GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
Advertisement
Warwick

GuildWarsWiki ▲ GuildWiki ▲ PvXWiki
Please leave new messages at the bottom of this page.




# Signature # Signature
1 You nicked it, damn CC licence. RT | Talk - A joyous wintersday to all 15:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2 YAWAI! --- VipermagiSig.JPG-- (s)talkpage 12:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
3 Damn you RT.. you moved me out of number1 .. grrrr Isk8.pngIsk8 18:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 4 OWNED --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
20-3 eh? Bored 20:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
69 lol'd. --Feardrake.JPG 12:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
7 Lolwut? 15:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Greek letters make the best numbers!Entrea SumataeEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 21:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
9 NOWAI! Isk8.pngIsk8 12:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC) with even more love <3 — Nova Neo-NovaSmall.jpg(contribs) 21:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
11 A new sig for a new signingness! —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 18:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
42 wins. Cress Arvein(Talk) 22:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 12 'cuz I can —MaySig.png Warw/Wick
13 Pºtªtº Lann-sf2.jpg Lann 21:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
x^0 Lewl, i ar numbar wun. --Ruricu Shield of Deflection is purty! (TalkContribs) 18:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 16 Chuck Norris 22:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
17 x/0 prwnd everyone --Shadowcrest 21:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
19 Yay. Thoughtful Thoughtful Sig.png 23:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
28¾ Felix Omni Signature.png 20:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC) ? thanks for the welcome. ~the rat~ LegionRat 15:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Ø I win.--Gigathrash sig G.jpgìğá†ħŕášħ 05:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC) No u--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 23:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
13² I was here. And that's all you're getting outta me. Råvŷńǒǔ§Hǔń†ëř :: Talk 02:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 1/∞ I like this number. Some would call it 0, but they'd be wrong. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 03:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
20 May, thanks for helping out a newb. Your page is amazing! BrankoZ 15:42 EST, 16 April 2008 ² Hi :) --Fighterbitsjsig.jpg Wammo--STALK MEH 17:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
√-1 Hola. Sry I dont have a good sig.Relyk 02:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC) e^π Nice page May. Dragnmn talk cont 11:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
1337 "Burn Baby Burn!".jpgFireTock 00:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC) e^iπ I should probably get around to signing your page of pink. Woe to the unprepared eye. Woe. JonTheMon 18:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
1338 ? Tenetke Just wanted to tell you thanks for all the kind words. Really appreciate everything and I hope I can help with wiki out more.


For the the template, see:

User:Warwick/TopEnd/Talk

For the link to my TopEnd, go to: User:Warwick/TopEnd/Talk

Archived[]

Fresh, clean and unfouled.. Till felix comes along. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 07:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Stealing maui's archive 2, cause I can[]

Femwick, what the fuck. This is too much. You can post great gobs of code that don't matter to boost your character count, but don't go stealing other people's conversations! Do you have any idea how rude and inappropriate that is? You weren't even PART of them! Felix Omni Signature.png 07:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Causing lag as well when you SUBST: such a big page, so please don't do that. --GEO-logo.png Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 07:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Eh, I was bored. And IDK what I was smoking. ^_^ —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

ToC[]

Can you please keep a ToC on your page? Since you force everyone to stare at your obtrusive color scheme that you refuse to change despite multiple requests to do so, at least let them skip to the section they want. --Shadowcrest 16:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Nope. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 16:56, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
And why not? --Shadowcrest 16:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Because its white on a pink talkpage, which looks baed imo. and I dont want it anyway. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 20:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Why[]

Are you ignoring me? --Progr.png -- talkpage 18:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Lolol, fail. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 18:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Attuned Was Songkai[]

I must ask you to not re-revert edits as according to GW:1RV. I feel that by now you should understand how it works. Anyway, please don't make this error again, alright? --OrgXSignature.jpg 20:06, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

See birchwoodas talkpage for my response. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 20:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I saw that after I wrote this, anyway, you should probably read the comments before reverting. --OrgXSignature.jpg 20:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm doing like, 4 things at once, so its hard to pay attention to all of them. Wasn't really paying attention just then. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 20:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Goodnight, everyone[]

