From GuildWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I suggest Seeker instead of Seekers. Thoughts? --Karlos 06:27, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

It's the name of a group rather than an individual, hence the plural. Similar to Margonites or Forgotten Ones. --Tetris L 06:32, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Hmmm, this is not concrete on either way, but for Margonites, I stated clearly when I made the article that if there had actually been a single Margonite or if we know their nation's name, that would have been the prefered name. The Seekers are not a race, they are a grouple of people seeking. The name in the game itself is singular Seeker's Passage, not Seekers' Passage. --Karlos 06:51, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
  • We do know single Forgotten Ones, yet we kept the article in plural (despite my request to make it singular).
  • We don't know if Margonites are a race either. They may have been human.
  • The description in Seeker's Passage uses "Seekers" (in plural) like a fixed name for the group.
But ... *sigh* ... lets not start another NEA over a tiny detail like this. If you want to have it in singular, move it. Over and out. --Tetris L 07:34, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Seekers= luxons[edit source]

It has been stated they had a desert presence...-- 20:36, 3 November 2006 (CST)