GuildWiki

GuildWiki has been locked down: anonymous editing and account creation are disabled. Current registered users are unaffected. Leave any comments on the Community Portal.

READ MORE

GuildWiki
Advertisement
Warwick

GuildWarsWiki ▲ GuildWiki ▲ PvXWiki
Please leave new messages at the bottom of this page.




# Signature # Signature
1 You nicked it, damn CC licence. RT | Talk - A joyous wintersday to all 15:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC) 2 YAWAI! --- VipermagiSig.JPG-- (s)talkpage 12:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
3 Damn you RT.. you moved me out of number1 .. grrrr Isk8.pngIsk8 18:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC) 4 OWNED --Warwick sig.JPG Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 15:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
20-3 eh? Bored 20:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
69 lol'd. --Feardrake.JPG 12:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
7 Lolwut? 15:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC) Greek letters make the best numbers!Entrea SumataeEntrea Sumatae [Talk] 21:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
9 NOWAI! Isk8.pngIsk8 12:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC) with even more love <3 — Nova Neo-NovaSmall.jpg(contribs) 21:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
11 A new sig for a new signingness! —MaySig.pngWarw/Wick 18:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
42 wins. Cress Arvein(Talk) 22:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC) 12 'cuz I can —MaySig.png Warw/Wick
13 Pºtªtº Lann-sf2.jpg Lann 21:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
x^0 Lewl, i ar numbar wun. --Ruricu Shield of Deflection is purty! (TalkContribs) 18:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC) 16 Chuck Norris 22:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
17 x/0 prwnd everyone --Shadowcrest 21:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
19 Yay. Thoughtful Thoughtful Sig.png 23:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
28¾ Felix Omni Signature.png 20:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC) ? thanks for the welcome. ~the rat~ LegionRat 15:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Ø I win.--Gigathrash sig G.jpgìğá†ħŕášħ 05:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC) No u--Marcopolo47 signature new.jpg (Talk) (Contr.) 23:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
13² I was here. And that's all you're getting outta me. Råvŷńǒǔ§Hǔń†ëř :: Talk 02:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 1/∞ I like this number. Some would call it 0, but they'd be wrong. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 03:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
20 May, thanks for helping out a newb. Your page is amazing! BrankoZ 15:42 EST, 16 April 2008 ² Hi :) --Fighterbitsjsig.jpg Wammo--STALK MEH 17:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
√-1 Hola. Sry I dont have a good sig.Relyk 02:12, 17 June 2008 (UTC) e^π Nice page May. Dragnmn talk cont 11:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
1337 "Burn Baby Burn!".jpgFireTock 00:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC) e^iπ I should probably get around to signing your page of pink. Woe to the unprepared eye. Woe. JonTheMon 18:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
1338 ? Tenetke Just wanted to tell you thanks for all the kind words. Really appreciate everything and I hope I can help with wiki out more.


For the the template, see:

User:Warwick/TopEnd/Talk

Welcome[]

To my talkpage. —HelloWarw/Wick 19:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Holy f**k you have a lot of archives.--Gigathrash sig G.jpgìğá†ħŕášħ is hosting a beauty pagent! 19:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Ahem[]

"Imo its usefulness already pretty much got killed when the builds wipe occurred" Then dont look at it and leave the red links be, whatever... --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 18:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Basically, I'm trying to make it useful again. —HelloWarw/Wick 18:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm going to make a bot to take care of this by rewriting the links to point to PvXwiki. The exact article may not exist over there either, but at least it will clean up Special:wantedpages without the need for a bunch of redirect articles. (Why must you archive so much? >.>) —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 19:13, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Alright. I suppose thats a pretty good system really. It could just point (eg say somthing like "For builds see here. The GuildWiki:Builds wipe cleared all builds, and moved them from GuildWiki to Pvx". Seem good enough? And Giga, You only just noticed? :P —HelloWarw/Wick 19:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
What I was thinking was to take a wiki link like [[W/Rt UW Solo]] and just change it to [[pvx:W/Rt UW Solo|W/Rt UW Solo]] so that I'm not actually changing anything except where the link points. There's no need to add a link to the buildswipe page. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 19:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not totally sure if we can do that, since a) Pvx: links, afaik, dont work- pvx:Main Page. Apart from that, it'd probably be quite a lot more practical to do that, though yeah, if you can get a bot to do that, it works well- Though it'll probably take longer, and more RC spam. —HelloWarw/Wick 19:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
That PvX Main link worked just fine for me. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 19:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Wow, I had no idea. Perhaps we should just link to the Main Page of PvX? Because most of those articles don't actually exist on PvX. —HelloWarw/Wick 19:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Just an fyi, im offline now. :p. —HelloWarw/Wick 20:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
It would need to be [[pvx:Build:W/Rt UW Solo|]]. Linking to the build namespace is important ;) Also, just adding one pipe at the end of an interwiki link makes the pvx: part not show. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 20:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Hm, I thought I'd tried that pipe trick a while back with Wikipedia links, but it didn't work. Either I didn't do it right or maybe that's one more little thing that got changed by Wikia. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 20:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Main Page seems to work fine. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(talk) 20:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Yo[]