And good night to all of you too. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 20:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

okay, 5 mins later, goodnight for real. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 20:48, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

:P[]

Un-Dumped--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 00:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Yay for you. Congrats, Marco! Now to see what the coding that I copied from pan did, since my toolbar is on the right.. =| —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Check the date... --OrgXSignature.jpg 14:31, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I know. So what? —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
It's april fools. Waste of time trying to fix it. --OrgXSignature.jpg 14:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Doubt it's in your .js, since at least I and OrgYX have it, think its for everyone. --- VipermagiSig.JPG-- (s)talkpage 14:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Its on all pages.. :< —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Is this an april fool's joke? :P Lord Belar 01:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Sidebar Issue (moved)[]

moved from User talk:Vipermagi
What is this sidebar issue thing? --Shadowcrest 17:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Pan did a little vandalism. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 17:10, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Ugh, quit it Warw, you know it was a joke and it wasn't that bad. --OrgXSignature.jpg 17:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
THATS TROLLING! Nah, I still consider it vandalism. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 17:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes, you consider it vandalism. However, in your last post you stated it as a fact. Also, you could consider it a style change. --OrgXSignature.jpg 17:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
What did it do? Move the bar from the left to the right? --Shadowcrest 17:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
On talkpages, yes. --OrgXSignature.jpg 17:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
No, Org; I stated it as my opinion on the matter. I know that it was intended as a joke, and have not called for a ban to Pan. Which I would have done, if I hadn't known that Pan was having a joke. I still dislike it and consider it vandalism. And I'm annoyed with it because it totally broke GuildWiki for my browser. And yes, shadow, thats what it did. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 17:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Pan did a little vandalism. Stated as FACT! --OrgXSignature.jpg 17:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
No, thats my opinion of it. I never said that it was my opinion, but nor did I say that it was a fact. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 17:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
When will you learn to take responsibility for your errors? --OrgXSignature.jpg 17:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I have a great many answers to that, including stuff about the fact that you saying that is quite hypocritical, but I'll settle with "When will you learn to take responsibility to yours". —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 17:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I know that I fail. That's not the issue here. --OrgXSignature.jpg 17:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Why do you bring a matter that is totally uninvolved here? I said nothing about you failing. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 17:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
"When will you learn to take responsibility to yours" Um... You're pointing fingers, and still claim that Pan did a little vandalism. isn't stated as an absolute fact? --OrgXSignature.jpg 17:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
You change topics very rapidly, and still havn't answered my previous question. I retaliated to you saying that, and now you're saying I'm "Pointing Fingers"? I call what Pan did vandalism, and I'm sure a lot of other people do not. But he called my showing Marco and Entropy aout some vandalism I found vandalism itself. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 17:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Allow me to rephrase. With "When will you learn to take responsibility to yours" Um... You're pointing fingers I mean that you don't debunk your irresponsibility but claim that I'm the problem. While this might be true it doesn't make you more responsible. Also, and still claim that Pan did a little vandalism. isn't stated as an absolute fact? means that your sentence solely implies that it's a fact. --OrgXSignature.jpg 17:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I dont understand what you're saying. I think you may have misunderstood somthing. I'm saying that I consider it a little vandalism. If what you read doesnt convey that to you, Eh. Its what I intended. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 18:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to the internet, where the way you form your sentence means everything. In other words, there was only one obvious interpretation. --OrgXSignature.jpg 18:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
You dont have to be so rude in conveying it. Or didn't you intend that to sound rude? As you just said, "The way you form your sentence means everything". —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 18:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
The way you form a sentence is only half of the result; it's also in how it's read. Emotions, etc, rarely convey well in text form; so how you take it can vary a lot. Warwick was meaning it as an opinion as she wrote it, and short of explicitly stating "this is only an opinion", there's not much else to do there. Trying to blame every misread/mistyped comment on each other does no good to anyone, so might I suggest either agreeing to disagree, or simply dropping the subject? --GEO-logo.png Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 18:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not even sure why he's continuing on at me about it =| —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 18:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Ever heard the term "it takes two to tango"? --GEO-logo.png Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 18:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Uhu, but as I discussed with you yesterday, jio, when I have the oppertunity, in my nature I just have to answer back. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 18:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Which is why I interjected. --GEO-logo.png Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 18:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

