Archives
Friday
20
May
23:31 UTC
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55
Rate-a-user. To Vote go here
Favored:
- Yay! I'm the first voter! =D Thoughtful
01:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Whoo RT | Talk 20:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Harr! --//Alcedo Storysparrow\\ 19:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
- How could anyone vote any other way? :) Brankoz 17:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
- prowick :> --Slurry. 17:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Unfavoured:
Delete/Ban:
- For using a show/hide box that doesn't start closed. And the spacing is screwed over on FF. But oh well, it's not my talk page :P Oh, and he has red links in his archives box. Wich, without the red links, is really neat ^^ Banbanbanbanana. EDIT: And Unfavored/Ban didn't show up. /fail. Fixed it as of 27th Feb. 2008 ---
-- (s)talkpage 16:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
#
|
Signature
|
#
|
Signature
|
1
|
You nicked it, damn CC licence. RT | Talk - A joyous wintersday to all 15:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
|
2
|
YAWAI! --- -- (s)talkpage 12:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
|
3
|
Damn you RT.. you moved me out of number1 .. grrrr Isk8 18:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
|
4
|
OWNED -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
|
20-3
|
eh? Bored 20:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
|
69
|
lol'd. -- 12:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
|
7
|
Lolwut? 15:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
|
8π
|
Greek letters make the best numbers! Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 21:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
|
9
|
NOWAI! Isk8 12:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
|
|
with even more love <3 — Nova — (contribs) 21:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
|
11
|
A new sig for a new signingness! — Warw/Wick 18:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
|
42
|
wins. Cress Arvein(Talk) 22:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
|
12
|
'cuz I can — Warw/Wick
|
13
|
|
Pºtªtº
|
Lann 21:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
|
x^0
|
Lewl, i ar numbar wun. --Ruricu (Talk • Contribs) 18:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
|
16
|
Chuck Norris 22:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
|
17
|
|
x/0
|
prwnd everyone --Shadowcrest 21:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
|
19
|
Yay. Thoughtful 23:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
|
28¾
|
20:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
|
?
|
thanks for the welcome. ~the rat~ LegionRat 15:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
|
Ø
|
I win.-- ìğá†ħŕášħ 05:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
|
∞
|
No u-- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
|
13²
|
I was here. And that's all you're getting outta me. Råvŷńǒǔ§Hǔń†ëř :: Talk 02:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
|
1/∞
|
I like this number. Some would call it 0, but they'd be wrong. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 03:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
|
20
|
May, thanks for helping out a newb. Your page is amazing! BrankoZ 15:42 EST, 16 April 2008
|
²
|
Hi :) -- Wammo--STALK MEH 17:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
|
√-1
|
Hola. Sry I dont have a good sig.Relyk 02:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
|
e^π
|
Nice page May. Dragnmn talk cont 11:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
|
1337
|
FireTock 00:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
|
e^iπ
|
I should probably get around to signing your page of pink. Woe to the unprepared eye. Woe. JonTheMon 18:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
|
|
1338 ?
|
Tenetke
|
Just wanted to tell you thanks for all the kind words. Really appreciate everything and I hope I can help with wiki out more.
|
For the the template, see:
User:Warwick/TopEnd/Talk
For the link to my TopEnd, go to:
User:Warwick/TopEnd/Talk
Hai[]
I've said that a lot at the top of my archives. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Archive much? Lord Belar 22:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above sentence is not a question. A proper question would be "Do you Archive much?", this public service announcement is brought to you by RT 22:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above comment has been brought to you by a Grammar nazi.
Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 23:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Gramrar iz 4 phailures amirite? Lord of all tyria 23:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yu am write.
Entrea Sumatae [Talk] 23:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Are he is evar rong? Thoughtful
23:52, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yas ---
-- (s)talkpage 10:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
My Juggie![]
FTW =D
-- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 19:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Ta-da.--Gigathrash 19:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Woop! =D --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 19:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Yo[]
You should probably redirect Lunar Blessing and Lucky Aura too while you are at it. I'd have done it myself, but you already started, and I should be asleep -_- -- Sk8 (T)(C) 21:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Done. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Night All.[]
Night everyone. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Good night, Warw --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.)