Done and Done. Contact at will.American Wrath 06:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Since you're back[]

"Viper doesn't really care". Rong. I just have a social/emotional disorder which really gets in the way when I'm discussing crap. (hadn't read it before, missed it cause of archive) --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 19:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Aha. Meh. —HelloWarw/Wick 19:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Me too. Felix Omni Signature.png 19:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Me three (and four) tbh, but meh. —HelloWarw/Wick 19:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

wiki drama[]

In the interests of avoiding wiki drama (which you are so concerned about that you feel it nessecary to hide discussions) I am hereby requesting that you do nothing to deal with the builds and stuff in the wanted pages at this time. If you have an idea, you can post it in the GuildWiki:Community Portal for discussion. —JediRogue 19:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Truthfully, what does that have to do with the builds section? That was just a spring point for the drama- It'll always get there. —HelloWarw/Wick 19:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
If you'd really like to avoid drama, just stop taking unilateral action. Propose every single change before you make it. Felix Omni Signature.png 19:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
That is so impractical that it is just.. —HelloWarw/Wick 19:45, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Yep. Felix Omni Signature.png 19:45, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Ofcourse you wont need to propose to add a dot to some sentence, but the big things (like clogging RC with creating redirects to erase them from Wantedpages) should be proposed. --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 19:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

small FYI about Commands[]

{{move|Chat command|"commands" is plural and "command" requires disambig}} means it shoeld me moved to "Chat command". Note the lower case and singular form :) I'll move it for ya. --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 15:09, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Bah *Poke*. anyway, would you mind getting on msn? I need to discuss somthing with you. And rik, if possible. And RT, but hes afk. —HelloWarw/Wick 15:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Meh, suppose I can. --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 15:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

o_O[]

What's with all the build pages?--Cobalt6.jpg - (Talk/Contribs) 15:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

um...[]

Why are you recreating the build articles again? I thought the consensus was that those articles were not needed. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 15:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I was under the impression that we'd agreed to post a direction to PvXwiki for builds? Isnt that what you were making your bot for? —HelloWarw/Wick 15:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Are you alright with me carrying on with it? If not, I'll stop. —HelloWarw/Wick 15:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
No, the bot is going to edit the links themselves instead of re-creating the articles. And now I'm going to have to re-re-delete all those articles you just made in order for the bot to work. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 15:40, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm really sorry, Ish. I'd misunderstood what it was that you were going to do ;\ —HelloWarw/Wick 15:41, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Anyway, apologies again, and if you think its disruptive behaviour, ban me. —HelloWarw/Wick 15:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
So I herd I was right.Ereanorsign.jpgreanor 15:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
about.. —HelloWarw/Wick 15:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Replacing links instead of recreating them.Ereanorsign.jpgreanor 15:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
You never said to do that.. —HelloWarw/Wick 15:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I said we should instead link to the builds in PvX.Ereanorsign.jpgreanor 15:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Link to the builds in PvX != Change the links to link to PvX.. —HelloWarw/Wick 15:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I won't even try to make you understand.Ereanorsign.jpgreanor 16:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Purely for Knowledge reasons[]

Since I Already know theres about a 0 in 1000 chance of me being promoted, I want to know the opinion-

Would May Make A Good Admin?

