GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
mNo edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Ah! There they are! I could have sword we had an entry for them but I searched for "rockeater" and "rock-eater." :) --[[User:Karlos|Karlos]] 18:00, 17 Sep 2005 (EST)
 
Ah! There they are! I could have sword we had an entry for them but I searched for "rockeater" and "rock-eater." :) --[[User:Karlos|Karlos]] 18:00, 17 Sep 2005 (EST)
  +
  +
they are easy to kill, but isnt it due to the fact that they use frenzy and not that they have low amour?
  +
  +
:I believe they have poor armor level. Every character I have had pounds them really well. My ele's lightning spell does like double damage against them. I think this is true for all scarabs though, but this is the only one that's a warrior. --[[User:Karlos|Karlos]] 10:05, 18 October 2005 (EST)
  +
  +
::They have an AR of 60 (at least verses fire damage, I didn't test verses other elements or any of the three physicals). I personally think they aren't even warrior primaries. My guess is that they are warrior secondaries, and some sort of caster (necro?) primary. --[[User:Jdram14|Jdram14]] 08:56, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
  +
  +
== stats ==
  +
  +
* AL vs cold,using level 20 and 10-10 wand (10 actual damage) -[[User:PanSola]] (talk to the [[Image:follower of Lyssa.png]]) 01:25, 2 July 2006 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 08:56, 28 December 2009

Ah! There they are! I could have sword we had an entry for them but I searched for "rockeater" and "rock-eater." :) --Karlos 18:00, 17 Sep 2005 (EST)

they are easy to kill, but isnt it due to the fact that they use frenzy and not that they have low amour?

I believe they have poor armor level. Every character I have had pounds them really well. My ele's lightning spell does like double damage against them. I think this is true for all scarabs though, but this is the only one that's a warrior. --Karlos 10:05, 18 October 2005 (EST)
They have an AR of 60 (at least verses fire damage, I didn't test verses other elements or any of the three physicals). I personally think they aren't even warrior primaries. My guess is that they are warrior secondaries, and some sort of caster (necro?) primary. --Jdram14 08:56, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

stats[]

  • AL vs cold,using level 20 and 10-10 wand (10 actual damage) -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa) 01:25, 2 July 2006 (CDT)