GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.



Archive~6 Oct 2007 ---- Archive~19 Nov 2007

Archived :) --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 17:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

First post![]

YAY FIRST POST --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 29:59, 2 Someember 2007 (UTC)

No --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Actually, according to the time i posted first.. so nyah nyah --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 18:19, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Actually, according to me, you cheat wiki :) --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
=P --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 18:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I can't post, you keep edit confliting me! RT | Talk 18:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Prwnd --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Adding correct link ^^ --Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 22:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Lulz at MP :P --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 15:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Viper, help meh create the humor? i need to make another page for it, and i need to catagorise it.. I'll work on page 2, you set up page one so it looks like page 1 of the category.. We're doing this so its much easier to change. --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 15:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
A few things: I have absolutely no idea of wikicode. I don't see the point in changing how it is as of now. I wouldn't know how it would have to look like. I don't know what I'd need to put on it. As a matter of fact, I have no idea how to name it, if I'll ever start... That's a lot of I's... --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 15:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Well youve been here longer then me, and im already remaking the humor section.. lol. I know a fair bit about wikicode, and we've catagorised it correctly, but we're making the actual humor page so we can change it at will, as well as remove unsavory articles when we want. --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Was I? Hmm... BTW: As I see it now, you're remaking it to have more power in your hands? I quote: "so we can change it at will" and "when we want." --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 16:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Technically, yup. all of humor is in my hands! i own humor! MUHAHAH! --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
And I own ProgR at Q3ADemo, so? :P --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 16:08, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I cant believe i just did 3 and 1 solo.. fingers hurt now, taking a rest. Later. >.< --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Have fun, unlike the past hour or so ;) --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 17:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

FoW/UW Chest[]

If you say they drop everything, does that mean Crystalline Swords, Celestial Blades, Broadswords etc are also included? Methinks it's a smaller selection than say, the HoH chest o.O Jennalee 16:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok, let me rephrase: Nearly everything. Crystallines may not be excluded, the quest reward end chest drop em too. Broadswords? Who knows. Celestials probably not tho... But, I hope you get the point. They drop a LOT of things`--- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 16:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Yea, so do generalised dungeon chests (like, near everything in that campaign). However, they can usually also drop some things like, exclusive or near exclusive to that chest. If the chest is a significant source of something, shouldn't it be mentioned in the location area? Jennalee 17:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, unique drops: yes. Like the Clockwork Scythe, only drops from Oola's Lab. But if it is, say, a Falchion, no. There's nothing in S&F, for as far as I know about this. Perhaps bring it up there? --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 17:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm just saying that if there's not many places which drop it and even if it's not unique to that chest but lots of them are coming from it, it should probably be mentioned in the location anyway Jennalee 01:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


Waarom zit jij niet op TS? en rowan wil kwaaken btw --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 18:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

VET! Ik start ffkes de zolder pc op, ben er over ~7min. Dat is dus ASAP :P *Chargeing mai Railorz*--- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Vang ik nog even spervuur en belofte schot --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 18:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Nov 16th??[]

What happened on the 16th that you got a medal from BigB for?-Kalle Damos

Vandal fighting, I believe.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 19:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Over 75 reverts --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 19:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Against how many vandals? --Gimmethegepgun 19:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
one --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 19:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
No admins were on.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 19:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Okay then.... well.... *steals medal* I didn't get a medal for holding off 3 at once with far more reverts than that! --Gimmethegepgun 19:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
He was on for, like, one and a half hour. He usually made 4 edits a minute. --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 19:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Just made a rough recount: 192... Well, 75 was close ;) --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 19:43, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I feel so lonely =[ no-one wants to talk to me =[ --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 19:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
*stab* Jennalee 01:40, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Ow ya pore thing... spam my talkpage i will talk to u:P--Fighterbitsj 17:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
and gimmethegepgun sure the vandals werent vandalising the others changes?:P--Fighterbitsj 17:56, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
huh? I don't understand bad grammar very well --Gimmethegepgun 18:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
I think he meant "Good sir, did you ever entertain the thought that the vandalizers had been vandalzing one another's vandalizations?" or something like that.-- 18:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)<--- Me, just got logged off for some strange reason.--Gigathrash sig G.jpgigathrashTalk^Cont 18:04, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
lawl, nice interpretation. Anyway, no, they weren't. However, that would make it more annoying, because Undo only works on single edits and so you have to take the longer route for reverting --Gimmethegepgun 18:06, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Odd, had the same thing yesterday. --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 18:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
The hocuspocus BAMF logoff, that is. --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 18:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