Yes


No


No maybes, please. —HelloWarw/Wick 16:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

+-poll RandomTime 17:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

No poll. MayBot 19:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
This is what RfA's are for. Haven't you had your fill yet? Felix Omni Signature.png 22:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not gonna rfa again. I just want to know. —HelloWarw/Wick 05:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Stop spam[]

Get bot RandomTime 17:57, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

You just said I could in MSN! :( —HelloWarw/Wick 17:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
For a little, no more please, it's spamming rc RandomTime 18:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
+1. Could you at least do it when the wiki's dead, at like, 1 am PST? Maui sig.png 19:30, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I have asked warwick to do these things:

edit as maybot, change edit summary and run at 1 per 15 (it's in the bot settings) RandomTime 19:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

I would ask her not to do that until (unless) maybot is given bot status. Felix Omni Signature.png 07:50, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

kids these days...[]

"If no-one opposes this in the next 30 minutes", what the?? Back when I was responsible for proposing some massive changes on the wiki, I used tostirring up trouble for GuildWiki in terms of massive changes, I used to wait for 7~14 days, and was still considered a troublemaker by some.

If you want to blank your own user page, yeah 30 minutes of "if nobody opposes" is fine. A major action on the wiki that is a pain to undo deserves more than one day of notice, and a final 24 hour warning. The ability to learn from experience is part of the factors of "Would May Make A Good Admin?", and I hope you prove to be so, since you are an admin even if not on this wiki. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 19:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

D:.. I'm impatient though! At least this time I actually gave warning that I was going to do it :( —HelloWarw/Wick 19:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Indeed, I do see a positive step towards improvement, which is better than nothing (-: -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 19:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
:D —HelloWarw/Wick 19:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Just as a note, I disagree with all of the reverts. Usually, if it has a picture, skills, levels and profession, and description, its not a stub. There might just not be any notes, and it might not have any drops that are worth noting (Eg special drops). —HelloWarw/Wick 19:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I've counted, like, twelve so far without skills and/or HM level and/or description. And at least twelve more without pictures. zzz. Maui sig.png 20:01, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Its called Bot Editing. —HelloWarw/Wick 20:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
It's called "manual work" --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 20:03, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
No, its called Bot Editing. —HelloWarw/Wick 20:05, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Unless it has all the info from the Style guide, it's a stub. Please quit, unless you're adding in the info. --Shadowcrest 20:06, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Don't run a bot to edit things that require judgement. It prevents fuck ups and a lot of RVing. Lord of all tyria 20:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not doing it anymore. Gonna use it for default editing, much faster and I get normal edits. —HelloWarw/Wick 20:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Botting[]

Just want to make this clear: if you are botting, use maybot if you are yourself use warwick RandomTime 18:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

We've discussed this on MSN, RT. I'm just using AWB to help. —HelloWarw/Wick 18:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Aka I'm checking to make sure I dont screw up totally. —HelloWarw/Wick 18:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Please wait for concerns to be reached, it may take more than a day - this is a warning RandomTime 19:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Ish sez 1 day, I give 1 day. and you're somewhat saying it differently on msn. Stop the bluff, we all know its fake. :D —HelloWarw/Wick 19:53, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Then I'll say it. If you act in a potentially disruptive fashion without attaining consensus again, administrative actions will be taken. Felix Omni Signature.png 19:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Quote: "You need to give at least a full day, two would be even better," some emphasis added —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 19:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Aha. Well.. Uh.. Okay, 2 days next time, I guess. :D —HelloWarw/Wick 19:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Felix, "Potentially Disruptive Action" my foot. What I did didn't do squat (btw, wheres loats edit?), and +1 its not my fault you didn't read the community portal- You were there when I put it up. —HelloWarw/Wick 20:02, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
You've been warned, regardless of whether you remove it again or not. Felix Omni Signature.png 20:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
I added the comment made by felix that was removed in a previous edit by you may. Lord of all tyria 20:04, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
The key word is "potentially" - undertaking a task that will edit 100s of articles without first receiving community approval is a "potentially" disruptive action, because if the community decides it doesn't approve of the action, then 100s of articles have to be reverted. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 20:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
No-one opposed it though :(. And Felix, this is going to turn out like the Builds bull, isnt it? You're going to warn me about somthing, then give no reasoning for the warning, repeat you've given your reasoning then leave. what am I being warned about? The community DIDNT OPPOSE IT.HelloWarw/Wick 20:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
You can interpret it however you like; I won't insult your intelligence by repeating myself again. Felix Omni Signature.png 20:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
(EC)And no one agreed with it either. You're just inciting drama every time you or felix go on the same talkpage, I don't care who's fault it is; so why don't you both stfu if the other is already involved? Its getting ridiculous. Lord of all tyria 20:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Agree with loat. And here it is again, Felix warning me about somthing yet refusing to give squat in way of proof, support or anything.. —HelloWarw/Wick 20:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
I wish I had the luxury of stfuing, but it's my job to prevent people from harming the wiki. Felix Omni Signature.png 20:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
And here he goes again, totally ignoring what I've said, and going on about some duty crap. And fyi, Felix, in no way did it harm the wiki. It just wasn't useful. —HelloWarw/Wick 20:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Rt warned you; you ignored it, so felix reiterated said warning. Both of you drop it, or go back to the original topic. Lord of all tyria 20:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

