and UW changes? Should we just not add them? -- (talk) 04:07, 8 March 2007 (CST)

The note, if you read it carefully does say that ALL chest spawns in the game have changed. I don't think further elaboration is needed on that note. --Karlos 14:34, 8 March 2007 (CST)

I added the word "all" into that sentence to clear it up. Good enough for me. -- Oblio (talk) 14:46, 8 March 2007 (CST)

Regarding UW a full run through questing (avoided servants of grenth and horseman quest) i only found two chests with one in Chaos Planes and other in Spawning Pool. I didn't see a change with ecto as the party received a healthy drop of 12-14 ecto.

Again regarding UW, I think this change has been round for quite a while, about a month ago there was a huge drop in the number of chests i found on ele UW runs, used to be at least 1 per run but now theres about 1 every 5 runs

I did 5 Chest Run in FoW yesterday. The big amount of chest (without quest) was 4, the less 0. I think it's very depend but yes Anet removed a lot of chest. --Benoit flageol 12:12, 13 March 2007 (CDT)

Yea sometimes chests spawn when killing monsters in FoW our group was in the middle of the quest ([The Eternal Forgemaster]) Once we cleard the patch to the main gate the chest appeared...--Dr.D 10:56, 16 March 2007 (CDT)

Perhaps with the free UW/FoW access coming up tis weekend it would be a good time to test and prove these ideas?

Already prooved. --Benoit flageol 18:07, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

March 1st Update

← moved to Talk:Game updates/20070301#Game updates

March 6th Update

← moved to Talk:Game updates/20070306#Game updates

March 7th Update

← moved to Talk:Game updates/20070307#Game Updates

March 13th Update

← moved to Talk:Game updates/20070313#Game updates

March 20th Update

Your qualified character will have access to UW and FoW.... They mean acended ? --Benoit flageol 20:49, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

I would assume so. — kyrasantae 20:56, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

Or Weh no Su, or Nightfall characters who completed Hunted!. -- Gordon Ecker 21:04, 20 March 2007 (CDT)

Yes yes and yes, see the scribe. --Armond Warblade (talk) 20:07, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

Seems odd to me that ANet is promoting high-level farming. 82.17.103.240 03:54, 21 March 2007 (CDT)

I don't think that's just for farming purpose.. in the opposite, there is a lot of XP and quests to do in theses areas, not just simple farm.. And it will also let people from regions that hasn't big window of favor to go to theses maps in the normal way to play them.. :) — Corsaire 04:00, 21 March 2007 (CDT)

I think it's to decrease the price of glob of ectos and obsidians shards in a over farming. --Benoit flageol 10:18, 21 March 2007 (CDT)

No, ANet have no interest whatsoever in decreasing prices for high-end items. I've heard rumors about ANet killing the favor system altogether. This is most probably the test weekend before the actual change. This would make sense on multiple levels, and the first that comes to mind is to allow Japan and (*)China access to these areas.   — n00kie (ping) 11:31, 21 March 2007 (CDT)

I would consider this change rather "ho-hum". I constantly hear people say "I'm going to switch over to Europe so I can get favor FOREVER!!!", but what's the point? As an American, I've never really had a problem getting into the UW and FoW when I need to, and there have been few (very few) times when I just NEEDED to get in there when we didn't have favor. I tend to not see Japan and China on the board, so I can see the positive change there. It just seems easier to keep the favor system, but also have team-based PvE challenges to ALSO allow favor (or, at least, entrance). I'm also okay with them allowing for multiple favor, as well.

As a mostly PvE player, I think it's highly unfair to base some aspects of PvE (read access to high-level areas) on something PvE players have absolutely no control over. This is made much worse by the fact that the only territories I ever see with favor are Europe, America and rarely Korea (and it's been a while). —Khudzlin 14:57, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

If they do away with favor completely, however, what is the point of HoH, other than for some weapon skins? --Mystisteel 13:47, 21 March 2007 (CDT)

From an HA player's perspective I really don't think it was ever about favor. I mean, I've never heard of any happening where a guild/group of friends wanted to do FoW/UW and asked their guildmates/friends to go win them favor.   — n00kie (ping) 13:55, 21 March 2007 (CDT)

The only people who do that (read: myself) never get a good group and die on the first PvP map there. --Armond Warblade (talk) 14:21, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

Unfortunately I'm gone all weekend for some book publishing business(es). So I wont be able to participate in this. My thought was that they may stay with this idea (as long as one is ascended, they can pay 1k to go into the FoW or UW, regardless of territory). This would probably reduce the ecto/shard rate (or ANet could keep the same price, but reduce the chances of getting one even more). Or perhaps they might stick with this idea and open up a new region? (available to those with favor). that'd be a thought.--Ambuu 16:02, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

