Crasher17446@legacy41699648 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Ancient Chaos568@legacy41683910 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
what the heck is wrong with the male chest piece???[[User:71.222.51.77|71.222.51.77]] 06:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC) |
what the heck is wrong with the male chest piece???[[User:71.222.51.77|71.222.51.77]] 06:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
| + | there's nothing wrong with it, i'm happy there's finaly a piece of armor that isn't rediculosly white, definitely getting this for my paragon [[User:Ancient Chaos|Ancient Chaos]] 06:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:53, 7 October 2007
I'm sure a lot of the 'aditional' bits available at the same crafter are cross-class, and shouln't be on this page, though geez 40 new armors (even if mostly reskins) is going to take some time to get the wiki right :) --85.189.5.98 18:44, 3 September 2007 (CDT)
- Well the Choas Gloves certainly aren't for that armor, though the rest of it seems relatively correct ;D
The Imperialist
Not the Bandana71.222.37.117 22:44, 3 September 2007 (CDT)
For some bizaare reason all the "dwarven" armor pieces don't share a set name, and the presence of additional gauntlet types makes it even more confusing. It looks like non-warrior professions might not even have a non-core gauntlet type from that crafter. But then again, Gladiator armor didn't have a helm for ages. -Gildan Bladeborn 14:54, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
what the heck is wrong with the male chest piece???71.222.51.77 06:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC) there's nothing wrong with it, i'm happy there's finaly a piece of armor that isn't rediculosly white, definitely getting this for my paragon Ancient Chaos 06:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)