(RI) I'm glad you haven't discovered that that idea was actually mine...--Gigathrash sig G.jpgìğá†ħŕášħTalk 02:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Ah well[]

Goodnight, everyone. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 20:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

bye Felix Omni Signature.png 20:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Real goodnight, now. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 20:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Help Please[]

On My Character Page My Chars i have the pic of my ranger how can i add a piece of code below the picture i have the code i just dont know how to plave it below the pic :P --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 23:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

What part do you want below the pic? All, or just show/hide boxes?Entrea SumataeEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 23:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I want to add 3 more Show/Hide Boxes Below the picture so it gives the infomation about it =]... do you get me? --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 23:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
OK, the boxes you want arent there yet. I'll try and get them for you.Entrea SumataeEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 23:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
i have the code :P just need to know how to add them to below th pic :P xD --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 23:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I fixed you page, just add your boxes instead of the blank showhide I put in.Entrea SumataeEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 23:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank You Very Much... Is there anyway to shrink the width of the box down so its not so far across? --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 23:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Where did this discussion come up the other day entrea? :P --Shadowcrest 23:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Entropy's page.Entrea SumataeEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 02:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Specificly, here.Entrea SumataeEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 03:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

G-G-G-Girl![]

Never saw that coming =P I'd sign your guest book but it's confusing and hurts my head!--DNA 23:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

no u[]

You clearly haven't been paying attention, since I have stated on my talkpage that I had no part in the crappy April Fool's "joke" and I don't approve of it. Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 06:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Man, Entropy's sig looks downright sickly on this page. Felix Omni Signature.png 07:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, if I had a neon pink pair then it would be invisible instead. I'm not sure if that would be better or worse. Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 07:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Pair? >.> Felix Omni Signature.png 07:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
My sig is a real-life image; if you had read a little bit about me you would know that I'm very fond of Converse. I wear a pink pair with "Entropy" monogrammed on the sides. (I've used the name for other stuff before I had an account here.) So that's where my sig image is from. However, the pink of my shoes is one level of pink, while May's talkpage background is a much more intense, "neon" pink. So, they don't match. Thus me saying, if I had a neon pink pair, it would be invisible. Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 07:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I have read a little bit about you, but that doesn't mean I'd automatically associate your signature with your shoes. I understand now, though. Felix Omni Signature.png 07:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Now that I think about it, you're right, it is not that obvious. Ah well. Note for May: although I was going to simply write you off as overblown and pretentious (even after reading your apologies) I changed my mind and I think you're at least partially right about the April Fools CSS jokes. It is taking things a bit far and unfairly forces the minority (those who don't like it) to put up with a joke so everyone else can laugh. That's not very Wiki-like. Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 07:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikia disgusts me[]