Decrease the price = good idea. Decrease the chance of drop = bad idea.. its already at 2% for smites and 4% for Attaxes. But I'm okay with a regardless on territory for favor. --Benoit flageol 18:06, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

You don't even have to pay the 1k this weekend. --Armond Warblade (talk) 20:07, 22 March 2007 (CDT)

29th's silent update

At least two skill descriptions have changed although their actual effects have not. See Talk:Crippling Slash and this edit to Pestilence. I'm not motivated enough to look through other skills to see if anything else was touched. --Fyren 04:54, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

HA party size of 8 also. And looking at GWW it's supposed to stay 8. No word on the skills :/ — Poki#3 , 05:24, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

I was playing with my Paragon last night and noticed something I was happy to see. My echos (Mending/Agressive refrain) were being re-applied by ALL shouts and chants, even if they were in place before the last time the echo was applied. Before the update if I had a shout on me that was in place before I put up my echo, the echo was not re-applied when that shout/chant ended, so I had to always make sure I had a "newer" shout/chant (newer than the last echo) up each time the echo applied. Very glad they fixed this. --Tom128 10:17, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

I take back that above comment. I swear it was working last night, but it was not doing it for me today. I know I was not that tired... --Tom128 17:31, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

Try using a key on a locked chest and you will see part of the code "Use KeyCancel". --Some Random Anon —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.64.22.111 (contribs) 17:26, 30 March 2007.

I think this might be a formatting error in the dialog. "Use Key" and "Cancel" may be associated with the 2 buttons. 75.89.77.39 22:52, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

Update isn't silent anymore, it's on the website. Also add under the notes the Keycancel things introduced when opening chests.Jelmewnema 13:07, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

So I'm assuming it's double faction in HA only? CannibalBob 21:22, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

2007-3-30 Silent Update

Anyone know what's happening here with this update? -- Tarun 23:54, 30 March 2007 (CDT)

At the very least they changed the descriptions I mentioned before back to normal. --Fyren 00:12, 31 March 2007 (CDT)

Check Kamadan, Lion Arch and Shing Jea. And look at your character. Surprise! §: TůζipVõrζąx Talk 04:11, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

April's Fools... -Cel

keycancel

does not appeatr anymore, or at least not on phantom chests.

Nor canthan chests. --Armond Warblade (talk) 06:49, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Nor Obsidian Chest. --Benoit flageol 11:12, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

1st April 07

There was a stealth update on this day. Characters at Lion's Arch]] and Kamadan change sex. It should be written here even if it isn't on GW official page? --Glenn 07:43, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Confirmed that this is also occurring at Shing Jea Monastery today. But more importantly, has anyone seen anything else odd? I'm thinking there probably are some other more subtle pranks laid by those Anet folk and that they wouldn't settle for just the gender change. -- Mike Arms 12:25, 1 April 2007 (CDT)

Maybe Lucky Aura will actually do something for once.... ;-) Argel 00:36, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

There wasn't anything yesterday except for gender change Timir222 10:38, 2 April 2007 (GMT)

Perhaps it was just an april fools joke?--66.66.11.47 20:16, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Next up on Captain Obvious TV: We are using the internet! –Ichigo724 20:23, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

Stop mocking the new users! And to 66.66.11.47, yes, it was an April Fools joke. -- <!--Zerris--> 20:25, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

I love captain obvious and his henchmen! Sirocco 17:06, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

command post spirit

I just realized the toxicity spirit that was dropped by the smuggler in the command post does happen any more, when was that changed? -- Xeon 07:23, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

Never mind there he goes and drops it again -- Xeon 08:05, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

lol. --Benoit flageol 17:00, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

Getting the same update its a big 'un.. loading on both PCs and the DL time is SLOWWWwwwwww....

The bear

I want have a bear like pet, how I can do?

(je veux avoir un ours comme, familier comment puis-je faire?)

Charm Animal, usually. Bears are easily found in the Southern Shiverpeaks and in Pre-Searing. -Auron 22:10, 5 April 2007 (CDT)

april update

it changed the mask for 15k canthan assassin armour (male at least)... I'll post pics on the page to show it ~Soqed Hozi~ 11:39, 6 April 2007 (CDT)

April 05 Update

← moved to Talk:Game_updates/20070405#Apr_5_update

6th's silent update

← moved to Talk:Game_updates/20070406

Greek Text

When was support for this added? was it with the russian text. It wasnt there before--213.7.48.114 17:00, 7 April 2007 (CDT)

Easter goodies?

