GW-Karlos@legacy41688711 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Jdram14@legacy41691378 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ah! There they are! I could have sword we had an entry for them but I searched for "rockeater" and "rock-eater." :) --[[User:Karlos|Karlos]] 18:00, 17 Sep 2005 (EST) |
Ah! There they are! I could have sword we had an entry for them but I searched for "rockeater" and "rock-eater." :) --[[User:Karlos|Karlos]] 18:00, 17 Sep 2005 (EST) |
||
+ | |||
+ | they are easy to kill, but isnt it due to the fact that they use frenzy and not that they have low amour? |
||
+ | |||
+ | :I believe they have poor armor level. Every character I have had pounds them really well. My ele's lightning spell does like double damage against them. I think this is true for all scarabs though, but this is the only one that's a warrior. --[[User:Karlos|Karlos]] 10:05, 18 October 2005 (EST) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ::They have an AR of 60 (at least verses fire damage, I didn't test verses other elements or any of the three physicals). I personally think they aren't even warrior primaries. My guess is that they are warrior secondaries, and some sort of caster (necro?) primary. --[[User:Jdram14|Jdram14]] 08:56, December 28, 2009 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == stats == |
||
+ | |||
+ | * AL vs cold,using level 20 and 10-10 wand (10 actual damage) -[[User:PanSola]] (talk to the [[Image:follower of Lyssa.png]]) 01:25, 2 July 2006 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 08:56, 28 December 2009
Ah! There they are! I could have sword we had an entry for them but I searched for "rockeater" and "rock-eater." :) --Karlos 18:00, 17 Sep 2005 (EST)
they are easy to kill, but isnt it due to the fact that they use frenzy and not that they have low amour?
- I believe they have poor armor level. Every character I have had pounds them really well. My ele's lightning spell does like double damage against them. I think this is true for all scarabs though, but this is the only one that's a warrior. --Karlos 10:05, 18 October 2005 (EST)
- They have an AR of 60 (at least verses fire damage, I didn't test verses other elements or any of the three physicals). I personally think they aren't even warrior primaries. My guess is that they are warrior secondaries, and some sort of caster (necro?) primary. --Jdram14 08:56, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
stats[]
- AL vs cold,using level 20 and 10-10 wand (10 actual damage) -User:PanSola (talk to the ) 01:25, 2 July 2006 (CDT)