- Night warw --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Night warw --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Night warw --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Night warw --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Night warw --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Night warw --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Night warw --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Night warw --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Night warw --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sad RT 22:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
so anyways[]
As we all know Warwick was all like "rawr" at me for killing him in mafia. Then, today, I'm trying to help a friend (that he doesn't know) cap SoJ in mineral springs. Not content to just bring a friend of his who can only 55, he also brings Defend Droknar's Forge! Epic lulz. --Shadowcrest 22:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yay! --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 13:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
TDS[]
I'm in your guild now, by the looks of it. Elbereth Plingggggg. -- Brains12 \ Talk 14:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- if so, welcome! RT 14:56, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- I agree.
---Jamster--- 14:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Jam is an ally, I think MP47 is in the guild as well (according to Warwick) RT 15:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Nice, what are your character names? -- Brains12 \ Talk 15:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm "Omg Bananas" RT 15:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think you are. Jamster is in the guild. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
gw[]
at once kthx --Shadowcrest 16:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- And Gmail too, kthx RT 16:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- You both wanna keel me? --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Mafia[]
Have you received your role for User:Randomtime/Mafia/2 ? RT 06:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Spree[]
The only reason I had a deletion spree is because as of that day I could, and Ezekiel replaced a bunch of armor images ;) That aside, yes, I play lots of other games. But I can tab a lot more whilst playing Diablo II than when I play GW, tbh. --- -- (s)talkpage 15:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, yeah I suppose. I dont really know what diabolo is, I thought it was a client game.. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Google.com... Really Warw, try it sometime. --
15:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's the best sold RPG ;) Wikipedia:Diablo II. Rated 16+ cause it's "rather" bloody. It's like all games from that time: good old CDs. ---
-- (s)talkpage 15:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Heh, back when it was out I probably have more of a life then I do now ;) --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- You were probably a toddler, tbh.
15:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- When was it released? --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- I dunno.
15:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- June 2000 ---
-- (s)talkpage 15:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Then I wasn't a toddler; I'm 16.. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- In body or mind? --
15:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Both. Well to be truthful, I think I get my brothers mind age, to tbh 32.. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Paragon Bosses[]
Can you check to see if they actually do drop a green first? --Macros 15:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- I was right on all of the other ones, I new that it didnt drop one, but Idk why I did it.. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- On a side note, can you give me the categories for all the professions you've already done? --Macros 15:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Derv, RT did monk (I think, check please), Ele, some warrior, some mesmer. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Fuck, I named the others "green items".. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- There, all the categories are made, for your convenience. --Macros 16:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. And here I was thinking you were going to offer to help me! Ah well, so much for courtesy for the ladies =P. One-Person-Crusade? --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- I shall help. Which would you like me to do?
16:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, thank you felix! *Glares at macros* If possible, could you start on the Assassin one? Then, after move onto Rit? --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, but I'll have to do it between alliance battles. Grenz, so I can't leech.
16:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- You'd think of leeching if we weren't at grenz!?! =O, Shame on you Felix! --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- No, but I would occasionally take short breaks from the action for wiki work.
16:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Aha. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Ritualists done :) ---Jamster--- 16:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Would you start on mesmer then? =] --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Don't forget non-boss foes that drop uniques.
16:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, thingy fan, right?
---Jamster--- 16:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
(Reset indent) Smothering Tendrils too. Assassins done btw, what's left? 16:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Rangers maybe? --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:56, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- V. well then! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Felix Omni (contribs) 16:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC).
- I think I might actually play GW now xP. Done my little bit. Shout if you really need me.
---Jamster--- 16:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Could we get uniformity on the category names? Some of them are unique, some are green.
17:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- I started off calling it green, now they're unique, and NO I am NOT changing them. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 17:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- ...D:
17:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- They are called Uniques rather than Greens, oficially. So, happy editing :P ---
-- (s)talkpage 17:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Go away viper >.< --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 17:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Before you add "Drops Monk Green Item" to a bunch of pages, you really should change the category. It's just going to mean more work later if you don't.
17:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- RT already did about 50%.. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 17:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- So fix his error and hold it over him later.
17:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- And do 100 monk bosses? Nty. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 17:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
(Reset indent) Someone will have to eventually. Go ahead, be a hero. 17:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- No they won't have to. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 17:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Brother, you[]
Which warwick are you, and which one started all those RFAs? RT 21:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Can I spam and vandalise and then blame it on my fictious sibling? plzzz. Not saying you're lying, but it seems so ludicrous :p
---Jamster--- 21:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- This is getting out of hand, Warwick.
