GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.




Second archive! Yay! first post on new page! Yay! spam--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 02:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

You spammer. Put something useful...Ereanorsign.jpgreanor 04:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

What this page really needs is a deep, meaningful discussion. —JediRogue 18:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Well, that's important too :) Let's talk about plastic surgeryEreanorsign.jpgreanor 18:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
And spam --VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Ereanor removed my comment *gasp* For Shame! --VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm not having spam implanted into my breasts, thanks. (damn you edit conflicts!)—JediRogue 18:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, too many edit conflicts here. Anyway, plastic surgery can be a very deep or a very shallow subject. Let's see.

  • Shallow plastic surgery conversation:
    • Dumb Blonde #1: Hi girlfriend, look! I just got my boobs done, what do you think? I'm also getting my nose fixed next week.
    • Dumb Blonde #2: Oh! they look amazing, can I touch them? Wow, they're great, I'd might even consider getting a boob job myself. I hope Dr. Rey from Dr.90210 is available sometime this week. I watch his show every day.
  • Deep plastic surgery conversation:
    • Smart dude #1: You know man, I hate this good-look-obsessed society. So many things in our modern world are influenced by this shallow parameter wich has no real relation with one's abilities and talents.
    • Smart dude #2: I totally agree with you there, my friend. Looks are overrated, there's so many good people out there that will never get a chance at a good life just because they don't look as our society expects.
    • Cool dude passing by: You guys are right. People should learn the lesson from watching "The Devil wears Prada".
Ereanorsign.jpgreanor 20:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Oddly enough, the same basic conversation that's going on on Entropy's page is going on here. Plastic surgery should be a personal thing. There is nothing wrong with a person wanting to change the way they look because it makes them happy. Its doing it because you want to fit what other people want you to be that is the problem. I don't really like my nose. My mother, my paternal aunt, and my cousin have all had nose jobs. However everyone tells me that my nose is just fine. I would have no problem saying, fuck all you, I don't like it and getting it changed except for the fact that I have this thing about pain... So it can go both ways. Its about satisfying you. And society shouldn't get all caught up judging people if they want to get balloon boobs. So much for your smart dudes. —JediRogue 21:04, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't like my looks to influence how I feel about myself much. No matter how many surgeries you get, your look will never last too long, but who you really are will stay with you until you die. If fixing your body is a requirement for your happyness, you'll get either a lot of fixing, or a lot of unhappyness, and I wouldn't want to be that unstable.Ereanorsign.jpgreanor 22:20, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

you were saying about alliances[]

If you want to join our alliance just ask, we fit the description, and if you do just contact me on The Erotic Frog User:Ebil and i will try to get it arranged... Ebil.jpg

We are leaders of an alliance already but thanks. —JediRogue 20:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


Guild Wars 300.jpg lol bored. --Hellbringer siggy.jpg¿ĤëĻĺßŔîÑģЄŗ?Hellbringer siggy.jpg (talk|contribs) 00:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

New Proposal[]

Hey, check out my proposal rough draft and tell me what else I should add or take away from it.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 19:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


Stop adding sections to the catagory books, since its un-needed, and is tagged for deletion. --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 19:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
It's not unecessary, it's actually quite useful. Keep the category IMO.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 20:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
We decided to leave it as it was. Why pick up on an old argument? --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, just adding my opinion on the "old" subject, because I wasn't there when it was happening. Geez.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 20:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Well, on my talk page, it was left hanging, lol. So, see Category talk:Books. —JediRogue 21:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry but im feeling a bit grouchy today >.< --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 21:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Updating Images[]