(Reset indent) (edit conflict) LoaT is right, no one agreed with your proposal. Poki and PanSola even proposed a different way to do the same thing, and also do add a lot more useful stuff to all the monster pages at the same time. LoaT is also right in saying that both you and Felix need to let this conversation drop - every comment either of you make here seems to simply be inciting the other, and it'll probably end up with both of you getting banned. (I just got ec'ed 4 times trying to post this... seriously, shut up about this. >.>)—Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 20:18, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Felix and I have a long standing hatred. :D —HelloWarw/Wick 20:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Then you should have learned by now how to ignore him. And he's not the only one warning you - while I may not have used the word "warn" explicitly, I thought I was getting the same point across with my comments. Since that didn't work: I am also warning you to refrain from undertaking any potentially disruptive activities (as I defined them above) without getting community consensus first. And that doesn't mean "wait exactly 24/48 hours, then if no one has disagreed, go do it." It means waiting for everyone who has something to say about your idea has had a chance to say it, and yes, sometimes this will take longer than a couple days. You have shown yourself to be a very impatient person, but either you learn to be patient or you risk bringing up issues like this again and again until you are finally perma-banned for it.
Geez, I've tried to stay out of this issue since being made an admin, not wanting to be accused of "flaunting my new-found power around," but I guess I'm finally caught up in it. >_< —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 20:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
:D —HelloWarw/Wick 20:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
>.> What exactly is that supposed to mean? —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 20:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Cookies if you can find the reference. —HelloWarw/Wick 20:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Ugh... mind linking to the section you edited in edit summary? RandomTime 20:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not going to play games with you. I've said what I have to say, so I'm leaving this discussion for now and going back to deleting unused images. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 20:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


General rule of thumb: If nobody disagreed with you, but the number of ppl agreeing with you is barely a handful (ie, significant number of people have not expressed an opinion), and you feel it's about time, add another note explicit warning people that lack of opposition would be seen as endorsement of whatever the relative majority opinion is, THEN wait for 24 more hours.

The way I usually do it is to put up the explicit warning on the 6th day so I get to act after 7 days has passed (on an issue that ppl aren't commenting on and not opposing). -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 20:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Yay, Pan gives useful [advice]. —HelloWarw/Wick 20:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Note: don't take the above and interpret it as you can explicitly warn ppl about abstension=endorece majority on day 1, so that you get to act after 24 hours of no opposition. In terms of TOTAL time, that is still not enough for the community to react and respond. The explicit warning is given AFTER sufficient time have passed such that most ppl interested in the issue should have read about it already but didn't make a comment. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 20:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
3 days, warn on the second? —HelloWarw/Wick 20:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
I believe my rational for 7 total days was because there might be ppl who only drop by on the weekends, or on certain days of a week (assume at least twice a week), so a 7-day total period gives those people a chance to notice the issue too. Thus, I highly recommend 7, or however many days there is in a week (could change, you never know). -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 20:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Aha. Another troublemaker, eh? —HelloWarw/Wick 20:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Bot On GWW[]

