Icon[]
We should use the underconstruction icon for this -User:PanSola (talk to the 
) 13:12, 8 June 2006 (CDT)
- Or at least not a picture of a Glob of Ectoplasm—an article which is itself not a stub. Which items look particularly stubby? -- Dashface
07:39, 9 June 2006 (CDT)
- I have to say I'm no big fan of the UnderConstruction icon in use at the moment. The text is close to unreadable, the quality is bad and the motive itself is, in my opininon, ill fitting in this context. I would prefer a simple icon (like a crossed hammer and pickaxe) or no icon at all. — Fenris
06:48, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
- It was definitely better than an icon of the ecto though d-: -User:PanSola (talk to the
) 07:30, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
- No question there ;-) — Fenris 07:41, 12 June 2006 (CDT)
- I'm happy enough for there to simply be no icon. I was just trying to replace the ecto as fast as possible without making waves (or waiting for much discussion ;) --JoDiamonds 21:49, 13 June 2006 (CDT)
- No question there ;-) — Fenris
- It was definitely better than an icon of the ecto though d-: -User:PanSola (talk to the
- I have to say I'm no big fan of the UnderConstruction icon in use at the moment. The text is close to unreadable, the quality is bad and the motive itself is, in my opininon, ill fitting in this context. I would prefer a simple icon (like a crossed hammer and pickaxe) or no icon at all. — Fenris