But I can't go on guildwars, cuz this computer doesn't have it installed.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 19:28, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

owned --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 19:51, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

u rox[]

Enuff said you and MP47 are teh pwnzr. U guys make me laugh. Feardrake 02:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

YEAHHHHHHAH!--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 02:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
*cheers* --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 09:20, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

that comment was done on my iPhone, so I wasnt to good on my grammar. Feardrake 16:48, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Awesomesausagerbakingmachine, Stole your word, hah --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 17:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
NOEZ! --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 17:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
prwnd.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 18:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


lol u last archived 6 days ago and your page is already this long:P--Fighterbitsj 11:16, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Short* ;) --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 11:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
KASPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!:P--Fighterbitsj 17:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Hah! That's nothing. I archived twice in the same day!--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 17:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
OMGWTFBBQ??--Fighterbitsj 19:03, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
LAWL. Hey, check out my proposal rough draft and tell me what else I should add or take away from it.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 19:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
You forgot to: Give 'em a link to the humor article! :D --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 19:43, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


Three anons already hate me on the official wiki. :P --Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 22:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Cheese.jpg Cheese.jpg Cheese.jpg Cheese.jpg Cheese.jpg Cheese.jpg Cheese.jpg Cheese.jpg
Use this skill bar and WTFPWN em! --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 22:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I think you mean WTFUBERPRWN them.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 22:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Or: "and win PvE" --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 22:23, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Look how many edits on my talk page!--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 22:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok, make that four anons that hate me there. And one of them took a picture of his asshole and posted it on my talk page. How cute.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 22:39, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
That was...lovely. </sarcasm> --Shadowcrest 22:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Oookay.... --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 15:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Lol, cheese. that ownz. Feardrake 21:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)


Dekboi had requested a spam pyramid! Care to help? I don't know when, but sometime soon, probably tomorrow. --Shadowcrest 23:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Viper to the spam crew! Quickly! To the Spam-Mobile! *Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun* Cool music plays.. --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 16:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Cant be arsed --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 16:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I will, fake spam crew ftw! RT | Talk 20:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Spammish Inquisition ftmoarwin! --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 21:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Retard template[]

...I wish there was a retard template we could use without breaking NPA :( Jennalee 12:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm. That wouldn't be a bad addition ;) --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 12:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
The very template would break NPA, that make no sense! RT | Talk 19:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
"we could use without breaking NPA" ^^' --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 19:26, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
My point is you couldn't. No logical sense. RT | Talk 19:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

random comment about ele's sword[]

DOOD I HAS ONE TOO. its on my warrior. it looks slightly phallic at an angle....EDIT: Im talking about the Greater Sage. --Feardrake Sig.jpg Feardrake. 00:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

It does indeed. That's why I now have a Charr Sword. And some other stuff isn't updated either... :D And I'm still missing quite some characters on my page... Better lazy than tired, I supposed. --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 08:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I'ma bored viper. wanna do somthing ingame? --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 10:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I'll log in in about 10 minutes. Then rda is done :P --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 10:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
morning --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 10:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Ohaider ProgR. TS? :P --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 10:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Just shut it down, 'cause no-one was there. hanginthere plox --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 10:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
<isbored> --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 10:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
My computer is doing it's best to fire up GW, okay? :D --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 10:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
BANG!!!! FATALITY!!!! Fucking piece of shit, WORK! --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 10:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I need to add you to In game friends. Lulz. --Feardrake Sig.jpg Feardrake. 15:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Orly? That's news for me --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 15:52, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
:D RT | Talk 15:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
WELCOME TO THE BLACK PARADE!! WE'LL CARRY ON!! The Chag 15:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Eh? --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 15:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
He Iz Spamz0rzingz0rz. --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 15:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Ahaz0rzingz0rz --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 15:55, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
I phail at UW. --Feardrake Sig.jpg Feardrake. 22:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
That may very well be possible. --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 22:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Incomplete spam piramid[]