If you want to launch it, you need to request it on our noticeboard. But so help me you better gain conceus b4 u make large edits their, GWW is my baby so don't mess with it, unless it is approved :D. Read our bot policy (which asnt be launched yet but we still use it as a basis). Ok that is what I have to say :o) --Shadowphoenix 20:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

... yeah —HelloWarw/Wick 20:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Flowers.[]

Nova told me to get you some. Misfate 02:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I dont get it. —HelloWarw/Wick 06:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


Is that really you?[]

I mean no offense with my question but is that really your picture? Because it's a picture of a really hot girl that I could never imagine be seen touching a computer. If this has been answered in one of your archives then I apologize, I couldn't be bothered browsing through some archives Blue.rellik 10:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, though people are still skeptical. :|. I'll show them when I get a new camera, though ;) —HelloWarw/Wick 15:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
This one is marginally more believable than Kristen Bell, at any rate. Felix Omni Signature.png 16:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Judging by the last avalanche of pictures which she claimed were her, I'd say no. :D But I've been wrong before. Maui sig.png 16:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Heh, the last avalanche were all of one person though. Believe me, this is me. —HelloWarw/Wick 16:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Can hair get that much longer in three years? Felix Omni Signature.png 16:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Evidently. —HelloWarw/Wick 16:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm getting a haircut on Sunday. Felix Omni Signature.png 16:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
I hate haircuts tbh. —HelloWarw/Wick 16:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
I haven't gotten a haircut since I graduated from high school, leading Lost-Blue to call me a child molester. D: Felix Omni Signature.png 16:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Why was THAT? O__o —HelloWarw/Wick 16:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Why the fake pictures in teh first place? —JediRogue 17:09, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

She's fat? lolEreanorsign.jpgreanor 17:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Sensitive as ever xP--Cobalt6.jpg - (Talk/Contribs) 18:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Nope, it's not[]

":P. None of you are ever gonna get real pixx of me. ;). And ofc, wammo.. I believe you. ;)" -- May

So, can't be a real pic. --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 19:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I also said I'd never say I liked RT, but it happened.. D: —HelloWarw/Wick 19:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
But that's cause when you said you'd never say you'd say you liked RT was a lie. Grammatically correct, mentally unstable sentence ftw? --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 19:50, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Whys it mentally unstable? —HelloWarw/Wick 19:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
because Viper says it and tbh he knows when something is mentally unstable (no offense intented if u intentd to be offended :P) --Fighterbitsjsig.jpg Wammo--talkpage Fighterbitsj 20:00, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Well, yeah, it is mentally unstable cause I say so. And cause it's hard to pronounce. --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 20:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
What is hard to pronounce? :P (I spy with my little eye someone who needs to work on his pronounciation?) --Fighterbitsjsig.jpg Wammo--talkpage Fighterbitsj 20:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
"But that's cause when you said you'd never say you'd say you liked RT was a lie" And yes, I need to work on my pronouncation ,and articulation. But, cba. Also: DwG + AR * 6 = 1020 Lightning Dmg. EPIC WIN SPIKE ZOMG! Icy Shackles for snare. --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 20:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Sometimes I think everybody needs to work on their articulation. :P --Fighterbitsjsig.jpg Wammo--talkpage Fighterbitsj 20:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Moot point Viper, it's already been established that we need a legit signpic before we consider believing her. D: Maui sig.png 20:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
She said that I would find it out soon, which I don't get because I only know her from wiki and Guild Wars and not like msn so she can't send me pics or stuff xD --Fighterbitsjsig.jpg Wammo--talkpage Fighterbitsj 21:09, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the internet. Any personal info, such as age, sex, religion, looks, favorite sports team, and what you had for breakfast by definition CANNOT BE REAL! -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 21:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

In that case, I'm a 13-year-old female atheist with the body of Tyra Banks who's totally into the KC Royals and had a big bowl of sauerkraut (every single morning!) for breakfast. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 22:06, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Props[]

I couldn't believe how much negative commentary is posted on May's talk page. Looks to me as if lessons in people skills and general good manners need to be added to the requirements for being an admin. I'm a new user and know almost nothing about doing things in GWW, but May clearly has the kind of helpful attitude that I'd think the admins would want in an admin. From reading above, appears that she misunderstood something, caused an unfortunate incident, apologized for it, and yet is still getting grief for it. Some of you really need to do a self-check, and cut her some slack.