Fix Mursaat Focus to where I can go and upload a screen for it. --Hellbringer (T/C) 21:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Um?—JediRogue 21:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
How do I make it to where I can upload a screen for the Mursaat Focus? --Hellbringer (T/C) 21:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Upload a pic with exactly thesame name as the current one? --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 21:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
You can always click on an existing image and use the "Upload new version of this file" link. That will replace the image. For new images, use Special:Upload which can be found on the side bar underneath the ad underneath the searchbox. —JediRogue 22:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I can't see an image on Mursaat Focus. Thats why I'm saying to add at least a red link to it on Mursaat Focus so I can upload a screen for it. I've been trying to get all of the other weapon images that had an image replacement tag. --Hellbringer (T/C) 22:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Try ctrl+f5? It shows an image on my computer... --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 22:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Me too. But here's a direct link to the image page: Image:Mursaat_Focus.jpgJediRogue 22:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

(reset indent)Ty I uploaded a new screen for it for giving me the direct link. --Hellbringer (T/C) 22:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC) --EDIT-- I uploaded a new screen shot for it but it didn't appear for some reason. --Hellbringer (T/C) 22:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Hit ctrl+f5. This will refresh the image in your cache. Also, where did you take that screen?—JediRogue 22:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Outside Lions Arch. --Hellbringer (T/C) 22:24, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Uhh I hit ctrl+f5 and it still isn't showing up. Also when I get back on GW I'll upload a newer pic for Charr Spear. --Hellbringer (T/C) 22:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
If you are specifically going to be retaking images that have been flagged for update, try to take them out on the Isle of the Nameless. This is considered "natural lighting." Also, the light blue water is almost always a good background for contrast. It shows up fine for me. It's probably your computer or something. Not sure what is preventing you from seeing it. —JediRogue 22:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hb, you are just utter phail :) --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 22:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
(edit conflict)Kk when I get back on I'll use your suggestion for Isle of the Nameless. Oh and also can you tell me if the Ranger Norn armor dyed male pics are good because if not I could take those over again lol. --Hellbringer (T/C) 22:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
They are a bit contrasting. Red/Black on a very dark background... And the undyed pic's are with the silly /attention shizl. --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 22:32, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
The overview shots are great examples of good armor pics imo. Good quality, the details are very clear and the lighting is just right. Some component shots are missing and the dyable sections are lacking in both size and quality. Make sure that dyed shots are a color that clearly shows what areas are dyable. If you don't like the attention pose, make sure that you shoot from an angle that is very head on. Most characters stand with one shoulder back making it harder to see that side. —JediRogue 22:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Point with the attention stuff is that it doesn't show the "natural" look. I assure you it looks quite diffrent when standing normal. That's why I'd prefer a non-attentioned pic. Just what I think of it :) --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 22:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
/agree with Viper. I personally HATE the attentioned pics, they look little like what they do standing normally. --Shadowcrest 22:39, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I think I like the non attention pose better as well. What is good about the attention pose is that it makes the galleries look nice and neat and uniform. Additionally, it allows the entire armor to be clearly seen. If you look at Warrior Vabbian armor/Female you can see how even though the character is facing forward for the most part, one shoulder is almost entirely hidden. Still, many people have expressed dislike for the attention pose and if you want to go over the images with new ones in a non-attentive pose, that isn't a problem. These new images, however, should be of the same caliber as the old ones. For more info, check out the project page: GuildWiki:Armor galleries project.—JediRogue 22:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I updated Image:Charr Spear.jpg but someone keeps uploading their old picture. --Hellbringer (T/C) 00:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
It looks okay now. If it becomes a problem, there's nothing I could do about it beyond telling the other person to not do it and stuff lol. —JediRogue 00:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

No such cat[]

If it is linked to in many pages (eh, 5 or more I guess) then it is probably better to just create the category rather than removing the links. They are there for a reason :) Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 23:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I found the articles in the Special:Categories page. The categories I was removing were just red categories with only one entry. I just did it for a couple of different categories so I suppose it looked like I was just removing a bunch of stuff from one category?—JediRogue 23:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Ah. I thought you were looking at Special:Wantedcategories. Some of those do deserve to be removed outright, but others need to be created instead. Nevermind :) Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 23:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