I thought you were all for finishing them? RT | Talk 07:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

good job on[]

I'm still pretty new around here but i've seen alot of comments about vandalism. today i actually witnessed it and you were on the job :p. i just learned how to make userboxes so i made this for you and all others who fight vandalism =]

Angelic Bond.jpg This userbox is a tribute to all angels who protect this Wiki of vandalism

probably not very original but im proud of it :p Lยкץ๒๏ץ talk 18:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I deserve one! i was the first to revert.. my comp is just slow and viper broke rules anyway! =O he broke GW:1RV!!!11One!.. i reverted a bunch but lagg'd --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 18:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I've done this before, I got rv skeezlz :D --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
BTW, Warw, I'm DLing lots of files. Think I'm going to make it? :P --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Hell-o!!! The Chag 18:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Hell-no? HELL YES!!! And Warwick, tell me whats going on there... NOT IN A WHISPER --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:51, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
We just got a userbox dedicated to us for reverting the noob person, and it looks like the chag has come back to wiki. --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 18:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I also helped! Lol RT | Talk 19:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
I would've ended the vandalism in a second, if it weren't for school. But, then it wouldn't be any fun for you guys!--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 20:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
The box is for all of you :p, i'll get the next n00b that tries this =p Lยкץ๒๏ץ talk 17:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Forgot to put it up ^^' --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 17:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Looks good. also i just noticed your dutch 2 ^^ Lยкץ๒๏ץ talk 17:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Dutch ftw? :) --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
altijd, kaaskoppen 4 life :) lol Lยкץ๒๏ץ talk 18:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Y dont we just make a page to honor all reverters?? then we make a page and an user box and all reverters gett that user box and a place on the page^^--Fighterbitsj 19:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Where would it go?...and in the case of vandals stopping them should be its own reward ;) --Shadowcrest 19:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
user:fighterbitsj/Reverters ? IDK --Fighterbitsj 21:15, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


feedback appreciated. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 20:26, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


Thank god.. somone i Like.. I'ma bored.. --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Mini Spam Pyramid FTW! --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

"somone i Like" Moar pedophiles? :O Nah, jk. Anyways. why are you spam pyramiding my poor, innocent talk page --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 17:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
I show.. I SHOW!!! This is why... --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
It --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Might --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Be --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Because --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Of --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
The --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Fact --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
That --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
I --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Am --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Ext --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Road --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
In --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Ari --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Ly --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Bored --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Or --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Because --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
You --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Are --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Meant --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
To --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Like --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Spam --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
As --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
A --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Member --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Of --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Teh Spam Crew!!!111One! --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam ftw.. i just realised my sig takes about 300kb =/ --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 17:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

/agree, w/e you just said --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:00, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Why does no-one like my pretty RFA? --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 18:42, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Cause you fucked up in coding :D --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


Hi, how ya doing, good? Ok. But really, I need help. I stole your idea for the charracters thing and put it on pvx wiki. Wondering if you could fix it. i havn't finished it yet, and don't delte the stuff at the bottom. I need that for information. But here it is, hope you can help.Charracters. I'm asking you because you were the one that got it to work on your user page.--"Burn Baby Burn!".jpgFireTock 01:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Working on it. A few things: Please don't fuck up on coding and letting me do the honors (I like helping, but I still suck at coding :P ). Hopefully they don't rv. Your para was a bitch to fix up (actually, it ain't fixed yet). Cheers --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 10:19, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Viper when're you gonna vote on my RFA? =[ --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) (My RFA! (vote support) 10:23, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
The Background color "LightBlue" isn't accepted by PvX (dno if 'Wiki accepts it) but that is whats breaking it up. It's red for now. I made it so the "first" background is all over, I thought you wanted it that way. Anyways, it is fixed. And Warw: I won't support, sorry. Just read everything at "Oppose" --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 10:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
lightblue Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 10:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
I know, but i like people to vote even if its a oppose =/ --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) (My RFA! (vote support) 10:28, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, thnx. Guess I'll just go ahead and make the rest of mine.--"Burn Baby Burn!".jpgFireTock 14:58, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Yw, and good luck. --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 15:39, 9 December 2007 (UTC)