I haven't run across mention of the eggs and bunnies that are dropping. Did this make it into the wiki?

Golden Egg and Chocolate Bunny. -- (gem / talk) 11:43, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

the update a little while ago

They fixed up the bottom of the text in the chat window with the small interface. -- Xeon 00:23, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

Burst of Aggression has been modified. At 0 Strength, it now lasts 2 seconds. Oscidaes 20:33, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Maybe this will finally spell the death for BoA sins... but probably not. They'll just switch to flurry. -- <!--Zerris--> 20:35, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

I still see no difference how do u lower it from 2-10 if its 2-8 or lamens terms BoA=2-8 so how do u nerf it if its *Decreased* to 2-10?Stevo101 20:50, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

They also nerfed one of the sin attack skills in the chain... to do a whopping 7 less damage... does that spell the death of the boa sin? 66.65.34.242 20:54, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

no but i want an awnser, how do u decrease it if u increased the time..Stevo101 20:56, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Are you retarded? From 5..9 to 2..8 seconds. Bye BoA sin. --[riVen] 21:03, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

They dropped the minimum duration from 5 seconds to 2. --Kale Ironfist 21:02, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

I like these updates. I hated BoA sins and I'm glad those lame ZB monks got hit with the ban-stick, too. Cheap builds.--CannibalBob 23:45, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

boa sins sucked anyway, too little durability, hopfully this will bring them to their senses, that boa is a waste of time, it does NOTHING! btw, flurry will decrease their damaage, so that nub to use, and well, those nub-ass boa sins...if they dont come round they obviously even more n00b than i first thought, which is prettty n00b. ~Soqed Hozi~ 22:30, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Hint: Flurry only affects base damage. Assassins do about 40 base damage and about 400 bonus damage in a combo, so that's only gonna drop it off by 10 dmg or so. -- <!--Zerris--> 22:42, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Zerris is correct, which is why I always used flurry anyway. Being able to attack faster 100% of the time is greater than 5 seconds of the time, despite doing ~10-15 damage less (in those 5 seconds, not per attack). But then again, I don't follow a cookie cutter build anyway.Cyrogenic 13:56, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Other than BoA sin news, anyone feel that they nerfed most classes except for Necros? They reduced energy cost in a few skills. I can see that Anet not going to give us back freedom in Soul Reaping, but in time I can see the majority of necro skills having a cheap energy cost.

Paragons didn't get touched :D:D--CannibalBob 23:45, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

They ran out of things to nerf for Paragons, that's why. -- <!--Zerris--> 23:54, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Hahaha, hey guys, lets go make "Incoming!"last for half a second now lol. Readem (talk*contribs) 13:56, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Stop giving them ideas.  ;-) Cyrogenic 13:59, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Just for the heck of it... they double-spaced quest steps Lostage 22:53, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

April 10, 2007 updates

Nerco changes
Surely the energy cost decreases are to offset the Soul Reaping nerf. But these changes don't come nearly close enough to compensate. --Mooseyfate 23:09, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

I wouldn't mind the soul reaping nerf if all the necro's skills didn't cost 15 energy. A few of em got moved down to 10, its a start.Death Queen Arabess 23:20, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

As far as I can tell, the objective was to stop every single healer in Heroes' Ascent from being Necromancer Primary, and to leave the healing to the real monks. -- <!--Zerris--> 23:22, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah the HB necros were getting a little nuts --Lania Elderfire 23:35, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

The SR nerf did not bother me much when I played my Necro, but this buff... :o I'm more powerful in PvE than before! -- 82.169.153.174 06:20, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah PvE >.>, they nerfed necro because of PvP in the first place -.- --Birchwooda Treehug 10:35, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Guild wars won't start

My guild wars hasn't been starting and I think it's because of this new "update" (I use quotes because it doesn't even load). Has anybody else experienced this problem or know how to fix it? -Isi

Probaly a stupid responce but have you installed new anti virus software recently without oking the guild wars app.? My guild wars wont open once it tries to update without me allowing it through the norton firewall.--Sefre 00:36, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

I'm having the same problem, and no, I havn't installed anything new. It was working fine until after the update. - Sorrows_Flame

Improved Storage

When did they improve the storage size? It's awesome - but I must have missed the update note on it! Kind Regards (Girion 08:47, 11 April 2007 (CDT))

lol? Game_updates/20070405 — Poki#3 , 09:41, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

I must have completely bypassed that one - but it is sweet! Just send my mule to the graveyard.. RIP and Kind Regards (Girion 09:53, 11 April 2007 (CDT))

Skill Balances

Is it just me or does Anet not know what they want to do. They keep buffing skills only to nerf them again. Crazy. 68.226.178.120 23:57, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

it's not easy being Random --Honorable Sarah 23:59, 13 April 2007 (CDT)

When you buff new skills you expect them to be changed after so they fit better into the overall game. -- Xeon 00:26, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

Conjure Line Nerfed

Good or bad? I say bad because who uses conjures in PvP? I thought the balances was all about making PvP "fair."