If they dont fix all of this coding, and remove these fucking sucky ads which screw with the viewing on AOL, I'm leaving GuildWiki. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Okay, wtf? When I was logged out, it has this new really sucky look, but now its normal again?? Wtf?? —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Exactly what I was thinking, brah. Zulu Inuoe 14:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Showhide boxes are god damn not working for Crapia, and trying to log in on my wiki computer just froze it. Tyvm, Wikia. Oh, and theres a huge white space at the top of my page, for some retarded reason which I will fix. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
RAGE :@ its just so slow and laggy and :@ lol xD h8ing it so much --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 14:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I am seriously pissed off with this. Wikia should GTFO and we should all go kill Gravewit for being an asshole and selling it to these people who can't handle "Basic" coding.. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Why don't you host your own wiki? --OrgXSignature.jpg 14:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I do, but I don't host it because I dont want to. I use my wiki for testing coding out. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Hopefully they're still just working with it. -,-' Or else I might consider official wiki. J Striker 14:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Yet, you seem to fall into childish insults concerning Gravewit. --OrgXSignature.jpg 14:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Everything has been working for me since my last post. And hey Org, you just mentioned something completely out of topic as an aim to aggrivate somebody, that's mean Zulu Inuoe 14:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
(edit conflict) I'm already considering the offical wiki. At least the offical wiki doesnt have crappy ads screwing with the spacing, at least the offical wiki doesnt take about 3 mins to load my monobook.js preferences.. And OrgX, what the fuck? Mind your own buisness? I've always loathed Gravewit for selling us to Wikia, and as far as I'm concerned he sold our efforts. Seriously, its you thats being childish- Stop trying to find fault in everything I do. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
To why is wikia an improvemnet then? --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 14:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
(edit conflict) I am seriously pissed off with this. Wikia should GTFO and we should all go kill Gravewit for being an asshole and selling it to these people who can't handle "Basic" coding.. Out of topic? I believe this can be considered NPA material. --OrgXSignature.jpg 14:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
(edit conflict) So whats going on? Just logged in to see this crappy superwhite background. -- Isk8.png Sk8 (T/C) 14:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Wikia isnt an improvment. We managed better on our own. I still like wikia, they just need to make sure everythings working properly before moving. And yay, the showhide boxes are working again. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
My whole userpage is extremely jacked up. -- Isk8.png Sk8 (T/C) 14:40, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Org, you're annoying. Zulu Inuoe 14:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Not to mention the favicon sucks. (GWW, meanwhile, is great!) -- Brains12 \ Talk 14:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Brains, I may be joining you over on GWW. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Warwick i was tlking to Orgx as he seemed to be defending it --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 14:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Not really, I was just pointing out that her language was inappropiate. --OrgXSignature.jpg 14:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Truthfully, Org, Why are you trying to find a fault in everything I say? The wikia coding of it is pretty fail at the moment. And I'm pretty annoyed with it. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
The coding is Epic Phail... i started to do my page only yday lol and it was all sortted and now is F***ed up --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 14:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
If you want you can steal the layout from My page. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Truthfully, Org, Why are you trying to find a fault in everything I say? 1. NPA is pretty serious. 2. Whenever you err you often react by claiming you didn't err. (Positive edits discussion come to mind.) --OrgXSignature.jpg 14:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Thief Lol :P --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 14:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Or it would be serious, if a) i meant it, b) i knew were gravewit lived c) most people, sadly, agree with me. And org, I stick by what I said, I have made no negative edits. You're misinturpreting my words purposely to make it sound like I'm doing some great wrong. That or you greatly lack a grasp on the English Language. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I hope they get this all fixed up soon. My page is uber broken right now, show hide not working, as well as half my code throughout the page. As far as NPA, I think the user has to actually be around in order for it to qualify. No body gives a rats ass about Gravewit at this point, so I don't think its really considered NPA, and its on Warwicks talk page. Its not being directed at him. -- Isk8.png Sk8 (T/C) 14:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
0WN3D lol nice warwick :) ... ( new Topic Warwick Vs Org :P ) lol --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 14:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Now now cookie, dont be mean, we all know I'd win. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 15:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
hehe well i was guna prepare the next topic ... Warwick Pwns Org :D lol --Cookie™(Talk |Contribs) 15:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
However, threathening to kill somebody isn't that funny. J Striker 15:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
(multi-conflict)I know that you (Warwick) are probably ignoring me but: As far as I can see, every contrib I've added has been positive, except for a few breaches of GW:AGF. Straight from your RFA.. Your problem is is that you continuously say that you don't err, while that's untrue. Also, whatever the case, calling Gravewit an filtered is inappropiate in my opinion. Third, claiming that the general populace of Guildwiki agrees is unproven thus not acceptable as an argument. Lastly, I want you to understand that I don't hate you or anyone else, what I can't stand is people who claim they're always right. You can call me a liar or whatever, but I don't care. --OrgXSignature.jpg 15:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Afaik I only claim I'm right when I am. Tbh, whats the difference between a positive contribution and a contribution that isn't negative? Imo, nothing, and so afaic, I was right. asshole is commonly used on this wiki, and a lot of people call each other assholes anyway. I don't claim I'm always right, I only claim I'm right when I am. I never said anything about you being a liar, but yes, if you want, I can call you a liar. I'm not saying its true, I'm saying that you're a twister. and I dont care that you dont care. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 15:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Frankly Warwick, I agree with Org on all counts. You do have something of a superiority complex and an inability to admit your mistakes. Also, take that crap about Org out of your stolen MotD; you're not a victim here. Felix Omni Signature.png 21:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

