GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.


Oh Em Gee it bees an archive!

The Archives

Archive #1
Archive #2
Archive #3
Archive #4
Current talk

This space


left blank.

first. Cress Arvein Cress sig.JPG 03:12, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

This is not what GWiki is for. — Scythe 12:55, 4 Dec 2010 (UTC)
Lighten up :) We've been firsting talk pages for a long time now. --Vipermagi 13:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Yes, that is what GuildWiki is for. --◄mendel► 14:09, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
I hate it when internet sarcasm doesn't work >_< — Scythe 14:33, 4 Dec 2010 (UTC)
You need to use the official semi-html tags for that. <sarcams>like this. </sarcasm> --El Nazgir 15:23, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Tried and true method is to add a HTML comment to your post so that you can thumb your nose at people who replied because they should have noticed it in the wikitext. --◄mendel► 16:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Scythe 15:17, 5 Dec 2010 (UTC)
Naz 'just' typo'ed <sarcasm>; they don't actually do anything, so code/nowiki isn't required. --Vipermagi 15:22, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
meh, back when I was using safari it would parce the tags and lock up trying to find the javascript + css that define what they do, so it's always safer to add that 13characters than break a browser (note that that was not the now-current version of safari, I was 12, I now use ff, and the issue has likely been resolved). — Scythe 15:53, 5 Dec 2010 (UTC)
In HTML, that might happen, but MediaWiki sanitizes tags it doesn't recognize, so the <sarcams> actually comes out as &lt;sarcams&gt; . Of course doing it like that explicitly means I can show actual tags in the wikitext without using <nowiki>. --◄mendel► 02:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
To summerise, guys, always use <nowiki><sarcasm></nowiki> or <nowiki></sarcasm></nowiki>. Arnout aka The Emperors Angel 08:01, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
That's the opposite of what I just said. So... do the <sarcasm> tags in your post count or not? --◄mendel► 15:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
I humbly suggest that we all add <whateverthehellwewant></whateverthehellwewant> tags to our posts for the express purpose of crashing Safari. Serves them right for being smug and stuff.Entrea SumataeEntrea [Talk] 16:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
<existentialguilt>But what if, after we crash their browser, they go into a downward spiral of depression and end up committing suicide?</existentialguilt>
*edits CSS*
existentialguilt { display:none !important }
Ah, I feel much better now. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 17:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Ishy is an evil genius, as we speak he is performing a bot run to apply the CSS property "idiot" to the common.css, thus hiding it from RC. He is then going to implement it to every userpage via shell access butrun. Prepare to be owned. I am now undergoing chinese water torture for releasing this information. — Scythe 21:02, 6 Dec 2010 (UTC)