Your kidding... All warrs have been using this since its buff in pvp, this skill is not widely used in PvE at all. -- Xeon 01:26, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

Flame is used with barrage and Mark of Rodgort. --Armond Warblade (talk) 02:00, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

Although conjures where nerfed a bit, the're still very good. Check the history of those skills and se how they where before any buff. Horror. — Poki#3 , 09:07, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

Wow, you don't play GvG's, do you? 3/4 of builds involved W/E or D/E or sometimes A/E with Conjure Flame + Mark of Rodgort... - (Abedeus) 13:02, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

And to think, when i posted a W/E build using mark of rodgort, and conjure flame, it got deleted almost instantly lol. I've been running builds like that for months, Conjure Flame adds for nice dmg, but in my opinion, the burning is what makes it work. It adds wonderfull pressure as you are wackin em with your sword(adding bleeding and gash to the mix of course :D ). Death Queen Arabess 13:33, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

Any W/E Rodgort build + Conjure usually gets deleted immediately because there are much better ways to utilize the combo...Mark of Rodgort is 15 expensive energy, especially for a Warrior, and a lot of those Conjure builds put anywhere from 8-12 ranks to Fire magic just for Conjure/Mark. Which is complete silliness...It's fine to stick leftover points into Conjure for some nice, easy bonus damage. But if you don't have your typical PvP frontliner utilities - speedbuff or snare, deepwound, condition removal if possible, maybe selfheal, etc - then you're not going anywhere anyways. Sever + Gash + Conjure + Mark is an okay combo at best, nothing spectacular. (T/C) 14:47, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

Don't people remove enchantments these days? The un-nerfed Conjure spells had fairly long recharges-30 seconds--CannibalBob 16:06, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah, mark is 15 energy, and conjure is 10, but thats what glyph of less energy is for. And that 'okay at beast' combo of sever+gash+conjure+mark, rapes sins and warroirs in seconds. Who doesn't want to deal -9 degen and deep wound, while maintaining the ability to wack people with your sword. And yeah, the build has counters, but so does every god damn build you use, whats your point. The only time i've ever lost a scrimmage match using my conjure/mark build, was against a derv using mystic regen. Problem is, all you fucking morons that are deciding which builds are good and which aren't, are a bunch of stuck up, head up your ass morons, who wouldn't know a good build if it fucked your mom in the ass. I'm sick of all you 'elite' PvPers saying what builds suck, and which don't, cause guess what, my conjure/mark warroir build probably kick the shit outta your warroir or sin, or w/e other melee you wanna fight me with. The killer in the build is the degen, not conjure flame, enchant removal might remove a few points of dmg, but you're still giving the other guy -6 degen, and -9 after sever, and deep wound after gash. Death Queen Arabess 12:21, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

Lolz, must be an RA fan. Ever heard of Cripslash warrior? (T/C) 12:33, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

Also, keep GW:NPA and GW:YAV in mind. –Ichigo724 12:55, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

Warriors do not have skill slots to waste on inferior effects. Conjure Warriors are already at a disadvantage in utility compared to others by one slot, a slot that could be filled with grasping earth, shock, bull's strike, protector's strike, disrupting chop, etc. Using 3 skill slots will put you at a real, real disadvantage - you will have to drop attack skills or IAS, speed buff, healing, disrupting. — Skuld 12:28, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

Conjure is usually a bad idea. Readem (talk*contribs) 12:42, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

Typically Friday 13th.. it's nerfday then. —SigmA 15:00, 14 April 2007 (CDT)

Adjust Skill Progression

Skills have a 0...15 attribute level progression while GuildWiki still use 0...12 attribute level progression. Wouldn't it be time soon to start adjusting all skills to 0...15 instead? --Lexxor 04:34, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

I find 0-12 to be more useful for the average user on everything but updates. If you look at the actual templates, you will see we *do* use 0-15 for extrapolating values at attribute levels we have no yet reached. I bet I mispelled that. -- <!--Zerris--> 04:37, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

The Skill Monitor uses 0...12. -- Gordon Ecker 06:21, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

Yes, in-game they use 0...12 so we should use that on wiki. --Heurist 11:17, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