I'd vote for you, but i cant acess your RFA =/ --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (T)/(C) (RFA!) 08:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

looks like you found it. Thanks for the support. —JediRogue 09:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Gave up on my RFA. It seems we're 2 admins down atm - i think you and gimme are in for a little bit of a position boost. --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (T)/(C) (RFA!) 09:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


test edit130.245.209.89 21:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

new sig[]

Its all nice and festive :) --Shadowcrest 23:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Mine=blue&white.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 23:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Well tonight is the last night of Hannukah (I did most of my celebrating at home this weekend) so I might as well get ready for Christmas. I'm Jewish but I think being festive and while Christmas has no religious significance to me, I think its a really fun holiday and I love festivity and cheer. —JediRogue 23:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
I=catholic. Yay for christmas!--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 23:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm methodist, but it really doesn't have much religious significance to me either. Generally people are happier around christmas though, and that's a good enough reason for me. --Shadowcrest 23:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Thats a great idea! Holiday sig FTW! Evil Sumatae.pngEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 23:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Don't any of you watch The Boondocks? Christmas is a pagan holiday (and Jesus probably hates you for celebrating it) --Gimmethegepgun 23:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Why is it when I make a sig everyone I see uses the same one =P
I don't particularly mind, its just something to take note of (imo) --Shadowcrest 23:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Omg mate. I just felt like going with the flow as everyone else :D. --Hellbringer loves emo slut druggies (T/C) 23:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Eeh, that color scheme is FTL. Back to normal sig. Entrea Sumatae.pngEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 23:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


Name's Griffin. I talked with you a bit before. I'm an officer in The Fury of the Storms [FTS]. My leader is Odion The Reaper. We'd like the join your alliance...if you'll accept us :). You can contact Odi or me (Ranger of Elibe) for info on the guild. Kk? Cool cool. Bye. --Griffin 03:19, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Hi ^^[]

Hey Im shadow sin, theres another user shadowsin but hes more active than me >.>. Anyways I absolutely agree with Sony being the sux, Mine has vista (I want to shoot it) and is horrible. Anyway, can ya help me set up my user page like you :D Its so awesome with the little tabbies and the stories and the pics its so friggin awesome ^^ Anyway if you can hit me up thanks--Shadow Sin 04:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I'd be happy to help you. Is there something special you had in mind or were you looking for something like mine?—JediRogue 02:51, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


You are now a sysop, Well done! RT | Talk - A joyous wintersday to all 19:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Wow, you're quick. Congrats JediRogue. <LordBiro>/<Talk> 19:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Grats.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 19:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Congrats :) --- VipermagiSig.JPG-- (s)talkpage 19:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
lmfao right when i was struggling to find a polite way of asking when it was going to occur on Biro's talk. ty guys. I promise to not suck. —JediRogue 19:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Promises are one thing...RT | Talk - A joyous wintersday to all 19:11, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Congrats! --Shadowcrest 20:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Congrats! I love you lol. Sorry random comments ftw. --Hellbringer Hellbringer sig.jpg (T/C) 20:41, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Felicitations. Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 03:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Plz ban[]

Look at candidates for banning plx. --Shadowcrest 00:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

I phailed --Shadowcrest 00:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Woulda been faster but its my first real one so I wanted to triple check it. =D —JediRogue 00:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Are you gonna steal borrow Entropy's admin box? --Shadowcrest 00:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Not unlikely. Links like that which are only helpful to me, I'd rather have on my navbar. I'm a recent changes whore tho so I don't think I'll have to look at the cats too often. —JediRogue 00:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


[1] Someone's pretending to be you :O --Wizardboy777 03:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

By Request[]