(T/C) 08:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Pardon? I'm not sure what you're talking about. The previous RfA's have been scattered over the last 6 months. And the one at the moment is my first one. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:42, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Btw- Its may. Warw left the wiki. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- The administritive view on this is that 1 editor = 1 account, otherwise it confuses things for everyone, and gives scapegoats for things that happen RT 18:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Regardless if my brother existed or not, I have no negative contributions to the wiki. Check my contribs, honestly. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 18:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
A quick word: We keep those stories on the Heroes of Cantha (#Kitah) page. Should we slap all the texts on the other heroes, or keep the Kitah page without that pedestal story thingy? --- -- (s)talkpage 16:05, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well I suppose I could do that. I'll be right back then. Then, back onto my crusade. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- I vote for putting them on their own pages, and solely keeping the first paragraph added with a catagory link. --
16:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well, if you want to do it, sure. Less work for me ;) ---
-- (s)talkpage 16:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- I supposed I'm bored enough. :P --
16:10, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Bad Org! MINE! --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- You hold no power over ME! Muhahaha. --
18:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Userpage update[]
Can we expect an update to your userpage sometime soon? Seeing as it's just one Warwick now...
- For one. Navbar at the top allows you to "email him", although you're a full-time female as far as I know now. :D
- Your Minor Edit Button is glued to the ground, yet you forget to set your edits as minor and make far too many minor edits.
- You live on Marcopolo's userpage. Even though you live on Entropy's userpage.
- Few more instances of he > she.
- Pulverizing Smash is a good combo with any KD skill that's not Hammer Bash or Heavy Blow. Or Grapple, unless you've got an anti-KD on yourself.
- Has this user still turned evil?
- Do you and your brother share a GW account as well? I have no idea who I'm talking with when I spot Warwick online. :D
- I've run out of information, but not bullets.
...And I think that about sums it all up. I read most of the userboxes, at least. Skimmed a few. -- Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 18:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm going to TOTALLY change the layout of the page. When I can be bothered. Which is now. I'll answer the questions in a min. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 18:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- It would be wonderful if you reduced it to a more reasonable size... maybe under omg shut up
18:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Am I the only one that never knew there were "supposedly" 3 Warwicks. It urks me just a little. And it seems rather suspicious too--
Sk8 (T)(C) 18:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- 3? --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 18:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- They're multiplying! --
18:17, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- The word is "irk." Urk is the noise you make when you're strangled from behind.
18:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ive been hearing sister and brother. Or were the brother comments when talking to the sister... you know whatever.. this is way to damn confusing and frustrating for me. Sock puppetry to a whole new level anyone? Bite me Felix --
Sk8 (T)(C) 18:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Tbh, its got nothing to do w/ sockpuppetry.. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 18:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- (EC x3) Apparently, Isk8 is also the only one to know there's three... even Warwick doesn't know there's a triplet out there somewhere. (I think it's actually Isk8.)
- ...and yes, you would probably say "urk" if Felix bit you. --
Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 18:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Tbh, he wouldn't survive long enough. I have mighty mandibles and superior jaw strength.
18:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- This is the most talk my page has seen for.. ages O_o.. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 18:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. --
Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 18:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- And by My, who are we referring to -_-
- No Felix don't use those Twisting Jaws on me AHHH!!! --
Sk8 (T)(C) 18:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Male Warwick is indefinitely AFK from what I know, so we're talking about May's talk page. --
Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 18:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- "AFK"? More like locked from the account.. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 18:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's not as easily abbreviated. I sacrifice correctness in favor of simpleness. --
Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 18:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- LfA? --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 18:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- That makes me think of laughing. Laffing, to be more precise. (I tend to pronounce abbreviations just like words.) --
Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 18:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
I have to say[]
Sorta-lol:
- (diff) (hist) . . m GuildWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Warwick(3); 20:53 . . (+253) . . Warwick (Talk | contribs)
- (diff) (hist) . . m GuildWiki talk:Requests for adminship/Warwick(3); 20:52 . . (+235) . . Vipermagi (Talk | contribs)
- Really now, you're easily amused. --
20:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Night all[]
Goodnight, all. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 21:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Same. --
-- talkpage 21:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ehh, it's 4:30 where I am. Not nearly time to go to bed :P--
(Talk) (Contr.) 21:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- I suppose it has no real use for me to respond here? ---
-- (s)talkpage 21:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- You would be correct in that statement.--
(Talk) (Contr.) 21:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- No, we leave spam for Warwick to return to :P --
Sk8 (T)(C) 21:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's cruel RT 21:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- What's cruel is what tock did to giga --Shadowcrest 21:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Leave as in: Shove it down her throat? :P --
21:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed!
21:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Leave what? --
Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 21:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Spam. Text. Pixels. ---
-- (s)talkpage 21:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- Marks of Aidan.
