Remove Commander Rezhang since he is no longer present in the district
Unlocking[]
I had 11 consec in RA, and I unlocked HA.--
El_Nazgir 16:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think it might be because it thinks you had 11 wins in TA, but rather you had 10 in RA, and one in TA. Wild guessing, though. ---
-- (contribs) (talk) 18:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
- No, after 5 wins in RA, you ulock TA (as stated on the article), and when you get to 10 wins, you are put against TA teams. I've already had several 10-win streaks, but no 11. On none of these I unlocked HA, but the one time I had 11 wins, I did unlock it. I've given it some more thought, and I think vipermagi is correct: It only checks your amount of wins, and not where you got those wins, so that if you win a battle in TA after 10 in RA, the game notices "oh, he's got 5 or more consec wins and he's in TA, let's unlock his HA".--
El_Nazgir 17:07, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- No, after 5 wins in RA, you ulock TA (as stated on the article), and when you get to 10 wins, you are put against TA teams. I've already had several 10-win streaks, but no 11. On none of these I unlocked HA, but the one time I had 11 wins, I did unlock it. I've given it some more thought, and I think vipermagi is correct: It only checks your amount of wins, and not where you got those wins, so that if you win a battle in TA after 10 in RA, the game notices "oh, he's got 5 or more consec wins and he's in TA, let's unlock his HA".--
Outpost?[]
Shouldn't this be "Heroes' Ascent (outpost)" with the locbox changed to reflect this detail? It doesn't seem like an "arena" since it has NPCs listed and is a Mission gateway. However, I've never been there, so I'd prefer to hear from someone else on the matter before I edit the article. -- AudreyChandler 04:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- All missions have this duality of a (location) and a (mission) article. There's a huge blob of discussion on S&F/Missions talk that has already made one valued editor give up on the wiki, so beware! ;) --◄mendel► 06:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- ... ... ... I am soooooooo not even touching this subject. Thank you for keying me in to the distinction, though, the oddball classifications make more sense now. -- AudreyChandler 07:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)