Your username reminds me of Diablo 2. Lann-sf2.jpg Lann 19:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I replied to that conversation today :P Read that. Also made a header :P --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 19:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Third attempt ooo. I tried one a forth time but I think I have officially given up on being a necro. I'll leave my Heroes to run necro builds.--Lann-sf2.jpg Lann 19:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Hah, necro not your thing? RT | Talk - The Whacking editor 19:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
No. I stick with physical attackers : /--Lann-sf2.jpg Lann 19:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Nec wins PvE. :D --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 19:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
War wins PvE :DD RT | Talk - The Whacking editor 19:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Correction. I win PvE with AI hero Nec. Lann-sf2.jpg Lann 19:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Dark Masochist or Putrid Veins nuking: No hero build, Yes pwnage build :D --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 20:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


Admit it, that note on Piken Square WAS funny :) --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 21:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

/agree. KILL TEH NPC'S!!!!! --Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 21:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Let's vanquish Kamadan! --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 21:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah! That place needs to die anyway --Shadowcrest 21:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
I'll tank :D --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 21:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Its probably some guy making a mistake. How do you think they would feel if they register and find a bunch of established editors mocking them for it? Lord of all tyria 21:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
We were just having a little fun. Nothing personal. But yeah, it would suck... --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 21:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


Continueing on what we were talking about on TS, here's a linky for ya. Click. Btw, Archive Time Detector is beeping. Hint? --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 22:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

HAHA, omg. That's awesome. Worth it NOT to archive! :D --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 22:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
WTF?XD--Fighterbitsj 13:48, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

your current sig[]

Violates GW:SIGN. It's impossible to read your name. change plix plox. <3—JediRogue 18:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Awwwww.... Back to Taint --- VipermagiSig.JPG -- (s)talkpage 18:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Actually, i can read it fine, and this is on a (REALLY) low def computer. I can see that it says Jedirogue on it.. Oh wait, its meant to say Vipermagi? =P, jk i can see it properly though --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 18:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Its hard to read if you don't know that's his sig. Lord of all tyria 18:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Your new sig is YUCK. Congrats on having no taste whatsoever :D --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 18:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Your new sig is just as hard to read as the first one. Please change.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 20:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Awwwww.... MORE TAINT WORK! --- VipermagiSig.png-- (s)talkpage 20:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Whuddaya people think? --- VipermagiSig.png-- (s)talkpage 20:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Still COMPLETELY unreadable.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 20:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
screw it --- VipermagiSig.JPG-- (s)talkpage 20:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
your sig will always be better then myne just becuz im to lazy to edit it:P--Fighterbitsj 16:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
It's fine. I can read it. Whoever can't can go buy some glasses. And needs to set the monitor a little farther back. "If blind people wear sunglasses, why don't deaf people wear earmuffs?" --Anon Lann-sf2.jpg Lann 22:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
That makes 2 out of a million-and-three. Not gonna cut it --- VipermagiSig.JPG-- (s)talkpage 22:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! No one can see my Sand Castle!--Lann-sf2.jpg Lann 22:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Quoted from GW:SIGN, "In consideration of users with vision problems, be sparing with color. If you must use different colors in your signature, please ensure that the result will be readable by people with color blindness."--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 22:17, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
But his sig is gray-white on black >.>. I don't see the problem. And the quote really had nothing to do with the issue. It was just a funny quote I liked lol. --Lann-sf2.jpg Lann 22:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
I know, but you said that his colorful sig was ok, which it was not.--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 22:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
O I see what happened. I have been making a fool of meself. I came into the conversation at the wrong time. Aye, his christmas color fad change was unmistakenly unreadable. Me apologizes :)--Lann-sf2.jpg Lann 22:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)


Quit stealing my stolen quotes. --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 18:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

But, but, but, it's so true! --- VipermagiSig.JPG-- (s)talkpage 18:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
btw I'm bored. Log onto TS and make my day with some lame jokes or come around and bring me some booze. Your call :) --Progr.jpg -- talkpage 18:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)