What phails is NOT Wikia's coding. What phails is the coding of the pages (written by GuildWiki users) that breaks. Our old codebase has something that attempts to clean up and wipes after your asses if you code something that phails. Wikia doesn't have that on, and I personally think we should write better code instead of relying on automatic software to attempt and fix broken stuff that we wrote. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 00:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

In all honesty Pan, some of this code we are trying to fix is damn complicated, and we are all busting our asses to try to correct it. Just because you have a higher knowledge of wiki coding doesn't give you the right to comment like that. -- Isk8.png Sk8 (T/C) 00:07, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I have a right to my personal opinion. My personal opinion is not meant to be condescending, I just don't trust software trying to auto-correct stuff. Apologies if it came out being offensive. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 00:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Org said: I know that you (Warwick) are probably ignoring me but: As far as I can see, every contrib I've added has been positive, except for a few breaches of GW:AGF. Straight from your RFA.. Your problem is is that you continuously say that you don't err, while that's untrue. Also, whatever the case, calling Gravewit an filtered is inappropiate in my opinion. Third, claiming that the general populace of Guildwiki agrees is unproven thus not acceptable as an argument. Lastly, I want you to understand that I don't hate you or anyone else, what I can't stand is people who claim they're always right. You can call me a liar or whatever, but I don't care.

1)Can't comment, and it doesn't matter to me. Stop making big a big deal about what's been done. 2)You calling her childish doesn't seem appropriate in my opinion. 3)There is no argument going on here, merely points of view which conflict and petty insults (From you). 4)I agree with you, and it's because of that I can't stand you.

Felix said: Frankly Warwick, I agree with Org on all counts. You do have something of a superiority complex and an inability to admit your mistakes.

Does it matter?


I'm not War's friend, I'm an aquaintance at best. I'm just easily intrigued into conversations with people who annoy me.Zulu Inuoe 00:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

No, Felix's opinion doesn't matter. But then again, does yours? This has morphed into Wick v. Org; anybody else interjecting their opinions is useless and just fueling the fire. Note that this post is no better. Maui sig.png 00:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
It entertains me, so it is in fact better. I was not saying his opinion doesn't matter (Though I'm not saying it does either), I'm saying what does it matter if War "[has] something of a superiority complex and an inability to admit [her] mistakes"? Zulu Inuoe 11:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Zulu, you're quite right, I do find it... screw hard, nigh impossible to admit my mistakes. What remains is the fact that OrgX seems to have some sort of vendetta against me, or is just generally looking for any mistakes at all that I make. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Ads-Be-Gone[]

.css, not .js AT 15:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

aha. Thanks. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 20:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

lmao[]

<3 the monobook. Everyone is copying now! --Macros 18:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Ftw. lol. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 20:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
NEW MONOBOOK SUCKS ASS!!--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 00:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
/agree —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Alright everyone[]

Goodnight. —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 20:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Good night, sweet prince. Misfate 00:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Don't you mean Princess? --GEO-logo.png Jïörüjï Ðērākō.>.cнаt^ 00:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I have the feeling he knew what he said. o_O Maui sig.png 00:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 :/ Misfate 00:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Lol and such Felix Omni Signature.png 03:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Tired of this crap. This message applies to EVERYone. Entropy Sig.jpg (T/C) 03:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

What message, Entropy? —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 14:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm thinking this you vs orgx bull. And entropy is "advising" others to not start such an argument, and advising you and him to drop yours. Unless I'm mistaken. --Shadowcrest 16:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)