Well, here's your RC activity!--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 01:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I never thought I'd want spam. I hate spam. But I'm so bored! (Bored being code for, don't want to and can't focus on work). By the way, did I mention that I'm glad your a sysop again because I can use the patrol log to see every page you visit? Makes for much better stalking. —JediRogue 01:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
What?? You can actually stalk what other pages users look at??? AWESOMESAUCE!!!--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 01:11, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
No, just sysops. It can make you paranoid though because sometimes you'll look at a page where someone asked you something and you don't wanna answer right away. But in the back of your mind, you know that they can tell you read what they said and didn't answer. lol —JediRogue 01:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
WHERE IS THIS GOD LINK???--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 01:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
GOD LINK Don't even have to be a sysop. The logs are so incredibly useful. The move log made keeping track of all the vandalism that had to be reverted yesterday much easier. The patrol log is for spying on sysops. The delete log can hide quite a bit of dirt (mostly because sysops can see deleted pages. Not terribly exciting but it amuses me. —JediRogue 01:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
For reverting the move vandalism the contribution logs of the vandal users were more helpful, but the logs do have lots of helpful uses. -- Gem (gem / talk) 02:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Now you know why I have that huge list of links on my user page. As an Admin, I used all of them! --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 02:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
BTW: I thought that the patrol log only showed pages edited by sysops (including reverts), but didn't show what they've viewed without editing. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 02:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
You never really learn the power of Logs and Special pages until you have to use them every day. Just like learning how if you wanna know what is going on, patrol RC. :) Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 03:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Oh I used the logs tons even before I was promoted. The patrol log doesn't work quite as well as a stalking tool as I thought originally because I wasn't a sysop who could see how my movement effected it. When a sysop visits a page, it is automatically marked as patrolled. Each revision to a page gets its own flag. Once a sysop views the page, that revision doesn't get marked as patrolled again. So its not a perfect tool for tracking a sysop's movements, but its still useful. I can see if any other sysops have already viewed a page. If someone else has seen it, I can assume that they saw nothing requiring my attention usually. Not that that will stop me from poking my nose in everywhere. Even in moments of boredom reviewing the contents of deleted pages in the delete log. Or comparing GuildWiki's blocklog with the official one. —JediRogue 04:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

(RI) I think I'm wrong about stuff. I still can't figure out exactly how it marks stuff as patrolled. I will find out. Or someone will call me a nub and point out the obvious. —JediRogue 07:43, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Z0MG G1RR4F35[]

I think your pages look so SCHNAZYY! The pictures look so nice and different with the little clip on them.. so neat, anyways lets hook up again for HA sometime :) Keep up the good work! zomg!!@!@$MKEMED. —MiniHellKite


I can not for the life of me find where this is linked to on the Ranger Elite Luxon armor page. Help plx? --Shadowcrest 01:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

It doesn't link there anymore. Sometimes the usage remarks on the image pages aren't accurate. You can use Special:Whatlinkshere/Image:Gw162.JPG to see what actually links to a page. —JediRogue 01:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Well then, you can delete it now, can't you? Only my talk page links to it, and you'd have to change that, since I'm not supposed to change other people's posts. --Shadowcrest 01:22, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


U R cool again ^^ --- VipermagiSig.JPG-- (s)talkpage 03:21, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Ty for the headsup. As a newly appointed member of the cool people list I promise to wear leather jackets and sunglasses even at night. —JediRogue 03:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Don't forget the indoors, also.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 03:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
I actually do wear my sunglasses indoors and at night. Because I use them as a headband and my head is the safest place to keep them. —JediRogue 04:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


Lol thanks, he was driving me crazy :P --Ricky sig.jpgRicky 15:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

That's what I'm here for. =D. Would have only gotten 3 days but the obnoxious reply on his talk bumped it up. —JediRogue 16:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Well I think 1 week is still not enough! Mercy ftl --Ricky sig.jpgRicky 16:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy. =P Felix Omni Signature.png 16:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
EH? --Feardrake.JPG 16:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Lol I stopped going to the Church a while ago, but I still remember this... Dunno how it is called in english though :P --Ricky sig.jpgRicky 16:32, 29 December 2007 (UTC)