The only reason its 0...15 is because of the way they created their formula for skill progression, for some reason anet also prefer to report it as a 0...15 progression on their game updates. Because this is a direct copy of their game update page, we report it as such. 0...12 progression makes more sense, not only does the skill monitor report it with a 0...12 progression, secondary professions can not go past 12 (not including special event items to boost attribute levels in PvE). -- Xeon 12:16, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

I like 0..12 in that you can't get 13+ as secondary (at least, not just with armor). 0..15 is kind of lame, why not 0..16? I've seen 0..12..16 before, which would be the best way to express a skill, ie. CLEAVE: If this attack hits, you strike for +10...26...31 damage.--CannibalBob 16:42, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

Because ANet uses 0...15 in the update notes and the 0 and 15 values always seem to be whole integers, while the 16 values are often rounded. -- Gordon Ecker 20:12, 15 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah. It's very possible, that the game code is made such, that you enter the 0 and 15 values, and the game makes the rest by itself, just like our progression tables. As such, it's easy for ANet developers to just copy these numbers from the code and would explain it. — Poki#3 , 06:23, 16 April 2007 (CDT)

message of the day

???~Soqed Hozi~

!!! —Aranth 21:00, 16 April 2007 (CDT)

$$$ — Poki#3 , 21:18, 16 April 2007 (CDT)

/%/%/% —Blastedt 11:32, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

My thoughts exactly lol *** ~Soqed Hozi~ 14:09, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

Armors

When does Elonian Armor were added to the game at Consulate Docks ? §: TůζipVõrζąx Talk 03:08, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

It's been there since nightfall was released. --Armond Warblade (talk) 03:11, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah, you probably didn't notice it earlier because it's only available for Paragons and Dervishes. -- Gordon Ecker 03:14, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

That's it! My first Elonian character is an Elem. §: TůζipVõrζąx Talk 03:32, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Messaging

Did you used to be able to click an NPCs name in the chat and send him a whisper? --Armond Warblade (talk) 03:11, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Yes. I remember doing it to Rurik in the early Prophecies missions. --Fyren 03:58, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Lemme guess... Rurik then went to "Do Not Disturb" and rushed a mob of Charr? -- <!--Zerris--> 04:05, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Quest log

Does anyone know when the bullet points in the quest log became double-spaced? -- Gordon Ecker 03:19, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Some days ago, last or before last update. And i hate it ! §: TůζipVõrζąx Talk 03:33, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

There's a comment further up this talk page that mentions it: "Just for the heck of it... they double-spaced quest steps Lostage 22:53, 10 April 2007 (CDT)" — kyrasantae 03:40, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

It's irritating and horrible. -- (gem / talk) 06:18, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Maybe they want us to read between the lines... Foo 07:04, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

ROFL, you've just won a Lyssa's Cookie of Bemusement!!! (-: -PanSola 07:27, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Well, thank you :] Foo 11:01, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Worse thing is that things like new quest aren't showing up in center of screen and near top, but in right-down corner of screen. It's ruining old "climate" of the game, when there was a "whooosh" sound after accepting quest... - (Abedeus) 07:19, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Umm, I think it depends on the location of certain UI pieces. I have the text in the same default position as always. -- (gem / talk) 07:25, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

I still get a whoosh sound, at least when changing from one quest to another. You sure your quest is for the continent you're on? --Armond Warblade (talk) 12:19, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Change of afflicted skills

When going through some lowlevel missions for the master rewards, i noticed the monsters had elites. Image:Afflicted_ranger_using_elite.JPG I also have pictures of other lowlevel monsters using elites. Should it be added to the updates? Jelmewnema 14:56, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Can anyone confirm or deny the presence of low level monsters having elites before this update? If it can be confirmed they didnt't, it should be added to the wiki notes.--Ryudo 19:03, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

Sounds like a bug to me. Bug = mention + wait for fix. I fixed up the above coding, btw. --Armond Warblade (talk) 01:15, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

I do not have screenshot proof, but I am 100% sure Afflicted never used Elites before getting to Level 20 - i.e., not before reaching the Mainland and seeing them in Wajjun Bazaar, Bukdek Byway, The Undercity, etc. I clearly do not remember any Elites on Shing Jea, not on Afflicted anyways...Maybe this is related to Hard mode, which said to tune some normal-mode monsters too? (T/C) 01:32, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

Hardmode was also the first thing that came in my mind. It is probably something that slipped through together with the changed soul explosions.Jelmewnema 01:57, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

Yes, level 10 necromancers using Order of Apostasy in Vizunah Square was a very odd sight. I thought I just missed it every single other time I did it but this makes more sense. It must be new. Ocelot never 07:33, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

