Talk: Warwick/Archive 5

Dat 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)e/Time

Friday

01

July - 2022

10:52 UTC

Archives

Archives

---

Archive 1 (My N00bish Days)
Archive 2 (Now Viewable Again!)
Archive 3 (Spam Message took 40kb..)
Archive 4 (W00t, spam pyramid, continued on this page)
Archive 5 (Took a while to archive, but i guess its archive time!)

Rate-a-user

Favored:

Unfavoured:

Delete/Ban:

First post!

First post muhaha -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam Pyramid

Continuing... NOW!

ROAR!--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Growl --- -- (s)talkpage 20:27, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

SPAM PYRAMID!

I call for a spam pyramid! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Just -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

To -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Get -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

us started off ive added 5! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

In memory of Auron I'm spamming less ;) Lord of all tyria 20:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Me too. Which is the reason that I added this completely necessary and important comment on your talk page, which I am on.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Have another tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Yey -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Some -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

More -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Awe what the hellz... I wansta be popular too !!! Isk8 20:13, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm good at making people take part ;) -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:14, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Take part in what?-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Spam pyramid. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:15, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Where??-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

On YOUR talk page! *runs off* --- -- (s)talkpage 20:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

'tis still being made.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

How big do you make a pyramid before you start going down?--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Couple'a tiers off the end of the page. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Another Tier--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Not a tier o.O--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:20, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I believe I actually invented the spam pyramid.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:21, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Not true marco. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tiers are FTW! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

WEEE TIERS! -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Yay.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

yay v2.. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

BTW marco, the egyptian leader Warwick made the spam pyramids. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Yah, that was the Egyptians, if you look closely each of the blocks on the pyramids is covered in hieroglyphics, they can be translated to phrases such as "Lol,pwnt", "SPAM ATTACK", and "This is a tier".--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Yup, i made the slaves put them there. Archiving, BUT i'll be moving the spam pyramid to the new page. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Time to back this up now... starting to do weird things to firefox Isk8 20:25, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Tier.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Done.--igathrashTalk^Cont 20:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Stop. Spamming. Now

Your spamming is just insane. Please, you're filling up Recent Changes with nothing but your inanity Blue.rellik 20:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Unless you can create the entire spam pyramid in one edit...-- (Talk) (Contr.) 20:31, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I lol'd --Blue.rellik 20:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Lets just try that then? -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Nice? -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 20:36, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Delete tags

Why do you remove all the content below the delete tag? :P Lord of all tyria 22:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Because its not beautiful spam, so it must be destroyed. -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 22:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Mmmkk. Lord of all tyria 22:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Userboxes

Can I use them? Please? Pretty pleasies? -- Feardrake. 02:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Heh, they're not really his. It's basically just a compilation of every user's userboxes on the wiki.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 02:55, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I know. But I want them. NOW. XD -- Feardrake. 02:57, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I know Gigathrash doesn't want Warwick to have his userboxes. Which would likely apply to you to. So.. find out which ones are Gigathrash's, and use all but those. =P --Shadowcrest 03:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I dont want all of them, I actually want only a few of Giga's. He said on the talk page that you could rip 3 from it.. so ok! -- Feardrake. 03:05, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

If warwick had asked me before he stole them I would have said he could have stolen them all, my policy is you can steal up to 3 without me knowing it, but to steal more you need to ask, I usually always answer yes.--igathrashTalk^Cont 03:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

My temporary sig

--Shadowcrest 07:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

About Warw temporary sig: It is too big. The coding exceeds 3 lines of code on an 800*600 screen. Sorry :) --- -- (s)talkpage 10:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Are you talking about my sig or warwicks? --Shadowcrest 16:25, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Warwicks.-- (Talk) (Contr.) 16:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Poke

Nevermind me, just deathly tired >_> Jennalee 14:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Poke right back.. Did you see medibuh post support? yay, i get a guildie's Support woo! btw, jenna would you post on my RFA? =D -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) (My RFA! (vote support) 14:10, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Don't know you well enough to make a sensible judgement tbh <_< Jennalee 14:17, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

...and definitely not today due to multiple brain malfunctions >_> Jennalee 14:18, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