21:48, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
- (EC) My screen holds 983040 pixels. --
Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 21:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
May[]
If you would prefer to be called by this name now, then I would suggest making a new account and redirecting all Warwick-related items to it. This would also help dispel the confusion about "what is Warwick?" (T/C) 02:33, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ask not "What is Warwick?" but ask "What is it, that is Warwick?"
02:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Then again, entropy, you could just rename me (I think that you can), also, neither of us were actually called Warwick; Its just because we live there. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 07:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Someone's up early.
07:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Woke up at 6:30, couldn't get to sleep >.< --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 07:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Woke up at 6:00, to go on wiki! (nerdness) RT 07:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- =X --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 07:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry... RT 07:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- QQ moar
07:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Anyway, I'm going to go think of some reasons that progger should go vote for me.. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 07:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
(Reset indent) It's not an election... the choice is really Entropy's. 07:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- It gives me somthing to do for the next hour~ --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 07:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Loi RT 07:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well, its nearly 8... Guess I'd better start getting ready. Laters all. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 07:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
New Sig Test[]
With the adding of Special:Editcount and my recent edit to GW:SIGN, I now have a EC in my name =D. No, not an edit conflict- close! An Edit Count! -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) (EditCount 08:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- It's too long now. And I don't think you're allowed to modify policies to suit your needs.
08:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Felix is right on both counts. Its better to discuss things before putting them into action. —♥Jedi♥Rogue♥ 08:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm, I suppose. It just seemed a little obvious, and I was surprised it hasn't already been added. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) (EditCount) 08:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Afk[]
Temporarily afk. I have a load of stuff to do. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Unique drops[]
Let's hope we didn't miss anything. -- 20:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- /hope. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 20:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
G'night all[]
G'night. I probably wont be back on, so dont hold out much hope. =P. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 21:07, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- U going to die tnight? 0_o --
Wammo--STALK MEH 21:14, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's cryptic RT 21:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- I meant I wont be back till now..... Bah... --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Knoife[]
Got it. Zulu Inuoe 16:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh sweet. How much are you looking for for it? --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 16:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Another Tuna sandwhich like the one I had that night, many weeks ago... Zulu Inuoe 16:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Your RFA[]
I would give you my support if YOU can give me good reasons to my question: Why do you think you should be an admin? -- 21:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- The reasons I think that I should be an admin:
- I patrol and (would) ban vandals a lot; and now can do it during school hours (I now have a laptop for school =D)
- I've made a lot of positive contributions, and I'm on the 'wiki most of the time
- There have been no negative contributions on my account, so I dont need a fresh start
Those are my reasons; Think them over before you decide. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, reasons 2 and 3 stand. But my last question is: How severe do you think the vandal problem is at the moment? Because I think it's rather small. --
22:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- It may seem small, but thats because they're usually banned. Or they get bored. We had 3 vandal attacks today, and they got bored pretty fast =P. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's EXACTLY why I think we don't need another admin. If we needed one, I think you'd make a fine choice. --
22:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, but new users also make wrong articles in mainspace. Those need deleting, which is, I suppose, another reason sort of. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- (ec) The wiki might not be in immediate need at the moment, but how does an extra admin hurt (especially if you agree that Warwick would make a good admin)? There's no point keeping the admin pool as limited as possible - it wasn't that long ago when there were only two active admins, who knows when that might happen again. In my opinion, the number of admins should have absolutely no bearing on whether you support or oppose. -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:19, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh and brains; sorry for the gww jibe; us at gwiki like to pretend we hate gww =P. Arn't you going to vote, Br? =P --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Np, I'm used to it ;). I'm not active enough here to put a "vote" forward, Warwick, sorry :P -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hey nub! Stop breaking GW:YAV! =P --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- But but I'm not valuable! -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Omg!!!!!! Be right back... --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:32, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- You ARE Valuable, Brains! As long as you vote for me, that is! =P --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ah noes, I'm being banned! (irony is that if you were admin, you could just ban me outright..) -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Lol, try actually reading the notice =P. --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- GW:No Manipulation :P. Meh, I'm changing my vote anyway. Had to reboot. Also: Stop! Archive time. --
22:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- I know, I responded to your joke with a (not-so-obvious-by-the-looks-of-it) joke. Oppose:. Doesn't get humour. ;) -- Brains12 \ Talk 22:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Aw. =P. Anyway, aw, but my talk was starting to look so prett-- (Archive) --
Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
|