Aye, that's probably it. Then again, other low levels use elites in other parts of Guild Wars, maybe they are just trying to make Shing Jea harder? Suppose we will find out whenever hard mode comes out. Level 24 Charr FTW! --Ryudo 04:48, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

I had this quest on my monk and forgot about it until I decided to clear up my Ascalon quest log. Level 24 charr ftl. --Armond Warblade (talk) 02:29, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

I think it was to offset the explosion damage being changed to armor ignoring. - BeXor 05:12, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

I think so too. The afflicted are not really that hard if it weren't for there explosions, so I don't mind the occasional Elite. There attributes are low, so it doesn't really 'hurt'. — Poki#3 , 09:49, 18 April 2007 (CDT)

Explosions = no melee class getting survivor from factions. Explosions are offset by the fact that the quests give 3.5-4k xp each. --Armond Warblade (talk) 02:29, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah this is true, I saw an Afflicted Assasin (under lvl 20) using Shadow Form when I was doing Unwelcome Guest.

Cursor

Not sure if it was the latest update, but my cursor no longer turns red or green when I scroll over creatures in a cutscene. --Armond Warblade (talk) 02:30, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Not the latest one. I noticed that the day before. Perhaps it's been that way even longer. --Ishmaeel .ping( ) ; .peek( ); 03:46, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

I've seen this for as long as I can remember, so I can assure you it wasn't form a recent update. — Ness 16:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Recent as in the past couple of months at least. - BeXor 16:18, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

I've never noticed it either way... the only thing my cursor goes near is the 'Skip' button. If everyone else doesn't skip, I go for a bite/drink/smoke Tain 16:19, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Smoking kills :( — Poki#3 , 17:01, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Who wants to live long and be wrinkly? Tain 17:09, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

*Raises Hand* -- <!--Zerris--> 17:11, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

/agree It's better than the alternative. Besides, when you're dead, I'll be old and wrinkly getting my Vanquisher title on my last character. And you'll only have it on one or two. :P --Armond Warblade (talk) 17:34, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Lol good one. -- BrianG 19:42, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

no, thats tain, tain will have it on 7 of 6 characters... curse you tain. Eronth 19:53, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

within a day or two. :p Tain 20:54, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

really? i over estimated, i figured it would be in just seconds of hard mode's openning Eronth 21:15, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

I meant a day or two after Proph was released. Tain 21:20, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Hard Mode

It said on the guild wars site that hard mode would come out in a matter of hours. Anyone know when exactaly.Kharn 17:24, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Yes, it will be exactly in a matter of hours. -- Peej 17:28, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

NEED HARD MODE *zombie* Maybe I'll be able to get on hard mode tonight... I want that fucking shield. >.> Hard mode farming ftw. --Armond Warblade (talk) 17:37, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Technically, a year is a matter of hours... 8,760 hours. Tain 20:56, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

As is your life. What?–Ichigo724 21:24, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

True :p and mine will be fewer hours than yours, given the discussion above. Tain 21:26, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

It's out, 9:43PM Central time

-Thorton

I just got Master's on Abbadon's Gate in Hard Mode... the icon looks pretty sweet, want me to post a screenshot? Tain 22:55, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Yes, a screenshot would be nice.— Ali (talk) 11:09, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Faction

Not sure if this was a recent update, but... I have UAX, and have had it for a while. It used to say "30,000/30,000" for Balthazar Faction. Now it says "30,000/0" instead. -- <!--Zerris--> 17:31, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Wierd, I have UAX and 16000/16000 faction. -- Gordon Ecker 17:34, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

It's back to 30,000/30,000. Must have been a temporary bug. -- <!--Zerris--> 19:48, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

It's a random bug, I've had it before too. —Blastedt 09:42, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Hard mode update notes

See http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Game_updates:April_2007#Update_-_Thursday_April_19.2C_2007 Danakin 22:08, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

Soloing Killed?

The hard mode update says loot now scales dependign on party size.