That said, May (or anyone who can answer), since you suggested that I contact you here rather than by email, is it OK to resubmit the same pictures of my characters but bigger? Also, my pics were from the login page, and were full sized when I submitted them (or at least I think they were), but when they showed up on the page, they were quite small. Any suggestions? Brankoz 17:46, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

To answer your second point first, yeah, you can upload as many images as you want, as long as they arn't profane. I'd suggest retaking the images, and putting them in as bigger images.
To be honest, their opionion is pretty truthful. I make a lot of those sorts of mistakes, and its sort of stupid. I should have learnt it by now, but not. I'm of the same opinion about the admin idea (:P), but when the community says no, you put up with it. I already know the community opinion, and the chance that it will change. And yeah, I misunderstood, and there was a profound lack of communication, and lack of time given. Tbh, I can be a pretty bad troll when provoked. I've been given about as much slack as I'm gonna get :p. —HelloWarw/Wick 17:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
It looks like you're not cropping the images correctly, and I've actually seen this a lot. I'm not sure what the problem might be, whether it's the editing program you're using or what. Double-check to make sure that there isn't any extra white space around the image after you crop it. I'm no image editing expert, though, so maybe someone else can help more. —Dr Ishmael Diablo the chicken.gif 19:24, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Looks like paint and not resizing the total image. Lord of all tyria 19:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Peoples' reactions are influenced by former problems with User:Warwick (which was earlier used by both May and her brother). -- Gem (gem / talk) 00:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Yeah. As I was basically saying.. I can be a troll sometimes. —HelloWarw/Wick 20:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Bye[]

I'm likely not gonna be on till late tommorow. D: —HelloWarw/Wick 20:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Party>hangover. — Nova Neo-NovaSmall.jpg(contribs) 22:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Good Morning Sunshine[]

You have just been spammed by sunshine! *Smiles* --Shadowphoenix 08:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

nEW[]

Message for test lulz --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 18:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Moar message for tets failz --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 18:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Stop[]

In case you didn't notice, Category:drops mesmer unique item isn't real. --Macros 18:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I know, but the category is breaking GW:ULC.. —HelloWarw/Wick 18:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
and more than one person has argued that Mesmer is an ingame term to be caitalized according to GW:ULC. I don't quite remember how the discussion ended though... -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 18:40, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Categories are chaotic and inaccurate enough, why mess with something that's already done? --Macros 18:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Because the category is breaking GW:ULC? And Pan, regardless of that, it should be Unique item or unique item. —HelloWarw/Wick 18:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
If you want to go on a crusade, why don't you add categories to pages that need them? Category:Incubus is empty for example. --Macros 18:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Very well, but I dont agree with us breaking GW:ULC. Since you think thats more important, I'll go cat it. —HelloWarw/Wick 18:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Firstly, the D in drops is supposed to be capitalized. The mesmer thing is debatable. There's already a bot for doing this (in fact, it's on the bot tasks page right now). This is the type of thing people get irritated with you about. --Shadowcrest 18:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Just to be clear, I agree that if a category is breaking ULC, it should be fixed. And if it is obviously clear what the correct name of the category should be renamed to, then Warwick changing it would be fine. Problem arises when it is debatable as to WHAT is the category name that conforms to ULC. -User:PanSola (talk to the Follower of Lyssa.png) 18:59, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

bumping[]

Isn't required every 8 hours, especially since if I did my math right you bumped at 3 AM her time and then at 11 AM :P --Shadowcrest 18:52, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I know, I'm feeling really tired atm, and I thought I bumped it like 3 days ago, not today :\ —HelloWarw/Wick 18:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
You bumped it once before the wine, and once after your first bottle. --- Ohaider!-- (s)talkpage 19:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
D:. I'm going to archive now.. Then go take a nap.. —HelloWarw/Wick 19:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)