GW:SIGN

Viper says your sig breaks GW:SIGN, as it is over 3 lines of code. If you're going to enforce policy you're going to follow them all too :P --Shadowcrest 17:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Lose the RFA part of your sig-- (Talk) (Contr.) 17:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

WOW, somebody noticed I was talking about it breaking GW:SIGN. Lulz :) --- -- (s)talkpage 17:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Orly? Ill shorten it then -- Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) (My RFA! (vote support) 17:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

prwnd --Shadowcrest 17:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Adding proper link-- (Talk) (Contr.) 17:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Better? -- Warwick (T)/(C) (My RFA! (vote support) 17:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Nope, still too long. And i was too lazy to link the prwnd part --Shadowcrest 17:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

CONFLICT no! RT | Talk - The The Whacking editor 17:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I was joking it took up a little more than 3 lines. It took up more than 4... O_o --- -- (s)talkpage 17:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

O_o.... Anyway, BETTER!? -- Warwick (T)/(C) (RFA! 17:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Nope! RT | Talk - The The Whacking editor 17:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Make it within 1 font tag, not 5 --- -- (s)talkpage 17:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

..... *Poke* -- Warwick (T)/(C) (RFA!) 17:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Almost. You're a </font>]]) over. --Shadowcrest 17:49, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] [[User:Warwick|<font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick</font>]] ([[User talk:Warwick|<font face="vivaldi" size="3">T</font>]])/([[Special:Contributions/Warwick|<font face="vivaldi" size="3">C</font>]]) ([[GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Warwick(2)|<font face="vivaldi" size="3">RFA!</font>]]) <-- current... It's freaking huge! +

this --> [[Image:Warwick sig.JPG]] [[User:Warwick|<font face="vivaldi" size="4">Warwick]] ([[User talk:Warwick|T]])/([[Special:Contributions/Warwick|C]]) ([[GuildWiki:Requests for adminship/Warwick(2)|RFA!</font>]]) 17:48, 9 December 2007 (UTC) works too --- -- (s)talkpage 17:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Stupid E/c.. its fine now -- Warwick (T)/(C) (RFA!) 17:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

YAY, it JUST fits! --- -- (s)talkpage 17:53, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

TotalTw*t

Can we go for a Permanant Ban on this user. The login name is jsut offensive and Kids read this Wiki. Surley there is a Policy about login names? Himm Taeguk (T/C) 17:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Personally, im not sure, but ive flagged him for banning. I'm not a admin myself, so im powerless. I gave up on my RFA, since i dont think ive been here long enough. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 17:51, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Upto the gods then. This user is what his name suggests though. :D Himm Taeguk (T/C) 17:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Can someone explain me what the hell is login name means??--Ricky 17:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Tw*t is an abusive Swear English Word, not used in civil conversations. To be a Total Tw*t is to be a Complete Git.Himm Taeguk (T/C) 18:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Although there's no official policy that explicitly states "Bad login names are cause for banning", it is implied by policies like GW:NPA and such. Past precedent from me and other admins has been to perma-ban any account name which is obviously inappropriate. For example, the one you listed would merit an infiniban. But borderline names like "SmexiOne" could probably pass, especially if they had valid contribs. Such names are not nice, but not inherently offensive either. (T/C) 15:26, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Goodbye

See you around, Warwick. Cress Arvein(Talk) 20:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

He's not actually leaving, cress. at least, I dont think so. --Shadowcrest 20:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Well that's good. He had me convinced, though. Cress Arvein(Talk) 20:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Same here. --Shadowcrest 21:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I didnt realise I'd said i was leaving.. Had I? -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 22:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes. "I'm offically moving to the Offical wiki", and "But I'm leaving this wiki, and going offical" imply/state youre leaving, which is why I told you to let Marco know you weren't actually leaving. --Shadowcrest 22:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Am I still considered mature in your point of view? -- (Talk) (Contr.) 23:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry marco, i went offline for a while. I'm not totally sure about you anymore, but I truly think that it takes maturity to be able to admit that you were wrong, and stand down from a position of power that you dont think you are capable with. Yes, marco, I do think that you are mature. -- Warwick (Talk)/(Contr.) 12:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)