That is ambiguous. Either means you get a lot more total loot as a full eight-man party (nice for higher end game areas), or means you get a lot less. I am having trouble finding out exactly what ANet meant by that. I am inclined to believe the former, because that will encourage more teamwork among players and once again discourage farmers. (T/C) 23:13, 19 April 2007 (CDT)

And Anet always said they had nothing against manual farmers... - BeXor 00:19, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Yep, I can confirm. They've officially killed off solo'ing. I just got less drops now, than I did before with the anti-farming thing activated. You already get very little when you're in a party of 8, but now, that's the most you'll ever get. No idea what their problem is. Just making you waste more time to pay for those npcs in your guild hall or getting the 15k armor. Rickyzhou 01:39, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Grrrrr... this ticks me off, though it's slightly less ticking me off since I have hard mode to play with now... but still. Aggrivating. Very, very aggrivating. Of The Wojek 01:50, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah, no kidding. Henchmen won't even trigger the more loot after moving them off the map and greyed out. Since you're not grinding for levels like WoW, you're now grinding for money. To hell with this Rickyzhou 01:55, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

So, basically, no reason to ever solo, 2-man, 5-man, 6-man, again? 66.65.34.242 02:18, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah. Basically it. The only reason to solo would be to absolutely, 100% garantee that IF a desired item drops it 100% DOES drop for you and you alone. :( Thanks for killing the only decent way to earn cash in the game ANet, thanks a lot. *tear* Of The Wojek 02:40, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Yea, ANet has a habbit of sneaking the nerf-bombs in with major updates. While we are all distracted with Hard Mode, the real tyrant is running loose. (Remember October 2006? The AI nerf was snuck in along with the Halloween distraction.) I think ANet seriously wants to lose loyal customers. I know they already lost many of my friends to the AI code previously. And while even though the introduction of Hard Mode may bring them back, the farming nerf will ultimatly make them delete thier accounts. =\ --Curin Derwin 02:44, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

So much for my Derv getting Vabbian armor. *Sigh* I loved farming... --Armond Warblade (talk) 02:52, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Or...you could just bring full 8 man teams into your favorite solo areas and get it done even faster, so that you can do more runs, and get more items. I 110% support this update. This will encourage more team work and more team farming I think. Remember, Guild Wars is supposed to be a co-op game, not "Lets see who can solo farm fastest and get the most ectos." -_- I see nothing bad about this part of the update. --Ryudo 04:16, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

I agree, and the idea that it's impossible to get by without resorting to farming is positively ridiculous, as I never farm and am certainly not hard up for resources. And I give anything decent I find away to boot. -Gildan Bladeborn 04:26, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

I disagree Ryudo. There's nothing faster than killing 30 trolls in one cast of your skill bar. Instead you'll have to split loot, wait around for people to be ready, if you even KNOW enough people to have an 8 man party with - I play with 2 or 3 people. The most real I've ever had in a group playing through any PvE campaign after Prophecies was 5 and that is rare. Now will I be forced to pug and no longer be able to do a couple of farming runs on my own when I'm waiting for my friend to get home from work or school? I remember Anet reps saying on the forums that they didn't care about manual farmers, and that people who have the ingenuity to come up with solo builds should be lauded for their creative thinking. Now we get no reward for this? Forcing people to play a cookie-cutter style is a bad thing for a game like Guild Wars. - BeXor 05:05, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

People who never did any farming, should not write such things. I myself did hardly ever farm, I just started a few runs, for my para needs only the two cheepest parts of fissure armor.. and now, even that seems in the realm of impossibility. It would take a year, to get the missing 18 of 30 ectos... Thanks very much a.net for bringing this one step closer to wow grinding... that's the first time since the first beta weekend, that I hate you for an update. --Ineluki 05:31, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

This is absolitely outrageous, Ryudo, I disagree with you. Just to make Anet suffer, I thought of a way to get money through hard mode while farming. As ineluki said, farming is about doing things quickly. One of the things that dont for in this games quickly are good teams. There are always leavers and noobs. FACT. I have NEVER EVER done a full UW with an 8man group - always 1 leaver or noob spoils everything. FACT. This game is oriented around money, but now money has been slowed down, maybe even stopped. The only decent ways of doing money will be DoA, gems will become the new ectos.This update has discouraged my guild and my alliance. A good thing for GW is to be different from WoW and be better. Well now Anet, you fell to WoW level.I expect that there should be some kind of changement with GW 2. --Batno mercy 08:51, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

"FACT. This game is oriented around money" Wow, I've been playing GW for almost two years, and I never knew! I thought GW was above WoW preciously because GW wasn't money-oriented, because money has no substantial value in GW except to satisfy vanity and compulsive-obsession. And I suspect the reason why you've never done a full UW with an 8-man group is because most of the experienced people who were interested in doing UW went solo or duel-farming. After this update, the amount of 8-man UW groups should slowly increase, which would indirectly increase the overall quality of 8-man groups (as more people will have more experience). Yay! -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 10:08, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

"because money has no substantial value in GW except to satisfy vanity and compulsive-obsession" Thank you for pointing that out, because some people seem to forget this. In WoW, you spend money on new equipment because it's needed, but as there is set, easily-attainable maximums in Guild Wars, you don't need a FoW armor, because one from Droknar's Forge will work just as nicely. I'm totally in favor of this update, because a lot of people I know who are still playing this game are just farming all day and can't be convinced to help with more than one mission or quest per day.

So why have FoW armour in the game? Or 15k armour for that matter. Anet put them in there for vanity reasons. As you mentioned they have no other benefit to say Droks armour, so why are they there? Might aswell get rid of them if we're removing all vanity from the game. 86.134.245.21 11:06, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

They didn't kill vanity, they killed people doing alone what was intended to be for teams, because they don't feel like sharing. You can still have Fissure armor or Torment weapons. Only thing that's changed is the way you earn money, if you're a compulsive farmer. If you actually play the game, you won't notice any difference anyway. That's why the game is called Guild Wars, not Gold Farm. 87.174.252.40 11:41, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Oh no, ectos are going to end up costing 15k apiece!--CannibalBob 11:46, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Ummm, have you ever taken the time to put full runes and insignias on your heroes? For all the heroes it cost me around 70-100k ... now multiply that times my 10 characters. Bullshit the game doesn't rely on money. If options were free like PvP, then you can make that statement... but you definately can't in this case. — RabiesTurtle (contribs) 13:20, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

WoW here I come ... Bezza2k7 09:45, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Its not a terrible idea in theory, but they should have scaled drops up for a full party instead of scaling them down for a small party. The fact that they are so stingy with good drops is the main reason that people solo farmed. Imagine how nice it would be to actually pick up usable drops in many areas of the game, it would certainly add some excitement, satisfaction, and motivation to play more. Instead its the same old thing, "pick up garbage, go to merchant, pick up garbage, go to merchant". No wonder people solo farmed, it was the only way to actually work towards getting something good, unless you "win the lottery" by actually getting a good drop while adventuring with a party. -- BrianG 11:45, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

That's a good idea there Brian, scaling the drops UP would have been an improvement, during the days before the update, even the GOLD drops were usually worthless (and not just from a vanity market standpoint, but from a usability standpoint as well), I'd ID them for Wisdom title and merch or salvage mods. Increasing the numer of usable drops would be a huge step in the right direction) and yes, I know they've increased the grape and gold drops in Hard Mode, but again, it's an area of the game that almost requires a full party to complete. Even so, I'm sure that in a few months, we'll see some ingenuity in how to earn money again, though I do see skyrocketing ecto, shard and DoA gem prices, even in normal green prices as well as the drop rate lowers significantly. Wish I'd done more Nightbringer farming before this update now.... Of The Wojek 12:01, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah exactly. I didn't read about the increased drop rate for hard mode until after I posted, so in a way they did increase the drop rate, but at the same time, you're right that it is going to increase the cost of some items, which is frustrating since I'm already broke, and now to get the most of my drops I have to find more real people to party with instead of using heroes to fill some slots. -- BrianG 12:28, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Well technically you're all right solo farm is just past, there is no point in doing it anymore. It's funny to see that farming build page is almost no longer useful and most of team builds will be unfavoured now. But, lot of discussion pages were already talking about farming nerf, and i knew that soloing would be out of this game someday, because what's the point of a rare item if someone can get full storage and inventory of them in a day, and considering that nerfing skills is not suffisant to stop farming, that was the best thing to do to stop farming. Still i agree with some that will say: oh my god i'm screwed i still need ectos but it will take me a year getting them, but basically this game was created so you couldn't get ectos that easily, now, it was like easier to get a green drop and full obsidian armor than getting grapes and golds... The only question people asks now: what if I have finish all 3 campaigns, i can do nothing now...well here comes hard mode! Paul revere 14:01, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

This could not have come at the worst time. I literly just pick up Factions last night to complet my set (perviously been playing Sins on my wifes account). I strictly farmed so I could buy skills for my toons. So I can tell you what going to come when GW:EN comes out and there are 150 new skills that cost 1000g apiece and there is no way to get the money for them. Also getting the 9000 gold and materials for basic max level armor set is going to be ruff too. The marketplace is going to need a complet revamp, and skill tomes are going to need to be introduced into normal PvE play before this nerf does serious damage. I dont mind the nerf but other things need to be worked on before changes like this happen.--Omega fury 14:47, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

Now there's no reason for a character to stay in Pre-Searing, either, save for the Legendary Defender of Ascalon title. Dye prices are going to hit the roof. I am bobo 14:54, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

You mean, dyes will stop selling to the trader for 10g? Yeah, okay. I think we'll manage. —Aranth 15:47, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

slow interface

Is anyone else getting a slow reaction time with the interface after the hard mode patch? -- Xeon 01:10, 20 April 2007 (CDT)